DOCSLIB.ORG

Contaminated Land Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Water and Environment Management Framework Lot 3 – Engineering and Related Services West Wight Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy Appendix B - Contaminated Land Review March 2016 Document overview Capita | AECOM was commissioned by the Isle of Wight Council in October 2014 to undertake a Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy. As part of this commission, a contaminated land review is required in order to determine the potential contamination issues that need to be considered as part of the strategy. Document history Version Status Issue date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by Jason Drummond – Principal Flood and Coastal Tara-Leigh Helen Culshaw – Draft for Specialist McVey 1 6th February 2015 Senior comment Hydrogeologist George Batt – Associate Graduate Coastal Engineer Jason Drummond George Batt – Tara-Leigh Revision – 27th February Graduate McVey 2 after client Principal Flood 2015 Coastal comments and Coastal Engineer Associate Specialist Jason Drummond Revision George Batt – – Tara-Leigh after further Graduate Principal Flood McVey 3 4th August 2015 client Coastal and Coastal comments Engineer Specialist Associate Revision Ben Taylor – Tara-Leigh Jonathan Short – after further 18th December Graduate McVey 4 Senior Coastal client 2015 Coastal Specialist comments Engineer Associate Tara-Leigh Ben Taylor Jonathan Short – Update for McVey 5 March 2016 Assistant Principal consultation Consultant Consultant Associate Scott House, Alencon Link, i Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP. Limitations Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd (“Capita”) / Capita | AECOM URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Isle of Wight Council in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by Capita | AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of Capita | AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by Capita | AECOM has not been independently verified by Capita | AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by Capita | AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken between December 2014 and January 2015 and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identified in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. Capita | AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter affecting the Report, which may come or be brought to Capita’s | AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report. Certain statements made in the Report that are not historical facts may constitute estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements and even though they are based on reasonable assumptions as of the date of the Report, such forward-looking statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results predicted. Capita | AECOM specifically does not guarantee or warrant any estimate or projections contained in this Report. ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Project Background 1 1.2 Purpose of the Document 1 2. Contaminated Land 2 2.1 Definition 2 2.2 Assessing Risk 3 3. Methodology 4 3.1 Data Collection and Review 4 3.2 Scoping Relevant Sites 4 3.3 Establishing Potential Receptors and Pathways 4 3.4 Risk Assessment of Relevant Sites 4 4. Data Review 6 4.1 Source Data 6 4.2 Receptor Data 6 4.3 Pathway Data 6 5. Potential Contamination Receptors 7 5.1 Human Beings and Property 7 5.2 Ecological Systems 7 5.3 Controlled Waters 8 6. Potential Contamination Pathways 10 6.1 General Pathways 10 6.2 Strategy Impacts on Source-Receptor Linkages 11 7. Risk Assessment of Contamination Sites 12 7.1 Context 12 7.2 Sites 12 8. Conclusions 27 8.1 Summary 27 8.2 Recommendations for Strategy Development and Implementation 27 9. References 28 Figures Figure 2-1: Risk Model (adapted from CIRIA C718) 3 Tables Table 5-1: Environmentally Designated Sites within the Strategy 7 iii 1. Introduction 1.1 Project Background Capita | AECOM has been appointed by the Isle of Wight Council (IWC) to develop a coastal flood and erosion risk management strategy for West Wight, between Freshwater Bay westward along the coast to East Cowes. The strategy will evaluate options for managing coastal flooding and erosion, including potential maintenance and capital works required. The strategy option assessments will be based on technical issues, economics, stakeholder interests, and environmental impacts. Following a thorough evaluation of these different aspects, the strategy will develop sustainable and adaptable coastal defence options with preferred implementation plans put forward. These options will reference the preferred policies outlined in the Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2 (SMP2) published in 2010. The SMP2 was adopted by the Isle of Wight Council and the Regional Flood Defence Committee in December 2010; formal Environment Agency approval followed in May 2011. 1.2 Purpose of the Document This document details the findings of a land contamination data desktop study undertaken by Capita | AECOM for the West Wight strategy area; the available data has been reviewed to identify contaminated land that will need to be considered in the West Wight Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy, herein referred to as “the Strategy”. Contaminated land needs to be addressed in the Strategy because there is potential for the strategy management decisions to have either a positive or negative influence on issues regarding contamination. For example, the implementation of new defences along a currently eroding contaminated shoreline can remove a pollution hazard by blocking the pathway that in the future would link a source (e.g. a landfill site) to a receptor (e.g. an environmentally sensitive habitat). Conversely, following a policy of ‘No Active Intervention’ may allow a contamination issue caused by flooding or erosion to continue or to be introduced. These issues must therefore be recognised and risks assessed to develop potential options. No intrusive surveys or material testing has been carried out as part of the assessment. The desktop study has been based on a review of available data and information provided by IWC and/or held in the public domain. The indicative risk levels attributed to sites are provided purely in relation to the Strategy for the purpose of highlighting key issues for option development, and should not be used in any other context. It should also be noted that although certain sites along the frontage have been identified as being potentially contaminated, no sites have been formally designated as ‘Contaminated Land’ at present. Further detailed studies and intrusive surveys would be required to confirm if these potentially contaminated sites would meet the statutory definition of contaminated land. Due to the indicative and strategic level nature of the desktop findings, and due to potential sensitivities or misinterpretation of sensitive information, no mapping of sites has been undertaken; rather potential sites have been signposted in each Policy Unit (Section 7) and this information has been considered in the appraisal of Strategy options. 1 2. Contaminated Land 2.1 Definition Contaminated land is defined in section 78A(2) of Part 2A of Environmental Protection Act 1990. With the issue of the new Statutory Guidance (2012) the definition has been modified to include the significant pollution of controlled waters: “Any land which appears to the local authority in whose area it is situated to be in such a condition, by reason of substances in, on or under the land, that: Significant harm is being caused or there is a significant possibility of such harm being caused; or Significant pollution of controlled waters is being caused, or there is a significant possibility of such pollution being caused.” Contamination of land arises primarily from industrial processes, accidents or spills of contaminants, waste disposal and leaking underground storage tanks. If not dealt with adequately it can pose a threat to human health, the environment and sustainable economic development. In this context, the Government’s objectives with respect to contaminated land are: To identify and remove unacceptable risks to human health and the environment; To seek to ensure that contaminated land is made suitable for its current use; To ensure that the burdens faced by individuals, companies and society as a whole are proportionate, manageable and compatible with the principles of sustainable development. The risks presented by any given level of contamination will vary greatly according to the use of the land and a wide range of other factors, such as the underlying geology of the site. In recognition of this, the Government considers a ‘suitable for use’ approach in dealing with contaminated land to be the most appropriate. This consists of four elements and is the basis of the current UK legislation dealing with contaminated land: Ensuring that the land is suitable for its current use; Ensuring that land is made suitable for any new use, as official permission is given for that new use; Limiting requirements for remediation work in relation to the current use; Future use of the land.
Recommended publications
  • Historic Environment Action Plan West Wight Chalk Downland

