Article 10 Application

Viewpoint 37b

Location Hudson River view west.

Distance 0.1 mile.

Town: Newburgh

County: Orange

Photo Date: 12-4-2018

0138

Viewpoint 37c

Location Hudson River view west.

Distance 0.1 mile.

Town: Newburgh

County: Orange

Photo Date: 12-4-2018

0127

Danskammer Energy Center Photolog, October 2018-October 2019 DANSKJ\MME' R. Viewpoint 37d

Location Hudson River view northwest.

Distance 0.1 mile.

Town: Newburgh

County: Orange

Photo Date: 12-4-2018

0129

Viewpoint 37e

Location Hudson River view west.

Distance 0.1 mile.

Town: Newburgh

County: Orange

Photo Date: 12-4-2018

0157

Danskammer Energy Center Photolog, October 2018-October 2019 DANSKJ\MME' R. Viewpoint 37f

Location Hudson River view west.

Distance 0.1 mile.

Town: Newburgh

County: Orange

Photo Date: 12-4-2018

0158

Viewpoint 38

Location Mount Beacon Overlook.

Distance 5.8 miles.

Town: Fishkill

County: Dutchess

Photo Date: 10-14-2109

Mt Beacon right

Danskammer Energy Center Photolog, October 2018-October 2019 DANSKJ\MME' R. DANSKAMMER ENERGY CENTER ARTICLE 10 EXHIBIT 24

PHOTOSIMULATIONS

ATTACHMENT 4 Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 622628.21 E NY State Plane East 998325.73 N Viewpoint Location Lawrence Farm Orchard Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 724 Distance to Proposed Stack 2.9 miles Direction of View E Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.11.19/10:18 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP2b - NEWBURGH EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 628556.44 E NY State Plane East 986810.57 N Viewpoint Location Strawberry Lane Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 205 Distance to Proposed Stack 2.8 Direction of View NE Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.11.19/11:58 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP7b - NEWBURGH EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 628556.44 E NY State Plane East 986810.57 N Viewpoint Location Strawberry Lane Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 205 Distance to Proposed Stack 2.8 Direction of View NE Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.11.19/11:58 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP7b – NEWBURGH – VIEW WITH PLUME PROPOSED CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 627583.78 E NY State Plane East 981572.78 N Viewpoint Location Commonwealth Ave Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 17.2 Distance to Proposed Stack 3.7 miles Direction of View NE Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.11.19/11:29 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER

VP8b - NEWBURGH EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

VP8b - NEWBURGH PROPOSED CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 627609.65 E NY State Plane East 970615.61 N Viewpoint Location Waterfront Trail Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 8.3 Distance to Proposed Stack 5.5 Direction of View N Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 10.25.18/1:40 pm Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP13 – CITY OF NEWBURGH EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

VP13 – CITY OF NEWBURGH PROPOSED CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 638369.42 E NY State Plane East 992651.54 N Viewpoint Location Chelsea Forest Products Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 10 Distance to Proposed Stack 1.0 mile Direction of View N Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 10.25.18/3:05 pm Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP23 – WAPPINGER EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 641124.76 E NY State Plane East 994276.57 N Viewpoint Location River Road North Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 116 Distance to Proposed Stack 0.9 Direction of View NW Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4/12/19/11:12 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER

VP25b – WAPPINGER EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

VP25b – WAPPINGER PROPOSED CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 643268.02 E NY State Plane East 1000821.88 N Viewpoint Location Old Troy Rd Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 7.3 Distance to Proposed Stack 1.1 Direction of View SW Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.12.19/11:48 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER

VP27b – WAPPINGER EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 644676.48 E NY State Plane East 1009242.91 N Viewpoint Location Bowdoin County Park Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 64.3 Distance to Proposed Stack 2.5 miles Direction of View SW Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.12.19/1:40 pm Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP32b – POUGHKEEPSIE EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 636859.31 E NY State Plane East 990485.7 N Viewpoint Location Old Castle Point Rd Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 16.5 Distance to Proposed Stack 1.4 miles Direction of View N Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 4.12.19/3:01 pm Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP35 – WAPPINGER EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

~ ..., • anskammer , .'XJl '"'IIJ.J' .p oin t .Q;' I .. I '

, I ~ I ./,

Viewpoint Coordinates in 638346.94 E NY State Plane East 997625.96 N Viewpoint Location Hudson River Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 42 Distance to Proposed Stack 0.1 mile Direction of View W Lens Setting 24 mm Date/Time 12.4.18/10:41 am Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP37 – NEWBURGH EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

Viewpoint Coordinates in 641844.3 NY State Plane East 967699.9 Viewpoint Location Mount Beacon Viewer Elevation (ft msl) 1194 Distance to Proposed Stack 5.8 miles Direction of View N Lens Setting 50 mm Date/Time 10.14.2019/12:16 pm Danskammer Energy Center Newburgh, New York Visual Simulation of Project October,~ 2019 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC VP38 – FISHKILL EXISTING CONDITIONS Viewpoint Location Aerial

Viewpoint Location Topo

PHOTOSIMULATION CONTRAST

RATING FORMS

ATTACHMENT 5 TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.5.19 Viewpoint Number: 2b Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: view Lawrence Farm Way Landscape Similarity Zone: Agricultural/Open Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☒ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0

Line Contrast 0

Texture Contrast 0

Color Contrast 0

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 0.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0

Total 0.5 Project can hardly be seen to provide contrasts on a scale

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 0

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1.5 Orchard use

Duration of View 1

Presence of Existing Development 0.5

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1 A typical sort of long distance view of ridges in the background

Presence of Water 0

Total 4

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 Pretty long distance look from an orchard * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/17/19 Viewpoint Number: 2b Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: view Lawrence Farm Way Landscape Similarity Zone: Agricultural/Open Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☒ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Line Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Texture Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Color Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken in this view.

Visual Acuity 0 No significant visual acuity can be discerned.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing efforts can be discerned.

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 Little to no Screening/Mitigation effort is needed.

Total 0

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 0 Although the proposed structure(s) are difficult to see from this vantage point, Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 it can be concluded that views throughout this region will be present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 2 that longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 2 Numerous man-made structures can be observed in this view.

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 This view is picturesque however, it seems fairly typical for this region.

Presence of Water 0 No water appears to be present.

Total 7.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 This view is picturesque in nature and pleasant to look at. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 2b Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: view Lawrence Farm Way Landscape Similarity Zone: Agricultural/Open Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☒ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0 Project not discernible

Line Contrast 0 Project not discernible

Texture Contrast 0 Project not discernible

Color Contrast 0 Project not discernible

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0 Project not discernible

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 0

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0

Total 0

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 0

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1 Rural road and few houses in the vicinity

Duration of View 2 Workers at farm would have day long view

Presence of Existing Development 2 Existing development seen throughout view

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 Typical of region

Presence of Water 0 No water visible

Total 6.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 7b Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: nearby neighborhood at Strawberry Lane Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed, residential Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1 Blends in with existing facility development

Line Contrast 1

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 1

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1 Very subordinate in view and is on scale with existing facility

Broken Horizon Line 0 Can be seen in the view but somewhat distant where discernible detail is not Visual Acuity 1.5 high Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 Existing facility absorbs some visibility and helps mitigate compared to if Screening/Mitigation Needed 0.5 nothing was there Total 6.5 Very little contrasts noted

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor is in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1

Duration of View 2.5 Residential neighborhood location

Presence of Existing Development 2

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2.5 Hudson River Corridor

Presence of Water 3

Total 17

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form ~1 Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/17/19 Viewpoint Number: 7b Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: nearby neighborhood at Strawberry Lane Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed, residential Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Even from a distance, the man-made structure appears to double in size Form Contrast 1 therefore, increasing the contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Line Contrast 1 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Texture Contrast 1 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Color Contrast 1 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1 contrast that already exists. Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken.

Visual Acuity .5 Minimal discernible detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No project clearing can be seen/determined. A minimum screening effort in the foreground should be able to mitigate this Screening/Mitigation Needed 1 view. Total 6.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor is in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail It can be concluded that a number of views throughout this region will be Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 2 that longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Several man-made structures can be observed in this view. This view seems fairly typical for this region however, it is picturesque with a Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 body of water present. Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 16.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality This view is picturesque in nature and pleasant to look at and includes a large General Scenic Quality of the View 2 body of water. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 7b Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: nearby neighborhood at Strawberry Lane Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed, residential Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1 New form adjacent to existing similar form

Line Contrast 1 New horizontal and vertical lines introduced

Texture Contrast 1

Color Contrast 1 New facility is similar in scale to the existing facility; represents small portion Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1 of the overall view Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0.5 Appears to be some, but minimal, clearing

Screening/Mitigation Needed 1 Minimal existing screening; existing facility is not screened

Total 7.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor is in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 Low use road but many houses in the vicinity

Duration of View 2 Long-duration views from residences

Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Existing facility as well as other development seen on both sides of river

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 Typical view for waterfront areas in the region

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River prominent within the view

Total 16.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 8b Preparer: JBartos Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: Commonwealth Ave intersection with CSX Transportation freight rail line within a residential area. Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0.5 Distant view

Line Contrast 0.5

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 0.5 Colors blend in with vegetated hill in background

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5 Very subordinate in the view

Broken Horizon Line 0.5

Visual Acuity 0.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 Existing facility helps absorb visibility with similar in-kind development. Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 Project is hardly noticeable but looks like a natural extension of existing station Total 3.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail Physically in an area without a lot of people but there will be views from the Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 trains. Duration of View 1 Transient views

Presence of Existing Development 1.5

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 3 Hudson River corridor

Presence of Water 3

Total 16.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/17/19 Viewpoint Number: 8b Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: Commonwealth Ave intersection with CSX Transportation freight rail line within a residential area. Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast .5 Minimal to no contrast can be discerned.

Line Contrast .5 Minimal to no contrast can be discerned.

Texture Contrast 0 Minimal to no contrast can be discerned.

Color Contrast .5 Minimal to no contrast can be discerned.

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance .5 Minimal to no contrast can be discerned.

Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken in this view.

Visual Acuity 0 No significant visual acuity can be discerned.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing efforts can be discerned.

Screening/Mitigation Needed .5 Minimal Screening/Mitigation effort is needed.

Total 2.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1.5 It can be concluded that views throughout this region will be present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 1.5 that longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Several other man-made structures can be observed in this view. This view is picturesque however, it seems industrial in nature due to the Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.0 railroad tracks/corridor and fairly typical for this region. Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 14.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1.0 This view is industrial in appearance. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 8b Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: Commonwealth Ave intersection with CSX Transportation freight rail line within a residential area. Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0.5 New form but difficult to discern

Line Contrast 1 New vertical lines visible

Texture Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast in text

Color Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast in color

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5 New facilities difficult to discern and is weak within landscape

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible Screening from railroad not necessary; nearby residences appear to have Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 existing screening Total 4

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1 Freight rail, minimal houses with similar view

Duration of View 2 Short duration from railroad, but longer views from residences

Presence of Existing Development 1 Existing development dominant along western river edge

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 Waterfront view with industrial components

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River prominent

Total 14.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1.5 Waterfront but industrial * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 13 Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: City of Newburgh Viewpoint Description: View from City of Newburgh Waterfront Trail along a waterfront park, and near Public Boat Launch. Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0.5

Line Contrast 0.5

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 0.5

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 0.5 Distant view and blends in with vegetated hill

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0

Total 3 Visual contrast are not that great/high.

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 City of Newburgh Waterfront Park

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 3 Waterfront park

Duration of View 1.5 transient

Presence of Existing Development 2.5

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5

Presence of Water 3

Total 20.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1.5 A lot of visual clutter, bridge, and urban development in the view * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/17/19 Viewpoint Number: 13 Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: City of Newburgh Viewpoint Description: View from City of Newburgh Waterfront Trail along a waterfront park, and near Public Boat Launch. Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Line Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Texture Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Color Contrast 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0 No significant contrast can be discerned.

Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken in this view.

Visual Acuity 0 No significant visual acuity can be discerned.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing efforts can be discerned.

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0.5 Little to no Screening/Mitigation effort is needed.

Total 0.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 City of Newburgh Waterfront Park

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail Although the proposed structure(s) are difficult to see from this vantage point, Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 it can be concluded that views throughout this region will be present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 2 that longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 2.5 Numerous man-made structures can be observed in this view.

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 This view is fairly picturesque.

Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 20.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality This view is picturesque in nature and pleasant to look at and assumed to be General Scenic Quality of the View 2 unique to others elsewhere. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 St:ronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 13 Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: City of Newburgh Viewpoint Description: View from City of Newburgh Waterfront Trail along a waterfront park, and near Public Boat Launch. Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0.5 New form but difficult to discern

Line Contrast 1 New vertical lines visible

Texture Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast in text

Color Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast in color

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5 New facilities difficult to discern and is weak within landscape

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 0

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible Existing facility is visible and not screened; screening would block views of Screening/Mitigation Needed 0.5 river Total 3.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 City of Newburgh Waterfront Park

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 Public park, assumed to have many users

Duration of View 1.5 Somewhat transient views but views would occur frequently while within park

Presence of Existing Development 2.5 Existing development and bridge within view

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 Somewhat unique open view of river and bridge

Presence of Water 3

Total 20

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 23 Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: from Metro-North Commuter Railroad and River Road North Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1.5

Line Contrast 1.5

Texture Contrast 1.5

Color Contrast 1.0 Expansion of existing facility in a lateral way of large components but view is Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1.5 far where Project is subordinate in view Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 2 A little closer with some discernible detail

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 Can’t really mitigate but facility blends in with vegetated hill and existing Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 facility Total 9 Visual contrasts appear weak to moderate

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating The Amtrak Montreal-Albany-New York Train is on this track and is Within a Visual Resource* 3 considered a scenic rail line View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

Presence of Existing Development 1.5

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 Hudson River is unique but view location is not

Presence of Water 3

Total 18.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strona TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/17/19 Viewpoint Number: 23 Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: from Metro-North Commuter Railroad and River Road North Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Form Contrast 1.5 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Line Contrast 1.5 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Texture Contrast 1.5 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Color Contrast 1.5 contrast that already exists. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 2 contrast that already exists. Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken.

Visual Acuity 1.5 Some discernible detail can be observed.

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail It can be concluded that a number of views throughout this region will be Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1.5 present but, somewhat limited. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 2 that some longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Several man-made structures can be observed in this view in the distance. This view seems fairly typical for this region with some picturesque qualities Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 with a body of water present. Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 18.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality This view seems conveys an industrial look and feel due to the railroad tracks General Scenic Quality of the View 1.5 but, still provides some picturesque qualities with a body of water present. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 StronQ TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 23 Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: from Metro-North Commuter Railroad and River Road North Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating New form; contrasts with natural surroundings but consistent with existing Form Contrast 1.5 facility Line Contrast 1.5 New horizontal and vertical lines

Texture Contrast 1 Contrasts with natural surroundings but consistent with existing facility Contrasts with natural surroundings and existing facility; less color contrast Color Contrast 1.5 than existing facility Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 2 Co-dominant within landscape

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0

Total 9

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail Numerous commuters on Amtrak and Metro North, minimal residences in Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 vicinity Short duration from rail; nearby residences with similar views would have Duration of View 1 longer duration view Presence of Existing Development 1 Railroad and existing facility

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 Waterfront view with industrial components

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River

Total 17.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1.5 Waterfront but industrial * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 25a Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View of site in neighborhood along River Rd North at higher elevation, east side of river. Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0.5 Project not very discernible.

Line Contrast 0.5 Not much line contrast due to view through bare branched trees

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 0.5 Colors muted

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 0.5 Bare branched vegetation obscures views

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0

Total 3.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 0

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1 Residential area

Duration of View 2.5 Resident with long duration view

Presence of Existing Development 2

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1 Within Hudson River valley but view is not outstanding

Presence of Water 0 Hudson River can’t be seen

Total 6.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1 View of a house with trees and shrubs in yard * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/19 Viewpoint Number: 25a Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View of site in neighborhood along River Rd North at higher elevation, east side of river. Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Form Contrast 1 contrast that already exists. The proposed addition extends horizontally increasing line contrast even Line Contrast 1 though scale is minimum within this view. The man-made addition is smooth in appearance creating additional contrast in Texture Contrast 1 texture. The man-made structure appears to double in size therefore, increasing the Color Contrast 1 color contrast that already exists. Although the scale of the man-made structure in this view is secondary, Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1 it appears to double in size therefore, increasing the scale. Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken.

