Eustress in Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) Students Amanda C
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School October 2018 Eustress in Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) Students Amanda C. Moseley University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Educational Psychology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Moseley, Amanda C., "Eustress in Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) Students" (2018). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7549 This Ed. Specalist is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eustress in Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) Students by Amanda C. Moseley A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Education Specialist Department of Educational and Psychological Studies College of Education University of South Florida Major Professor: Shannon Suldo, Ph.D. Lindsey O’Brennan, Ph.D. Robert Dedrick, Ph.D. Date of Approval: October 1, 2018 Keywords: adolescents, high school accelerated curricula, stress self-report Copyright © 2018, Amanda Moseley ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are several individuals who have supported me throughout the completion of my thesis whom I would like to thank. First, I have had a wonderful thesis committee that has supported and encouraged me throughout this process. Dr. Shannon Suldo has been a constant source of support and encouragement and has helped enormously with this project from conceptualization to completion. I have become a better thinker, writer, and mental health professional due to her guidance and mentoring. I would also like to thank Dr. Robert Dedrick for his thoughtful contribution to the research methodology in this study, and his willingness to support me through complicated analyses. I would also like to thank Dr. Lindsey O’Brennan for constantly being a positive influence and supporter of me throughout this project, and many other endeavors. Additionally, I am thankful to be surrounded my wonderful peers from the USF School Psychology program whom I consider mentors, colleagues, and friends. Last, I am forever grateful to my amazing parents, Ken and Caroline, and my wonderful husband, Ryan, for encouraging me to be the best person I can. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables v List of Figures vi Abstract vii Chapter I: Introduction 1 Statement of the Problem 1 Measurement of eustress. 1 Correlates of eustress. 2 Outcomes of eustress. 3 Eustress in unique youth populations, namely students in accelerated curricula. 4 Purpose of the Study 4 Definition of Key Terms 5 Academic success 6 Advanced Placement (AP). 6 Coping. 6 Emotional well-being. 6 Engagement. 6 Eustress. 6 Flow 7 Grit. 7 International Baccalaureate (IB). 7 Nomological network. 7 Savoring. 7 Self-efficacy. 7 Stress. 7 Student success. 8 Research Questions 8 Hypotheses 9 Significance of the Study 11 Chapter II: Literature Review 13 Conceptualization of Stress 13 Theoretical Background of Stress 15 Holistic Stress Model. 16 Conceptualization of stress in the current study. 17 Conceptualizing Eustress 18 Challenge Stressor-Hindrance Stressor Framework. 23 i Measurement of Eustress 24 Qualitative approach. 25 Quantitative approach. 26 Constructs Related to Eustress among Adolescents 34 The Adolescent Development Context and Stressors 36 Constructs Potentially Associated with Eustress in Adolescents 37 Self-efficacy. 37 Flow. 38 Student engagement. 39 Coping. 41 Grit. 42 Adolescents in Accelerated Curricula 43 Summary of the Literature 46 Chapter III: Methods 48 Participants 48 Issues of Diversity 50 Procedures 51 Data collection. 51 Measures: Nomological Network of Eustress 52 School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised 52 Perceived Stress Scale 54 Eustress Scale 54 Coping with Academic Demands Scale 56 Short Dispositional Flow Scale-2 57 Short Grit Scale 58 Measures: Outcomes 58 Student’s Life Satisfaction Scale 58 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System 59 School Burnout Inventory 59 Academic outcomes 60 Grade Point Average 60 Ethical Concerns 62 Data Analysis 62 Chapter IV: Results 66 Data Screening 66 Data entry 66 Missing data 66 Psychometric Properties of the Eustress Scale 67 Descriptive statistics. 67 Factor structure. 69 Total sample. 69 Gender. 72 ii Grade. 73 Program. 75 Reliability. 76 Eustress by Gender, Grade, and Program 76 Correlates of Eustress 77 Distress. 77 Student engagement. 79 Coping strategies. 82 Self-efficacy. 86 Flow. 87 Grit. 89 Relationship Between Eustress and Student Outcomes 90 Academic Performance. 91 Life Satisfaction. 92 School Burnout. 