DOCSLIB.ORG

Satellite Telemetry: a New Tool for Wildlife Research and Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Satellite Telemetry: a New Tool for Wildlife Research and Management Satellite Telemetry: A New Tool for Wildlife Research and Management - - --- __- ----..._ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service / Resource Publication 172 Resource Publication This publication of the Fish and Wildlife Service is one of a series of semitechnical or instructional materials dealing with investigations related to wildlife and fish. Each is published as a separate paper. The Service distributes a limited number of these reports for the use of Federal and State agencies and cooperators. A list of recent issues appears on inside back cover. Copies of this publication may be obtained from the Publications Unit, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Matomic Building, Room 148, Washington, DC 20240, or may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Satellite telemetry. (Resource publication ; 172) Bibliography: p. 1. Biotelemetry. 2. Earth stations (Satellite telecommuni­ cation) I. Fancy, Steve G. II. Series: Resource publication (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service); 172. S914.A3 no. 172a 333.95'4'0973 s 88-600161 [QH324.9.B5] [621.3815'2] Satellite Telemetry: A New Tool for Wildlife Research and Management By Steve G. Fancy Larry F. Pank David C. Douglas Catherine H. Curby Gerald W. Garner Steven C. Arnstrup Wayne L. Regelin UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Resource Publication 172 Washington, D.C. • 1988 Contents Page Abstract..................................................... 1 Overview of the Argos Data Collection and Location System . 2 History of Tracking Wildlife by Satellite . 4 Description of System Components . 6 Satellite Transmitters . 6 Satellites Used with the Data Collection and Location System . 6 Satellite Orbits . 9 Signal Acquisition and Transfer to Processing Centers . 13 Location Determination. 15 Applications to Wildlife Research and Management. 19 Transmitter Manufacturers, Specifications, and Costs . 19 Optimum Duty Cycles . 22 Sensor Development and Calibration. 24 Location Accuracy and Precision in Wildlife Applications . 26 Reliability of Transmitter Packages . 29 Real-time Processing with a Local User Terminal. 31 Effects of the Collar on the Animal . 33 Geographic Information Systems . 33 Conclusions. 36 Acknowledgments . 37 References . 38 Appendix A. Description of Software Package for Processing Argos Data . 44 Appendix B. Data Retrieval . 46 Argos File Types . 46 Dispose Files . 46 Telex Files . 48 Ajour File . 49 Argos Commands............................................ 49 Appendix C. Explanation of Satellite Orbital Elements . 52 Appendix D. Glossary . 53 Appendix E. Getting Started with Argos . 54 Satellite Telemetry: A New Tool for Wildlife Research and Management by Steve G. Fancy, 1 Larry F. Pank,2 David C. Douglas,2 Catherine H. Curby,1 Gerald W. Garner,2 Steven C. Amstrup,2 and Wayne L. Regelin3 Abstract The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game have cooperated since 1984 to develop and evaluate satellite telemetry as a means of overcom­ ing the high costs and logistical problems of conventional VHF (very high frequency) radio­ telemetry systems. Detailed locational and behavioral data on caribou (Rangifer tarandus), polar bears (Ursus maritimus), and other large mammals in Alaska have been obtained using the Argos Data Collection and Location System (DCLS). The Argos system, a cooperative project of the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales of France, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Aeronautics and Space Ad­ ministration, is designed to acquire environmental data on a routine basis from anywhere on earth. Transmitters weighing 1.6-2.0 kg and functioning approximately 12-18 months operated on a frequency of 401.650 MHz. Signals from the transmitters were received by Argos DCLS instruments aboard two Tiros-N weather satellites in sun-synchronous, near­ polar orbits. Data from the satellites were received at tracking stations, transferred to processing centers in Maryland and France, and made available to users via computer tape, printouts, or telephone links. · During 1985 and 1986, more than 25,000 locations and an additional 28,000 sets of sensor data (transmitter temperature and short-term and long-term indices of animal activity) were acquired for caribou and polar bears. Locations were calculated from the Doppler shift in the transmitted signal as the satellite approached and then moved away from the transmitter. The mean locational error for transmitters at known locations (n = 1,265) was 829 m; 90% of the calculated locations were within 1,700 m of the true location. Caribou transmitters provided a mean of 3.1 ( ± 5.0 SD) locations per day during 6 h of daily operation, and polar bear transmitters provided 1. 