    Historic Environment Action Plan West Wight Chalk Downland

    Directorate of Community Services Director Sarah Mitchell Historic Environment Action Plan West Wight Chalk Downland Isle of Wight County Archaeology and Historic Environment Service October 2008 01983 823810 archaeology @iow.gov.uk Iwight.com HEAP for West Wight Chalk Downland. INTRODUCTION The West Wight Chalk Downland HEAP Area has been defined on the basis of geology, topography and historic landscape character. It forms the western half of a central chalk ridge that crosses the Isle of Wight, the eastern half having been defined as the East Wight Chalk Ridge . Another block of Chalk and Upper Greensand in the south of the Isle of Wight has been defined as the South Wight Downland . Obviously there are many similarities between these three HEAP Areas. However, each of the Areas occupies a particular geographical location and has a distinctive historic landscape character. This document identifies essential characteristics of the West Wight Chalk Downland . These include the large extent of unimproved chalk grassland, great time-depth, many archaeological features and historic settlement in the Bowcombe Valley. The Area is valued for its open access, its landscape and wide views and as a tranquil recreational area. Most of the land at the western end of this Area, from the Needles to Mottistone Down, is open access land belonging to the National Trust. Significant historic landscape features within this Area are identified within this document. The condition of these features and forces for change in the landscape are considered. Management issues are discussed and actions particularly relevant to this Area are identified from those listed in the Isle of Wight HEAP Aims, Objectives and Actions.
  • Historic Environment Action Plan South-West Wight Coastal Zone

