DOCSLIB.ORG

Carboniferous Newsletter 2003 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carboniferous Newsletter 2003 2 Volume 21 July 2003 Eoparastaffella simplex Vdovenko 1954 Eoparastaffella rotunda Vdovenko 1971 sccs I.U.G.S. SUBCOMMISSION ON CARBONIFEROUS STRATIGRAPHY July 2003 Table of Contents CHAIRMAN’S COLUMN ...................................................................................................................... 1 SECRETARY / EDITOR’S REPORT 2002-2003 ................................................................................... 3 SCCS ANNUAL REPORT 2002 .............................................................................................................. 3 TASK/PROJECT GROUP REPORTS .................................................................................................... 6 Report of the Task Group seeking a GSSP close to the traditional Tournaisian-Viséan boundary ........................................................................................................... 6 Progress report from the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Viséan-Serpukhovian boundary ........................................................................................................ 6 Report from the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing Bashkirian-Moscovian boundary .................................................................................................... 10 Progress report of the Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the Moscovian-Kasimovian boundary .................................................................................................. 10 CONTRIBUTIONS BY MEMBERS .................................................................................................... 12 Updated cyclothem constraints on radiometric dating of the Pennsylvanian succession in North America and its correlation with dates from Europe (Heckel) ........................................................................ 12 Defining boundary stratotypes - Speciation, migration, and extinction (Pfefferkorn) ................................ 20 Report on the Upper Viséan-Serpukhovian conodont zonation in South China (Wang Zhi-hao and Qi Yu-ping) ..................................................................................................... 22 Additional comments on the Upper Paleozoic glaciations in Argentina (González) .................................. 25 Did the “Ostrogsky episode” really exist? (Mosseichik and Ignatiev) ..................................................... 26 Correlation of the Moscow Basin Lower Carboniferous with the Carboniferous megafloral zones of the Euramerican palaeofloristic region (Mosseichik) ........................................................... 29 U-Pb zircon and K-Ar illite radiometric dating of Upper Stephanian continental successions in the French Massif Central. An overview of recent results and its correlation with other occurrences in the Variscan Belt of Europe (Becq-Giraudon and Bruguier) ............................. 32 Carboniferous tetrapod footprint biostratigraphy and biochronology (Lucas) ......................................... 36 FORTHCOMING CONFERENCES .................................................................................................... 42 SCCS VOTING & CORRESPONDING MEMBERSHIP 2003 ......................................................... 45 SCCS OFFICERS AND VOTING MEMBERS 2000-2004 ................................................................ 54 Carboniferous Newsletter Newsletter on Carboniferous Stratigraphy Edited by D.M. Work IUGS SUBCOMMISSION ON CARBONIFEROUS STRATIGRAPHY / VOL. 21 - 2003 task group. More detail on the activities of the boundary task CHAIRMAN’S COLUMN groups follows the introductory portion of this Newsletter. In This year has seen much more progress toward defining addition, the Project Group on Comparative Angara and boundaries between the stages of the Carboniferous System. At Gondwana Biostratigraphy chaired by Marina Durante is work- this time, we are looking forward to the 15th International Con- ing on a paper ‘Upper Paleozoic boreal biota: Stratigraphy and gress on the Stratigraphy and Geology of the Carboniferous and paleogeography.’ This group has seven members who are work- Permian Systems [XV-ICCP] to be held in Utrecht, the Nether- ing on various fossil groups [including brachiopods, small fo- lands, during the week of August 11-15, 2003. At this meeting rams, pelecypods, and plants] as well as the stratigraphy of north- there will be a Carboniferous workshop on Wednesday, August ern and northeastern Russia and Mongolia. 