7 ( ± 6.9 SD) locations during 12 h of operation every third day. During the first 6 months of operation, the UHF (ultra-high frequency) signal failed on three of 32 caribou transmitters and 10 of 36 polar bear transmitters. A geographic information system (GIS) incorporating other data bases (e.g., land cover, elevation, slope, aspect, hydrology, ice distribution) was used to analyze and display detailed locational and behavioral data collected via satellite. Examples of GIS applications to research projects using satellite telemetry and examples of detailed movement patterns of caribou and polar bears are presented. This report includes documentation for computer software packages for processing Argos data and presents developments, as of March 1987, in transmitter design, data retrieval using a local user terminal, computer software, and sensor development and calibration. 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Re­ tu.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Fish and Wildlife Re­ search Center, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage, Alaska 99603. search Center, 101 12th Avenue, Box 20, Fairbanks, Alaska 3Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1300 College Road, Fair­ 99701. banks, Alaska 99701. 1 2 The ability to remotely locate and to obtain physio­ behavioral data on approximately 60 animals, in­ logical or behavioral data from free-ranging animals cluding polar bears (Ursus maritimus), caribou through use of biotelemetry techniques has resulted (Rangifer tarandus), muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus), in major advances in our understanding and manage­ and Dall sheep (Ovis dalli) in northern Alaska. These ment of wildlife populations. Radio-tracking of cooperative studies are being conducted by the U.S. animals using equipment operating in the VHF (very Fish and Wildlife Service, the Alaska Department high frequency) range of the electromagnetic spec­ of Fish and Game, the Arctic National Wildlife trum has become commonplace and has provided in­ Refuge, and the University of Alaska. We give ex­ formation not attainable by other means. However, amples of how the Argos system has been used to a major drawback of conventional VHF radio­ address a variety of research needs and explain pro­ tracking equipment, particularly in studies involv­ cedures we use to process and display locational data ing species that move long distances or inhabit using a geographic information system (GIS). remote or mountainous areas, is limited signal Third, this report describes a computer software range. This limited range often results in small or package we developed for processing and display­ incomplete data sets because data collection is con­ ing Argos data (Appendix A). These programs are strained by the high cost of getting to the animal available, for the cost of reproduction, to researchers and problems with harsh weather, darkness, worker using the Argos system to track animals. safety, and movements by the animal outside the On 1 April 1987, Argos introduced new software primary search area. for processing satellite telemetry data and opened The potential use of satellites for tracking and ob­ a second data-processing center in Landover, Mary­ taining physiological and other data from animals land. Except where noted, the results presented has been recognized for many years, but the tech­ here are based on data collected and analyzed before nology needed to construct accurate and reliable that date. Modifications and additions to the previ­ transmitters small enough to be attached to animals ous system are noted throughout the text. was not available until the early 1980's. The U.S. We also present preliminary findings from current Fish and Wildlife Service has been researching the research projects. The use of satellites to obtain data use of satellites to track wildlife since the mid-1970's on free-ranging animals is expanding rapidly, and when studies were initiated to track polar bears new developments and improved equipment become using the Nimbus satellite system (Kolz et al. 1980). available almost monthly. Other researchers have Since that time, numerous technological advances, used lightweight, solar-powered satellite trans­ most notably the availability of the Argos Data Col­ mitters to track large birds (Fuller et al. 1984; lection and Location System (DCLS) aboard Tiros-N Strikwerda et al. 1985, 1986), and we are now weather satellites and the development of batteries testing new units on gray wolves (Canis lupus), mule with a high power density, have made it possible to deer (Odocoileus hemionus), and walrus (Odobenus develop an accurate, reliable, and cost-effective rosmarus). Although the development of smaller,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRACKING and DATA ACQUISITION/ SPACE OPERATIONS **DB Chap 4(297-321) 1/17/02 12:29 PM Page 299
