1 - Scottishleftreview Issue 100 July/August 2017 2 - Scottishleftreview Issue 100 July/August 2017 Feedback

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 - Scottishleftreview Issue 100 July/August 2017 2 - Scottishleftreview Issue 100 July/August 2017 Feedback 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 100 July/August 2017 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 100 July/August 2017 feedback comment Where we are now ay didn’t quite end in June situation has afflicted the SNP – still an election campaign, under which but her mantra of providing the biggest party by seats and votes reporting had to be more balanced, M‘strong and stable’ in Scotland but looking and feeling a Labour’s pledge to govern for the leadership turned into the actuality lot like Labour after its involvement reviewsmany and not the few resonated of being ‘weak and wobbly’ while in the ‘Better Together’ campaign – widely. Jeremy Corbyn was more at Corbyn went from being (allegedly) somewhat dejected and on the back home and a much better performer unelectable and an electoral liability foot. at the countless mass street rallies into something akin to a conquering than in the Westminster chamber. hero – certainly if his reception at Serious left analysis must start And, Labour was able to create its UNISON annual conference and by asking two fundamental own direct link to voters, especially Glastonbury were anything to go by. questions, namely, why did Labour younger ones, via social media Just as with after the independence do much better than any of the without being reliant upon the referendum in September 2014, it polls (including its own) indicated mainstream media. Its organisation seemed that the vanquished were it would, and why did Labour not of activists especially via a dedicated actually the victors. But there are actually win? The exposure of app used by Momentum in also other historical parallels to Theresa May as weak and wobbly particular was also notable. But be cited for the Tories did as much as well as cold, austere and without Labour still received just under to lose their slim parliamentary any common touch certainly helped 800,000 votes less than the Tories, majority as Labour did to bring but so too did Labour’s programme. with the Tories gaining 5.5% more about this situation. The same Under the heightened exposure of votes than in 2015, and it is doubtful Cover: ScottishLeftReview Nadia Lucchesi Issue 100 July/August 2017 ([email protected]) Contents Proofing services: Bob Thomson and John Daly Extended editorial: where we are now ............................................................................3 The electorate: surprisingly strong, unsurprisingly unstable Malcolm Harvey ................6 Communications and Warning shot given and received Chris Stephens ........................................................ 10 organisational development: Getting back on the socialist saddle Lesley Brennan ..................................................... 11 Carole Ewart Many new flowers are beginning to bloom Clare Haughey .......................................... 12 Editor Email: The Corbyn connection Lynn Henderson ...................................................................... 13 [email protected] Could the left have done more and, thus, better? Helen Mcfarlane ............................. 14 Web: www.scottishleftreview.org SNP climbdown over indyref2 presages new realignment Colin Fox ............................ 15 Tel: 0141 424 0042 Independence is still the game changer Carolyn Leckie ............................................... 16 Our movement, our future Maggie Chapman .............................................................. 17 Address: Take note - this is what we are about! .......................................................................... 20 Scottish Left Review, 100 editions down – here’s to the next 100! ................................................................. 21 741 Shields Road, Pollokshields, Constituting Scotland Tom Nairn ................................................................................... 22 Glasgow G41 4PL Eyewitness report from Quito, Ecuador Jennifer Bonnar and Chris Ruddy .................. 26 Jean-Luc Mélenchon – the French Jeremy Corbyn Daniel Brillet ................................. 27 Printed by Book review – Sean Sheehan ........................................................................................ 28 Hampden Advertising Ltd, Film review – Jackie Bergson ......................................................................................... 29 403 Hillington Road, G52 4BL, Kick up the Tabloids – Vladimir McTavish ..................................................................... 