World ships: Feasibility and Rationale Andreas Makoto Hein∗1, Cameron Smith2, Fred´ eric´ Marin3, and Kai Staats4 1Initiative for Interstellar Studies, 27-29 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1SZ, United Kingdom 2Department of Anthropology, Portland State University Portland, OR, 97207, USA 3Universite´ de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, F-67000 Strasbourg, France 4Arizona State University Interplanetary Initiative, Phoenix, Arizona, USA Abstract ing its economic feasibility beyond the year 2300, and the development of a maintenance World ships are hypothetical, large, self- system capable of detecting, replacing, and re- contained spacecraft for crewed interstellar pairing several components per second. The travel, taking centuries to reach other stars. emergence of alternative, less costly modes of Due to their crewed nature, size, and long trip crewed interstellar travel at an earlier point in times, the feasibility of world ships faces an time might render world ships obsolete. additional set of challenges compared to in- terstellar probes. Despite their emergence in the 1980s, most of these topics remain unex- 1 Introduction plored. This article revisits some of the key feasibility issues of world ships. First, defi- World ships are hypothetical large, self- nitions of world ships from the literature are contained, self-sufficient crewed spacecraft revisited and the notion of world ship posi- for interstellar travel. Large, artificial habi- tioned with respect to similar concepts such tats appeared in the literature as early as 1929 as generation ships. Second, the key question in Bernal’s ”The World, the Flesh and the of population size is revisited in light of re- Devil” [13]. However, the notion was exten- cent results from the literature. Third, socio- sively discussed for the first time in a spe- technical and economic feasibility issues are cial issue of the Journal of the British Inter- evaluated. Finally, world ships are compared planetary Society (BIS) in 1984. Martin [56] to potential alternative modes of crewed inter- characterizes a world ship as a large, lumber- arXiv:2005.04100v2 [physics.pop-ph] 12 May 2020 stellar travel. Key roadblocks for world ships ing vehicle, moving at a fraction of a per cent are the considerable resources required, shift- of the speed of light and taking millennia to complete a journey between stars. Martin [56] ∗Corresponding author. E-mail: an- presents a rationale for world ships, cost es- [email protected] timates, and how scenarios for their construc- 1 Table 1: Crewed starship categories with respect to cruise velocity and population size. Population size Cruise velocity < 1000 < 100,000 > 100,000 [%c] > 10 Sprinter Colony ship - < 10 Slow boat Colony ship World ship < 1 - Colony ship World ship Figure 1: Concept map for crewed interstellar starships. tion and colonization might look like. In the there is no fundamental technical, economic, special issue, Bond and Martin [15] present or social reason which would prohibit the con- an analysis of engineering feasibility, includ- struction of world ships. However, due to their ing two types of world ships, each with a dif- mass on the order of billions of tons, their con- ferent (land or sea-based) environment for its struction is estimated to take place several cen- crew to live in. Grant [33] goes on to analyze turies in the future [56], when humanity would the stability of isolated world ship populations have control over solar system resources. and fleets, and Smith [70] provides scenarios Apart from world ships, Finney and Jones for how life on a world ship might look like. [27] and Kondo [48] have explored in their Finally, Holmes [43] provides a sociological edited volumes the idea of generation ships in perspective on world ships and how isolated general, with contributions covering technical, communities could be sustained over millen- cultural, and social aspects. nia. The special issue’s articles conclude that In 2011, a World Ship Symposium was or- 2 ganized by the BIS, resulting in another world lation sizes are again obtained [53, 55, 54]. ship JBIS special issue in 2012, including con- Apart from population size estimations, tributions dealing with the shift from a plane- world ships have been treated in dedicated tary to a space-based civilization [5, 6], financ- workshop tracks at the Tennessee Valley Inter- ing such projects [17], and propulsion systems stellar Workshop (TVIW) in 2016 and 2017, [57]. Notably, Hein et al. Ceyssens et al. emphasizing ecological engineering issues of [17] analyzed how a world ship project might world ships [18]. Furthermore, in 2015, a be funded and proposes a long-term invest- student team at the International Space Uni- ment approach in which funds are accumu- versity (ISU) has developed the ”Astra Plan- lated over centuries. Hein et al. [38] provide a eta” concept for a world ship, covering a wide reassessment of world ship feasibility, taking range