DOCSLIB.ORG

Witj a Section on Polychaetes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Witj a Section on Polychaetes RsRDir. Skr. Ser. r-lavUnders. 14(5):229-556 A Quantitative Study in Puget Sound, WASHINGTON, USA, IN 1963-1964 BY ULF LIE Department of Oceanography, University of Washington, SeattZe, Washington, USA With a section on polychaetes by KARL BANSE, KATHARINE D. HOBSON AND FREDERIC H. NICHOLS UNIVERSITETSFORLAGET 0 The Norv,egian Research Cou~lcilfor Scietlce and the Huinailities 1965 (Norges almenvitenskapelige forskningsrid) Section: D. 69. C0-3Y. Printed ill Norway by UNIVERSITETSFORLAGETS TRYKNINGSSENTRAI OSLO, NORWAY CONTENTS A . Purpose of the present investigation ...................... 237 B . Literature review ...................................... 237 1. Review of concepts and methods .................... 237 2 . Subtidal investigations from the west coast of the United States .................................. 239 C . Area and environment .......................... ........ 241 1. Topography and sedimentology ...................... 241 2 . Hydrography ...................................... 241 3. Phytoplankton production ........................... 244 MATERLAL AND METHODS ............................... 245 A . Choice of stations ...................................... 245 B . Description of stations .................................. 245 Station 1 (47°41'33"~. 122~24'18"~)................ 247 Station 2 ($7°42q16"~. 122~26'24"~) ................ 247 Station 3 (49°44'044"~. 12~~31'53s'~) ................ 247 Station 4 (47°44131q'~.122~32'41"~) ................ 247 Station 5 (47*10'48"~. ~22~50'00"~)................ 247 Station 6 (47°10'40"~. 122~48'48"~)................ 247 Station 9 (47°13'30"~. 122'49'36"~) ................ 248 Station 8 (41°15'10"~7 1220 50'06"W) ................ 248 C . Choice of sampler and sampling procedures ............... 248 D . Number of samples .................................... 249 E . Sieving ......................................... 253 8" . Laboratorymethods ................................... 253 f . Sediment particle size analysis .................... 253 2 . Sorting and identification of fauna .................. 253 3 . Size measurements and weighings .................. 254 4 . Electronic data processing ......................... 255 III . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .............................. 256 2 A . Performance of the 0.1 ni van Veen grab ............... 256 1. Repeatability ..................................... 256 2 . Sampling efficiency ............................... 261 3 . Comparison of the van Veen and the Smith- McIntyre grabs .................................. 262 B . The substrate at the stations ........................... 263 C . Composition of the faunal assemblages .................. 271 Station 1 (Tables 5 and 6) .......................... Station 2 (Tables 7 and 8) .......................... Station 3 (Tables 9 and 10) ......................... Station 4 (Tables 11 and 12) ........................ Station 5 (Tables 13 and 14) ........................ Station 6 (Tables 15 and 16) ........................ Station 7 (Tables 17 and 18) ........................ Station 8 (Tables 19 and 20) ........................ D . Number of species and specimens ...................... 324 1. Seasonal variatioils it1 numbers .................... 324 2 . Distribution of taxoiloniic groups in relation to sediments ..................................... 335 3 . Patchiness of ~lumericallydominant species ......... 335 E . Standing crop .........................................339 1. Standing crop of benthic infauna .................... 339 2 . Seasonal variation in standing crop ................. 341 F . Similarity among the faunal assemblages ................. 345 6 . Relationships between the faunal assemblages in Puget Sound and known benthic communities .............. 350 H . Diversity .............................................. 351 1. Indices of diversity as measurable parameters of communities .................................... 351 2 . MARGALEFts index of diversity ..................... 352 3 . The SEANNON-WIENER function as an index of diversity ....................................... 