Visual Acuity .5 Minimal discernible detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No project clearing can be seen/determined.

Screening/Mitigation Needed 2.5 A screening effort in the foreground will be needed to fully mitigate this view.

Total 8

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 0 It can be concluded that numerous views throughout this region will be Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 2.5 that longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 2.5 Other man-made structures (some residential) can be observed in this view.

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region .5 The view appears to be typical for this region.

Presence of Water 0 No.

Total 7.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality This view depicts a view that overlooks the surrounding area allowing for some General Scenic Quality of the View 1.0 scenic quality. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 25a Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View of site in neighborhood along River Rd North at higher elevation, east side of river. Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1 New form in landscape

Line Contrast 1 New horizontal and vertical lines introduced

Texture Contrast 1 Contrasts with existing setting

Color Contrast 1 Contrasts with existing setting

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1.5 Co-dominant within landscape

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible

Screening/Mitigation Needed 2 Minimal existing screening

Total 8.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 0

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 0

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 Public road and many residences nearby

Duration of View 2 Long duration from homes, short duration from road

Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Several existing industrial facilities within view

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1

Presence of Water 0

Total 6.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 27b Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View from Metro-North Commuter RR along Old Troy Rd at western boundary of Wheeler Hill Historic District Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Contrast not that great, much hidden by existing facility, is congruous with Form Contrast 1 features of existing station and not out of scale or different. Line Contrast 1

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 1.5

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5

Broken Horizon Line 0.5 Slightly

Visual Acuity 1.5 Some components a little bit discernible

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0

Total 6.5 Contrasts do not appear to be strong

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Western boundary of Wheeler Historic District.

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Not much in view but the existing facility

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 3 Hudson River corridor

Presence of Water 3

Total 19.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 Somewhat pretty water view * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/19 Viewpoint Number: 27b Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View from Metro-North Commuter RR along Old Troy Rd at western boundary of Wheeler Hill Historic District Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases the overall size Form Contrast 1 therefore, increasing the contrast that already exists. Line Contrast 1 The proposed addition extends horizontally increasing line contrast. The man-made addition is smooth in appearance creating additional contrast in Texture Contrast 1 texture. The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases the overall size Color Contrast 1 therefore, increasing the contrast that already exists. The structure dominates the shoreline and the proposed addition to the structure Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 2 increases the overall size therefore, increasing the contrast in scale and special dominance that already exists. Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken.

Visual Acuity 1.5 Some discernible detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No project clearing can be seen/determined. Some screening in the foreground will be needed to fully mitigate this Screening/Mitigation Needed 1 particular view. Total 8.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Western boundary of Wheeler Historic District.

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1.5 It can be concluded that some views throughout this region will be present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this region, it can be assumed Duration of View 1 that some longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 2 Other man-made structures can be observed in the background of this view.

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 The view (excluding the structure) is very picturesque for any region.

Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 18.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality The location and natural surroundings along the river possess scenic qualities General Scenic Quality of the View 1.5 however, the structure diminishes this dramatically. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 27b Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View from Metro-North Commuter RR along Old Troy Rd at western boundary of Wheeler Hill Historic District Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1 New form in landscape

Line Contrast 1 New horizontal and vertical lines introduced

Texture Contrast 1 Contrasts with existing setting

Color Contrast 1 Contrasts with existing setting

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1.5 Co-dominant within landscape

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible Open view of river and existing facilities; may need screening uphill from Screening/Mitigation Needed 1 viewport if view present from residences and/or roadway Total 7.5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Western boundary of Wheeler Historic District.

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail Many viewers on Amtrak and Metro North; public road and residences in Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 vicinity Duration of View 2 Long duration from homes, short duration from road and railroad

Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Several existing industrial facilities within view

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 Waterfront view

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River

Total 19.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1.5 Waterfront view but somewhat industrial * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 32b Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Poughkeepsie Viewpoint Description: Bowdoin County Park northeast of Project Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed, Open Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1.5 New expanded form against horizon line but is distant

Line Contrast 1.5 New expanded form against horizon line but is distant

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 0.5 Colors muted contrast not strong

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5 Subordinate in view.

Broken Horizon Line 3

Visual Acuity 0.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 Behind existing facility so proposed project is partially blocked plus blends in Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 with vegetated hill in background Contrasts not very strong, proposed project appears far away and not much of Total 8 it is visible Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Bowdoin County Park

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2.5 Recreational county park

Duration of View 1 Exact photo location is near parking area and not a focus area

Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Not much development in background view but development on the premises

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 3 Higher elevation view of the Hudson River

Presence of Water 3

Total 20

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/19 Viewpoint Number: 32b Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Poughkeepsie Viewpoint Description: Bowdoin County Park northeast of Project Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed, Open Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Texture Contrast .5 The man-made addition creates minimal additional contrast in texture. The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases the overall size Color Contrast .5 therefore, increasing (minimally) the contrast that already exists. The addition to the overall structure allows it to further stand out in the Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance .5 background as an unnatural feature creating even more contrast. Broken Horizon Line 3 The horizon line is broken.

Visual Acuity .5 Minimal discernible detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No project clearing can be seen/determined. Screening in the foreground will be needed to fully mitigate this particular Screening/Mitigation Needed 3 view. Total 9

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Bowdoin County Park

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail It can be concluded that this park is utilized often throughout the year and Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2.5 numerous viewers will be present. Due to the location of this proposed structure in this view, it can be assumed Duration of View 2.5 that longer-term duration of views will be present. Other man-made structures (associated with a park) can be observed in the Presence of Existing Development 2 foreground of this view. Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2.5 The view (excluding the structure) is very picturesque for any region.

Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 21.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 3 This view presents a very picturesque setting. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strona TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/2019 Viewpoint Number: 32b Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Poughkeepsie Viewpoint Description: Bowdoin County Park northeast of Project Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed, Open Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 1 New form in landscape

Line Contrast 1 New horizontal and vertical lines introduced

Texture Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast

Color Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5 Project size subordinate to other existing development in view

Broken Horizon Line 2

Visual Acuity 0.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible

Screening/Mitigation Needed 2 Open view from public park; currently there is a view of the existing facility

Total 8

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Bowdoin County Park

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River Corridor in the view

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 Public park, assumed to have many users

Duration of View 2 Park users would have long-duration and/or frequent views while in park

Presence of Existing Development 1.5 Existing industrial facilities in background, some park facilities in foreground

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River

Total 19.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 35 Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View from Old Castle Point Road near residences and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Some new forms detected but not with high contrast, matches scale of existing Form Contrast 1.5 development Line Contrast 1.5

Texture Contrast 1.5

Color Contrast 1.5 Color contrast not that strong, blends in with vegetated hill. While the components of the facility are large they are smaller compared to existing facility. And, VP is closer than many others and on the side of the Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1.5 Project which shows more but still, the Project does not consume much of the view extents Broken Horizon Line 0.5 Not much, just a little VP is closer showing more discernible detail but visually blends in to the Visual Acuity 1.5 vegetated ridge in the background Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 Difficult to mitigate at this size but merely looks like an extension of existing Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 in-kind development which helps mitigate visual effects Total 9.5

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 There will be views from the road and from the trains.

Duration of View 1 Transient views

Presence of Existing Development 2 somewhat

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2 In the Hudson River corridor but not outstanding location

Presence of Water 3

Total 19

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong TRC Visual Impact Rating Form ~1 Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/19 Viewpoint Number: 35 Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View from Old Castle Point Road near residences and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases the overall size Form Contrast 1.5 therefore, increasing the contrast that already exists. Line Contrast 1..5 The proposed addition extends horizontally increasing line contrast.

Texture Contrast 1.5 The man-made additions create additional contrast in texture. The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases the overall size Color Contrast 1 therefore, increasing (minimally) the contrast that already exists. The addition to the overall structure allows it to further stand out in the Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 1.5 background as an unnatural feature creating even more contrast. Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is broken by the new proposed structures.

Visual Acuity 1.5 Some discernible detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No project clearing can be seen/determined. Some screening effort in the foreground will be needed to fully mitigate this Screening/Mitigation Needed 1.5 particular view. Total 10

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail It appears that a marina is present and other structures as well indicating that Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 numerous viewers will be present. Due to the location of this marina and its proximity to the proposed structures Duration of View 2.5 in this view, it can be assumed that longer-term duration of views will be present. Presence of Existing Development 2 Other man-made structures can be observed in this view.

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 The view is somewhat unique due to its location along a riverfront.

Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 20

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 This view presents a fairly picturesque setting. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 weak 2 Moderate 3 Strona TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/21/2019 Viewpoint Number: 35 Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Wappinger Viewpoint Description: View from Old Castle Point Road near residences and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Landscape Similarity Zone: Developed residential; Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☒ Resident ☒ Commuter/Traveler ☒ Local Motorist ☐ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating New form; contrasts with natural surroundings but consistent with existing Form Contrast 1.5 facility Line Contrast 1.5 New horizontal and vertical lines

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No clearing visible

Screening/Mitigation Needed 1.5

Total 10.5

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail Numerous commuters on Amtrak and Metro North, residences and marina in Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 vicinity Short duration from rail; nearby residences with similar views and marina users Duration of View 1.5 would have longer duration view Presence of Existing Development 1 Railroad and existing facility

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 Waterfront view with industrial components

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River

Total 18

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Ratina Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.15.19 Viewpoint Number: 37 Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: View from Hudson River Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 3 Large new forms compared to existing conditions

Line Contrast 3 New lines in environment providing contrast vs. existing

Texture Contrast 3

Color Contrast 2.5 Some color contrast and value consistent or similar to station and enviorment

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 3 Appears large in the view due to proximity

Broken Horizon Line 3

Visual Acuity 3 High detail noted. Close to project.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 3 Any project clearing is noted

Screening/Mitigation Needed 1.5 Difficult to mitigate but it appears as an expansion of existing facility Project is large and apparent in the view due to close distance where contrasts Total 25 are rated high Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail. This view is Within a Visual Resource* 3 from the water. View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1 Recreational water activities are present but not extremely high use in location

Duration of View 2 Project in view when on the water

Presence of Existing Development 1 Existing facility Within Hudson River corridor but VP location not unique or outstanding Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1 compared to other Hudson River views Presence of Water 3

Total 14

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 0.5 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 St:ronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/19 Viewpoint Number: 37 Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: View from Hudson River Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating The proposed additions to the existing man-made structure contrast Form Contrast 3 dramatically in this view with the existing conditions prior to its development. The proposed additions to the existing man-made structure contrast Line Contrast 3 dramatically in this view with the existing conditions prior to its development. The proposed additions to the existing man-made structure contrast Texture Contrast 3 dramatically in this view with the existing conditions prior to its development. The proposed additions to the existing man-made structure contrast Color Contrast 3 dramatically in this view with the existing conditions prior to its development. The proposed additions to the existing man-made structure contrast Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 3 dramatically in this view with the existing conditions prior to its development. Broken Horizon Line 3 The horizon line is broken by the new proposed structures.

Visual Acuity 3 Discernable detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 3 Project clearing can be seen/realized in this view. Significant screening effort in the foreground will be needed to fully mitigate Screening/Mitigation Needed 3 this particular view. Total 27

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail. This view is Within a Visual Resource* 3 from the water. View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 0

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail It appears that the majority of people/viewers will be those who utilize the river Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1.5 which may limit the number of viewers overall. Due to the location of these structures, people who are using the river will more Duration of View 2 than likely have long duration of views. Presence of Existing Development 2 Other man-made structures can be observed in this view.

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1 This view is not unique to the surrounding region.

Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 15.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1 This view does not possess scenic qualities. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/21/2019 Viewpoint Number: 37 Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Newburgh Viewpoint Description: View from Hudson River Landscape Similarity Zone: Hudson River Corridor Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☐ Leaf On ☒ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 3 Several new forms added to view

Line Contrast 3 New horizontal and vertical lines introduced

Texture Contrast 3 Contrasts with existing surroundings

Color Contrast 2.5 Contrasts with natural surroundings but consistent with existing facilities

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 3 Proposed facilities are the dominant feature in this view

Broken Horizon Line 2.5 Horizon broken in multiple locations

Visual Acuity 2

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 2 Clearing for project footprint visible

Screening/Mitigation Needed 2 Minimal existing screening

Total 23

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 1.5 Users of the river would have this view

Duration of View 1.5 Moderate length views while traveling on river

Presence of Existing Development 1 Existing industrial facilities within view

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1 Not unique

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River

Total 14

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 1 View is of an industrial area * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10.17.2019 Viewpoint Number: 38 Preparer: J Bartos Viewpoint Location: Fishkill Viewpoint Description: View from observation location on Mount Beacon in Hudson Highlands State Park Landscape Similarity Zone: Forested Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Project is far. There is a lot of other development that is observed and keeps Form Contrast 0.5 the eye busy. Line Contrast 0.5

Texture Contrast 0.5

Color Contrast 0.5

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 0.5

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0

Screening/Mitigation Needed 0 Project is hardly noticeable. Contrasts are very weak. There is slightly Total 3 discernible change but is adjacent to existing facility. Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Mount Beacon is within Hudson Highlands State Park.

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 VP is within a listed state park with the Hudson River in view

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 High use destination trails and observation scenic overlook

Duration of View 1.5 Duration of view is likely not extremely long Virtually none at the observation overlook although there is development in the Presence of Existing Development 1 view. Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 3 High elevation 360 degree overlook of the Hudson Valley is unique

Presence of Water 3

Total 19.5

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2.5 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 St:ronq TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/18/19 Viewpoint Number: 38 Preparer: Michael Ross Viewpoint Location: Fishkill Viewpoint Description: View from observation location on Mount Beacon in Hudson Highlands State Park Landscape Similarity Zone: Forested Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases the overall size Form Contrast .5 therefore, increasing the contrast that already exists minimally due to distance. The proposed addition extends horizontally increasing line contrast minimally Line Contrast .5 due to distance. Texture Contrast .5 The proposed addition increases texture contrast minimally due to distance. The proposed addition to the man-made structure increases color contrast Color Contrast .5 minimally due to distance. The proposed structure(s) in this view are far off in the distance therefore, Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance .5 the special dominance and impact due to scale is minimal at best. Broken Horizon Line 0 The horizon line is not broken.

Visual Acuity 0 Little to no discernible detail can be observed.

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0 No project clearing can be seen/determined. Minimal screening efforts in the foreground will be needed to fully mitigate Screening/Mitigation Needed .5 this particular view. Total 3

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Mount Beacon within Hudson Highlands State Park.

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 VP is within a listed state park with the Hudson River in view

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 High use destination trails and observation scenic overlook

Duration of View 2 It can be concluded that views throughout this region will be present.

Presence of Existing Development 2.5 Numerous man-made structures are present throughout this view. This view presents surroundings that are typical for this region although the Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 1.5 river running through this view presents some uniqueness in nature. Presence of Water 3 Yes.

Total 20

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2.5 The view of this region is very picturesque. * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Stron q TRC Visual Impact Rating Form

Project: Danskammer Energy Center Date: 10/21/2019 Viewpoint Number: 38 Preparer: Heather Vaillant Viewpoint Location: Fishkill Viewpoint Description: View from observation location on Mount Beacon in Hudson Highlands State Park Landscape Similarity Zone: Forested Viewer Type (check all that apply): ☐ Resident ☐ Commuter/Traveler ☐ Local Motorist ☒ Recreational ☐ Worker Seasonal Condition: ☒ Leaf On ☐ Leaf Off

Visual Rating Element Rating Notes

Part 1 Visual Contrast Rating Form Contrast 0.5 New form but difficult to discern

Line Contrast 0.5 Minimal line contrast

Texture Contrast 0.5 Minimal contrast in text

Color Contrast 1 Minimal contrast in color

Project Scale Contrast/Spatial Dominance 0.5 New facilities difficult to discern and is weak within landscape

Broken Horizon Line 0

Visual Acuity 1

Amount of Project Clearing Seen 0.5 Minimal clearing visible Minimal screening required; existing view of existing facility and other Screening/Mitigation Needed 0.5 industrial land uses Total 5

Part 2 Viewpoint Sensitivity Rating

Within a Visual Resource* 3 Mount Beacon within Hudson Highlands State Park.

