Arthur Tappan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arthur Tappan ARTHUR TAPPAN Lewis Tappan and Arthur Tappan were descendants of Benjamin Franklin (which is perhaps why their father, and another brother, happened to be named Benjamin Tappan). Arthur received a common-school education and then served a 7- year apprenticeship in the hardware business in Boston, before establishing himself in Portland, Maine, and subsequently in Montreal, Canada, where he would remain until the beginning of the war of 1812. In 1814 he would engage with his brother Lewis in importing British dry-goods into New-York City, and after that partnership was dissolved he successfully continued the business alone. He was known for his public spirit and philanthropy. He was a founder of the American tract society, the largest donor for the erection of its 1st building, and was identified with many charitable and religious bodies. He was a founder of Oberlin College, also erecting Tappan Hall there, and endowed Lane Seminary in Cincinnati, and a professorship at Auburn Theological Seminary. With his brother Lewis he founded the New-York Journal of Commerce in 1828, and established The Emancipator in 1833, paying the salary of the editor and all the expenses of its publication. He was an ardent abolitionist, and as the interest in the anti-slavery cause deepened he formed, at his own rooms, the nucleus of the New-York antislavery society, which was publicly organized under his presidency at Clinton Hall on October 2, 1833. He was also president of the American Anti-Slavery Society, to which for several years he contributed $1,000 per month, but withdrew in 1840 on account of the aggressive spirit that many members manifested toward the churches and the Union. During the crisis of 1837 he was forced to suspend payments, and in 1842 he became bankrupt. During his late years he was connected with the mercantile agency that his brother Lewis established. He incurred the hatred of southern slaveholders by his frequent aid to fugitives, and by his rescuing of William Lloyd Garrison from imprisonment at Baltimore. See LIFE by Lewis Tappan (New York, 1871). HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1786 May 22, Monday: Sarah Holmes Tappan, mother of Benjamin Tappan, Jr. and William Tappan, gave birth to Arthur Tappan, who all his life would be tortured by headaches. TAPPAN FAMILY HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1788 May 26, Monday: Sarah Tappan gave birth to Lewis Tappan, the younger brother of Benjamin Tappan, Jr., William Tappan, and Arthur Tappan, with the assistance of midwife “Granny” Allen — who charged mothers $1.00 for this service. TAPPAN FAMILY HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1803 April 27, Wednesday: Emperor Franz II gave assent to the Reichsdeputationshauptschluss, a massive reorganization of the German Empire. The number of imperial cities was reduced to six; only three church states remained; the Duke of Salzburg became an elector of the Empire; the Rhineland Palatinate was made part of Bavaria (this was all fueled of course by the gains that larger states were making at the expense of smaller ones). David Tappan, who had been the Hollis Professor of Divinity at Harvard College, and the uncle of Lewis Tappan and Arthur Tappan, died in Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr. Henry Ware, Harvard Class of 1785, would not be appointed to succeed him in this chair until May 1805; meanwhile young resident graduates such as Charles Wellington of Waltham, Massachusetts would be obliged to struggle alone with a list of books the professor had recommended for their perusal, and meet together occasionally for reading of their essays and comparison of views). TAPPAN FAMILY HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1815 00 Arthur Tappan borrowed $12,000. from Lewis Tappan without interest, to start an import firm in New-York. TAPPAN FAMILY HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1821 The lawyer Charles Grandison Finney persuaded himself that he was the beneficiary of a “retainer from the Lord Jesus Christ to plead His cause.” He began a career of helping himself by helping others that would make him into “the father of modern revivalism.” His highly charged preaching often accomplished an emotional catharsis which was then known as the “salvation experience” and which then was considered to need to prove itself through social action. Finney was a close friend of the rich men Lewis Tappan and Arthur Tappan, who rented the Chatham Street Theater in New-York for his use. Revivalism, Salvation, and Abolitionism — TAPPAN FAMILY enslavement equals sin: When I first went to New York, I had made up my mind on the question of slavery, and was exceedingly anxious to arouse public attention to the subject. I did not, however, turn aside to make it a hobby, or divert the attention of the people from the work of converting souls. It was sin but if it was merely a sin of other persons, then it was a secondary issue to the issue of one’s own personal salvation, and the