    Historic Environment Action Plan South-West Wight Coastal Zone

    Island Heritage Service Historic Environment Action Plan South-West Wight Coastal Zone Isle of Wight County Archaeology and Historic Environment Service October 2008 01983 823810 archaeology @iow.gov.uk Iwight.com HEAP for South-West Wight Coastal Zone INTRODUCTION This HEAP Area has been defined on the basis of geology, topography land use and settlement patterns which differentiate it from other HEAP areas. Essential characteristics of the South-West Wight Coastal Zone include the long coastline and cliffs containing fossils and archaeological material, the pattern of historic lanes, tracks and boundaries, field patterns showing evidence of open-field enclosure, valley-floor land, historic villages, hamlets and dispersed farmsteads, and vernacular architecture. The Military Road provides a scenic and historically significant route along the coast. The settlements of Mottistone, Hulverstone, Brighstone and Shorwell straddle the boundary between this Area and the West Wight Downland Edge & Sandstone Ridge. Historically these settlements exploited both Areas. For the sake of convenience these settlements are described in the HEAP Area document for the West Wight Downland Edge & Sandstone Ridge even where they fall partially within this Area. However, they are also referred to in this HEAP document where appropriate. This document considers the most significant features of the historic landscape, the most important forces for change, and the key management issues. Actions particularly relevant to this Area are identified from those listed in the Isle of Wight HEAP Aims, Objectives and Actions. ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT Location, Geology and Topography • Occupies strip of land between West Wight Downland Edge & Sandstone Ridge and coast. • Coastline within this Area stretches from Compton to Shepherd’s Chine and comprises soft, eroding cliffs with areas of landslip.
  • 461 I. Introduction. and Cardita Deltoidea +

    461 I. Introduction. and Cardita Deltoidea +

    Downloaded from http://jgslegacy.lyellcollection.org/ at University of Oregon on June 23, 2016 ON THE F~0CENE AI~D 0LI60OENE OF THE HAMPSHIRE BASIN. 461 45. On the RELATIONS of the EocEnE and OLIa0CEN~ STRATA in the HA~trSHIR~. BASlI~. By Prof. JoH~ W. JuDD, F.R.S., See. G.S. (Read April 26, 1882.) I. Introduction. SI~cx the publication of my paper "On the Oligocene Strata of the Hampshire Basin" *, I have been favoured with many valuable suggestions and criticisms from geologists, both in this and other countries ; and the time has now perhaps arrived when some of the interesting c!uestions thus raised may be discussed with advantage. The great object of my former memoir was to determine the age and relations of a series of marine beds which contain a highly interesting fauna--a fauna presenting the closest affinities with that of a well-defined system of strata very widely distributed in Central Europe. In framing his classification of the Hampshire Tertiaries, the late Prof. Edward Forbes gave no pIace t~ this important series of beds--a fact which does not seam t~ Iiave bt~ea Strfiiciently considered by those among my critics who h~ve ~mm'rea.r ~ay proposed modifi- cation of Forbes's classification as tmaecessary-ahd, therefore, un- warrantable. The history of the discovery of this i~tevestiug marine series does not appear to be generally known. The late Sir Charles Lycll spent his earliest years in the New Forest, residing at Bartley Lodge near Lyndhurst. At that time shelly marls appear to have been in great request among agriculturists, being employed by them as a manure on some of the poorer soils, like the similar materials of the French Fahluns and our own Crags.
  • Neolithic & Early Bronze Age Isle of Wight

    Neolithic & Early Bronze Age Isle of Wight

    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Resource Assessment The Isle of Wight Ruth Waller, Isle of Wight County Archaeology and Historic Environment Service September 2006 Inheritance: The map of Mesolithic finds on the Isle of Wight shows concentrations of activity in the major river valleys as well two clusters on the north coast around the Newtown Estuary and Wooton to Quarr beaches. Although the latter is likely due to the results of a long term research project, it nevertheless shows an interaction with the river valleys and coastal areas best suited for occupation in the Mesolithic period. In the last synthesis of Neolithic evidence (Basford 1980), it was claimed that Neolithic activity appears to follow the same pattern along the three major rivers with the Western Yar activity centred in an area around the chalk gap, flint scatters along the River Medina and greensand activity along the Eastern Yar. The map of Neolithic activity today shows a much more widely dispersed pattern with clear concentrations around the river valleys, but with clusters of activity around the mouths of the four northern estuaries and along the south coast. As most of the Bronze Age remains recorded on the SMR are not securely dated, it has been difficult to divide the Early from the Late Bronze Age remains. All burial barrows and findspots have been included within this period assessment rather than the Later Bronze Age assessment. Nature of the evidence base: 235 Neolithic records on the County SMR with 202 of these being artefacts, including 77 flint or stone polished axes and four sites at which pottery has been recovered.
  • Coastal Processes Review

