DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee SANCTIONS AND ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING BILL [LORDS] First Sitting Tuesday 27 February 2018 (Morning) CONTENTS Programme motion agreed to. Written evidence (Reporting to the House) motion agreed to. CLAUSES 2 TO 5 agreed to. SCHEDULE 1 agreed to. CLAUSES 6 TO 16 agreed to. CLAUSE 17, as amended, under consideration when the Committee adjourned till this day at Two o’clock. PBC (Bill 157) 2017 - 2019 No proofs can be supplied. Corrections that Members suggest for the final version of the report should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 3 March 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1 Public Bill Committee 27 FEBRUARY 2018 Sanctions and Anti-Money 2 Laundering Bill [Lords] The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: DAME CHERYL GILLAN,†STEVE MCCABE † Badenoch, Mrs Kemi (Saffron Walden) (Con) Graham, Luke (Ochil and South Perthshire) (Con) Bardell, Hannah (Livingston) (SNP) † Maclean, Rachel (Redditch) (Con) † Benyon, Richard (Newbury) (Con) † Norris, Alex (Nottingham North) (Lab/Co-op) † Chalk, Alex (Cheltenham) (Con) † Prentis, Victoria (Banbury) (Con) † Courts, Robert (Witney) (Con) † Rowley, Danielle (Midlothian) (Lab) † Dodds, Anneliese (Oxford East) (Lab/Co-op) † Smith, Nick (Blaenau Gwent) (Lab) † Duffield, Rosie (Canterbury) (Lab) Stevens, Jo (Cardiff Central) (Lab) † Duncan, Sir Alan (Minister for Europe and the † Thewliss, Alison (Glasgow Central) (SNP) Americas) † Freer, Mike (Finchley and Golders Green) (Con) Mike Everett, Committee Clerk † Glen, John (Economic Secretary to the Treasury) † Goodman, Helen (Bishop Auckland) (Lab) † attended the Committee 3 Public Bill Committee HOUSE OF COMMONS Sanctions and Anti-Money 4 Laundering Bill [Lords] Other Members remain free to catch my eye to speak on Public Bill Committee all or any of the amendments within that group. A Member may speak more than once in a single debate. Tuesday 27 February 2018 At the end of a debate on a group of amendments, I shall call the Member who moved the leading amendment again. Before they sit down, they will need to indicate if (Morning) they wish to withdraw the amendment or to seek a decision. If any Member wishes to press any other [STEVE MCCABE in the Chair] amendment or new clause in a group to a vote, they need to let me know. I shall work on the assumption Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill that the Minister wishes the Committee to reach a Lords decision on all Government amendments, if any are [ ] tabled. 9.25 am Please note that decisions on amendments do not take place in the order they are debated but in the order The Chair: Before we begin, can I ask everyone to they appear on the amendment paper. In other words, ensure that all electronic devices are turned off or debate proceeds according to the selection and grouping switched to silent mode? I remind Committee members list; decisions are taken when we come to the clause that that Mr Speaker says that teas and coffees are not the amendment affects. I will use my discretion to allowed during sittings. Today, we will consider first the decide whether to allow a separate stand part debate on programme motion on the amendment paper, then a individual clauses and schedules, following the debate motion to enable the reporting of written evidence for on the relevant amendments. I hope that explanation is publication. helpful. The Committee has just agreed a programme motion The Minister for Europe and the Americas (Sir Alan that will be reproduced in the amendment paper for Duncan): I beg to move, tomorrow. The programme motion sets out the order in That— which we have to consider the Bill. (1) the Committee shall (in addition to its first meeting at 9.25 Clauses 2 to 5 ordered to stand part of the Bill. am on Tuesday 27 February) meet— (a) at 2.00 pm on Tuesday 27 February; Schedule 1 (b) at 11.30 am and 2.00 pm on Thursday 1 March; (c) at 9.25 am and 2.00 pm on Tuesday 6 March; TRADE SANCTIONS (2) the proceedings shall be taken in the following order: Clauses 2 to 5 Schedule 1; Clauses 6 to 18; Clause 1; Clauses 19 to 43; Schedule 2; Clauses 44 to 50; Schedule 3; Clauses 51 to 56; Helen Goodman (Bishop Auckland) (Lab): I beg to new Clauses; new Schedules; remaining proceedings on the Bill. move amendment 29, in schedule 1, page 49, leave out (3) the proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) lines 39 and 40. be brought to a conclusion at 5.00 pm on Tuesday 6 March. May I take this opportunity to welcome you to the The Chair: With this it will be convenient to discuss Chair, Mr