Unmanned Aerial System Derived Multi-Spectral Imagery for the Monitoring of Coastal Dune Plant Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unmanned Aerial System Derived Multi-Spectral Imagery for the Monitoring of Coastal Dune Plant Communities Unmanned Aerial System derived Multi-Spectral Imagery for the Monitoring of Coastal Dune Plant Communities A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at Lincoln University by Michael Fake Lincoln University 2019 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science. Abstract Unmanned Arial System derived Multi-Spectral Imagery for the Monitoring of Coastal Dune Plant Communities by Michael Fake Plant community monitoring was conducted at Kaitorete Spit Scientific Reserve using UAS based remote sensing and traditional field-based techniques. Multispectral, high resolution UAS imagery was used as the basis for image classification. Different classification methods and data manipulation techniques were evaluated in order to present the most accurate representation of plant communities for comparison against those derived from the field data. Overall image classifcation results were on par with those from similar studies, however their suitability for application to the monitoring of the specific environmental and ecological conditions at Kaitorete Spit remains of low confidence. UAS imagery was able to be used to identify coarse scale ecological features which could then be used to define distinct ecological communities in a simlar but not identical manner to that of the field data. At a finer-scale, UAS imagery could detect some, but not all, key ecological features such as individual species or fine-scale indicators of diverse habitat types. Keywords: Remote Sensing, UAS, UAV, Drone, Image Classification, Plant Community, Vegetation, Coastal, Sand Dunes, Ordination, TWINSPAN, Clustering. ii Acknowledgements This thesis was handed in on the very last day of a long and arduous journey. This thesis and the work that it entails are the result of the hard work and dedication of many different people. Without the support of my current supervisors, Dr. Adrian Patterson and Dr. Crile Doscher, this project would likely never have been completed. Without the support of my initial supervisors, Dr. Brad Martin and in particular Dr. Hannah Buckley, I may have not been around to finish it at all. I also thank my friends and family, who supported my through everything all the same. A special thanks to my office-mate, pooh-sticks world champ and best friend, Dr. Jennifer Dent. Without you, we both would have finished long ago but I’d do it all again in a heart beat. I wish to thank the Department of Conservation, who supplied the imagery for this project as part of a wider investigation into the application of UAS imagery. Thankyou also to the Coastal Restoration Trust of New Zealand, who generously awarded a young and naive student the 2014 Postgraduate Study Award. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to all those who bravley joined me out in the field. These kind people (mostly) non-begrudgingly were dragged out to a cold and windswept beach to hunt for venomous spiders and to follow me around as I pretended to know what I was doing. iii Table of Contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Remote Sensing in Ecology .......................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Unmanned Aerial Systems ........................................................................................... 3 1.2 Vegetation Classification ...........................................................................................................5 1.2.1 Methods of Image Classification .................................................................................. 5 1.2.2 Spectral and Spatial Resolution in Image Classification ............................................... 7 1.3 Community Analyses with Remote Sensing ..............................................................................8 1.4 Remote Sensing of Sand Dune Environments ..........................................................................9 1.5 The rationale for the study .................................................................................................... 11 1.5.1 Aims and objectives ...................................................................................................12 1.5.2 Thesis structure ..........................................................................................................12 Chapter 2 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Site Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Data collection ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Vegetation Surveys ....................................................................................................17 2.2.2 Image Acquisition .......................................................................................................17 2.3 GIS Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 17 2.3.1 Image Preparation......................................................................................................18 2.3.2 Preliminary Image Analysis ........................................................................................23 2.3.3 Final classification and feature extraction .................................................................28 2.4 Statistical analysis .................................................................................................................. 29 2.4.1 Clustering and Ordinations ........................................................................................30 Chapter 3 Results .................................................................................................................... 