DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophers for Leave to File James J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Philosophers for Leave to File James J FILED: APPELLATE DIVISION - 1ST DEPT 07/17/2020 05:31 PM 2020-02581 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/17/2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Order to Show Cause, Case No.: 2020-02581 THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf of HAPPY, Index No.: 260441/2019 (Bronx County) Petitioner-Appellant, NOTICE OF MOTION -against- OF PHILOSOPHERS FOR LEAVE TO FILE JAMES J. BREHENY, in his official capacity as the BRIEF AS AMICI Executive Vice President and General Director of Zoos CURIAE and Aquariums of the Wildlife Conservation Society and Director of the Bronx Zoo, and WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY, Respondents-Respondents. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the annexed affirmation of Amy Trakinski, dated July 16, 2020, the undersigned will move this Court, on behalf of Gary Comstock, Ph.D., G.K.D. Crozier, Ph.D., Andrew Fenton, Ph.D., Tyler John, L. Syd M Johnson, Ph.D., Robert C. Jones, Ph.D., Letitia Meynell, Ph.D., Nathan Nobis, Ph.D., David Peña-Guzmán, Ph.D., James Rocha, Ph.D., Bernard Rollin, Ph.D., and Jeff Sebo, Ph.D. (collectively, “Philosophers”), at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Judicial Department, at the Courthouse located at 27 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, for an order granting leave to file the 1 annexed brief as Amici Curiae in support of the Pctitioner-Appellant, the Nonhuman Ri ghts Projcrt, Inc., in tht;: aoovc--(:aptiol1cd action. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE, that the motion is returnable at 10 o'clock in the forenoon on July 27, 2020, which is at least 9 days from the date of service of these papers. Panies are hereby advised that arguments will be on the papers and no appearonce is required or permiucd. Dated: July 16,2020 BY~.......M,lYTRAK· K1 165 West 91'" Strect, Apt. 168 New York, New York 10024 (917)902-28 13 [email protected] Attorney for Amici Curiae Cliry Comstock. Ph.D.. C.K.D. Crozier, PhD.. AI/drew Fenton. Ph.D. Tyler John. L. Syd M Johnson. Ph.D. Robert C. JOlles. PhD.. Letilia Meynell, Ph.D., Nathall Nobis. PhD., David Pefia-CIIZr1ll11l. Ph.D.. James Rocha. "11.0.. Bemard Rollill. Pho. U/7d JeffSebo, PhD. NOTICE (VIA NYSCEF) TO: New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division - First Dcpanment Clerk's Office 27 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10010 (2 12) 340-0400 2 Elizabeth Stein, Esq. 5 Dunhill Road New Hyde Park, NY 11040 (516) 747-4726 [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner-Appellant Steven M. Wise, Esq. 5195 NW 112th Terrace Coral Springs, FL 33076 (954) 646-9864 [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner-Appellant PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP Kenneth A. Manning, Esq. ([email protected]) Joanna J. Chen, Esq. ([email protected]) William V. Rossi, Esq. ([email protected]) 125 Main Street Buffalo, New York 14203 (716) 847-8400 Attorneys for Respondents-Respondents 3 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Order to Show Cause, Case No.: 2020-02581 THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf Index No.: 260441/2019 of HAPPY, (Bronx County) Petitioner-Appellant, AFFIRMATION OF AMY TRAKINSKI -against- IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF JAMES J. BREHENY, in his official capacity as the PHILOSOPHERS Executive Vice President and General Director of Zoos FOR LEAVE TO FILE and Aquariums of the Wildlife Conservation Society and BRIEF AS AMICI Director of the Bronx Zoo, and WILDLIFE CURIAE CONSERVATION SOCIETY, Respondents-Respondents. I, Amy Trakinski, hereby affirm under penalty of perjury: 1. I am an attorney duly admitted to practice in the courts of the State of New York. I submit this affirmation on behalf of Gary Comstock, Ph.D., G.K.D. Crozier, Ph.D., Andrew Fenton, Ph.D., Tyler John, L. Syd M Johnson, Ph.D., Robert C. Jones, Ph.D., Letitia Meynell, Ph.D., Nathan Nobis, Ph.D., David Peña-Guzmán, Ph.D., James Rocha, Ph.D., Bernard Rollin, Ph.D., and Jeff Sebo, Ph.D. (collectively, “Philosophers”) in support of their motion to submit the attached brief as Amici Curiae in support of the Petitioner-Appellant Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. (“NhRP”) in the above-captioned proceedings. I am not a party to 1 this proceeding nor do I represent any of the parties to it. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is the Order appealed from. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is the Notice of Appeal. 2. The Philosophers have expertise in animal ethics, political theory, the philosophy of animal cognition and behavior, and the philosophy of biology and seek to submit an amicus brief in support of the NhRP’s efforts to secure habeas corpus relief for Happy. Collectively, the Philosophers have long-standing interests in the ethical and legal duties to animals and share a commitment to rejecting arbitrary distinctions used prejudicially to protect humans without protecting other animals. They seek to submit their brief as Amici Curiae because of their interest in ensuring the law is applied and interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the best philosophical standards of rational judgment and ethical standards of justice. 