13, at which all boundary task groups will meet in adjacent rooms Stage and Series Subdivision equipped with poster and layout space, projection equipment, and microscopes for examining conodonts and forams. In the I have received very little formal feedback on my discussion past several years, I have found that this type of meeting of the of stages and series in the Carboniferous. What I have heard task group to which I belong has been very fruitful for inter- informally strongly supports the idea of relatively few stages, change of information, ideas, and particularly for achieving com- that is, a similar number of stages as exist in the Devonian and mon ground on the recognition of the fossil taxa that are critical Permian, and certainly far fewer than exist in the northwest Euro- for defining boundaries. On Friday morning, August 15, there pean regional classification of the Carboniferous. At present, will be a meeting of the Subcommission on Carboniferous Stratig- there are task groups working on stage boundaries for five stages raphy, where we can discuss the results of the workshops and in addition to the two that have already been established by the other issues of interest to Carboniferous stratigraphers. Devonian-Carboniferous and Mid-Carboniferous boundaries, for a total of seven. One of the issues to be dealt with at the SCCS Status of Boundary Task Groups meeting in Utrecht will be to reduce the rank of the 7 Namurian The Tournaisian-Viséan Boundary Task Group chaired by and 3 Westphalian stages that were formally approved in 1989 George Sevastopulo is putting the finishing touches on its pro- [see Wagner and Winkler Prins, 1997 Proceedings of XIII ICCP, posal for the base of the Viséan at the Pengchong section in 1: 187-196] to that of regional substages. Regarding stage names, Guangxi, southern China. The Task Group to establish a GSSP what little I heard generally supported the idea that the faunal close to the existing Viséan-Serpukhovian Boundary chaired by elements characterizing the Russian names for the late Pennsyl- Barry Richards has 20 members and is summarizing the current vanian stages are far more readily recognized throughout most state of knowledge on useful biotic lineages, potentially useful of the large area of Eurasia and the western Arctic region, whereas sequence-stratigraphic, chemostratigraphic, magnetostratgraphic the faunal elements characterizing the North American names and other physical events, and the locations of essentially con- are recognized elsewhere only in part of South America. Possi- tinuous, fossiliferous marine successions that are readily acces- bly a little of the post-Viséan biota characterizing the Russian sible. The Task Group to establish a GSSP close to the existing names is recognized in Angaraland, but the biota of neither set Bashkirian-Moscovian Boundary chaired by John Groves has of post-Viséan names is recognized in the Gondwana region. 17 members and is compiling lists of potentially useful biotic Regarding series subdivision, what I have heard suggests that lineages, physical and chemostratigraphic events, and basins expanding the Viséan as a series upward to include the where continuous sections exist. The Task Group to establish a Serpukhovian as a stage, and expanding the Westphalian down- GSSP close to the Moscovian-Kasimovian Boundary chaired by ward to include the upper Namurian [Alekseev, 2001 Carbonifer- Elisa Villa held a meeting during August 2002 in Ufa, Russia, ous Newsletter, 19: 14-16], would depart too much from a volumi- where they visited possible candidate sections in the southern nous amount of traditional literature to be pragmatically useful Urals, and where the Russian conodont workers reported the or acceptable. Thus it appears that the western European termi- possibility that a lineage involving Idiognathodus sagittalis may nology for the three higher series of the Carboniferous would be useful in defining the boundary. A subsequent meeting of most easily be retained for only the regional classification [see Russian, Ukrainian, and American conodont workers in Mos- Wagner and Winkler Prins, 2002 Carboniferous Newsletter, 20: cow in May-June 2003 further evaluated this possibility and 14-16]. This proposal also would require three more task groups concluded that I. sagittalis occurs in Midcontinent North to be set up to select GSSPs at the base of three Belgian stages, America and the Moscow and southern Urals regions of Russia, which would be a time-consuming process, considering how as well as in the Donets Basin of Ukraine from which it was long it has taken for the Tournaisian-Viséan boundary to be named. Thus more activity is planned on refining the taxonomy established. Because no other alternative has been suggested, of the lineage and identifying the accompanying fossils of other it appears that the proposal to utilize the positional terms Lower, important groups. This same meeting in Moscow also discussed Middle, and Upper to provide three series in each
