DOCSLIB.ORG

At a Meeting of the Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel Held on Monday, 16 February 2015 at 7:00 Pm at the Committee Room 1, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
At a Meeting of the Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel Held on Monday, 16 February 2015 at 7:00 Pm at the Committee Room 1, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow At a meeting of the Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel held on Monday, 16 February 2015 at 7:00 pm at the Committee Room 1, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow. Present: Councillor Linda Green (Chair) Councillor Tony Louki (Vice-Chair) Councillors Candice Atterton, Harleen Atwal Hear, Samia Chaudhary, Mel Collins, Tony Louki, Paul Lynch and Alan Mitchell Zara Qureshi and Robert Was Apologies for Absence Councillor Peter Carey. Kamal Ahmad and Jacqui Corley 150. Apologies for absence, declarations of interest or any other communications from Members Apologies had been received from Jacqui Corley, Co-opted Member and Kamal Ahmad, Co- opted Member. Councillor Atterton had sent apologies for lateness. Alan Adams and Jacqui McShannon had an alternative meeting and gave apologies. Jacqui McShannon did join the meeting for a short time subsequently. Ian Duke gave apologies as he was unwell. The Chair invited any declarations of interest or other communications from members. For Item 5: ‘Arts Provision for Young People’, Councillor Mitchell declared that he wished to talk about the Dramatic Edge project in the London Borough of Richmond and should declare that he had contact with the project in the past and had hosted their events. 151. Minutes of the meeting held on 3 December 2014 The Chair noted that the minutes had been issued late and checked that all members had had the opportunity to read the minutes. It was noted as something to be corrected for the future that the names of the former youth co-opted members had been shown on the agenda front sheet. The minutes were agreed, subject to the following amendment – Councillor Lynch believed that he had sent apologies and it was agreed these should be noted in the record. Councillor Mitchell moved approval of the minutes, subject to the amendment above. This motion was seconded by Councillor Louki. Resolved: That the minutes were agreed as a true record and signed by the Chair. 152. Matters Arising There were no matters arising from the minutes. 153. School Transport Assistance See the report by Councillor Linda Green, Chair of the Children and Young People Scrutiny Panel and the tabled responses to questions submitted by Scrutiny in advance of the meeting – Agenda Item 4. The Chair introduced Merle Abbott, Head of Special Educational Needs (SEN) and Disability, who was attending the meeting for this item to give an update on school travel assistance and changes to the policy. The issue had come to the Panel’s attention when raised by a parent. The Panel would not look at individual cases but considered that this was an opportunity to address the wider issue of school travel assistance in the climate of cuts and overspend. The Chair invited Merle Abbott to update the Panel. Merle Abbott advised that she had discussed with Ben Knight, the Scrutiny Officer that a suitable approach would be to go through some of the key issues and allow the maximum opportunity for members’ questions. Some data had been requested in advance of this meeting to provide context. The numbers might assist members. This information had been circulated to members at the meeting. Ms Abbott explained that she was speaking of the latest iteration of a policy which had been introduced in 2010/11. Prior to that date if a child had a Statement of Special Educational Needs and needed to go to specialist provision, transport was automatically provided. However, as the numbers increased, this became unsustainable. So in 2010/11 a new policy was introduced involving an assessment each year of the child’s needs. If the child required local authority provision, arrangements would be made. Ms Abbott explained how a child in law was deemed ‘eligible’ for free transport but in London all children of statutory school age could travel by bus free of charge. So a child might be ‘eligible’ but the authority then considered whether the child needed provision beyond the normal public transport. (Zara Qureshi and Mr Was joined the meeting at this point – 7.08 p.m.) The assessment of need looked at the needs of the child, the complexity of the journey and special circumstances. In making the assessment, the department took into account the form completed by the parent and other information available to the local authority, such as information on the child’s disability and information from the school. Ms Abbott explained that statutory guidance advised of issues to be taken into account when making a judgement on travel assistance. In the past the then statutory guidance had been described