33 3.1 Image Analysis and Preparation ............................................................................................ 33 3.1.1 Georeferencing ..........................................................................................................33 3.1.2 Vegetation indices ......................................................................................................33 3.1.3 Composite Band Creation ..........................................................................................34 3.1.4 Image Classification Testing .......................................................................................34 3.2 Final Classification .................................................................................................................. 36 3.2.1 Classification Inputs ...................................................................................................36 3.2.2 Final Classification Accuracy Results ..........................................................................36 3.3 Community Analyses .............................................................................................................. 39 3.3.1 Species presence ........................................................................................................39 3.3.2 Field Based Plant Community Analysis ......................................................................40 3.3.3 GIS 0.1 m Resolution Based Plant Community Analysis ............................................43 3.3.4 GIS 0.3 m Resolution Based Plant Community Analysis ............................................47 3.3.5 GIS 0.5 m Resolution Based Plant Community Analysis ............................................50 iv 3.3.6 GIS 1 m Resolution Based Plant Community Analysis................................................54 3.4 Comparison of field and GIS data community analysis ......................................................... 57 3.4.1 Ecological meaning of the cluster divisions ...............................................................57 Chapter 4 Discussion ............................................................................................................... 61 4.1 The suitability for UAS Remote Sensing for monitoring Kaitorete Spit ................................. 61 4.1.1 The scale of ecological phenomena at Kaitorete Spit ................................................61 4.1.2 Detectable indicators of community division and health ..........................................62 4.1.3 Non-detectable indicators of community division and health ..................................69 4.2 Factors in the final results .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Muehlenbeckia Astonii Petrie), a Nationally Threatened Plant
    Re-establishment of the shrubby tororaro (Muehlenbeckia astonii Petrie), a nationally threatened plant SCIENCE & RESEARCH INTERNAL REPORT 188 David A Norton Published by Department of Conservation PO Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand Science & Research Internal Reports are written by DOC staff or contract scientists on matters which are on-going within the Department They include reports on conferences, workshops, and study tours, and also work in progress Internal Reports are not normally subject to peer review This report was prepared for publication by DOC Science Publishing, Science & Research Unit; editing and layout by Ian Mackenzie Publication was approved by the Manager, Science & Research Unit, Science Technology and Information Services, Department of Conservation, Wellington This report was prepared by David A Norton, Conservation Research Group, School of Forestry, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand © June 2001, Department of Conservation ISSN 01142798 ISBN 0478220324 Cataloguing-in-Publication data Norton, David A (David Andrew), 1958- Re-establishment of the shrubby tororaro (Muehlenbeckia astonii Petrie), a nationally threatened plant / David A Norton Wellington, NZ : Dept of Conservation, 2001 1 v ; 30 cm (Science & Research internal report, 0114-2798 ; 188) Includes bibliographical references ISBN 0478220324 1 Muehlenbeckia astonii 2 Rare plantsNew Zealand I Title Series: Science and Research internal report ; 188 CONTENTS Abstract 5 1 Introduction 6 2 Study species and area 7 3 Methods
    [Show full text]
  • LIZARD GARDENS ‒ a Planting Guide
    LIZARD GARDENS – A Planting Guide New Zealand’s skinks and geckos have experienced chronic decline in the face of introduced pests, namely rats, pet cats, mice, hedgehogs and mustelids (stoats, ferrets and weasels). These days most peoples’ experience of lizards is via the one their cat brought in. This will continue to be the norm, unless we do something about it! The three main things you can do to help skinks and geckos in your backyard are to provide food, shelter and undertake pest control. Food: berries and nectar from fruiting and flowering native plants, insects and moisture i.e. lots of mulch. Shelter: rock piles, rotting logs, driftwood, stacks of timber, retaining walls, don’t throw out your prunings, dump them in a pile out of the way, skinks will thank you for it. Pest control: get trapping! Trapping rats and mice is a start but hedgehogs are actually a real problem for lizards in urban settings. Consider getting a DOC200 to trap those spiny pests. You can bury them under your native plants to provide an excellent source of fertiliser. Bait is effective for rodents in particular, and means you don’t have to deal with dead bodies. Also, keep your cat inside at night and consider not replacing it when it dies. To help you get started, this planting guide has been developed by gardeners and conservationists from the Kāpiti Coast. We live in a harsh coastal sand environment battered by salt spray, high wind and regular droughts. The following plant list has been developed with that in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greening the City: Bringing Biodiversity Back Into the Urban