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strengthening Protected Area System of the Komi Republic to Conserve Virgin Forest Biodiversity in the Pechora Headwaters Region
    Strengthening Protected Area System of the Komi Republic to Conserve Virgin Forest Biodiversity in the Pechora Headwaters Region PIMS 2496, Atlas Award 00048772, Atlas Project No: 00059042 Terminal Evaluation, Volume I November 2014 Russian Federation GEF SO1: Catalysing the Sustainability of Protected Areas SP3: Strengthened National Terrestrial Protected Area Networks Russian Federation, Ministry of Natural Resources Komi Republic, Ministry of Natural Resources United National Development Program Stuart Williams KOMI REPUBLIC PAS PROJECT - TE Acknowledgements The mission to the Komi Republic was well organised and smoothly executed. For this, I would like to thank everyone involved starting with Irina Bredneva and Elena Bazhenova of the UNDP-CO for making all the travel arrangements so smooth and easy, and making me welcome in Moscow. In the Komi Republic, the project team ensured that I met the right stakeholders, showed me the results of the project efforts in remote and beautiful areas of the republic, and accompanying me. Special thanks are due to Alexander Popov (the National Project Director) and Vasily Ponomarev (the Project Manager) for the connections, arrangements, for accompanying me and for many fruitful discussions. Other team members who accompanied the mission included Svetlana Zagirova, Andrei Melnichuk and Anastasiya Tentyukova. I am also grateful to all the other stakeholders who gave freely of their time and answered my questions patiently (please see Annex III for a list of all the people met over the course of the mission to the Komi Republic). I am also particularly grateful for the tireless efforts of Alexander Oshis, my interpreter over the course of the mission even when he was not well, for the clear and accurate interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Sierra Nacimiento and Vicinity, New
    iv Contents ABSTRACT 7 TERTIARY-QUATERNARY 47 INTRODUCTION 7 QUATERNARY 48 LOCATION 7 Bandelier Tuff 48 PHYSIOGRAPHY 9 Surficial deposits 48 PREVIOUS WORK 9 PALEOTECTONIC SETTING 48 ROCKS AND FORMATIONS 9 REGIONAL TECTONIC SETTING 49 PRECAMBRIAN 9 STRUCTURE 49 Northern Nacimiento area 9 NACIMIENTO UPLIFT 49 Southern Nacimiento area 15 Nacimiento fault 51 CAMBRIAN-ORDOVICIAN (?) 20 Pajarito fault 52 MISSISSIPPIAN 20 Synthetic reverse faults 52 Arroyo Peñasco Formation 20 Eastward-trending faults 53 Log Springs Formation 21 Trail Creek fault 53 PENNSYLVANIAN 21 Antithetic reverse faults 53 Osha Canyon Formation 23 Normal faults 53 Sandia Formation 23 Folds 54 Madera Formation 23 SAN JUAN BASIN 55 Paleotectonic interpretation 25 En echelon folds 55 PERMIAN 25 Northeast-trending faults 55 Abo Formation 25 Synclinal bend 56 Yeso Formation 27 Northerly trending normal faults 56 Glorieta Sandstone 30 Antithetic reverse faults 56 Bernal Formation 30 GALLINA-ARCHULETA ARCH 56 TRIASSIC 30 CHAMA BASIN 57 Chinle Formation 30 RIΟ GRANDE RIFT 57 JURASSIC 34 JEMEZ VOLCANIC FIELD 59 Entrada Sandstone 34 TECTONIC EVOLUTION 60 Todilto Formation 34 MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES 63 Morrison Formation 34 COPPER 63 Depositional environments 37 Mineralization 63 CRETACEOUS 37 Origin 67 Dakota Formation 37 AGGREGATE 69 Mancos Shale 39 TRAVERTINE 70 Mesaverde Group 40 GYPSUM 70 Lewis Shale 41 COAL 70 Pictured Cliffs Sandstone 41 ΗUMΑTE 70 Fruitland Formation and Kirtland Shale URANIUM 70 undivided 42 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY 72 TERTIARY 42 OIL AND GAS 72 Ojo Alamo Sandstone
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Cretaceous Research 32 (2011) 135e142 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A reassessment of large theropod dinosaur tracks from the mid-Cretaceous (late AlbianeCenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia: A case for mistaken identity Anthony Romilio a,*, Steven W. Salisbury a,b a School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia b Vertebrate Paleontology Section, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-4080, USA article info abstract Article history: Multivariate analysis is used to differentiate shape variations between ichnites of theropod and Received 9 June 2010 ornithopod dinosaurs. Tracks of an alleged theropod cf. Tyrannosauropus from the mid-Cretaceous (late Accepted in revised form 10 November 2010 AlbianeCenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia were Available online 22 November 2010 examined and foot shape ratios calculated. Multivariate analysis of these shape variables indicates this track-maker was an ornithopod dinosaur.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassignment of Vertebrate Ichnotaxa from the Upper Carboniferous 'Fern
