DOCSLIB.ORG

World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale Arxiv:2005.04100V2 [Physics.Pop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Ships: Feasibility and Rationale Arxiv:2005.04100V2 [Physics.Pop World ships: Feasibility and Rationale Andreas Makoto Hein∗1, Cameron Smith2, Fred´ eric´ Marin3, and Kai Staats4 1Initiative for Interstellar Studies, 27-29 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1SZ, United Kingdom 2Department of Anthropology, Portland State University Portland, OR, 97207, USA 3Universite´ de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, F-67000 Strasbourg, France 4Arizona State University Interplanetary Initiative, Phoenix, Arizona, USA Abstract ing its economic feasibility beyond the year 2300, and the development of a maintenance World ships are hypothetical, large, self- system capable of detecting, replacing, and re- contained spacecraft for crewed interstellar pairing several components per second. The travel, taking centuries to reach other stars. emergence of alternative, less costly modes of Due to their crewed nature, size, and long trip crewed interstellar travel at an earlier point in times, the feasibility of world ships faces an time might render world ships obsolete. additional set of challenges compared to in- terstellar probes. Despite their emergence in the 1980s, most of these topics remain unex- 1 Introduction plored. This article revisits some of the key feasibility issues of world ships. First, defi- World ships are hypothetical large, self- nitions of world ships from the literature are contained, self-sufficient crewed spacecraft revisited and the notion of world ship posi- for interstellar travel. Large, artificial habi- tioned with respect to similar concepts such tats appeared in the literature as early as 1929 as generation ships. Second, the key question in Bernal’s ”The World, the Flesh and the of population size is revisited in light of re- Devil” [13]. However, the notion was exten- cent results from the literature. Third, socio- sively discussed for the first time in a spe- technical and economic feasibility issues are cial issue of the Journal of the British Inter- evaluated. Finally, world ships are compared planetary Society (BIS) in 1984. Martin [56] to potential alternative modes of crewed inter- characterizes a world ship as a large, lumber- arXiv:2005.04100v2 [physics.pop-ph] 12 May 2020 stellar travel. Key roadblocks for world ships ing vehicle, moving at a fraction of a per cent are the considerable resources required, shift- of the speed of light and taking millennia to complete a journey between stars. Martin [56] ∗Corresponding author. E-mail: an- presents a rationale for world ships, cost es- [email protected] timates, and how scenarios for their construc- 1 Table 1: Crewed starship categories with respect to cruise velocity and population size. Population size Cruise velocity < 1000 < 100,000 > 100,000 [%c] > 10 Sprinter Colony ship - < 10 Slow boat Colony ship World ship < 1 - Colony ship World ship Figure 1: Concept map for crewed interstellar starships. tion and colonization might look like. In the there is no fundamental technical, economic, special issue, Bond and Martin [15] present or social reason which would prohibit the con- an analysis of engineering feasibility, includ- struction of world ships. However, due to their ing two types of world ships, each with a dif- mass on the order of billions of tons, their con- ferent (land or sea-based) environment for its struction is estimated to take place several cen- crew to live in. Grant [33] goes on to analyze turies in the future [56], when humanity would the stability of isolated world ship populations have control over solar system resources. and fleets, and Smith [70] provides scenarios Apart from world ships, Finney and Jones for how life on a world ship might look like. [27] and Kondo [48] have explored in their Finally, Holmes [43] provides a sociological edited volumes the idea of generation ships in perspective on world ships and how isolated general, with contributions covering technical, communities could be sustained over millen- cultural, and social aspects. nia. The special issue’s articles conclude that In 2011, a World Ship Symposium was or- 2 ganized by the BIS, resulting in another world lation sizes are again obtained [53, 55, 54]. ship JBIS special issue in 2012, including con- Apart from population size estimations, tributions dealing with the shift from a plane- world ships have been treated in dedicated tary to a space-based civilization [5, 6], financ- workshop tracks at the Tennessee Valley Inter- ing such projects [17], and propulsion systems stellar Workshop (TVIW) in 2016 and 2017, [57]. Notably, Hein et al. Ceyssens et al. emphasizing ecological engineering issues of [17] analyzed how a world ship project might world