McCabe, and say what a pleasure it is to serve the following: under your chairmanship? Because the Bill in its principles Amendment 30, in schedule 1, page 50, leave out lines enjoys cross-party support, in the spirit of what I believe 2 and 3. is cross-party agreement I am happy to offer to any Amendment 31, in schedule 1, page 50, leave out member of the Committee the services of my officials, paragraph 33. should they want any briefing or advice on any detail of the Bill. Helen Goodman: May I say what a pleasure it is to see Question put and agreed to. you in the Chair on this bright and sunny, if cold, morning, Mr McCabe? I will not press the amendments, The Chair: The deadline for amendments to be considered as they are simply a vehicle enabling me to ask a during the first two line-by-line sitting days of the Bill question: on trade sanctions, is there a loophole in has passed. The deadline for amendments to be considered relation to the Isle of Man? on the third line-by-line sitting day is the rise of the House on Thursday. Sir Alan Duncan: I thank the hon. Lady for her Resolved, question. It is never unhelpful to be able to clarify a That, subject to the discretion of the Chair, any written evidence point of detail of this sort, and I hope I can now do that received by the Committee shall be reported to the House for to her satisfaction. publication.—(Sir Alan Duncan.) Amendments 29 to 31 would cause the Bill to deviate from the established practice in export controls and The Chair: We now begin line-by-line consideration customs matters where transfers of goods to the Isle of of the Bill. The selection list for today is available in the Man are not classified as exports and imports. The Isle room and on the Bill webpage. This shows how selected of Man is part of a joint customs and indirect tax area amendments have been grouped together for debate. within the United Kingdom, and across all customs Amendments grouped together are generally on the matters goods transferred to the Isle of Man are not same or a similar issue. A Member who has put their said to be exported from the United Kingdom, and name to the lead amendment in a group is called first. goods transferred from the Isle of Man are not said to 5 Public Bill Committee 27 FEBRUARY 2018 Sanctions and Anti-Money 6 Laundering Bill [Lords] be imported into the United Kingdom. That is a long- Amendment 17, in clause 7, page 7, line 36, at end standing customs arrangement and has been reflected insert “, in legislation as well as in custom and practice. unless the ship belongs to a person or the ship provides legitimate The Isle of Man is integrated into HM Revenue and travel to a person, recognised as a refugee under the UN Convention Customs’ CHIEF—customs handling of import and Relating to the Status of Refugees.” export of freight—computer system, which enables it to This amendment would mean that shipping sanctions could not be operate UK customs. The Isle of Man mirrors UK imposed on ships belonging to, or carrying, a recognised refugee. export control and sanctions legislation and makes licensing decisions on exactly the same basis as the UK. Helen Goodman: The amendments are rightly grouped The amendment, if it were carried, would put sanctions together, because they deal with essentially the same policy out of step with export control and customs. issue. Many refugees are coming to Europe at the moment, Only goods covered by sanctions legislation would be mainly by sea, but a small number by aircraft. We want affected by this change and would in essence be subject a system that has firm sanctions on shipping and aircraft to the same export controls twice. If a good were but does not penalise or criminalise refugees. I know the travelling to a sanctioned destination, via the Isle of Minister is as keen as I am to achieve that. Man under a licence, it would require one licence from The numbers are striking: more than 1 million refugees the UK and another from the Isle of Man. The amendment or migrants reached Europe by sea in 2016, and 1 would cause procedural and legal difficulties and increase million arrived in that way last year. Most of them are administrative burdens for business and Her Majesty’s fleeing conflict and political persecution in three places: Government, and all for no observable benefit Syria, Afghanistan and Africa.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helen Goodman MP
