Green Heat and Power

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Heat and Power Bellona Report No 3:1999 Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century T. Palm, C. Buch, B. Kruse, E. Sauar June 1999 English version June 2000 ISBN 82-993138-8-0 ISSN 0806-3451 Published by the Bellona Foundation 4 Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century Preface 6 3.5. Hydrogen production from renewable energy 37 Summary 7 3.5.1. Electrolysis of water 37 3.5.2. Gasification of biomass 37 1. The Energy and Environment Challenge 9 3.5.3. Photoelectrochemical production 37 1.1. Three sources of fossil fuel 9 3.5.4. Photobiological hydrogen production 37 1.1.1. Three key factors 9 3.5.5. Biological hydrogen production from 1.2. Three principle sources of energy in Norway 10 organic wast 38 1.3. Three uses of energy 10 3.5.6. Thermal electrolysis of water 38 1.4. Three key solutions 10 1.4.1. Cleaner fossil fuels 11 1.4.2. Renewable energy 11 4. Energy efficiency on the mainland 39 1.4.3. Energy efficiency 12 4.1. New technology to curb increasing 1.5. Three sources of emissions to the environment 12 consumption of electricity 39 1.5.1. Three major kinds of emissions and their 4.1.1. Using the most appropriate type of energy 39 consequences 12 4.1.2. Increased use of electricity for heating costs 1.5.2. A closer look at greehouse gas emissions more than district heat 40 in Norway 14 4.1.3. Inconsistent regulations hinder district heating 40 4.1.4. Lower power-grid rates for decentralized 2. Fossil fuel 15 electrical power plants 41 2.1. Energy Carriers 15 4.1.5. Prohibition of resistance heaters in new 2.2. Carbon extraction 16 construction except single-family homes 41 2.2.1. Depositing 16 4.1.6. Minimum requirements for electrc lighting 42 2.3. Stationary discharge stations 16 4.1.7. Maximum requirements for power drawn by 2.3.1. Extraction of CO2 from natural gas 17 Limiting the stand-by function on new 2.4. The petroleum industry in Norway 20 electronic equipment 42 2.4.1. Power supply 21 4.2. Cheaper food and clothing - more expensive 2.4.2. Process optimization 23 electricity and wast of energy 42 2.4.3. Zero emissions 24 4.3. New cable technology 42 2.4.4. Localizing new, versus reduced, access to 4.4. Tax loopholes from Sweden and Denmark 43 fossil resources 24 2.4.5. Summary 26 5. Hydrogen and electricity in the 2.5. More on the production of hydrogen transportation sector 44 from fossil fuels 27 5.1. Regulations and taxes force the development 2.5.1. Gasification of coal 27 of new technology 44 2.5.2. Partial oxidation of heavy hydrocarbons 27 5.2. Fuel Cell Cars 45 2.5.3. Steam reforming of natural gas 28 5.3. Hydrogen in Norwegian Transportation 46 2.5.4. Autothermal reforming 28 5.4. Storage 47 2.5.5. Carbon monoxide exchange 28 5.4.1. Compressed Hydrogen 47 2.5.6. The Kværner Carbon Black & Hydrogen Process 28 5.4.2. Liquid Hydrogen 47 2.5.7. Plasmatron 28 5.4.3. Metal hydrid 47 2.5.8. Key figures for hydrogen 29 5.4.4. Hydrogen in carbons 48 5.4.5. Methanol 48 3. Renewable energy 30 5.4.6. Gasoline and other hydrocarbons 48 3.1. Sources of renewable energy 30 5.5. Hydrogen in airplanes 49 3.1.1. Wind power 30 5.6. Other use of hydrogen in the transport sector 50 3.1.2. Tidal energy 31 5.7. Hydrogen and safty 50 3.1.3. Osmotic pressure 31 5.8. Battery-driven electric cars 50 3.1.4. Wave power 31 5.9. Other elecric-powered vehicles 51 3.1.5. Hydropower 31 3.1.6. Solar energy 32 6. The Energy Industry: 3.2. Abundant and inexpensive supplies of From supplying raw material to providing heat available in Norway 32 technology 52 3.2.1. Bioenergy and waste 32 6.1. Hydrogen in transportation based on Norwegian 3.2.2. Solar heating systems 34 electrolysis and gas expertise 52 3.2.3. Heat pumps 34 6.2. From Norwegian silicon to international solar 3.2.4. Geothermal energy 34 power 52 3.2.5. 