ships [18]. Furthermore, in 2015, a be funded and proposes a long-term invest- student team at the International Space Uni- ment approach in which funds are accumu- versity (ISU) has developed the ”Astra Plan- lated over centuries. Hein et al. [38] provide a eta” concept for a world ship, covering a wide reassessment of world ship feasibility, taking range of topics, such as technical, legal, soci- additional aspects such as knowledge trans- etal aspects, as well as governance and financ- fer and reliability into account. Furthermore, ing [2]. a fundamental trade-off between trip duration This paper provides an updated overview of and population size is hypothesized, as longer research on world ships. It covers some cru- trip durations require a larger population num- cial topics such as how to define world ships, ber for sustaining the required skillset. From population size, socio-technical and economic a reliability perspective, it is concluded that feasibility, and how world ships might fit into an extremely complex technical system such the broader landscape of crewed interstellar as a world ship would require a sophisticated travel concepts. maintenance system, as the number of compo- nents that would need to be replaced, repaired, or both amounts to several per second. 2 Revisiting definitions Some of the team members who worked on this paper subsequently founded Project An attempt to distinguish between different Hyperion in the context of Icarus Interstel- concepts for crewed interstellar travel was pro- lar. Within Project Hyperion, Smith [71] pub- vided in Hein et al. [38]. The distinction is lished a seminal article on the required popula- made based on two dimensions: cruise veloc- tion size for a world ship for trip times of sev- ity and population size. Crewed starships with eral centuries. He concludes that a population populations below 1000 and a velocity higher size that takes genetic drift and catastrophic than 10% of the speed of light are called events into account would comprise several “sprinter”, slower starships with a similar crew tens of thousands of people. The paper re- size “slow boat” and starships with a popu- ceived a lot of attention, in particular, as it con- lation size below 100,000 are called “colony tradicts previous population estimates, which ship”. World ships are defined as crewed star- were much lower, such as just a few crew ships with populations over 100,000 and a ve- members in Finney and Jones [27]. It also locity below 10% of the speed of light. As confirms that longer trip times correlate with a result, we get the following three criteria, larger population sizes. More recently, a team adapted from [38]: lead by Marin presented a further analysis of population size, in which much smaller popu- • Self-sufficiency: thousands of years 3 • Population size: > 100,000 and a given population size. ”World” com- monly denominates Earth with all life and hu- • Cruise velocity: < 1%c man civilization. If this is what we mean by ”world” in ”world ship,” any spacecraft An overview of these concepts is shown in with a closed habitat containing life and a hu- Table 1 and Fig. 1. Fig. 1, in particular, man civilization could be called ”world ship.” shows a concept map for crewed interstellar However, this interpretation of ”world” has spacecraft from Hein et al. [38]. It can be the connotation of a habitat with an enormous seen that all four concepts of crewed starships size. We can even imagine a habitat the size (sprinter, slow boat, colony ship, world ship) of a planet, along with the living conditions are generation ships and also considered inter- on a planet. We will later present such a stellar arks. planet-sized world ship, based on the McK- There are several assumptions behind this endree Cylinder in Section 3. The etymology taxonomy and concept map. First, the popula- of ”world” allows for an alternative interpre- tion size should be taken as order of magnitude tation, where ”world” indicates a material uni- values and are somewhat arbitrary. One could verse or ontology. A ”world ship” would then draw an alternative demarcation line at one be a ship which, for humans on-board, would million between colony ships and world ships. represent ”all there is,” not only in a material Hence, it might be better to rather speak of sense (what is inside the habitat, spacecraft a fuzzy demarcation line between these con- subsystems, etc.) but also in terms of what hu- cepts. For example, in Hein et al. [38], a mans would conceive as the ”reality” in which world ship design is presented, based on sev- they live. Hence, departing from the existing eral stacked Stanford Tori. The Stanford Torus definitions in the literature, interesting new in- was imagined for population sizes of about terpretations of world ships are possible, going 10,000 to 100,000, but it can be seen that by back to the meaning of ”world.” stacking a sufficient number of Tori, a popula- tion of 100,000 to one million can be accom- modated without fundamentally changing the 3 World ship designs nature of the spacecraft. Second, the veloc- ity range of world ships is larger than in Mar- World ships designs are usually dominated by tin [56], extending velocities to below 0.1c, as a large habitat section and a comparatively there is no physical or engineering reason why small propulsion section.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Space Launch System for Exploration and Science. K