    Section 2: Nature Friendly Environments — Communities Making it Happen Saving threatened native plant species in cities — from traffic islands to real islands John Sawyer Department of Conservation, Wellington Conservancy, PO Box 5086, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] ABSTRACT While offshore islands offer a more traditional option for native plant conservation in New Zealand, urban landscapes including traffic islands and road reservations are now being used in the Wellington region as an integral part of plant species recovery. Urban environments offer areas of public land where plants can be grown on a long-term basis. For many years exotic plants have dominated urban plantings, but increasingly native plants are being used. In Wellington and Hutt City, threatened native plants are now integrated within city plantings. When a council revegetates its urban areas native plant species offer many advantages over exotics. When threatened plant species are used there are even greater gains in terms of contribution towards protecting New Zealand’s unique plant life. Threatened native plants grown in traffic islands are used as: • Insurance populations in case the wild population is destroyed • A research and educational resource • A source of seeds and plants to be used in species recovery work in the wild • An advocacy tool to promote the region’s rare plant life. Threatened plant species grown in traffic islands can be valuable components of a plant conservation programme, and can also be attractive parts of the urban landscape. They can be well protected from browsing animals, such as possums, by the surrounding roads. Council staff can also keep the islands free of weeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Native Planting on Dry Hills and Terraces
    Restoring Native Vegetation on South Marlborough Low Lying Hill Slopes Marlborough District Council – Tui to Town Project – June 2008 A number of property owners have expressed an interest in restoring native vegetation on the low lying hill slopes in and around the Wairau and Awatere Plain areas. Originally, a mosaic of forest types would have been present on these hills. In some cases the hill slopes retain some scattered native vegetation – while others are completely bare and are sometimes scarred by erosion. The local soils and climate combine to make these hill slopes a harsh environment in which to establish plants. However there are some native plant species adapted to surviving in the tough conditions of south Marlborough, and a number of species are worth trying to establish. Observing where there are plants already surviving should give some clues as to what might do well. Plant growth rates will be relatively slow compared to less exposed, more fertile sites on the plains. On dry sunny north facing slopes characteristic Marlborough dryland “grey scrub” plants will be the main vegetation able to be re-established. On cooler south facing slopes and in moister gullies a greener broadleaved forest can be established over time. Species on this dry north facing slope include some typical Moister gullies will support species such as mahoe, five dryland “grey scrub” species”, prostrate kowhai, silver finger, kohuhu, akiraho, tree hebe, while kanuka and tussock, Muehlenbeckia astonii and porcupine shrub “grey scrub” species persist on the dryer exposed (Melicytus Waipapa). slopes. Suitable Species The species that have survived on these hill slopes and which offer the best options for re-establishment include:- kanuka (Kunzea ericoides), Prostrate kowhai (Sophora prostrata), matagouri (Discaria toumatou), Coastal shrub daisy (Olearia solandri), shrubby totoraro (Muehlenbeckia astonii), akiraho (Olearia paniculata) and wiggy wig (Muehlenbeckia complexa), Coprosma species (C.
    [Show full text]
  • Planting Natives at Twizel and Lake Ohau
    Planting natives at Twizel and Lake Ohau Introduction The planting guide provides information for property owners in Twizel and at Lake Ohau who want to plant natives in their gardens that reflect the natural local environment. Native plants currently or previously found in Twizel and Lake Ohau will have adapted to the local soil and climatic conditions. There will be different niches for different plants, such as a damper hollow, the south side of a ridge that is protected from the predominant NW wind and dry open flat land for example. Different native plants will naturally grow better if planted in the type of habitat that suits them. The addition of fertiliser and water will help almost all native plants to thrive as will the reduction of competition from other plants and weeds. Pukaki Scientific Reserve General information about planting natives Preparation of a site for planting If you are establishing a new garden for plants – dig over the site to remove grass cover/weeds, add compost/fertiliser such as blood and bone and ensure the soil is moist but not saturated. For individual plants – clear an area around the planting spot of about 600mm to 1m diameter depending on the size of the plant. Dig holes that are 2x width and depth of the rootball. Loosen the sides and bottom of the hole and remove large stones. Keep dirt excavated from the hole for backfill. Mark out where the plants are to be planted with a spacing between larger trees of 2.5 to 3m and between smaller trees, shrubs and herbs of 1.5 to 2m.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Native Ecosystem Plan for Cape Palliser – Te Mātakitaki a Kupe 2017-2020
