1. Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1. Introduction 1. Introduction 1.1 Context Winston Churchill once called battles “the punctuation marks of history” (Lynch and Cooksey 2007, p. 19). Names like Antietam, Culloden, Gettysburg and Hastings evoke images of triumph and glory, but also of violence and bloodshed. A battle can end an era or mark the beginning of a new one; it can even raise men to kings. Within the course of a few hours, history can be changed forever. The punctuation mark is set. But what happens after the battle has been fought? All that is left is a seemingly empty field which played an important role once. Andrew Brown of English Heritage aptly stated that if Churchill was right, “then battlefields are the fragmentary pages on which those punctuation marks were written in blood” (Sutherland 2005, p. 12). As fragments, they are rapidly erased from the shared memory until they are only remembered in local lore or completely forgotten; they can be damaged and reclaimed. If a battlefield survives as a place of importance, however, it becomes a resource to tribes, peoples and nations. The writing is resumed. Although battlefields have attracted a growing interest both from the academic world and the general public in Britain since the mid-19th century, they have only been acknowledged as heritage resources in the last decades (see App. A). Now, interpretive programmes draw hundreds of thousands of visitors to the fields per year; emerging methods and disciplines contribute to the knowledge about past conflicts. The fragments are rediscovered and reinterpreted. Management planning for fields of conflict in the United Kingdom has only partially been realised effectively. Even sites which are regarded as visitor attractions have not drawn up management plans. Guidelines have been issued, but if so, address only certain thematic areas. Thus, comprehensive guidance for the management of British battlefields is needed. This dissertation will propose a guideline framework for the compilation of management 1 plans and test it against the planning frameworks of several historic battle sites in the United Kingdom. After a theoretical review, the methodology is explained and the guideline framework introduced. Results are presented and discussed in relation to the theory. At the end, a summary draws conclusions and gives recommendations. 1.2 Targets 1.2.1 Aim of the Dissertation Historic battlefields in the United Kingdom have scarcely received attention as management entities. Now, that more and more schemes for their presentation and safeguarding are being initiated, guidance is needed. The aim of this investigation therefore is to establish and test a practical guideline framework for management planning at British historic battlefields. 1.2.2 Objectives Define British battlefields. Explain the legislative background for the protection of battlefields in the United Kingdom. Describe the current management situation of British battlefields. Develop a guideline framework for the management planning at historic battlefields. Test this framework against case studies from the United Kingdom. 1.2.3 Hypotheses The investigation aims to test the following hypotheses: 2 (i) Every British battlefield represented by an organisation needs a management plan. (ii) The presented guideline framework provides appropriate guidance for planners at British battlefields. 1.3 Background Compared to the measures undertaken in the USA or Canada (see App. B), the efforts for the professional protection and management of conflict sites in the United Kingdom are still at the very beginning. Piekarz (2007) ascribes this to a variety of reasons, such as the lack of confidence in locating the field(s). He goes on to explain that the appeal of battlefields in Britain is not as great as, for example, in the USA, because of the temporal distance and the small scale of the conflicts. Freeman (2001) observed that the opening up of battlefields as an attraction is, in most cases, connected to tourism. But a heightened interest from authorities and the general public and contributions from the academic world have, over the last decade, led to a growing professionalisation of battlefield management in the British Isles. Separate heritage registers could be introduced for English (EH 1995b) and Scottish (HS 2011b) battlefields. During their compilation battle sites have been investigated with analysis techniques from several disciplines. Some historic battlefields are professionally managed by heritage organisations and local authorities; at others, interest groups have been set up. A remarkable percentage of these have recognised the potential and offer guided tours, trails and/or visitor centres with exhibitions. In the course of this professionalisation, it is essential to raise the quality of the management to standards established and widely accepted for other properties. A decade ago, the US National Park Service, responsible for the management of a high number of historic battlefields in the USA, called for the drafting of conservation plans in a 3 never before seen guidance document (NPS 2001). Influenced by