    45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2014) 2234.pdf THE SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM FOR EXPLORATION AND SCIENCE. K. Klaus1, M. S. Elsperman1, B. B. Donahue1, K. E. Post1, M. L. Raftery1, and D. B. Smith1, 1The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Blvd, Houston TX 77059, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], mi- [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Introduction: The Space Launch System (SLS) is same time which will simplify mission design and re- the most powerful rocket ever built and provides a duce launch costs. One of the key features of the SLS critical heavy-lift launch capability enabling diverse in cislunar space is performance to provide “dual-use”, deep space missions. This exploration class vehicle i.e. Orion plus 15t of any other payload. launches larger payloads farther in our solar system An opportunity exists to deliver payload to the lu- and faster than ever before. Available fairing diameters nar surface or lunar orbit on the unmanned 2017 range from 5 m to 10 m; these allow utilization of ex- MPCV/ SLS test flight (~4.5t of mass margin exists for isting systems which reduces development risks, size this flight). Concepts of this nature can be done for limitations and cost. SLS injection capacity shortens less than Discovery class mission budgets (~$450M) mission travel time. Enhanced capabilities enable a and may be done as a joint venture by the NASA Sci- variety of missions including human exploration, plan- ence Mission Directorate and Human Exploration Op- etary science, astrophysics, heliophysics, planetary erations Mission Directorate using the successful Lu- defense, Earth observaton and commercial space en- nar Reconnaissance Orbiter as a program model.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects
    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Available Online Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 6(11):202-215 Research Article Theoretical
    Available online www.jsaer.com Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 6(11):202-215 ISSN: 2394-2630 Research Article CODEN(USA): JSERBR Theoretical Consideration of Star Trek's Space Navigation Yoshinari Minami Advanced Space Propulsion Investigation Laboratory (ASPIL), (Formerly NEC Space Development Division), Japan, E-Mail: [email protected] Abstract As is well known, Star Trek is a masterpiece that has been known worldwide since 1966 as a science fiction set in the famous galaxy universe. A starship (Enterprise) arrives at a star system in a short period of time to a star system that is tens, hundreds and thousands of light years away from the Earth. This method of making a starship reach a distant star system is skillfully expressed in the movie using images. Unfortunately, however, there is no concrete explanation from the physical point of view of the propulsion method of the starship and the principle of warp navigation, that is, the space propulsion theory and the space navigation theory. This paper is an attempt to explain Star Trek's space navigation by applying the hyper-space navigation theory to the field propulsion theory that the author has published in international conferences and peer-reviewed journals since 1993 [1]. Since this paper mainly describes the concept of the principle, most of the mathematical expressions are reduced. See the references for theoretical formulas [1- 6]. Keywords Star Trek; starship; galaxy; space-time; interstellar travel; star flight; navigation; field propulsion; space drive; imaginary time; hyperspace; wormhole; time hole; astrophysics 1. Introduction Space development in the 21st century, unless there is a groundbreaking advance in the space transportation system, the area of activity of human beings will be restricted to the vicinity of the Earth forever and new knowledge cannot be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Speculative Fiction in College: a Pedagogy for Making English Studies Relevant