    **DB Chap 4(297-321) 1/17/02 12:29 PM Page 297 CHAPTER FOUR TRACKING AND DATA ACQUISITION/ SPACE OPERATIONS **DB Chap 4(297-321) 1/17/02 12:29 PM Page 299 CHAPTER FOUR TRACKING AND DATA ACQUISITION/ SPACE OPERATIONS Introduction NASA’s tracking and data acquisition program provided vital support for all NASA flight projects. NASA also supported, on a reimbursable basis, projects of the Department of Defense, other government agencies, commercial firms, and other countries and international organizations engaged in space research activities. The tracking and data acquisition program supported sounding rock- ets and balloons, research aircraft, Earth orbital and suborbital missions, planetary spacecraft, and deep space probes. The support included: • Tracking to determine the position and trajectory of vehicles in space • Acquisition of scientific and Earth applications data from on-board experiments and sensors • Acquisition of engineering data on the performance of spacecraft and launch vehicle systems • Transmission of commands from ground stations to spacecraft • Communication with astronauts • Communication of information among the various ground facilities and central control centers • Processing of data acquired from launch vehicles and spacecraft • Reception of television transmission from space vehicles NASA established three types of support capabilities: • The Spaceflight Tracking and Data Network (STDN) supported low- Earth orbital missions. • The Deep Space Network (DSN) supported planetary and interplane- tary flight missions. It also supported geosynchronous and highly elliptical missions and those in low-Earth orbit not compatible with the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS). • The TDRSS provided low-Earth orbital mission support and reduced NASA’s need for an extensive network of ground stations.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS)
    2525 YearsYears ofof IndianIndian RemoteRemote SensingSensing SatelliteSatellite (IRS)(IRS) SeriesSeries Vinay K Dadhwal Director National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), ISRO Hyderabad, INDIA 50 th Session of Scientific & Technical Subcommittee of COPUOS, 11-22 Feb., 2013, Vienna The Beginning • 1962 : Indian National Committee on Space Research (INCOSPAR), at PRL, Ahmedabad • 1963 : First Sounding Rocket launch from Thumba (Nov 21, 1963) • 1967 : Experimental Satellite Communication Earth Station (ESCES) established at Ahmedabad • 1969 : Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) established (15 August) PrePre IRSIRS --1A1A SatellitesSatellites • ARYABHATTA, first Indian satellite launched in April 1975 • Ten satellites before IRS-1A (7 for EO; 2 Met) • 5 Procured & 5 SLV / ASLV launch SAMIR : 3 band MW Radiometer SROSS : Stretched Rohini Series Satellite IndianIndian RemoteRemote SensingSensing SatelliteSatellite (IRS)(IRS) –– 1A1A • First Operational EO Application satellite, built in India, launch USSR • Carried 4-band multispectral camera (3 nos), 72m & 36m resolution Satellite Launch: March 17, 1988 Baikanur Cosmodrome Kazakhstan SinceSince IRSIRS --1A1A • Established of operational EO activities for – EO data acquisition, processing & archival – Applications & institutionalization – Public services in resource & disaster management – PSLV Launch Program to support EO missions – International partnership, cooperation & global data sets EarlyEarly IRSIRS MultispectralMultispectral SensorsSensors • 1st Generation : IRS-1A, IRS-1B •
    [Show full text]
  • The Space-Based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010)
    WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing For more information, please contact: System in 2010 (GOS-2010) World Meteorological Organization 7 bis, avenue de la Paix – P.O. Box 2300 – CH 1211 Geneva 2 – Switzerland www.wmo.int WMO Space Programme Office Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 85 19 – Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 84 74 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.wmo.int/pages/prog/sat/ WMO-TD No. 1513 WMO Space Programme SP-7 The Space-based Global Observing System in 2010 (GOS-2010) WMO/TD-No. 1513 2010 © World Meteorological Organization, 2010 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate these publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0)22 730 84 03 P.O. Box No. 2300 Fax: +41 (0)22 730 80 40 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] FOREWORD The launching of the world's first artificial satellite on 4 October 1957 ushered a new era of unprecedented scientific and technological achievements. And it was indeed a fortunate coincidence that the ninth session of the WMO Executive Committee – known today as the WMO Executive Council (EC) – was in progress precisely at this moment, for the EC members were very quick to realize that satellite technology held the promise to expand the volume of meteorological data and to fill the notable gaps where land-based observations were not readily available.