354 4 . Redundancy ....................................... 358 5 . Comparisons of indices of diversity .................. 360 6 . Indices of diversity with polychaetes included ......... 363 IV . THE NUMERICALLY DOMINANT SPECIES ................. 367 A . Selection of dominant species ........................... 367 B . Biological and ecological information about the nunlerically dominant species ........................... 368 Harmothoe imbricata (LINNB) ...................... 368 Lepidasthenia berkeleyae PETTIBONE ............... 368 Malmgrenia lunulata (DELLE CEIAJE) .............. 370 Peisidice aspera JOHNSON ......................... 370 Pholoe minuta (FABRICIUS) ........................ 372 Sigambra tentaculata (TREADWELL) ................ 372 Pionosyllis uraga IMAJIMA ........................ 372 Platynereis bicanaliculata (BAIRD) .................. 374 Nephtys ferruginea !&ARTMAN ...................... 374 Glycera capitata OERSTED ........................ 376 Lumbrineris bicirrata TREADWELL ................ 376 Lumbrineris californiensis HARTMAN .............. 378 Lumbrineris cruzensis HARTMAN .................. 378 Lumbrineris luti BERKELEY and BERKELEY ....... 380 Haploscoloplos pugettensis PETTIBONE ............. 380 Laonice cirrata (SARS) ............................ 382 Laonice sp. I ..................................... 382 Prionospio cirrifera WIR~N........................ 382 19 . Prionospio malmgreni CEAPAR~DE ................ 385 20 . Prionospio pinnata ENLERS ....................... 385 21 . Caulleriella alata (SOUTHERN) ..................... 387 22 . Chaetozone setosa MALMGREN ..................... 387 23 . Chaetozone sp. I ................................... 387 24 . Armandia brevis (MOORE) ......................... 389 25 . Travisia pupa MOORE ............................. 389 26 . Euclymene zonalis (VERRILL) ...................... 389 27 . Praxillella affinis pacifica BERKELEY .............. 392 28 . Praxillella gracilis (SARS) ......................... 392 29 . Pectinaria californiensis HARTMAN ................ 392 30 . Pectinaria granulata (LINN~)....................... 394 31 . Golfingia pugettensis FISHER ....................... 394 32 . Euphilomedes carcharodonta (V . Z . SMITH) .......... 397 33 . Euphilomedes producta POULSEN ................... 401 34 . Paraphoxus variatus BARNARD ..................... 404 35 . Heterophoxus oculatus (HOLMES) ................... 408 36 . Byblis veleronis BARNARD ......................... 408 37 . Leptochelia dubia (KROYER) ....................... 417 38 . Eudorella pacifica HART .......................... 421 39 . Pinnixa schmitti RATHBUN ........................ 422 40 . Lophopanopeus bellus (STIMPSON) .................. 431 41 . Nucula bellotii ADAMS ........................,. .. 438 42 . Crenella columbiana DALL ......................... 442 43 . Psephidia lordi BAIRD ............................. 446 44 . Mysella tumida (CARPENTER) ...................... 451 45 . Axinopsida sericata CARPENTER ................... 456 46 . Macoma carlottensis (WHITEAVES) .................. 461 47 . Macoma alaskana DALL ........................... 466 48 . Macoma calcarea GMELIN ......................... 466 49 . Semele rubropicta DALL ........................... 469 50 . Myaarenaria LINN~ .............................. 475 51 . Amphiodia urtica (LYMAN) ......................... 479 52 . Leptosynapta clarki HEDING ........................ 489 53 . Brisaster townsendi PGASSIZ ....................... 490 V . SUMMARY ............................................... 498 VI . ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................... 501 VII . REFERENCES ............................................ 503 VIII . APPENDIX I . "MISCELLANEOUS GROUPS" ................ 518 M . APPENDIX II . ANNOTATED LIST OF POLYCHAETES BY KARL BANSE. KATHARINE D . HOBSON AND FREDERIC H . NICHOLS ............................................. 521 X . TAXONOMIC LISTING OF NONPOLYCHAETES .............. 