View of Other Visual Resource with Project* 3 Hudson River is an American Heritage River and Greenway Trail

A Listed/Known Scenic Resource of Visual Quality* 3 VP is within a listed state park with the Hudson River in view

Number of Viewers (Low or High Use Activity) 2 High use destination trails and observation scenic overlook

Duration of View 2 Long-duration and multiple viewpoints from park

Presence of Existing Development 1 Existing industrial facilities prominent on banks of Hudson River

Uniqueness of Landscape Compared to Region 2

Presence of Water 3 Hudson River

Total 19

Part 3 Scenic Quality

General Scenic Quality of the View 2.5 * these visual rating elements are yes or no answers. Therefore, a rating of 0 or 3 should be applied

Rating Scale 0 None 1 Weak 2 Moderate 3 Strong DANSKAMMER ENERGY CENTER ARTICLE 10 EXHIBIT 24

CONDENSED VAPOR PLUME VISIBILITY STUDY

ATTACHMENT 6

COMBUSTION PLUME VISIBILITY

A major exhaust byproduct of the combustion turbine electric generating process is water vapor. With each pound of natural gas fired, over two pounds of water vapor are formed. Water is also injected into the combustion chamber during ULSD firing for NOx suppression. Since the combustion turbine exhaust gas contains appreciably more water vapor than the ambient air, an analysis was performed to determine if the exhaust plume could condense and become visible under normal atmospheric conditions. A visible plume formed under such conditions is called a mixed vapor plume. When hot, humid exhaust gas is vented to a cooler humid atmosphere, the combination may be at or above the saturation level and a visible plume will form. This is like seeing one's breath on a cold morning. The condensed vapor plume was indicated to be visible if it occurred during conditions which would allow it to be viewed by the general public. This definition would normally exclude plumes being formed at night and during periods of bad weather (rain, snow, or fog) that obscure visibility. The plume visibility analysis for the proposed Project was prepared to calculate the formation of condensed vapor plumes from the exhaust gas, and subsequent visible plumes for all hours within the subject meteorological database, and subsequently excludes the hours when a condensed plume forms at night. The plume visibility criteria would also exclude plumes occurring during inclement weather. However, weather conditions were not available in the meteorological data set, thus the analysis conservatively examined all weather conditions as potential for visible plume formation. The plume visibility analysis for the proposed Project was performed using the exhaust conditions of a single MHPS 501JAC combustion turbine operating in combined cycle mode with supplemental firing in the HRSG. The analysis considered both natural gas and ULSD. The average hours of condensed vapor plumes and those plumes that may be considered visible was assessed using a plume visibility model developed by TRC. A. TRC PLUME VISIBILITY MODEL TRC's plume visibility model is a post processor used with output results from the widely recognized EPA AERMOD atmospheric dispersion model. Since water vapor is a non- reactive gas and emitted at a temperature well above its dew point, the downwind dispersion characteristics are accurately simulated using AERMOD. The AERMOD model was run using five years of actual hourly meteorological data from the Hudson Valley Regional Airport (KPOU) (WBAN #14757), New York, for the years 2014-2018. The meteorological conditions used in this plume visibility analysis are the same as were used for the air quality assessment for the proposed Project. Since the object of this study was to determine the potential total number of hours of visible plumes, the analysis was simplified by using the same wind direction for each hour. Visible plume formation was determined by comparing the hourly water vapor concentrations calculated at all receptors to actual meteorological observations and the calculated saturation deficit. The saturation deficit is a measure of the amount of additional water vapor that must be added to a volume of air to bring it to saturation (i.e. 100 percent humidity.) Under normal atmospheric pressure, air cannot remain supersaturated and the excess water vapor will condense to form liquid water droplets. The liquid water content (LWC) of the cloud is the excess moisture over saturation and is calculated as the modeled concentration of water vapor minus the saturation deficit. The visual density of the condensed vapor plume is dependent upon the LWC and size of the water droplets. Clouds with a low LWC tend to be diffuse, while clouds with a high LWC are opaque. The size of the droplets determines the brightness of the plume, with

very small droplets giving a bright, white appearance; while larger droplets give a duller, grey appearance. For comparison to natural clouds, the liquid water content associated with atmospheric clouds is provided in Table 1. Table 1 Liquid Water Content of Typical Atmospheric Clouds Cloud Type LWC (g/m3) Small cumulus 0.2 - 0.5 Larger cumulus 0.5 - 1.0 Cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) 1.0 - 5.0+ Altocumulus/altostratus 0.2 - 0.5 Stratus 0.1 - 0.5 Nimbostratus (rainstorm) 0.2 - 5 Source: Weatherwise, American Meteorological Society, May/June 2000.

This analysis used a LWC of 0.1 g/m3 as the threshold for determining a condensed vapor plume. As noted in the above table, the minimum water content for stratus clouds is 0.1 g/m3. Therefore, combustion turbine plumes with a LWC of less than 0.1 g/m3 likely would be too diffuse and would evaporate very rapidly to be considered visible plumes. A visible plume was assumed to occur if the water vapor concentration exceeded the saturation deficit for each specific location and hour modeled. Under these conditions, TRC's model assumes the vapor plume will condense to form a visible cloud. The model calculates the total number of hours of plume formation for all of the hours within the meteorological data set. These hours are divided into time of day and ambient temperature, which may preclude observation of the condensed vapor plume by the casual observer. These periods include: • Total number of hours when condensed plumes formed • Plumes during the night only • Plumes during the day only Sunrise and sunset for each day of the year were calculated based on the actual geographic location of the proposed Project. Daylight periods included one hour before sunrise until one hour after sunset (dawn and twilight). TRC considers that only plumes that occur during the day with clear weather are visible condensed vapor plumes from the combustion turbine; however, the total frequency of condensed plume hours for both day and night conditions is tabulated. B. MODELING METHODOLOGY The visible plume modeling analysis examined the water vapor emissions during all conditions when the combustion turbine would operate. The operating conditions for the combustion turbine were provided by the vendor as twenty-five (25) cases of varying load, ambient temperature, supplemental firing and fuel (natural gas and ULSD). As discussed previously, the greatest amount of water emitted originates from the combustion of natural gas, however, the ULSD firing cases were examined for a full evaluation. Other sources of water (carrier water for the aqueous ammonia solution for NOx control, and the

water formed by the ammonia reaction) are ignored since these sources of water are miniscule when compared to the total water emission rate (less than 0.5 percent). C. ANALYSIS RESULTS The analysis examined all 25 operating cases using 43,848 hourly observations of meteorological conditions. This was to determine the operating case resulting in the greatest number of potential visible plumes. Figure 1 graphically illustrates the number of visible plumes calculated for all operating cases. Figure 1 Summary of Visible Plumes by Operating Cases

Daytime Visible Plumes by Case

1200

1000

800 m >-

~ 600 I

400

200

0 I 1111111

In order to determine the worst-case estimate of potential condensed and visible plume formation for the year, the operating case with the greatest number of potential visible plumes was selected. This is shown by case 10 with an average of 953 hours of visible plumes per year. This case represents the combustion turbine operating on natural gas at 100% load for the full year. All other operating cases would result in fewer visible plumes per year.

Figure 2 illustrates the frequency and location (relative to the exhaust stack) of all visible plumes formed for case 10. Since the exhaust gas is hot and the plume is above the saturation temperature, the condensed vapor plumes would often appear detached from the 200-foot (61 meter) stack as depicted by the cyan rectangle in Figure 2. Figure 2 Summary of Visible Plumes for Case 10

Average Visible Plumes per Year (Case 10)

250

_ 200 ~ Cl) Q) .S 150 .E O> ·a5 I 100

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 Downwind distance all hours (meters)

The greatest number of visible plumes may be seen at a height of about 25 meters above the stack top at a distance of about 25 meters downwind. At this location, the observer may expect to see about 500 hours of visible plumes per year. On average, about 100 hours of plumes may rise as high as 150 meters above the ground. Most plumes would dissipate within 50 meters of the stack, while some (50 hours or less) may extend to 100 meters downwind from the stack. Such extended plumes would appear to be broken and evaporating. Note that in Figure 2 all of the visible plumes are collapsed to a single direction, while in reality the plumes would form in the downwind direction for the specific hour of occurrence. This would cause significantly fewer visible plumes in any single direction and likewise substantially decrease the likelihood for a plume to constantly be visible from a specific location. D. CONCLUSION Danskammer conservatively assessed the possibility for visible plumes from the operation of the combustion turbine. The analysis determined that under the worst scenario operating conditions a visible (during daytime conditions) condensed vapor plume would occur approximately 953 hours per year (represented by the combustion turbine case 10), or 11 percent of the full year. In reality, the anticipated number of visible plumes would be the sum of plumes formed under the various operating cases modeled which would be less than the worst case. The hours of condensed plume formation were divided into day and night. A visible plume was considered as any vapor plume that formed during daylight conditions regardless of weather conditions. Most of the

combustion plumes may occur during the morning hours when the ambient humidity is highest and are generally visible at and for a few hours after dawn. In conclusion, the exhaust from the combustion turbine may result in visible plumes but few in number appearing very close to the stack and usually during the colder months. The visible plumes would most likely occur during the morning hours and would be light and wispy in character. The plumes would appear denser close to the stack, since the water droplets are quite small in this part of the plume and would rapidly dissipate and evaporate. As the plumes travel downwind, the droplets begin to coalesce and evaporate. As such, the portion of plumes further downwind would appear duller and dissipate quickly and evaporate entirely within a few hundred feet downwind of the exhaust stack. In general, the maximum distance a scant few visible plumes (per year) would extend to, would be only several hundred feet downwind and would not be expected to be visually intrusive. Due to the very light and translucent nature of any condensed combustion plumes being formed, along with their ephemeral occurrence during the year, such plumes would be invisible and not detectable to an observer at distances at and beyond 5-miles.

DANSKAMMER ENERGY CENTER ARTICLE 10 EXHIBIT 24

HISTORIC SITES LISTING WITHIN THE DANSKAMMER VISUAL STUDY AREA

ATTACHMENT 7

Table of Contents

Table 4-A NRHP Listed Historic Sites ...... 1 Table 4-B NRHP Listed Historic Districts ...... 2 Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites ...... 3 Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites ...... 15

Table 4-A NRHP Listed Historic Sites Potential USN Resource Distance (Miles) Town Visibility

NRHP Listed Historic Mount Beacon Incline Railway and 2706.000022 5.7 No Beacon Power House 2741.000189 Bogardus-DeWindt 3.8 No Beacon Beacon Engine Company No. 1 2741.000196 4.9 No Beacon Firehouse 2741.000197 Brett, Madam Catharyna, Homestead 4.8 No Beacon 2741.000293 Eustatia 4.1 No Beacon National Biscuit Company Carton 2741.000301 4.9 No Beacon Making and Printing Plant 2741.00035 Howland Library 4.8 No Beacon 2741.000358 US Post Office--Beacon 4.7 No Beacon 2741.000399 DuBois, Peter C., House 6.1 No Beacon 7140.00006 Crawford, David, House 4.8 Yes City of Newburgh Old Town Cemetery and Palatine 7140.00015 5 No City of Newburgh Church Site n/a Storm King Highway 9.4 No Cornwall 7103.000031 Clark, A. J., Store 10 No Cornwall 7103.000034 Canterbury Presbyterian Church 10 No Cornwall 7103.000078 Ring House 9.7 No Cornwall 7103.000113 Scribner House 9.7 No Cornwall 7149.000034 Upland Lawn 9.5 No Cornwall 7149.000038 Camp Olmsted 9.2 No Cornwall 7149.000039 River View House 9.2 No Cornwall 7149.000052 Barr, Amelia, House 10.5 No Cornwall 7149.000054 Gatehouse on Deerhill Road 10.5 No Cornwall 7149.000062 LeDoux/Healey House 10.5 No Cornwall 7149.000063 Deer Hill 10.5 No Cornwall 7149.000121 Wyant--Talbot House 9.3 No Cornwall 2706.000003 Stony Kill Farm 2.3 No Fishkill 2706.00001 Mount Gulian 3.4 No Fishkill 2706.000034 Bannerman's Island Arsenal 8.1 No Fishkill 2706.000035 Dutchess Manor 7.1 No Fishkill Reformed Dutch Church of Fishkill 2741.000313 4.6 No Fishkill Landing 11109.00003 Chapel Hill Bible Church 2.1 No Marlborough 11150.00001 Dubois-Sarles Octagon 2.1 No Marlborough 7115.000004 St. Thomas Episcopal Church 7.5 No New Windsor

Table 4-A NRHP Listed Historic Sites Potential USN Resource Distance (Miles) Town Visibility

NRHP Listed Historic 7114.000003 Gomez Mill House 1.3 No Newburgh 7114.000068 Maple Lawn 4 No Newburgh 7114.000124 Powelton Club 4.3 No Newburgh Bloomer-Dailey House and Balmville 7114.000139 3.6 No Newburgh Tree 7114.000155 Cosman Family Cemetery 2.1 No Newburgh 2714.000161 Shay's Warehouse and Stable 1.4 Yes Poughkeepsie 2714.000165 Shay, William, Double House 1.4 Yes Poughkeepsie 2714.000196 Brower, Abraham, House 1.5 Yes Poughkeepsie 2714.000202 Brower, Adolph, House 1.5 Yes Poughkeepsie 2714.000205 Zion Memorial Chapel 1.5 No Poughkeepsie 2714.000237 Union Free School 1.6 No Poughkeepsie 2719.000057 Saint Mark's Episcopal Church 1.4 No Wappinger 2719.000058 Chelsea Grammar School 1.4 No Wappinger 2719.000127 Carnwath Farm 0.9 No Wappinger 2719.000192 Carman, Cornelius, House 1.5 No Wappinger 2719.000193 Collyer, Capt. Moses W., House 1.4 Yes Wappinger 2744.000073 Bain Commercial Building 3.1 No Wappinger Falls Duchess Company Superintendent's 2744.000087 2.6 No Wappinger Falls House 2744.000143 US Post Office--Wappingers Falls 3.2 No Wappinger Falls 2744.000198 Mulhern House 2.9 No Wappinger Falls

Table 4-B NRHP Listed Historic Districts Potential USN Resource Distance (Miles) Town Visibility 2741.000492 Lower Main Street Historic District 4.4 No Beacon 7140.002593 East End Historic District 4.5 No City of Newburgh 2745.000031 Fishkill Village District 4.3 No Fishkill Village 2714.000235 Stone Street Historic District 1.5 No Poughkeepsie 2714.000236 Main Street Historic District 1.4 No Poughkeepsie 2719.000231 Wheeler Hill Historic 0.6 Yes Wappinger 2744.000252 Wappingers Falls Historic District 2.7 No Wappingers Falls

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2741.000492 Lower Main Street Historic District

