DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1610.01501V1 [Hep-Th] 30 Sep 2016 Foreword

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

\Hawking Radiation" Conference Manuscript 2015 Laura Mersini-Houghton∗ and Dillon N. Morse∗ ∗Department of Physics and Astronomy, UNC-Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA arXiv:1610.01501v1 [hep-th] 30 Sep 2016 Foreword The origin of Hawking radiation and the perplexing problem of information loss in black holes has been at the center of decades of discussions. Recently the subject has seen renewed interest as new ideas, approaches and paradoxes have been suggested. Progress in our understanding of this mystery has far reaching conse- quences on all aspects of theoretical physics, from cosmology to quantum gravity. These are what motivated my decision to bring together the leading experts and the founding fathers of this field, for a week-long working session of concentrated effort focused on stimulating progress in the topic. Everyone I contacted enthusiastically agreed with this initiative. That is how the Hawking Radiation conference came about. Due to Stephen Hawkings difficulty with travelling to the USA, we had to hold the conference in Europe instead of in Chapel Hill, USA. I am especially indebted to Nordita, that together with KTH Royal Swedish Institute and Stockholm University, graciously offered to co-host us and co-sponsor the conference with UNC-Chapel Hill. UNC-Chapel Hill leadership, from the Chancellors office, the Provosts office and the Deans office for the College of Arts and Science, fully encouraged and supported this initiative from the beginning. Despite the difficulties that prevented us from holding the conference in Chapel Hill, they decided to bring Chapel Hill to the conference, wherever it was held. The Chancellor Carol Folt, Vice Chancellor for University Development David Routh, Executive Vice Provost and Chief International Officer Ronald P. Strauss, the Dean of the College of Arts and Science Kevin Guskiewicz, and a full team of support from UNC-Chapel Hill, flew to Stockholm to help with all aspects of the organization, to extend Chapel Hills hospitality, and, to welcome the conference participants, through a series of events that included a public lecture by S. Hawking. I am very grateful to them for their support and commitment to the advancement of science. I would like to thank the UNC Global director and her staff, and the UNC Department of Communications, who offered continuous help both, during the organizing of the conference, and in the work needed afterwards in compressing, archiving and posting the video recording. I would like to thank the Rektor of KTH, Peter Gudmundson, and vice Rektor of Stockholm University, Astrid Soderbergh Widding, for their warm welcome and hospitality. The conference was sponsored by UNC-Chapel Hill, Nordita, DAMTP Cambridge University, and the Julian Schwinger Foundation. I am grateful to Yen Chin Ong at Nordita and Malcolm J. Perry at DAMTP Cambridge University from the organizing committee, the director of Nordita Katie Freese, and to Katrin Morck and Philip von Segebaden at KTH, for their help with all aspects of the conference, and especially to my student, Dillon Morse at UNC-Chapel Hill, for transcribing the video recording. I would also like to thank my two colleagues at UNC, Jack Ng and Steve Christensen for offering their support, including help with editing the transcript. The Hawking Radiation conference, which took place August 24-30 2015, was a special and historic event that brought together founding fathers of modern physics. We are making the video recording of the whole week of talks and discussions and the proceedings here, publicly available. We have here recorded the week long talks and discussions in the hope of sharing the results, discussions, debates, enthusiasm, and ideas that came up during the conference, with those interested in the field, especially the current and future young researchers. We hope that reading this material will make every researcher feel they are participating in the conference. The video recording of this proceeding can be accessed here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJC1iUpAADPKTZuyk0lwWWQ9LRJpiRgUv We have tried to stay as close as possible to the recorded words of each speaker. Due to technical difficulties and financial limitations that allowed for only one camera recording, there may be a few minutes or sentences missing here and there, for example if a participant did not use the microphones provided. 