    Coastal Processes Review

    Water and Environment Management Framework Lot 3 – Engineering and Related Services West Wight Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy Appendix C - Coastal Processes and Geotechnics Summary August 2015 Document overview Capita | AECOM was commissioned by the Isle of Wight Council in October 2014 to undertake a Coastal Flood and Erosion Risk Management Strategy. As part of this commission, a brief review of coastal processes and geotechnics has been undertaken to inform the option development phase of the Strategy. Document history Version Status Issue date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by George Batt – Assistant Coastal Jonathan Short Engineer Tara-Leigh Draft for – 1 30th March 2015 Jason McVey – comment Senior Coastal Drummond – Associate Specialist Principal Flood and Coastal Specialist George Batt – Assistant Coastal Updated Jonathan Short Engineer Tara-Leigh following – 2 4th August 2015 Jason McVey – client Senior Coastal Drummond – Associate comments Specialist Principal Flood and Coastal Specialist Scott House, Alencon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP. i Limitations Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd (“Capita”) | URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Isle of Wight Council in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by Capita | AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of Capita | AECOM. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate.
  • WALKING EXPERIENCES: TOP of the WIGHT Experience Sustainable Transport

    WALKING EXPERIENCES: TOP of the WIGHT Experience Sustainable Transport

    BE A WALKING EXPERIENCES: TOP OF THE WIGHT Experience sustainable transport Portsmouth To Southampton s y s rr Southsea Fe y Cowe rr Cowe Fe East on - ssenger on - Pa / e assenger l ampt P c h hi Southampt Ve out S THE EGYPT POINT OLD CASTLE POINT e ft SOLENT yd R GURNARD BAY Cowes e 5 East Cowes y Gurnard 3 3 2 rr tsmouth - B OSBORNE BAY ishbournFe de r Lymington F enger Hovercra Ry y s nger Po rr as sse Fe P rtsmouth/Pa - Po e hicl Ve rtsmouth - ssenger Po Rew Street Pa T THORNESS AS BAY CO RIVE E RYDE AG K R E PIER HEAD ERIT M E Whippingham E H RYDE DINA N C R Ve L Northwood O ESPLANADE A 3 0 2 1 ymington - TT PUCKPOOL hic NEWTOWN BAY OO POINT W Fishbourne l Marks A 3 e /P Corner T 0 DODNOR a 2 0 A 3 0 5 4 Ryde ssenger AS CREEK & DICKSONS Binstead Ya CO Quarr Hill RYDE COPSE ST JOHN’S ROAD rmouth Wootton Spring Vale G E R CLA ME RK I N Bridge TA IVE HERSEY RESERVE, Fe R Seaview LAKE WOOTTON SEAVIEW DUVER rr ERI Porcheld FIRESTONE y H SEAGR OVE BAY OWN Wootton COPSE Hamstead PARKHURST Common WT FOREST NE Newtown Parkhurst Nettlestone P SMALLBROOK B 4 3 3 JUNCTION PRIORY BAY NINGWOOD 0 SCONCE BRIDDLESFORD Havenstreet COMMON P COPSES POINT SWANPOND N ODE’S POINT BOULDNOR Cranmore Newtown deserted HAVENSTREET COPSE P COPSE Medieval village P P A 3 0 5 4 Norton Bouldnor Ashey A St Helens P Yarmouth Shaleet 3 BEMBRIDGE Cli End 0 Ningwood Newport IL 5 A 5 POINT R TR LL B 3 3 3 0 YA ASHEY E A 3 0 5 4Norton W Thorley Thorley Street Carisbrooke SHIDE N Green MILL COPSE NU CHALK PIT B 3 3 9 COL WELL BAY FRES R Bembridge B 3 4 0 R I V E R 0 1
  • Isle of Wight Rivers