evil of this sin was to be explored, Finney’s attitude was, only if it “can be made an appendage of a general revival.” Finney was as alienated by radical anti-slavery talk as he was by slavery itself. Although he would not allow slavemasters to join his church, he also was hostile to the idea of blacks and whites sitting together in church. As a matter of fact, he was even hostile to the idea of two choirs, one black and one white, being permitted to sing the same hymns at the same time. The slave Johann Samuel died poor and marginalized in the white Moravian religious community which in HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1771 had accepted him. At first his white coreligionists has been able to accept him more or less as a peer, albeit enslaved, but over the years there had been a dwindling commitment among Moravians to the equality of all true believers in their faith. His black children would be acceptable only within a new black church sponsored by the Moravians. For more on this, consult Jon F. Sensbach’s A SEPARATE CANAAN: THE MAKING OF AN AFRO-MORAVIAN WORLD IN NORTH CAROLINA, 1763-1840 (Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1998). A rump group of Northern congressmen nominated John Caldwell Calhoun for president. –Three times this man would see a chance to get himself made president, and three times there would be an autobiographical campaign biography produced (anonymous of course and written in the third person). LET US CONQUER SPACE. Sam Houston resigned from the office of Attorney General of the Nashville District in Tennessee to return to private law practice. HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1825 May 11, Wednesday: In New-York City, Arthur Tappan helped create the American Tract Society. TAPPAN FAMILY In Rochester, New York, Austin Steward, a man of substance and property, was able to marry: As time passed on I found myself progressing in a profitable business. I had paid for my house and lot, and purchased another adjoining, on which I had erected a valuable brick building. The Lord prospered all my undertakings and I felt grateful for my good fortune. I kept all kinds of groceries and grain, which met a ready sale; and now I began to look about me for a partner in life, to share my joys and sorrows, and to assist me on through the tempestuous scenes of a life-long voyage. Such a companion I found in the intelligent and amiable Miss B-----, to whom I was married on the eleventh of May, 1825. She was the youngest daughter of a particular friend, who had traveled extensively and was noted for his honesty and intelligence. About this time, too, “Sam Patch” made his last and fatal leap from a scaffold twenty five feet above the falls of Genesee, which are ninety-six feet in height. From thence he plunged into the foaming river to rise no more in life. The following spring the body of the foolish man was found and buried, after having lain several months in the turbulent waters of the Genesee. This year was also rendered memorable by the efficient labors of Professor Finney, through whose faithful preaching of the HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN gospel, many were brought to a saving knowledge of the truth. HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN 1827 Mid-August: Lewis Tappan was asked to come from his home in Brookline to New-York to help his brother Arthur Tappan, “Saint Arthur the Silk Jobber,” cope with the fall business rush at his store at 122 Pearl Street. This was a fashionable location near Hanover Square, a three-story granite structure with great iron shutters to protect the trade windows on the ground floor, and with a wooden sidewalk to protect the skirts of the shoppers from the mud and slop of the city pavement. Once his brother had him safely under his thumb in New-York, he began to work on his unfortunate susceptibility to liberal causes. Arthur’s weapons, in the struggle against Unitarian heresy, would prove to be not only intellectual and emotional but also the threat of pecuniary punishment and the promise of pecuniary reward. TAPPAN FAMILY HDT WHAT? INDEX ARTHUR TAPPAN ARTHUR TAPPAN October 8, Monday: In New-York, Lewis Tappan was beginning to feel the heat of his brother Arthur Tappan’s resistance to the Unitarian heresy: TAPPAN FAMILY He should be sorry to have me come here to be very active as a Unitarian, in religious matters — building churches, etc. I replied that for sometime I had felt that I might be under some temptation to swerve from my religious opinions from secular or pecuniary considerations; that he must be sensible it was my duty scrupulously to keep my mind unbiased by pecuniary considerations; that I should endeavour to act conscientiously; that I was free to acknowledge that my mind had undergone some change & that I should not be active in propagating Unitarian sentiments, with my present views; and that if my mind should alter, on this subject, and I should feel it my duty to make such efforts I should be willing to dissolve any connexion in business, I might form, if he wished it.