    [Show full text]
  • Accuracy, Precision, and Performance of Satellite Telemetry for Monitoring Wolf Movements Within Each Category
    Accuracy, Precision, and Pedormance of Satellite Telemetry for Monitoring Wolf Movements • Warren B. Ballard, Daniel J. Reed, Steven G. Fancy, and Paul R. Krausman We placed 23 satellite platform transmitter terminals (1.08-I.22 kg) on wolves in northwest Alaska during I987 through I99I. Male and female wolves aged I 0 months to eight years were monitored with no apparent adverse effects on them. We obtained 3 ,80I relocations from the 23 transmitters, an average of 29 relocations/month from each. Transmitters were programmed to operate four to six hours every two days and had a mean life span (including days before and after use on a wolf) of253 days (range= 67-482 days). Average life span while attached to wolves was I8I days (range= 50-366 days). Accuracy of I ,885 relocations at seven known sites varied among transmitters and averaged 336 and 728 mfor best and low quality relocations, respectively. The estimated locations from several transmitters were biased toward south and west directions. Costs (I992) per satellite relocation averaged about $44 U.S., in comparison to about $I66 with conventional telemetry methods using fixed-wing aircraft. Satellite telemetry has great potential for providing improved data sets for evaluation ofwolfterritory sizes and movements, but currently lacks accuracy and precision for detailed habitat or landscape use assessments. Introduction three reports provided evaluations of the systems after 1987 when Service Argos made improvements in calculating lo­ Satellite telemetry has become a widely accepted tool for cations and quality indices (Keating et al. 1991). Ofthe latter studying movements oflarge mammals and birds (Fancy et three studies, only Keating et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of the Wavefront Sensor Unit of ARGOS, the LBT Laser Guide Star System
    UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI FIRENZE Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Scuola di Dottorato in Astronomia Ciclo XXIV - FIS05 Design of the wavefront sensor unit of ARGOS, the LBT laser guide star system Candidato: Marco Bonaglia arXiv:1203.5081v1 [astro-ph.IM] 22 Mar 2012 Tutore: Prof. Alberto Righini Cotutore: Dott. Simone Esposito A common use for a glass plate is as a beam splitter, tilted at an angle of 45◦ [:::] Since this can severely degrade the image, such plate beam splitters are not recommended in convergent or divergent beams. W. J. Smith, Modern Optical Engineering. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Large Binocular Telescope . 2 1.2 LUCI . 4 1.3 First Light AO system . 5 1.3.1 Angular anisoplanatism . 8 1.4 Wide field AO correction . 9 1.5 Laser guide star AO . 10 1.5.1 Limits of LGS AO . 11 1.5.2 Rayleigh LGS . 13 1.6 LGS-GLAO facilities . 14 1.6.1 GLAS . 15 1.6.2 The MMT GLAO system . 15 1.6.3 SAM . 18 2 ARGOS: a laser guide star AO system for the LBT 21 2.1 System design . 22 2.2 Study of ARGOS performance . 29 2.2.1 The simulation code . 30 2.2.2 Results of ARGOS end-to-end simulations . 36 3 The wavefront sensor dichroic 43 3.1 Effects of a window in a convergent beam . 43 3.2 Aberration compensation with window shape . 47 3.2.1 Effects of a wedge between surfaces . 48 3.2.2 Effects of a cylindrical surface .
