DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Calgary Perceptual Dialectology In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Calgary Perceptual Dialectology In UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY PERCEPTUAL DIALECTOLOGY IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS OF GERMAN by HENRY LAM A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF GERMANIC, SLAVIC AND EAST ASIAN STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA MARCH, 2012 © HENRY LAM 2012 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-88246-7 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-88246-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privée, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de thesis. cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES The undersigned certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies for acceptance, a thesis entitled “PERCEPTUAL DIALECTOLOGY IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS OF GERMAN” submitted by HENRY LAM in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS. Supervisor, Mary Grantham O’Brien, GSEA Olga Mladenova, GSEA Yan Guo, Faculty of Education Date ii Abstract The goal of this thesis is to investigate how second language learners of German perceive language variation. A three-part linguistic experiment was carried out on twenty university students to determine their ability to discriminate dialects from the standard language, their understanding of dialects, and their attitudes towards dialects. I found that the discrimination ability of students is generally high, and that language proficiency predicted discrimination ability. Intelligibility was generally poor and was unaffected by language proficiency. Students generally found Low German dialects to be more pleasant than Central and Upper German dialects. iii Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank those who made this thesis possible. I owe my deepest gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Dr. Mary O’Brien, for her incredible knowledge, patience, and guidance throughout this whole process. I would also like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Dr. Olga Mladenova and Dr. Yan Guo, for their insight and suggestions, Gisela Engels for her assistance with data analysis, SSHRC for generously funding this project, and all the students who participated in this project. I am grateful for the audio recordings from the Institut für Deutsche Sprache and from the Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas, with special thanks to Dr. Alexander Werth and Hanni Schnell. Finally, this thesis would not have been possible without the unwavering love and support of my family. iv Table of Contents APPROVAL PAGE II ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................... VIII LIST OF FIGURES AND ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................ IX LIST OF SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS AND NOMENCLATURE ...................... X INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................ 6 2.1 DIALECTOLOGY IN GERMAN ...................................................................................... 6 2.2 PERCEPTUAL DIALECTOLOGY .................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Perceptual Dialectology in L1 Speakers .......................................................... 12 2.2.2 Perceptual Dialectology in German L1 Speakers ........................................... 17 2.2.3 L2 Speakers ...................................................................................................... 25 2.3 DIGLOSSIA ............................................................................................................... 29 2.4 GERMAN DIALECT VARIATION ................................................................................ 30 2.5 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 35 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 37 v 3.1 PARTICIPANTS .......................................................................................................... 37 3.2 PROCEDURE ............................................................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Task 1: Dialect Discrimination ........................................................................ 40 3.2.2 Task 2: Dialect Intelligibility ........................................................................... 55 3.2.3 Task 3: Dialect Attitudes .................................................................................. 57 3.3 DATA ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................... 60 3.3.1 Task 1: Dialect Discrimination ........................................................................ 60 3.3.2 Task 2: Dialect Intelligibility ........................................................................... 62 3.3.3 Task 3: Dialect Attitudes .................................................................................. 62 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 63 4.1 TASK 1: DIALECT DISCRIMINATION ......................................................................... 64 4.2 TASK 2: DIALECT INTELLIGIBILITY .......................................................................... 67 4.3 TASK 3: DIALECT ATTITUDES .................................................................................. 69 4.4 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 73 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ............................................................................ 74 5.1 TASK 1: DIALECT DISCRIMINATION ......................................................................... 