2741.000288 Overby Apts 142 Main St, Beacon 2741.000289 Valentine Commerical 144-146 Main St, Beacon 2741.00029 Kranz Commercial 150 Main St, Beacon 2741.000291 Vacant 152 Main St, Beacon 2741.000292 Vacant 152 1/2 Main St, Beacon 2741.000293 Galaburda Commercial 158-60 Main St, Beacon 2741.000294 Tomasi Commercial 164-66 Main St, Beacon 2741.000295 Cahn Commercial 172 Main St, Beacon 2741.000296 Dondero Block 174-178 Main St, Beacon 2741.000297 Knapp Commercial 180 Main St, Beacon 2741.000298 Christopher 182 Main St, Beacon 2741.000299 Planners Commercial 184 Main Street, Beacon 2741.0003 Sonnak Commercial 186-188 Main St, Beacon 2741.000301 Sonnak Commercial 190 Main St, Beacon 2741.000302 Faison Commercial 192 Main St, Beacon 2741.000303 Nicholson Apts 131 Main St, Beacon 2741.000304 Nicholson Apts 133-37 Main St, Beacon 2741.000305 Star Of Bethlehem Church 139-141 Main St, Beacon 2741.000306 Shebanie Commercial 143-145 Main St, Beacon 2741.000307 Smith Commercial 149 Main St, Beacon 2741.000308 Vacant 151 Main St, Beacon 2741.000309 Nuccitelli Commercial 153-155 Main St, Beacon 2741.00031 Alvarez Comm 157-161 Main St, Beacon 2741.000311 Acosta Commercial 163-65 Main St, Beacon 2741.000313 Nuccitell Comm 169-173 Main St, Beacon 2741.000314 Vacant 175 Main St, Beacon 2741.000315 Romano Commercial 177-79 Main St, Beacon 2741.000317 Trifilo Commercial 193 Main St, Beacon 2741.000318 Trifilo Commercial 195 Main St, Beacon 2741.000319 Charkaus Commercial 197-199 Main St, Beacon 2741.00032 Jajaque Commercial 201-11 Main St, Beacon 2741.000321 Luciani Commercial 213 Main St, Beacon 2741.000322 Norbeth Hall Assoc Inc. 215 Main St, Beacon 2741.000323 Norbeth Hall Assc Inc 217 Main St, Beacon

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2741.000324 Norbeth Hall Assoc Inc 219 Main St, Beacon 2741.000353 Unnamed 162 Main St, Beacon 2741.000354 Unnamed 164 Main St, Beacon 2741.000355 Unnamed 139 Main St, Beacon 2741.000356 Unnamed 143 Main St, Beacon 2741.000357 Unnamed 167 Main St, Beacon 2741.000358 Unnamed 181-183 Main St, Beacon 2741.000359 Unnamed 219-221 Main St, Beacon

7140.002593 East End Historic District (First 100 are listed as there are 2195 sites within district)

7140.000001 Unnamed 259 Broadway , Newburgh 7140.000007 Unnamed 151 Liberty St, Newburgh 7140.000060 Crawford, David, House 189 Montgomery Street, Newburgh 7140.000150 Old Town Cemetery And Palatine Church Site 217-241 Grand St, Newburgh, 7140.000250 Unnamed 75 Broadway, Newburgh 7140.000264 Unnamed 3 Johnes Street, Newburgh 7140.000265 Unnamed 10 Grand Street, Newburgh 7140.000266 Unnamed 26 Farrington St, Newburgh 7140.000267 Unnamed 155 Lander Street, Newburgh 7140.000269 Unnamed 484 Liberty Street, Newburgh 7140.000273 Unnamed 17 Grand Street, Newburgh 7140.000279 Unnamed 101 Liberty Street, Newburgh 7140.000283 Unnamed 145 Broadway, Newburgh 7140.000287 Unnamed 167 Broadway, Newburgh 7140.000288 Unnamed 101 Washington Street, Newburgh 7140.000305 Unnamed 1-5 Amity St, Newburgh 7140.000306 Unnamed 6-8 Amity St, Newburgh 7140.000307 Unnamed 75 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000308 Unnamed 77 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000309 Unnamed 79 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000310 Unnamed 81 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000311 Unnamed 83 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000312 Unnamed 85 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000313 Unnamed 87 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000314 Unnamed 89 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000315 Unnamed 91 Ann St, Newburgh

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

7140.000316 Unnamed 93 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000317 Unnamed 95 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000318 Unnamed 143 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000319 Unnamed 144 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000320 Unnamed 147 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000321 Unnamed 151 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000322 Unnamed 153 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000323 Unnamed 155 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000324 Unnamed 157 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000325 Unnamed 165 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000326 Unnamed 167 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000327 Unnamed 169-171 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000328 Unnamed 82 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000329 Unnamed 160 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000330 Unnamed 176-178 Ann St, Newburgh 7140.000331 Unnamed 180 Ann Street, Newburgh 7140.000332 Unnamed 39 Avoca St, Newburgh 7140.000333 Unnamed 2 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000334 Unnamed 6 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000335 Unnamed 8 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000336 Unnamed 2 Courtney Avenue, Newburgh 7140.000337 Unnamed 10 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000338 Unnamed 12 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000339 Unnamed 14-15 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000340 Unnamed 16 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000341 Unnamed 18 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000342 Unnamed 20 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000343 Unnamed 22 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000344 Unnamed 23 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000345 Unnamed 25 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000346 Unnamed 27 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000347 Unnamed 28 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000348 Unnamed 29 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000349 Unnamed 32 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000350 Unnamed 33 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000351 Unnamed 37 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000352 Unnamed 39 Bay View, Newburgh

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

7140.000353 Unnamed 42 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000354 Unnamed 45 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000355 Unnamed 46 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000356 Unnamed 48 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000357 Unnamed 50 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000358 Unnamed 52 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000359 Unnamed 56 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000360 Unnamed 60 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000361 Unnamed 62 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000362 Unnamed 68 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000363 Unnamed 72 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000364 Unnamed 70 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000365 Unnamed 74 Bayview Terr, Newburgh 7140.000366 Unnamed 75 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000367 Unnamed 161 Bay View, Newburgh 7140.000368 Unnamed 45 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000369 Unnamed 47 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000370 Unnamed 49 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000371 Unnamed 53 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000372 Unnamed 55 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000373 Unnamed 59 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000374 Unnamed 61 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000375 Unnamed 63 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000376 Unnamed 67 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000377 Unnamed 69 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000378 Unnamed 81 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000379 Unnamed 83 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000380 Unnamed 87 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000381 Unnamed 95-97 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000382 Unnamed 44 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000383 Unnamed 46 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000384 Unnamed 48 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000385 Unnamed 50 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000386 Unnamed 52 Beacon St, Newburgh 7140.000387 Unnamed 60 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000388 Unnamed 62 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000389 Unnamed 64 Beacon Street, Newburgh

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

7140.000390 Unnamed 66 Beacon Street, Newburgh 7140.000391 Unnamed 70 Rear Beacon Street, Newburgh

2745.000031 Fishkill Village District

2745.000071 Unnamed 10 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000091 Unnamed 10 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000045 Unnamed 100 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000044 Unnamed 102 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000043 Unnamed 103 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000042 Unnamed 106 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000033 Unnamed 109 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000092 Unnamed 11 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000039 Unnamed 111 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000036 Unnamed 116 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000041 Unnamed 117 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000007 Unnamed 118 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000065 Unnamed 1183 Main St, Fishkill 2745.00004 Unnamed 119 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000098 Unnamed 12 Bedford Ave, Fishkill 2745.000072 Unnamed 12 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000037 Unnamed 14 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000099 Unnamed 15 Bedford Ave, Fishkill 2745.000093 Unnamed 15 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.0001 Unnamed 16 Bedford Ave, Fishkill 2745.000094 Unnamed 17 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000073 Unnamed 20 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000067 Unnamed 20 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000074 Unnamed 24 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000075 Unnamed 26 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000076 Unnamed 29 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000077 Unnamed 30 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000078 Unnamed 33 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000066 Unnamed 33 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000101 Unnamed 34 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000079 Unnamed 35 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000102 Unnamed 35 Jackson St, Fishkill

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2745.000103 Unnamed 36 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000104 Unnamed 38 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000105 Unnamed 39 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000064 Unnamed 39 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000068 Unnamed 4 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000081 Unnamed 40 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000106 Unnamed 41 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000107 Unnamed 42 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000082 Unnamed 43 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000063 Unnamed 43 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000083 Unnamed 44 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000108 Unnamed 44 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000112 Unnamed 45 Hopewell Ave, Fishkill 2745.000109 Unnamed 45 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000084 Unnamed 46 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.00011 Unnamed 46 Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000085 Unnamed 48 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000113 Unnamed 48 Hopewell Ave, Fishkill 2745.000114 Unnamed 49 Hopewell Ave, Fishkill 2745.000034 Unnamed 5 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000086 Unnamed 51 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000115 Unnamed 52 Hopewell Ave, Fishkill 2745.000087 Unnamed 54 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000116 Unnamed 56 Hopewell Ave, Fishkill 2745.000069 Unnamed 6 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000062 Unnamed 67 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000061 Unnamed 69 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000035 Unnamed 7 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.00006 Unnamed 71 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000059 Unnamed 73 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000058 Unnamed 75 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000057 Unnamed 77 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000038 Unnamed 78-81 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000056 Unnamed 79 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000096 Unnamed 8 Bedford Ave, Fishkill 2745.000055 Unnamed 81 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000054 Unnamed 85 Main St, Fishkill

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2745.000053 Unnamed 87 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000052 Unnamed 88 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000097 Unnamed 9 Bedford Ave, Fishkill 2745.00007 Unnamed 9 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.00009 Unnamed 9 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000051 Unnamed 90 Main St, Fishkill 2745.00005 Unnamed 94 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000049 Unnamed 95 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000048 Unnamed 96 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000047 Unnamed 97 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000046 Unnamed 98 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000088 Blodgett Memorial Library 37 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000027 Charon House 25 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000111 Coach House Jackson St, Fishkill 2745.000011 Donnely House 107 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000032 Dutch Reformed Church Fishkill 2745.000021 Erts House 19 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000095 Firehouse (Insurance Building) Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000118 Fishkill Inn 184 Main St, Fishkill 2745.00003 Fishkill Methodist Church Fishkill 2745.00001 Fishkill Town Hall Fishkill 2745.000121 Jackson Fishkill 2745.000013 Mayor Taylors Home 104 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000025 Mccabe House 12 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000014 Mckees Hardware 101 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000089 Methodist Church Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000006 Mid Hudson Medical Group Bldg. Fishkill 2745.000024 Scafield Hse 14 Robinson St, Fishkill 2745.000005 Shillelagh (James Gwen House) 93 Main St, Fishkill 2745.000012 St Marys Chapel Fishkill 2745.000022 Temerance Hall 21 Broad St, Fishkill 2745.000002 Trinity Church Fishkill 2745.000015 Van Wyck Hall 91 Main St, Fishkill

2714.000235 Stone Street Historic District

2714.000056 Res 7 Stone St, Poughkeepsie

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2714.000192 Res 9 Stone St, Poughkeepsie 2714.000207 Van Anden House 5 Stone St, Poughkeepsie 2714.000208 Ellis House 18 Division St, Poughkeepsie

2714.000236 Main Street Historic District

2714.000048 Hotel 15 Main St, Poughkeepsie 2714.000049 Unnamed 9 A Main St, Poughkeepsie 2714.00005 Res 13 Main St, Poughkeepsie 2714.000148 Nevin Res 11 Main St, Poughkeepsie 2714.00021 Myers Store 10 Main St, Poughkeepsie 2714.000239 Unnamed 12 Main St, Poughkeepsie

Potential 2719.000231 Wheeler Hill Historic District Visibility

2719.000001 Continental Storehouse Yes Old Troy Rd, Wappinger 2719.000002 House At Farmers Landing Yes Old Troy Rd, Wappinger 2719.000113 Crosby Gatehouse Yes Old Troy Rd, Wappinger 2719.000127 Carnwath Farms Historic Site No 81 Carnwath Farms Ln, Wappingers Falls 2719.000167 Edgehill / Rivercrest Rest Home No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000168 Suydam House Possible Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000194 Lot 522337 No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000195 Crosby Estate No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000196 Lot 537395 No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000197 Lot 547409 No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000198 Lots 563439 / 579467 No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000199 Lot 589487 No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.0002 Elmhurst No Wheeler Hill Rd, Wappinger 2719.000201 Obercreek No New Hamburg Rd, Wappinger

2744.000252 Wappingers Falls Historic District

2744.000022 Buckley Res 1-3 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000023 Patton Res 5-7 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000024 Herring Res 2-4 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000025 Derasmo Res 6-8 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2744.000026 Laffin Res 9-11 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000027 Galioto Res 10-12 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000028 Owenhinzmann Res 13-15 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000029 Martinez Res 14-16 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.00003 Adams Res 17-19 Dutchess Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000031 Komornik Res 2-4 Dutchess Terrace, Wappingers Falls 2744.000032 Sarubbi Res 6-8 Dutchess Terrace, Wappingers Falls 2744.000033 Selage Res 10-12 Dutchess Terrace, Wappingers Falls 2744.000034 Ranallo Res 14-16 Dutchess Terrace, Wappingers Falls 2744.000035 Buckley Res 18-20 Dutchess Terrace, Wappingers Falls 2744.000039 Commercial Bldg 5-7 Givens Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000046 Stone Bridge Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000047 Rockys Shoe Repair 1 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000048 Msgr. Loughlin Mem. Hall 2 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000049 Lemar Drugs 3 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.00005 Goring Hall/Purdy Comm. 5-7 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000052 2657 East Main Street 2657 East Main Street, Wappingers Falls 2744.000053 Wagon Wheel Pizza 10 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000054 Sal's Music Store 11 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000055 Colangelos Comm. Bldg. 12 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000056 Miller Comm. Bldg. 13 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000057 Brown Comm. Bldg. 14 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000058 Shuberts Comm. Bldg. 15 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000059 Lopez Oil Bldg. Grav 16 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.00006 Walker Comm. Bldg 17 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000061 Courtois Comm. Bldg 18 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000063 Meltzer Comm. Bldg. 20 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000065 Grinnell Library 26 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000066 United Methodist Church East Main, Wappingers Falls 2744.00007 Olde Millhouse/Szoty Oil Comm. Bldg. 8 West Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000071 Mecoreri Comm Bldg 10 West Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000081 Fulton Comm And Res 1 Market St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000083 Pettit Res 49 Market St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000084 Res 51a & 51b Market St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000085 Prussak Res 54 Market St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000086 Stephant Res 79 Market St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000117 Silver Commercial Bldg 6-14 Mill St, Wappingers Falls

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2744.000118 TOWN HALL, Ca. 1871 7 MILL ST, WAPPINGERS FALLS 2744.000122 Currier Res 4 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000123 Cruisie Residence 6 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000125 Dimarco Res 10 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000126 Dimarco Res 12 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000127 Bacchi Res 14 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000128 Mccloskey Res 16 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000129 Fulton Res 18 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.00013 Hunt Res 20 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000131 Lancto Res 22 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000144 Ioof Hall 6 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000145 Delanos Tavern 8 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000146 NY Telephone Bldg 10 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000147 Faller Res 11 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000148 Brannan Res 12 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000149 Kulla Res 14 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.00015 Lupert Res 15 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000151 Baller Res 16 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000152 Gurneg Res 18 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000153 Bethel Missionary Baptist Church 19 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000154 Clark Res 21 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000155 Van Burg Res 22 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000156 Doyle Res 24 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000157 Sowa Res 25-27 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000158 Mcclusky Res 28 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000159 Haines Res 29 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.00016 Dedomizio Comm Bldg 30 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000161 Unnamed 31 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000162 Delaney Res 32 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000164 Polichale Res 34 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000166 Decker Res 36 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000167 Knight Res 37 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000168 Hartman Comm 38 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000169 Gole Res 39 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.00017 Res 40 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000171 Shay Res 43 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000172 Res 44 South Ave, Wappingers Falls