1-2 TWh process heat available close by 6.3. Energy from waste 53 consumers 35 6.4. Concrete with 50 % CO2 emission 53 3.3. Renewable energy in other countries 35 6.5. Light materials for cleaner transportation 54 3.3.1. Denmark 35 3.3.2. Sweden 36 7. A total energy policy 55 3.3.3. The EU 36 7.1. Developments in the energy market 55 3.4. The political and economic structure 36 7.2. Norway, the land of energy 56 3.4.1. Free energy from the process industry, 7.3. Effective use of existing energy consumption 57 geothermal sources, and wast incineration 7.3.1. Less expensive food and clothing, higher to be given the same advantages as price for electricity 57 renewable energy 36 7.3.2. Thechnological efficiency to avoid energy waste 57 Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century 5 7.3.3. Free environmental process heat must be treated the same as renewable energy 57 7.3.4. Power grid companies must opt for a district heating network when this is least expensive 58 7.4. Development of new renewable energy 58 7.4.1. Required sale of at least 5% renewable energy 58 7.4.2. Tax-exemption the first five years 58 7.5. Direct emissions reduction from energy production and use 59 7.5.1. The petroleum industry and oil heating 59 7.5.2. Transportation and energy technology, and energy carriers 59 7.5.3. Energy recycling of solid waste 60 7.5.4. Other significant stationary point sources of CO2 60 References 61 Attachment 1: Gasturbines on the Norwegian shelf 63 Attachment 2: A closer look at fossil oil, well pressure, and produced water 65 Attachment 3: Fuel Cells: From fuel to electricity and clean watert 66 Attachment 4: Index of organization names and abbreviations 67 6 Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century Bellona Report No 3:1999 Preface Green Heat and Power Autor of this report are: Thomas Palm, Cato Buch, Bjørnar Kruse and Erik Sauar Translation: Diana Smith Oeding Norway has emerged as a major pro- developed from a more integrated The Bellona Foundation ducer of oil, gas, and hydropower du- ìbig-pictureî perspective. Our target ring the lifetimes of the authors of audience is people with a general this report. Our accumulated experi- interest in the subject, individuals Norway: ence in working on environmental who work with these kinds of chal- P.O. Box 2141, Grünerløkka conservation spans approximately 50 lenges on a day-to-day basis, politici- N-0505 Oslo years, with our main area of concen- ans and other decision-makers, and Norway tration being energy and the envi- people who are actively engaged in Street address: Nordregate 2 ronment. Although river systems research and development. Email: mailto:[email protected] have been harnessed into pipes and This report represents a stark con- many oil fields have been developed, trast to the report published by the Russia: on the threshold of a new century we government-appointed energy com- Russia feel confident that the majority mission, a commission which was 183038 Murmansk would agree that our future energy unable to demonstrate how Norway P.O. Box 4310 needs cannot be based and sustained could both increase energy producti- Bellona Murmansk on the exploitation of the natural en- on and decrease energy consumpti- Email: mailto:[email protected] vironment. on, while simultaneously reducing This report sketches how Norway greenhouse-gas emissions in compli- EU (Belgium): can reposition itself to become an ance with our international commit- Bellona Europe important energy supplier that can ments. The report Green Heat and 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren help solve environmental problems Power: Eco-Eeffective Energy Soluti- B-1150 Brussels instead of create them. It is also a ons in the 21st Century documents Belgium guide to what we think is important that up until the year 2020 Norway Email: to know about energy and the chal- can free up one sixth of the electrici- [email protected] lenges facing the environment. It is ty produced, reduce CO2 emissions all too easy to become swamped by by over 50%, produce 50 TWh of re- USA: information, which is why we have newable energy, and export large Bellona USA elected to focus firmly on essentials. amounts of ìcleanî fossil fuels such P.O. Box 11835 We not only look at the solutions of as hydrogen and electricity. We have Washington, D.C. 20008 the past, we look into what the futu- only proposed measures up until USA re may bring. New thinking and ap- 2010, partly because the world will Email: mailto:[email protected] proaches to the problems that are as have changed by that time, and be- URL:http://www.bellona.no yet little known are outlined in de- cause the best means of predicting tail. We seek to present solutions the future is to be part of creating it. This report is available in English and Norwegian. Copying permitted when source is cited. Oslo, June 1999 Comments to this report are welcomed. Thomas Palm Cato Buch Bjørnar Kruse Erik Sauar Bellona wishes to thank its partners in conjunction with the B7-strategy: Aker Maritime Norway Seafoods Scanbio Aker RGI Fred Olsen & Co Scancem/Norcem Eiendomsspar Länsförsäkringar Miljö Scandic Energos Oslo Lufthavn Statkraft Forbrukersamvirket Phillips Statoil NHO SAS Uniteam Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century 7 Summary Energy and the environmental challenge.
