Arxiv:1702.07132V1 [Physics.Hist-Ph] 23 Feb 2017 Letenti’ Hoyo Eea Eaiiy H Uni- the Relativity, General of Theory Einstein’S Albert Observations New with Creation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Fifty years of cosmological particle creation Leonard Parker1, ∗ and Jos´eNavarro-Salas2, † 1Physics Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Kenwood Integrated Research Complex, 3135 North Maryland Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA. 2Departamento de Fisica Teorica and IFIC, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia-CSIC. Facultad de Fisica, Universidad de Valencia, Burjassot-46100, Valencia, Spain. (Dated: February 24, 2017) In the early sixties Leonard Parker discovered that the expansion of the universe can create particles out of the vacuum, opening a new and fruitfull field in physics. We give a historical review in the form of an interview that took place during the Conference ERE2014 (Valencia 1-5, September, 2014). PACS numbers: 04.62.+v I. PREAMBLE versity of Valencia hosted the Conference ERE2014 (Al- most 100 Years after Einstein’s Revolution) during the Prof. Parker is the pioneer of the theory of quantized first week of September. Prof. Parker delivered a talk on fields in curved spacetime. His breakthrough discovery, the phenomena of gravitational particle creation. J. N-S in the early sixties, that the expansion of the universe can then took the opportunity to interview him about these create particles out of the vacuum opened a new field in topics from a historical and personal perspective. A very physics, with many treasures inside. This surprising re- small fraction of the interview was published in M`etode, sult was stated and analyzed with detail in his Ph.D. the magazine of the University of Valencia. We believe thesis (Harvard University, 1966) and related papers in that it will be of interest for young students and re- Physical Review Letters and Physical Review. In short, searches, and also for senior scientists, to offer the longer he pulled together two basic pillars of physics: quantum and full version of the interview. mechanics and general relativity, and realized then that particles can be spontaneously produced by the expan- II. INTERVIEW: THE DISCOVERY OF sion of the universe or, in general, by a time-dependent COSMOLOGICAL PARTICLE CREATION gravitational field. Around the same time the cosmic microwave back- ground was discovered, changing completely the view of The birth of new fundamental ideas is often cosmology and reinforcing the Big-Bang theory. In 1992, very difficult. In the early sixties, even the the COBE satellite detected for the first time small fluc- novel ideas of spontaneous symmetry breaking tuations in the average temperature of 2.7 Kelvin degrees. of Brout-Englert-Higgs-Guralnik-Hagen-Kibble This has been confirmed by many other experiments, in- were initially received with skepticism by some cluding the PLANCK satellite. Quantum field theory in physicists. In current times the idea of gravita- curved spacetime and, in particular, cosmological parti- tional particle creation seems very natural, but cle creation, provides the mechanism driving primordial at the time, I guess, it was not. How did you perturbations which seeded the tiny fluctuations in tem- experience the initial reactions to the phenomena perature observed in the cosmic microwave background. of cosmological particle creation? It also helps to explain the clumping of matter that gave rise to galaxies and galactic clusters. Let me start by recalling the context of the time. In In 2014, the announcement by the BICEP2 team that 1962, at Harvard when I began my Ph.D. thesis, I wanted they had detected the so-called B-modes in the cosmic to work at the interface of general relativity and quantum arXiv:1702.07132v1 [physics.hist-ph] 23 Feb 2017 microwave background (produced by gravitons generated field theory. I had already studied general relativity quite in the very early universe) greatly excited the physics carefully as an undergraduate before coming to Harvard. community. If it had been confirmed, it would have pro- I had the good fortune to learn quantum field theory vided direct evidence of cosmological particle creation. and particle physics at Harvard from Wendell Furry, Roy This may happen in coming years with new observations Glauber (Nobel Prize 2005), Sidney Coleman, Sheldon and experiments. Glashow (Nobel Prize 1979), and Julian Schwinger (No- Because of the celebration of the centennial, in 2015, of bel Prize 1965). Albert Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, the Uni- I wanted to find new consequences of the quantum field theory of elementary particles in the context of Einstein’s theory of general relativity. At the time, I felt that quan- tizing the nonlinear gravitational field itself was so diffi- ∗ [email protected] cult that I would not be able to make significant