74 5.2 TASK 2: DIALECT INTELLIGIBILITY .......................................................................... 76 5.3 TASK 3: DIALECT ATTITUDES .................................................................................. 79 5.4 IMPLICATIONS .......................................................................................................... 83 5.5 LIMITATIONS OF CURRENT STUDY ........................................................................... 85 5.5 OTHER AREAS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH ................................................................... 86 5.6 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 87 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 88 vi APPENDIX A: LANGUAGE QUESTIONNAIRE .................................................................... 88 APPENDIX B: TRANSCRIPTIONS OF WENKERSÄTZE FROM DIALECT DISCRIMINATION TASK ....................................................................................................................................... 89 APPENDIX C: DIALECT INTELLIGIBILITY AUDIO RECORDINGS ....................................... 98 APPENDIX D: DIALECT INTELLIGIBILITY MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS .................... 104 APPENDIX E: DIALECT ATTITUDES AUDIO RECORDINGS ............................................. 107 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handout 1: the History of the English Language 1. Proto-Indo-European
    Handout 1: The history of the English language Cold climate: they had a word for snow: *sneigwh- (cf. Latin nix, Greek Seminar English Historical Linguistics and Dialectology, Andrew McIntyre niphos, Gothic snaiws, Gaelic sneachta). Words for beech, birch, elm, ash, oak, apple, cherry; bee, bear, beaver, eagle. 1. Proto-Indo-European (roughly 3500-2500 BC) Original location is also deduced from subsequent spread of IE languages. Bronze age technology. They had gold, silver, copper, but not iron. 1.1. Proto-Indo-European and linguistic reconstruction They rode horses and had domesticated sheep, cattle. Cattle a sign of wealth (cf. Most languages in Europe, and others in areas stretching as far as India, are called Indo- fee/German Vieh ‘cattle’, Latin pecunia ‘money’/pecus ‘cattle’) European languages, as they descend from a language called Proto-Indo-European Agriculture: cultivated cereals *gre-no- (>grain, corn), also grinding of corn (PIE). Here ‘proto’ means that there are no surviving texts in the language and thus that *mela- (cf. mill, meal); they also seem to have had ploughs and yokes. linguists reconstructed the language by comparing similarities and systematic differences Wheels and wagons (wheel < kw(e)-kwlo < kwel ‘go around’) between the languages descended from it. Religion: priests, polytheistic with sun worship *deiw-os ‘shine’ cf. Lat. deus, Gk. The table below gives examples of historically related words in different languages which Zeus, Sanskrit deva. Patriarchal, cf. Zeus pater, Iupiter, Sanskr. dyaus pitar. show either similarities in pronunciation, or systematic differences. Example: most IE Trade/exchange:*do- yields Lat. donare ‘give’ and a Hittite word meaning ‘take’, languages have /p/ in the first two lines, suggesting that PIE originally had /p/ in these *nem- > German nehmen ‘take’ but in Gk.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Languages and Language Standards
    Standard Languages and Language Standards Gramley, WS 2008-09 Yiddish Divisions of Jewry Sephardim: Spanish-Portugese Jews (and exiled Jews from there) As(h)kinazim: German (or northern European) Jews Mizrhim: Northern African and Arabian Jews "Jewish" languages Commonly formed from the vernacular languages of the larger communities in which Jews lived. Ghettoization and self-segregation led to differences between the local vernaculars and Jews varieties of these languages. Linguistically different because of the addition of Hebrew words, such as meshuga, makhazor (prayer book for the High Holy Days), or beis hakneses (synagogue) Among the best known such languages are Yiddish and Ladino (the Balkans, esp. Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, the Maghreb – Sephardic Jews expelled from Spain and Portugal in 1492). In biblical times the Jews spoke Hebrew, then Aramaic, later Greek (and so on). Today Hebrew has been revived in the form of Ivrit (= Modern Hebrew). We will be looking at Yiddish. ( ייִדיש) Yiddish The focus on Yiddish is concerned chiefly with the period prior to the Second World War and the Holocaust. Yiddish existed as a language with a wide spread of dialects: Western Yiddish • Northwestern: Northern Germany and the Netherlands • Midwestern: Central Germany • Southwestern: Southern Germany, France (including Judea-Alsatian), Northern Italy Eastern Yiddish This was the larger of the two branches, and without further explanation is what is most often meant when referring to Yiddish. • Northeastern or Litvish: the Baltic states, Belarus • Mideastern or Poylish: Poland and Central Europe • Southeastern or Ukrainish: Ukraine and the Balkans • Hungarian: Austro-Hungarian Empire Standardization The move towards standardization was concentrated most importantly in the first half of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpora and (The Need For) Other Methods in a Study of Lancashire Dialect
