DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Uses That Support Wild Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) Communities Within an Agricultural Matrix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Uses That Support Wild Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) Communities Within an Agricultural Matrix Land uses that support wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) communities within an agricultural matrix A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Elaine Celeste Evans IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Marla Spivak December 2016 © Elaine Evans 2016 Acknowledgements Many people helped me successfully complete this project. Many years ago, my advisor, mentor, hero, and friend, Marla Spivak, saw potential in me and helped me to become an effective scientist and educator working to create a more bee-friendly world. I have benefitted immensely from her guidance and support. The Bee Lab team, both those that helped me directly in the field, and those that advised along the way through analysis and writing, have provided a dreamy workplace: Joel Gardner, Matt Smart, Renata Borba, Katie Lee, Gary Reuter, Becky Masterman, Judy Wu, Ian Lane, Morgan Carr- Markell. My committee helped guide me along the way and steer me in the right direction: Dan Cariveau (gold star for much advice on analysis), Diane Larson, Ralph Holzenthal, and Karen Oberauser. Cooperation with Chip Eullis and Jordan Neau at the USGS enabled detailed land use analysis. The bee taxonomists who helped me with bee identification were essential for the success of this project: Jason Gibbs, John Ascher, Sam Droege, Mike Arduser, and Karen Wright. My friends and family eased my burden with their enthusiasm for me to follow my passion and their understanding of my monomania. My husband Paul Metzger and my son August supported me in uncountable ways. My parents, Bob and Liz Evans, are probably more excited than anyone about my accomplishments. My mother-in-law Dr. Marcia Walsch showed the way to achieve academic excellence, maintain broad interests in the world, all while raising a family. My friends Amy Krueger, Marlijn Hoogendoorn, and Lesley Tylczak all make the world a better place all the time. Much love to my dogs Scooter and King. My musical community helped provide essential life balance: International Novelty Gamelan, Milo Fine, Emel Sherzad, Jim Harpole, and Daniel Furuta. i Dedication This thesis is dedicated to Bombus terricola , once the most common bees in eastern North Dakota, now <0.00001% of the bees there. It is my hope that habitat improvements such as those recommended in this work can help populations of this and other bees suffering declines recover and remain a part of our world. ii Abstract My main aim in this thesis was to explore if there are habitat elements within the agricultural matrix that support bee diversity and abundance. I examined the influence of land-use on bee diversity in a predominantly agricultural landscape at sites varying in habitat thought to be bee-friendly, such as semi-natural lands, grasslands, and crops providing bee forage. I sought to determine whether and to what extent these potentially bee-friendly land uses support diverse bee communities. Bees found near crops not providing forage, including corn, soybean, and wheat, had less functional diversity. Bees found near semi-natural lands that contained flowers providing bee forage had increased functional diversity. Wooded areas were associated with increased bee species richness and bee abundance, and wetlands were associated with greater bee abundance. Crops providing bee forage were associated with increased bee species richness and diversity. Altering land management practices to promote retention and enhancement of these land uses will help support diverse wild bee communities within agricultural matrices. I also compared responses of wild bees and commercially managed honey bee colonies to bee-friendly land uses. Both honey bees and wild bees responded positively to semi-natural lands and crops providing bee forage. Examination of past and present bee and floral visitation records revealed a 16 to 30% loss of species richness. The bee genera Lasioglossum , Mellisodes, Halictus, and Ceratina increased in relative abundance more than 50%, while the genera Bombus, Megachile, and Colletes, decreased in relative abundance more than 65% and the genus Andrena decreased in relative abundance by 47%. The plant genera that received the most bee visits from 2010 to 2012 were Melilotus, Sonchus, and Cirsium, while the plants with the highest number of bee species visitors were Solidago, Cirsium , and Sonchus . The plant genera Zizia , Hydrophyllum , and Dalea all received more visitation in the past. This survey of flower visitors revealed a community in need of conservation with a remaining species pool to enable recovery given improvements in available habitat. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... i Dedication ........................................................................................................................ ii Abstract ........................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................. vii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1 . ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Importance of bees for pollination .................................................................... 