1 Any statements in this transcript are exclusively the property of the individual speaker. If used elsewhere, they should be quoted accordingly and have the explicit permission of the speaker. You will notice that the voice of one special person, Jacob Bekenstein, the man who helped lay the foundations of the field, a friend and a scientist I greatly admired, is missing. He passed away a few days before the conference. I would like to dedicate this report to his memory. Laura Mersini-Houghton Department of Physics and Astronomy UNC-Chapel Hill 2 HAWKING RADIATION AUGUST , STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN The world’s leading physicists will gather in Stockholm CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS: for a week-long workshop on fundamental topics in Stephen Hawking James M. Bardeen black holes, in particular the origin of Hawking Philip Candelas radiation, existence of singularities, and information loss. Steve Christensen Ulf Danielsson The workshop is bringing together eminent Paul Davies Fay Dowker scientists who laid the foundations of the fi eld to Michael Du debate the diversity of views on this notoriously Larry Ford Katherine Freese di cult and important topic in physics at present— Stephen Fulling Werner Israel and to make progress toward a solution and clear Claus Kiefer direction for the fi eld. Jorma Louko Laura Mersini-Houghton Charles W. Misner INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZING COMMITTEE: Paulo Vargas Moniz Laura Mersini-Houghton, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Emil Mottola Jack Ng Malcolm J. Perry, DAMTP, Cambridge University Jérôme Novak Yen Chin Ong, Nordita Leonard Parker Malcolm J. Perry Co-sponsored by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Nordic Carlo Rovelli Institute of Theoretical Physics, the Stephen Hawking Centre for Theoretical Philippe Spindel Physics at the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at Kellogg Stelle the University of Cambridge, and The Julian Schwinger Foundation. Leo Stodolsky In association with this conference, Stephen Hawking will present the public lecture Andrew Strominger “Quantum Black Holes” on August 24 at 7 p.m. at the Stockholm Waterfront Gerard t’Hooft Congress Centre. Tickets can be purchased online at HAWKING.AXACO.SE. Francesca Vidotto PHOTO COURTESY NASA COURTESY PHOTO Contents 1 Opening Remarks 8 2 Monday, August 24 2015 Convener: J. Ng 10 2.1 Backreaction and Conformal Symmetry Gerard 't Hooft ............................................ 11 2.2 Backreaction of Hawking Radiation and Singularities Laura Mersini-Houghton ....................................... 18 2.3 Physical Interpretation of the Semi-Classical Energy-Momentum Tensor James Bardeen ............................................ 27 3 Tuesday, August 25 2015 Convener: L. Mersini-Houghton 34 3.1 The Information Paradox Stephen Hawking ........................................... 35 3.2 Black Hole Memory Malcolm Perry ............................................ 39 3.3 Black to White Hole Tunnelling: Before or After Hawking Radiation? Carlo Rovelli ............................................. 49 3.4 A new Quantum Black Hole Phenomenology Francesca Vidotto ........................................... 53 4 Wednesday, August 26 2015 Convener: F. Vidotto 58 4.1 Black Holes as Open Quantum Systems Claus Kiefer .............................................. 59 4.2 Particle Creation From Vacuum in Gravitational Expansion and Collapse Leonard Parker ............................................ 66 4.3 Gravitational Condensate Stars or What's the (Quantum) Matter with Black Holes Emil Mottola ............................................. 69 5 Thursday, August 27 2015 Convener: P. Moniz 75 5.1 Did the Chicken Survive the Firewall Jorma Louko ............................................. 76 5.2 Black Hole Evaporation and Classical Gravitational Waves: Comparison of Calculation Tech- niques Bernard Whiting ........................................... 78 5.3 Gravity = (Yang-Mills)^2 Michael Duff ............................................. 83 5.4 Black Holes and Other Solutions in Higher Derivative Gravity Kellogg Stelle ............................................. 85 6 Friday, August 28 2015 Convener: L. Ford 88 6.1 Quantum Damping or Decoherence. Lessons from Molecules, Neutrinos, and Quantum Logic Devices Leo Stodolsky ............................................. 89 6.2 Puzzle Pieces: Do Any Fit? Charles Misner ............................................ 91 4 6.3 The Generalized Second Law and the Unity of Physics Fay Dowker .............................................. 99 7 Saturday, August 29 2015 Convener: L Mersini-Houghton 104 7.1 Wrap-up Discussion S. Fulling ............................................... 105 7.2 Status Report Stephen Hawking ........................................... 117 7.3 Concluding Remarks Paul Davies .............................................. 118 7.4 A Tribute to Stephen Hawking Michael Duff ............................................. 125 8 Closing Remarks 126 9 References 127 5 Group Photos Listed left to right. Back Row: Jorma Louko, Malcolm Perry, Ulf Danielsson, Emil Mottola, Philippe Spindel, Michael Duff, Bernard Whiting, J´er^omeNovak Middle Row: Francesca Vidotto,
Recommended publications
  • Elementary Explanation of the Inexistence of Decoherence at Zero