3. The Philosophers were granted leave to file briefs as Amici Curiae in this Court and other appellate courts in New York State in similar cases, including the Court of Appeals. 4. Gary L. Comstock is professor of philosophy at North Carolina State University where he conducts research on ethical questions in the biological sciences. Dr. Comstock received his undergraduate degree from Wheaton College and his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Chicago. He teaches courses in 2 moral philosophy, taking up subjects to include animal ethics and human medical ethics. He is co-editor of The Moral Rights of Animals (Lexington Press, 2016) and discusses the use of animals in research in his books, Research Ethics: A Philosophical Guide to the Responsible Conduct of Research (Cambridge University Press, 2013), and Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology (Kluwer, 2000). He has written on ethical questions surrounding the study of animal behavior and neuroanatomy, the genetic modification of farm animals, the permissibility of hunting, and animal metacognition. Recent papers take up legal questions concerning the intrinsic value of companion animals and the merits of the philosophical argument for animal personhood from overlapping species. Comstock was ASC Fellow of the National Humanities Center and edited Life Science Ethics (2002, 2010), Is There a Moral Obligation to Save the Family Farm? (1987), and Religious Autobiographies (1994, 2003). He serves on the board of the Culture and Animals Foundation. (CV attached as Exhibit 3). 5. G. K. D. Crozier is a professor in the Department of Philosophy at Laurentian University, and a Canada Research Chair of Environment, Culture and Values. She received her B.A. (Hons.) from McMaster University, her M.A. from the University of Guelph, and her Ph.D. from the University of Western Ontario. Prior to joining Laurentian University in 2011, she undertook a Postdoctoral 3 Fellowship in bioethics in the Novel Tech Ethics research group at Dalhousie University and held a tenure-track position in philosophy at Loyola University in Chicago. Specializing in the philosophy of the life sciences, including bioethics and the philosophy of biology, Dr. Crozier’s manuscripts have been published in top peer-reviewed journals including the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, and the Hastings Centre Report. She has also contributed chapters to edited volumes published by prestigious presses, including Cambridge University Press, Springer, and Routledge. Her manuscripts appear in science journals such as Evolutionary Applications and the American Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, and she been awarded 2.98 million dollars in awards and grants as Principle Investigator or Co-Investigator. Dr. Crozier is a co-founding member of the Centre for Evolutionary Ecology and Ethical Conservation – a multi-disciplinary research center dedicated to theoretical and applied challenges of biodiversity conservation and human-animal relations. Her work involves collaborations with Canada’s Accredited Zoos and Aquariums, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, the Canadian Council on Animal Care, and the Canadian Society for Ecology and Evolution. (CV attached as Exhibit 4). 6. Andrew Fenton is an associate professor in the Department of Philosophy at Dalhousie University. Dr. Fenton received his B.A. (Hons.) in Philosophy and 4 Comparative Religion from Acadia University, his M.A. in Philosophy from Dalhousie University, and his Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of Calgary. He has been a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Novel Tech Ethics research group at Dalhousie University and is now a team member. Dr. Fenton also coordinates the interdisciplinary and transinstitutional Halifax Animal Studies Group in Halifax, Nova Scotia and has been serving on a Canadian Council of Animal Care subcommittee. He primarily teaches in applied ethics but also has taught courses in animal philosophy or animal ethics. He has authored or co- authored papers related to animal philosophy or animal ethics which appear in such journals as Biology and Philosophy, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, ILAR Journal, Journal of Animal Ethics, and The Monist and has chapters on these topics in The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics (co-edited by L. Syd M Johnson and Karen Rommelfanger, Routledge, 2018), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Animal Minds (coedited by Kristin Andrews and Jacob Beck, Routledge, 2018) and the Philosophy of Behavioral Biology (co- edited by Kathryn Plaisance and Thomas Reydon, Springer, 2012).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Untitled Leaves Clues About the Man Whose Portrait He Captured