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Self-Discipline: the Power to Expel, to Exclude and to Punish
    Fordham Law Review Volume 41 Issue 1 Article 2 1972 Congressional Self-Discipline: The Power to Expel, to Exclude and to Punish Gerald T. McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gerald T. McLaughlin, Congressional Self-Discipline: The Power to Expel, to Exclude and to Punish, 41 Fordham L. Rev. 43 (1972). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol41/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Congressional Self-Discipline: The Power to Expel, to Exclude and to Punish Cover Page Footnote Associate Professor of Law, Fordham University. Professor McLaughlin received his B.A. from Fordham University, and his LL.B from New York University, where he was Managing Editor of the Law Review. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol41/iss1/2 CONGRESSIONAL SELF-DISCIPLINE: THE POWER TO EXPEL, TO EXCLUDE AND TO PUNISH GERALD T. McLAUGHLIN* R ECENT events have again focused attention on Congress' power to discipline its members for personal misconduct. On April 19, 1972, the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct1 recommended that Texas Representative John Dowdy be stripped of his right to vote on the floor of the House or in committee as a result of his conviction for bribery and perjury.2 On that same day, two Senators argued before the Supreme Court that the Constitution forbids the executive branch from investigating the official conduct of a member of Congress, and delegates all responsibil- ity for punishing members' wrongdoing to each house of Congress.3 Finally, on June 29, 1972, a Supreme Court majority in United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University M crct. rrs it'terrjt onai A Be" 4 Howe1 ir”?r'"a! Cor"ear-, J00 Norte CeeD Road App Artjor mi 4 6 ‘Og ' 346 USA 3 13 761-4’00 600 sC -0600 Order Number 9238197 Selected literary letters of Sophia Peabody Hawthorne, 1842-1853 Hurst, Nancy Luanne Jenkins, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Expulsion and Censure Actions Taken by the Full Senate Against Members
    Order Code 93-875 Expulsion and Censure Actions Taken by the Full Senate Against Members Updated November 12, 2008 Jack Maskell Legislative Attorney American Law Division Expulsion and Censure Actions Taken by the Full Senate Against Members Summary The authority of the United States Senate (as well as of the House) to establish the rules for its own proceedings, to “punish” its Members for misconduct, and to expel a Member by a vote of two-thirds of Members present and voting, is provided in the Constitution at Article I, Section 5, clause 2. This express grant of authority for the Senate to expel a Senator is, on its face, unlimited — save for the requirement of a two-thirds majority. In the context of what the Supreme Court has characterized as, in effect, an “unbridled discretion” of the body, expulsions in the Senate, as well as the House, have historically been reserved for cases of the most serious misconduct: disloyalty to the government or abuses of one’s official position. The Senate has actually expelled only 15 Members — 14 of those during the Civil War period for disloyalty to the Union (one of these expulsions was subsequently revoked by the Senate), and the other Senator during the late 1700s for disloyal conduct. The House of Representatives has expelled only five Members in its history, three during the Civil War period, one in 1980, and another in 2002, after convictions for bribery and corruption offenses related to official congressional duties. In the Senate, as well as in the House, however, other Members for whom expulsion was recommended have resigned from office prior to official, formal action by the institution.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sumner, Charles. the Selected Letters of Charles Sumner. Edited
    Sumner, Charles. The Selected Letters of Charles Sumner. Edited by Beverly Wilson Palmer. 2 vols. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990. Vol. 2 Lawyers and politicians, 20 Lincoln, Seward, Sumner, Chicago convention nomination, 23-24 Law, barbarism of slavery, Lewis Tappan, 26 Crime Against Kansas speech, 29-30 Fugitive slave law, 31-32 Election, Lincoln, secession threats, 34 Seward, 37 Secession, 37ff Secession and possible civil war, 38-39 Thurlow Weed, Lincoln, Winfield Scott, 40-41 Scott, Seward, 42 John A. Andrew, no compromise, 43, 47-48 Fears compromise and surrender, 44 Massachusetts men need to stand firm, 46 Massachusetts, Buchanan, Crittenden compromise, 50-51 Personal liberty laws, 51-52 Fort Sumter, forts, 53 Virginia secession election, 54 New Mexico compromise, 55-57 Lincoln, 59 Lincoln and office seekers, 64 Seward influence, 64 Lincoln and war, 65 Northern unity, Lincoln, 69 John Lothrop Motley, 70-71 Congressional session, legislation, 71-72 Blockade, 73 Bull Run defeat, Lincoln, 74 Cameron and contrabands, 75 Lincoln, duty of emancipation, 76 William Howard Russell, Bull Run, 76-78 Slavery, Frémont, Lincoln, 79 Frémont, 80 Wendell Phillips, Sumner speech on slavery, 80 Slavery, English opinion, emancipation, Cameron, contraband order, 81-87 War, slavery, tariff, 82 Trent affair, Mason and Slidell, 85-94 Charles Stone, 95 Lieber, Stanton, Trent affair, 98 Stanton, 99 Lincoln, Chase, 100 Davis and Lincoln, 101 1 Andrew, McClellan, Lincoln, 103 Establishing territorial governments in rebel states, 103-8 Fugitive