1 1.2 Bee natural history ............................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 Bee Phylogeny .............................................................................................. 2 1.2.2 Bee habitat .................................................................................................... 2 1.2.3 Solitary and social bees ................................................................................. 4 1.2.4 Life history traits of Northern Great Plains bee genera ................................ 5 1.3 Bee decline ........................................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Habitat Loss ................................................................................................ 10 1.3.1.2 Nesting resources .................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 Land use ...................................................................................................... 11 1.3.3 Pesticides..................................................................................................... 13 1.3.4 Climate Change ........................................................................................... 14 1.3.5 Introduced species ....................................................................................... 15 1.3.6 Competition among bees............................................................................. 15 1.3.7 Natural Enemies .......................................................................................... 16 1.3.8 Pathogens .................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Agricultural land uses supporting wild bee communities ............................... 17 1.5 Response of honey bees and wild bees to pollinator habitat .......................... 19 1.6 Bees and other flower visitors in agricultural lands in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota .......................................................................................................... 20 1.7 Future directions ............................................................................................. 22 iv Chapter 2 . ..................................................................................................................... 24 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 25 2.2 Methods........................................................................................................... 27 2.2.1 Study area.................................................................................................... 27 2.2.2 Survey locations .......................................................................................... 28 2.2.3 Landscape characterization ......................................................................... 28 2.2.4 Wild bee survey .......................................................................................... 30 2.2.5 Statistical analyses ...................................................................................... 36 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................. 37 2.3.1 Bee diversity ............................................................................................... 38 2.3.2 Bee community measures related to land use ............................................. 39 2.3.3 Floral use by bees........................................................................................ 40 2.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 41 2.5 Figures............................................................................................................. 47 2.6 Tables .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comprehensive Guide to Insects of Britain & Ireland
    a comprehensive guide to insects of Britain & ireland To be launched Spring 2014. order your copy now and save over £7.50! Offer endS 31 March 2014 Special expected list price: £27.50 Pre-Publication special price: £19.95 offer you save: £7.50 A comprehensive guide to Insects of Britain & irelAnd by Paul D. Brock Special expected list price: £27.50 * Scientific Associate of the Pre-Publication special price: £19.95 Natural History Museum, offer you save: £7.50 London, and author of the acclaimed ‘Insects of the New Forest’ full colour photographs throughout, with fully comprehensive sections on all insect 2 Ants, bees and wasps Subfamily Andreninae Ants, bees and wasps 3 Andrena species form the majority of this large subfamily of small to large, mining (soil-nesting) bees; very few groups, including flies, bees and wasps nest communally. There are sometimes several species with similar appearance, thus care is needed in identification. Many have a single brood, but identification of others with two broods is so by seasonal variation. In a few species, giant males occur, with large heads and mandibles. metimes complicated species and a few Sphecodes species are cleptoparasites and parasitic flies are often seen around Colourful nests where it is fascinating to watch their behaviour. A selection of species in this popular genus is include Nomada widespread, some are very local. ISBN 978-1-874357-58-2 d; although Andrena angustior Body length: 8–11 mm. Small, distinguished by the long marginal area on 2nd tergite. Cleptoparasite probably Nomada fabriciana Flexibound, 195 × 135mm, around 500pp woodlands, meadows and sometimes heaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera; Andrenidae) Manuela Giovanetti, Eloisa Lasso