Recommended publications
  • International Maritime Organization Maritime
    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION MARITIME KNOWLEDGE CENTRE (MKC) “Sharing Maritime Knowledge” CURRENT AWARENESS BULLETIN DECEMBER 2019 www.imo.org Maritime Knowledge Centre (MKC) [email protected] www d Maritime Knowledge Centre (MKC) About the MKC Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) The aim of the MKC Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) is to provide a digest of news and publications focusing on key subjects and themes related to the work of IMO. Each CAB issue presents headlines from the previous month. For copyright reasons, the Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) contains brief excerpts only. Links to the complete articles or abstracts on publishers' sites are included, although access may require payment or subscription. The MKC Current Awareness Bulletin is disseminated monthly and issues from the current and the past years are free to download from this page. Email us if you would like to receive email notification when the most recent Current Awareness Bulletin is available to be downloaded. The Current Awareness Bulletin (CAB) is published by the Maritime Knowledge Centre and is not an official IMO publication. Inclusion does not imply any endorsement by IMO. Table of Contents IMO NEWS & EVENTS ............................................................................................................................ 2 UNITED NATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 4 CASUALTIES...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Energy Technologies
    Nordic Energy Technologies nBge A lIn A sustAInABle noRdIC eneRgy futuRe Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 energy Research and Innovation systems in The nordic Region 4 2.1 Describing Nordic Energy Innovation Systems 4 2.1.1 The Nordic Energy Mix 4 2.1.2 Energy Research and Innovation Systems in The Nordic Region 6 2.2 Assessing Nordic Energy Research and Innovation Systems 13 2.2.1 Framework Conditions 13 2.2.2 Energy Research and Innovation Performance 16 Publications, citations and patents 17 Technology deployment and diffusion 19 3 transnational Cooperation 23 3.1 Nordic Cooperation 23 3.2 Cooperation with Adjacent Areas 24 3.2.1 Cooperation with the Baltic Countries 24 3.2.2 European Research Area (ERA) 24 3.3 Emerging Economies 26 3.3.1 Russia 26 3.3.2 China 28 4 Concluding Remarks 30 5 Bibliography 32 Appendix 1: The noria-energy Project Portfolio 34 2 Nordic Energy Technologies ENABLING A SUSTAINABLE NORDIC ENERGY FUTURE Amund Vik and Benjamin Donald Smith, Nordic Energy Research LISTf o abbreViations CCS Carbon Capture and Storage CHP Combined Heat and Power COP15 UN Climate Summit in Copenhagen 2009 DTU Technical University of Denmark EPO European Patent Office ERA European Research Area ERA-NET European Research Area Network EU European Union EUDP Danish Energy Development and Demonstration Programme GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Green House Gasses IEA International Energy Agency IPCC UN International Panel on Climate Change IPR Intellectual Property Rights KTH Royal Institute of Technology NCM Nordic Council of Ministers NER Nordic
    [Show full text]
  • Nornickel and the Kola Peninsula
    THE BELLONA FOUNDATION Nornickel and the Kola Peninsula Photo: Thomas Nilsen ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY IN THE YEAR OF ECOLOGY JANUARY 2018 The Bellona Foundation is an international environmental NGO based in Norway. Founded in 1986 as a direct action protest group, Bellona has become a recognized technology and solution- oriented organizations with offices in Oslo, Brussels, Kiev, St. Petersburg and Murmansk. Altogether, some 60 engineers, ecologists, nuclear physicists, economists, lawyers, political scientists and journalists work at Bellona. Environmental change is an enormous challenge. It can only be solved if politicians and legislators develop clear policy frameworks and regulations