    October 15, 2016–February 12, 2017 Published on the occasion of the exhibition The New Westward: Trains, Planes, and Automobiles that Move the Modern West organized by the Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block October 15, 2016–February 12, 2017 ©Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block CURATOR AND AUTHOR: Christine C. Brindza, James and Louise Glasser Curator of Art of the American West, Tucson Museum of Art FOREWORD: Jeremy Mikolajczak, Chief Executive Officer EDITOR: Katie Perry DESIGN: Melina Lew PRINTER: Arizona Lithographers, Tucson, Arizona ISBN: 978-0-911611-21-2 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CONTROL NUMBER: 2016947252 Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block 140 North Main Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701 tucsonmuseumofart.org FRONT COVER: Ray Strang (1893–1957), Train Station, c.1950, oil on paper, 14 x 20 in. Collection of the Tucson Museum of Art. Gift of Mrs. Dorothy Gibson. 1981.50.20 CONTENTS 07 Foreword Jeremy Mikolajczak, Chief Executive Officer 09 Author Acknowledgements 11 The New Westward: Trains, Planes, and Automobiles that Move the Modern West Christine C. Brindza 13 Manifest Destiny, Westward Expansion, and Prequels to Western Imagery in the Modern Era 19 Trains: A Technological Sublime 27 Airplanes: Redefining Western Expanses 33 The Automobile: The Great Innovation 39 Works Represented 118 Bibliography 120 Exhibition and Catalogue Sponsors FOREWORD The Tucson Museum of Art is proud to present The New Westward: Trains, Planes, and Automobiles that Move the Modern West, a thematic exhibition examining the role transportation technology has played in the American West in visual art. In today’s fast-moving, digitally-connected world, it is easy to overlook the formative years of travel and the massive overhauls that were achieved for railroads, highways, and aircraft to reach the far extended terrain of the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Farm" Is the Story of a Farm Where the Animals Expelled Their
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/32376 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Vugts, Berrie Title: The case against animal rights : a literary intervention Issue Date: 2015-03-18 Introduction The last four decades have shown an especially intense and thorough academic reflection on the relation between man and animal. This is evidenced by the rapid growth of journals on the question of the animal within the fields of the humanities and social sciences worldwide.1 Yet also outside the academy animals now seem to preoccupy the popular mindset more than ever before. In 2002, the Netherlands was the first country in the world where a political party was established (the so-called “Partij voor de Dieren” or PvdD: Party for the Animals) that focused predominantly on animal issues. Heated discussions about factory-farming, the related spread of diseases (BSE/Q Fever), hunting and fishing practices, the inbreeding of domestic animals, are now commonplace. Animals, as we tend to call a large range of incredibly diverse creatures, come to us in many different ways. We encounter them as our pets and on our plates, animation movies dominate the charts and artists in sometimes rather experimental genres engage in the question of the animal.2 Globally speaking, animals might be considered key players in the climate debate insofar as the alarming rate of extinction of certain species is often taken to be indicative of our feeble efforts at preserving what is commonly referred to as “nature.” At the same time, these rates serve, albeit indirectly, as a grim reminder of the possible end of human existence itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetarian Starter Guide
    do good • fEEL GREAt • LOOK GORGEOUS FREE The VegetarianSTARTER GUIDE YUM! QUICK, EASY, FUN RECIPES +30 MOUTHWATERING MEATLESS MEALS EASy • affordABLE • inspirED FOOD Welcome If you’re reading this, you’ve already taken your first step toward a better you and a better world. Think that sounds huge? It is. Cutting out chicken, fish, eggs and other animal products saves countless animals and is the best way to protect the environment. Plus, you’ll never feel more fit or look more fabulous. From Hollywood A-listers like Kristen Bell and Ellen, to musicians like Ariana Grande and Pink, to the neighbors on your block, plant-based eating is everywhere. Even former president Bill Clinton and rapper Jay-Z are doing it! Millions of people have ditched chicken, fish, eggs and other animal products entirely, and tens of millions more are cutting back. You’re already against cruelty to animals. You already want to eat healthy so you can have more energy, live longer, and lower your risk of chronic disease. Congratulations for shaping up your plate to put your values into action! And here’s the best part: it’s never been easier. With this guide at your fingertips, you’re on your way to a fresher, happier you. And this is just the start. You’ll find more recipes, tips, and personal support online at TheGreenPlate.com. Let’s get started! Your Friends at Mercy For Animals reinvent revitalize rewrite rediscover your routine. With the your body. Healthy, plant- perfection. This isn’t about flavor. Prepare yourself easy tips in this guide, based food can nourish being perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Leslie [email protected]