    Body size, loading capacity and rate of reproduction in the communal bee Andrena agilissima (Hymenoptera; Andrenidae) Manuela Giovanetti, Eloisa Lasso To cite this version: Manuela Giovanetti, Eloisa Lasso. Body size, loading capacity and rate of reproduction in the com- munal bee Andrena agilissima (Hymenoptera; Andrenidae). Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2005, 36 (3), pp.439-447. hal-00892151 HAL Id: hal-00892151 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00892151 Submitted on 1 Jan 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 36 (2005) 439–447 © INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2005 439 DOI: 10.1051/apido:2005028 Original article Body size, loading capacity and rate of reproduction in the communal bee Andrena agilissima (Hymenoptera; Andrenidae)1 Manuela GIOVANETTIa*, Eloisa LASSOb** a Dip. Biologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy b Dep. Plant Biology, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Av., 265 Morrill Hall, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Received 12 February 2004 – revised 3 November 2004 – accepted 12 November 2004 Published online 9 August 2005 Abstract – In bees, body size may be particularly important in determining the loading capacity, and consequently the rate of reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialist Foragers in Forest Bee Communities Are Small, Social Or Emerge Early
    Received: 5 November 2018 | Accepted: 2 April 2019 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13003 RESEARCH ARTICLE Specialist foragers in forest bee communities are small, social or emerge early Colleen Smith1,2 | Lucia Weinman1,2 | Jason Gibbs3 | Rachael Winfree2 1GraDuate Program in Ecology & Evolution, Rutgers University, New Abstract Brunswick, New Jersey 1. InDiviDual pollinators that specialize on one plant species within a foraging bout 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution, and transfer more conspecific and less heterospecific pollen, positively affecting plant Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey reproDuction. However, we know much less about pollinator specialization at the 3Department of Entomology, University of scale of a foraging bout compared to specialization by pollinator species. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanaDa 2. In this stuDy, we measured the Diversity of pollen carried by inDiviDual bees forag- Correspondence ing in forest plant communities in the miD-Atlantic United States. Colleen Smith Email: [email protected] 3. We found that inDiviDuals frequently carried low-Diversity pollen loaDs, suggest- ing that specialization at the scale of the foraging bout is common. InDiviDuals of Funding information Xerces Society for Invertebrate solitary bee species carried higher Diversity pollen loaDs than Did inDiviDuals of Conservation; Natural Resources social bee species; the latter have been better stuDied with respect to foraging Conservation Service; GarDen Club of America bout specialization, but account for a small minority of the worlD’s bee species. Bee boDy size was positively correlated with pollen load Diversity, and inDiviDuals HanDling EDitor: Julian Resasco of polylectic (but not oligolectic) species carried increasingly Diverse pollen loaDs as the season progresseD, likely reflecting an increase in the Diversity of flowers in bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Management and Ecology of Northeastern North
    THE CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH AMERICAN BUMBLE BEES AMANDA LICZNER A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN BIOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO September 2020 © Amanda Liczner, 2020 ii Abstract Bumble bees (Bombus spp.; Apidae) are among the pollinators most in decline globally with a main cause being habitat loss. Habitat requirements for bumble bees are poorly understood presenting a research gap. The purpose of my dissertation is to characterize the habitat of bumble bees at different spatial scales using: a systematic literature review of bumble bee nesting and overwintering habitat globally (Chapter 1); surveys of local and landcover variables for two at-risk bumble bee species (Bombus terricola, and B. pensylvanicus) in southern Ontario (Chapter 2); identification of conservation priority areas for bumble bee species in Canada (Chapter 3); and an analysis of the methodology for locating bumble bee nests using detection dogs (Chapter 4). The main findings were current literature on bumble bee nesting and overwintering habitat is limited and biased towards the United Kingdom and agricultural habitats (Ch.1). Bumble bees overwinter underground, often on shaded banks or near trees. Nests were mostly underground and found in many landscapes (Ch.1). B. terricola and B. pensylvanicus have distinct habitat characteristics (Ch.2). Landscape predictors explained more variation in the species data than local or floral resources (Ch.2). Among local variables, floral resources were consistently important throughout the season (Ch.2). Most bumble bee conservation priority areas are in western Canada, southern Ontario, southern Quebec and across the Maritimes and are most often located within woody savannas (Ch.3).