549 I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the present investigation In 1962 the Department of Oceanography, University of Washington, planned to start benthic investigations in the Northeast Pacific Ocean, but as the Depart- ment was inexperienced in the field of benthos research it was felt that a pilot study in Puget Sound would be necessary. The pilot study would be particularly concerned with sampling problems, processing of material, and spatial and sea- sonal variability. Methods and concepts of modern synecology, such as statisti- cal methods for delimiting communities and the concept of species diversity, have received little attention from benthos researchers, and one of the objec- tives therefore has been to test the validity and applicability of some of these methods. It was realized that future studies of the dynamics of productivity and energetics of benthic communities would have to be limited to the dominant spe- cies population. One of the objectives of the present investigation therefore has been to determine which species are the most important and to compile ecologi- cal and biological information about those species. B. Literature review 1. Review of concepts and methods A truly quantitative study of the bottom fauna is a product of this century, and is mainly attributed to the invention of a quantitative sampler, the Petersen grab (PETERSEN and JENSEN 1911). The advantage of grabs over the dredges that had been used in the last century is that they enable the scientist
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Base Line Monitoring for Salmon Farming Site in Eyrarhlíð, Dyrafjörður
    Base line monitoring for salmon farming site in Eyrarhlíð, Dyrafjörður Worked for Arctic Sea Farm Cristian Gallo July 2019 NV nr. 13-19 Náttúrustofa Vestfjarða Sími: 456-7005 Kennitala: 610397-2209 Aðalstræti 12 Netfang: [email protected] 415 Bolungarvík Heimasíða: http://www.nave.is Base line monitoring Eyrarhlíð, Dyrafjörður CG NV nr. 13-19 Date month/year: July 2019 Distribution: Open Report nr: Work number: Close until: NV nr. 13-19 516 With permission of the client Title: Number pages: 19 Base line monitoring for salmon farming site in Number of figures: 4 Number of tables: 8 Eyrarhlíð, Dyrafjörður Author: Cristian Gallo Number appendixces: 2 Sampling date: 5.6.2018 Client´s contact: Steinunn Guðný Einarsdóttir Site: Eyrarhlíð (Dýrafjördur) Worked for: Arctic Sea Farm hf. Dýrafirði Operative licence: 2.000 ton Sveitarfélaginu Ísafirði Lögheimili Suðurgötu 12, Ísafirði Kt.: 700807-0450 Abstract: Base line monitoring was conducted at mariculture site in Eyrarhlíð according to ISO12878 standard. Sea bottom was found muddy with high similarity in animal community between stations. Animal community found at Eyrarhlíð was predominantly made of common species found in fjord ecosystems in the Westfjords. Polychaetes were the predominant species with Levinsenia gracilis most abundant and good presence of species from the Maldanidae family (Euchone sp. and Galathowenia oculata). Shannon-Wiener diversity index (loge) resulted under 3 for all stations. AMBI classified the site as slightly disturbed. Considering farming was never done in proximity to this site we assume other natural conditions affect the diversity in this area. Visual and chemical parameters did not show any signs of organic impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL 109 WMhington : 1959 No. 3412 MARINE MOLLUSCA OF POINT BARROW, ALASKA Bv Nettie MacGinitie Introduction The material upon which this study is based was collected by G. E. MacGinitie in the vicinity of Point Barrow, Alaska. His work on the invertebrates of the region (see G. E. MacGinitie, 1955j was spon- sored by contracts (N6-0NR 243-16) between the OfRce of Naval Research and the California Institute of Technology (1948) and The Johns Hopkins L^niversity (1949-1950). The writer, who served as research associate under this project, spent the. periods from July 10 to Oct. 10, 1948, and from June 1949 to August 1950 at the Arctic Research Laboratory, which is located at Point Barrow base at ap- proximately long. 156°41' W. and lat. 71°20' N. As the northernmost point in Alaska, and representing as it does a point about midway between the waters of northwest Greenland and the Kara Sea, where collections of polar fauna have been made. Point Barrow should be of particular interest to students of Arctic forms. Although the dredge hauls made during the collection of these speci- mens number in the hundreds and, compared with most "expedition standards," would be called fairly intensive, the area of the ocean ' Kerckhofl Marine Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. 