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2744.000173 Wordell Res 45 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000174 Sutton Res 47 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000175 First Presbyterian Church 2570 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000176 Bain Res 49 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000177 Morrill Res 51 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000178 Dubinski Res 53 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000179 Kiss Res 55 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.00018 Kenney Res 57 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000181 Williams Res 59 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000182 Fulton Res 61 South Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.0002 Unnamed 1 Andrews Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000201 Unnamed 3 Andrews Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000202 Unnamed 7 Andrews Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000203 Unnamed 9 Andrews Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000204 Unnamed A Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000205 Unnamed B Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000206 Unnamed C Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000207 Unnamed D Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000208 Unnamed E Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000209 Unnamed F Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.00021 Unnamed G Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000211 Unnamed H Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000212 Unnamed I Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000213 Unnamed J Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000214 Unnamed K Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000215 Unnamed L Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000216 Unnamed M Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000217 Unnamed N Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000218 Unnamed O Dutchess Bleachery, Wappingers Falls 2744.000219 Unnamed 4-6 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.00022 Unnamed 19 East Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000221 Unnamed 1-3 Givens Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000222 Unnamed 13 Givens Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000223 Unnamed 16-18 Givens Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000224 Building Shed Givens Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000225 Unnamed 77 Market St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000226 Unnamed 81 Market St, Wappingers Falls

Table 4-C NRHP Listed Historic District Sites

USN Resource Address

2744.000227 Mesier Homestead Mesier Park, Wappingers Falls 2744.000228 Unnamed 8 Park St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000229 Zion Episcopal Church Satterlee Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.00023 Zion Church Parish Hall Satterlee Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000231 Zion Church Rectory Satterlee Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000232 Zion Church Park Satterlee Pl, Wappingers Falls 2744.000233 Unnamed 5-7 West Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000234 Unnamed 9 West Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000235 Unnamed 11-13 West Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000236 County Players Falls Theatre 15 West Main St, Wappingers Falls 2744.000237 Unnamed 2 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000238 Unnamed 4 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000239 Unnamed 6 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.00024 Unnamed 8 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000241 Unnamed 10 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000242 Unnamed 12 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000243 Unnamed 14 North Mesier Ave, Wappingers Falls 2744.000244 United States Post Office South Ave, Wappingers Falls

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility

2741.000073 Dumke Commercial 4.7 No 403 Main St Beacon 2741.000133 Bldg No. 1 3.5 No 18 Strack Dr Beacon 2741.000163 Wilson 4.7 No 39 North St Beacon 2741.000164 Eichorn Residence 4.7 No 40 North St Beacon 2741.000165 Mason Residence 4.7 No 48 North St Beacon 2741.000175 Mcnicol Residence 5.1 No 123 South Ave Beacon 868 Wolcott 2741.000198 Ormsbee Residence 5.1 No Ave Beacon 2741.000200 Groveville Mill Historic District 4.1 No Mill St Beacon 2741.000201 Bridge 4.1 No Front St Beacon 2741.000202 Groveville Mills; Beacon Textile 4.1 No Mason Circle Beacon 13 Groveville 2741.000203 Beacon Piece Dye 4.1 No Beacon Front St Groveville 2741.000204 Garage 4.1 No Beacon Front St 67 Groveville 2741.000205 Tenement 4.2 No Beacon Front St 2741.000206 Tenement 4.1 No 11 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000207 Tenement 4.1 No 30 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000208 Tenement 4.1 No 32 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000209 Tenement 4.1 No 34 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000210 Tenement 4.1 No 36 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000211 Tenement 4.1 No 38 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000212 Tenement 4.1 No 39 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000213 Tenement 4.1 No 41 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000214 Tenement 4.1 No 43 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000215 Tenement 4.1 No 45 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000216 Tenement 4.1 No 47 Lydia Dr Beacon 2741.000217 Tenement 4.1 No 4 Mill St Beacon 2741.000218 Tenement 4.1 No 8 Mill St Beacon 2741.000219 Tenement 4.1 No 3 Mill St Beacon 2741.000221 Historic District 4.7 No Upper Main St Beacon Willard H Mase Hook And Ladder Co 2741.000222 4.7 No Main St Beacon #1 2741.000223 Memorial Building 4.7 No 423 Main St Beacon 2741.000224 Stavros Commercial 4.7 No 394 Main St Beacon 2741.000225 Angelo Commercial 4.7 No 396 Main St Beacon 2741.000226 Roosa Commercial 4.7 No 398 Main St Beacon

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 2741.000227 Empire Nat. Bank 4.7 No 402 Main St Beacon 2741.000228 Prentis Commercial 4.7 No 412 Main St Beacon 2741.000229 Doughty Commercial 4.8 No 420 Main St Beacon 2741.000230 Melnyck Commercial 4.8 No 428 Main St Beacon 2741.000231 Hetling Commercial 4.8 No 432 Main St Beacon 2741.000232 Daltalri Res 4.8 No 438 Main St Beacon 2741.000233 Schuberts Commercial 4.8 No 440 Main St Beacon 2741.000234 Hudson Vally Saving Bank 4.8 No 444 Main St Beacon 2741.000235 Hudson Valley Savings And Loan 4.8 No 448 Main St Beacon 2741.000236 Pinter Commercial 4.8 No 456 Main St Beacon 2741.000237 Vilas Commercial 4.8 No 458 Main St Beacon 2741.000238 Mergar Commercial 4.8 No 460 Main St Beacon 2741.000239 Mer Gar Commercial 4.8 No 462 Main St Beacon 2741.000240 Salvation Army 4.8 No 464 Main St Beacon 2741.000241 Mazzone Plumbing And Heating Inc. 4.8 No 466 Main St Beacon 2741.000242 Kaputa Commercial 4.8 No 470 Main St Beacon 2741.000243 Deruishi Apts. 4.8 No 472 Main St Beacon 2741.000244 Vacant 4.8 No 476 Main St Beacon 2741.000245 Vacant 4.8 No 482 Main St Beacon 2741.000246 Leskow Commercial 4.8 No 486 Main St Beacon 2741.000247 Walsh Commercial 4.8 No 492 Main St Beacon 2741.000248 Vacant 4.8 No 498 Main St Beacon 2741.000249 Chobian Commercial 4.8 No 504 Main St Beacon 2741.000250 Schurr Commercial 4.8 No 512 Main St Beacon 2741.000251 Regers Apts 4.8 No 514 Main St Beacon 2741.000252 Rogers Apts 4.8 No 518 Main St Beacon 2741.000253 Schurr Commercial 4.8 No 526 Main St Beacon 2741.000254 Mozeyko Commercial 4.7 No 536 Main St Beacon 2741.000255 Datels Apts 4.7 No 546 Main St Beacon 2741.000256 Vacant 4.7 No 548 Main St Beacon 2741.000257 Way Commercial 4.7 No 560 Main St Beacon 2741.000258 Beacon Municipal Bldg. 4.8 No 427 Main St Beacon 2741.000259 Telephone Company 4.8 No 439 Main St Beacon 2741.000260 Beacon Theatre 4.8 No 449 Main St Beacon 2741.000261 Rivera Commercial 4.8 No 451 Main St Beacon 2741.000262 Costa Commercial 4.8 No 453 Main St Beacon 2741.000263 Angelo Commercial 4.8 No 455 Main St Beacon 2741.000264 Johns Tailor Shop 4.8 No 457 Main St Beacon

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 2741.000265 Police Dept. 4.8 No 463 Main St Beacon 2741.000266 Kuka Commercial 4.8 No 467 Main St Beacon 2741.000267 Pucino Commercial 4.8 No 471 Main St Beacon 2741.000268 Lau Commercial 4.8 No 473 Main St Beacon 2741.000269 Batt Commercial 4.8 No 475 Main St Beacon 2741.000270 Matteawan Methodist Church 4.9 No 483 Main St Beacon 2741.000271 Old Train Station 4.8 No 493 Main St Beacon Matteawan Company Factory 2741.000272 4.8 No 1 East Main St Beacon Complex I, National Felt 2741.000273 Unnamed 4.8 No 15 East Main St Beacon 2741.000274 Mcmillan Apts 4.8 No 17 East Main St Beacon 2741.000275 Peratikos Commercial 4.8 No 23 East Main St Beacon 2741.000276 Vacant 4.8 No 25 East Main St Beacon 2741.000277 Minacapelli Commercial 4.8 No 31 East Main St Beacon 2741.000278 Skelly Apts 4.8 No 33 East Main St Beacon 2741.000279 Vacant 4.9 No 37 East Main St Beacon 2741.000280 Vacant 4.8 No 2 East Main Beacon 2741.000281 Gerlimann Finishing 4.8 No 10 East Main St Beacon 2741.000282 Mcmillan Commercial 4.8 No 18 East Main Beacon 2741.000283 Apts 4.8 No 18 South St Beacon 2741.000284 Zietler Residence 4.8 No 30 South St Beacon 2741.000362 Bin 1006340 Cooperation Bridge 4.5 No Ny 9d Beacon 2741.000418 Unnamed 4.7 No 2 Ackerman St Beacon 2741.000419 Unnamed 4.9 No 2 Churchill St Beacon 2741.000420 Unnamed 4.9 No 4 Churchill St Beacon 2741.000421 Unnamed 4.9 No 5 Churchill St Beacon 2741.000422 Unnamed 4.9 No 6 Churchill St Beacon 2741.000423 Unnamed 4.9 No 11 Creek Drive Beacon 2741.000424 Unnamed 4.9 No 28 Creek Drive Beacon 2741.000425 Unnamed 4.7 No 1 Davis St Beacon 2741.000426 Unnamed 4.8 No 1 East Main St Beacon 2741.000427 Unnamed 4.8 No 2 East Main St Beacon Matteawan Company Factory 2741.000428 4.8 No 7 East Main St Beacon Complex 2741.000429 Unnamed 4.8 No 9 East Main St Beacon 2741.000430 Unnamed 4.8 No 15 East Main St Beacon 2741.000431 Unnamed 4.8 No 20 East Main St Beacon 2741.000432 Unnamed 4.8 No 4 Locust Pl Beacon 2741.000433 Unnamed 4.7 No 392 Main St Beacon

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 2741.000434 Unnamed 4.7 No 404 Main St Beacon 2741.000435 Unnamed 4.7 No 416 Main St Beacon 2741.000436 Unnamed 4.7 No 423 Main St Beacon 2741.000437 Unnamed 4.8 No 428 Main St Beacon 2741.000438 Unnamed 4.7 No 425 Main St Beacon 2741.000439 Unnamed 4.8 No 433 Main St Beacon 2741.000440 Unnamed 4.8 No 443 Main St Beacon 2741.000441 Unnamed 4.8 No 452 Main St Beacon 2741.000442 Unnamed 4.8 No 457 Main St Beacon 2741.000443 Unnamed 4.8 No 459 Main St Beacon 2741.000444 Unnamed 4.8 No 470 Main St Beacon 2741.000445 Unnamed 4.8 No 488 Main St Beacon 2741.000446 Unnamed 4.8 No 498 Main St Beacon 2741.000447 Unnamed 4.8 No 504 Main St Beacon 2741.000448 Unnamed 4.8 No 517 Main St Beacon 2741.000449 Unnamed 4.8 No 534 Main St Beacon 2741.000450 Unnamed 4.7 No 536 Main St Beacon 2741.000451 Unnamed 4.7 No 544 Main St Beacon 2741.000452 Unnamed 4.7 No 550 Main St Beacon 2741.000453 Unnamed 4.6 No 578 Main St Beacon 2741.000454 Unnamed 4.8 No 5 North St Beacon 2741.000455 Unnamed 4.8 No 9 North St Beacon 2741.000456 Unnamed 4.8 No 10 North St Beacon 2741.000457 Unnamed 4.8 No 11 North St Beacon 2741.000458 Unnamed 4.8 No 12 North St Beacon 2741.000459 Unnamed 4.8 No 16 North St Beacon 2741.000460 Unnamed 4.7 No 17 North St Beacon 2741.000461 Unnamed 4.8 No 18 North St Beacon 2741.000462 Unnamed 4.7 No 19 North St Beacon 2741.000463 Unnamed 4.7 No 21 North St Beacon 2741.000464 Unnamed 4.7 No 32 North St Beacon 2741.000465 Unnamed 4.7 No 44 North St Beacon 2741.000466 Unnamed 4.7 No 47 North St Beacon 2741.000467 Unnamed 4.7 No 51 North St Beacon 2741.000468 Unnamed 4.7 No 55 North St Beacon 27 Schenck 2741.000469 Unnamed 4.7 No Beacon Ave 2741.000470 Unnamed 4.8 No 5 South St Beacon

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 2741.000471 Unnamed 4.8 No 9 South St Beacon 2741.000472 Unnamed 4.8 No 10 South St Beacon 2741.000473 Unnamed 4.8 No 14 South St Beacon 2741.000474 Unnamed 4.8 No 15 South St Beacon 2741.000475 Unnamed 4.8 No 16 South St Beacon 2741.000476 Unnamed 4.8 No 17 South St Beacon 2741.000477 Unnamed 4.8 No 18 South St Beacon 2741.000478 Unnamed 4.8 No 21 South St Beacon 2741.000479 Unnamed 4.8 No 27 South St Beacon 2741.000480 Unnamed 4.8 No 32 South St Beacon 2741.000481 Unnamed 4.8 No 34 South St Beacon 2741.000482 Unnamed 4.7 No 37 South St Beacon 2741.000483 Unnamed 4.7 No 48 South St Beacon 2741.000484 Unnamed 4.9 No 2 Tioranda Ave Beacon 2741.000485 Unnamed 4.8 No 5 Tioranda Ave Beacon 12 Tioranda 2741.000486 Unnamed 4.9 No Beacon Ave 15 Tioranda 2741.000487 Unnamed 4.9 No Beacon Ave 31 Van Nydeck 2741.000488 Unnamed 4.8 No Beacon Ave 2741.000501 18 Strack Drive 3.5 No 18 Strack Dr Beacon 2741.000539 Groveville MILLS: Building 9 4.1 No Mason Circle Beacon 07103.000025 Uniited Methodist Church 9.8 No Main St Cornwall

07103.000110 Hillside 9.4 No 60 Duncan Ave Cornwall Old Glenham 2706.000058 Former Texaco Research Center 4.0 No Fishkill Rd Breakneack Uptake Chamber (Aka 2706.000075 4.2 No 9D Fishkill Hudson River Drainage Chamber) 2706.000079 Fishkill Rural Cemetery 3.8 No 801 US 9 Fishkill 2706.000080 Dubois Chapel 3.8 No 801 US 9 Fishkill 2706.000081 Gate house / office 3.8 No 801 US 9 Fishkill 2745.000119 Fishkill Elementary School 4.1 No 20 Church St Fishkill 184 OLD POST 11109.00002 Unnamed 0.8 No Marlborough RD 11109.00002 Unnamed 2.0 No 1220 US 9W Marlborough 11109.00002 CHURCH 2.1 No 1211 US 9W Marlborough 11109.00002 Unnamed 2.1 No 1217 US 9W Marlborough 11109.00002 Unnamed 2.1 No 1223 US 9W Marlborough