30 Tel: 0141 429 1010 3 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 100 July/August 2017 that Labour would have won had the for themselves through collective and Wishaw, the Tories would have election campaign run for another struggle in their workplaces and had difficulty forming any kind of two weeks as John McDonnell communities. The message should government. Compared south of the claimed. In other words, ‘Jez he did’ be ‘Rise up!’ border, neither the Corbyn effect but by not quite enough. (10% vote increase in England) Like many others on the left, the or a popular Labour devolved The ecstasy and exhilaration of Morning Star has become an administration (12% vote increase moment of advance for Labour will uncritical cheer leader for Corbyn. in Wales) existed in Scotland. The surely dissipate – not so much as the This is not helpful and it serves legacy of ‘Better Together’ and a Tories are still in government but no positive purpose for the left to politically and personally woeful because Labour is not and it is not suspend its critical faculty when it leadership in the form of Kezia clear how, when and where it can comes to Corbyn. Yes, he should be Dugdale are the critical explanatory act to bring the Tory government defended from attacks from the right variables. So it is all very well saying, down. This means Labour is likely but his support should be not be as left Labour MSPs Alex Rowley to something of a bystander, unconditional and without criticism. and Neil Findlay and others have waiting for the Tory-DUP coalition One of Corbyn’s weak points is the said, that Labour would have done to tear itself apart. Meantime absence of the use of the vocabulary better in Scotland with more radical and no matter saying that it will of class. In an age where working approach, namely, empathising remain on a war footing as well class consciousness is at such low Labour’s manifesto, and one less as boosted by tens of thousands ebb, ‘for the many, not the few’ based on opposing indyref2. Logic of new members recruited during could too easily be interpreted as then dictates that Labour can’t win and after the election, Labour the 99% against the 1% following in Scotland with Dugdale so the left could easily return to the narrow the Occupy movement. The ruling needs to move to remove her and confines of the parliamentary class and its functionaries are much do so soon. Not doing so is to ignore arena. Here, and despite the fillip bigger than 1% and the working the elephant in the room. to his personal confidence and class does not comprise 99% of the stature with weakened Tories and population. In similar terms, Corbyn We asked eight of the leading a becalmed Parliamentary Labour must explain his socialist vision voices on the left in Scotland to Party, Corbyn is on weaker ground as because, while to be welcomed, give their thoughts on ‘where he was before in the last parliament. what he sets out is merely social now for the left?’ The plurality Indeed, the last Scottish Left Review democracy albeit a progressive of perspective is evident over editorial argued that Corbyn needed version. Brexit and independence. What is to be ten times better than May common though is that the SNP The left in the Labour Party, – it turned out that he easily was over-estimated, as this editorial especially Momentum in England but that was during an election has argued before, its impact of, and Wales and Campaign for campaign when normal rules did not and importance to, the cause of Socialism in Scotland, must seize apply. independence. Since the SNP’s the initiative with the increase in parliamentary retreat on 8 June, Since he was elected leader, popular support and membership many have pointed out that the Corbyn has endured vilification and take control of the Party SNP is not synonymous with from the right and soft left of the constitution, structure and independence movement. That Parliamentary Labour Party. Some of organisation in order to hand power has always been the case but it these figures have indicated they are back to ordinary members and cannot hide the essential truth now willing to serve in his Shadow isolate the right wing careerists who that the SNP is the major – and Cabinet, but he should be very have ruined it. This should start controlling- part of that movement careful in his choices. He may find it with a radical agenda for change at and so what happens to the SNP prudent for the sake of party unity this year’s National Conference in does have a significant impact on to invite some to join the cabinet, September. the prospects for independence. but their numbers should be limited. For Labour, Scotland continues to Its defence of access to the Single Yet only if Corbyn looks to act where provide a particular and continuing European Market and the freedom he is strongest, namely, outside conundrum. If Labour had done of movement for labour have parliament, can he seek to replicate much better than its extra six not gained the degree of traction the strength and support he had seats and 2.8% vote increase – with voters as the SNP thought – during
Recommended publications
  • 2015-2016) (2.2MB Pdf
    Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 5: 5th Parliamentary Year, Session 4 (11 May 2015 – 23 March 2016) SPJ 4.5 Foreword The Journal is the central, long-term, authoritative record of what the Parliament has done. The Minutes of Proceedings, which are produced for each meeting of the Parliament, do that in an immediate way, while the Journal presents essentially the same material but has the benefit of hindsight to allow any errors and infelicities of presentation to be corrected. Unlike the Official Report, which primarily records what is said, the Minutes of Proceedings, and in the longer term the Journal, provide the authoritative record of what was done. The Journal is required under Rule 16.3 of Standing Orders and contains, in addition to the Minutes of Proceedings themselves, notice of any Bill introduced*, notice of any instrument or draft instrument or any other document laid before the Parliament; notice of any report of a committee, and any other matter that the Parliament, on a motion of the Parliamentary Bureau, considers should be included. (* The requirement to include notice of Bills introduced was only added to Rule 16.3 in January 2003. However, such notices have in practice been recorded in the Annex to the Minutes of Proceedings from the outset.) Note: (DT), which appears throughout the Journal, signifies a decision taken at Decision Time. Chamber Office Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 5: 5th Parliamentary Year, Session 4 (11 May 2015 – 23 March 2016) CONTENTS Page Journal ……………………………………………………………………………….1 Annex A Bills Introduced …………………………………………………………………. 321 Annex B Subordinate Legislation— 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Msps by NHS Board 12 January 2016 Msps: Current Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet MSPs by NHS Board 12 January 2016 MSPs: Current Series This fact sheet provides a list of MSPs who represent constituencies or regions within the boundaries of each of the NHS Boards in Scotland. The health boards are listed in alphabetical order, followed by the name of the MSPs, their party and the constituency or region they represent. The boundaries of health boards and parliamentary constituencies do not coincide, so some constituencies overlap into two or more health boards. Where this happens the MSP representing the constituency will be listed under all relevant health boards. Similarly, where the boundary of a Scottish Parliament region overlaps into two or more health boards all of the MSPs elected to represent that region will be listed under all relevant health boards. Abbreviation Party Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Ind Independent Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats NPA No Party Affiliation SNP Scottish National Party Ayrshire and Arran MSP Party Constituency (C) or Region (R) John Scott Con Ayr (C) Adam Ingram SNP Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley (C) Kenneth Gibson SNP Cunninghame North (C) Margaret Burgess SNP Cunninghame South (C) Willie Coffey SNP Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley (C) Claudia Beamish Lab South Scotland (R) Chic Brodie SNP South Scotland (R) Jim Hume LD South Scotland (R) Joan McAlpine SNP South Scotland (R) Aileen McLeod SNP South Scotland (R) Graeme
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Msps by Party Session 4 29 March 2016 Msps: Historical Series
    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament I nfor mation C entre l ogo Scottish Parliament Fact sheet MSPs by Party Session 4 29 March 2016 MSPs: Historical Series This Fact sheet provides a cumulative list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during session 4, arranged by party. It also includes the Independent MSPs. The MSPs are listed in alphabetical order, by the party that they were elected to represent, with the party with most MSPs listed first. Statistical information about the number of MSPs in each party in Session 4 can be found on the State of the Parties Session 4 fact sheet. Scottish National Party MSP Constituency (C) or Region (R) Brian Adam 1 Aberdeen Donside (C) George Adam Paisley (C) Clare Adamson Central Scotland (R) Alasdair Allan Na h-Eileanan an lar (C) Christian Allard2 North East Scotland (R) Colin Beattie Midlothian North and Musselburgh (C) Marco Biagi Edinburgh Central (C) Chic Brodie South of Scotland (R) Keith Brown Clackmannanshire & Dunblane (C) Margaret Burgess Cunninghame South (C) Aileen Campbell Clydesdale (C) Roderick Campbell North East Fife (C) Willie Coffey Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley (C) Angela Constance Almond Valley (C) Bruce Crawford Stirling (C) Roseanna Cunningham Perthshire South and Kinross-shire (C) Graeme Dey Angus South (C) Nigel Don Angus North and Mearns (C) Bob Doris Glasgow (R) James Dornan Glasgow Cathcart (C) Jim Eadie Edinburgh Southern (C) Annabelle Ewing Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Fergus Ewing Inverness and Nairn (C) Linda Fabiani East Kilbride (C) Joe FitzPatrick Dundee City West (C) Kenneth Gibson Cunninghame North (C) Rob Gibson Caithness, Sutherland and Ross (C) Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Christine Grahame Lauderdale (C) 1 Brian Adam died on 25 April 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Official Report Parliamentary Debates