    Elementary Explanation of the Inexistence of Decoherence at Zero

    Elementary explanation of the inexistence of decoherence at zero temperature for systems with purely elastic scattering Yoseph Imry Dept. of Condensed-Matter Physics, the Weizmann Institute of science, Rehovot 76100, Israel (Dated: October 31, 2018) This note has no new results and is therefore not intended to be submitted to a ”research” journal in the foreseeable future, but to be available to the numerous individuals who are interested in this issue. Several of those have approached the author for his opinion, which is summarized here in a hopefully pedagogical manner, for convenience. It is demonstrated, using essentially only energy conservation and elementary quantum mechanics, that true decoherence by a normal environment approaching the zero-temperature limit is impossible for a test particle which can not give or lose energy. Prime examples are: Bragg scattering, the M¨ossbauer effect and related phenomena at zero temperature, as well as quantum corrections for the transport of conduction electrons in solids. The last example is valid within the scattering formulation for the transport. Similar statements apply also to interference properties in equilibrium. PACS numbers: 73.23.Hk, 73.20.Dx ,72.15.Qm, 73.21.La I. INTRODUCTION cally in the case of the coupling of a conduction-electron in a solid to lattice vibrations (phonons) 14 years ago [5] and immediately refuted vigorously [6]. Interest in this What diminishes the interference of, say, two waves problem has resurfaced due to experiments by Mohanty (see Eq. 1 below) is an interesting fundamental ques- et al [7] which determine the dephasing rate of conduc- tion, some aspects of which are, surprisingly, still being tion electrons by weak-localization magnetoconductance debated.
  • Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will Yakir Aharonov Chapman University, Aharonov@Chapman.Edu

    Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will Yakir Aharonov Chapman University, [email protected]

    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science Science and Technology Faculty Articles and Faculty Articles and Research Research 2016 Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will Yakir Aharonov Chapman University, [email protected] Eliahu Cohen Tel Aviv University Tomer Shushi University of Haifa Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/scs_articles Part of the Quantum Physics Commons Recommended Citation Aharonov, Y., Cohen, E., & Shushi, T. (2016). Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will. Quanta, 5(1), 53-60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12743/quanta.v5i1.44 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Science and Technology Faculty Articles and Research at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science Faculty Articles and Research by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will Comments This article was originally published in Quanta, volume 5, issue 1, in 2016. DOI: 10.12743/quanta.v5i1.44 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This article is available at Chapman University Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/scs_articles/334 Accommodating Retrocausality with Free Will Yakir Aharonov 1;2, Eliahu Cohen 1;3 & Tomer Shushi 4 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Schmid College of Science, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Geometric Phase from Aharonov-Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and Beyond

    Geometric Phase from Aharonov-Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and Beyond

    Geometric phase from Aharonov-Bohm to Pancharatnam–Berry and beyond Eliahu Cohen1,2,*, Hugo Larocque1, Frédéric Bouchard1, Farshad Nejadsattari1, Yuval Gefen3, Ebrahim Karimi1,* 1Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada 2Faculty of Engineering and the Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel 3Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel *Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Whenever a quantum system undergoes a cycle governed by a slow change of parameters, it acquires a phase factor: the geometric phase. Its most common formulations are known as the Aharonov-Bohm, Pancharatnam and Berry phases, but both prior and later manifestations exist. Though traditionally attributed to the foundations of quantum mechanics, the geometric phase has been generalized and became increasingly influential in many areas from condensed-matter physics and optics to high energy and particle physics and from fluid mechanics to gravity and cosmology. Interestingly, the geometric phase also offers unique opportunities for quantum information and computation. In this Review we first introduce the Aharonov-Bohm effect as an important realization of the geometric phase. Then we discuss in detail the broader meaning, consequences and realizations of the geometric phase emphasizing the most important mathematical methods and experimental techniques used in the study of geometric phase, in particular those related to recent works in optics and condensed-matter physics. Published in Nature Reviews Physics 1, 437–449 (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s42254-019-0071-1 1. Introduction A charged quantum particle is moving through space.
  • Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering The

    Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering The

    Annual Report to Industry Canada Covering the Objectives, Activities and Finances for the period August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 and Statement of Objectives for Next Year and the Future Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics 31 Caroline Street North Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5 Table of Contents Pages Period A. August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 Objectives, Activities and Finances 2-52 Statement of Objectives, Introduction Objectives 1-12 with Related Activities and Achievements Financial Statements, Expenditures, Criteria and Investment Strategy Period B. August 1, 2009 and Beyond Statement of Objectives for Next Year and Future 53-54 1 Statement of Objectives Introduction In 2008-9, the Institute achieved many important objectives of its mandate, which is to advance pure research in specific areas of theoretical physics, and to provide high quality outreach programs that educate and inspire the Canadian public, particularly young people, about the importance of basic research, discovery and innovation. Full details are provided in the body of the report below, but it is worth highlighting several major milestones. These include: In October 2008, Prof. Neil Turok officially became Director of Perimeter Institute. Dr. Turok brings outstanding credentials both as a scientist and as a visionary leader, with the ability and ambition to position PI among the best theoretical physics research institutes in the world. Throughout the last year, Perimeter Institute‘s growing reputation and targeted recruitment activities led to an increased number of scientific visitors, and rapid growth of its research community. Chart 1. Growth of PI scientific staff and associated researchers since inception, 2001-2009.
  • What Atheist Steven Hawking Has Discovered at All, If Black Holes Do Not Evaporate?

    What Atheist Steven Hawking Has Discovered at All, If Black Holes Do Not Evaporate?

    What atheist Steven Hawking has discovered at all, if Black Holes do not evaporate? Dmitri Martila Tartu University (2004{2011), Estonia∗ (Dated: December 8, 2020) Abstract It is the severe scientific criticism against Hawking's life work. One of the issues is the following. The evaporation of the Black Holes is impossible at first because of Steven Hawking's sentence in his original paper that the Schwarzschild Black Hole does not evaporate. We have no other spherical symmetric Black Hole, which would have an event horizon, and what shrinks despite that. ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 I. HISTORY OF MY UNDERSTANDING The evaporation of a Black Hole leads to the Paradox of Information Loss. So maybe Stephen Hawking has made a fatal mistake introducing Hawking Radiation? \Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" (the Sagan standard) was a phrase popularized by Carl Sagan. However, the roots of this phrase are much older, with the French mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace stating that \. the weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness." The alleged Loss of Information is an absurd consequence of Steven Hawking's extraordinary thesis that \Black Holes do evaporate". Well, I still do not understand how the Black Hole can evaporate. Black Holes are obtained as the end products of a collapse (in other words: gravitational compression) of supernova matter. However, during the collapse, there is no event horizon. According to Hawking, evaporation does not occur at the most final stage of the collapse of a star, but it performs already during the collapse (according to Ref.
  • David Bohn, Roger Penrose, and the Search for Non-Local Causality

    David Bohn, Roger Penrose, and the Search for Non-Local Causality

    David Bohm, Roger Penrose, and the Search for Non-local Causality Before they met, David Bohm and Roger Penrose each puzzled over the paradox of the arrow of time. After they met, the case for projective physical space became clearer. *** A machine makes pairs (I like to think of them as shoes); one of the pair goes into storage before anyone can look at it, and the other is sent down a long, long hallway. At the end of the hallway, a physicist examines the shoe.1 If the physicist finds a left hiking boot, he expects that a right hiking boot must have been placed in the storage bin previously, and upon later examination he finds that to be the case. So far, so good. The problem begins when it is discovered that the machine can make three types of shoes: hiking boots, tennis sneakers, and women’s pumps. Now the physicist at the end of the long hallway can randomly choose one of three templates, a metal sheet with a hole in it shaped like one of the three types of shoes. The physicist rolls dice to determine which of the templates to hold up; he rolls the dice after both shoes are out of the machine, one in storage and the other having started down the long hallway. Amazingly, two out of three times, the random choice is correct, and the shoe passes through the hole in the template. There can 1 This rendition of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen, 1935, delayed-choice thought experiment is paraphrased from Bernard d’Espagnat, 1981, with modifications via P.
  • Arxiv:0905.2641V1

    Arxiv:0905.2641V1

    TOPICS IN INFLATIONARY COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS by Matthew M. Glenz A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2008 arXiv:0905.2641v1 [hep-th] 16 May 2009 TOPICS IN INFLATIONARY COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS by Matthew M. Glenz A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2008 Major Professor Date Graduate School Approval Date ii ABSTRACT TOPICS IN INFLATIONARY COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS by Matthew M. Glenz The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2008 Under the Supervision of Distinguished Professor Leonard Parker We introduce a general way of modeling inflation in a framework that is indepen- dent of the exact nature of the inflationary potential. Because of the choice of our initial conditions and the continuity of the scale factor in its first two derivatives, we obtain non-divergent results without the need of any renormalization beyond what is required in Minkowski space. In particular, we assume asymptotically flat initial and final values of our scale factor that lead to an unambiguous measure of the number of particles created versus frequency. We find exact solutions to the evolution equation for inflaton perturbations when their effective mass is zero and approximate solutions when their effective mass is non-zero. We obtain results for the scale invariance of the inflaton spectrum and the size of density perturbations. Finally, we show that a substantial contribution to reheating occurs due to gravitational particle production during the exit from the inflationary stage of the universe.
  • ACCRETION INTO and EMISSION from BLACK HOLES Thesis By