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University English Dissertations Department of English Summer 8-7-2012 Teaching Speculative Fiction in College: A Pedagogy for Making English Studies Relevant James H. Shimkus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss Recommended Citation Shimkus, James H., "Teaching Speculative Fiction in College: A Pedagogy for Making English Studies Relevant." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2012. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/english_diss/95 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of English at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in English Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEACHING SPECULATIVE FICTION IN COLLEGE: A PEDAGOGY FOR MAKING ENGLISH STUDIES RELEVANT by JAMES HAMMOND SHIMKUS Under the Direction of Dr. Elizabeth Burmester ABSTRACT Speculative fiction (science fiction, fantasy, and horror) has steadily gained popularity both in culture and as a subject for study in college. While many helpful resources on teaching a particular genre or teaching particular texts within a genre exist, college teachers who have not previously taught science fiction, fantasy, or horror will benefit from a broader pedagogical overview of speculative fiction, and that is what this resource provides. Teachers who have previously taught speculative fiction may also benefit from the selection of alternative texts presented here. This resource includes an argument for the consideration of more speculative fiction in college English classes, whether in composition, literature, or creative writing, as well as overviews of the main theoretical discussions and definitions of each genre.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar System Exploration: a Vision for the Next Hundred Years
    IAC-04-IAA.3.8.1.02 SOLAR SYSTEM EXPLORATION: A VISION FOR THE NEXT HUNDRED YEARS R. L. McNutt, Jr. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, Maryland, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT The current challenge of space travel is multi-tiered. It includes continuing the robotic assay of the solar system while pressing the human frontier beyond cislunar space, with Mars as an ob- vious destination. The primary challenge is propulsion. For human voyages beyond Mars (and perhaps to Mars), the refinement of nuclear fission as a power source and propulsive means will likely set the limits to optimal deep space propulsion for the foreseeable future. Costs, driven largely by access to space, continue to stall significant advances for both manned and unmanned missions. While there continues to be a hope that commercialization will lead to lower launch costs, the needed technology, initial capital investments, and markets have con- tinued to fail to materialize. Hence, initial development in deep space will likely remain govern- ment sponsored and driven by scientific goals linked to national prestige and perceived security issues. Against this backdrop, we consider linkage of scientific goals, current efforts, expecta- tions, current technical capabilities, and requirements for the detailed exploration of the solar system and consolidation of off-Earth outposts. Over the next century, distances of 50 AU could be reached by human crews but only if resources are brought to bear by international consortia. INTRODUCTION years hence, if that much3, usually – and rightly – that policy goals and technologies "Where there is no vision the people perish.” will change so radically on longer time scales – Proverbs, 29:181 that further extrapolation must be relegated to the realm of science fiction – or fantasy.
    [Show full text]
  • Deuterium – Tritium Pulse Propulsion with Hydrogen As Propellant and the Entire Space-Craft As a Gigavolt Capacitor for Ignition
    Deuterium – Tritium pulse propulsion with hydrogen as propellant and the entire space-craft as a gigavolt capacitor for ignition. By F. Winterberg University of Nevada, Reno Abstract A deuterium-tritium (DT) nuclear pulse propulsion concept for fast interplanetary transport is proposed utilizing almost all the energy for thrust and without the need for a large radiator: 1. By letting the thermonuclear micro-explosion take place in the center of a liquid hydrogen sphere with the radius of the sphere large enough to slow down and absorb the neutrons of the DT fusion reaction, heating the hydrogen to a fully ionized plasma at a temperature of ~ 105 K. 2. By using the entire spacecraft as a magnetically insulated gigavolt capacitor, igniting the DT micro-explosion with an intense GeV ion beam discharging the gigavolt capacitor, possible if the space craft has the topology of a torus. 1. Introduction The idea to use the 80% of the neutron energy released in the DT fusion reaction for nuclear micro-bomb rocket propulsion, by surrounding the micro-explosion with a thick layer of liquid hydrogen heated up to 105 K thereby becoming part of the exhaust, was first proposed by the author in 1971 [1]. Unlike the Orion pusher plate concept, the fire ball of the fully ionized hydrogen plasma can here be reflected by a magnetic mirror. The 80% of the energy released into 14MeV neutrons cannot be reflected by a magnetic mirror for thermonuclear micro-bomb propulsion. This was the reason why for the Project Daedalus interstellar probe study of the British Interplanetary Society [2], the neutron poor deuterium-helium 3 (DHe3) reaction was chosen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ringworld 01 Ringworld Larry Niven CHAPTER 1 Louis Wu