for industry and consumers. Industry plays a role by developing and commercializing environmentally sound technology. Bellona strives to be a bridge builder between industry and policy makers, working closely with the former to help them respond to environmental challenges in their field, and proposing policy measures that promote new technologies with the least impact on the environment. Authors: Oskar Njaa © Bellona 201 8 Design: Bellona Disclaimer: Bellona endeavors to ensure that the information disclosed in this report is correct and free from copyrights, but does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, interpretation or usefulness of the information which may result from the use of this report. Contact: [email protected] Web page: www.bellona.org 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction: ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Annual report 2013 1 RESULTS AND ACTIVITIES 2013 Content Key figures 2013 3 Part 5 | Reporting – the Energy Fund 35 The CEO speaks 4 2012 and 2013 Enova’s main objective 36 Part 1 | Enova’s outlook 5 Objectives and results of the Energy Fund 38 Green competitiveness 6 Management of the Energy Fund’s resources 40 New energy and climate technology 41 Part 2 | Enova’s activities 9 Climate reporting 52 Social responsibility 10 In-depth reporting 54 Organization 10 Energy results 54 Management 12 Funding level 55 Energy results by project category 56 Portfolio composition 58 Part 3 | Market descriptions 13 Activities 62 Enova – market team player 14 International 65 Indicators 14 Geographical distribution and the largest Renewable heating: 67 16 projects From new establishment to growth Tasks outside the Energy Fund 70 Industry and non-industrial plants and facilities: 18 More companies are cooperating with Enova Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) 70 Non-residential buildings: Intelligent Energy Europe (IEE) 70 20 Energy smart buildings for the future Natural gas 70 Residential buildings: 22 From advice to action Part 6 | Reporting – the Energy Fund New energy and climate technology: 71 24 An innovation perspective 2001-2011 Bioenergy: Energy results and allocations 2001-2011 72 26 Small steps towards a stronger market Climate reporting 78 Part 4 | New energy and climate Appendices 80 27 technology Consultation submissions 81 New technology for the future’s non-residential 28 Publications 81 buildings Definitions and explanation of terminology 82 Symbol key Investigated Renewable Industry Interaction Advicing New energy and Financing Non-residential climate technology buildings Graphs/tables Renewable heating Projects Resedential buildings 2 Key figures 2013 30% RENEWABLE HEATING 5% 1% RESIDENTIAL RENEWABLE BUILDINGS P O W E R PRODUCTION 1,4 TWh In 2013, Enova supported projects with a total energy result of 1.4 TWh through the Energy Fund, distributed over energy efficiency measures, conversion and increased utilization of renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Environmental Impact of Vertical Farming, Greenhouses and Food Import a Case Study for the Norwegian Vegetable Market
    University College Ghent 2017 - 2018 Campus Mercator Henleykaai 84 9000 Ghent Hogeschool Gent Campus Mercator Oslo, 04.06.2018 Henleykaai 84 9000 Gent A comparison of the environmental impact of vertical farming, greenhouses and food import A case study for the Norwegian vegetable market Student: Klaus De Geyter Education: Business management Specialisation: Environmental Management Company: BySpire Thesis supervisor: Katrijn Cierkens © 2018, Klaus De Geyter. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in an automated database, or made public, in any form or by any means, be it electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or in any other way, without the prior written permission of the author. The use or reproduction of certain information from this work is only allowed for personal use and provided the source is acknowledged. Any use for commercial or advertising purposes is prohibited. This bachelor's thesis was made by Klaus De Geyter, a student at University College Ghent, to complete a Bachelor's degree in business management. The positions expressed in this bachelor's thesis are purely the personal point of view of the individual author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion, the official position or the policy of the University College Ghent. © 2018, Klaus De Geyter. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen of enige andere manier, zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de auteur. Het gebruik of de reproductie van bepaalde informatie uit dit werk is enkel toegestaan voor persoonlijk gebruik en mits bronvermelding.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Environmentalism Between State and Local Community: Why Greenpeace Failed in Norway