    Reassignment of vertebrate ichnotaxa from the Upper Carboniferous ‘Fern Ledges’, Lancaster Formation, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada MATTHEW R. STIMSON1,2*, RANDALL F. MILLER1, AND SPENCER G. LUCAS3 1. Steinhammer Palaeontology Laboratory, New Brunswick Museum, Saint John, New Brunswick E2K 1E5, Canada 2. New Brunswick Geological Surveys Branch, Department of Energy and Mines, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1, Canada 3. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87104, USA *Corresponding author <[email protected]> Date received: 14 April 2015 ¶ Date accepted: 04 September 2015 ABSTRACT Vertebrate ichnotaxa described by George Frederic Matthew in 1910 from the Upper Carboniferous (Lower Pennsylvanian) ‘Fern Ledges’ of Saint John, New Brunswick, were dismissed as dubious trackways by previous authors. Thus, three new ichnospecies Matthew described appeared in the 1975 Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology as “unrecognized or unrecognizable” and were mostly forgotten by vertebrate ichnologists. These traces include Hylopus (?) variabilis, Nanopus (?) vetustus and Bipezia bilobata. One ichnospecies, Hylopus (?) variabilis, here is retained as a valid tetrapod footprint ichnotaxon and reassigned to the ichnogenus Limnopus as a new combination, together with other poorly preserved specimens Matthew labeled, but never described. Nanopus (?) vetustus and Bipezia bilobata named by Matthew in the same paper, have been reexamined and remain as nomina dubia. RÉSUMÉ Les ichnotaxons vertébrés de Fern Ledges du Carbonifère supérieur (Pennsylvanien inférieur) de Saint John, au Nouveau-Brunswick, décrits par George Frederic Matthew en 1910 avaient été rejetés par des auteurs précédents les considérant comme des séries de traces douteuses. Trois nouvelles ichnoespèces décrites par Matthew sont ainsi appa- rues dans le Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology (Traité sur la paléontologie des invertébrés) de 1975 à titre d’espèces « non identifiées ou non identifiables » et ont principalement été laissées aux ichnologues des vertébrés.
    [Show full text]
  • Moss Occurrences in Yugyd Va National Park, Subpolar and Northern Urals, European North-East Russia
    Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e32307 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e32307 Data Paper Moss occurrences in Yugyd Va National Park, Subpolar and Northern Urals, European North-East Russia Galina Zheleznova‡, Tatyana Shubina‡, Svetlana Degteva‡‡, Ivan Chadin , Mikhail Rubtsov‡ ‡ Institute of Biology of Komi Scientific Centre of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Syktyvkar, Russia Corresponding author: Tatyana Shubina ([email protected]) Academic editor: Yasen Mutafchiev Received: 10 Dec 2018 | Accepted: 25 Mar 2019 | Published: 01 Apr 2019 Citation: Zheleznova G, Shubina T, Degteva S, Chadin I, Rubtsov M (2019) Moss occurrences in Yugyd Va National Park, Subpolar and Northern Urals, European North-East Russia. Biodiversity Data Journal 7: e32307. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.7.e32307 Abstract Background This study produced a dataset containing information on moss occurrences in the territory of Yugyd Va National Park, located in the Subpolar and Northern Urals, European North- East Russia. The dataset summarises occurrences noted by long-term bryological explorations in remote areas of the Subpolar and Northern Urals from 1943 to 2015 and from studies published since 1915. The dataset consists of 4,120 occurrence records. The occurrence data were extracted from herbarium specimen labels (3,833 records) and data from published literature (287 records). Most of the records (4,104) are georeferenced. A total of 302 moss taxa belonging to 112 genera and 36 families are reported herein to occur in Yugyd Va National Park. The diversity of bryophytes in this National Park has not yet been fully explored and further exploration will lead to more taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Correlation Chart for Western Colorado and Northwestern New Mexico