    [Show full text]
  • NENHC 2013 Oral Presentation Abstracts
    Oral Presentation Abstracts Listed alphabetically by presenting author. Presenting author names appear in bold. Code following abstract refers to session presentation was given in (Day [Sun = Sunday, Mon = Monday] – Time slot [AM1 = early morning session, AM2 = late morning session, PM1 = early afternoon session, PM2 = late afternoon session] – Room – Presentation sequence. For example, Mon-PM1-B-3 indicates: Monday early afternoon session in room B, and presentation was the third in sequence of presentations for that session. Using that information and the overview of sessions chart below, one can see that it was part of the “Species-Specific Management of Invasives” session. Presenters’ contact information is provided in a separate list at the end of this document. Overview of Oral Presentation Sessions SUNDAY MORNING SUNDAY APRIL 14, 2013 8:30–10:00 Concurrent Sessions - Morning I Room A Room B Room C Room D Cooperative Regional (Multi- Conservation: state) In-situ Breeding Ecology of Ant Ecology I Working Together to Reptile/Amphibian Songbirds Reintroduce and Conservation Establish Species 10:45– Concurrent Sessions - Morning II 12:40 Room A Room B Room C Room D Hemlock Woolly Bird Migration and Adelgid and New Marine Ecology Urban Ecology Ecology England Forests 2:00–3:52 Concurrent Sessions - Afternoon I Room A Room B Room C Room D A Cooperative Effort to Identify and Impacts on Natural History and Use of Telemetry for Report Newly Biodiversity of Trends in Northern Study of Aquatic Emerging Invasive Hydraulic Fracturing Animals
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Bee Declines and Changes in Plant-Pollinator Networks Over 125 Years Revealed Through Museum Collections
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2018 WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS Minna Mathiasson University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Mathiasson, Minna, "WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS" (2018). Master's Theses and Capstones. 1192. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/1192 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILD BEE DECLINES AND CHANGES IN PLANT-POLLINATOR NETWORKS OVER 125 YEARS REVEALED THROUGH MUSEUM COLLECTIONS BY MINNA ELIZABETH MATHIASSON BS Botany, University of Maine, 2013 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences: Integrative and Organismal Biology May, 2018 This thesis has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences: Integrative and Organismal Biology by: Dr. Sandra M. Rehan, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. Carrie Hall, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. Janet Sullivan, Adjunct Associate Professor of Biology On April 18, 2018 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Larose Forest (Excluding Lepidoptera and Odonates)
    Insects of Larose Forest (Excluding Lepidoptera and Odonates) • Non-native species indicated by an asterisk* • Species in red are new for the region EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies Baetidae Small Minnow Mayflies Baetidae sp. Small minnow mayfly Caenidae Small Squaregills Caenidae sp. Small squaregill Ephemerellidae Spiny Crawlers Ephemerellidae sp. Spiny crawler Heptageniiidae Flatheaded Mayflies Heptageniidae sp. Flatheaded mayfly Leptophlebiidae Pronggills Leptophlebiidae sp. Pronggill PLECOPTERA Stoneflies Perlodidae Perlodid Stoneflies Perlodid sp. Perlodid stonefly ORTHOPTERA Grasshoppers, Crickets and Katydids Gryllidae Crickets Gryllus pennsylvanicus Field cricket Oecanthus sp. Tree cricket Tettigoniidae Katydids Amblycorypha oblongifolia Angular-winged katydid Conocephalus nigropleurum Black-sided meadow katydid Microcentrum sp. Leaf katydid Scudderia sp. Bush katydid HEMIPTERA True Bugs Acanthosomatidae Parent Bugs Elasmostethus cruciatus Red-crossed stink bug Elasmucha lateralis Parent bug Alydidae Broad-headed Bugs Alydus sp. Broad-headed bug Protenor sp. Broad-headed bug Aphididae Aphids Aphis nerii Oleander aphid* Paraprociphilus tesselatus Woolly alder aphid Cicadidae Cicadas Tibicen sp. Cicada Cicadellidae Leafhoppers Cicadellidae sp. Leafhopper Coelidia olitoria Leafhopper Cuernia striata Leahopper Draeculacephala zeae Leafhopper Graphocephala coccinea Leafhopper Idiodonus kelmcottii Leafhopper Neokolla hieroglyphica Leafhopper 1 Penthimia americana Leafhopper Tylozygus bifidus Leafhopper Cercopidae Spittlebugs Aphrophora cribrata
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Halictophagus, Insecta, Strepsiptera, Halictophagidae
    Zootaxa 1056: 1–18 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1056 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Halictophagus (Insecta: Strepsiptera: Halicto- phagidae) from Texas, and a checklist of Strepsiptera from the United States and Canada JEYARANEY KATHIRITHAMBY1 & STEVEN J. TAYLOR2 1Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K. [email protected] 2Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive (MC-652), Champaign IL 61820-6970 U.S.A. [email protected] Correspondence: Jeyaraney Kathirithamby Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K.; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new species of Halictophagidae (Insecta: Strepsiptera), Halictophagus forthoodiensis Kathirith- amby & Taylor, is described from Texas, USA. We also present a key to 5 families, and a check-list of 11 genera and 84 species of Strepsiptera known from USA and Canada. Key words: Strepsiptera, Halictophagus, Texas, USA, Canada Introduction Five families and eighty three species of Strepsiptera have been recorded so far from USA and Canada of which thirteen are Halictophagus. Key to the families of adult male Strepsiptera found in USA and Canada 1. Mandibles absent..................................................................................... Corioxenidae – Mandibles present ........................................................................................................ 2 2. Legs with