    [Show full text]
  • The Rings and Inner Moons of Uranus and Neptune: Recent Advances and Open Questions
    Workshop on the Study of the Ice Giant Planets (2014) 2031.pdf THE RINGS AND INNER MOONS OF URANUS AND NEPTUNE: RECENT ADVANCES AND OPEN QUESTIONS. Mark R. Showalter1, 1SETI Institute (189 Bernardo Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, mshowal- [email protected]! ). The legacy of the Voyager mission still dominates patterns or “modes” seem to require ongoing perturba- our knowledge of the Uranus and Neptune ring-moon tions. It has long been hypothesized that numerous systems. That legacy includes the first clear images of small, unseen ring-moons are responsible, just as the nine narrow, dense Uranian rings and of the ring- Ophelia and Cordelia “shepherd” ring ε. However, arcs of Neptune. Voyager’s cameras also first revealed none of the missing moons were seen by Voyager, sug- eleven small, inner moons at Uranus and six at Nep- gesting that they must be quite small. Furthermore, the tune. The interplay between these rings and moons absence of moons in most of the gaps of Saturn’s rings, continues to raise fundamental dynamical questions; after a decade-long search by Cassini’s cameras, sug- each moon and each ring contributes a piece of the gests that confinement mechanisms other than shep- story of how these systems formed and evolved. herding might be viable. However, the details of these Nevertheless, Earth-based observations have pro- processes are unknown. vided and continue to provide invaluable new insights The outermost µ ring of Uranus shares its orbit into the behavior of these systems. Our most detailed with the tiny moon Mab. Keck and Hubble images knowledge of the rings’ geometry has come from spanning the visual and near-infrared reveal that this Earth-based stellar occultations; one fortuitous stellar ring is distinctly blue, unlike any other ring in the solar alignment revealed the moon Larissa well before Voy- system except one—Saturn’s E ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the 50Th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO)
    Abstracts of the 50th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO) American Astronomical Society June, 2019 100 — Dynamics on Asteroids break-up event around a Lagrange point. 100.01 — Simulations of a Synthetic Eurybates 100.02 — High-Fidelity Testing of Binary Asteroid Collisional Family Formation with Applications to 1999 KW4 Timothy Holt1; David Nesvorny2; Jonathan Horner1; Alex B. Davis1; Daniel Scheeres1 Rachel King1; Brad Carter1; Leigh Brookshaw1 1 Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder 1 Centre for Astrophysics, University of Southern Queensland (Boulder, Colorado, United States) (Longmont, Colorado, United States) 2 Southwest Research Institute (Boulder, Connecticut, United The commonly accepted formation process for asym- States) metric binary asteroids is the spin up and eventual fission of rubble pile asteroids as proposed by Walsh, Of the six recognized collisional families in the Jo- Richardson and Michel (Walsh et al., Nature 2008) vian Trojan swarms, the Eurybates family is the and Scheeres (Scheeres, Icarus 2007). In this theory largest, with over 200 recognized members. Located a rubble pile asteroid is spun up by YORP until it around the Jovian L4 Lagrange point, librations of reaches a critical spin rate and experiences a mass the members make this family an interesting study shedding event forming a close, low-eccentricity in orbital dynamics. The Jovian Trojans are thought satellite. Further work by Jacobson and Scheeres to have been captured during an early period of in- used a planar, two-ellipsoid model to analyze the stability in the Solar system. The parent body of the evolutionary pathways of such a formation event family, 3548 Eurybates is one of the targets for the from the moment the bodies initially fission (Jacob- LUCY spacecraft, and our work will provide a dy- son and Scheeres, Icarus 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • + Return to Flight Implementation Plan -- 12Th Edition (8.4 Mb PDF)
    NASA’s Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond A periodically updated document demonstrating our progress toward safe return to flight and implementation of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board recommendations June 20, 2006 Volume 1, Twelfth Edition An electronic version of this implementation plan is available at www.nasa.gov NASA’s Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond June 20, 2006 Twelfth Edition Change June 20, 2006 This 12th revision to NASA’s Implementation Plan for Space Shuttle Return to Flight and Beyond provides updates to three Columbia Accident Investigation Board Recommendations that were not fully closed by the Return to Flight Task Group, R3.2-1 External Tank (ET), R6.4-1 Thermal Protection System (TPS) On-Orbit Inspection and Repair, and R3.3-2 Orbiter Hardening and TPS Impact Tolerance. These updates reflect the latest status of work being done in preparation for the STS-121 mission. Following is a list of sections updated by this revision: Message from Dr. Michael Griffin Message from Mr. William Gerstenmaier Part 1 – NASA’s Response to the Columbia Accident Investigation Board’s Recommendations 3.2-1 External Tank Thermal Protection System Modifications (RTF) 3.3-2 Orbiter Hardening (RTF) 6.4-1 Thermal Protection System On-Orbit Inspect and Repair (RTF) Remove Pages Replace with Pages Cover (Feb 17, 2006) Cover (Jun. 20, 2006 ) Title page (Feb 17, 2006) Title page (Jun. 20, 2006) Message From Michael D. Griffin Message From Michael D. Griffin (Feb 17, 2006)
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Telemetry and Bird Movements