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 11109.00006 Farm with Farmerette [Camp Young] 2.7 No 18 Birdsall Ave Marlborough 7114.000126 THAYER HOUSE 3.9 No 5091 US 9W Newburgh 7114.000127 BALMVILLE SCHOOL 3.6 No US 9W Newburgh 148_ Attwood 7114.000133 Unnamed 3.8 No Newburgh Ln 7114.000207 Farmhouse And Barn 1.2 No 5495 Us 9w Newburgh 51 Old Post 7114.000208 Residence (Bungalow) And Barn 1.0 No Newburgh Road 7114.000209 Vernacular Farmhouse 1.7 No River Rd Newburgh 7114.000210 Our Lady Of Mercy RC Church 0.6 No 977 River Road Newburgh 125 Old Post 7114.000238 Residence, Barn, Privy 0.8 No Newburgh Road 7140.000002 Unnamed 5.7 No 300 Broadway City Of Newburgh Newburgh Steam Mills (Regal Bag 7140.000006 4.7 Yes 300 Water St City Of Newburgh Company) 7140.002435 Unnamed 5.0 No 95 Gidney Ave City Of Newburgh South William City Of Newburgh No 7140.002423 Unnamed 5.8 St 7140.002429 Unnamed 5.6 No 424 First St City Of Newburgh 7140.002482 Unnamed 5.5 No 105 Liberty City Of Newburgh 301 Robinson 7140.002483 Nfa North (North Junior High School) 4.9 No City of Newburgh Avenue 320 Powell 7140.002585 Mount St. Mary's 4.9 No City of Newburgh Avenue 63 Monument 7140.00249 Unnamed 6.0 No City Of Newburgh Street 7140.002495 Unnamed 5.4 No 3 Bennett St City Of Newburgh 7140.002496 Unnamed 5.5 No 7 Bush Ave City Of Newburgh 7140.002497 Unnamed 5.5 No 17 Bush Ave City Of Newburgh 7140.002498 Unnamed 5.4 No 21 Bush Ave City Of Newburgh 7140.002499 Unnamed 5.4 No 25 Bush Ave City Of Newburgh 7140.0025 Unnamed 5.4 No 29 Bush Ave City Of Newburgh 7140.002501 Unnamed 5.4 No 35 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002502 Unnamed 5.5 No 10 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002503 Unnamed 5.5 No 18 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002504 Unnamed 5.5 No 22 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002505 Unnamed 5.4 No 26 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002506 Unnamed 5.4 No 30 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002507 Unnamed 5.4 No 32 Bush Ave City of Newburgh 7140.002508 Unnamed 5.4 No 3 Farrell Street City of Newburgh

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 7140.002509 Unnamed 5.4 No 7 Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.00251 Unnamed 5.4 No 11 Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002511 Unnamed 5.4 No 15 Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002512 Unnamed 5.4 No 19 Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002513 Unnamed 5.4 No 23 Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002514 Unnamed 5.5 No 4B Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002515 Unnamed 5.5 No 4B Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002516 Unnamed 5.4 No 12B Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002517 Unnamed 5.4 No 16B Farrell St City of Newburgh 7140.002518 Unnamed 5.4 No 20B Farrell St City of Newburgh 111 Fullerton 7140.002519 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 121 Fullerton 7140.00252 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 127 Fullerton 7140.002521 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 135 Fullerton 7140.002522 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 141 Fullerton 7140.002523 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 161 Fullerton 7140.002524 Unnamed 5.4 No City of Newburgh St 171 Fullerton 7140.002525 Unnamed 5.4 No City of Newburgh St 124 Fullerton 7140.002526 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 136 Fullerton 7140.002527 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 142 Fullerton 7140.002528 Unnamed 5.5 No City of Newburgh St 166 Fullerton City of Newburgh No 7140.002529 Unnamed 5.4 St 7140.00253 Unnamed 5.4 No 9 Lilly St City of Newburgh 7140.002531 Unnamed 5.4 No 17 Lilly St City of Newburgh 7140.002532 Unnamed 5.4 No 4 Lilly St City of Newburgh 7140.002533 Unnamed 5.4 No 6 Lilly St City of Newburgh 7140.002534 Unnamed 5.4 No 12 Lilly St City of Newburgh 7140.002535 Unnamed 5.4 No 7 McKinstry St City of Newburgh 7140.002536 Unnamed 5.4 No 3 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002537 Unnamed 5.4 No 7 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002538 Unnamed 5.4 No 11 Norton St City of Newburgh

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 7140.002539 Unnamed 5.4 No 13A Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.00254 Unnamed 5.4 No 15 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002541 Unnamed 5.4 No 19B Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002542 Unnamed 5.4 No 8 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002543 Unnamed 5.4 No 10 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002544 Unnamed 5.4 No 12 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002545 Unnamed 5.4 No 16 Norton St City of Newburgh 7140.002546 Unnamed 5.4 No 20B Norton St City of Newburgh 169 Prospect 7140.002547 Unnamed 5.3 No City of Newburgh St 175 Prospect 7140.002548 Unnamed 5.3 No City of Newburgh St 179 Prospect 7140.002549 Unnamed 5.3 No City of Newburgh St 7140.00255 Unnamed 5.5 No 344 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002551 Unnamed 5.5 No 348 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002552 Unnamed 5.5 No 352 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002553 Unnamed 5.5 No 356 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002554 Unnamed 5.5 No 360 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002555 Unnamed 5.5 No 364 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002557 Unnamed 5.5 No 368 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002558 Unnamed 5.5 No 370 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.002559 Unnamed 5.5 No 388 Third St City of Newburgh 7140.00256 Unnamed 5.3 No 8 Wilson St City of Newburgh 7140.002561 Unnamed 5.3 No 14 Wilson St City of Newburgh 07115.00000 John Nicoll House 6.3 No 44 US 9W New Windsor Thomas E Mcdowell House South South Jackson 07115.000045 7.1 No New Windsor Jackson Ave Ave Furdeen Mcfadden House Wood South Jackson 07115.000047` 7.1 No New Windsor Residence South Jackson Ave Ave James Mcdowell House South South Jackson 07115.000048 7.1 No New Windsor Jackson Ave Ave 07115.000656 36 6.3 No 34-36 US 9W New Windsor 07115.000664 Unnamed 6.3 No US 9W New Windsor 07115.000235 Sayre Mcgregor House 7.1 No New Windsor New Windsor 07115.000720 Mill Complex 20 Acres 6.3 No 361 Walsh Ave New Windsor 309 Old 2719.000169 Cooper Shook House 4.1 No Wappinger Hopewell Rd 47 Spook Hill 2719.000218 C. 1812 Farmhouse And Dutch Barn 4.1 No Wappinger Rd

Table 4-D Eligible Historic Sites Distance Potential USN Resource Address Town (Miles) Visibility 225 River Rd 2719.000223 Farmhouse 0.9 No Wappinger North 2719.000238 Residence 3.6 No 3 Losee Road Wappinger 30 Major 2719.000222 Wappingers Junior High School 2.7 No Macdonald Wappingers Falls Way 2744.000135 Boldrin Res 3.1 No 30 Remsen Ave Wappingers Falls 43 Remsen 2744.000136 Ffoley Res 3.0 No Wappingers Falls Ave 48 Remsen 2744.000137 Coulter Res 3.0 No Wappingers Falls Ave 1406 Route 11109.00000 Col. Lewis Dubois House 2.8 No Wappingers Falls 9W 384 Bingham 11109.00001 Birdsall House/Polhamus Farm 3.1 No Wappingers Falls Rd

DANSKAMMER ENERGY CENTER ARTICLE 10 EXHIBIT 24

OUTREACH CORRESPONDENCE

ATTACHMENT 8 ,RECEIVED 650 Suffolk St .. Suite 200 T 978.970.5600 PUBLIC SERVICft.owell MA 01854 TRCcompanies.com C0HHISSI0H ' EXEC-FILF -. t. qA ►lY

August 28, 2019 2019 AUG 34 PH I: 20

Kathleen Burgess Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 Albany, NY 12223

Subject: Visual Impact Survey Request- Danskammer Energy Center

Dear Ms. Burgess:

As you may be aware, Danskammer Energy, LLC is proposing to repower its existing nameplate 532 megawatt (MW) generating facility site located in the Town of Newburgh, New York with a state-of-the-art natural gas fired combined cycle power generation facility. The Project is subject to Article 10 of the New York Public Service Law (PSL), which governs the siting of major electric generating facilities in New York. In accordance with the Article 10 regulations, a Public Involvement Program (PIP) plan for this Project was filed in July 2018 and a Preliminary Scoping Statement (PSS) was filed in February 2019. Both documents are available on the Project's website, https://danskammerenergy.com. Please refer to the PIP and PSS for additional details regarding the proposed Project.

In accordance with the Article 10 regulations, and as described in the PIP and PSS, Danskammer, through its consultant, TRC, is conducting a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) for the proposed Project, which will be included in Application Exhibit 24 (Visual Impacts). The VIA will, in part, identify sensitive resource areas susceptible to visual changes from the proposed Project and present photographic simulations of the proposed Project's facilities in relation to selected viewpoints. The VIA will also be conducted in conjunction with the analysis that will be performed for Application Exhibit 20 (Cultural Resources), which takes into account sites or structures listed in or eligible for listing in the National or State Register of Historic Places (NRHP/SRHP) .

Preliminary visual analyses and site investigations are in progress. The progress report on the VIA is available on the Project's website for stakeholder review and comment at https://danskammerenergy.com. It provides an overview of the work that has been done to date on the VIA including the status of visualization studies, site visits, preliminary analyses, and background information on the VIA process.

The i__nformation pr~sented in this letter and the progress report available on the Project's website is intended to (i) provide a summary of the extent and findings of the preliminary visual analyses thus far, (ii) request input from municipal planning, local historic groups, state agencies and other visual stakeholders in identifying any additional sensitive visual resources important to the community within the Project's visual study area, which includes a 5-mile radius from the Project facility, and (iii) provide an opportunity to suggest additional representative and reasonable candidate locations for photo-simulations (before and after depictions of the Project) in areas of concern and with public access.

We are reaching out to you to request your assistance in identifying the visually sensitive resources to be included in the VIA available on the Project's website. Please review the inventory of visual resources in Table 1 of the Progress Report for completeness. Please also review the photolog in Attachment 3 as well as photo viewpoint locations in Attachment 2 figures of the Progress Report.

If you feel that the identified visual resources and candidate viewpoints provide an adequate representation of the Project for the purposes of preparing the VIA, no further action on your part is necessary. However, if there are other public locations of concern, currently not depicted, where you would like to suggest that additional representative photos be taken, or if there are any additional visual resources that are important to note, please provide your comments or feedback, with an explanation of why you feel that location/viewpoint should be included.

Any comments or feedback you may have are requested by September 25, 2019 and should be sent to the following:

• Via email to Judy Bartos: [email protected] • Via email to Kaitlin McCormick: [email protected]

Thank you for your attention to this request. We appreciate your input and assistance identifying significant sensitive visual areas.

Best regards,

Judy Bartos, Visualization Specialist TRC Companies, Inc. VISUAL STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH MAILING LIST

Recipient Position Address Town Zip

Hon. Gilbert J. Piaquadio Town Supervisor 1496 Route 300 Newburgh 12550 Hon. Andrew Zarutskie Town Clerk 1496 Route 300 Newburgh 12550 Gerald Canfield Code Compliance Supervisor 308 Gardnertown Road Newburgh 12550 John P. Ewasutyn Chairman 308 Gardnertown Road Newburgh 12550 Hon. Scott Manley Town Councilman/Deputy Supe1496 Route 300 Newburgh 12550 Kenneth Mennerich Vice Chair 308 Gardnertown Road Newburgh 12550 Hon. Steven M. Neuhaus County Executive 40 Matthews Street Goshen 10924 Hon. Annie Rabbitt Orance County Clerk 255 Main St. Goshen 10924 David E. Church Planning Commissioner 124 Main Street Goshen 10924 Kevin Sumner District Manager 225 Dolson Avenue, Suite 103 Middletown 10940 Laurie Villasuso Chief Operating Officer 4 Crotty Lane, Suite 100 New Windsor 12553 Hon. L. Stephen Brescia Chairman 255 Main Street Goshen 10924 Hon. Michael D. Paduch Minority Leader 255 Main Street Goshen 10924 Hon. Michael Amo Independence Party leader 255 Main Street Goshen 10924 Hon. Kate Bonelli Majority Leader 255 Main Street Goshen 10924 Hon. Pat Ryan County Executive 244 Fair Street Kingston 12401 Hon. Adele Reiter Deputy County Executive 244 Fair Street Kingston 12401 Nina Postupack County Clerk 244 Fair Street Kingston 12401 Thomas Jackson Commissioner 313-317 Shamrock Lane Kingston 12401 Hon. Alphonso Lanzetta Town Supervisor 21 Milton Turnpike, Suite 200 Milton 12547 Colleen Corcoran Town Clerk 21 Milton Turnpike, Suite 200 Milton 12547 Hon. Marcus J. Molinaro County Executive 22 Market Street Poughkeepsie 12601 Bradford Kendall County Clerk 22 Market Street Poughkeepsie 12601 Hon. Richard Thurston Town Supervisor 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls 12590 Joseph P. Paoloni Town Clerk 20 Middlebush Road Wappingers Falls 12590 Hon. Jon J. Baisley Town Supervisor 1 Overocker Road Poughkeepsie 12603 Felicia Salvatore Town Clerk 1 Overocker Road Poughkeepsie 12603 Hon. Robert LaColla Supervisor 807 Route 52 Fishkill 12524 Becki Tompkins Town Clerk 807 Route 52 Fishkill 12524 Hon. Matt Alexander Mayor 2582 South Avenue Wappingers Falls 12590

Page 1 John Karge Village Clerk 2582 South Avenue Wappingers Falls 12590 Kathleen Burgess Secretary Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 Albany 12223 James Denn Public Information Officer Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 Albany 12223 John Rhodes Chairman Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 Albany 12223 John Sipos Acting General Counsel Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 Albany 12223 Lorna Gillings Outreach Contact Empire State Plaza, Agency Building 3 Albany 12223 Heather Behnke, Esq Assistant Counsel 3 Empire State Plaza Albany 12223 Jay Goodman, Esq. Assistant Counsel 3 Empire State Plaza Albany 12223 Michael Higgins Outreach Contact 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany 12233 Sita Crounse Senior Attorney 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany 12233 Judith Abbott Corning Tower, Room 1772 Albany 12237 Michael Phillips Corning Tower, Room 1772 Albany 12237 Daniel Whitehead Director 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany 12233 Basil Seggos Commissioner 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany 12233 Kelly Turturro Regional Director 21 South Putt Corners Road New Paltz 12561 Rose Harvey Commissioner P.O. Box 189 Waterford 12188 Lucy R. Waletzky Chair P.O. Box 308 Staatsburg 12580 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservati 625 Broadway Albany 12207 Paul A. Karas Acting Commisioner 50 Wolf Road Albany 12232 Lance McMillan, P.E. Acting Regional Director 4 Burnett Boulevard Poughkeepsie 12603 Joanne M. Mahoney Chair P. O. Box 189 Albany 12201-0189 Richard Ball Commissioner 10B Airline Drive Albany 12235 Matthew Driscoll Acting Executive Director P. O. Box 189 Albany 12201-0189 Richard L. Kaufmann Board Chairman 17 Columbia Circle Albany 12203-6399 Alicia Barton President & CEO 17 Columbia Circle Albany 12203-6399 Meghan Taylor Director Mid Hudson region 33 Airport Center Drive, Suite 201 New Windsor 12553 Heather Gierloff Reserve Manager P. O. Box 315 Staatsburg 12580 Howard Zemsky President & CEO 633 Third Avenue, 37th Floor New York 10017 Howard Zemsky Commissioner 95 Perry Street, Suite 500 Buffalo 14203 Rossana Rosado Secretary of State 99 Washington Avenue Albany 12231-0001 Laura McLean Outreach Contact 41 State Street Albany 12231 Howard A. Zucker Commissioner of Health Corning Tower Albany 12237 Thomas Richard Assistant Counsel Corning Tower Albany 12237 Letitia James Attorney General State Capital Building Albany 12224