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lincoln, Kentucky African Americans and the Constitution
    Abraham Lincoln, Kentucky African Americans and the Constitution Kentucky African American Heritage Commission Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Collection of Essays Abraham Lincoln, Kentucky African Americans and the Constitution Kentucky African American Heritage Commission Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Collection of Essays Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission Kentucky Heritage Council © Essays compiled by Alicestyne Turley, Director Underground Railroad Research Institute University of Louisville, Department of Pan African Studies for the Kentucky African American Heritage Commission, Frankfort, KY February 2010 Series Sponsors: Kentucky African American Heritage Commission Kentucky Historical Society Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission Kentucky Heritage Council Underground Railroad Research Institute Kentucky State Parks Centre College Georgetown College Lincoln Memorial University University of Louisville Department of Pan African Studies Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission The Kentucky Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission (KALBC) was established by executive order in 2004 to organize and coordinate the state's commemorative activities in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the birth of President Abraham Lincoln. Its mission is to ensure that Lincoln's Kentucky story is an essential part of the national celebration, emphasizing Kentucky's contribution to his thoughts and ideals. The Commission also serves as coordinator of statewide efforts to convey Lincoln's Kentucky story and his legacy of freedom, democracy, and equal opportunity for all. Kentucky African American Heritage Commission [Enabling legislation KRS. 171.800] It is the mission of the Kentucky African American Heritage Commission to identify and promote awareness of significant African American history and influence upon the history and culture of Kentucky and to support and encourage the preservation of Kentucky African American heritage and historic sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholics, Slaveholders, and the Dilemma of American Evangelicalism, 1835–1860 / W
    Catholics, Slaveholders, and the Dilemma of American Evangelicalism, 1835 –1860 W. J ASON WALLACE University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana © 2010 University of Notre Dame Press Copyright © 2010 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 www.undpress.nd.edu All Rights Reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wallace, William Jason. Catholics, slaveholders, and the dilemma of American evangelicalism, 1835–1860 / W. Jason Wallace. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-268-04421-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-268-04421-X (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States—Church history—19th century. 2. Evangelicalism— United States—History—19th century. 3. Catholic Church— United States—History—19th century. 4. Slavery—United States— History—19th century. 5. Christianity and politics—United States— History—19th century. I. Title. BR525.W34 2010 282'.7509034—dc22 2010024340 ∞ The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. © 2010 University of Notre Dame Press Introduction Between 1835 and 1860, evangelical pulpits and religious journals in the North aggressively attacked slaveholders and Catholics as threats to American values. Criticisms of these two groups could often be found in the same northern evangelical journal, if not on the same page. Words such as “despotism” and “tyranny” described both the theological condi- tion of the Catholic Church and the political condition of the South. Slavery and Catholicism were labeled incompatible with republican insti- tutions and bereft of the virtues necessary to sustain a democratic people.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery and Antislavery Literature