as a ‘little woolly’ by the judge in a judicial review case. However, the statutory guidance was turned into criteria concerning the eligibility for free transport and the entitlement of the Council to make other arrangements. At this point, the authority introduced something new to the arrangements, namely the use of pick up points. (Councillor Atterton joined the meeting at this point – 7.10 p.m.). Merle Abbott clarified that as numbers increased it became necessary to consider the way the service was delivered to meet the need and its cost effectiveness. Where an assessment showed that a child needed travel arrangements, it was not necessarily the case that the child needed to be picked up from home. In the case of children with physical and medical needs such as children in wheelchairs, the service did continue to collect children from home. However, children with other needs were able to walk a short distance to access transport at a pick up point. In the autumn of 2012, two parents took a judicial review of the decision to introduce pick up points. The judgement of the case was given in March 2013. The parents argued that ‘home to school’ transport meant transport from the child’s home. The authority provided evidence to the court on the rationale behind the decision to use pick up points and the safeguards in place. The judgement ruled that the phrase ‘home to school’ did not require provision from the child’s home to the school in every case. It also allowed the use of pick up points to be imposed rather than consented to by the child’s parents. Ms Abbott raised this matter with the Panel because she understood the parent who had raised school travel assistance with Scrutiny was concerned about the variation in pick up point. She confirmed that pick up points designated were a maximum of half a mile from the child’s home and assessed to be a safe place to wait and be collected. The Chair asked in the particular case what had changed for the child when the change to a pick up point was made. It was explained that the child’s needs had been assessed previously as suitable for use of a pick up point but the previous year there had not been a pick up point assessed to be used. Ms Abbott explained that each year the team refined the practice on the basis of experience and lessons learnt. So for the future in letters to the parents when the authority said that the child has been assessed for a pick up point, they would also say that it was likely that the pick up point would not be the child’s home. This would allow the parents the opportunity to challenge the decision at an early stage. Merle Abbott advised the Panel that the Department for Education had issued new statutory guidance in July 2014. This guidance in some cases led to changes in the decision on circumstances. Every parent in receipt of school travel assistance had been written to in order to advise of the change with the new guidance included as an attachment to the letter. The key change was the section on accompaniment by parents. (Jacqui McShannon joined the meeting at this point – 7.15 p.m.). Ms Abbott explained that the new guidance made it clear that parents were expected to accompany their children to school unless there was good reason why that was not possible. She referred members to paragraph 17 of the new guidance (included in the Scrutiny Panel agenda pack at page 20). Ms Abbott read out to the Panel what the local authority needed to consider in respect of whether the child’s parent could reasonably be expected to accompany the child to school especially where ordinarily it would be expected that a child of that age would be accompanied. The legislation did not just apply to a child with special educational needs so the department would consider what would be reasonable for the parent of a child without a disability, unless the child’s needs precluded them from walking a normal distance. Merle Abbott explained to the Panel that in the borough the census returns showed that there were 15,845 children from Nursery age to Year 3 (so generally aged 8). Up to and including age 8, it was expected that a child could walk up to 2 miles to school. So this was the context for decisions. The key factor was the child’s needs. Where a child was not physically able to walk, arrangements would be made to get them to school without cost, but there were many thousands of children in the borough where it was expected that their parents would get them to school. Included in the new policy was the expectation that the parents would take reasonable action to discharge their duties to accompany a child to school. Councillor Candice Atterton pointed out that one big issue for parents was the need to get another child to an alternative school.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regeneration and ED Strategy 2016