    New Mexico Geological Society Guidebook, 32nd Field Conference, Western Slope Colorado, 1981 75 STRATIGRAPHIC CORRELATION CHART FOR WESTERN COLORADO AND NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO M. E. MacLACHLAN U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado 80225 INTRODUCTION De Chelly Sandstone (or De Chelly Sandstone Member of the The stratigraphic nomenclature applied in various parts of west- Cutler Formation) of the west side of the basin is thought to ern Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, and a small part of east- correlate with the Glorieta Sandstone of the south side of the central Utah is summarized in the accompanying chart (fig. 1). The basin. locations of the areas, indicated by letters, are shown on the index map (fig. 2). Sources of information used in compiling the chart are Cols. B.-C. shown by numbers in brackets beneath the headings for the col- Age determinations on the Hinsdale Formation in parts of the umns. The numbers are keyed to references in an accompanying volcanic field range from 4.7 to 23.4 m.y. on basalts and 4.8 to list. Ages where known are shown by numbers in parentheses in 22.4 m.y. on rhyolites (Lipman, 1975, p. 6, p. 90-100). millions of years after the rock name or in parentheses on the line The early intermediate-composition volcanics and related rocks separating two chronostratigraphic units. include several named units of limited areal extent, but of simi- No Quaternary rocks nor small igneous bodies, such as dikes, lar age and petrology—the West Elk Breccia at Powderhorn; the have been included on this chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Investigations in Illinois in 1916, Under Direction of Fred H
    m$ 1 H On 5 T ATE QE OI-OQICAL miWif.n . SURVEY 3 3051 00000 3057 ILLINOIS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LSBRAnY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/oilinvestigation35illi STATE OF ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FRANK W. DE WOLF. Director BULLETIN No. 35 OIL INVESTIGATIONS IN ILLINOIS IN 1916 UNDER DIRECTION OF FRED H. KAY Petroleum in Illinois in 1916 By Fred H. Kay Parts of Saline, Williamson, Pope and Johnson counties By Albert D. Brokaw Parts of Williamson, Union and Jackson counties By Stuart St. Clair The Ava area By Stuart St. Glair The Gentralia area By Stuart St. Glair Parts of Hardin, Pope, and Saline counties By Charles Butts WORK IN COOPERATION WITH U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA 1917 CL . 2- STATE GEOLOGICAL COMMISSION Frank O. Lowden, Chairman Governor of Illinois Thomas C. Chamberlin, Vice-Chairman Edmund J. James, Secretary President of the University of Illinois Frank W. DeWolf, Director Fred H. Kay, Asst. State Geologist LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL State Geological Survey University of Illinois, January 26, 1917 Governor Frank O. Lozvden, Chairman, and Members of the Geological Commission. Gentlemen : I submit herewith manuscript of reports on oil investiga- tions in Illinois in 1916, and recommend their publication as Bulletin 35. Because of its importance, part of this bulletin appeared in abbreviated form as an Extract, and development in the field described is now proceed- ing according to recommendations. The demand for these publications increases constantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan University Library
    CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY , THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN VOL. XWI, No. 11, pp. 241-263 (2 pk., 5 figs.) OCTOBER9, 1962 A MISSISSIPPIAN FLORA FROM NORTHEASTERN UTAH AND ITS FAUNAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONS BY CHESTER A. ARNOLD and WALTER SADLICK Published with aid from the Edward Pulteney Wright and Jean Davies Wright Expendable Trust Fund MUSEUM OF PfiEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Director: LEWISB. KELLUM The series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for the publication of papers based chiefly upon the collection in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals upon request. A list of the separate papers may also be obtained. Correspondence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. VOLS.11-XV. Parts of volumes may be obtained if available. VOLUMEXVI 1. Two Late Pleistocene Faunas from Southwestern Kansas, by Claude W. Hibbard and Dwight W. Taylor. Pages 1-223, with 16 plates. 2. North American Genera of the Devonian Rugose Coral Family Digonophylli- dae, by Erwin C. Stumm. Pages 225-243, with 6 plates. 3. Notes on Jaekelocystis hartleyi and Pseudocrinjtes gordoni, two Rhombi- feran Cystoids Described by Charles Schuchert in 1903, by Robert V. Kesling. Pages 245-273, with 8 plates. 4. Corals of the Traverse Group of Michigan. Part VI, Cladopora, Striatopora, and Thamnopora, by Erwin C.