Page 2 Vincent Sapienza Acting Commissioner 59-17 Junction Boulevard Flushing 11373 RoAnn Destito Commissioner Corning Tower, 41st Floor Albany 12233 Barnabas McHenry Chairman 625 Broadway, 4th Floor Albany 12207 Mark Sanza Counsel 625 Broadway, 14th Floor Albany 12233-1750 Hon. Andrew Cuomo Governor New York State Capitol Building Albany 12224 Heather Gierloff Reserve Manager P. O. Box 315 Staatsburg 12580 Michael Saviola, MPS Associate Environmental Analys1530 Jefferson Road Rochester 14623 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District 26 Federal Plaza, Room 1937 New York 10278-0090 David Stilwell 3817 Luker Road Cortland 13045 National Telecommunications and Information Administration ( Herbert C. Hoover Building (HCHB) Washington D.C. 20230 Steven J. Sample Mission Evaluation Branch 3400 Defense Pentagon, Room 5C646 Washington D.C. 10310 Jennifer Solomon Eastern Region Regional Admin 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica 11434 Bob Radliff Canalway Heritage Corridor AdmP. O. Box 12188 Waterford 12188 Gay Vietzke Regional Director, Northeast Re200 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor Philadelphia 19106 Captain Michael Day Sector Commander 212 Coast Guard Drive Staten Island 10305 Michael Pentony Regional Administrator 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester 1930 Javier Laureano Director 200 Broadway New York 10007-1866 Hon. Charles E. Schumer Senate Minority Leader 11A Clinton Avenue, Room 420 Albany 12207 Hon. Kirsten E. Gillibrand U.S. Senator from New York 11A Clinton Avenue, Room 821 Albany 12207 Hon. Jonathan G. Jacobson Assemblymember – 104th Distr 154 North Plank Road, Suite 2 Newburgh 12550 Hon. Kieran Lalor Assemblymember – 105th Distr North Hopewell Plaza, Suite 1 Hopewell Junction 12533 Hon. Didi Barrett Assemblymember – 106th Distr 12 Raymond Avenue, Suite 105 Poughkeepsie 12603 Hon. James Skoufis New York State Senator – 39th 1093 Little Britain Road New Windsor 12553 Hon. Sean Patrick Maloney Member of Congress – District 1123 Grand Street, 2nd Floor Newburgh 12550 Hon. Susan J. Serino New York State Senator, 41st D 4254 Albany Post Road Hyde Park 12538 Mark Hall Highway Superintendent 90 Gardnertown Road Newburgh 12550 Erik Denega Commissioner P. O. Box 509 Goshen 10924 Robert H. Balkind Commissioner 626 Dutchess Turnpike Poughkeepsie 12603 Thomas Jackson Commissioner 313-317 Shamrock Lane Kingston 12401 Dr. Roberto Padilla Superintendent 124 Grand Street Newburgh 12550 Michael M. Brooks Superintendent of Schools 21 Milton Turnpike, Suite 100 Milton 12547 Dr. Kathleen Farrell Interim Superintendent of Scho 11 College Avenue Poughkeepsie 12603 Jose L. Carrion Superintendent of Schools P. O. Box 396 Hopewell Junction 12533 Terry Ahlers Acting Chief 22 Grand Street Newburgh 12550

Page 3 Carl E. Dubois Sheriff 110 Wells Farm Road Goshen 10924 New York State Police – Troop T 1311 Route 300 Newburgh 12550 Brendan Casey Orange County Office of Emerge22 Wells Farm Road Goshen 10924 Roger L. Parrino, Sr. Commissioner State Office Campus Building 7A Albany 12241 Gerald Canfield Emergency Coordinator 300 Gardnertown Road Newburgh 12550 Charles A. Freni President and CEO 284 South Avenue Poughkeepsie 12601 Carl A. Taylor President 89 East Avenue Rochester 14649 Ave M. Bie Board Chair 10 Krey Boulevard Rensselaer 12144 Gil Quiniones President and CEO 123 Main Street White Plains 10601-3170 Time Warner Cable 1279 New York 300 Newburgh 12550 Verizon 52 Route 17K Newburgh 12550 Michael Bemis Director 10 Krey Boulevard Rensselaer 12144 Hayley Carlock Director of Environmental AdvoOne Civic Center Plaza-Suite 200 Poughkeepsie 12601 Paul Gallay President 20 Secor Road Ossining 10562 Scott Keller Acting Executive Director 625 Broadway – 4th Floor Albany 12207 Manna Jo Greene Environmental Director 724 Wolcott Avenue Beacon 12508 Christopher Reed President P. O. Box 326 Hudson 12534 Rebecca M. Seaman Chairman, Board of Directors P. O. Box 1384289 Route 82 Millbrook 12545 The Nature Conservancy 195 New Karner Road – Suite 200 Albany 12205 Ben Schneeberg President P. O. Box 1286 Warwick 10990 Leeanne Thornton Acting President P. O. Box 589 Saugerties 12477 Christine DeBoer Executive Director P. O. Box 208 New Paltz 12561 Bob Heinemann Chair P. O. Box 1012 Poughkeepsie 12602 David Pell Chairman P. O. Box 1982 Poughkeepsie 12601 Nancy Berner Chairman P. O. Box 226 Garrison 10524 Michael Vanacore Board President 5468 Route 9W North Newburgh 12550 Peter Gonzalez President P. O. Box 3281355 S. William Street Newburgh 12550 Stony Kill Foundation 79 Farmstead Lane Wappingers Falls 12590 Steve Olsen Director 855 Sheafe Road Wappingers Falls 12590 Catherine Rinaldi President 420 Lexington Avenue New York 10170 Richard Anderson President & CEO 1 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington 20001 EarthJustice 48 Wall Street – 19th Floor New York 10005 Kenneth S. Panza Member-at-Large 33 Shotwell Road Woodstock 12498 Our Lady of Mercy P. O. Box 730 Marlboro 12542

Page 4 Fire Chief 5172 Route 9W Newburgh 12551 Chairman 5172 Route 9W Newburgh 12551 Sandra Kissam 1261 Union Avenue Newburgh 12550 Robert Kaehler 27 West Street Newburgh 12550 New York State Department of State Oﬃce of Planning and DeveOne Commerce Plaza-Suite 101099 W Albany 12231 Richard Webster 20 Secor Road Ossining 10562 Ed Harrison General Manager 1180 1st Street New Windsor 12553 Stewart Air National Guard 1 Maguire Way Newburgh 12550 Robert Balkind Commissioner 263 New Hackensack Road Wappingers Falls 12590 DANSKAMMER ENERGY, LLC 994 River Road Newburgh 12550 Property Owner 2200 Atlantic Street – Suite 800 Newburgh 12550 Property Owner 17 Danskammer Road Newburgh 12550 Property Owner P. O. Box 1357 New Britain 6050 Property Owner 500 Water Street (C910) Jacksonville 32202 Property Owner 284 South Avenue Poughkeepsie 12602 Property Owner 500 Water Street Jacksonville 32202 Property Owner P. O. Box 730 Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 5468 Route 9W North Newburgh 12550 Property Owner 60 Old Post Road Newburgh 12550 Property Owner 89 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 95 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 4 Camelot Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 14 Camelot Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 12 Camelot Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 5 Camelot Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 18 Camelot Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 134 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 130 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 120 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 114 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 104 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 102 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 141 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 128 Sunflower Circle Wappingers Falls 12590

Page 5 Property Owner 1 Christopher Way Marlboro 12542 Property Owner P. O. Box 142 Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 117 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 2 Christopher Way Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 15 McDonald Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 7 McDonald Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 143 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 1 McDonald Drive Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 153 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 16 Hilltop Circle Fishkill 12524 Property Owner 14 Curtin Lane Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 18 Curtin Lane Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 15 Curtin Lane Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 1 Flemming Drive Newburgh 12550 Property Owner 6 Curtin Lane Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 195 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 187 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner P. O. Box 2026 Poughkeepsie 12601 Property Owner 108 Burnt Meadow Road Gardiner 12525 Property Owner 211 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 181 Old Post Road Marlboro 12542 Property Owner 43 South Street Marlboro 12542 Albert Butzel Counsel for National Resources 1125 Park Ave. Apt. 9E New York 10001 John Dax Counsel 54 State Street, Suite 805 Albany 12207 Duane Duclaux Deputy General Counsel 2200 Atlantic Street, Suite 800 Stamford 06902 Mark Taylor Attorney 655 Little Britain Road New Windsor 12553 William Reid CEO 994 River Road Newburgh 12550 Lisa Perfetto 48 Wall Street, 15th Floor New York 10005 Allan Page Principal 9 Vassar Street, Suite 30 Poughkeepsie 12601 Raghu Murthy Staff Attorney 48 Wall Street, 15th Floor New York 10005 Melissa Legge Associate Attorney 48 Wall Street, 15th Floor New York 10005 Sean Moran Researcher 668 Wemple Road Glenmont 12077 Marc Lawlor Sr. Project Manager 1200 Wall Street West, 5th Floor Lyndhurst 07071 Michael Keller Principal 1200 Wall Street West, 5th Floor Lyndhurst 07071

Page 6 Jeremy Kaufman Office of Corporation Counsel 83 Broadway, 2nd Floor Newburgh 12550 Michelle Hook V.P. of Public Affairs 994 River Road Newburgh 12550 Patrick Hines Principal 33 Airport Center Drive, Suite 202 New Windsor 12553 Roger Higgins 49 Point Street Wappingers Falls 12590-5531 Ed Hall 994 River Road Newburgh 12550 Destiny Sessums 1042 Hillsborough Chase Nw Kennesaw 30144 Edward J. Goff 4 Burnett Boulevard Poughkeepsie 12603 Gail Moran 6 Lori St. Poughkeepsie NY 12603 12603 Robert Wright 95 Beekman Ave. Apt. #19H Sleepy Hollow 10591 Thomas M. Reed 21 Alta Drive Newburgh 12550 Kieran Conroy PO Box 341 Central Valley 10917 James Smith 3348 Route 203 Campbell Hall 10916 Jared and Jessica Seager 143 Oak St. Newburgh 12550 Christopher McCracken 3348 Route 208 Campbell Hall 10916 John Gaffney 994 River Road Newburgh 12550 Joe Brophy 750 River Road Newburgh 12550 Andrea DiNitto 116 Frozen Ridge Rd Newburgh 12550 Laura McLean One Commerce Plaza, Suite 1010 Albany 12231 Robert Kaehler 27 West St Newburgh 12550 Seed Record 150 State St., 4th Floor Albany 12207 Dennis Keough 10 Cabot Road Medford 2155 John Gaffney 994 River Road Newburgh 12550 Sean Moran 688 Wemple Road Glenmont 12207 Kieran Conroy PO Box 341 Central Valley 10917 Aidan Synder Program Manager 230 Washington Ave Ext Albany 12208 Anibal Scuadroni 255 Pinebrook Dr. Hyde Park 121538 Julie Shirashi 123 E. Willow St. Beacon 12508 Bob LaColla 807 Route 52 Fishkill 12524 Jenna Chippendale 123 Grand St, 2nd Floor Newburgh 12550 Steve Seymour 19 Briarwood Drive Wappingers Fall 12590 Chris McCracken 3348 Route 208 Campbell Hall 10916 Jeff May 21 North Drive Red Hook 12571 Regina Klein 52 Pasture Lane Poughkeepsie 12603 Jennifer Dering 400 Columbus Ave Valhalla 10595

Page 7 David Cullen P.O. Box 420 Hughsouville 12537 George Hemroth 36 Hackensack Heights Rd Wappingers Falls 12590 Joey Cavaccini 20 Middlebush Rd Wappinger 12590 Scott Manley 1496 Route 300 Newburgh 12550 Pamela LaLonde 314 Carter Ave Newburgh 12550 Bill Conyen 776 River Road Newburgh 12550 Debra Meccia-Hall 70 Holmes Road Newburgh 12550 Tara Vamos 6 Rock St. Cold Spring 10516 Carlos Valle 11 Main St. Chester 10918 Jurgen Wekerle P.O. Box 287 Walden 12586 Kathryn Milian 2810 Snake Hill Rd. New Windsor 12553 Joseph Cacioppo 69 Kensington Way Middletown 10940 Dean Tamburri 87 Holmes Rd. Newburgh 12550 Rod Pen 20 McNamara Ln. Goshen 10924 Lou Centelanza P.O. Box 181 Grahamsville 12740 Carol Chu 22 Reed Rd. New Hamburg 12580 Michael Brooks 21 Milton Turnpike Milton 12547 Mark Dombal 536 County Route 22 Middletown 10940 Marian Ferris 6 River Rd New Hamburg 12590 Thomas Reed 20 Alta Dr. Newburgh 12550 Chris Cerone 44 Bingham Rd Marlboro 12542 Mike Devine 38 Highland Terrace Newburgh 12530 Ben Seuder 345 Lattintown Rd Marlboro 12542 Catherine Aklers 25 Overlook Dr. Newburgh 12550 Susan Hamilton 12 Powelton Rd. Newburgh 12550 Prudence Barton 2 Water St New Hamburg 12590 Bruce W. Taylor 19 Stowe Street Newburgh 12590 Jon Basley 20 Point St New Hamburg 12590 Ting Chan 26 Cooper Road Apt. 605 Poughkeepsie 12603 Anthony Sergio 1869 State Rt. 213 Rifton 12471 John Borchert 284 South Ave. Poughkeepsie 12601 Bruna Rondinelli 152 Forest Glen Rd. New Paltz 12561 Sean Ward 8 Windwood Dr. Newburgh 12550 Nora Tegni 196 Montgomery St. Newburgh 12550

Page 8 Tom LeCount 9 Gold Rd. Poughkeepsie 12603 Ken Panza 33 Shotwell Rd Woodstock 12498 Alana Mikhalevsky 284 South Ave. Poughkeepsie 12601 John Palmer 31 Overlook Dr. Newburgh 12550 JoAnn Reed 404 Candlestick Hill Rd. Newburgh 12550 Kevin Treutch 251 Bingham Rd. Marlboro 12542 Tamsin Hollo 120 1st St Newburgh 12550 Ron Scuda 71 Mill House Rd Marlboro 12542 Scott Perry 2002 NY-17M #6 Goshen 10924 Tom Gandolfini 540 Oregon Trail Pine Bush 12566 Howard Baker 439 Lattintown Rd. Marlboro 12542 Chris Byrne 324 North Plank Rd. Newburgh 12550 Nina B. Penney 5417 Rte. 9W Newburgh 12550 James Lyons 5417 Rte. 9W Newburgh 12550 Maureen Halohan 40 Matthews St, Suite 108 Goshen 10924 Kaitlynn Perez 40 Matthews St, Suite 108 Goshen 10924 Anthony Yozzi 4 Powelton Rd Newburgh 12550 Andrew Fetherston 555 Hudson Valley Ave. New Windsor 12553 John Demarco 15 Ruby Rd. Marlboro 12542 Conrad Yantz 9 Berry Rd. Marlboro 12542 James Nestor 2 Saxon Dr. Poughkeepsie 12603 Jeremy Faraone 26 Wygant Rd. Marlboro 12542 Barbara Grove 17 Danskammer Rd. Newburgh 12550 James Morrison 10 Dogwood Ln. Marlboro 12542 Tim Muller 96 Bates Gates Rd. New Hampton 10958 Scott Parks 43 Pioneer Dr. Pine Plains 12567 William Gallucci 64 Aspen Ave. Middletown 10940 Rich Rosenerans 88 Washington St. Newburgh 12550 Edward Calli 104 Holmes Rd. Newburgh 12550 Eric Nastor 215 Oak St. Newburgh 12550 Jennifer Dering 400 Columbus Ave Valhalla 10595 Rob May 15 Lewis Lane Garrison 10520 Garrison Mattes 332 Salt Point Tpke. Poughkeepsie 12603 Rick Hull 116 Holmes Rd. Newburgh 12550

Page 9 Mike Gaydos 583 Rt. 32 Wallkill 12589 Jim Hoekenna 98 Grand St. Newburgh 12550 Scott Cowkery 5463 Rt 9W Newburgh 12550 Frank M. 19 Cenan Ct. Newburgh 12550 Andrew Storno 12 Cemetery Rd. Marlboro 12542 John Montgomery 421 Candlestick Hill Newburgh 12550 Laura Burkhardt 758 E. Crooked Hill Rd Pearl River 10965 Giovanna Russo 27 Hampton Hills Marlboro 12542 Anibal Scuadroni 255 Pine Brook Dr. Hyde Park 12528 Jeff and Paula Gliedman 313 Old Post Rd Newburgh 12550 Joe Brophy 750 River Rd Newburgh 12550 Jim Doering 10 Sharon Dr. Marlboro 12541 Bill Fioravanti 255 Main St. Goshen 10924 Scott Meyers 72 West Center St. Beacon 12508 Barbara Gosda 19 Homeland Ave Cornwall on Hudson 12518 Nancy Severns 49 Pembroke Dr Poughkeepsie 12603 Chris Byrne 324 North Plank Newburgh 12550 Jesus Miranda 11 S. Remsen Ave Wappingers Falls 12590 Patrick and Eileen Chadwick 8 Amherst Lane Wappingers Falls 12590 Konstantin Doren 46 Church St Beacon 12508 Paul Taylor 691 Weeler Hill Rd Wappingers Falls 12590 John Borchart 284 South Ave Poughkeepsie 12601 Chris Mattes 332 Salt Point Trd Poughkeepsie 12603 Bruce Hearn 1504 Parr Lake Newburgh 12550

Page 10 To: Judy Bartos, TRC September 27, 2019 From: Marcy Sammons and Andrew Davis, NYS DPS Re: 18-F-0325 Danskammer Energy - Proposed Viewpoint Recommendations for Developing Photo Simulations

Upon review of the viewpoints listed in Table 2: Summary of Photosimulation Viewpoint Locations, the photolog and maps, DPS recommends the Applicant consider the following comments and proposed locations for photosimulations.