    Monday Volume 652 7 January 2019 No. 228 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 7 January 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE—The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt. Hon Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. Stephen Barclay, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Gavin Williamson, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Matt Hancock, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WORK AND PENSIONS—The Rt Hon. Amber Rudd, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The IR35 MP Hit List ­ the 100 Politicians Most Likely to Lose Their Seats
    The UK's leading contractor site. 200,000 monthly unique visitors. GUIDES IR35 CALCULATORS BUSINESS INSURANCE BANKING ACCOUNTANTS INSURANCE MORTGAGES PENSIONS RESOURCES FREE IR35 TEST The IR35 MP hit list ­ The 100 politicians most likely to lose their seats Last December research conducted by ContractorCalculator identified the MPs for whom it will prove most costly to lose the self­employed vote, and published the top 20 from each party. The results were based on data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and contractor sentiment indicated by a previous ContractorCalculator survey. The full results of this research are now published, with the top 100 MPs, ordered by risk of losing their seat, due to the Off­payroll (IR35) reforms that Treasury, HMRC and the Chancellor are attempting to push through Parliament. In total, 85 MPs hold a majority in Parliament that would feasibly be overturned if the expected turnout of IR35­opposing self­employed voters from their constituency were to vote against them, and we list the next 15, making 100 in total, that are potentially under threat if the self­ employed voter turnout is higher than expected. "This single piece of damaging policy could prove catastrophic for all parties involved, not least the Tories, who make up 43% of the at­risk seats,” comments ContractorCalculator CEO, Dave Chaplin. “There is also potentially a lot to gain for some, but those in precarious positions will have to act swiftly and earnestly to win over contractors’ trust.” How we identified the at­risk MPs The research leveraged the data and compared the MPs majority at the last election with the likely number of self­employed voters in their area who would turn out and vote against them.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Elections: 1 May 2003 14.05.03
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/46 Scottish Parliament 14 MAY 2003 Elections: 1 May 2003 This paper provides summary and detailed results of the second elections to the Scottish Parliament which took place on 1 May 2003. The paper provides data on voting trends and electoral turnout for constituencies, electoral regions and for Scotland as a whole. This paper is a companion volume to Library Research Papers 03/45 Welsh Assembly Elections and 03/44 Local Elections 2003. Matthew Leeke & Richard Cracknell SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers 03/32 Parliamentary Questions, Debate Contributions and Participation in 31.03.03 Commons Divisions 03/33 Economic Indicators [includes article: Changes to National Insurance 01.04.03 Contributions, April 2003] 03/34 The Anti-Social Behaviour Bill [Bill 83 of 2002-03] 04.04.03 03/35 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2003-04-11 10.04.03 03/36 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2003 17.04.03 03/37 Economic Indicators [includes article: The current WTO trade round] 01.05.03 03/38 NHS Foundation Trusts in the Health and Social Care 01.05.03 (Community Health and Standards) Bill [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/39 Social Care Aspects of the Health and Social Care (Community Health 02.05.03 and Standards Bill) [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/40 Social Indicators 06.05.03 03/41 The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) 06.05.03 Bill: Health aspects other than NHS Foundation Trusts [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/42 The Fire Services Bill [Bill 81 of 2002-03] 07.05.03 03/43
    [Show full text]
  • Bordering Two Unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics de Mars, Sylvia; Murray, Colin; O'Donoghue, Aiofe; Warwick, Ben Book — Published Version Bordering two unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit Policy Press Shorts: Policy & Practice Provided in Cooperation with: Bristol University Press Suggested Citation: de Mars, Sylvia; Murray, Colin; O'Donoghue, Aiofe; Warwick, Ben (2018) : Bordering two unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit, Policy Press Shorts: Policy & Practice, ISBN 978-1-4473-4622-7, Policy Press, Bristol, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv56fh0b This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190846 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • The Passage of the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill
    Concepts of Representation and The Passage of The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill Dr Sarah Childs First Draft for Journal of Legislative Studies Middlesex University White Hart Lane London N17 8HR 07950-933371 [email protected] Abstract The Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Bill was introduced to the Commons in October 2001, gaining Royal Assent in February 2002. The Bill followed the decrease in the numbers of women elected in the 2001 General Election. It permits political parties to introduce positive action in the selection of candidates. The Bill received cross party support and had an easy passage through both Houses of Parliament. This article examines the arguments employed by MPs and Peers in support of the legislation, informed by feminist concepts of representation. Arguments associated with the claim that women have a different political style received little support. There was greater discussion of arguments based on symbolic representation and substantive representation, although many MPs were reluctant to make the strong claim that women’s substantive representation is dependent upon women’s presence. However, the most widely supported argument in favour of the Bill was the justice argument, namely, that women are currently being denied equal opportunities in the parties’ selection processes. Introduction1 The 2001 General Election saw 118 (17.9%) women MPs returned to the House of Commons. This was the first time in over twenty years that the numbers of women MPs had decreased (Lovenduski 2001). Yet it was not unexpected. Unlike 1997 when the Labour Party had implemented all women shortlists (AWS), no political party adopted positive discrimination measures for 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.12 MB
    Published: Tuesday 6 October 2020 Early Day Motions tabled on Monday 5 October 2020 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 957 Black History Month and the British Hotel and the Scots Jamaican Nurse Mary Seacole Tabled: 5/10/20 Signatories: 1 Anne McLaughlin That this House notes October is Black History Month; welcomes the opportunity to highlight some of those people largely forgotten in history but who have made a significant contribution nonetheless; celebrates the tale of Scots Jamaican nurse Mary Seacole who set up her own convalescent home named The British Hotel, to tend wounded soldiers with traditional herbal remedies in the Crimean war of the 1850s; considers it all the more impressive that she did so after being rejected by the War Office and by fundraising for the costs herself; understands she was so well loved for the voluntary work she carried out that when she returned to London in 1857, destitute, and a fundraising gala in her honour on the banks of the River Thames attracted 80,000 guests; understands that Mary Seacole then disappeared from history books for over a century; finds it inexplicable that when her contribution began to be acknowledged in more recent times, there were campaigns against doing so; and considers it fitting that she is now considered one of the greatest black role models and has been remembered with a community hospital named after her in Surrey and a statue erected in her honour outside St Thomas’ Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • View Early Day Motions PDF File 0.08 MB
    Published: Friday 23 July 2021 Early Day Motions tabled on Thursday 22 July 2021 Early Day Motions (EDMs) are motions for which no days have been fixed. The number of signatories includes all members who have added their names in support of the Early Day Motion (EDM), including the Member in charge of the Motion. EDMs and added names are also published on the EDM database at www.parliament.uk/edm [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. New EDMs 362 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report on women's state pension age Tabled: 22/07/21 Signatories: 1 Liz Saville Roberts That this House welcomes the publication of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report titled Women’s State Pension age: our findings on the Department for Work and Pensions' communication of changes; is concerned by the report’s findings of maladministration and failure by DWP to appropriately inform women of changes to their State Pension Allowance; and calls upon the UK Government to fully engage with the Ombudsman's findings and meet with campaigners to come to an equitable solution to address the injustice of state pension inequality, a problem which affects 3.7 million women in the UK, including 194,000 in Wales. 363 Rise in antisemitic hate crime Tabled: 22/07/21 Signatories: 1 Layla Moran That this House condemns the appalling rise in antisemitism in the weeks during and after the devastating escalation of violence in Israel and Palestine; notes with concern that the Community Security Trust (CST) recorded 628 antisemitic
    [Show full text]