Can Aggregation Behaviour of <I>Phrynomantis Microps</I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A New Family of Diverse Skin Peptides from the Microhylid Frog Genus Phrynomantis
molecules Article A New Family of Diverse Skin Peptides from the Microhylid Frog Genus Phrynomantis Constantijn Raaymakers 1,2, Benoit Stijlemans 3,4, Charlotte Martin 5, Shabnam Zaman 1 , Steven Ballet 5, An Martel 2, Frank Pasmans 2 and Kim Roelants 1,* 1 Amphibian Evolution Lab, Biology Department, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (S.Z.) 2 Wildlife Health Ghent, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (F.P.) 3 Unit of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; [email protected] 4 Myeloid Cell Immunology Lab, VIB Centre for Inflammation Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium 5 Research Group of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Department of Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (S.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-26293410 Received: 17 January 2020; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 18 February 2020 Abstract: A wide range of frogs produce skin poisons composed of bioactive peptides for defence against pathogens, parasites and predators. While several frog families have been thoroughly screened for skin-secreted peptides, others, like the Microhylidae, have remained mostly unexplored. Previous studies of microhylids found no evidence of peptide secretion, suggesting that this defence adaptation was evolutionarily lost. We conducted transcriptome analyses of the skins of Phrynomantis bifasciatus and Phrynomantis microps, two African microhylid species long suspected to be poisonous. -
La Biodiversité En Côte D'ivoire : Etat Des Lieux Et Facteurs De Menace
La biodiversité en Côte d’Ivoire : Etat des lieux et facteurs de menace 5 Biodiversity of Côte d’Ivoire: Current state and threats L’une des caractéristiques les plus fascinantes de la nature est la diversité des êtres vivants dont elle regorge. La biodiversité est définit simplement comme la diversité de toutes les formes du vivant, incluant la diversité génétique, spécifique et écosystémique. Elle constitue la toile de la vie terrestre et aquatique dont nous sommes partie intégrante et dont nous dépendons totalement pour notre bien être et notre survie. Elle atteint son maximum dans les régions tropicales dont les forêts abritent plus de 50 % de la diversité biologique mondiale. En Côte d’Ivoire, la conservation de la biodiversité est une question majeure au regard de son importance et des menaces fréquentes qui pèsent sur elle. En effet, de par la diversité et la particularité de sa flore et de sa faune, la Côte d’Ivoire fait partie des zones prioritaires de conservationhot ( spot de biodiversité) en Afrique de l’Ouest. Cependant cette diversité biologique est fortement menacée par de nombreux facteurs dont les plus importants sont la déforestation, l’agriculture non durable, le braconnage, la pollution et les changements climatiques. Ces menaces qui affectent considérablement aussi bien les écosystè- mes que les organismes vivants qu’ils abritent, ont un effet déterminant sur l’économie et la qualité de la vie humaine. Ce chapitre a pour objectif de faire un état des lieux de la biodiversité en Côte d’Ivoire et d’identifier les facteurs pouvant menacer sa conservation. Il comprend trois parties qui s’articulent autour des composantes essentielles de la biodiversité. -
Addis Ababa University Science Faculty School of Graduate Studies Department of Environmental Science Zoology Module
ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCIENCE FACULTY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ZOOLOGY MODULE AN INVESTIGATION OF AMPHIBIAN DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE IN HARENNA FOREST, BALE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK, ETHIOPIA A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Environmental Science By Roman Kassahun Advisors: Professor Samy A.Saber, A.A.U. Ethiopia Dr. Simon Loader, Institute of Biogeography, Basel, Switzerland July, 2009 ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES An investigation of Amphibian diversity and abundance in relation to environmental change in Harenna Forest, Bale Mountains National Park. By Roman Kassahun A Thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Environmental Science Approved by Examining Board: _______________________ _____________ _____________________________ ________________ _____________________________ ________________ ______________________________ ________________ Acknowledgement I owe my sincere gratitude to my adviser Prof Samy A. Saber for his advice and encouragement prior to the start of research work and for his enormously consistent and valuable guidance and advice without which this research project would not have been realized. I am also grateful to my Co-advisor Dr. Simon Loader from the University of Basel, for the logistical support and great help during the wet season of the project, for his guidance in the identifications of the specimens and for giving me this opportunity in the first place. My gratitude also goes to the Ethiopian Wild Life Conservation Authority (EWCA) for allowing me to pursue the M.S.C. -