    ZAA 54.1 (2006): s1-sn © WILLEM HOLLMANN AND ANNA SIEWIERSKA Corpora and (the need for) other methods in a study of Lancashire dialect Abstract: This paper is based on a nascent project on Lancashire dialect grammar, which aims to describe the relevant features of this dialect and to engage with related theoretical and methodological debates. We show how corpora allow one to arrive at more precise descriptions of the data than was previously possible. But we also draw attention to the need for other methods, in particular modern elicitation tasks and attitude questionnaires developed in perceptual dialectology. Combining these methods promises to provide more insight into both more general theoretical issues and the exact nature of the object of study, namely Lancashire dialect. 1. Introduction This paper describes a nascent project on the grammar of Lancashire dialect. In line with the theme of this issue we focus on methodological issues, in particular matters concerning the use of corpora, both advantages and challenges. Section 2 presents some background information about the aims of the project, situating it within the recent surge in interest in dialect grammar. Section 3 offers an illustration of the in- sights that may be obtained from using corpora as well as the limitations of corpus studies, with reference to three ditransitive constructions. Section 4 shifts the stage to two other variables we have started to analyse, namely agreement in past tense BE and the presence, reduction or omission of the definite article. We will argue for the use of an additional data collection method, viz. modern elicitation tasks (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual Dialectology and GIS in Kurdish 1
    Perceptual Dialectology and GIS in Kurdish 1 Full title: A perceptual dialectological approach to linguistic variation and spatial analysis of Kurdish varieties Main Author: Eva Eppler, PhD, RCSLT, Mag. Phil Reader/Associate Professor in Linguistics Department of Media, Culture and Language University of Roehampton | London | SW15 5SL [email protected] | www.roehampton.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0) 20 8392 3791 Co-author: Josef Benedikt, PhD, Mag.rer.nat. Independent Scholar, Senior GIS Researcher GeoLogic Dr. Benedikt Roegergasse 11/18 1090 Vienna, Austria [email protected] | www.geologic.at Short Title: Perceptual Dialectology and GIS in Kurdish Perceptual Dialectology and GIS in Kurdish 2 Abstract: This paper presents results of a first investigation into Kurdish linguistic varieties and their spatial distribution. Kurdish dialects are used across five nation states in the Middle East and only one, Sorani, has official status in one of them. The study employs the ‘draw-a-map task’ established in Perceptual Dialectology; the analysis is supported by Geographical Information Systems (GIS). The results show that, despite the geolinguistic and geopolitical situation, Kurdish respondents have good knowledge of the main varieties of their language (Kurmanji, Sorani and the related variety Zazaki) and where to localize them. Awareness of the more diverse Southern Kurdish varieties is less definitive. This indicates that the Kurdish language plays a role in identity formation, but also that smaller isolated varieties are not only endangered in terms of speakers, but also in terms of their representations in Kurds’ mental maps of the linguistic landscape they live in. Acknowledgments: This work was supported by a Santander and by Ede & Ravenscroft Research grant 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shared Lexicon of Baltic, Slavic and Germanic
    THE SHARED LEXICON OF BALTIC, SLAVIC AND GERMANIC VINCENT F. VAN DER HEIJDEN ******** Thesis for the Master Comparative Indo-European Linguistics under supervision of prof.dr. A.M. Lubotsky Universiteit Leiden, 2018 Table of contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Background topics 3 2.1. Non-lexical similarities between Baltic, Slavic and Germanic 3 2.2. The Prehistory of Balto-Slavic and Germanic 3 2.2.1. Northwestern Indo-European 3 2.2.2. The Origins of Baltic, Slavic and Germanic 4 2.3. Possible substrates in Balto-Slavic and Germanic 6 2.3.1. Hunter-gatherer languages 6 2.3.2. Neolithic languages 7 2.3.3. The Corded Ware culture 7 2.3.4. Temematic 7 2.3.5. Uralic 9 2.4. Recapitulation 9 3. The shared lexicon of Baltic, Slavic and Germanic 11 3.1. Forms that belong to the shared lexicon 11 3.1.1. Baltic-Slavic-Germanic forms 11 3.1.2. Baltic-Germanic forms 19 3.1.3. Slavic-Germanic forms 24 3.2. Forms that do not belong to the shared lexicon 27 3.2.1. Indo-European forms 27 3.2.2. Forms restricted to Europe 32 3.2.3. Possible Germanic borrowings into Baltic and Slavic 40 3.2.4. Uncertain forms and invalid comparisons 42 4. Analysis 48 4.1. Morphology of the forms 49 4.2. Semantics of the forms 49 4.2.1. Natural terms 49 4.2.2. Cultural terms 50 4.3. Origin of the forms 52 5. Conclusion 54 Abbreviations 56 Bibliography 57 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dialect Perception and Attitudes to Variation Dennis R. Preston Department of Linguistics, German, Slavic, Asian, and African La
    Dialect Perception and Attitudes to Variation Dennis R. Preston Department of Linguistics, German, Slavic, Asian, and African Languages Gregory C. Robinson Department of Audiology and Speech Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824, USA [email protected] [email protected] I. Language and People It is perhaps the least surprising thing imaginable to find that attitudes towards languages and their varieties seem to be tied to attitudes towards groups of people. Some groups are believed to be decent, hard-working, and intelligent (and so is their language or variety); some groups are believed to be laid-back, romantic, and devil-may-care (and so is their language or variety); some groups are believed to be lazy, insolent, and procrastinating (and so is their language or variety); some groups are believed to be hard-nosed, aloof, and unsympathetic (and so is their language or variety), and so on. For the folk mind, such correlations are obvious, reaching