    Draft for adoption Ss1234 1 London Borough of Hounslow London Borough of Hounslow Regeneration and Economic Development Strategy 2016 - 20 Contents 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Context ......................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Vision and Strategies ................................................................................................................. 9 5. Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 12 6. Objective 1 – Growing Business ........................................................................................... 17 7. Objective 2 – Improving Connectivity ............................................................................... 35 8. Objective 3 – Place-making ................................................................................................. 40 A. Town centres ........................................................................................................................ 40 B. Context and character of the borough’s places ..................................................... 52 C. Sustainable mixed communities ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • If You Require Further Information About This Agenda Please Contact: Anthony Lumley on 020 8583 2248 Or [email protected]
    If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Anthony Lumley on 020 8583 2248 or [email protected] LOCAL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP A meeting of the Local Strategic Partnership will be held at the Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow on Thursday, 14 September 2006 at 6:00 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillor Mark Bowen – London Borough of Hounslow Satvinder Buttar – Hounslow Racial Equality Council CS Ali Dizaei– Metropolitan Police John Foster – Hounslow Primary Care Trust Gerard Hollingworth – London Fire Brigade Mark Gilks – London Borough of Hounslow Rory Gillert – Hounslow Voluntary Sector Forum Russell Harris – West London Business Christine Hay – Hounslow Primary Care Trust Robert Innes – London West Learning & Skills Council Councillor Peter Thompson – London Borough of Hounslow AGENDA 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes (Pages 1 - 5) To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 8 March 2006 3. Local Area Agreement Performance Report for Quarter 1 (Pages 6 - 12) Report by Councillor Peter Thompson 4. Community Plan (Pages 13 - 83) (a) Performance Update March 2006 (b) Consultation Plan (c) Framework and Content – Discussion Paper (d) Consultation Questionnaire 5. LSP Awayday Update (Pages 84 - 90) 6. LSP Stakeholder Conference Feedback (Pages 91 - 94) 7. Brentford Plan (Pages 95 - 197) 8. Any Urgent Business 9. Date of Next Meeting Meetings of the LSP are currently scheduled to be held at the Civic Centre at 6.00pm on the following dates: • Wednesday 14 December 2006 • Thursday 15 March 2007 • Thursday 14 June 2007 but please bring your diary to the meeting as it may be necessary to arrange some additional dates.
    [Show full text]
  • West London Pub Guide
    West London Pub Guide A comprehensive guide to over 1300 pubs in the London WC, W and Middlesex areas Copyright CAMRA 2005 0 1 CONTENTS FOREWORD Foreword ............................................................................................................... 3 What you seek when you travel… Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 …don’t you want it at home, too? How to use this guide ........................................................................................... 5 By Michael Jackson What is real ale? ................................................................................................... 8 My job is to travel the world in search of good beer. I can strongly recommend What is CAMRA? .................................................................................................. 8 the smoked beer at Ceveceria Artesanal, a brewpub in El Bolsón, Patagonia, for example. Or the spicy-tasting Okhotsk Ale from one in Kitami, Hokkaido, Japan. West London’s pub heritage ............................................................................... 10 It is, as the song says, so nice to go travelling, but oh, so nice to come home. My first stop when I do return is my local, The Andover Arms, in Hammer- Pubs ain’t what they used to be .......................................................................... 11 smith, London. I may have flown into London sleepless from some distant bar, but I can’t wait to get my tasting gear round
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Thomas Ribbits Tel: 020 8583 2251 E-Mail: [email protected]