    ACCRETION INTO and EMISSION from BLACK HOLES Thesis By

    ACCRETION INTO AND EMISSION FROM BLACK HOLES Thesis by Don Nelson Page In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 1976 (Submitted May 20, 1976) -ii- ACKNOHLEDG:-IENTS For everything involved during my pursuit of a Ph. D. , I praise and thank my Lord Jesus Christ, in whom "all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities--all things have been created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together" (Colossians 1: 16-17) . But He is not only the Creator and Sustainer of the universe, including the physi­ cal laws which rule and their dominion the spacetime manifold and its matter fields ; He is also my personal Savior, who was "wounded for our transgressions , ... bruised for our iniquities, .. and the Lord has lald on Him the iniquity of us all" (Isaiah 53:5-6). As the Apostle Paul expressed it shortly after Isaiah ' s prophecy had come true at least five hundred years after being written, "God demonstrates His own love tmvard us , in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5 : 8) . Christ Himself said, " I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full" (John 10:10) . Indeed Christ has given me life to the full while I have been at Caltech, and I wish to acknowledge some of the main blessings He has granted: First I thank my advisors , KipS.
  • Vancouver Institute: an Experiment in Public Education

    Vancouver Institute: an Experiment in Public Education

    1 2 The Vancouver Institute: An Experiment in Public Education edited by Peter N. Nemetz JBA Press University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6T 1Z2 1998 3 To my parents, Bel Newman Nemetz, B.A., L.L.D., 1915-1991 (Pro- gram Chairman, The Vancouver Institute, 1973-1990) and Nathan T. Nemetz, C.C., O.B.C., Q.C., B.A., L.L.D., 1913-1997 (President, The Vancouver Institute, 1960-61), lifelong adherents to Albert Einstein’s Credo: “The striving after knowledge for its own sake, the love of justice verging on fanaticism, and the quest for personal in- dependence ...”. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: 9 Peter N. Nemetz The Vancouver Institute: An Experiment in Public Education 1. Professor Carol Shields, O.C., Writer, Winnipeg 36 MAKING WORDS / FINDING STORIES 2. Professor Stanley Coren, Department of Psychology, UBC 54 DOGS AND PEOPLE: THE HISTORY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF A RELATIONSHIP 3. Professor Wayson Choy, Author and Novelist, Toronto 92 THE IMPORTANCE OF STORY: THE HUNGER FOR PERSONAL NARRATIVE 4. Professor Heribert Adam, Department of Sociology and 108 Anthropology, Simon Fraser University CONTRADICTIONS OF LIBERATION: TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION IN SOUTH AFRICA 5. Professor Harry Arthurs, O.C., Faculty of Law, Osgoode 132 Hall, York University GLOBALIZATION AND ITS DISCONTENTS 6. Professor David Kennedy, Department of History, 154 Stanford University IMMIGRATION: WHAT THE U.S. CAN LEARN FROM CANADA 7. Professor Larry Cuban, School of Education, Stanford 172 University WHAT ARE GOOD SCHOOLS, AND WHY ARE THEY SO HARD TO GET? 5 8. Mr. William Thorsell, Editor-in-Chief, The Globe and 192 Mail GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS: POWER IN CANADIAN MEDIA AND POLITICS 9.
  • Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme

    Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme

    Classical Simulations of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime I: Fermionic Hawking-Hartle Vacua from a Staggered Lattice Scheme Adam G. M. Lewis1 and Guifr´e Vidal1,2 1Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 2Y5 2X, The Moonshot Factory, Mountain View, CA 94043 We numerically compute renormalized expectation values of quadratic operators in a quantum field theory (QFT) of free Dirac fermions in curved two-dimensional (Lorentzian) spacetime. First, we use a staggered-fermion discretization to gener- ate a sequence of lattice theories yielding the desired QFT in the continuum limit. Numerically-computed lattice correlators are then used to approximate, through ex- trapolation, those in the continuum. Finally, we use so-called point-splitting regular- ization and Hadamard renormalization to remove divergences, and thus obtain finite, renormalized expectation values of quadratic operators in the continuum. As illus- trative applications, we show how to recover the Unruh effect in flat spacetime and how to compute renormalized expectation values in the Hawking-Hartle vacuum of a Schwarzschild black hole and in the Bunch-Davies vacuum of an expanding universe described by de Sitter spacetime. Although here we address a non-interacting QFT us- ing free fermion techniques, the framework described in this paper lays the groundwork for a series of subsequent studies involving simulation of interacting QFTs in curved spacetime by tensor network techniques. 1 Introduction While by now it is generally expected that black holes will radiate and evaporate [12, 27, 52] in the presence of a quantum field, the details remain murky. The specific interplay between gravity and quantum fields during the early Universe's presumed inflationary [2, 24, 36, 48] phase is similarly unclear.
  • 2. Superoscillations.Pdf

    2. Superoscillations.Pdf

    When the Whole Vibrates Faster than Any of its Parts Computational Superoscillation Theory Nicholas Wheeler December 2017 Introduction. The phenomenon/theory of “superoscillations”—brought to my attention by my friend Ahmed Sebbar1—originated in the time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics2 that gave rise to the theory of “weak measurements.” Recognition of the role that superoscillations play in that work was brought into explicit focus by Aharonov et al in 1990, and since that date the concept has found application to a remarkable variety of physical subject areas. Yakir Aharonov took his PhD in 1960 from the University of Bristol, where he worked with David Bohm.3 In 1992 a conference was convened at Bristol to celebrate Aharonov’s 60th birthday. It was on that occasion that the superoscillation phenomenon came first to the attention of Michael Berry (of the Bristol faculty), who in an essay “Faster than Fourier” contributed to the proceedings of that conference4 wrote that “He [Aharonov] told me that it is possible for functions to oscillate faster than any of their Fourier components. This seemed unbelievable, even paradoxical; I had heard nothing like it before. ” Berry was inspired to write a series of papers relating to the theory of superoscillation and its potential applications, as also by now have a great many other authors. 1 Private communication, 17 November 2017. 2 Y. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann & J. L. Libowitz, “Time symmetry in the quantum meassurement process,” Phys. Rev. B 134, 1410–1416 (1964). 3 It was, I suspect, at the invitation of E. P Gross—who had collaborated with Bohm when both were at Princeton—that Aharonov spent 1960–1961 at Brandeis University, from which I had taken the first PhD and departed to Utrecht/CERN in February of 1960, so we never met.
  • Arxiv:1702.07132V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 23 Feb 2017 Letenti’ Hoyo Eea Eaiiy H Uni- the Relativity, General of Theory Einstein’S Albert Observations New with Creation

    Arxiv:1702.07132V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 23 Feb 2017 Letenti’ Hoyo Eea Eaiiy H Uni- the Relativity, General of Theory Einstein’S Albert Observations New with Creation

    Fifty years of cosmological particle creation Leonard Parker1, ∗ and Jos´eNavarro-Salas2, † 1Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Kenwood Integrated Research Complex, 3135 North Maryland Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA. 2Departamento de Fisica Teorica and IFIC, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC. Facultad de Fisica, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot-46100, Valencia, Spain. (Dated: February 24, 2017) In the early sixties Leonard Parker discovered that the expansion of the universe can create particles out of the vacuum, opening a new and fruitfull field in physics. We give a historical review in the form of an interview that took place during the Conference ERE2014 (Valencia 1-5, September, 2014). PACS numbers: 04.62.+v I. PREAMBLE versity of Valencia hosted the Conference ERE2014 (Al- most 100 Years after Einstein’s Revolution) during the Prof. Parker is the pioneer of the theory of quantized first week of September. Prof. Parker delivered a talk on fields in curved spacetime. His breakthrough discovery, the phenomena of gravitational particle creation. J. N-S in the early sixties, that the expansion of the universe can then took the opportunity to interview him about these create particles out of the vacuum opened a new field in topics from a historical and personal perspective. A very physics, with many treasures inside. This surprising re- small fraction of the interview was published in M`etode, sult was stated and analyzed with detail in his Ph.D. the magazine of the University of Valencia. We believe thesis (Harvard University, 1966) and related papers in that it will be of interest for young students and re- Physical Review Letters and Physical Review.