    NORWEGIAN ENVIRONMENTALISM BETWEEN STATE AND LOCAL COMMUNITY: WHY GREENPEACE FAILED IN NORWAY Kristin Strømsnes, Per Selle and Gunnar Grendstad Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies / Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen Paper presented at the 7th International ISTR Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, July 9-12 2006. NORWEGIAN ENVIRONMENTALISM BETWEEN STATE AND LOCAL COMMUNITY: WHY GREENPEACE FAILED IN NORWAY Kristin Strømsnes, Per Selle and Gunnar Grendstad Why is it that Greenpeace never succeeded in Norway? To answer this question, we have to examine the way organized environmentalism is configured in the Norwegian case. This is a case that does not easily fit into the general assumptions behind the definitions of environmentalism that has been generated by the bulk of ‘continental’ or ‘Anglo-Saxon’ literature (see Grendstad et al. 2006). We argue that the Norwegian case deviates from the mainstream definition of environmentalism due to two anomalies. The roots of the two anomalies are found at different but interrelated levels of analysis. The first anomaly is that the Norwegian political and social system differs when compared to systems in most other countries in that adversary actors or interests are not excluded from national politics, but, in general, are welcomed by the government. We label this anomaly the inclusive polity and the state-friendly society. In short, we refer to it as the state-friendly society. This anomaly, which has a long historical tradition, is primarily found at a structural level. But it also ties in with mainstream attitudes and beliefs that define part of the Norwegian political culture. The other anomaly is more ideological, although this, too, has strong structural ties because national environmental concern is influenced by a notion of social hardship and self-sufficiency as part of local living.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Growth, Better Climate: the New Climate Economy Report
    BETTER GROWTH BETTER CLIMATE The New Climate Economy Report THE GLOBAL REPORT THE GLOBAL COMMISSION ON THE ECONOMY AND CLIMATE PARTNERS Managing Partner September 2014 New Climate Economy c/o World Resources Institute www.newclimateeconomy.report www.newclimateeconomy.net 10 G St NE Suite 800 Washington, DC 20002, USA +1 (202) 729-7600 ISBN: 978-0-9906845-1-0 Photo credit: Asian Development Bank BETTER GROWTH BETTER CLIMATE The New Climate Economy Report THE GLOBAL REPORT The New Climate Economy The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, and its flagship project The New Climate Economy, were set up to help governments, businesses and society make better-informed decisions on how to achieve economic prosperity and development while also addressing climate change. This programme of work was commissioned in 2013 by the governments of seven countries: Colombia, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Norway, South Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The Commission has operated as an independent body and, while benefiting from the support of the seven governments, has been given full freedom to reach its own conclusions. The Commission’s programme of work has been conducted by a global partnership of eight leading research institutes: World Resources Institute (WRI, Managing Partner), Climate Policy Initiative (CPI), Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI), Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI), Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), LSE Cities, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) and Tsinghua University. 2 www.newclimateeconomy.report The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate has overseen the New Climate Economy project. Chaired by former President of Mexico Felipe Calderón, the Commission comprises former heads of government and finance ministers, and leaders in the fields of economics, business and finance.