    Tradition and Change: Four People A Response to the Politics of Paradox By Helen Goodman MP June 2011 Contents Foreword The Reeve’s Tale The Miner’s Tale Looking Back The Mother’s Tale The Priest’s Tale Looking Forward Foreword The Politics of Paradox (POP) is a collection of essays written by proponents of Blue Labour with responses based on a series of seminars. Blue Labour’s thesis is that having lost the election, we need a thorough re-examination of our ideas and a return to concepts and practices prevalent at the founding of the party. Maurice Glasman – the lead editor - has been involved in the ground breaking London Citizen’s movement for the living wage. His central argument is that we need to return to the community based practices of the late 19th century Labour movement and that if we do we shall effect change in people’s lives building solidarity and reciprocity which has a real meaning and value to them, far greater than the abstract philosophical principles of equality and justice. This approach strikes a real note of relevance, because many people feel their lives are insecure and that social ties and obligations have been undermined by globalisation. Sometimes the state institutions set up to tackle problems descend into bossiness and bureaucracy, leaving people feeling frustrated and powerless. I want to begin my response with two stories about communities in my constituency. The first impression might be that these are very traditional and would benefit from the Blue Labour approach. But if we look more deeply, it becomes clear that while voluntarism and co-operation have a part to play – the forces and structures in the modern world require far more than this for them to flourish.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Signs Why Anwyn Chose to Learn British Sign Language Aged 14
    11 30 46 Mum Lisa Radio aid Deaf role on daughter’s myth busting models in the moderate world of work deafness Spring 2017 Issue 44 New articles inside! I feel strongly that BSL is important for Anwyn’s confidence and identity. Reading the signs Why Anwyn chose to learn British Sign Language aged 14 Towards a world without barriers www.ndcs.org.uk School for Deaf Children 5-16 years Hamilton Lodge offers a full curriculum to deaf children aged 5-16 years in our school. We take a “child-centred communication” approach at Hamilton Lodge and we support the development of both English and British Sign Language. We focus our curriculum development on courses and accreditations that match the needs of individual pupils. We offer a range of GCSE, Entry Level, Functional Skills, Pathways, Unit Award courses and Signature sign language qualifications. We have a well-established Work Experience Programme and Duke of Edinburgh Award Scheme, both of which focus on individuals being able to build their independence skills, confidence and self-esteem. Further Education for Deaf New Specialist Provision for Deaf Young People 16 -19 years Children with Complex Needs Hamilton Lodge College provides the right stepping stone into In 2016, Hamilton Lodge opened this provision to ensure an independent and successful adult life. Based in the heart of that deaf pupils with more complex needs could access our a vibrant city, our college students are supported to make the education. most of the city’s facilities. With support some pupils are able to transition to our core We provide FE places in partnership with City College Brighton provision but some require a different curriculum and care & Hove, Plumpton College, and St John’s College.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday 8 February 2017 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
    1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Wednesday 8 February 2017 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS EUROPEAN UNION (NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL) BILL [THIRD DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote. Negatived: rejected without a vote. Negatived on division: rejected following a vote. Not called: debated in a group of amendments, but not put to a decision. Not moved: not debated or put to a decision. Question proposed: debate underway but not concluded. Withdrawn after debate: moved and debated but then withdrawn, so not put to a decision. Not selected: not chosen for debate by the Chair. NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO THE PRIORITIES IN NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM’S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION; CLAUSES 1 AND 2; REMAINING NEW CLAUSES; REMAINING NEW SCHEDULES; REMAINING PROCEEDINGS IN COMMITTEE NEW CLAUSES AND NEW SCHEDULES RELATING TO THE PRIORITIES IN NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE UNITED KINGDOM’S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION Jeremy Corbyn Mr Nicholas Brown Keir Starmer Paul Blomfield Jenny Chapman 2 Committee of the whole House Proceedings: 8 February 2017 European Union (Notice of Withdrawal) Bill, continued Matthew Pennycook Mr Graham Allen Ian Murray Ann Clwyd Valerie Vaz Heidi Alexander Stephen Timms Mike Gapes Liz Kendall Mr Ben Bradshaw Mrs Madeleine Moon Angela Smith Stephen Doughty Owen Smith Sarah Champion Mr Clive Betts Helen Goodman Seema