Original Articles
ORIGINAL ARTICLES NO~OUSTOADSANDFROGSOF all over the body, whereas granular glands are localised in special regions, such as the paratoid poison glands behind the SOUTH AFRICA head in toads. Because of their locality the paratoid glands, which do not secrete saliva, are often erroneously referred to as L Pantanowitz, TW aude, A Leisewitz 'parotid' glands. Granular glands produce a thicker, more toxic secretion. However, secretion from both mucous and granular glands may be poisonous.' While nearly all amphibians have a The major defence mechanism in frogs is via the secretion of trace of toxin in their skin: this is not equally developed in the toxins from their skin. In humans, intoxication may occur different genera. Both gland types are under the control of when part of the amphibian integument is ingested, as in the sympathetic nerves and discharge following a variety of l form of herbal medicines. Two groups of South African frogs stimuli. " Mucous glands secrete mainly when stimulated by have skin secretions that are potentially lethal to humans and dryness, whereas granular glands require pressure, injury or animals. Toad (BlIfo and Schismademla pecies), the any stress to the animal to cause secretion."'" With some amphibian with which man and his pets most frequently exceptions, notably BI/fv lIlaril/lIS (not a South African toad), have contact, secrete potent toxins with cardiac glycoside pre-metamorphic larvae lack toxic properties as granular activity. Topical and systemic intoxication, while seen in glands develop only at metamorphosis." humans, remains predominantly a veterinary problem. Amphibians are not equipped for speed, nor do they have Intoxication by the red-banded rubber frog, which secretes an any armament; as such they rely predominantly on chemical unidentified cardiotoxin, is far less common. -
Hand and Foot Musculature of Anura: Structure, Homology, Terminology, and Synapomorphies for Major Clades
HAND AND FOOT MUSCULATURE OF ANURA: STRUCTURE, HOMOLOGY, TERMINOLOGY, AND SYNAPOMORPHIES FOR MAJOR CLADES BORIS L. BLOTTO, MARTÍN O. PEREYRA, TARAN GRANT, AND JULIÁN FAIVOVICH BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY HAND AND FOOT MUSCULATURE OF ANURA: STRUCTURE, HOMOLOGY, TERMINOLOGY, AND SYNAPOMORPHIES FOR MAJOR CLADES BORIS L. BLOTTO Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina MARTÍN O. PEREYRA División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva “Claudio J. Bidau,” Instituto de Biología Subtropical–CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina TARAN GRANT Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Coleção de Anfíbios, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Research Associate, Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History JULIÁN FAIVOVICH División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Research Associate, Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American -
Standard Guidelines for the Captive Keeping of Anurans
Standard Guidelines for the Captive Keeping of Anurans Developed by the Workgroup Anurans of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde (DGHT) e. V. Informations about the booklet The amphibian table benefi ted from the participation of the following specialists: Dr. Beat Akeret: Zoologist, Ecologist and Scientist in Nature Conserva- tion; President of the DGHT Regional Group Switzerland and the DGHT City Group Zurich Dr. Samuel Furrer: Zoologist; Curator of Amphibians and Reptiles of the Zurich Zoological Gardens (until 2017) Prof. Dr. Stefan Lötters: Zoologist; Docent at the University of Trier for Herpeto- logy, specialising in amphibians; Member of the Board of the DGHT Workgroup Anurans Dr. Peter Janzen: Zoologist, specialising in amphibians; Chairman and Coordinator of the Conservation Breeding Project “Amphibian Ark” Detlef Papenfuß, Ulrich Schmidt, Ralf Schmitt, Stefan Ziesmann, Frank Malz- korn: Members of the Board of the DGHT Workgroup Anurans Dr. Axel Kwet: Zoologist, amphibian specialist; Management and Editorial Board of the DGHT Bianca Opitz: Layout and Typesetting Thomas Ulber: Translation, Herprint International A wide range of other specialists provided important additional information and details that have been Oophaga pumilio incorporated in the amphibian table. Poison Dart Frog page 2 Foreword Dear Reader, keeping anurans in an expertly manner means taking an interest in one of the most fascinating groups of animals that, at the same time, is a symbol of the current threats to global biodiversity and an indicator of progressing climate change. The contribution that private terrarium keeping is able to make to researching the biology of anurans is evident from the countless publications that have been the result of individuals dedicating themselves to this most attractive sector of herpetology. -
1704632114.Full.Pdf
Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous PNAS PLUS diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary Yan-Jie Fenga, David C. Blackburnb, Dan Lianga, David M. Hillisc, David B. Waked,1, David C. Cannatellac,1, and Peng Zhanga,1 aState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; bDepartment of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by David B. Wake, June 2, 2017 (sent for review March 22, 2017; reviewed by S. Blair Hedges and Jonathan B. Losos) Frogs (Anura) are one of the most diverse groups of vertebrates The poor resolution for many nodes in anuran phylogeny is and comprise nearly 90% of living amphibian species. Their world- likely a result of the small number of molecular markers tra- wide distribution and diverse biology make them well-suited for ditionally used for these analyses. Previous large-scale studies assessing fundamental questions in evolution, ecology, and conser- used 6 genes (∼4,700 nt) (4), 5 genes (∼3,800 nt) (5), 12 genes vation. However, despite their scientific importance, the evolutionary (6) with ∼12,000 nt of GenBank data (but with ∼80% missing history and tempo of frog diversification remain poorly understood. data), and whole mitochondrial genomes (∼11,000 nt) (7). In By using a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 88-kb the larger datasets (e.g., ref. -
Supporting Information Tables
Mapping the Global Emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus Deanna H. Olson, David M. Aanensen, Kathryn L. Ronnenberg, Christopher I. Powell, Susan F. Walker, Jon Bielby, Trenton W. J. Garner, George Weaver, the Bd Mapping Group, and Matthew C. Fisher Supplemental Information Taxonomic Notes Genera were assigned to families for summarization (Table 1 in main text) and analysis (Table 2 in main text) based on the most recent available comprehensive taxonomic references (Frost et al. 2006, Frost 2008, Frost 2009, Frost 2011). We chose recent family designations to explore patterns of Bd susceptibility and occurrence because these classifications were based on both genetic and morphological data, and hence may more likely yield meaningful inference. Some North American species were assigned to genus according to Crother (2008), and dendrobatid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Grant et al. (2006). Eleutherodactylid frogs were assigned to family and genus based on Hedges et al. (2008); centrolenid frogs based on Cisneros-Heredia et al. (2007). For the eleutherodactylid frogs of Central and South America and the Caribbean, older sources count them among the Leptodactylidae, whereas Frost et al. (2006) put them in the family Brachycephalidae. More recent work (Heinicke et al. 2007) suggests that most of the genera that were once “Eleutherodactylus” (including those species currently assigned to the genera Eleutherodactylus, Craugastor, Euhyas, Phrynopus, and Pristimantis and assorted others), may belong in a separate, or even several different new families. Subsequent work (Hedges et al. 2008) has divided them among three families, the Craugastoridae, the Eleutherodactylidae, and the Strabomantidae, which were used in our classification. -
Padial Et Al
Padial, Crochet, Geniez, Brito – Amphibian Conservation in Mauritania 1 AMPHIBIAN CONSERVATION IN MAURITANIA José Manuel Padial1, Pierre-André Crochet2, Philippe Geniez3, and José Carlos Brito4 1Department of Evolution Genomics and Systematics, Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC), Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala 75236, Sweden. 2EPHE-UMR 5175 Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, 1919, route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. 3CNRS-UMR 5175 Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, 1919, route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier cedex 5, France. 4CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos da Universidade do Porto, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias de Vairão, R. Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], pierre- [email protected], [email protected] I. INTRODUCTION II. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION III. CONSERVATION STATUS IV. RECOMMENDATIONS V. REFERENCES Padial, Crochet, Geniez, Brito – Amphibian Conservation in Mauritania 2 I. INTRODUCTION Three quarters of Mauritania’s one million square kilometers is Sahara desert; Mauritania does not have high amphibian diversity. Only eleven widely-distributed anuran species have been recorded for the country (Table 1; Nickel 2003; Padial & De la Riva 2004), and all are categorized as species of least concern by the IUCN (2009). Mauritanian territory is largely unexplored, however, and it is likely that some of the 19 anuran species recorded from adjacent areas of neighboring countries could occur within its borders. In addition, the taxonomy of most broadly-distributed anuran species in Africa, including those cited for Mauritania (Ptychadena spp. [Ptychadenidae]; Amietophrynus spp. [Bufonidae]; Tomopterna spp. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of African Microhylid Frogs Inferred from DNA Sequences of Mitochondrial 12S and 16S Rrna Genes Simon P
ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 4 (2004) 227–235 www.elsevier.de/ode Phylogenetic relationships of African microhylid frogs inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes Simon P. Loadera,b,c,Ã, David J. Gowera, Kim M. Howelld, Nike Doggarte, Mark-Oliver Ro¨ delf, Barry T. Clarkea, Rafael O. de Sa´ g, Bernard L. Cohenb, Mark Wilkinsona aDepartment of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK bDivision of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Pontecorvo Building, 56 Dumbarton Road, Glasgow G11 6NU, UK cFrontier, 50-52 Rivington Street, London EC2A 3QP, UK dDepartment of Zoology and Marine Biology, University of Dar es Salaam, PO Box 35064, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania eTanzania Forest Conservation Group, PO Box 23410, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania fDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Zoology III, Biocenter, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wu¨rzburg, Germany gDepartment of Biology, University of Richmond, VA 23173, USA Received 31 October 2003; accepted 26 January 2004 Abstract The phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs are poorly understood. The first molecular phylogeny for continental African microhylids is presented, including representatives of all subfamilies, six of the eight genera, and the enigmatic hemisotid Hemisus. Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequence data were analysed using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian methods. Analyses of the data are consistent with the monophyly of all sampled subfamilies and genera. Hemisus does not nest within either brevicipitines or non-brevicipitines. It is possibly the sister group to brevicipitines, in which case brevicipitines might not be microhylids. Phrynomantis and Hoplophryne potentially group with non-African, non-brevicipitine microhylids, in agreement with recent morphological and molecular data. -
Of Burkina Faso
zoosystema 2020 42 28 List of amphibian species (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda) of Burkina Faso Halamoussa Joëlle AYORO, Gabriel Hoinsoudé SEGNIAGBETO, Emmanuel Midibahaye HEMA, Johannes PENNER, Adama OUEDA, Alain DUBOIS, Mark-Oliver RÖDEL, Gustave Boureima KABRÉ & Annemarie OHLER art. 42 (28) — Published on 5 November 2020 www.zoosystema.com DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR : Bruno David Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Laure Desutter-Grandcolas ASSISTANTE DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITORS : Anne Mabille ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Fariza Sissi COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE / SCIENTIFIC BOARD : James Carpenter (AMNH, New York, États-Unis) Maria Marta Cigliano (Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentine) Henrik Enghoff (NHMD, Copenhague, Danemark) Rafael Marquez (CSIC, Madrid, Espagne) Peter Ng (University of Singapore) Jean-Yves Rasplus (INRA, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France) Jean-François Silvain (IRD, Gif-sur-Yvette, France) Wanda M. Weiner (Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracovie, Pologne) John Wenzel (The Ohio State University, Columbus, États-Unis) COUVERTURE / COVER : Ptychadena pumilio (Boulenger, 1920). Photo: Halamoussa Joëlle Ayoro. Zoosystema est indexé dans / Zoosystema is indexed in: – Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) – ISI Alerting Services® – Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology, and Environmental Sciences® – Scopus® Zoosystema est distribué en version électronique par / Zoosystema is distributed electronically by: – BioOne® (http://www.bioone.org) -
Morphological and Kinematic Specializations of Walking Frogs
Received: 3 May 2018 Accepted: 7 May 2018 DOI: 10.1002/jez.2182 RESEARCH ARTICLE Morphological and kinematic specializations of walking frogs Crystal M. Reynaga1 Henry C. Astley2 Emanuel Azizi1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, Abstract California The anuran body plan is defined by morphological features associated with saltatory locomotion, 2Biomimicry Research & Innovation Center, but these specializations may have functional consequences for other modes of locomotion. Sev- Departments of Biology and Polymer Science, eral frog species use a quadrupedal walking gait as their primary mode of locomotion, character- University of Akron, Akron, Ohio ized by limbs that move in diagonal pairs. Here, we examine how walking species may deviate from Correspondence the ancestral body plan and how the kinematics of a quadrupedal gait are modified to accommo- Crystal M. Reynaga, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, date the anuran body plan. We use a comparative analysis of limb lengths to test the hypothesis Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, CA 92697. that quadrupedal anurans shift away from the standard anuran condition defined by short fore- Email: [email protected] limbs and long hindlimbs. We also use three-dimensional high-speed videography in four anuran Funding information species (Kassina senegalensis, Melanophryniscus stelzneri, Phrynomantis bifasciatus,andPhyllomedusa Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biol- ogy, University of California, Irvine; Graduate hypochondrialis) to characterize footfall patterns and body posture during quadrupedal locomo- Division, University of California, Irvine; Office tion, measuring the angle and timing of joint excursions in the fore- and hindlimb during walk- of Postsecondary Education, Grant/Award ing to compare kinematics between limbs of disparate lengths.