    [Show full text]
  • IRON and STEEL Takes Part in the Chemical Reaction to Produce Steel
    AN Iyourndustry’s Guide phoneto pillsClimate Actioncar houseindirectly emit CO2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Grateful thanks to the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation for supporting our work on indutrial climate action. DISCLAIMER Bellona endeavours to ensure that the information disclosed in this report is correct and free from copyrights but does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, interpretation or usefulness of the information which may result from the use of this report. © 2018 by the Bellona Foundation. All rights reserved. This copy is for personal, non-commercial useonly. Users may download, print or copy extracts of content from this publication for their own and non-commercial use. No part of this work may be reproduced without quoting the Bellona Foundation or the source used in this report. Commercial use of this publication requires prior consent of the Bellona Foundation. ABOUT BELLONA Bellona Europa is the Brussels-based branch of the Norwegian Bellona Foundation, an independent non-profit organisation working on the environmental, climate and social issues of our time. We aim to identify, promote and help implement realisable solutions for the protection of nature, the environment and health. To achieve these goals, Bellona continues to work with – and against – relevant actors and stakeholders both nationally, and internationally. OUR ORGANISATION Bellona was founded in 1986 in Oslo, Norway, as an environmental action group. Still headquartered in Oslo, we have since expanded with offices in Brussels, Murmansk and St. Petersburg. Our team consists of about 65 employees with diverse professional backgrounds in communication, engineering, ecology, economics, geosciences, law, physics, and political and social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • NVE Energibruksrapport 2011
    Energy consumption Energy consumption in mainland Norway 4 2012 RAPPORT Ressursfordeling 1:300 Utbygd Gitt tillatelse/under bygging Står att, utbyggbart Verna Verneplan 1 : 2 000 000 0 80 160 km Energy consumption Energy consumption in mainland Norway Report no. 9/2011 Energy consumption, energy consumption in mainland Norway Published by: Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Edited by: Energy consumption division Author: Ingrid H. Magnussen, Dag Spilde and Magnus Killingland Printed: in-house Circulation: Cover photo: Graphic by Rune Stubrud, NVE ISBN: 978-82-410-0782-8 Keywords: Energy consumption, energy consumption in mainland Norway Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Middelthunsgate 29 P.O. Box 5091 Majorstua 0301 OSLO Phone: 22 95 95 95 Fax: 22 95 90 00 Website: www.nve.no May 2011 2 Glossary Term Explanation Norwegian Water Resources and Energy NVE Directorate Consumption of all types of energy products Energy consumption (electricity, district heating, oil, gas etc.) Electricity Electrical power, electrical energy Energy consumed in buildings, industry and Final energy consumption transport in mainland Norway. Excludes energy consumed in the energy sector. Gross energy consumption in mainland Total of final energy consumption and energy Norway consumption in the energy sector. Producers, distributors, retailers etc. of energy, Energy sector oil, gas, district heating, electrical power etc. Producers, distributors, retailers etc. of oil, gas Petroleum sector and refined petroleum products. Energy used in buildings, industrial processes Stationary energy consumption and in the energy sector. Energy for motorised vehicles and means of Energy consumption in transport transport. All types of passenger and goods transport, Transport both private and commercial.