    [Show full text]
  • Permophiles Issue
    Table of Contents Notes from the SPS Secretary 1 Lucia Angiolini Notes from the SPS Chair 2 Shuzhong Shen Officers and Voting Members since August, 2012 2 Report on the First International Congress on Continental Ichnology [ICCI-2015], El Jadida, Morocco, 21-25 April, 2015 4 Hafid Saber Report on the 7th International Brachiopod Congress, May 22-25, 2015 Nanjing, China 8 Lucia Angiolini Progress report on correlation of nonmarine and marine Lower Permian strata, New Mexico, USA 10 Spencer G. Lucas, Karl Krainer, Daniel Vachard, Sebastian Voigt, William A. DiMichele, David S. Berman, Amy C. Henrici, Joerg W. Schneider, James E. Barrick Range of morphology in monolete spores from the uppermost Permian Umm Irna Formation of Jordan 17 Michael H. Stephenson Palynostratigraphy of the Permian Faraghan Formation in the Zagros Basin, Southern Iran: preliminary studies 20 Amalia Spina, Mohammad R. Aria-Nasab , Simonetta Cirilli, Michael H. Stephenson Towards a redefinition of the lower boundary of the Protochirotherium biochron 22 Fabio Massimo Petti, Massimo Bernardi, Hendrik Klein Preliminary report of new conodont records from the Permian-Triassic boundary section at Guryul ravine, Kashmir, India 24 Michael E. Brookfield, Yadong Sun The paradox of the end Permian global oceanic anoxia 26 Claudio Garbelli, Lucia Angiolini, Uwe Brand, Shuzhong Shen, Flavio Jadoul, Karem Azmy, Renato Posenato, Changqun Cao Late Carboniferous-Permian-Early Triassic Nonmarine-Marine Correlation: Call for global cooperation 28 Joerg W. Schneider, Spencer G. Lucas Example for the description of basins in the CPT Nonmarine-Marine Correlation Chart Thuringian Forest Basin, East Germany 28 Joerg W. Schneider, Ralf Werneburg, Ronny Rößler, Sebastian Voigt, Frank Scholze ANNOUNCEMENTS 36 SUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR ISSUE 62 39 Photo 1:The Changhsingian Gyaniyma Formation (Unit 8, bedded and Unit 9, massive, light) at the Gyaniyma section, SW Tibet.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassignment of Vertebrate Ichnotaxa from the Upper Carboniferous ‘Fern Ledges’, Lancaster Formation, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada Matthew R
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 5:46 p.m. Atlantic Geology Reassignment of vertebrate ichnotaxa from the Upper Carboniferous ‘Fern Ledges’, Lancaster Formation, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada Matthew R. Stimson, Randall F. Miller and Spencer G. Lucas Volume 52, 2016 Article abstract Vertebrate ichnotaxa described by George Frederic Matthew in 1910 from the URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/ageo52art02 Upper Carboniferous (Lower Pennsylvanian) ‘Fern Ledges’ of Saint John, New Brunswick, were dismissed as dubious trackways by previous authors. Thus, See table of contents three new ichnospecies Matthew described appeared in the 1975 Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology as “unrecognized or unrecognizable” and were mostly forgotten by vertebrate ichnologists. These traces include Hylopus (?) Publisher(s) variabilis, Nanopus (?) vetustus and Bipezia bilobata. One ichnospecies, Hylopus (?) variabilis, here is retained as a valid tetrapod footprint ichnotaxon and Atlantic Geoscience Society reassigned to the ichnogenus Limnopus as a new combination, together with other poorly preserved specimens Matthew labeled, but never described. ISSN Nanopus (?) vetustus and Bipezia bilobata named by Matthew in the same paper, have been reexamined and remain as nomina dubia. 0843-5561 (print) 1718-7885 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Stimson, M. R., Miller, R. F. & Lucas, S. G. (2016). Reassignment of vertebrate ichnotaxa from the Upper Carboniferous ‘Fern Ledges’, Lancaster Formation, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. Atlantic Geology, 52, 20–34. All rights reserved © Atlantic Geology, 2016 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.
    [Show full text]