NAME OF FILER I.D. NUMBER REPORT NUMBER San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I 1374554 G15-NOI-02
4. Payments of $100 or More Received Number of continuation sheets attached ______.
IF AN INDIVIDUAL, ENTER OCCUPATION AND FULL NAME, STREET ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF DONOR CUMULATIVE AMOUNT DATE RECEIVED EMPLOYER AMOUNT RECEIVED (IF COMMITTEE, ALSO ENTER I.D. NUMBER) RECEIVED (ANNUAL) (IF SELF-EMPLOYED, ENTER NAME OF BUSINESS) 09/22/15 California Association of Realtors - Issues N/A $200,000 $237,000 Mobilization Political Action Committee
Created: 07/2015 S:\ALL FORMS\Campaign Finance\Current Campaign Finance Forms\SFEC Form 162.docx SFEC Form 162 Revised: 07/2015
NAME OF FILER I.D. NUMBER REPORT NUMBER San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I 1374554 G15-NOI-02
2. Electioneering Communications Made (CONTINUED) Continuation sheet ______of ______. DATE DESCRIPTION OF ELECTIONEERING COMMUNICATION NAME OF CANDIDATE & OFFICE POSITION AMOUNT TOTAL/CANDIDATE (ANNUAL)
10/14/15 Mailer Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $345.80 $71,890.64 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/16/15 Mailer Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $278.85 $72,169.49 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/18/15 E-mail Blast Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $58.01 $72,227.50 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/19/15 Mailer Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $345.80 $72,573.30 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/19/15 Mailer Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $278.85 $72,852.15 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/21/15 Door Hanger Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $16.12 $72,868.27 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/21/15 Mailer Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $229.91 $73,098.18 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/22/15 Mailer Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $691.60 $73,789.78 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL
10/22/15 Newspaper Ad Edwin Lee, Mayor տ SUPPORT $91.73 $73,881.51 տ OPPOSE ✔ տ NEUTRAL տ SUPPORT տ OPPOSE տ NEUTRAL
Created: 07/2015 S:\ALL FORMS\Campaign Finance\Current Campaign Finance Forms\SFEC Form 162.docx SFEC Form 162 Revised: 07/2015
on 425 Market Street, 26th Floor PRSRT STD NO US POSTAGE San Francisco, CA 94105 PAID PROP Pacific Print NO HOUSING MORATORIUMI Resources
Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by California Association of Realtors – Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee and Robert Rosania. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org The PROP I HOUSING MORATORIUM