93 Psychopathology 95 Chapter V: Discussion 99 Measuring Eustress within Adolescents in Rigorous Academic Programs 99 Measuring Eustress within Gender, Grade Level, and Program Subgroups 101 Correlates of Eustress 103 Relationship between Eustress and Student Outcomes 106 Implications for School Psychologists 107 Contributions to the Literature 109 Limitations 111 Summary and Future Directions 112 References 116 Appendices 126 Appendix A: Eustress Scale used by O’Sullivan (2011) 127 Appendix B: Parent Consent Form 128 Appendix C: Student Assent 130 Appendix D: Demographics Form 131 Appendix E: School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised (SAAS-R) 132 Appendix F: Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) 134 Appendix G: Modified Eustress Scale 135 Appendix H: Coping with Academic Demands Scale (CADS) 136 Appendix I: Short Grit Scale 140 Appendix J: Student Life Satisfaction Scale (SLSS) 142 Appendix K: School Burnout Inventory (SBI) 143 Appendix L: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Gender 144 Appendix M: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Grade 145 Appendix N: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Program 147 iii Appendix O: Eustress Distress Model 148 Appendix P: Eustress Affective Engagement Model 149 Appendix Q: Eustress Cognitive Engagement Model 150 Appendix R: Eustress Time and Task Management Model 151 Appendix S: Eustress Cognitive Reappraisal Model 152 Appendix T: Eustress Talk with Classmates and Friends Model 153 Appendix U: Eustress Deterioration Model 154 Appendix V: Eustress Self-Efficacy Model 155 Appendix W: Eustress Flow Model 156 Appendix X: Eustress Grit Model 157 Appendix Y: Model Fit Information for Eustress and Student Outcomes 158 Appendix Z: Permission Information for Figure 2 159 Appendix AA: IRB Approval Letter 160 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Eustress Self-Report Measure 32 Table 2: Demographic Characteristics of Participants 49 Table 3: Measures Selected from Primary Data Set 61 Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for Eustress Items 69 Table 5: Model Fit Indices for Eustress Measure 73 Table 6: Descriptive Statistics for Distress 79 Table 7: Descriptive Statistics for Student Engagement 81 Table 8: Descriptive Statistics for Coping Strategies 84 Table 9: Descriptive Statistics for Self-Efficacy 88 Table 10: Descriptive Statistics for Flow 89 Table 11: Descriptive Statistics for Grit 90 Table 12: Eustress and Student Outcomes Coefficients and Significance 92 Table 13: Descriptive Statistics for Life Satisfaction 93 Table 14: Descriptive Statistics for School Burnout 95 Table 15: Descriptive Statistics for Psychopathology 97 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Seyle’s Conceptualization of Stress 14 Figure 2: Holistic Model of Stress 17 Figure 3: Yerkes-Dodson Law 21 Figure 4: Potential Nomological Network Diagram of Eustress, with Corresponding Measure(s) Indicated in Far-Right Column 51 Figure 5: Factor Diagram for Eustress Measure 71 vi ABSTRACT Eustress, the positive response to stress, is a relatively understudied concept. Most of the research on eustress has been concentrated in the occupational and management setting. Empirical studies of eustress in adolescents are absent, even though youth experience unique sources and magnitudes of stress. Specifically, Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) students report more stress than their general education peers but excel in their rigorous academic program. Eustress is related to a variety of positive psychological and physiological outcomes among adult samples, which makes it an important concept to explore in adolescent samples. Many constructs such as self-efficacy, hope, meaningfulness, flow, engagement and coping have correlated with eustress among samples of adults. This study investigated different aspects of eustress in a sample of 2379 AP and IB students (grades 9 – 12), and explored if its relationship with positive outcomes (among adults) holds true in this population. First, the psychometric properties of a modified self-report measure of eustress were examined. Results from this study supported a five-item eustress measure that had adequate reliability (α= .85) and construct validity based on a confirmatory factor analysis. Second, differences between the eustress measure in different subgroups, namely gender, grade level, and academic program were explored. Only a significant difference in eustress was found between grade levels, indicating that students in upper grade levels had higher levels of eustress. Third, relationships between eustress scores and a nomological network of theoretically similar vii constructs (potential correlates) and salient outcomes – indicators of students’ academic and emotional success— were examined. Consistent with