    Contact: Thomas Ribbits Tel: 020 8583 2251 E-Mail: [email protected] COUNCIL – 24th MAY 2011 APPOINTMENTS TO OUTSIDE BODIES 2011/12 Report by: The Head of Democratic Services Summary This report seeks appointments to outside bodies on which the Council has been invited to provide representatives for the municipal year 2011/12. 1.0 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the appointments to outside bodies for the municipal year 2011/12 (unless otherwise stated) as listed in this report (or tabled at the meeting) be approved. 2.0 Background 2.1 The Council is asked to make appointments to the bodies indicated in the appendix (or in any tabled paper). Most appointments are on an annual basis but there are some for longer periods and, where this is the case, the duration of the appointment is listed. 2.2 At the time of publication of this report, nominations have not yet been made and so this information will be tabled at the meeting itself. 2.3 Some of these appointments require decisions to be made as soon as possible whereas in other cases, the need is not so pressing. If there are any non-contentious outstanding appointments following the meeting, they will be submitted for approval using the council’s urgency arrangements in order to ensure that such appointments can be implemented as quickly as possible. Background Papers: Correspondence from outside bodies This report has been or is due to be considered by: Borough Council This report is relevant to the following wards/areas: All APPENDIX A OUTSIDE BODIES AND NOMINATIONS NAME OF OUTSIDE
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Details of Recommendations 2. Report Summary Contains
    Report for: ACTION Contains Confidential No or Exempt Information Title CEX 419 Borough of Culture and Commissioning Culture Member Reporting Cllr Samia Chaudhary, Lead Member for Leisure Services Contact Details Victoria Lawson, Executive Director, Environment, Culture and Customer Services, [email protected], 020 8583 4463 For Consideration By Cabinet Date to be Considered 15th October 2019 Implementation Date if 28th October 2019 (and April 2020 for broader Not Called In commissioning of culture) Affected Wards All Keywords/Index Culture; Borough of Culture; Commissioning 1. Details of Recommendations Cabinet is asked to: 1. Endorse the London Borough of Hounslow’s bid to be London Borough of Culture 2021 and commit to match funding of up to £337,500 plus £67,500 in in-kind support in the event of our bid being successful. 2. Endorse a new approach to funding culture across the borough by approving the creation of a £175,000 We Are Hounslow cultural commissioning budget for 2020/21, the final design of which will be delegated to the Executive Director of Environment, Culture and Customer Services. 2. Report Summary The London Borough of Hounslow is bidding for Borough of Culture status in 2021. A successful Borough of Culture bid would bring c. £1.35m into the borough to support a year-long cultural programme and would need to be supported by match funding from the council and other partners. The benefits to the borough in terms of reputation, tourism, and cultural impact are significant and Cabinet are asked to approve the bid for Borough of Culture 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Hounslow Local Plan
    Hounslow Local Plan Version for Adoption September 2015 1 London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan This is a version of the Local Plan to be considered for adoption at the council meeting on 15 September 2015. The figures, tables and site allocation maps referred to in this document will be included in the final copy of the Local Plan to be published following adoption. 2 Foreword (Foreword by Councillor Steve Curran, Lead Member for Housing, Planning and Regeneration, to be inserted following adoption of the Local Plan). Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. Spatial strategy 7 3. Town centres 30 4. Economic development 44 5. Sustainable mixed communities 52 6. Context and character 74 7. Green and blue infrastructure 88 8. Community infrastructure 106 9. Environmental quality 115 10. Enhancing connectivity 133 11. Implementing the strategy 141 12. Site allocations 145 13. Appendices 186 3 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION Purpose 1.1 The Local Plan is a local development plan document that sets out the council’s proposals for the future development of the borough over 15 years through a suite of new planning policies. All local authorities are required to prepare a Local Plan with the objective of contributing to the achievement of sustainable development, addressing the spatial implications of economic, social and environmental change. Process 1.2 The borough’s new Local Plan replaces all of the policies and proposals in the Brentford Area Action Plan (2009), the Employment Development Plan Document (2008) and the saved policies in the Unitary Development Plan (2007) together with supporting Supplementary Planning Documents and/or Guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Submission Draft Version of the London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan
    Internal draft Version 5 31st January 2014 Proposed submission draft version of the London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan 2015 – 2030 Includes notes to indicate where minor additions or revisions have yet to be made. Subject to editorial and presentational improvements. 1 BLANK PAGE 2 Contents 1. Introduction p.07 Purpose of the Local Plan Pubic Consultation Policy and context - Soundness 2. Spatial vision and strategy Spatial vision for the borough of Hounslow in 2030 p.13 Supporting statement to the vision Spatial objectives Spatial strategy for the borough with key diagram p.23 Spatial strategy for ten local districts p.27 Spatial strategy for Chiswick – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Brentford – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Osterley and Spring Grove – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Isleworth – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Hounslow – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Hounslow West – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Cranford and Heston – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Feltham – diagram and key points Spatial strategy for Hanworth – diagram and key points 3. Planning Policies p.49 Supporting our town centres Policy TC 1 Town and local centre network Policy TC 2 Ensuring the future and vitality of town centres Policy TC 3 Managing uses in town centres Promoting economic development Policy ED 1 Promoting office growth and development Policy ED 2 Maintaining the Borough’s Industrial Land Supply Policy ED 3 Great West - Outer London Development
    [Show full text]
  • Heathrow Airport Expansion Consultation, P4
    Winter 2017 HounslowCommunity news from around the borough All you need to know about the services that matter to you MATTERS Heathrow Airport expansion consultation, p4 Hounslow’s new housing schemes p10-11 Improving Dukes Meadows p12-13 New garden waste collection service 2017 p14 Balancing the budget p20 Bedfont | Hanworth | Feltham | Cranford | Hounslow | Heston | Osterley | Isleworth | Brentford | Chiswick xxx 2 Welcome to the Winter edition of Hounslow Matters – February 2017 What’s inside News 4-9 Hounslow’s new housing schemes 10-11 Delivering new, improved Delivering on our Pledge Improving Dukes services and continuing to Meadows 12-13 put our residents first Hounslow Council gets tough with enforcement! 13 Despite the continuing challenges building in the heart of Hounslow The new garden waste we face through reduced funding town centre. You can read about collection service 14 from central government, we’re this on page 22. looking at 2017 as a major year Update on Space Waye 15 for delivery here at Hounslow. We Budget proposals are being made a start in November with the discussed at Borough Council on Why recycle your launch of the new recycling and 21 February – we’re in challenging food waste 16-17 waste collections service, which times and having to make further Are you a Parent Carer we moved from external contract tough decisions, but we remain of a child or young person to Recycle360, part of our wholly determined to minimise the impact with disabilities? 19 council owned company Lampton on local services and residents as 360. On page 6, you can read about much as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ealing Fields Residents' Association's (Efra
    EALING FIELDS RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION’S (EFRA) SUBMISSION TO LONDON ASSEMBLY TRANSPORT COMMITTEE’S INVESTIGATION INTO BUS SERVICES IN LONDON CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. North West London Hospital Reorganisation 3. Bus Access to West Middlesex Hospital 4. Ealing Fields Residents’ Association Appendices TfL Bus Spider Maps Buses from West Middlesex University Hospital Buses from Brentford High Street Buses from Ealing Broadway Buses from Southall Broadway and High Street Buses from Northwick Park Buses from Ealing Hospital NHS North West London Reorganisation Press Release August 2013 EFRA SUBMISSION TO THE LONDON ASSEMBLY TRANSPORT COMMITTEE’S INVESTIGATION INTO BUS SERVICES IN LONDON 1 INTRODUCTION This submission relates to the Committee’s second term of reference in respect of the announced hospital reorganisation in North West London. “How does TfL plan, review, redesign and implement changes to the bus services to meet changing demand? Are there any issues with TfL’s approach?” As a residents’ association serving some 2,000 households in the Northfields/South Ealing area we are particularly concerned about the increased difficulties which will be experienced by our members and their neighbours in accessing relocated hospital provision if the existing bus networks are not revised. 2 NORTH WEST LONDON HOSPITAL REORGANISATION At present Ealing Hospital provides a 24/7 accident and emergency service for our residents. It is also the location for specialist out-patient clinics and the conducting of tests requested by our GP’s. As shown on the attached TfL spider map, Ealing Hospital is exceptionally well served by the bus network with stops in the Uxbridge Road and also includes an on-site bus station where some routes terminate.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Borough -Hounslow 2020 OPEN PROJECT SYSTEM