the achievements made through structurised management planning at American battlefields, this has been picked up by British authors like Sutherland (2005, with Partida) and Foard (2008). In their publications, they recommend that management plans be drawn up for British historic battle sites. Guidelines issued in the United Kingdom (Heritage Lottery Fund 2008, Natural England 2008) agree that in heritage, proactive planning in the form of an officially approved document can help in developing a suitable management framework, however small the site. It gives the owner(s), the planners and the general public an overview over the strategies needed for the conservation and presentation of the site and details the necessary steps. Battlefields are complex sites with a varied stakeholder audience: A management plan offers consistent and continuous orientation for all involved parties. Historic Scotland (2011c, p. 9), which equally advocates the advancement of written documents, argues that management planning at battle sites can even set the parameters for “new research or information to be added, developing our knowledge base and understanding of a site over time”. While particular areas of planning have been addressed in the literature, no comprehensive model has been constructed. Therefore, a framework will be presented and tested in this paper. 4 1.4 Theoretical Review 1.4.1 Definition of the Resource Although many historic battlefields of Britain posses high value because of their natural features alone, these fields are important because of the battles which were fought on them. It is the association with a battle that turns the seemingly empty field into a heritage resource (Piekarz 2007). So in order to be able to define a battlefield, crucial to the management of these sites, the first step must be to understand which action constitutes a battle and which not. Over the course of centuries, warfare has radically changed, not least because of the introduction of firearms at the end of the Middle Ages. It is therefore difficult to propose a single, coherent definition of battle. Foard (2008, p. 4) offers a reconciliatory classification of historic battles: “A battle is here taken to be an action involving wholly or largely military forces, present on each side in numbers comprising battalion strength (i.e. totalling c. 1000 or more), and normally deployed and engaged on the field in formal battle array.” The reliance on the number of combatants to define military actions attracted criticism (see Newman 2004). Carman (1997, p. 217) suggests another approach: A military action is classified according to certain characteristics. “Organised violence [...], clear function and purpose [and] ritualised elements” indicate a battle. Other types of offense actions must insofar be excluded from the definition, in that they lack either the formal array of troops or the declared intent to fight or both. These actions encompass the skirmish, the ambush, the border conflict, the clan warfare, the civil unrest, and the massacre (MacSween 2001, Foard 2004b, Foard and Partida 2005, Sutherland 2005). The siege takes a special position among military actions. Scott and MacFeaters (2011) emphasise that as a conflict of a primarily defensive nature with built structures predating 5 the action, it has to be classified as a distinct form of warfare. A more detailed overview is given in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 below. Armed Conflict Offence Defense Siege Armed attack on a fortified built structure, often of longer duration. Fig. 1: Typology of Armed Conflict and Definition of “Siege” (MacSween 2001, Foard 2004b, Foard and Partida 2005, Sutherland 2005). 6 Battle •Armed organised conflict of larger scale, with the pre-signalled intent to fight. Skirmish •Armed conflict of smaller scale, often spontaneous and unplanned. Ambush •Armed attack on a group of armed or unarmed persons from a concealed position. Border Conflict •Armed conflict over and along a territorial border. Clan Warfare •Armed conflict of smaller scale between members and associates of hostile clans in the Scottish Highlands. Civil Unrest •Armed or unarmed uprising of a group or groups of people against the ruling authority. Massacre •Armed mass killing of (an) armed or unarmed group / groups of people. Fig. 2: Types of Offence Actions and their Definition (MacSween 2001, Foard 2004b, Foard and Partida 2005, Sutherland 2005). 7 Historic battlefields have variously been described as sites or landscapes (Carman 2005). Terminology like battlescape, battle terrain, battle site and field of conflict add to the confusion. Essentially, battlefields are both and this typology needs to be taken into consideration when managing the resource. In the simplest terms, a battlefield is “an area of land over which a battle was fought or significant activities relating to the battle occurred” (HS 2010, p. 2). The site therefore encompasses the “area of fighting”, “vantage points”, “overnight camps”, “natural [and] built elements” used in the action, “burials” and “memorials” (HS 2010, p. 3). However, the field should not be regarded as an isolated site.