    Ringworld 01 Ringworld Larry Niven CHAPTER 1 Louis Wu In the nighttime heart of Beirut, in one of a row of general-address transfer booths, Louis Wu flicked into reality. His foot-length queue was as white and shiny as artificial snow. His skin and depilated scalp were chrome yellow; the irises of his eyes were gold; his robe was royal blue with a golden steroptic dragon superimposed. In the instant he appeared, he was smiling widely, showing pearly, perfect, perfectly standard teeth. Smiling and waving. But the smile was already fading, and in a moment it was gone, and the sag of his face was like a rubber mask melting. Louis Wu showed his age. For a few moments, he watched Beirut stream past him: the people flickering into the booths from unknown places; the crowds flowing past him on foot, now that the slidewalks had been turned off for the night. Then the clocks began to strike twenty-three. Louis Wu straightened his shoulders and stepped out to join the world. In Resht, where his party was still going full blast, it was already the morning after his birthday. Here in Beirut it was an hour earlier. In a balmy outdoor restaurant Louis bought rounds of raki and encouraged the singing of songs in Arabic and Interworld. He left before midnight for Budapest. Had they realized yet that he had walked out on his own party? They would assume that a woman had gone with him, that he would be back in a couple of hours. But Louis Wu had gone alone, jumping ahead of the midnight line, hotly pursued by the new day.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstellar Travel Or Even 1.3 Mlbs at Launch
    Terraforming Mars: By Aliens? Astronomy 330 •! Sometime movies are full of errors. •! But what can you do? Music: Rocket Man– Elton John Online ICES Question •! ICES forms are available online, so far 39/100 Are you going to fill out an ICES form before the students have completed it. deadline? •! I appreciate you filling them out! •! Please make sure to leave written comments. I a)! Yes, I did it already. find these comments the most useful, and typically b)! Yes, sometime today that’s where I make the most changes to the c)! Yes, this weekend course. d)! Yes, I promise to do it before the deadline of May6th! e)! No, I am way too lazy to spend 5 mins to help you or future students out. Final Final •! In this classroom, Fri, May 7th, 0800-1100. •! A normal-sized sheet of paper with notes on both •! Will consist of sides is allowed. –! 15 question on Exam 1 material. •! Exam 1and 2 and last year’s final are posted on –! 15 question on Exam 2 material. class website (not Compass). –! 30 questions from new material (Lect 20+). –! +4 extra credit questions •! I will post a review sheet Friday. •! A total of 105 points, i.e. 5 points of extra credit. •! Final Exam grade is based on all three sections. •! If Section 1/2 grade is higher than Exam 1/2 grade, then it will replace your Exam 1/2 grade. Final Papers Outline •! Final papers due at BEGINNING of discussion •! Rockets: how to get the most bang for the buck.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Propulsion.Pdf
    Deep Space Propulsion K.F. Long Deep Space Propulsion A Roadmap to Interstellar Flight K.F. Long Bsc, Msc, CPhys Vice President (Europe), Icarus Interstellar Fellow British Interplanetary Society Berkshire, UK ISBN 978-1-4614-0606-8 e-ISBN 978-1-4614-0607-5 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0607-5 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2011937235 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) This book is dedicated to three people who have had the biggest influence on my life. My wife Gemma Long for your continued love and companionship; my mentor Jonathan Brooks for your guidance and wisdom; my hero Sir Arthur C. Clarke for your inspirational vision – for Rama, 2001, and the books you leave behind. Foreword We live in a time of troubles.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Vision for Fusion Energy Research: Fusion Rocket Engines for Planetary Defense Abstract We Argue That It Is Essential Fo