    Key Native Ecosystem Plan for Cape Palliser – Te Mātakitaki a Kupe 2017-2020 Contents 1. The Key Native Ecosystem Programme 1 2. Cape Palliser - Te Mātakitaki a Kupe Key Native Ecosystem 2 3. Landowners, management partners and stakeholders 3 4. Ecological values 5 5. Threats to ecological values at the KNE site 10 6. Management objectives 13 7. Management activities 13 8. Operational plan 14 9. Funding contributions 15 Appendix 1: Site maps 16 Appendix 2: Nationally threatened species list 21 Appendix 3: Regionally threatened plant species list 24 References 26 Cape Palliser - Te Mātakitaki a Kupe 1. The Key Native Ecosystem Programme The Wellington region’s native biodiversity has declined since people arrived and the ecosystems that support it face ongoing threats and pressures. Regional councils have responsibility for maintaining indigenous biodiversity, as well as protecting significant vegetation and habitats of threatened species, under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Greater Wellington Regional Council’s (Greater Wellington) Biodiversity Strategy1 sets a framework that guides how Greater Wellington protects and manages biodiversity in the Wellington region to work towards the vision below. Greater Wellington’s vision for biodiversity Healthy ecosystems thrive in the Wellington region and provide habitat for native biodiversity The Strategy provides a common focus across the council’s departments and guides activities relating to biodiversity. The vision is underpinned by four operating principles and three strategic goals. Of these, goal one drives the delivery of the Key Native Ecosystem (KNE) Programme. Goal One Areas of high biodiversity value are protected or restored The KNE Programme is a non-regulatory voluntary programme that seeks to protect some of the best examples of original (pre-human) ecosystem types in the Wellington region by managing, reducing, or removing threats to their ecological values.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Germination, Dormancy and Longevity in the Endangered Shrub Muehlenbeckia Astonii (Polygonaceae)
    New Zealand Journal of Botany ISSN: 0028-825X (Print) 1175-8643 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzb20 Seed germination, dormancy and longevity in the endangered shrub Muehlenbeckia astonii (Polygonaceae) Debra M. Wotton To cite this article: Debra M. Wotton (2018) Seed germination, dormancy and longevity in the endangered shrub Muehlenbeckiaastonii (Polygonaceae), New Zealand Journal of Botany, 56:3, 331-341, DOI: 10.1080/0028825X.2018.1491862 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2018.1491862 Published online: 23 Jul 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 85 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzb20 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF BOTANY 2018, VOL. 56, NO. 3, 331–341 https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2018.1491862 SHORT COMMUNICATION Seed germination, dormancy and longevity in the endangered shrub Muehlenbeckia astonii (Polygonaceae) Debra M. Wottona,b,c aMoa’s Ark Research, Paraparaumu, New Zealand; bBiological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand; cLandcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Muehlenbeckia astonii Petrie (Polygonaceae) is a nationally Received 27 October 2017 endangered shrub undergoing widespread recruitment failure in Accepted 19 June 2018 the wild. Seed germination, dormancy and longevity were ASSOCIATE EDITOR investigated to determine factors potentially constraining Janice Lord M. astonii regeneration and population persistence. Muehlenbeckia astonii seeds were collected from restoration plants sourced from KEYWORDS Kaitorete Spit, Canterbury. Germination percentage of untreated Cold-stratification; New control seeds in a growth room (20 °C with 16 hours of light daily) Zealand; regeneration; seed was compared with that of seeds in two treatments: (1) chilled at persistence; soil seed bank; 4 °C for 2 weeks; and (2) chilled for 12 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Planting Guide
    Native Planting Guide for Lincoln and other Selwyn Communities produced for the Lincoln Envirotown Trust by Maria Ignatieva, Colin Meurk and Glenn Stewart Lincoln University New Zealand Research Centre for Urban Ecology Landcare Research. Edition 2019 www.lincolnenvirotown.org Geological and Biological History of the Canterbury Plains ........................................... 4 Pre-Maori Native Vegetation and Flora ........... 5 Pre-European Native Vegetation and Flora ...... 6 Current Status of the Local Vegetation and Flora .................................................................. 7 LIUDD Principles ............................................. 8 Low Impact Urban Design and Development .. 8 Natural Patterns ............................................ 9 Which Plant Species, Where? ...................... 10 Streams, Waterways & Treatment Trains ... 10 Green Roofs ................................................ 10 Rain Gardens ............................................... 12 Swales ........................................................ 13 Ponds/Stream Banks/Riparian Zones ............ 13 Streets & Parks ............................................. 14 Street Trees & Parklands .............................. 14 Roundabouts & Portals ................................ 16 2 House Sections ............................................. 16 Shrubberies ................................................. 16 Trees (over 2.5 m tall) suitable for limited space ... 16 Shrubs (woody plants less than 2.5 m tall) ........... 18 Hedges ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosytem Services: the Value of Native New Zealand Plants