JUNK SCIENCE behind the Join the thousands of San Franciscans The Dangerous Economics Behind who are lining up against Prop I v Senator v SPUR the Housing Moratorium Dianne Feinstein v San Francisco v Mayor Ed Lee Bay Area Renters The proponents of Proposition I claim that stopping new housing will somehow result in more v Assemblymember Federation affordable housing. David Chiu v San Francisco v Board of Equalization Chamber of But the facts are clear: fewer homes will make housing more expensive, not less expensive. Member Fiona Ma Commerce Denying that is like denying climate change—it is ignoring basic science—in this case the v Assessor-Recorder v San Francisco Police Officers Association science of economics. Less supply, along with the same or increased demand, means prices go Carmen Chu v Supervisor Katy Tang v Plumbers and up. It is called the law of supply and demand. It isn’t politics; it is economic science. Pipefitters Local 38 v Supervisor Scott Wiener v Raoul Wallenberg Jewish Democratic What would Prop I do? Let’s do the math: v Supervisor Club Mark Farrell v Laborers the number of new affordable housing units required to v San Francisco International Union be built under Prop I1 Democratic Party of North America, O v Asian Pacific Local Union 261 Democratic Club the total number of homes that would fail to be built under v San Francisco 2 v Mission Housing Action (minus) 1,495 Prop I (including hundreds of new affordable homes) Democratic Club Coalition (equals) v Alice B. Toklas LGBT v City Democratic Club Democratic Club And many others! Less affordable housing and more v SanSan FrFranciscoancisco displacement for existing residents YYoYoungung DemocratsDDemocrats
1 Read the full legislation here: sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/candidates/Nov2015/MissionBuildingMoratorium_Text.pdf 2 Memo RE: Mission District Housing Moratorium, San Francisco Planning Department, July 2015. 2015151 BERR 111, 2 SEPTEMEM pausu e buiuildinng isist bllasa ts It just doesn’t add up. Ecconnomom City’s top economist finds that Prop I
will make San Francisco’s housing problem worse. Read it for yourself at Vote NO on Prop I :9 :A W www.sfrealhousingsolutions.com/report '4>4?BBB $#0,7:@>492$:7@?4:9> .:81:=8:=0491:=8,?4:9 San Francisco for Real Housing Solutions, No on I PRSRT STD US POSTAGE 反對 提案 425 Market Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 PAID 反對暫緩房屋興建 PRECISE Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by Robert Rosania and California Association of Realtors Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org PRINTING AND MAILING
ኯ͙؛Ձܛν ޘંܦā֬ގئΝፈޘᎷ