    Isle of Wight Rivers

    KENT AREA HAMPSHIRE Maidstone AREA Winchester Worthing SUSSEX AREA Area Administrative Boundaries Regional Boundary Area Office Rivers of Regional Headquarters the Isle ENVIRONMENT AGENCY GENERAL ENQUIRY LINE of Wight 0845 933 3111 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY FLOODLINE 0845 988 1188 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY EMERGENCY HOTLINE 0800 80 70 60 FACT FILES 9 Rivers of the Isle of Wight Environment Agency - a better organisation works for the public and environment in England and Wales has specific duties and powers. Lymington Cowes R i East v e The Solent r Cowes for present and future generations. M e The Solent d i n Nationally, around 15 million hectares a Fishbourne ek re Milford- Wootton C Northwood n The Environment Agency is one of the of land are managed by the Agency k o Newtown River t on-Sea o t o o r o B s W ' r world's most powerful environmental along with 36,000km of rivers and e Nettlestone n R e m o l d B v a a g l H e B P a ck Ryde Yarmouth rn ro b e o rid t k g watchdogs, regulating air, land and 5,000km of coastline, including more es e W Bro o Th k St Helens Bembridge o rl water. As 'guardians of the than 2 million hectares of coastal ey Br o Yar o e k n rn r u environment' the Agency has legal waters. Totland ste Bo Newport e l r u a W Y Ca Brading n er st duties to protect and improve the Freshwater Ea There are eight regional offices, which R i r a v Y environment throughout England and e r n r M e t are split into 26 area offices.
  • Location Address1 Address2 Address3 Postcode Asset Type

    Location Address1 Address2 Address3 Postcode Asset Type

    Location Address1 Address2 Address3 Postcode Asset Type Description Tenure Alverstone Land Alverstone Shute Alverstone PO36 0NT Land Freehold Alverstone Grazing Land Alverstone Shute Alverstone PO36 0NT Grazing Land Freehold Arreton Branstone Farm Study Centre Main Road Branstone PO36 0LT Education Other/Childrens Services Freehold Arreton Stockmans House Main Road Branstone PO36 0LT Housing Freehold Arreton St George`s CE Primary School Main Road Arreton PO30 3AD Schools Freehold Arreton Land Off Hazley Combe Arreton PO30 3AD Non-Operational Freehold Arreton Land Main Road Arreton PO30 3AB Schools Leased Arreton Land Arreton Down Arreton PO30 2PA Non-Operational Leased Bembridge Bembridge Library Church Road Bembridge PO35 5NA Libraries Freehold Bembridge Coastguard Lookout Beachfield Road Bembridge PO35 5TN Non-Operational Freehold Bembridge Forelands Middle School Walls Road Bembridge PO35 5RH Schools Freehold Bembridge Bembridge Fire Station Walls Road Bembridge PO35 5RH Fire & Rescue Freehold Bembridge Bembridge CE Primary Steyne Road Bembridge PO35 5UH Schools Freehold Bembridge Toilets Lane End Bembridge PO35 5TB Public Conveniences Freehold Bembridge RNLI Life Boat Station Lane End Bembridge PO35 5TB Coastal Freehold Bembridge Car Park Lane End Forelands PO35 5UE Car Parks Freehold Bembridge Toilets Beach Road / Station Road Bembridge PO35 5NQ Public Conveniences Freehold Bembridge Toilet High Street Bembridge PO35 5SE Public Conveniences Freehold Bembridge Toilets High Street Bembridge PO35 5SD Public Conveniences Freehold Bembridge
  • BULLETIN Aug 2008

    BULLETIN Aug 2008

    August 2008 Issue no. 50 Bulletin Established 1919 www.iwnhas.org Contents Page(s) Page(s) President`s Address 1 In Praise of Ivy 8-11 Notice Board 2 Note from 1923 Proceedings 11 Country Notes 3-4 General Meetings 12-20 Undercliff Walls Survey 4-5 Section Meetings 20-30 Society Library 5 Membership Secretaries` Notes 31 Andy`s Notes 5-6 Megalith Monuments 6-8 An Unusual Moth 8 President's Address On a recent visit to the Society's Headquarters at Ventnor I was handed a piece of paper outlin- ing the duties of the President. One clause seemed directly written to me - the President was “not ex- pected to be expert in all the fields covered by the various sections." As most of you will know, unlike past Presidents who have been specialists, I am very much an ordinary member with a general interest in natural history and archaeology, but my membership over many years has widened my knowledge and kept up a spirit of inquiry. With this in mind last May I joined the general meeting exploring the ground around the glass- houses of Wight Salads, somewhere completely new to me. It proved to be two hours of continuous in- terest as we wandered by the new lakes created from the water used in the hydroponic growing system. With experts in identifying grasses, mosses, flowers, birds all to hand, and all more than willing to point out, identify and explain when I asked any question. It was a real illustration of teaching and learning in the best way.
  • Cattle Bulls, Baiting & Hard Cheese