Potential Simulation Location Viewpoints (VP):

o VP-2 is one of two viewpoint locations that captures the Agriculture / Open Land LSZ and has potential visibility of the Facility. (LSZ 3; Distance 2.9 miles) o VP-6 or VP-7 incorporate similar views at a middleground distance. These views are good representations of developed areas. (LSZ 1; Distance 2.3 / 2.8 miles) o VP-8 (* see notes regarding rail transportation corridors below) (LSZ 1; Distance 3.7 miles) o VP-12 or VP-13 along the City of Newburgh Waterfront Trail would represent a background distance view in a public area with prolonged views of the Facility. These background views are important as the facility is still visible from the locations. (LSZ 4; Distance 5.5 miles) o VP-23 and VP 24 provide direct views from an angle that will show new project components and removed portions of the existing Facility clearly. (LSZ 1,4; Distance 1.0 and 0.8 miles) o VP-27-b may be useful for demonstrating the view from Scenic Hudson River Rail route and the Wheeler Hill historic district. Please clarify notes at VP-27b re: historic district, and entry at App. 4 Table 4-B for Wheeler Hill Historic District as having no potential visibility. o VP-25 is at a superior elevation position and this photo location has prominent views of the Facility during leaf-off conditions. (LSZ 1, Distance 0.9 miles) o VP-32 from the upper entrance of Bowdoin County Park represents a middleground view and as a public park, where the use is recreational, the viewer would experience a long duration of view. (LSZ 1,2; Distance 2.5 miles) o VP-35 is a potentially useful location, as it encompasses the view from the AmTrak Hudson River rail line and includes a historic residence. (* see notes regarding rail transportation corridors below) (LSZ 1,4; Distance 1.4 miles) o VP-37 from the Hudson River is an important view as it is a foreground view that addresses what will be seen from the river. (LSZ 4; 0.1 miles) DPS Staff recommends including additional on-River location(s) to demonstrate views from foreground positions as would be available to recreational users of the Hudson River, a National Heritage River and location of the Hudson River Greenway Water Trail. VP-37 shows near-foreground site from easterly; additional locations with southerly view orientations should be considered. o Transportation corridors both automotive and rail will provide views of the facility. ▪ * Rail corridor photos should be taken at a height that represents the vantage point of the traveler. Most train platforms are roughly 48” above the top of the rails so for an accurate simulation, rail-related photos should be taken from a height that factors in the traveler’s vantage point, and eliminating much of the immediate foreground development (such as at VP-27b) . (DPS notes also that the “Scenic Rail” category in Table 1 indicates that the rail line is located within municipalities on the western shore of the Hudson River. The western Hudson lines are freight lines, and the AmTrak and MTA lines are on the eastern Hudson shores.) ▪ Interstate 84 crossing the Hudson has distant views of the Facility that will be seen by motorists and this location should be considered for a simulation. o The VIA Progress Report characterization that the proposed generating facility would generally not produce visible exhaust plumes warrants additional consideration. Other major generating plants including recently installed facilities are known to generate extensive stack plumes under a variety of conditions. This is particularly the case when plants are ramping up during morning hours with cool ambient air temperatures. Unless the Application can effectively demonstrate that there are no conditions under which stack plumes will be generated, with demonstrable evidence and documentation of proposed plume-elimination technology, DPS advises that photo-simulations of stack plumes will be important in addressing the operational condition analysis required by 16 NYCRR 1001.24(b)(8). Viewpoints to represent the operational condition stack plumes should be identified from the range of distance zones and Landscape Similarity Zones. Nighttime lighting should also be demonstrated, also. o DPS recommends developing a viewpoint from Beacon Mountain in SASS Sub-unit HH-26, which appears to have open vista to northwesterly location, as indicated below. This elevated position provides the Danskammer facility with a backdrop of forested hills.

Bartos, Judith

From: McLean, Laura (DOS) Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:41 AM To: Bartos, Judith; McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Danskammer: Visual Impact Assessment Attachments: S-2018-0092 Visual Impact Survey Request.pdf

Hello Ms. Bartos and Ms. McCormick, I received the attached request; however I was unable to locate the referenced VIA progress report on the project website. Can you please send me the VIA progress report or provide a direct link to this report?

Thank you, Laura McLean Coastal Energy Review Specialist NYS Coastal Management Program Consistency Review Unit, Office of Planning, Development & Community Infrastructure

New York Department of State O: (315) 235-0351 | [email protected] www.dos.ny.gov

1 Bartos, Judith

From: McLean, Laura (DOS) Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 1:54 PM To: Bartos, Judith Subject: RE: Danskammer: Visual Impact Assessment

Thank you

Laura McLean New York Department of State O: (315) 235-0351 | [email protected]

From: Bartos, Judith Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:43 AM To: McLean, Laura (DOS) ; McCormick, Kaitlin ; Colella, Brenda D. ; 'Howard Taylor' Cc: McCormick, Kaitlin ; Colella, Brenda D. ; 'Howard Taylor' ; Keller, Michael Subject: RE: Danskammer: Visual Impact Assessment

ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected emails. Thank you for your question.

The report is available at this link: https://static.wixstatic.com/ugd/8dea01_2651470c44af47a0940a41b380aae144.pdf

And linked on the Article 10 page of the Danskammer website https://www.danskammerenergy.com/article-10

Judy Bartos Sr. GIS Systems Analyst/Sr. Scientist

650 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills, Lowell, MA 01854 T 978.656.3506 | F 978.453.1995

T~C -----LinkedIn | Twitter | Blog | TRCcompanies.com

Please note that our domain name and email addresses have changed

From: McLean, Laura (DOS) Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:41 AM To: Bartos, Judith ; McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Danskammer: Visual Impact Assessment

Thank you,

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Hayley Carlock Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 10:42 AM To: Bartos, Judith Cc: McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Danskammer Visual Impact Survey

Hi Judy,

I received the notice from TRC inviting comments on the VIA progress report. I cannot locate the VIA progress report anywhere on the danskammernergy.com website. Can you point me to where I might access the document? I’ve also received inquiries from a few other stakeholders who couldn’t locate the report.

Thanks, Hayley

Hayley Carlock, Esq. Director of Environmental Advocacy Scenic Hudson, Inc. Tel: 845 473 4440 Ext 210 Fax: 845 473 2648 [email protected] ______

Promoting Regional Identity, Building Community, Strengthening Resiliency: Our Annual Report shows how we’re connecting people with the inspirational power of the Hudson River. ______

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Bartos, Judith Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:46 AM To: Hayley Carlock Cc: McCormick, Kaitlin; Colella, Brenda D.; 'Howard Taylor'; Keller, Michael Subject: RE: Danskammer Visual Impact Survey

Thank you for your question.

The report is available at this link: https://static.wixstatic.com/ugd/8dea01_2651470c44af47a0940a41b380aae144.pdf

And linked on the Article 10 page of the Danskammer website https://www.danskammerenergy.com/article-10

Judy Bartos Sr. GIS Systems Analyst/Sr. Scientist

650 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills, Lowell, MA 01854 T 978.656.3506 | F 978.453.1995

TRC -----LinkedIn | Twitter | Blog | TRCcompanies.com

Please note that our domain name and email addresses have changed

From: Hayley Carlock Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 10:42 AM To: Bartos, Judith Cc: McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Danskammer Visual Impact Survey

Hi Judy,

Thanks, Hayley

Hayley Carlock, Esq. Director of Environmental Advocacy Scenic Hudson, Inc. Tel: 845 473 4440 Ext 210 Fax: 845 473 2648 [email protected] ______

Promoting Regional Identity, Building Community, Strengthening Resiliency:

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Marie Campanaro Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 9:09 AM To: Bartos, Judith; McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Visual Impact Survey Request - Danskammer Energy Center

Importance: High

Good Morning,

I am the Secretary to Supervisor Bob LaColla, Town of Fishkill, and we are trying to locate the Progress Report with the Visual Study Area on the Danskammer website but unfortunately cannot find it. We would appreciate it if you could please send us the link or tell us where on the website it can be located.

Thank you,

Marie

Marie A. Campanaro Town of Fishkill Secretary to the Supervisor 845-831-7800 ext. 3309 | [email protected] 807 Route 52, Fishkill, NY 12524 www.fishkill-ny.gov 11

Office hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00am – 4:30pm

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Marie Campanaro Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 9:48 AM To: Bartos, Judith Subject: RE: Visual Impact Survey Request - Danskammer Energy Center

Thank you

Marie A. Campanaro Town of Fishkill Secretary to the Supervisor 845-831-7800 ext. 3309 | [email protected] 807 Route 52, Fishkill, NY 12524 www.fishkill-ny.gov

Office hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00am – 4:30pm

From: Bartos, Judith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2019 9:13 AM To: Marie Campanaro ; McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: RE: Visual Impact Survey Request - Danskammer Energy Center

Thank you for your question.

The report is available at this link: https://static.wixstatic.com/ugd/8dea01_2651470c44af47a0940a41b380aae144.pdf

And linked on the Article 10 page of the Danskammer website https://www.danskammerenergy.com/article-10

Judy Bartos Sr. GIS Systems Analyst/Sr. Scientist

650 Suffolk Street, Wannalancit Mills, Lowell, MA 01854 T 978.656.3506 | F 978.453.1995

-----LinkedIn | Twitter | Blog | TRCcompanies.com

Please note that our domain name and email addresses have changed

From: Marie Campanaro Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 9:09 AM To: Bartos, Judith ; McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Visual Impact Survey Request - Danskammer Energy Center Importance: High

Good Morning,

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Bob LaColla Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 11:23 AM To: Bartos, Judith Cc: Marie Campanaro; Becki Tompkins; Katherine Buneta Subject: REQUEST: Danskammer - Visual Impact Survey

Ms. Bartos,

I write to request consideration of an extension of the deadline for the Visual Impact Survey for the proposed Danskammer Energy Center. In discussion with the Town Board at a regular meeting last night, the board indicated a desire to hold a hearing to hear the opinions of the general public. However, the time needed to properly notice the event and compile the input would delay our response to you well beyond the deadline of September 25. Please tell me if there is a possibility to extend the deadline one month to allow for a more complete response to your survey.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Bob LaColla

Town of Fishkill Supervisor

845-831-7800 ext. 3309 | [email protected] 807 Route 52, Fishkill, NY 12524 www.fishkill-ny.gov

Office hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00am – 4:30pm ll

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Joseph D. Cavaccini Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:26 AM To: Bartos, Judith; McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Visual Impact Survey - Danskammer Energy Center

Hi, I am writing in response to your letter requesting input on the potential visual impacts of historical/natural sites that may be affected by the upgrade of the Danskammer Energy Center.

Directly across the Hudson River in the Town of Wappinger sits Carnwath Farms Historic Site & Park, a Town of Wappinger owned park that is listed on both the State – Federal Registers of Historic Places. The views of this property stretch 360 degrees around the Hudson River and the surrounding valley. The Town is hoping that the visual impacts will not impact the views from this site.

Also surrounding Carnwath is the Wheeler Hill Historic District, which consists of about 10 residences and properties from the mid18th century to the mid19th century. We are concerned that this riverfront historic district may be negatively impacted by an expansion.

South of the Wheeler Hill Historic District, sits the hamlet of Chelsea which was once a bustling port community during the 19th century filled with historical properties along the River.

I would be happy to provide further information to you and your team on these locations! Joey

Joseph D. Cavaccini Town Historian | Town of Wappinger, NY 20 Middlebush Road | Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 office: 845.297.4158 ext 107 | fax: 845.297.4558 email: [email protected] website: www.townofwappingerny.gov

Notice to recipient: The Town of Wappinger has obtained a new domain name which has changed my email to [email protected]. All official Town of Wappinger email addresses will now end with @townofwappingerny.gov

Please take some time to visit our new web site www.townofwappingerny.gov

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Robert May Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:43 PM To: Bartos, Judith Subject: Concerns about Danskammer

Dear Ms. Bartos,

I have been to the Danskammer Open House and I have seen the architectural renderings of the future plant and I am not at all convinced that the projected plant as currently designed could withstand hurricane forces similar to those that disabled the original plant. Part of the future plant will be supported by stilts unlikely to weather the sustained pounding of an extreme weather event, leaving the entire structure vulnerable. And while the new plant will be sited a few feet further inland than the original, it is still well within the flood plain of a rising tide. What other safeguards are planned to protect the plant? Also, the presenters stated, and the CEO's recent newsletter confirmed, that the plant would fill the void in power until safer, cleaner energy could be brought on line, Yet construction of this gas fired plant would lock us into a reliance on natural gas, a fossil fuel which is prone to ruptures and leakage, for the next twenty years, even though climate scientist warn that we have less than twelve years to end our reliance on fossil fuels. Why not use the same resources to create sources of renewable energy rather than funnel funds into a plant that is ultimately doomed to obsolescence? Finally, natural gas plants, even when working properly, release methane which contains benzene and other dangerous chemicals. How can we be sure that TRC will protect the health of neighboring communities?

Thank you,

Rob May

1 Bartos, Judith

From: Bucobo, Javier Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 11:33 AM To: Bartos, Judith Cc: McCormick, Kaitlin Subject: Danskammer Energy Center

Ms. Bartos,

I am writing you to discuss a recent letter that NYPA received from you regarding a visual impact survey request for the Danskammer Energy Center project. We are not sure why NYPA was asked to review the visual impact assessment.

Please let me know of a convenient time for me to call you and discuss this mater.

Sincerely,

Javier

Javier E. Bucobo Principal Attorney Contracts, Licensing & Environmental

New York Power Authority 123 Main Street 9th floor White Plains, New York 10601 (914) 390-8238 (o) | (914) 522-9925 (c)| [email protected] www.nypa.gov

1 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3500

SUSTAINMENT

November 21 , 2019

Judy Bartos Visualization Specialist TRC Companies, Inc. 650 Suffolk St, Suite 200 Lowell, MA O1854

Dear Ms. Bartos,

As requested, the Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse coordinated within DoD an informal review of the Danskammer Energy Center Natural Gas Project. The results of our review indicated that the natural gas project, located in Orange County, New York, as proposed, will have minimal impact on military operations conducted in the area.

Please note that this informal review by the DoD Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse does not constitute an action under 49 United States Code Section 44718 and that the DoD is not bound by the conclusion arrived at under this informal review. To expedite our review in the Obstruction Evaluation Airport Airspace Analysis (OE/AAA) process, please add the project number 2019-09-NG-DEV-05 in the comments section of the filing. If you have any questions, please contact me at [email protected] or at 703-571-0076.

Sincerely,

Steven J. Sample Deputy Director Military Aviation and Installation Assurance Siting Clearinghouse