反對 提案 反對暫緩房屋興建 Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Franciscociation Association of of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by Robert Rosania and California Association of Realtors Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee. Financial disclosures availablesfethics.or at sfethics.orgg Όܛኯν؛Ձ ྼ̜ގృԿйΝፈٖޘܦI ೨८ඖ खèյˁ݄ϡݶͅ࠸ደ̅څʶྸʅɿࡵ፟݀ࡵфܶశуۃͥ׃ө êͥܘڅశуèЪ̫љЃʉʴʇé૦ࣗéᙲषʇ࢝é֝ᚼʧ̤ͅфϛӎ
๙ܶèັˁ̹ݨᆛСͅ࠸ደܶê ᗊ፟݀ϡསۈI ಐख ࡍ݀֝ࡹϖ̋ۈಐखè͠ߋгڅʉ୯؟ઘؓρЪ̺ϺێI ಐखݶɿᆋᅞધ ˾ཧቶè ܶ֝φᆨêˀєͶ়ᏹѫʩࣂèӧᅎ̷ϡгڅԔጜᐵ̒ ࠴ê·څላè๒ࣁʅ୦ϡఢʴࣂࣙ؟ণനʇචཬʐᄭ˕èዘࠔᐢڬՔ়ͅ
ᑸՊᙰ࢝ࠗʧ˃è̤˫Ͽ֝ۃˬ I ಐखêቂї֝ࣂʇႪͥ׃өۃͥ ֍ˀ৺ͮᐄêʓᗟͥͻɿᄬˬ I ಐखýӎڅʣʖ໘ ኚгȇ˗͠˫͞Էே̈́၅ I ೨८ ӧϡཋ৯ቂᔘᚺႏғî:-9LHS/V\ZPUN:VS\[PVUZJVT
֝ᑸՊ׃өۃቂႪͥ ᙰ࢝ࠗʧ˃è̤˫Ͽʣ ʓᗟͥͻɿᄬڅʖ໘
၅ ೨८ οԉїࣵ ˫ᘷνңࣂੂᐁؠ̈́ I ՙ˰༨ͻ̠ᚏք ʹา ѥရ͚ ఖӅᎩêڅ̈αЊᘖУੈᆝਪ݀ܶ Ϸ ʓᗟͥྸұ ቂኍ̤ʔಐखθ̂!ZMNV]VYNM[W\WSVHKLKMPSLZLSLJ[PVUZJHUKPKH[LZ5V] 4PZZPVU)\PSKPUN4VYH[VYP\TF;L_[WKM ࠸ደܶ˄శуϿ͵êĔͅ࠸ደܶբᏼဈ࠲è৸ݭϷܿ֝ͅנͥڅϿ݀ڼɿࡵజء੫ èʆྒྷɿˊϷ˘̈ʐ˘̆ê 反對 提案ܯ˚ӟཋ֝੫ᔩݰ᎘ੈڋèĕ θϐశîO[[W!^^^ZMYLHSOV\ZPUNZVS\[PVUZJVTLUKVYZLTLU[Zڅᄚ˫̠࠲࿌ᝃੈڋቂኍ̤ʔˬ0ಐख ॳ༲Ԁʓᗟͥфܶᖆè֝ˬ0ಐख̥́êʓᗟͥܶнᑸຽéʓᗟͥౝ 反對暫緩房屋興建 ᑸຽéʓᗟͥϚୖʇքè֝ܶ݀௫ੌ-77*0+ۃ֝ͅݡᚯᅎ Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of ኍê Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by Robert Rosania and California Association of Realtors Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.orgދդв9VILY[9VZHUPH֝:L[O4HSSLUê˚ෆ৸ੁཋअͅϛZML[OPJZVYNۂᗹѫê̠࠲ཋ on 425 Market Street, 26th Floor PRSRT STD NO San Francisco, CA 94105 US POSTAGE PAID PROP Pacific Print NO HOUSING MORATORIUMI Resources
Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by California Association of Realtors – Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee and Robert Rosania. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org HOLE Chief Economistsays: in their argument THERE’S A The City’s
FEWER HOMES MEAN HIGHER RENTS.
an Francisco’s Francisco’s Chief Chief Economist took a close look at What does S Prop I — the Housing Moratorium. He found that the Chief Prop I would not protect the renters it’s intended to help. Economist say It’s a double hit. Rents go up and available apartments are harder to get, adding to financial stress. And Prop I won’t do anything to about Prop I? prevent displacements or discourage gentrification. “The report finds no In fact, Prop I stops the building of 1,500 new homes including evidence that a temporary hundreds of affordable homes—and it doesn’t require building moratorium would New report shows Prop I one single new affordable home. will raise rents and increase evictions. prevent the demolition of existing housing and direct Prop I will make it harder to live — and rent — in San Francisco. displacement of current Join the San Francisco Bay Area Renters’ Federation, Senator Dianne Feinstein, residents, discourage upper-income households Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Ed Lee, the Mission Democratic Club and dozens from moving into the of local leaders and community organizations in saying “No” to Prop I. Mission, or ease rising rents Visit www.SFRealHousingSolutions.com for more information. and housing prices in the neighborhood.”