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Ecosytem services provided by native New Zealand plants in vineyards A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Jean-Marie Tompkins Lincoln University 2010 ii Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ecosystem services provided by native New Zealand plants in vineyards by Jean-Marie Tompkins This thesis investigates the value of native New Zealand plants within the agricultural landscape of the Waipara District, Canterbury Province, New Zealand with regards to their provision of ecosystem services (ES). ES have undergone extensive study with the conclusion that they are vital to maintain and improve the productivity of agricultural systems. Today, as concerns about the continued loss of biodiversity caused by agriculture mount, there is an urgent need to understand further the value of native plants. An appreciation of the ES which native plants provide would give cause for their conservation and restoration; as these services may improve agricultural sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Anatomy of Polygonaceae: Analysis of a Family with Exceptional Wood Diversity
    Botanical Journal of the Lirtneon Society. 2003. 141. 25—51. With 59 figures Wood anatomy of Polygonaceae: analysis of a family with exceptional wood diversity SHERWIN CARLQUIST FLS Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93105, USA Received May 2002; accepted for publication August 2002 Quantitative and qualitative data are presented for woods of 30 species of woody Polygonaceae. Wood features that ally Polx’gonaceae with Plumbaginaceae include nonbordered perforation plates, storeing in narrow vessels and axial parenchyma, septate or nucleate fibres, vasicentric parenchyma, pith bundles that undergo secondary growth, silica bodies, and ability to form successive cambia. These features are consistent with pairing of Plumbaginaceae and Polgonaceae as sister families. Wood features that ally Polygonaceae with Rhabdodendraceae include nonbor dered perforation plates, presence of vestured pits in vessels, presence of silica bodies and dark-staining compounds in ray cells, and ability to form successive cambia. Of the features listed above, nonbordered perforation plates and ability to form successive cambia may be symplesiomorphies basic to Caryophyllales sensu lato. The other features are more likely to be synapomorphies. Wood data thus support molecular cladograms that show the three families near the base of Caryophyllales si. Chambered crystals are common to three genera of the family and may indicate relationship. Ray histology suggests secondary woodiness in Antigonon, Atraphaxis, Bilderdyhia, Dedeckera, En ogonun-i, Hanfordia, Muehlenbechia, Polygonum, and Rumex. Other genera of the family show little or no evidence of secondary woodiness. Molecular data are needed to confirm this interpretation and to clarify the controversial sys tematic groupings within the family proposed by various authors.
    [Show full text]
  • SILVER TUSSOCK, Tree Weta, Gentle Rolling Ecosystem
    Food : for native birds , SILVER TUSSOCK, tree weta, F = Fruit S = Bird Seed N = Nectar gentle rolling ecosystem B = Bud/foliage I = Insects For lizards , L = fruit * = to establish, protect from frost; t = toxic for toddlers Plant tolerances ■ = tolerates or needs □ = intolerant ½ = tolerant of some PLANT LISTS Plants natural to these mid-elevation, winter wet/summer dry, gently sloping, Takahe soils on loess colluvium Tolerances TALL TREES Food sun shade wet dry wind Podocarpus hallii mountain totara F,B,I ■ ½ ■ ■ ■ Podocarpus totara totara F ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ Prumnopitys taxifolia matai, black pine F ■ ½ ■ ½ ■ TREES & TALL SHRUBS Coprosma lucida shining karamu F ½ ■ ½ ½ ■ Coprosma robusta karamu F ■ ■ ■ ½ ½ Cordyline australis ti kouka, cabbage tree F,N,I ■ ½ ■ ■ ■ Discaria toumatou matagouri I ■ □ ½ ■ ■ Dodonaea viscosa akeake* I □ ½ □ □ □ Griselinia littoralis kapuka, broadleaf F,I ■ ■ ½ ■ ■ Hoheria angustifolia houhere, narrow-leaved lacebark (semi-dec) I ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ Kunzea ericoides kanuka I ■ □ □ ■ ■ Leptospermum scoparium manuka, tea tree N,I ■ ■ ■ ■ Lophomyrtus obcordata rohutu, NZ myrtle F,I ½ ■ ½ ½ ■ Melicope simplex poataniwha F,I ½ ■ ½ ½ ■ Melicytus ramiflorus mahoe, whiteywood* F,L,I ½ ■ ½ ½ ½ Myoporum laetum ngaio* F,I ■ ½ □ ■ ■ t Myrsine australis mapou, red matipo F,I ■ ■ ■ ■ Olearia paniculata akiraho, golden akeake I,S ■ ½ □ ■ ■ Pennantia corymbosa kaikomako, ducksfeet (slow growing) F,N,I ½ ■ ■ ½ ½ Pittosporum eugenioides tarata, lemonwood F ■ ■ ■ ■ Pittosporum tenuifolium kohuhu, black matipo/mapau, tawhari F,I ■ ■ ½ ■ ■ Plagianthus regius manatu, lowland ribbonwood (deciduous) I,B ■ ½ ½ ½ ■ Pseudopanax arboreus whauwhaupaku, fivefinger F,N,I ■ ■ □ ½ ½ Pseudopanax crassifolius horoeka, lancewood F,N,B,I ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ Solanum laciniatum poroporo F ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ t Sophora microphylla South Island kowhai N,B ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ t SHRUBS & FLAX-LIKE PLANTS Carmichaelia australis NZ shrub broom S,I ■ □ □ ■ ■ Coprosma crassifolia thick-leaved mikimiki F,L ■ ½ ½ ■ ■ Coprosma aff.
    [Show full text]