Recommended publications
  • Banffshire Field Club Transactions 1915-1924
    Transactions OF THE BANFFSHIRE FIELD CLUB. THE STRATHMARTINE BanffshireTRUST Field Club The support of The Strathmartine Trust toward this publication is gratefully acknowledged. www.banffshirefieldclub.org.uk 10 least become Guthry, the aspirate of course being eliminated in German. Shortly before the War broke out a Dr von Guthry. of Posen, came to see me on his way to Edin- burgh, where he wished to make some in- vestigations into the family history. He was able to give certain assistance to Mr A. Francis Steuart in editing the "Scots in Poland" for the Scottish History Society. By cutting off their tails, as it were, a number of Jews have passed into something Scots, thus Rosenberg, Rosenbloom, Rosen- thal, and so on, have become simple "Rose." though not of the Kilravock type. No doubt it is true as ever that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, except when its stalk is: -berg, -bloom, or -baum. From time to time during the War pro- posals have been made to deal more dras- tically with changes of name than we have hitherto done, but it may be questioned whether anything will be done to stop the practice altogether. As it is, the custom must lead to a great deal of confusion for genealo- gists, and the writing of family history will become more difficult than ever. BATTLE OF GLENLIVET. A paper on the Battle of Glenlivet was contributed by Rev. R. H. Calder— The Name. Altahoolachan is the big name of a small stream between three and four miles in length near the eastern boundary of Glen- livet parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Witch-Hunting and Witch Belief in the Gidhealtachd
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Enlighten Henderson, L. (2008) Witch-hunting and witch belief in the Gàidhealtachd. In: Goodare, J. and Martin, L. and Miller, J. (eds.) Witchcraft and Belief in Early Modern Scotland. Palgrave historical studies in witchcraft and magic . Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 95-118. ISBN 9780230507883 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/7708/ Deposited on: 1 April 2011 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 CHAPTER 4 Witch-Hunting and Witch Belief in the Gàidhealtachd Lizanne Henderson In 1727, an old woman from Loth in Sutherland was brought before a blazing fire in Dornoch. The woman, traditionally known as Janet Horne, warmed herself, thinking the fire had been lit to take the chill from her bones and not, as was actually intended, to burn her to death. Or so the story goes. This case is well known as the last example of the barbarous practice of burning witches in Scotland. It is also infamous for some of its more unusual characteristics – such as the alleged witch ‘having ridden upon her own daughter’, whom she had ‘transformed into a pony’, and of course, the memorable image of the poor, deluded soul warming herself while the instruments of her death were being prepared. Impressive materials, though the most familiar parts of the story did not appear in print until at least 92 years after the event!1 Ironically, although Gaelic-speaking Scotland has been noted for the relative absence of formal witch persecutions, it has become memorable as the part of Scotland that punished witches later than anywhere else.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clan Gillean
    Ga-t, $. Mac % r /.'CTJ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from National Library of Scotland http://archive.org/details/clangilleanwithpOOsinc THE CLAN GILLEAN. From a Photograph by Maull & Fox, a Piccadilly, London. Colonel Sir PITZROY DONALD MACLEAN, Bart, CB. Chief of the Clan. v- THE CLAN GILLEAN BY THE REV. A. MACLEAN SINCLAIR (Ehartottftcton HASZARD AND MOORE 1899 PREFACE. I have to thank Colonel Sir Fitzroy Donald Maclean, Baronet, C. B., Chief of the Clan Gillean, for copies of a large number of useful documents ; Mr. H. A. C. Maclean, London, for copies of valuable papers in the Coll Charter Chest ; and Mr. C. R. Morison, Aintuim, Mr. C. A. McVean, Kilfinichen, Mr. John Johnson, Coll, Mr. James Maclean, Greenock, and others, for collecting- and sending me genea- logical facts. I have also to thank a number of ladies and gentlemen for information about the families to which they themselves belong. I am under special obligations to Professor Magnus Maclean, Glasgow, and Mr. Peter Mac- lean, Secretary of the Maclean Association, for sending me such extracts as I needed from works to which I had no access in this country. It is only fair to state that of all the help I received the most valuable was from them. I am greatly indebted to Mr. John Maclean, Convener of the Finance Committee of the Maclean Association, for labouring faithfully to obtain information for me, and especially for his efforts to get the subscriptions needed to have the book pub- lished. I feel very much obliged to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Spurlock, R.S. (2012) the Laity and the Structure of the Catholic Church in Early Modern Scotland