progress † jnavarro@ific.uv.es in trying to go beyond the deep work that had already 2 been done in that area. Nevertheless, I felt that it would I completed this part of my Ph.D. Thesis at Harvard be valuable to study quantized elementary particle fields by 1964, and went on to consider spin-1/2 fields, includ- in the curved space-times that were solutions of the non- ing electrons and positrons in curved spacetime, and the linear Einstein gravitational field equations. Luckily, Sid- massless spin-1/2 neutrino field (at that time, it was not ney Coleman agreed to be my thesis advisor on such a known that there were neutrinos that had mass). I used project, which was outside the main stream of the time. the formulation that had been developed in the 1930’s I started by looking for new consequences of quantum in papers of V. Bargmann and E. Schr¨odinger for spin- field theory in the isotropically expanding cosmological 1/2 particles in curved spacetime. At the suggestion of space-times that were solutions of the nonlinear equa- my thesis adviser, Sidney Coleman, I wrote an appendix tions of general relativity. on this formulation as part of my thesis. As the articles To investigate the creation of particles by the metric of Bargmann and Schr¨odinger were in German, I went of an expanding universe in general relativity, it was first through their calculations as best I could, in my own necessary to extend the quantum field theory of elemen- way, and wrote the appendix in English. tary particles from the well-established flat Minkowski I finished my full Ph.D. Thesis at Harvard in 1966, space-time of special relativity to the context of a classi- during a time when Sidney Coleman was away in Europe cal general relativistic expanding universe with a general for a couple of years. expansion scale-factor, a(t). Some examples that I stud- ied were the dust-filled universe, the radiation-dominated This delayed the publication of your surprising universe and the exponentially-expanding universe of de- and fantastic result. Sitter, which at the time had been studied as the steady- state universe, and is now studied as the inflationary uni- As I had to wait until his return before my Thesis de- verse. I chose to first consider the spatially-flat universes fense at Harvard, I sent a copy of part of my thesis to Pro- because I felt that they were the most natural. I de- fessor Bryce S. DeWitt in early 1966, including the work veloped the quantum field theory by using the simplest on particle creation from the vacuum in the expanding generally-covariant extension of the Minkowski space- universe. DeWitt was one of the leading physicists work- time field equations, starting with the generally-covariant ing on quantum gravity, and I was impressed by an article minimally-coupled scalar-field equation. he had recently published in the Les Houches lectures of The quantum field theory in these spatially-flat ex- 1964. He was head of the Institute of Field Physics at the panding universes could be generated in a straight- University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill. He forward way by simply evolving the well established immediately invited me to give a colloquium there and quantum field theory that was already known in flat offered me a position there which started in the Fall of Minkowski space-time. The free (non-interacting) field 1966. At the time, he mentioned that I would be taking was chosen, so as not to complicate things with non- a position as a postdoc following Peter Higgs. His fa- gravitational interactions. Then smooth evolution of the mous paper on the Higgs boson was written while Higgs free field equation from an initial Minkowski space-time was a postdoc at the Institute of Field Physics. In 2011, with constant a(t) = a1 to a changing a(t) of an ex- the well known physicist, Cecile DeWitt-Morette, who panding universe (with continuous first and second time was Bryce DeWitt’s wife wrote The Pursuit of Quantum derivatives) gave the quantum field theory of the field Gravity:Memoirs of Bryce DeWitt from 1946 to 2004. in the expanding universe, where a(t) was obtained from This is an excellent book, from which I learned a number the Einstein equations of general relativity. It was then of interesting things when I reviewed it for the August straightforward to use the theorem for the most general 2011 issue of Physics Today. In particular, I learned that solution of a second-order differential equation to find Bryce DeWitt had lost much of his funding at about the that the creation and annihilation operators of the quan- time I was hired. It was only then that I understood tized field in the early-time Minkowski space-time each why I was actually hired as an Instructor by UNC with evolved, under the influence of the expansion of the uni- a teaching load of 2 courses per semester, instead of as verse, into a superposition of creation and annihilation a postdoc.