Read the report for yourself “ I rent in the Mission. I oppose Prop I because we need to make it easier, not at: SFRealHousingSolutions. harder, to build new homes. Fewer homes mean higher prices.” com/report
— RAFAEL SOLARI, MEMBER OF THE SF BAY AREA RENTERS’ FEDERATION ࢴमགᑺጮच ࠓ I ೨८! City’s Chief Economist Blasts Propositionpositiono I
:ࣖᐢዖࣂైѿݤ̴ǹಐख! City’s Chief Economist Report Says Proposition I Wouldנͥ ìಐ˦ܶᄱथ 5DLVHKRXVLQJSULFHV DLOVWRSUHYHQWWKHGLVSODFHPHQWRIFXUUHQWUHVLGHQWV( ᕺ͜ޠìˀ়Տ̋Њͻ 'HFUHDVHWKHDYDLODELOLW\RIUHVRXUFHVIRUDIIRUGDEOH ཋກ KRXVLQJGHYHORSPHQWڅì˳ͅ࠸ደܶഛ࣊
ʓᗟͥైʓᗟͥై San FranciscoFrancisco ChronicleChronicle ʆྒྷɿˊϷʄ̈ʐɿ̆SSeptembereptember 11,11, 20152015 0RQWJRPHU\6W 3565767' 6DQ)UDQFLVFR&$ 863267$*( PAID 35(&,6( 35,17,1* $1'0$,/,1*
ࣖᐢዖࣂݤ̴ǹಐख̫ܶφጆӧ̷ᘸࡍנͥ
ࣖᐢዖࣂݤ̴ǹಐखᅎ̷ܶϿ͵èڅͥ͵ѿΖèైڅᅝ࠴ழഛ̴נͥ ب࠸ደܶᖆêǹಐखͅڅ༲Ԁʓᗟͥءè֝ݨϚˀѧᘘ͜ޠˀ়Տ̋ͻ ᄚ̠֝נϚ͑͵ͥܶષٝ᜶ધӧᖣÿЪˀЊήъӵÿౝݶϡуͥ ࢎϖêڅ࠲࿌ᝃ௳ˬǹಐख Њᄚɿቂᑸω ቂϛʐɿ̈ʓ̆ӟ୯́ݡǹಐखê ᄬӟ୯ˬǹಐख ᆝਪ፟݀ܶê ௱αϐశˬ
866HQDWRU'LDQQH)HLQVWHLQ W*RYHUQRU*DYLQ1HZVRP/ ۃቂᑸωͥ 0D\RU(G/HH ֝Ͽʣʖ໘ $VVHPEO\PHPEHU'DYLG&KLX׃ө ʓᗟͥͻӟ୯ &$7D[%RDUG0HPEHU)LRQD0Dڅ 6XSHUYLVRU.DW\7DQJ ˬǹಐख 6XSHUYLVRU6FRWW:HLQHU 6XSHUYLVRU0DUN)DUUHOO $VVHVVRU5HFRUGHU&DUPHQ&KX 6DQ)UDQFLVFR'HPRFUDWLF3DUW\ $VLDQ3DFLILF'HPRFUDWLF&OXE টಸ &KLQHVH$PHULFDQۃਿϴ ׃өۃͥ /W*RYHUQRU 'HPRFUDWLF&OXE *DYLQ1HZVRP 0D\RU(G/HH 6385 6)3ROLFH2IILFHUV$VVRFLDWLRQ San Francisco Chamber RI&RPPHUFH 6DQ)UDQFLVFR$VVRFLDWLRQ RI5HDOWRUV ୦ᙰ࢝ ̷ϴͧനұϿ࢝ ыࡪ৪Ꭹ ͥᙰ࢝ $VVHPEO\PHPEHU &$7D[%RDUG0HPEHU $VVHVVRU5HFRUGHU 6XSHUYLVRU SF Parent Pac ၱ'DYLG&KLX ਡ̜ේ)LRQD0D Ѝ࿃̂&DUPHQ&KX ೣఝ༇.DW\7DQJ 6)%XLOGLQJDQG&RQVWUXFWLRQےڿ 7UDGHV&RXQFLO www.SFRealHousingSolutions.com ᑸຽèʓᗟͥۃॳ༲Ԁʓᗟͥфܶᖆè֝ˬ0ಐख̥́èʓᗟͥܶнᑸຽèʓᗟͥౝ֝ͅݡᚯᅎ դв9VILY[9VZHUPH̷֝ϴϚୖʇքᙰᖆ࢝ۂᗹѫê̠࠲ཋ Ϛୖʇքè֝ܶ݀௫ੌ-77*0+ ኍêދݭ٣нֵ࢝ê˚ෆ৸ੁཋअͅϛZML[OPJZVYN on 425 Market Street, 26th Floor PRSRT STD NO San Francisco, CA 94105 US POSTAGE PAID PROP Pacific Print NO HOUSING MORATORIUMI Resources
Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by California Association of Realtors – Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee and Robert Rosania. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org new affordable homes. fewer homes. of leaders whooppose PropI. to replace housinglost. MORATORIUM ONHOUSING THE NUMBERS
behind the PROP I PROP I ADDS UP TO MORE EXPENSIVE IT GETS HOUSING AND MORE EVICTIONS. WORSE Prop I isn’t just a bad solution to our housing crisis — it creates new problems too.