473771—59 1 59 — 60 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. los bottom touched by the dredge is actually small in comparison with the total area involved in the investigation. Such dredge hauls can yield nothing comparable to what can be obtained from a mudflat at low tide, for instance.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATISE ONLINE Number 48
    TREATISE ONLINE Number 48 Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 31: Illustrated Glossary of the Bivalvia Joseph G. Carter, Peter J. Harries, Nikolaus Malchus, André F. Sartori, Laurie C. Anderson, Rüdiger Bieler, Arthur E. Bogan, Eugene V. Coan, John C. W. Cope, Simon M. Cragg, José R. García-March, Jørgen Hylleberg, Patricia Kelley, Karl Kleemann, Jiří Kříž, Christopher McRoberts, Paula M. Mikkelsen, John Pojeta, Jr., Peter W. Skelton, Ilya Tëmkin, Thomas Yancey, and Alexandra Zieritz 2012 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 2153-4012 (online) paleo.ku.edu/treatiseonline PART N, REVISED, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 31: ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY OF THE BIVALVIA JOSEPH G. CARTER,1 PETER J. HARRIES,2 NIKOLAUS MALCHUS,3 ANDRÉ F. SARTORI,4 LAURIE C. ANDERSON,5 RÜDIGER BIELER,6 ARTHUR E. BOGAN,7 EUGENE V. COAN,8 JOHN C. W. COPE,9 SIMON M. CRAgg,10 JOSÉ R. GARCÍA-MARCH,11 JØRGEN HYLLEBERG,12 PATRICIA KELLEY,13 KARL KLEEMAnn,14 JIřÍ KřÍž,15 CHRISTOPHER MCROBERTS,16 PAULA M. MIKKELSEN,17 JOHN POJETA, JR.,18 PETER W. SKELTON,19 ILYA TËMKIN,20 THOMAS YAncEY,21 and ALEXANDRA ZIERITZ22 [1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA, [email protected]; 2University of South Florida, Tampa, USA, [email protected], [email protected]; 3Institut Català de Paleontologia (ICP), Catalunya, Spain, [email protected], [email protected]; 4Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 5South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, [email protected]; 6Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 7North
    [Show full text]
  • List of Bivalvia of British Columbia Compiled by R
    List of Bivalvia of British Columbia Compiled by R. Forsyth. Last revised 1 January 2013 The higher classification utilized here follows Bieler et al. (2010). Marine species are mostly derived from Coan et al. (2000), and freshwater species from Clarke (1981). Changes to names to species or additions to the fauna since these two publications are noted. Marine groups are in black type, freshwater taxa are in blue, and introduced species are marked with an asterisk (*). Class Bivalvia Subclass Protobranchia Order Nuculida Superfamily Nuculoidea Family Nuculidae Genus Nucula Subgenus Lamellinucula Nucula carlottensis Dall, 1897 Genus Acila Subgenus Truncacila Acila castrensis (Hinds, 1843) Genus Ennucula Ennucula linki (Dall, 1916) Ennucula tenuis (Montagu, 1808) Family Sareptidae Subfamily Sareptinae Genus Setigloma Setigloma japonica (E.A. Smith, 1885) Subfamily Pristiglominae Genus Pristigloma Pristigloma nitens (Jeffreys, 1876) Order Solemyida Superfamily Solemyoidea Family Solemyidae Genus Solemya Subgenus Petrasma Solemya pervernicosa Kuroda, 1948 1 Genus Acharax Acharax johnsoni (Dall, 1891) Order Nuculanida 1 Solemya reidi F.R. Bernard, 1980, is a synonym of S. pervernicosa, which belongs to the subgenus Petrasma (Kamenev 2009). Superfamily Nuculanoidea Family Nuculanidae Subfamily Nuculaninae Genus Nuculana Subgenus Nuculana Nuculana extenuata (Dall, 1897) Nuculana hamata (Carpenter, 1864) Nuculana leonina (Dall, 1896) Nuculana minuta (Müller, 1776) Nuculana navisa (Dall, 1916) Nuculana pernula (Müller, 1779) Subgenus Jupiteria
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • By J. A. Allen Zoology Department, the University, Glasgow, and the Marine Station, Millport