    [Show full text]
  • Erneuerbare Energien Und Energieeffizienz Renewable Energies and Energy Efficiency Band 14 / Vol
    Erneuerbare Energien und Energieeffizienz Renewable Energies and Energy Efficiency Band 14 / Vol. 14 Herausgegeben von / Edited by Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Schmid, Universität Kassel Michael Sterner Bioenergy and renewable power methane in integrated 100% renewable energy systems Limiting global warming by transforming energy systems kassel university press This work has been accepted by the faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science of the University of Kassel as a thesis for acquiring the academic degree of Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Dr.-Ing.). Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Schmid, Universität Kassel Co-Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Faulstich, Technische Universität München Defense day 23rd September 2009 Bibliographic information published by Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Zugl.: Kassel, Univ., Diss. 2009 ISBN print: 978-3-89958-798-2 ISBN online: 978-3-89958-799-9 URN: urn:nbn:de:0002-7998 © 2009, kassel university press GmbH, Kassel www.upress.uni-kassel.de Cover design: Grafik Design Jörg Batschi, Kassel Printed in Germany Abstract The two major challenges in global energy systems are to reduce energy-related greenhouse gas emissions and to maintain energy supply security. This thesis presents one solution to both problems. It proposes strategies for the transformation of current energy systems into 100% renewable, stable and almost emission-free energy systems without making use of nuclear energy or carbon capture and storage. Within renewable energy systems, one is facing two difficulties: On the one hand, the fluctuating renewable sources need to be matched with the energy demand, on the other hand, a substitution for high energy density fuels in heat and transport has to be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Heat and Power. Eco-Effective Energy Solutions in the 21St Century
    . .c^o5 os12. ^ eNVo^c- < - - - 3C HA Bellona Report No 3:1999 jf-fi Mg gM Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century T Palm C Buch B Knuc f Sd'iai Bellona Report No 3:1999 Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century T. Palm, C. Buch, B. Kruse, E. Sauar June 1999 English version June 2000 Thanks to Runar Forseth and Simen Graff [enssen for good discussions ISBN 82-993138-8-0 ISSN 0806-3451 Published by the Bellona Foundation 4 Green Heat and Power Eco-effective Energy Solutions in the 21st Century Preface 6 3.5. Hydrogen production from renewable energy 37 Summary 7 3.5.1. Electrolysis of water 37 3.5.2. Gasification of biomass 37 1. The Energy and Environment Challenge 9 3.5.3. Photoelectrochemical production 37 1.1. Three sources of fossil fuel 9 3.5.4. Photobiological hydrogen production 37 1.1.1. Three key factors 9 3.5.5. Biological hydrogen production from 1.2. Three principle sources of energy in Norway 10 organic wast 38 1.3. Three uses of energy 10 3.5.6. Thermal electrolysis of water 38 1.4. Three key solutions 10 1.4.1. Cleaner fossil fuels 11 1.4.2. Renewable energy 11 4. Energy efficiency on the mainland 39 1.4.3. Energy efficiency 12 4.1. New technology to curb increasing 1.5. Three sources of emissions to the environment 12 consumption of electricity 39 1.5.1. Three major kinds of emissions and their 4.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Preliminary Draft Do Not Cite Transparency and The
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT DO NOT CITE TRANSPARENCY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Misha Singh and Shekhar Singh1 Introduction It has been a little over fifty years since environmental degradation was acknowledged to have joined the ranks of hunger, poverty, disease, war and injustice as one of the main threats confronting humanity. Since then, the news has been mostly bad and not only has the threat become more severe but new dimensions, like global warming, depletion of the ozone layer, space litter, electronic waste, and genetically modified organisms, have become evident. Environmental degradation has also come to be recognised, along with injustice, as an underlying cause behind much of the hunger, poverty and disease, and some of the wars, that afflict the world. This paper attempts to describe the growth of environmental consciousness and its relation with transparency. It describes the current state of legal instrumentalities and traces the evolution of access to environmental information movements and laws and their relationship with more general transparency laws and struggles. It finally lists out some of the environmental areas and issues where access to information is especially critical. The Growth of Global Environmental Consciousness The last hundred and fifty years saw unprecedented growth in human population, rapid changes in human lifestyles and consumption patterns, and growth of technologies that facilitated unlimited exploitation of natural resources. As more and more people needed and wanted more and more goods and resources, and acquired the capacity to extract these from nature, the natural environment began to degrade. Unfortunately, the process of extraction of natural resources and their conversion into goods for human use also produced by-products that polluted the environment.
    [Show full text]