The moratorium is so poorly Prop I will immediately halt development of nearly 1,500 1,495 new homes,1 including hundreds of affordable homes. drafted that it violates numerous laws and will be in expensive litigation for years. And it stops the repair and And Prop I doesn’t do anything to replace the homes lost. In fact, it reconstruction of damaged, ZERO doesn’t require the building of a single new unit of affordable housing.2 dangerous structures.
“ A moratorium on Just replacing the homes lost through new units simply $1 billion Prop I could cost taxpayers up to $1 billion.3 makes housing less available — and makes it likely that Senator Dianne Feinstein, Mayor Ed Lee, the Bay Area Renters’ Federation, the more people will be hundreds San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, dozens of community organizations displaced. Prop I is a and hundreds of SF residents agree: Prop I is wrong for San Francisco. short-sighted proposal that will only make the housing situation worse.” No matter how you do the math, Prop I will make the housing situation worse. —GABRIEL METCALF PRESIDENT AND CEO OF SPUR AND SAN FRANCISCO VOTE NO ON PROP I ON NOVEMBER 3 HOUSING EXPERT
1Memo RE: Mission District Housing Moratorium, San Francisco Planning Department, July 2015;2Read the full legislation here: sfgov2.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/elections/candidates/Nov2015/MissionBuildingMoratorium_Text.pdf;3Estimated based on SFRealHousingSolutions.com the costs of recently-completed affordable housing projects. “Affordable Housing Production Summary, Fiscal Year 2013-2014 & 2014-2015,” Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure, June 16, 2015. www.SFRealHousingSolutions.com
Take a Closer Look at How the Housing Moratorium Will Hurt Renters and All San Franciscans
We need more housing — not a moratorium on housing that will stop the construction of new affordable homes.
Prop I immediately stops the completion of nearly 1,500 vitally needed new homes — including hundreds of affordable homes.
The experts, groups and leaders who have taken the closest look at Prop I know it will make the problem of displacement worse and could cost taxpayers billions. Join Senator Dianne Feinstein, Mayor Ed Lee, Board of Equalization Member Fiona Ma, Supervisors Katy Tang, Scott Wiener, and Mark Farrell, the San Francisco Democratic Party, the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, the Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club, the Asian Pacific Democratic Club, the San Francisco Young Democrats and so many others in saying: NO on PROP NO HOUSING MORATORIUMI We need more affordable housing in San Francisco, and the Housing Moratorium, Proposition I, will only make the problems of available, affordable housing and displacement worse — for the entire city. Prop I – By the Numbers:
1,495 Number of new homes that Prop I will stop from being built Hundreds Number of much-needed, affordable new homes that will be lost under Prop I Zero Number of homes and apartments damaged by fire or in grave disrepair that could be repaired under Prop I Over $1 billion Cost to taxpayers to replace the homes lost under Prop I ??? Years that such a poorly written measure will be held up in costly litigation NO on PROP NO HOUSING MORATORIUMI
Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by Robert Rosania and Seth Mallen. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org
www.SFRealHousingSolutions.com on 425 Market Street, 26th Floor PRSRT STD NO San Francisco, CA 94105 US POSTAGE PAID PROP Pacific Print NO HOUSING MORATORIUMI Resources
Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by California Association of RealtorsRealtors – IssuesI Mobilization Political Action Committee and National Association of Realtors. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org Get ready for I sticker shock. BREAKING NEWS EVEN PROP I PROPONENTS ADMIT HOUSING MORATORIUM WOULD COST TAXPAYERS BIG
WHO OPPOSES PROP I? The price is too Opponents of Prop I include a wide coalition of leading community high on Prop I. organizations and elected officials who all agree: Prop I will make our PROP I, THE HOUSING MORATORIUM, would immediatelyely halt development housing problems worse. of nearly 1,500 new homes, including hundreds of affordablele homes. 1 Senator Dianne Feinstein And it gets worse if you look at the price tag. Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom Prop I’s proponents recently admitted that the Housing Moratoriumatorium would would come come Mayor Ed Lee with a big cost to San Francisco taxpayers. 2 San Francisco Democratic Party A complete analysis of the cost of replacing the lost homes withth taxpayer-fundedtaxpayer-fund d homes San Francisco shows it will be over $1 billion. 3 (The people behind Prop I say it will “only be” Chronicle $600 million, but their numbers, like their arguments, are not rooted in basic math. 4 ) Mission Democratic Club But even if you accept the lowest cost estimates, that’s hundreds of millions of dollars in San Francisco Bay Area new costs with no clear plan on how to pay for it — except to stick taxpayers with the tab. Renters Federation San Francisco Housing Action Coalition Fewer homes. Higher costs. A one billion dollar price tag. San Francisco Chamber of Commerce VOTE NO ON PROP I ON NOVEMBER 3. San Francisco Police Officers Association Visit SFRealHousingSolutions.com for more information.