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Enlighten: Publications Spurlock, R.S. (2012) The laity and the structure of the Catholic Church in early modern Scotland. In: Armstrong, R. and Ó hAnnracháin, T. (eds.) Insular Christianity. Alternative models of the Church in Britain and Ireland, c.1570–c.1700. Series: Politics, culture and society in early modern Britain . Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, pp. 231-251. ISBN 9780719086984 Copyright © 2012 Manchester University Press A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge Content must not be changed in any way or reproduced in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder(s) When referring to this work, full bibliographic details must be given http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/84396/ Deposited on: 28 January 2014 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk . Insular Christianity Alternative models of the Church in Britain and Ireland, c.1570–c.1700 . Edited by ROBERT ARMSTRONG AND TADHG Ó HANNRACHÁIN Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Macmillan Armstrong_OHannrachain_InsChrist.indd 3 20/06/2012 11:19 Copyright © Manchester University Press 2012 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors, and no chapter may be reproduced wholly
    [Show full text]
  • They Came from Tiree
    They Came From Tiree by Gene Donald Lamont CHAPTER THREE THE MACLEAN YEARS Under the Lordship of the Isles The Macleans first gained a foothold in Tiree in the first half of the 14th century, when Iain Dubh Maclean of Duart, fourth chief of Clan Maclean, was named as bailie of the southern part of Tiree and as constable of Isleburgh Castle. A charter was issued in 1344 to this effect, but it was probably only confirming what Iain Dubh had held for several years. The bailery of Tiree was comprised of Mannal and Heylipol, and possibly some adjacent territory, while Isleburgh was the fortress of the Lord of the Isles in Loch an Eilean in Heylipol. These were regranted to Lachlan Lubanach by Donald, Lord of the Isles, in 1390. In the beginning such property was only held at the will of the Lord of the Isles, but over time became a heriditary grant. The Macleans of Duart held Isleburgh Castle and the orignal land of the bailery of Tiree until they were lost to the Campbells in the latter part of the 17th century, except for a brief period, of say 1492-1509. During those years Maclean of Lochbuie, who also held property on the island, took advantage of the fact that Maclean of Duart was out of favor with the government and managed to be appointed the bailie of the southern part of Tiree. For a while both held the same office, which exacerbated the rivalry between these two branches of the clan, but the pendulum swung back to the Duart group’s favor very shortly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highland Clans of Scotland
    :00 CD CO THE HIGHLAND CLANS OF SCOTLAND ARMORIAL BEARINGS OF THE CHIEFS The Highland CLANS of Scotland: Their History and "Traditions. By George yre-Todd With an Introduction by A. M. MACKINTOSH WITH ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-TWO ILLUSTRATIONS, INCLUDING REPRODUCTIONS Of WIAN'S CELEBRATED PAINTINGS OF THE COSTUMES OF THE CLANS VOLUME TWO A D. APPLETON AND COMPANY NEW YORK MCMXXIII Oft o PKINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN CONTENTS PAGE THE MACDONALDS OF KEPPOCH 26l THE MACDONALDS OF GLENGARRY 268 CLAN MACDOUGAL 278 CLAN MACDUFP . 284 CLAN MACGILLIVRAY . 290 CLAN MACINNES . 297 CLAN MACINTYRB . 299 CLAN MACIVER . 302 CLAN MACKAY . t 306 CLAN MACKENZIE . 314 CLAN MACKINNON 328 CLAN MACKINTOSH 334 CLAN MACLACHLAN 347 CLAN MACLAURIN 353 CLAN MACLEAN . 359 CLAN MACLENNAN 365 CLAN MACLEOD . 368 CLAN MACMILLAN 378 CLAN MACNAB . * 382 CLAN MACNAUGHTON . 389 CLAN MACNICOL 394 CLAN MACNIEL . 398 CLAN MACPHEE OR DUFFIE 403 CLAN MACPHERSON 406 CLAN MACQUARIE 415 CLAN MACRAE 420 vi CONTENTS PAGE CLAN MATHESON ....... 427 CLAN MENZIES ........ 432 CLAN MUNRO . 438 CLAN MURRAY ........ 445 CLAN OGILVY ........ 454 CLAN ROSE . 460 CLAN ROSS ........ 467 CLAN SHAW . -473 CLAN SINCLAIR ........ 479 CLAN SKENE ........ 488 CLAN STEWART ........ 492 CLAN SUTHERLAND ....... 499 CLAN URQUHART . .508 INDEX ......... 513 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Armorial Bearings .... Frontispiece MacDonald of Keppoch . Facing page viii Cairn on Culloden Moor 264 MacDonell of Glengarry 268 The Well of the Heads 272 Invergarry Castle .... 274 MacDougall ..... 278 Duustaffnage Castle . 280 The Mouth of Loch Etive . 282 MacDuff ..... 284 MacGillivray ..... 290 Well of the Dead, Culloden Moor . 294 Maclnnes ..... 296 Maclntyre . 298 Old Clansmen's Houses 300 Maclver ....