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Bee Communities Within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity
    sustainability Article Unique Bee Communities within Vacant Lots and Urban Farms Result from Variation in Surrounding Urbanization Intensity Frances S. Sivakoff ID , Scott P. Prajzner and Mary M. Gardiner * ID Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] (F.S.S.); [email protected] (S.P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-330-601-6628 Received: 1 May 2018; Accepted: 5 June 2018; Published: 8 June 2018 Abstract: We investigated the relative importance of vacant lot and urban farm habitat features and their surrounding landscape context on bee community richness, abundance, composition, and resource use patterns. Three years of pan trap collections from 16 sites yielded a rich assemblage of bees from vacant lots and urban farms, with 98 species documented. We collected a greater bee abundance from vacant lots, and the two forms of greenspace supported significantly different bee communities. Plant–pollinator networks constructed from floral visitation observations revealed that, while the average number of bees utilizing available resources, niche breadth, and niche overlap were similar, the composition of floral resources and common foragers varied by habitat type. Finally, we found that the proportion of impervious surface and number of greenspace patches in the surrounding landscape strongly influenced bee assemblages. At a local scale (100 m radius), patch isolation appeared to limit colonization of vacant lots and urban farms. However, at a larger landscape scale (1000 m radius), increasing urbanization resulted in a greater concentration of bees utilizing vacant lots and urban farms, illustrating that maintaining greenspaces provides important habitat, even within highly developed landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversified Floral Resource Plantings Support Bee Communities After
    www.nature.com/scientificreports Corrected: Publisher Correction OPEN Diversifed Floral Resource Plantings Support Bee Communities after Apple Bloom in Commercial Orchards Sarah Heller1,2,5,6, Neelendra K. Joshi1,2,3,6*, Timothy Leslie4, Edwin G. Rajotte2 & David J. Biddinger1,2* Natural habitats, comprised of various fowering plant species, provide food and nesting resources for pollinator species and other benefcial arthropods. Loss of such habitats in agricultural regions and in other human-modifed landscapes could be a factor in recent bee declines. Artifcially established foral plantings may ofset these losses. A multi-year, season-long feld study was conducted to examine how wildfower plantings near commercial apple orchards infuenced bee communities. We examined bee abundance, species richness, diversity, and species assemblages in both the foral plantings and adjoining apple orchards. We also examined bee community subsets, such as known tree fruit pollinators, rare pollinator species, and bees collected during apple bloom. During this study, a total of 138 species of bees were collected, which included 100 species in the foral plantings and 116 species in the apple orchards. Abundance of rare bee species was not signifcantly diferent between apple orchards and the foral plantings. During apple bloom, the known tree fruit pollinators were more frequently captured in the orchards than the foral plantings. However, after apple bloom, the abundance of known tree fruit pollinating bees increased signifcantly in the foral plantings, indicating potential for foral plantings to provide additional food and nesting resources when apple fowers are not available. Insect pollinators are essential in nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, and the ecosystem services they provide are vital to both wild plant communities and agricultural crop production.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Bumble Bee Diversity, Distribution, and Status for the Michigan Wildlife Action Plan
    Assessing Bumble Bee Diversity, Distribution, and Status for the Michigan Wildlife Action Plan Prepared By: Logan M. Rowe, David L. Cuthrell, and Helen D. Enander Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan State University Extension P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901 Prepared For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division 12/17/2019 MNFI Report No. 2019-33 Suggested Citation: Rowe, L. M., D. L. Cuthrell., H. D. Enander. 2019. Assessing Bumble Bee Diversity, Distribution, and Status for the Michigan Wildlife Action Plan. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2019- 33, Lansing, USA. Copyright 2019 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. MSU Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover: Bombus terricola taken by D. L. Cuthrell Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Museum Searches ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]