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2006 | Issue 1 Article 5 Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Leslie [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Leslie, Jeff () "Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2006: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2006/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Lesliet Is it morally acceptable to use animals in scientific experi- ments that will not benefit those animals, but instead solely benefit people? Most people would say yes; but at the same time most would view the use of animals as a regrettable necessity, to be pursued only when the benefits to people outweigh the harm to the animals, and only after everything possible is done to minimize that harm. Identifying benefits and harms may require specialized scientific and technological understanding, to be sure, but evaluating the tradeoff between them requires not technical expertise, but rather the capacity to make difficult moral judg- ments. We do not usually think of moral judgments as the unique terrain of any particular set of professionals or experts. Anyone capable of ethical reasoning has an equal claim to exper- tise, and a pluralistic society can be expected to exhibit a wide range of moral beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    JOSEPH ACQUISTO Professor of French Chair, Department of Romance Languages and Linguistics University of Vermont 517 Waterman Building Burlington, VT 05405 [email protected] (802) 656-4845 EDUCATION Yale University Ph.D., Department of French (2003) M.Phil., French (2000) M.A., French (1998) University of Dayton B.A., summa cum laude, French (1997) B.Mus., summa cum laude, voice performance (1997) EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Chair, Department of Romance Languages and Linguistics, University of Vermont 2016-present Professor of French, University of Vermont 2014-present Associate Professor of French with tenure, University of Vermont 2009-2014 Assistant Professor of French, University of Vermont 2003-2009 BOOKS 7. Poetry’s Knowing Ignorance, under consideration 6. Proust, Music, and Meaning: Theories and Practices of Listening in the Recherche, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. 5. The Fall Out of Redemption: Writing and Thinking Beyond Salvation in Baudelaire, Cioran, Fondane, Agamben, and Nancy. New York: Bloomsbury, 2015. Paperback edition 2016. 4. Poets as Readers in Nineteenth-Century France: Critical Reflections, co-edited volume with Adrianna M. Paliyenko and Catherine Witt. London: Institute of Modern Languages Research, 2015. 3. Thinking Poetry: Philosophical Approaches to Nineteenth-Century French Poetry, edited volume. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 1 2. Crusoes and Other Castaways in Modern French Literature: Solitary Adventures. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2012. Paperback edition 2014. 1. French Symbolist Poetry and the Idea of Music. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006. EDITED SPECIAL ISSUE The Cultural Currency of Nineteenth-Century French Poetry, a special double issue of Romance Studies (26:3-4, July/November 2008) co-edited and prefaced with Adrianna M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ways of Seeing Animals Documenting and Imag(In)Ing the Other in the Digital Turn
    InMedia The French Journal of Media Studies 8.1. | 2020 Ubiquitous Visuality Ways of Seeing Animals Documenting and Imag(in)ing the Other in the Digital Turn Diane Leblond Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/inmedia/1957 DOI: 10.4000/inmedia.1957 ISSN: 2259-4728 Publisher Center for Research on the English-Speaking World (CREW) Electronic reference Diane Leblond, “Ways of Seeing Animals”, InMedia [Online], 8.1. | 2020, Online since 15 December 2020, connection on 26 January 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/inmedia/1957 ; DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4000/inmedia.1957 This text was automatically generated on 26 January 2021. © InMedia Ways of Seeing Animals 1 Ways of Seeing Animals Documenting and Imag(in)ing the Other in the Digital Turn Diane Leblond Introduction. Looking at animals: when visual nature questions visual culture 1 A topos of Western philosophy indexes animals’ irreducible alienation from the human condition on their lack of speech. In ancient times, their inarticulate cries provided the necessary analogy to designate non-Greeks as other, the adjective “Barbarian” assimilating foreign languages to incomprehensible birdcalls.1 To this day, the exclusion of animals from the sphere of logos remains one of the crucial questions addressed by philosophy and linguistics.2 In the work of some contemporary critics, however, the tenets of this relation to the animal “other” seem to have undergone a change in focus. With renewed insistence that difference is inextricably bound up in a sense of proximity, such writings have described animals not simply as “other,” but as our speechless others. This approach seems to find particularly fruitful ground where theory proposes to explore ways of seeing as constitutive of the discursive structures that we inhabit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Programs Have Been Identified As Examples of Successful Practices