    J. Mar. biol.Ass. U.K. (I954) 33, 457-472 457 Printed in Great Britain A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE BRITISH SPECIES OF NUCULA AND NUCULANA By J. A. Allen Zoology Department, The University, Glasgow, and the Marine Station, Millport (Plate I and Text-figs. 1-8) The survey of the sublittoral fauna of the Clyde Sea Area from 1949 onwards has shown that five species of the Protobranchiata are abundant throughout this region on a variety of substrata. Pelseneer (1891, 1899, 1911), Heath (1937), and Yonge (1939) have contributed much to the knowledge of the group as a whole, but little comparative work has been done at species level. Verrill & Bush (1897, 1898) studied the shell characters of the American Atlantic species. Moore (193Ia, b) worked on the faecal pellets of the British Nuculidae and attempted to distinguish the species by this means~ while Winckworth (1930,1931), mainly in the light of the latter work, attempted to clarify the nomenclature of these species. Winckworth (1932) lists six British species of the family Nuculidae: Nucula sulcata Bronn, N. nudeus (Linne), N. hanleyi Winckworth, N. turgida Leckenby & Marshall, N. moorei Winck- 'Worth and N. tenuis (Montagu); and four species of the family Nuculanidae: Nuculana minuta (Muller), Yoldiella lucida (Loven), Y. tomlini Winckworth !lD.dPhaseolus pusillus (Jeffreys). All species of Nucula, except N. hanleyi, were taken from the Clyde Sea Area, although the latter species is included in the Clyde fauna list (Scott Elliot, Laurie & Murdoch, 1901). Only Nuculana minuta of the Nuculanidae has been taken on the present survey. Yoldiella tomlini is included in the 19°1 list but is noted as being' insufficiently attested'.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating a Potential Relict Arctic Invertebrate and Algal Community on the West Side of Cook Inlet
    Evaluating a Potential Relict Arctic Invertebrate and Algal Community on the West Side of Cook Inlet Nora R. Foster Principal Investigator Additional Researchers: Dennis Lees Sandra C. Lindstrom Sue Saupe Final Report OCS Study MMS 2010-005 November 2010 This study was funded in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) through Cooperative Agreement No. 1435-01-02-CA-85294, Task Order No. 37357, between BOEMRE, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region, and the University of Alaska Fairbanks. This report, OCS Study MMS 2010-005, is available from the Coastal Marine Institute (CMI), School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220. Electronic copies can be downloaded from the MMS website at www.mms.gov/alaska/ref/akpubs.htm. Hard copies are available free of charge, as long as the supply lasts, from the above address. Requests may be placed with Ms. Sharice Walker, CMI, by phone (907) 474-7208, by fax (907) 474-7204, or by email at [email protected]. Once the limited supply is gone, copies will be available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161, or may be inspected at selected Federal Depository Libraries. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. Evaluating a Potential Relict Arctic Invertebrate and Algal Community on the West Side of Cook Inlet Nora R.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Molluscs and Other Megafossils
    120 PLEISTOCENE/HOLOCENE BOUNDARY E. OLAUSSON ED. ( ) 12. MOLLUSCS AND OTHER MEGAFOSSILS ROLF W. FEYLING-HANSSEN Department of Micropalaeontology, Geological Institute, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark INTRODUCTION Molluscs are an excellent too! in the stratigraphical evaluation of outcrops and cleared seetians where they can be sampied in reasonable quantities, bu t not in thin cores where the y, as other megafossils, are on ly casually and incompletely represented. Molluscs are so rare in the investigated cores that they should only be used with eautian for biostratigraphical purposes in the present stud y. The samples investigated represent half slices of the care. Most of them are 10 cm, same are 20 cm and some are less than 10 cm thick. The dry weight of the samples varies from 20 g to 90 g. Out of 76 examined samples of the Solberga care, only 43 contained fragments or valves of molluscs. The valves are rare and the fragments are usually small. Of 45 examined