    12/4/2017 GLA OPS MAYOR OF LONDON | Logout () OPEN PROJECT SYSTEM We use cookies to ensure we give you the best experience on our website. Find out more about cookies in our privacy policy (https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/privacy-policy) Our Borough -Hounslow BACK 2020 Status: Assess Change Management Report Project ID: P10919 London Borough of London Borough of Culture Culture 12 unapproved blocks Collapse all blocks () Project Details Jump to General Information () New block with edits There is no approved version of this block Unapproved changes on 22/11/2017 by Project title Our Borough -Hounslow 2020 Bidding arrangement London Borough of Hounslow Organisation name London Borough of Hounslow Programme selected London Borough of Culture Project type selected London Borough of Culture https://ops.london.gov.uk/#/change-report/10919 1/32 12/4/2017 GLA OPS If you are related to any elected GLA members or GLA staff, please tell us about your relationship with them, their name (or names) and which team they work in N/A Project Overview Jump to Making an impact () New block with edits There is no approved version of this block Unapproved changes on 01/12/2017 by Which year are you applying to become the London Borough of Culture? 2020 If you have a preference for a particular year, please tell us why 2020 allows a 3yr programme of preparation including further consultation with our public, stakeholders and partners through an extensive social media campaign and workshops to ensure complete ownership of the programme along with a substantive legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANNING COMMITTEE 12 May 2016 [email protected]
    PLANNING COMMITTEE 12 May 2016 [email protected] References: P/2015/4055 00607/AM/P5 Site: Watermans Park, High Street, Brentford, London TW8 0DS Description: Creation of 26 permanent moorings with a new 14 space car park and associated landscaping This application is being taken to Planning Committee as it is a major application on Council owned land. 1.0 SUMMARY 1.1 The application proposes the creation of 26 permanent residential moorings with an associated structure for car parking, servicing and storage at Watermans Park, as well as new landscaping throughout the park itself. 1.2 The existing boats which are moored without consent or proper services would be replaced with new good quality residential mooring spaces that would include appropriate access and services including power, water and sewerage. Environmental impacts, including to the river are satisfactory, and the scheme would also remove unsightly wrecks and rubbish from the site, whilst new landscaping to the park would enhance its appearance and opportunities for its use. 1.3 Detailed conditions covering demolition work and construction, including within the river would minimise environmental effects, whilst other conditions controlling the management of the moorings would ensure ongoing operational impacts are satisfactory and not disruptive to the use of the river or adjacent park. 1.4 The application is recommended for approval subject to conditions. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 The application site is comprised of Watermans Park and a stretch of the adjacent River Thames. Watermans Park is a landscaped open space alongside the Thames, with an area of appropriately 1.1 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 and 40A High Street, Brentford, London
    Our ref: APP/F5540/V/19/3226900 Mr Tom Horne Your ref: 00607/T/P1 DP9 Limited 100 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5NQ 31 March 2021 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 77 APPLICATION MADE BY BLUESCAPE LIMITED LAND AT 40 & 40A HIGH STREET, BRENTFORD, LONDON, TW8 0DS APPLICATION REF: 00607/T/P1 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Michael Boniface MSc MRTPI who held a public local inquiry on 6-9, 13-16 and 22 October 2020 into your client’s application for planning permission for demolition of the existing office building and Arts Centre to provide 193 new dwellings within buildings of part 6, part 7 storeys (Class C3), with ancillary ground floor retail/café, hard and soft landscaping, revised vehicular access and all necessary enabling and ancillary works, application reference 00607/T/P1, dated 4 August 2017. 2. On 15 April 2019, the Secretary of State directed, in pursuance of Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, that your client’s application be referred to him instead of being dealt with by the local planning authority. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be approved. 4. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions, and agrees with his recommendation. He has decided to grant permission. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report.
    [Show full text]