    National Leadership Forum Sept. 28, 2006 American Humane’s Getting to Zero Initiative is a critical, national undertaking based on the profound belief that American society can ultimately reduce to zero the number of healthy or treatable dogs, cats and other companion animals that are euthanized in animal care and control facilities. American Humane has made the reduction and eventual practices” in spay/neuter, transfer, adoption, foster care and elimination of shelter and animal control euthanasia of healthy training. Phase Two is this Leadership Forum to shed light on dogs and cats one of its highest priorities. Although many the problem and highlight some of the best practices in use Americans maintain a deep love and affection for animals, and today. Phase Three is the funding and implementation phase. pets are cherished members of millions of families, the millions With funding secured, American Humane will implement the of healthy, adoptable dogs and cats euthanized each year replication and delivery process to facilities, starting initially remains a source of shame for our country. with six animal welfare agencies or consortia of animal care and control entities in six geographic regions in each of the next two In order to combat this problem, American Humane is years, for a total of 12 community-based programs during the committed to helping identify, support and obtain funding for initial phase of the campaign. Animal care and control facilities the replication of community-based interventions that have will apply and be assessed as to their potential to implement the demonstrated success in reducing the euthanasia of healthy or best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of the Meat Paradox
    The Ethics of the Meat Paradox Lars Ursin* The meat paradox—to like eating meat, but dislike killing and harming animals—confronts omnivores with a powerful contradiction between eating and caring for animals. The paradox, however, trades on a conflation of the illegitimacy of harming and killing animals. While harming animals is morally wrong, killing animals can be legitimate if done with minimal suffering and respect for the moral status of the animal. This moral status demands the ac- knowledgement of a certain justification for killing animals that makes modesty a virtue of the omnivore. The psychological problem with regard to killing animals can persist even if the moral tension is weakened, but only to a certain degree, since emotions and principles are interdependent in moral reasoning. Virtuous meat consumption demands a willingness to face the conflicting feelings involved in killing animals and to tolerate the resulting tension. INTRODUCTION Humans and animals interact in a number of ways and establish a diversity of relationships. Humans relate to animals as members of the family, as research objects in the laboratory, as guide dogs, trained animals in sports and shows, and still many other kinds of relations. In some of these relations, animals are edible beings. The relation between humans and animals that are eaten is a special one. Like animals sacrificed for research purposes, the animals we eat are killed by us. The acceptance and legitimacy of this killing is thus an essential part of eating animals. By eating animals, we enter into a very intimate relation with the animal. We eat parts of the animal and digest the parts, thus allowing these parts to be absorbed into our bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaker Concern for Animals
    QUAKER CONCERN FOR ANIMALS www.quaker-animals.org.uk SPRING 2011 To say that we love God and at the same time exercise cruelty towards the least creature is a contradiction in itself John Woolman (1720 – 1772) £1 HOW TO JOIN QUAKER CONCERN FOR ANIMALS Please complete the following form and send to: QCA, PO BOX 136, WIRRAL, CH30 9BZ I wish to become a member/renew membership of QCA. I enclose my yearly subscription of £10, or £5 (concessionary) for 2011. I wish to pay by Standing Order .......................................................................................................... I wish to make a donation of ................................................................................................................ NAME:........................................................................................................................................................ ADDRESS: ................................................................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................... Telephone number, if available: ............................................................................................................. Email address, if available: ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Animal Studies: an Introduction by Dawne Mccance Rosemary-Claire Collard University of Toronto