    95 Chapter 7 Radio telemetry and bird movements RADIO TELEMETRY Understanding the role that wildlife play in the ecology of AI viruses requires knowledge of the detailed movements of wild birds over varying spatial scales. On the one hand, con- currence between the migratory patterns of some Palearctic breeding waterbirds and the spread of the H5N1 HPAI virus across Asia and Europe in the northern fall and winter of 2005/06 illustrates the importance of studies designed to identify specific migratory routes, stopover points and non-breeding areas that may span entire continents. On the other hand, studies documenting the local movements of wild birds between poultry farms and nearby wetlands may be invaluable to establish viable pathways of H5N1 HPAI transmission from poultry to wildlife (or vice versa). Radio telemetry is a technique for determining bird movements over areas ranging in size from the restricted breeding territories of resident bird species to the movement pat- terns of international migratory species (reviewed in Fuller et al. 2005). Radio telemetry has important applications in the investigation of infectious diseases of migratory species, including H5N1 AI virus ecology. Specific objectives for AI-related telemetry studies have already been identified during the FAO-OIE International Scientific Conference on Avian Influenza and Wild Birds in May 200610. In fact, telemetry projects tracking the local move- ments and migration routes of wild birds identified as potential virus hosts are already under way11. The basic concept of a radio telemetry study sounds simple; attach a radio transmitter to an animal and track the signal to determine the animal’s movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstration of Satellite/GPS Telemetry for Monitoring Fine- Scale Movements of Lesser Prairie-Chickens
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service National Technology & Demonstration of Development Program Inventory and Monitoring 1219 1813—SDTDC Satellite/GPS Telemetry December 2012 for Monitoring Fine- Scale Movements of Lesser Prairie-Chickens Demonstration of Satellite/GPS Telemetry for Monitoring Fine-Scale Movements of Lesser Prairie-Chickens Rey Farve, Project Leader Forest Service San Dimas Technology & Development Center December 2012 The information contained in this publication has been developed for the guidance of employees of the Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, its contractors, and cooperating Federal and State agencies. The Forest Service assumes no responsibility for the interpretation or use of this information by other than its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official evaluation, conclusion, recommendation, endorsement, or approval of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Finds Neptune Moons Locked in 'Dance of Avoidance' 15 November 2019, by Gretchen Mccartney
    NASA finds Neptune moons locked in 'dance of avoidance' 15 November 2019, by Gretchen McCartney Although the dance may appear odd, it keeps the orbits stable, researchers said. "We refer to this repeating pattern as a resonance," said Marina Brozovi?, an expert in solar system dynamics at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, and the lead author of the new paper, which was published Nov. 13 in Icarus. "There are many different types of 'dances' that planets, moons and asteroids can follow, but this one has never been seen before." Far from the pull of the Sun, the giant planets of the Neptune Moon Dance: This animation illustrates how the outer solar system are the dominant sources of odd orbits of Neptune's inner moons Naiad and gravity, and collectively, they boast dozens upon Thalassa enable them to avoid each other as they race dozens of moons. Some of those moons formed around the planet. Credit: NASA alongside their planets and never went anywhere; others were captured later, then locked into orbits dictated by their planets. Some orbit in the opposite direction their planets rotate; others swap orbits Even by the wild standards of the outer solar with each other as if to avoid collision. system, the strange orbits that carry Neptune's two innermost moons are unprecedented, according to Neptune has 14 confirmed moons. Neso, the newly published research. farthest-flung of them, orbits in a wildly elliptical loop that carries it nearly 46 million miles (74 million Orbital dynamics experts are calling it a "dance of kilometers) away from the planet and takes 27 avoidance" performed by the tiny moons Naiad years to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Filipiak Solar System Book
    Our Solar System Mrs. Filipiak’s Class Our Solar System Mrs. Filipiak’s Class Sun ...............................................................................................7 Michael ........................................................................................7 Mercury ........................................................................................1 Denzel ..........................................................................................1 Mercury ........................................................................................3 Austin ...........................................................................................3 Mercury ........................................................................................5 Madison B ....................................................................................5 Venus ............................................................................................7 Shyla .............................................................................................7 Venus ............................................................................................9 Kenny ...........................................................................................9 Earth ..........................................................................................11 Kaleb ..........................................................................................11 Earth ..........................................................................................13
    [Show full text]