    LA-UR-15-23198 A New Vision for Fusion Energy Research: Fusion Rocket Engines for Planetary Defense G. A. Wurden1, T. E. Weber1, P. J. Turchi2, P. B. Parks3, T. E. Evans3, S. A. Cohen4, J. T. Cassibry5, E. M. Campbell6 1Los Alamos National Laboratory 2Santa Fe, NM 3General Atomics 4Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 5University of Alabama, Huntsville 6Sandia National Laboratory Abstract We argue that it is essential for the fusion energy program to identify an imagination- capturing critical mission by developing a unique product which could command the marketplace. We lay out the logic that this product is a fusion rocket engine, to enable a rapid response capable of deflecting an incoming comet, to prevent its impact on the planet Earth, in defense of our population, infrastructure, and civilization. As a side benefit, deep space solar system exploration, with greater speed and orders-of-magnitude greater payload mass would also be possible. The US Department of Energy’s magnetic fusion research program, based in its Office of Science, focuses on plasma and fusion science1 to support the long term goal of environmentally friendly, socially acceptable, and economically viable electricity production from fusion reactors.2 For several decades the US magnetic fusion program has had to deal with a lack of urgency towards and inconsistent funding for this ambitious goal. In many American circles, fusion isn’t even at the table3 when it comes to discussing future energy production. Is there another, more urgent, unique, and even more important application for fusion? Fusion’s unique application As an on-board power source and thruster for fast propulsion in space,4 a fusion reactor would provide unparalleled performance (high specific impulse and high specific power) for a spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Interstellar Travel the Challenge of Interstellar Travel
    The challenge of interstellar travel The challenge of interstellar travel ! Interstellar travel - travel between star systems - presents one overarching challenge: ! The distances between stars are enormous compared with the distances which our current spacecraft have travelled ! Voyager I is the most distant spacecraft, and is just over 100 AU from the Earth ! The closest star system (Alpha Centauri) is 270,000 AU away! ! Also, the speed of light imposes a strict upper limit to how fast a spacecraft can travel (300,000 km/s) ! in reality, only light can travel this fast How long does it take to travel to Alpha Centauri? Propulsion Ion drive Chemical rockets Chemical Nuclear drive Solar sail F = ma ! Newton’s third law. ! Force = mass x acceleration. ! You bring the mass, your engine provides the force, acceleration is the result The constant acceleration case - plus its problems ! Let’s take the case of Alpha Centauri. ! You are provided with an ion thruster. ! You are told that it provides a constant 1g of acceleration. ! Therefore, you keep accelerating until you reach the half way point before reversing the engine and decelerating the rest of the way - coming to a stop at Alpha Cen. ! Sounds easy? Relativity and nature’s speed limit ! What does it take to maintain 1g of accelaration? ! At low velocities compared to light to accelerate a 1000kg spacecraft at 1g (10ms-2) requires 10,000 N of force. ! However, as the velocity of the spacecraft approaches the velocity of light relativity starts to kick in. ! The relativistic mass can be written as γ x mass, where γ is the relativistic Lorentz factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion Rockets for Planetary Defense
    | Los Alamos National Laboratory | Fusion Rockets for Planetary Defense Glen Wurden Los Alamos National Laboratory PPPL Colloquium March 16, 2016 LA-UR-16-21396 LA-UR-15-xxxx UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA | Los Alamos National Laboratory | My collaborators on this topic: T. E. Weber1, P. J. Turchi2, P. B. Parks3, T. E. Evans3, S. A. Cohen4, J. T. Cassibry5, E. M. Campbell6 . 1Los Alamos National Laboratory . 2Santa Fe, NM . 3General Atomics . 4Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory . 5University of Alabama, Huntsville . 6LLE, University of Rochester, Rochester Wurden et al., Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 35, 1, 123 (2016) UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA | Los Alamos National Laboratory | How many ways is electricity made today? Primary Energy Source Nominally CO2 Free Current capacity (%) Expected Lifetime (yrs) Natural Gas no 100 Coal no 80.6 400 Oil no < 50 Biomass neutral 11.4 > 400 Wind yes 0.5 > 1000 Solar photovoltaic yes 0.06 > 1000 Solar thermal yes 0.17 > 1000 Hydro yes 3.3 > 1000 Wave/Tidal yes 0.001 > 1000 Geothermal yes 0.12 > 1000 Nuclear fission yes 2.7 > 400 [i] REN21–Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century Renewables 2012–Global Status Report, 2012, http://www.map.ren21.net/GSR/GSR2012.pdf , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_development UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA | Los Alamos National Laboratory | What is the most important product that fusion could deliver? .
    [Show full text]