    The Goose Volume 13 | No. 1 Article 25 8-1-2014 Critical Animal Studies: An Introduction by Dawne McCance Rosemary-Claire Collard University of Toronto Part of the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Literature in English, North America Commons Follow this and additional works at / Suivez-nous ainsi que d’autres travaux et œuvres: https://scholars.wlu.ca/thegoose Recommended Citation / Citation recommandée Collard, Rosemary-Claire. "Critical Animal Studies: An Introduction by Dawne McCance." The Goose, vol. 13 , no. 1 , article 25, 2014, https://scholars.wlu.ca/thegoose/vol13/iss1/25. This article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Goose by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cet article vous est accessible gratuitement et en libre accès grâce à Scholars Commons @ Laurier. Le texte a été approuvé pour faire partie intégrante de la revue The Goose par un rédacteur autorisé de Scholars Commons @ Laurier. Pour de plus amples informations, contactez [email protected]. Collard: Critical Animal Studies: An Introduction by Dawne McCance Made, not born, machines this reduction is accomplished and what its implications are for animal life and Critical Animal Studies: An Introduction death. by DAWNE McCANCE After a short introduction in State U of New York P, 2013 $22.65 which McCance outlines the hierarchical Cartesian dualism (mind/body, Reviewed by ROSEMARY-CLAIRE human/animal) to which her book and COLLARD critical animal studies’ are opposed, McCance turns to what are, for CAS The field of critical animal scholars, familiar figures in a familiar studies (CAS) is thoroughly multi- place: Peter Singer and Tom Regan on disciplinary and, as Dawne McCance’s the factory farm.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Pacific Division Meeting Program 2017
    The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION NINETY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM THE WESTIN SEATTLE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON APRIL 12 – 15, 2017 VIVA VOCE ENTANGLEMENTS Conversations with A System of Philosophy Italian Philosophers Crispin Sartwell Silvia Benso CENTERING NEO-CONFUCIAN AND EXTENDING ECOLOGICAL HUMANISM NEW FORMS An Essay on An Interpretive Engage- OF REVOLT Metaphysical Sense ment with Wang Fuzhi Essays on Kristeva’s Steven G. Smith (1619–1692) Intimate Politics Nicholas S. Brasovan Sarah K. Hansen and Available May 2017 Rebecca Tuvel, editors EDGAR ALLAN POE, Available June 2017 EUREKA, AND GOD AND THE SELF SCIENTIFIC IN HEGEL CONFUCIANISM, A IMAGINATION Beyond Subjectivism HABIT OF THE HEART David N. Stamos Paolo Diego Bubbio Bellah, Civil Religion, Available July 2017 and East Asia SELF-REALIZATION Philip J. Ivanhoe and THROUGH CONFUCIAN ZHUANGZI’S CRITIQUE Sungmoon Kim, editors LEARNING OF THE CONFUCIANS A Contemporary Blinded by the Human ESSAYS ON THE FOUN- Reconstruction of Kim-chong Chong DATIONS OF ETHICS Xunzi’s Ethics Siufu Tang WHITEHEAD’S C. I. Lewis RELIGIOUS THOUGHT John Lange, editor From Mechanism to Available June 2017 POETIC FRAGMENTS Organism, From Force Karoline von Günderrode to Persuasion THE VARIETY OF Translated and with Daniel A. Dombrowski INTEGRAL ECOLOGIES Introductory Essays by Nature, Culture, Anna C. Ezekiel CONFUCIANISM AND and Knowledge AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY in the Planetary Era MOUNTAINS, RIVERS, Mathew A. Foust Sam Mickey, Sean Kelly, AND THE GREAT EARTH and Adam Robbert, Reading
    [Show full text]
  • An Autobiography
    An Autobiography Richard Ryder Devon, England I recoiled at the obvious sufferings of my prey I was chided for being silly. Although it was considered the proper thing to do to kill an animal "cleanly" and to put wounded creatures "out of their misery" swiftly, the basic right of humankind to dominate and tyrannise was not to be challenged. Killing and exploiting animals was something that made a man a man. Yet I never really doubted that we sentients were all alike-and lowe that mainly to my mother. My father, one of the last of the old sort of English squire, owned thousands of acres of willdlife-rich moorland, forestry and farmland, all of which had been Long before I began campaigning against speciesism in the family for generations. He wore the same huge in 1969 I had felt on the same wavelength as other hobnailed shoes and leather-patched tweed jackets sentients. I shared my bedroom with a monkey for decade after decade and ruled his estate wilb a feudal about three years. His name was Bimbo and he had fmnness and sense of duty. He was sometimes fierce been "rescued" by my mother from a pet shop. She but always fair. went on to rescue others, accommodating them in a As part of the "privileged" upper four percent, I was spacious cage in the garden and taking some of them sent to boys' boarding schools between eight and for walks in the woods. We used to have a photograph eighteen where I was caned and bullied and forced to of a South American capuchin swinging at the top of undergo almost continuous physical and mental a British larch tree! hardship.
    [Show full text]