    SLAVERY AND ANTISLAVERY LITERATURE: In the centennial year of Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation (issued January 1, 1863), it is appropriate to survey the literature on slavery and the antislavery crusade deposited in the Uni- versity Library. Although by no means approaching in breadth the great collections at, for ex- ample, Cornell, Oberlin, and the New York Public Library, this literature is still both rich and varied; it stretches over a period of three centuries, encompasses three continents, and in- cludes the great name·s in the antislavery movements of Great Britain and the United States. It is fitting that a state whose inception-is inextricably linked with the slavery issue should possess such a collection. Watson Library and its branches house upward of 750 volumes devoted to the subject of chattel slavery and its abolition. Only a fraction of the periodical literature and state papers is includ- ed in this total. A little more than half of these volumes is contemporaneous with the institution of slavery in the Western world, falling chiefly in the period prior to 1865. Of this contempo- rary literature, approximately two-thirds concerns the United States, and one-third the British Empire. There are also works on slavery in the Spanish, Portuguese, French, Dutch and Ger- man languages. To a very great extent Europeans exploited the resources of the New World with slave labor. American Indians, rather than Africans, were initially employed on Spanish plantations and mines, so much so in fact that their rapid decimation was viewed with alarm. Bartolome' de las Casas, known to posterity as the "Apostle of the Indians," attacked Indian servitude and achieved some success in persuading Spanish authorities to substitute Africans for Indians.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR a FUTURE of Peketjiktice
    WDMENS ENCAMPMENT FOR A FUTURE OF PEKEtJIKTICE SUMMER 1983'SENECA ARM/ DEPOTS 1590 WOMEN OF THE H0TINONSIONNE IROaiMS CONFEDERACY GATHER AT SENECA TO DEMAND AN END TO MMR AMONG THE NATIONS X 1800s A&0LITI0NIST5 M4KE SENECA COUNTY A MAJOR STOP ON THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD HITO HARRIET TUBMAW HOUSE NEAR THE PRESENT DAI ARMV DEPOTS EARL/ FEMINISTS HOLD FIRST WDMENS RIQHTS CONVENTION AT SENEGA FALLS ID CALL FOR SUFFRAGE & EQUAL MPTICJMTION IN ALL OTHEP AREAS OF LIFE ' TOD/W URBAN & RURA. WOMEN JOIN TOGETHER IN SENECA G0UNI7 TO CHALLENGE "ME NUCLEAR THREAT TO UFE ITSELF^ WE FOCUS ON THE WEAPONS AT 1UE SENECA ARMY DEPOT TO PREVENT DEPU)yMENT OF NATO MISSILES IN SOUDARITY WITH THE EUPOPE/W PEACE MO^MENT^ RESOURCE HANDBOOK Introduction The idea of a Women's Peace Camp in this country in solidarity with the Peace Camp movement in Europe and the Greenham Common Women's Peace Camp, in particular, was born at a Conference on Global Feminism and Disarmament on June 11, 1982. The organizing process began with discussions between Women's International League for Peace and Freedom and women in the Upstate Feminist Peace Alliance (NY), to consider siting the camp at the Seneca Army Depot in Romulus, NY. The planning meetings for the Encampment have since grown to include women from Toronto, Ottawa, Rochester, Oswego, Syracuse, Geneva, Ithaca, Albany, New York City, Boston, Philadelphia, and some of the smaller towns in between. Some of the tasks have been organized regionally and others have been done locally. Our planning meetings are open, and we are committed to consensus as our decision making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Prudence Crandall (1803-1890)
    NWHM Exhibit: The History of Women and Education Page 1 of 3 Biographies Prudence Crandall (1803-1890) Prudence Crandall was a remarkable woman who opened one of the first schools for African American girls, despite the ridicule and harassment she faced because of her actions. Prudence Crandall was born in Hopkinton, Rhode Island on September 3, 1803 to a Quaker family. She attended the New England Friends’ Boarding School in Providence, where she was able to study subjects such as arithmetic, Latin and the sciences. Although most women during the early 1800’s did not receive much education, Quakers (or Friends) believed that women should be educated. In October of 1831, Crandall opened a private girl’s academy in Canterbury, Connecticut. She taught the daughters of many of the town’s wealthy families, and the school was ranked as one of the best in the state. Her curriculum was rigorous, as she taught her female students much of the same material being taught at prominent schools for boys. In 1833, Crandall decided to admit an African American student named Sarah Harris, who wanted more education in order to become a teacher for African American children. The white students’ parents were outraged and demanded that Sarah Harris be expelled. Crandall, however, opposed slavery and believed in educating African Americans. She refused to expel the young student and decided instead to open a new school for African American girls. Prudence Crandall’s new school met with much hostility. The four most prominent men in the town of Canterbury arranged a meeting in which they told Crandall that they were intent on destroying her school.