    Cattle Bulls, Baiting & Hard Cheese

    f olkonwight Island Folk History Adapted from Cock & Bull Stories: Animals in Isle of Wight Folklore, Dialect and Cultural History (2008), by Alan R Phillips C ATTLE BULLS , BAITING & HARD CHEESE Numerous ox bones, many of which had been split open for the extraction of marrow, together with the teeth bones of a horse, were discovered in 1936 by Hubert Poole in a Mesolithic deposit on the east bank of the Newtown River. By the Iron Age dairy and b eef cattle together with sheep would have grazed the Island's meadows and oxen would have have been yoked to a wooden plough, or 'ard'. Courtesy of Isle of Wight Heritage Service Regarding the three - branched prehistoric flint implement known as a tribra ch, which has remained something of a mystery since its discovery most probably at Ventnor in the 1850s, Hubert Poole conjectured in 1941 that if displayed with its longer arm pointing downwards it bears a rough resemblance to the horned head of a bull, wh ich could conceivably have been mounted on a staff and carried in procession. This remains arguably still the best interpretation, though whether one would wish to concur with Poole that it might have been part of a phallic cult (all the rage in archaeolog ical circles when Poole was writing) is perhaps less likely. Poole went on to draw an analogy with the Royal Antediluvian Order of Buffaloes on the Island, which used to carry at an annual church parade a pair of bull's horns mounted on a staff in much th e same way that others carried a banner.
  • Report IOW 6: Colwell Chine to Hamstead Point

    Report IOW 6: Colwell Chine to Hamstead Point

    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Stretch: Isle of Wight Report IOW 6: Colwell Chine to Hamstead Point Part 6.1: Introduction Start Point: Colwell Chine (grid reference 432773.445, 87932.217) End Point: Hamstead Point (grid reference 440904.106, 91960.769) Relevant Maps: IOW 6a to IOW 6f 6.1.1 This is one of a series of linked but legally separate reports published by Natural England under section 51 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949, which make proposals to the Secretary of State for improved public access along and to the Isle of Wight coast. 6.1.2 This report covers length IOW 6 of the stretch, which is the coast between Colwell Chine and Hamstead Point. It makes free-standing statutory proposals for this part of the stretch, and seeks approval for them by the Secretary of State in their own right under section 52 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. 6.1.3 The report explains how we propose to implement the England Coast Path (“the trail”) on this part of the stretch, and details the likely consequences in terms of the wider ‘Coastal Margin’ that will be created if our proposals are approved by the Secretary of State. Our report also sets out: any proposals we think are necessary for restricting or excluding coastal access rights to address particular issues, in line with the powers in the legislation; and any proposed powers for the trail to be capable of being relocated on particular sections (“roll- back”), if this proves necessary in the future because of coastal change.
  • Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2

    Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2

    Isle of Wight Shoreline Management Plan 2 (Review Sub-cell 5d+e) May 2010 Isle of Wight Council, Coastal Management Directorate of Economy & Environment. Director Stuart Love Appendix 1 – DRAFT Policy Unit Options for Public Consultation PDZ1 Gurnard, Cowes and East Cowes (Gurnard Luck to East Cowes Promenade and Entrance to the Medina) (MAN1A) Policy Plan Policy Unit 2025 2055 2105 Comment HTL supports the existing community and allows time for adaptation. Unlikely to qualify for national funding but HTL would allow small scale private defences to be PU1A.1 Gurnard Luck HTL NAI NAI maintained. Moving to NAI reflects the medium to long term increasing risks and need for increasing adaptation. NAI would not preclude maintenance of private defences PU1A.2 Gurnard Cliff NAI NAI NAI Gurnard to Cowes PU1A.3 HTL HTL HTL Parade Recognise that HTL may be difficult to achieve with sea level rise and the community may need to consider PU1A.4 West Cowes HTL HTL HTL coastal adaptation. This will be examined further in the Strategy Study. Recognise that HTL may be difficult to achieve with sea level rise and the community may need to consider PU1A.5 East Cowes HTL HTL HTL coastal adaptation. This will be examined further in the Strategy Study. HTL by maintenance of the existing seawall until the East Cowes Outer PU1A.6 HTL NAI NAI end of its effective life, gradually removing the influence Esplanade of management. Key: HTL - Hold the Line, A - Advance the Line, NAI – No Active Intervention MR – Managed Realignment Medina Estuary and Newport (MAN1B)