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Reformation Catholic Houses of North-East Scotland Lan B D Bryce* & Alasdair Robertsf
    Proc SocAntiq Scot, (1993)3 12 , 363-72 Post-Reformation Catholic houses of north-east Scotland lan B D Bryce* & Alasdair Robertsf ABSTRACT Roman Catholic imagery associated with secular buildings (as distinct from churches) in north-east Scotland Arme took formth e f th ao Christ armsr IHSe !o Jesusr f Christo th o d an monogram. The former symbol first became popular in the late medieval period and the latter used Jesuitswas by symbola as Counter-Reformation. of Architectural socialand historyare combined here, formerthe demonstrating that those images that have survived belongthe to post-Reformation period. INTRODUCTION This pape concernes i r d with Roman Catholic symbol post-Reformatioe th f so n period which were placed on the walls of castles and houses. Catholicism was a regional affair in the early modern period, stronger away from Edinburgh and the central Lowlands and strongest in the north-east. The Catholic heartland was at first in Buchan and Strathbogie, with Deeside and e Enzith e (clos o Speymoutht e ) becoming more importan e 17tth hn i centuryt . Party allegianc oftes wa en expresse religioun di s terms t seemeI . d natura castle-buildere th o t l d san restorers of the time to include symbols of belief either inside the building or, more assertively, on its outer walls. Although we are not concerned here with imagery in churches it is worth mentioning that religious emblems also decorated family vaults. Indee e themdth f thio e se papeth n o r imagery in Catholic houses can be introduced through Catholic tombs.
    [Show full text]
  • King James VI of Scotland's Foreign Relations with Europe (C.1584-1603)
    DIPLOMACY & DECEPTION: KING JAMES VI OF SCOTLAND'S FOREIGN RELATIONS WITH EUROPE (C. 1584-1603) Cynthia Ann Fry A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2014 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/5902 This item is protected by original copyright DIPLOMACY & DECEPTION: King James VI of Scotland’s Foreign Relations with Europe (c. 1584-1603) Cynthia Ann Fry This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews October 2014 ABSTRACT This thesis is the first attempt to provide an assessment of Scottish-Jacobean foreign relations within a European context in the years before 1603. Moreover, it represents the only cohesive study of the events that formed the foundation of the diplomatic policies and practices of the first ruler of the Three Kingdoms. Whilst extensive research has been conducted on the British and English aspects of James VI & I’s diplomatic activities, very little work has been done on James’s foreign policies prior to his accession to the English throne. James VI ruled Scotland for almost twenty years before he took on the additional role of King of England and Ireland. It was in his homeland that James developed and refined his diplomatic skills, and built the relationships with foreign powers that would continue throughout his life. James’s pre-1603 relationships with Denmark-Norway, France, Spain, the Papacy, the German and Italian states, the Spanish Netherlands and the United Provinces all influenced his later ‘British’ policies, and it is only through a study such as this that their effects can be fully understood.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names, Highlands & Islands of Scotland
    4 r D PLACE NAMES HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS OF SCOTLAND y-V~7'*'t^ z^--*^ Q HIGHLANDS & ISLANDS OF SCOTLAND ALEX. MacBAIN, M.A.,LL.D. WITH NOTE.S AND A FOREWORD BY WILLIAM J. WATSON, MA.,LL.D. - \^' ^'--fSSSSS^.-sll^^ ENEAS MACKAY 43 MURRAY PLACE, STIRLING 1922 INTROiJUCTION. Dr Alexander Macbain's work on Names of Places deals with the Cehic names of pre-Gaehc " " he calls Pictish with Gaehc origin which ; names, ancl with names of Norse origin which have been transmitted through Gaelic. The area from which he took his materials was chiefly Inverness-shire, Sutherland, and Lewis. His views on the language spoken by the Picts are " given in his paper on Ptolemy's Geography of Scotland" (published separately), in his edition of Skene's "Highlanders of Scotland," and in several papers contained in this volume, particu- " larly that on the Place-Names of Inverness- shire." His position is that the Picts spoke that the Celtic Early British or a dialect of it, and language of early Britain was practically homo- geneous from the English Channel to the very North. He agrees with Kuno Meyer in holding " that no Gael ever set his foot on British soil save from a vessel that had put out from Ire- larid." Further, assuming that the terms Cruthen (which is the Gaelic form of Briton) and Pict are co-extensive and mutually convertible, VI. INTKODUCTION. ' ' ' he includes under Picts ' the whole of the Celtic settlers in Britain prior to the Belgae, thus ignoring the facts that the Picts are not heard of till about 300 %^, and that all old authorities (Gildas, Nennius, Bede, &c.) state that their original seat in Scotland was in the far North.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Fearn
    SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY FIFTH SERIES VOLUME 4 The Calendar of Fearn ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Council of the Society is pleased to record that the publication of the Calendar of Team, with its importance for the history of Easter Ross, has been aided by generous sponsorship from the Glenmorangie Distillery Coy., an internationally renowned malt whisky distillers based in the area. The publication of Robin Adam’s edition of the Calendar of Fearn represents the culmination of a project which has been of very great interest to the Glenmorangie Distillery Company. With our roots in Tain, only a few miles from the remains of Fearn Abbey, we would naturally welcome any research which increases knowledge of our home district in Ross-shire, but this present project has touched us even more closely. Next year is the 150th anniversary of the official licensing of our distillery outside Tain at Glenmorangie, and it has been especially gratifying to find at this particular time that we have a personal link to the men who compiled the greater part of the original Calendar itself, Thomas Ross, the last abbot of Fearn, and his eldest son, Walter, who converted the former church lands of Morangie into part of their family estate. It is interesting to note that in the ‘Tain and Balnagown Documents’ reference is made to the ‘aqua vitae pot still and ffleak (worm)’ which were numbered amongst Thomas’s possessions at the time of his death in 1703. It was as laird of Morangie that Walter Ross was to make additions to his father’s writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerr-Peterson, Miles (2016) Politics and Protestant
    Kerr-Peterson, Miles (2016) Politics and protestant Lordship in North East Scotland during the reign of James VI: The life of George Keith, fourth Earl Marischal, 1554-1623. PhD thesis. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/7480/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Politics and Protestant Lordship in North East Scotland during the Reign of James VI: The Life of George Keith, fourth Earl Marischal, 1554-1623 Miles Kerr-Peterson, MLitt, MA (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow Abstract George Keith, fourth Earl Marischal is a case study of long-term, quietly successful and stable lordship through the reign of James VI. Marischal’s life provides a wholly underrepresented perspective on this era, where the study of rebellious and notorious characters has dominated. He is also a counter-example to the notion of a general crisis among the European nobility, at least in the Scottish context, as well as to the notion of a ‘conservative’ or ‘Catholic’ north east.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies the Patrick Gordon Diary and Its
    Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Volume 3: Issue 2 The Patrick Gordon Diary And Its Context AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies, University of Aberdeen JOURNAL OF IRISH AND SCOTTISH STUDIES Volume 3, Issue 2 Spring 2010 The Patrick Gordon Diary And Its Context Published by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen in association with The universities of the The Irish-Scottish Academic Initiative ISSN 1753-2396 Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies General Editor: Cairns Craig Issue Editor: Paul Dukes Associate Editor: Michael Brown Editorial Advisory Board: Fran Brearton, Queen’s University, Belfast Eleanor Bell, University of Strathclyde Ewen Cameron, University of Edinburgh Sean Connolly, Queen’s University, Belfast Patrick Crotty, University of Aberdeen David Dickson, Trinity College, Dublin T. M. Devine, University of Edinburgh David Dumville, University of Aberdeen Aaron Kelly, University of Edinburgh Edna Longley, Queen’s University, Belfast Peter Mackay, Queen’s University, Belfast Shane Alcobia-Murphy, University of Aberdeen Ian Campbell Ross, Trinity College, Dublin Graham Walker, Queen’s University, Belfast International Advisory Board: Don Akenson, Queen’s University, Kingston Tom Brooking, University of Otago Keith Dixon, Université Lumière Lyon 2 Luke Gibbons, Notre Dame Marjorie Howes, Boston College H. Gustav Klaus, University of Rostock Peter Kuch, University of Otago Graeme Morton, University of Guelph Brad Patterson, Victoria University, Wellington Matthew Wickman, Brigham Young David Wilson, University of Toronto The Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies is a peer reviewed journal published twice yearly in autumn and spring by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]