    [Show full text]
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely
    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
    [Show full text]
  • Core Group Core Group Plus Neutral but Not Hostile
    CORE GROUP NEUTRAL BUT CORE GROUP HOSTILE CORE GROUP PLUS NOT HOSTILE NEGATIVE GROUP Andy Alan Andy Slaughter Alan Whitehead Alan Johnon McDonald Campbell Catherine Alison Angela Rayner Adrian Bailey Alan Meale Smith McGovern Dennis Alex Andrew Gwynne Angela Smith Ann Coffey Skinner Cunningham Barry Diane Abbott Albert Owen Andy Burnham Anna Turley Sheerman Grahame Catherine West Andrew Smith Ed Miliband Caroline Flint Morris Margaret Ian Lavery Angela Eagle Ben Bradshaw Chris Evans Greenwood Bridget Ian Mearns Carolyn Harris Ann Clwyd Chris Leslie Phillipson Imran Chinyelu Chuka Barbara Keeley Diana Johnson Hussain Onwurah Umunna Jeremy Daniel Elizabeth Christina Rees Barry Gardiner Corbyn Zeichner Kendall John Emma Dave Anderson Bill Esterson Dan Jarvis McDonnell Reynolds Catherin Fiona Jon Trickett Dawn Butler Derek Twigg McKinnell Mactaggart Graham Kate Osamor David Winnick Chris Bryant Frank Field Jones Kelvin Debbie Gareth Harriet Chris Matheson Hopkins Abrahams Thomas Harman RIP Michael Emily George Clive Betts Ian Austin Meacher Thornberry Howarth Rebecca Emma Lewell- Geoffrey Clive Efford Ivan Lewis Long-Bailer Buck Robinson Ronnie Gloria de Vicky Foxcroft Colleen Fletcher Jamie Reed Campbell Piero Richard John Harry Harpham David Crausby Graham Allen Burgon Woodcock Luciana Clive Lewis Helen Goodman David Hanson Hilary Benn Berger Rachael Holly Lynch Derek Twigg Ian Murray Margaret Maskell Hodge Ian Lucas Gavin Shuker Jo Cox Mark Tami Jenny Jo Stevens Geraint Davies Mary Creagh Chapman Kate Hollern Gerald Jones Joan Ryan Melanie
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure
    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stalemate by Design? How Binary Voting Caused the Brexit Impasse of 2019
    Munich Social Science Review, New Series, vol. 3 (2020) Stalemate by Design? How Binary Voting Caused the Brexit Impasse of 2019 G. M. Peter Swann Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham NG8 1BB, United Kingdom, [email protected] Abstract: Between January and April, 2019, the UK parliament voted on the Prime Minister’s proposed Brexit deal, and also held a series of indicative votes on eight other Brexit options. There was no majority support in any of the votes for the Prime Minister’s deal, nor indeed for any of the other options. This outcome led to a prolonged period of political stalemate, which many people considered to be the fault of the Prime Minister, and her resignation became inevitable. Controversially, perhaps, I shall argue that the fault did not lie with the Prime Minster, but with Parliament’s stubborn insistence on using its default binary approach to voting. The outcome could have been quite different if Parliament had been willing to embrace the most modest of innovations: a voting system such as the single transferable vote, or multi-round exhaustive votes, which would be guaranteed to produce a ‘winner’. Keywords: Brexit, Parliament, Binary Votes, Indicative Votes, Single Transferable Vote, Exhaustive Votes 1. Introduction This paper considers the impasse in the Brexit process that developed from the start of 2019. I argue that an important factor in the emergence of this impasse was the use of binary voting – the default method of voting in the Westminster Parliament. I shall argue that alternative voting processes would have had a much greater chance of success.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE of PUBLIC ACCOUNTS Briefing for Posts & Hosts Visit To