down even into the linguistic details of the language or variety itself. Germans are harsh; just listen to their harsh, gutteral consonants. US Southerners are laid-back and lazy; just listen to their lazy, drawled vowels. Lower-status speakers are unintelligent; they don’t even understand that two negatives make a positive, and so on. Edwards summarizes this correlation for many social psychologists when he notes that ‘ … people’s reactions to language varieties reveal much of their perception of the speakers of these varieties’ (1982:20). In the clinical fields of speech-language pathology and audiology, these perceptions can have major implications. Negative attitudes about the individuals who use certain linguistic features can pervade service delivery causing testing bias, overrepresentation of minorities and nonmainstream dialect speakers in special education, and lack of linguistic confidence in children.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syllable Structure of Bangla in Optimality Theory and Its Application to the Analysis of Verbal Inflectional Paradigms in Distributed Morphology
    The syllable structure of Bangla in Optimality Theory and its application to the analysis of verbal inflectional paradigms in Distributed Morphology von Somdev Kar Philosophische Dissertation angenommen von der Neuphilologischen Fakultät der Universität Tübingen am 09. Januar 2009 Tübingen 2009 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Neuphilologischen Fakultät der Universität Tübingen Hauptberichterstatter : Prof. Hubert Truckenbrodt, Ph.D. Mitberichterstatter : PD Dr. Ingo Hertrich Dekan : Prof. Dr. Joachim Knape ii To my parents... iii iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I owe a great debt of gratitude to Prof. Hubert Truckenbrodt who was extremely kind to agree to be my research adviser and to help me to formulate this work. His invaluable guidance, suggestions, feedbacks and above all his robust optimism steered me to come up with this study. Prof. Probal Dasgupta (ISI) and Prof. Gautam Sengupta (HCU) provided insightful comments that have given me a different perspective to various linguistic issues of Bangla. I thank them for their valuable time and kind help to me. I thank Prof. Sengupta, Dr. Niladri Sekhar Dash and CIIL, Mysore for their help, cooperation and support to access the Bangla corpus I used in this work. In this connection I thank Armin Buch (Tübingen) who worked on the extraction of data from the raw files of the corpus used in this study. And, I wish to thank Ronny Medda, who read a draft of this work with much patience and gave me valuable feedbacks. Many people have helped in different ways. I would like to express my sincere thanks and gratefulness to Prof. Josef Bayer for sending me some important literature, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • German Dialects in Kansas and Missouri Scholarworks User Guide August, 2020
    German Dialects in Kansas and Missouri ScholarWorks User Guide August, 2020 Table of Contents INTERVIEW METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................. 1 THE RECORDINGS ................................................................................................................................................. 2 THE SPEAKERS ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 KANSAS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 MISSOURI .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 THE QUESTIONNAIRES ......................................................................................................................................... 5 WENKER SENTENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 KU QUESTIONNAIRE ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 REFERENCE MAPS FOR LOCATING POTENTIAL SPEAKERS .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTORY GRAMMAR of OLD ENGLISH Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies
    AN INTRODUCTORY GRAMMAR OF OLD ENGLISH MEDievaL AND Renaissance Texts anD STUDies VOLUME 463 MRTS TEXTS FOR TEACHING VOLUme 8 An Introductory Grammar of Old English with an Anthology of Readings by R. D. Fulk Tempe, Arizona 2014 © Copyright 2020 R. D. Fulk This book was originally published in 2014 by the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies at Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona. When the book went out of print, the press kindly allowed the copyright to revert to the author, so that this corrected reprint could be made freely available as an Open Access book. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE viii ABBREVIATIONS ix WORKS CITED xi I. GRAMMAR INTRODUCTION (§§1–8) 3 CHAP. I (§§9–24) Phonology and Orthography 8 CHAP. II (§§25–31) Grammatical Gender • Case Functions • Masculine a-Stems • Anglo-Frisian Brightening and Restoration of a 16 CHAP. III (§§32–8) Neuter a-Stems • Uses of Demonstratives • Dual-Case Prepositions • Strong and Weak Verbs • First and Second Person Pronouns 21 CHAP. IV (§§39–45) ō-Stems • Third Person and Reflexive Pronouns • Verbal Rection • Subjunctive Mood 26 CHAP. V (§§46–53) Weak Nouns • Tense and Aspect • Forms of bēon 31 CHAP. VI (§§54–8) Strong and Weak Adjectives • Infinitives 35 CHAP. VII (§§59–66) Numerals • Demonstrative þēs • Breaking • Final Fricatives • Degemination • Impersonal Verbs 40 CHAP. VIII (§§67–72) West Germanic Consonant Gemination and Loss of j • wa-, wō-, ja-, and jō-Stem Nouns • Dipthongization by Initial Palatal Consonants 44 CHAP. IX (§§73–8) Proto-Germanic e before i and j • Front Mutation • hwā • Verb-Second Syntax 48 CHAP.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunsrik-Xraywe.!A!New!Way!In!Lexicography!Of!The!German! Language!Island!In!Southern!Brazil!