    [Show full text]
  • K:\Fm Andrew\21 to 30\27.Xml
    TWENTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1841, TO MARCH 3, 1843 FIRST SESSION—May 31, 1841, to September 13, 1841 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1841, to August 31, 1842 THIRD SESSION—December 5, 1842, to March 3, 1843 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—March 4, 1841, to March 15, 1841 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—JOHN TYLER, 1 of Virginia PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—WILLIAM R. KING, 2 of Alabama; SAMUEL L. SOUTHARD, 3 of New Jersey; WILLIE P. MANGUM, 4 of North Carolina SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—ASBURY DICKENS, 5 of North Carolina SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—STEPHEN HAIGHT, of New York; EDWARD DYER, 6 of Maryland SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JOHN WHITE, 7 of Kentucky CLERK OF THE HOUSE—HUGH A. GARLAND, of Virginia; MATTHEW ST. CLAIR CLARKE, 8 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—RODERICK DORSEY, of Maryland; ELEAZOR M. TOWNSEND, 9 of Connecticut DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH FOLLANSBEE, of Massachusetts ALABAMA Jabez W. Huntington, Norwich John Macpherson Berrien, Savannah SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE REPRESENTATIVES 12 William R. King, Selma Joseph Trumbull, Hartford Julius C. Alford, Lagrange 10 13 Clement C. Clay, Huntsville William W. Boardman, New Haven Edward J. Black, Jacksonboro Arthur P. Bagby, 11 Tuscaloosa William C. Dawson, 14 Greensboro Thomas W. Williams, New London 15 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Thomas B. Osborne, Fairfield Walter T. Colquitt, Columbus Reuben Chapman, Somerville Eugenius A. Nisbet, 16 Macon Truman Smith, Litchfield 17 George S. Houston, Athens John H. Brockway, Ellington Mark A. Cooper, Columbus Dixon H. Lewis, Lowndesboro Thomas F.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Justice Stanton by James W
    At Sidebar Mr. Justice Stanton by James W. Satola I love U.S. Supreme Court history. Sometimes, the more arcane the better. So, for my At Sidebar con- tribution, I want to share a little bit of what I love.1 Perhaps calling to mind the well-known story behind Marbury v. Madison, here is a lesser-known story of a presidential commission not delivered on time (though in this case, it was not anyone’s fault). The story of Mr. Justice Edwin M. Stanton.2 James W. Satola is an As one walks through the Grand Concourse of attorney in Cleveland, Ohio. From 2010 to the Ohio Supreme Court building in Columbus, Ohio 2016, he served as (officially, the Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center, an FBA Circuit Vice which had a first life as the “Ohio Departments Build- President for the Sixth ing,” opening in 1933, then restored and reopened as Circuit, and from 2002 the home of the Ohio Supreme Court in 2004), one’s to 2003, he was Presi- dent of the FBA Northern eye is drawn to nine large bronze plaques mounted District of Ohio Chapter. on the East Wall, each showcasing one of the U.S. © 2017 James W. Satola. Supreme Court justices named from Ohio.3 This story All rights reserved. is about the fourth plaque in that series, under which reads in brass type on the marble wall, “Edwin Mc- Masters Stanton, Justice of the United States Supreme Court, 1869-1869.” Justice Stanton? One finds no mention of “Justice Stanton” among the lists of the 113 men and women who have served on the Supreme Court of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the original text directly from the copy submitted. Thus, some dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from a computer printer. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyrighted material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is available as one exposure on a standard 35 mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. 35 mm slides or 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ■UMIAccessing the Worlds Information since 1938 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA Order Number 8726748 Black 'women abolitionists: A study of gender and race in the American antislavery movement, 1828-1800 Yee, Shirley Jo>ann, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1987 Copyright ©1987 by Yee, Shirley Jo-ann. All rights reserved. UMI 300N. ZeebRd. Ann Aibor, MI 48106 BLACK WOMEN ABOLITIONISTS: A STUDY OF GENDER AND RACE IN THE AMERICAN ANTISLAVERY MOVEMENT, 1828-1860 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Shirley Jo-ann Yee, A.B., M.A * * * * * The Ohio State University 1987 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr.
    [Show full text]