samples of the Brastad care, 26 contained valves or fragments of molluscs. On the other hand, only 2 of the examined samples of the Moltemyr care were completely barren, but many mollusc fragments of this care were reworked. It has been possible to group the occurring species into four zoogeo­ 12:1 , graphical units (Fig. ) viz. , High-Arctic: these are mainly limited to the present day High-Arctic region; Arctic-Boreal: Arctic species which may also occur in the Boreal region; Boreal-Arctic: Boreal species which may also occur in the Arctic region; Boreal: species which are limited to the Boreal region, or which are Boreal-Lusitanian in their distribution (for definition of these terms see Antevs 1928, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Contributions
    Paleontological Contributions Number 12 The paracladistic approach to phylogenetic taxonomy Joseph G. Carter, Cristian R. Altaba, Laurie C. Anderson, David C. Campbell, Zongjie Fang, Peter J. Harries, and Peter W. Skelton April 30, 2015 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 1946-0279 (online) paleo.ku.edu/contributions Cover illustration: evolutionary hypothesis for the crown group families of superfamily Nuculanoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) compatible with paleontological, anatomical, and molecular data. Exclamation mark (!) indicates that Nuculanidae is paraphyletic. Paleontological Contributions April 30, 2015 Number 12 THE PARACLADISTIC APPROACH TO PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY Joseph G. Carter1*, Cristian R. Altaba2, Laurie C. Anderson3, David C. Campbell4, Zongjie Fang5, Peter J. Harries6, and Peter W. Skelton7 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3315, USA, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Human Evolution and Cognition Group (EVOCOG), Universitat de les Illes Balears, 07122, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain, e-mail: cris- [email protected]; 3South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701-3901, USA, e-mail: Laurie.Anderson@sdsmt. edu; 4Gardner-Webb University, Boiling Springs, NC 28017, USA, e-mail: [email protected]; 5 State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, People’s Republic of China, e-mail: [email protected]; 6School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, NES107,
    [Show full text]
  • Двустворчатые Моллюски (Mollusca, Bivalvia) Дальневосточного Морского Заповедника Е
    2015. №1 Двустворчатые моллюски (Mollusca, Bivalvia) Дальневосточного морского заповедника Е. Б. Лебедев Дальневосточный морской заповедник, 690041, г. Владивосток, ул. Пальчевского, 17 E-mail: [email protected] Аннотация Представлен уточнённый аннотированный список 114 видов двустворчатых моллюсков (Mollusca, Bivalvia) Дальневосточного морского заповедника (залив Петра Великого, Японское море). Для каждого вида приведены современные сведения по их таксономии и распространению, указаны районы, грунты и глубины находок в заповеднике. Ключевые слова: двустворчатые моллюски, морской заповедник, грунт, глубина. Bivalve Mollusks (Mollusca, Bivalvia) of the Far Eastern Marine Reserve (Russia, Sea of Japan) E. B. Lebedev Far Eastern Marine Reserve, Palchevskogo Street, 17, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Summary An annotated list of 114 species of bivalve mollusks (Mollusca, Bivalvia) from the Far Eastern Marine Reserve, Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan, is presented. For each species the contemporary data on taxonomy and distribution are given. Additionally, data on bottom deposits and depths of mollusk’s finding are provided. Key words: bivalves, marine reserve, Sea of Japan, bottom deposits, depth. Представлен аннотированный список двустворчатых моллюсков Дальневосточного морского заповедника [23], который включает 114 видов из 73 родов, 35 семейств и 14 отрядов. Список Bivalvia составлен на основе исследований, выполненных в зал. Петра Великого в 1967-2014 гг. [1; 10; 13- 14; 18; 20], а также в ДВГМЗ в 1984-2004 гг. [2-3; 9; 12; 15-17] 32 Биота и среда заповедников Дальнего Востока = Biodiversity and Environment of Far East Reserves. 2015. №1 и в 2004-2014 гг. [4; 11; 23]. Дополнения к списку 2004 г. отмечены звёздочкой. Виды, занесённые в Красную книгу РФ или Приморского края, выделены двумя звёздочками.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Invasive Species and Biodiversity of South Central Alaska