of topics, such as technical, legal, soci- additional aspects such as knowledge trans- etal aspects, as well as governance and financ- fer and reliability into account. Furthermore, ing [2]. a fundamental trade-off between trip duration This paper provides an updated overview of and population size is hypothesized, as longer research on world ships. It covers some cru- trip durations require a larger population num- cial topics such as how to define world ships, ber for sustaining the required skillset. From population size, socio-technical and economic a reliability perspective, it is concluded that feasibility, and how world ships might fit into an extremely complex technical system such the broader landscape of crewed interstellar as a world ship would require a sophisticated travel concepts. maintenance system, as the number of compo- nents that would need to be replaced, repaired, or both amounts to several per second. 2 Revisiting definitions Some of the team members who worked on this paper subsequently founded Project An attempt to distinguish between different Hyperion in the context of Icarus Interstel- concepts for crewed interstellar travel was pro- lar. Within Project Hyperion, Smith [71] pub- vided in Hein et al. [38]. The distinction is lished a seminal article on the required popula- made based on two dimensions: cruise veloc- tion size for a world ship for trip times of sev- ity and population size. Crewed starships with eral centuries. He concludes that a population populations below 1000 and a velocity higher size that takes genetic drift and catastrophic than 10% of the speed of light are called events into account would comprise several “sprinter”, slower starships with a similar crew tens of thousands of people. The paper re- size “slow boat” and starships with a popu- ceived a lot of attention, in particular, as it con- lation size below 100,000 are called “colony tradicts previous population estimates, which ship”. World ships are defined as crewed star- were much lower, such as just a few crew ships with populations over 100,000 and a ve- members in Finney and Jones [27]. It also locity below 10% of the speed of light. As confirms that longer trip times correlate with a result, we get the following three criteria, larger population sizes. More recently, a team adapted from [38]: lead by Marin presented a further analysis of population size, in which much smaller popu- • Self-sufficiency: thousands of years 3 • Population size: > 100,000 and a given population size. ”World” com- monly denominates Earth with all life and hu- • Cruise velocity: < 1%c man civilization. If this is what we mean by ”world” in ”world ship,” any spacecraft An overview of these concepts is shown in with a closed habitat containing life and a hu- Table 1 and Fig. 1. Fig. 1, in particular, man civilization could be called ”world ship.” shows a concept map for crewed interstellar However, this interpretation of ”world” has spacecraft from Hein et al. [38]. It can be the connotation of a habitat with an enormous seen that all four concepts of crewed starships size. We can even imagine a habitat the size (sprinter, slow boat, colony ship, world ship) of a planet, along with the living conditions are generation ships and also considered inter- on a planet. We will later present such a stellar arks. planet-sized world ship, based on the McK- There are several assumptions behind this endree Cylinder in Section 3. The etymology taxonomy and concept map. First, the popula- of ”world” allows for an alternative interpre- tion size should be taken as order of magnitude tation, where ”world” indicates a material uni- values and are somewhat arbitrary. One could verse or ontology. A ”world ship” would then draw an alternative demarcation line at one be a ship which, for humans on-board, would million between colony ships and world ships. represent ”all there is,” not only in a material Hence, it might be better to rather speak of sense (what is inside the habitat, spacecraft a fuzzy demarcation line between these con- subsystems, etc.) but also in terms of what hu- cepts. For example, in Hein et al. [38], a mans would conceive as the ”reality” in which world ship design is presented, based on sev- they live. Hence, departing from the existing eral stacked Stanford Tori. The Stanford Torus definitions in the literature, interesting new in- was imagined for population sizes of about terpretations of world ships are possible, going 10,000 to 100,000, but it can be seen that by back to the meaning of ”world.” stacking a sufficient number of Tori, a popula- tion of 100,000 to one million can be accom- modated without fundamentally changing the 3 World ship designs nature of the spacecraft. Second, the veloc- ity range of world ships is larger than in Mar- World ships designs are usually dominated by tin [56], extending velocities to below 0.1c, as a large habitat section and a comparatively there is no physical or engineering reason why small propulsion section.