    Dialectologia.!Special-issue,-IV-(2013),!147+180.!! ISSN:!2013+2247! Received!4!June!2013.! Accepted!30!August!2013.! ! ! ! ! HUNSRIK-XRAYWE.!A!NEW!WAY!IN!LEXICOGRAPHY!OF!THE!GERMAN! LANGUAGE!ISLAND!IN!SOUTHERN!BRAZIL! Mateusz$MASELKO$ Austrian$Academy$of$Sciences,$Institute$of$Corpus$Linguistics$and$Text$Technology$ (ICLTT),$Research$Group$DINAMLEX$(Vienna,$Austria)$ [email protected]$ $ $ Abstract$$ Written$approaches$for$orally$traded$dialects$can$always$be$seen$controversial.$One$could$say$ that$there$are$as$many$forms$of$writing$a$dialect$as$there$are$speakers$of$that$dialect.$This$is$not$only$ true$ for$ the$ different$ dialectal$ varieties$ of$ German$ that$ exist$ in$ Europe,$ but$ also$ in$ dialect$ language$ islands$ on$ other$ continents$ such$ as$ the$ Riograndese$ Hunsrik$ in$ Brazil.$ For$ the$ standardization$ of$ a$ language$ variety$ there$ must$ be$ some$ determined,$ general$ norms$ regarding$ orthography$ and$ graphemics.!Equipe!Hunsrik$works$on$the$standardization,$expansion,$and$dissemination$of$the$German$ dialect$ variety$ spoken$ in$ Rio$ Grande$ do$ Sul$ (South$ Brazil).$ The$ main$ concerns$ of$ the$ project$ are$ the$ insertion$of$Riograndese$Hunsrik$as$official$community$language$of$Rio$Grande$do$Sul$that$is$also$taught$ at$school.$Therefore,$the$project$team$from$Santa$Maria$do$Herval$developed$a$writing$approach$that$is$ based$on$the$Portuguese$grapheme$inventory.$It$is$used$in$the$picture$dictionary! Meine!ëyerste!100! Hunsrik! wërter$ (2010).$ This$ article$ discusses$ the$ picture$ dictionary$
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen an Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Pronunciation In
    University of Groningen An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Pronunciation in Swedish Dialects Leinonen, Therese IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2010 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Leinonen, T. (2010). An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Pronunciation in Swedish Dialects. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 01-10-2021 Chapter 2 Background In this chapter the linguistic and theoretical background for the thesis is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Diversity Linguistics: Language Inventories and Atlases
    Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 15 Reflections on Language Documentation 20 Years after Himmelmann 1998 ed. by Bradley McDonnell, Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker & Gary Holton, pp. 122–131 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ 12 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24814 Reflections on diversity linguistics: Language inventories and atlases Sebastian Drude University of Iceland Goethe-Universität Frankfurt This contribution gives a short overview of “language inventorying”: research aiming at creating comprehensive catalogues and atlases of all the languages in the world, which has seen a boost with the renewed interest in linguistic diversity triggered by the awareness of language endangerment in the 1990s. By focusing on the development of the ISO standard 639 and SIL’s Ethnologue, the main advances and issues in this area are discussed. The overview concludes by presenting the major alternative resources, in particular Glottolog. The label “diversity linguistics” has been introduced by Martin Haspelmath and others at the Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig.1 To my knowledge, it was first used in the context of the final conference of that institute’s department of linguistics (MPI-EVA 2015). Now there exist a number of activities under this label, including a book series “Studies in Diversity Linguistics” (Haspelmath 2014ff). In a broad sense, the term designates those branches of linguistics that show interest in the diversity of languages, their structure and relationship: descriptive linguistics (especially of previously understudied languages, often in a fieldwork setting), language typology, and comparative linguistics. Language Documentation is included in or at least a close neighbor to this group.
    [Show full text]