    Marine Invasive Species and Biodiversity of South Central Alaska Anson H. Hines & Gregory M. Ruiz, Editors Smithsonian Environmental Research Center PO Box 28, 647 Contees Wharf Road Edgewater, Maryland 21037-0028 USA Telephone: 443. 482.2208 Fax: 443.482-2295 Email: [email protected], [email protected] Submitted to: Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council of Prince William Sound 3709 Spenard Road Anchorage, AK 99503 USA Telephone: 907.277-7222 Fax: 907.227.4523 154 Fairbanks Drive, PO Box 3089 Valdez, AK 99686 USA Telephone: 907835 Fax: 907.835.5926 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 43655 Kalifornski Beach Road, PO Box 167-0 Soldatna, AK 99661 Telephone: 907.262.9863 Fax: 907.262.7145 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background - Anson Hines & Gregory Ruiz 2. Green Crab (Carcinus maenas) Research – Gregory Ruiz, Anson Hines, Dani Lipski A. Larval Tolerance Experiments B. Green Crab Trapping Network 3. Fouling Community Studies – Gregory Ruiz, Anson Hines, Linda McCann, Kimberly Philips, George Smith 4. Taxonomic Field Surveys A. Motile Crustacea on Fouling Plates– Jeff Cordell B. Hydroids – Leanne Henry C. Pelagic Cnidaria and Ctenophora – Claudia Mills D. Anthozoa – Anson Hines & Nora Foster E. Bryozoans – Judith Winston F. Nemertineans – Jon Norenburg & Svetlana Maslakova G. Brachyura – Anson Hines H. Molluscs – Nora Foster I. Urochordates and Hemichordates – Sarah Cohen J. Echinoderms –Anson Hines & Nora Foster K. Wetland Plants - Dennis Whigham 2 Executive Summary This report summarizes research on nonindigenous species (NIS) in marine ecosystems of Alaska during the year 2000 by the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. The project is an extension of three years of research on NIS in Prince William Sound, which is presented in a major report (Hines and Ruiz, 2000) that is on line at the website of the Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council: www.pwsrcac.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Bivalvia: Protobranchia) from the Cerulli Irelli Collection (Mediterranean, Pleistocene
    Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 46 (2-3), 2007, 125-137. Modena, 15 gennaio 2008125 Revision of the Nuculanidae (Bivalvia: Protobranchia) from the Cerulli Irelli collection (Mediterranean, Pleistocene) Rafael LA PERNA R. La Perna, Dipartimento di Geologia e Geofisica, Università di Bari, Via Orabona 4, I-70125 Bari, Italy; [email protected] KEY WORDS - Nuculanidae, Saccella, Lembulus, Jupiteria, Early Pleistocene, Italy. ABSTRACT - The present work completes the revision of the Early Pleistocene (Calabrian) protobranchs from the shallow water deposits of Monte Mario and surrounding localities (Rome), present in the Cerulli Irelli collection. Additional material, mostly from the Bellardi & Sacco collection, was also studied in order to clarify the taxonomic status of some poorly known species described in the early literature. Three nuculanid genera are dealt with: Saccella Woodring, 1925, Lembulus Risso, 1826, and Jupiteria Bellardi, 1875. The Plio-Pleistocene species of Saccella have been often confused as a single, notably variable species, usually reported as Nuculana fragilis (Chemnitz, 1784) or N. commutata (Philippi, 1844). Four species of Saccella occurred in the Mediterranean Plio-Pleistocene: S. commutata (Philippi, 1844), S. consanguinea (Bellardi, 1875), S. bonellii (Bellardi, 1875) and S. calatabianensis (Seguenza, 1877). Of these, S. commutata and S. calatabianensis were present in the Early Pleistocene. Other Plio-Pleistocene species of Saccella are expected, basing on literature data and on available material. Lembulus included a single Plio-Pleistocene and extant species, L. pella (Linné, 1758). Jupiteria occurred in the Plio-Pleistocene with a single shallow water species, J. fissistriata (Foresti, 1897 ex Meneghini ms), but two other deep-water species are known: J.
    [Show full text]