    Finansudvalget FIU alm. del - Bilag 146 Offentligt COMMITTEE OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS www.parliament.uk/pac [email protected] Briefing for posts & hosts Visit to Copenhagen and Stockholm 20-24 May 2007 Membership of the Committee of Public Accounts The Committee consists of sixteen members, of whom a quorum is four. The members are nominated at the beginning of each Parliament (before December 1974, Members were nominated at the beginning of each Session) on the basis of a motion made by a Government minister, after consultation with the Opposition. Changes in membership are made from time to time during the Parliament, often because Members have become Ministers or front-bench opposition spokesmen. The party proportions of the Committee, like other committees, are the same as in the House, and at present this gives 9 Labour members, 5 Conservative members, and 2 minority party members (at present from the Liberal Democrats). One of the members is the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, who does not normally attend (Rt Hon John Healey MP). The Committee chooses its own chairman, traditionally an Opposition member, usually with previous experience as a Treasury minister. Divisions in the Committee are very rare, generally occurring less than once a year. The current membership of the Committee is as follows: Mr Edward Leigh MP (Chairman) (Conservative, Gainsborough) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and Poole North Mr Greg Clarke MP (Conservative, Tunbridge Wells) Rt Hon David
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Backs Archbishop's Concerns
    Labour backs Archbishop’s concerns Ed Miliband says Rowan Williams “right” to speak out about of Government reforms Ed Miliband, the Leader of the Labour Party, has publicly welcomed concerns voiced by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, about a number of policies being pursued by the Tory-led Government. Ed said that the Archbishop‟s intervention had “raised serious and formidable questions about the morality of the Government‟s reforms.” The Archbishop‟s comments came in an article he wrote for the New Statesman in June, and provoked a widespread political debate. Dr Williams expressed his fears that the Conservatives‟ “Big Society” agenda could become a political cover for government cuts. © Tim Ashley He wrote, “The widespread suspicion that this has assurances that poorer families would not suffer been done for opportunistic or money-saving reasons disproportionately. allows many to dismiss what there is of a programme for „big society‟ initiatives; even the term has fast Labour‟s leader, Ed Miliband, rejected the argument become painfully stale.” that church leaders should stay out of politics. “Britain‟s churches are at the forefront of many Dr Williams also identified the “bafflement and communities, and they will be among the first to see indignation” felt by many towards flagship government the consequences of government policies. Where policies, such as its education reforms and its they believe the Government has failed to stand up for reorganisation of the National Health Service. the most vulnerable, it is quite
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Communication Research and Politics Title: Across the Great
    Communication Research and Politics Title: Across the Great Divide: Gender, Twitter and Election in the United Kingdom and New Zealand Authors: Susan Fountaine (Massey University), Karen Ross (Newcastle University) and Margie Comrie (Massey University) Paper accepted on 11.12.2018 – DOI: 10.1080/22041451.2018.1558774 1 Abstract Politicians’ use of Twitter has been well documented over the past decade but few studies have incorporated an explicitly comparative dimension. To explore how political and social context impacts upon tweet content, we analysed the substance and tone of 400 tweets from women MPs during the United Kingdom 2015 and New Zealand 2014 general election campaigns. Across our study, web links, visuals, and references to own campaign were common, though with some notable inter-party differences. A neutral tone prevailed, with positivity more present than negativity. NZ women MPs, particularly from the centre-right, demonstrated a broadcast and highly managed approach to Twitter. UK MPs were more interactive with both citizens and other MPs, shared more personal content, and largely ignored the media agenda. These comparative findings at least partly map onto the concentrated and diffuse personalisation approaches within the equalisation versus normalisation framework of social media. We conclude that region, party, and culture all play a role in the Twitter story, and are deserving of further scrutiny from political communication scholars. Keywords Twitter, women politicians, gender, comparative research, equalisation versus normalisation Social media platform Twitter launched in 2006, with politicians among the early adopters of the micro-blogging technology, particularly in Europe and the United States (Graham, Broersma, Hazelhoff & van’t Haar, 2013; Hawthorne, Houston & McKinney, 2013; Vergeer, 2015).
    [Show full text]