And so many more! See the full list 1 Memo RE: Mission District Housing Moratorium, San Francisco Planning Department, July 2015 at SFRealHousingSolutions.com/ 2 Mission advocates hatch half-billion-dollar plan if housing moratorium succeeds,”San Francisco Business Times,October 15,2015, bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2015/10/mission-moratorium-affordable-housing-plan-campos.html Endorsements. 3 Calculated based on the city-reported 1,500 units that will be lost under Prop I, and the cost estimates of recently-constructed city-fund affordable homes as reported in “Affordable Housing Production Summary, Fiscal Year 2013-2014 & 2015-2016,” City and County of San Francisco Office of Community Investment 4 “Mission advocates hatch half-billion-dollar plan if housing moratorium succeeds,”San Francisco Business Times,October 15,2015, bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2015/10/mission-moratorium-affordable-housing-plan-campos.html.
San Francisco for Real Housing Solutions, No on I 0DUNHW6WWKÁRRU San Francisco, CA 94105 TAKE A CLOSER LOOK AT PROP I San Francisco’s Chief Economist took a close look at Prop I—the Housing Moratorium. He found that Prop I would lead to fewer homes and higher prices.1 For renters, it’s a double hit. Rents go up and available apartments are harder to find, adding to financial stress.2 And Prop I won’t do anything to prevent displacements or discourage gentrification. In fact, Prop I stops the building of 1,500 new homes including hundreds of affordable homes, and it doesn’t require building one single new affordable home.3
Join Supervisor Scott Wiener, Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club, the Bay Area Reporter and many others, including:
e U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein e San Francisco Young Democrats e Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom e SF Housing Action Coalition e Mayor Ed Lee e The housing experts at SPUR e Assemblymember David Chiu e Mission Democratic Club e Supervisor Katy Tang e SF Bay Area Renters Federation e Supervisor Mark Farrell e Willie B. Kennedy Democratic Club e San Francisco Chronicle e Black Young Democrats of SF e San Francisco Democratic Party e Sun Reporter And say No to Prop I on November 3. www.SFRealHousingSolutions.com Paid for by San Franciscans for Real Housing Solutions, No on I, sponsored by San Francisco Housing Action Coalition, the San Francisco Alliance for Jobs and Sustainable Growth, the San Francisco Association of Realtors, and housing builders FPPC ID# 1374554. Major funding by California Association of Realtors – Issues Mobilization Political Action Committee and National Association of Realtors. Financial disclosures available at sfethics.org 1 Read the report, “Potential Effects of Limiting Market-Rate Housing in the Mission,” here: http://www.sfrealhousingsolutions.com/report; 2 Table 7, “Impact on Housing Prices of a Moratorium and Indefinite Prohibition on Market-Rate Housing in the Mission,” of the report, “Potential Effects of Limiting Market-Rate Housing in the Mission,” City and County of San Francisco Controller’s Office, September 10, 2015; 3 Memo RE: Mission District Housing Moratorium, San Francisco Planning Department, July 2015.