DOCSLIB.ORG

Voice and Choice: Opening the Door to Environmental Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voice and Choice: Opening the Door to Environmental Democracy Voice and Choice: Opening the Door to Environmental Democracy Joseph Foti with Lalanath de Silva, Heather McGray, Linda Shaffer, Jonathan Talbot, and Jacob Werksman Based on the findings of The Access Initiative ii Greg Mock Editor Bob Livernash Co-editor Hyacinth Billings Publications Director April Osmanof Cover design Maggie Powell Designs Inc. Report design and layout Each World Resources Institute report represents a timely, scholarly treatment of a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study topics and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwise stated, however, all the interpretation and fi ndings set forth in WRI publications are those of the authors. Copyright © 2008 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-56973-687-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008929166 Voice and Choice: Opening the Door to Environmental Democracy Contents List of Contributing Access Initiative Partners . v Acknowledgments . vii Foreword . ix Executive Summary . x Reader’s Roadmap . .xx iii 1. OPENING ACCESS . 1 Principle 10: A World Open to Change . 2 Environmental Governance and Environmental Democracy . 3 The Elements of Access . 4 A Brief History of Environmental Access Rights . 10 Turning Rights into Practice . 13 Approach . 16 2. STRENGTHENING THE ARGUMENT FOR ACCESS . 21 Access Rights are Human Rights . 22 The Measure of Good Governance . 25 Access Generates Public Benefi ts. 26 3. ACCESS HURDLES . 39 Uneven Progress. 41 Managing Vested Interests and the Politics of Access . 42 Identifying the Gaps in Information Systems . 48 Fostering a Culture of Openness . 61 Investing in Access Capacity . 67 4. RECOMMENDATIONS . 77 Actions for Governments . 78 Actions for Access Proponents . 80 A Research Agenda to Explore Public Participation and Environmental Sustainability . 81 Sources . 83 Appendices 1. The Partnership for Principle 10 . 91 2. The Electricity Governance Initiative . 93 3. Case Studies. 95 4. The Access Initiative: A selection of outcomes from 2002–2007 . 105 5. Glossary and Abbreviations . 107 About the Authors . .112 Boxes 1.1 Text of Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration of 1992 . 2 1.2 Are Access Principles Access Rights? . 3 1.3 The Access Initiative . 3 1.4 Mexico’s Federal Institute of Access to Public Information . 7 1.5 Steady Progress on Environmental Impact Assessment in Ghana . 8 1.6 The Mehta Trend . 9 1.7 The Access Initiative Strategy . 12 1.8 Closing the Gap and Voice and Choice . 15 1.9 Access and the Private Sector . 16 1.10 The Aarhus Convention: All Principle 10, All the Time . 18 1.11 The TAI Research and Advocacy Process, Step-by-Step . 20 2.1 Chile: Using the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for the Right to Information . 22 2.2 Forms of Public Participation . 26 2.3 Uganda: Sustaining Traditional Livelihoods in Pian Upe Wildlife Reserve . 28 2.4 Realistic Expectations of Public Participation . 32 iv 2.5 Implementing Broad Legal Standing . 38 3.1 Military Waste in Bulgaria . 45 3.2 The Growth of TAI: A Case Study in Coalition-Building . 46 3.3 Mexico: Cleaner Beaches with Information and Partnership . 48 3.4 Chile: Emergency Response Falls Short on Impact . 54 3.5 Solving a Water Contamination Mystery in Washington, D.C. 57 3.6 State of the Environment, Hungary: The Importance of Usability . 61 3.7 Fighting for Access in Sri Lanka: The Southern Transport Development Project . 64 3.8 Cautious Optimism: Environmental Education in South Africa . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Earthjustice-2016-Annual-Report.Pdf
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT Our We are here MISSION BECAUSE THE EARTH NEEDS A GOOD LAWYER. Earthjustice is the premier nonprofit public interest environmental law organization. We wield the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people’s health; to preserve magnificent places and wildlife; to advance clean energy; and to combat climate change. Earthjustice attorney Tom Waldo in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest THANK YOU A Letter from Our President and Board Chair Clean air, clean water, thriving communities, a vibrant, healthy natural world—these are things that most of us hold dear. Regardless of the political party we support, we cherish our rich natural heritage and strive to make the world a better place for our children. Political winds change, but these shared values— values that drive our work here at Earthjustice—stand the test of time. These are the fights we cannot afford to lose. Thanks to your support, Earthjustice made substantial progress in fiscal year 2016. As you will read in these pages, together we won key victories in each of our programs. We protected the wild with our fight to restore wild salmon to the Columbia and Snake Rivers in the Pacific Northwest and our efforts to put the brakes on a sprawling resort complex that threatened the Grand Canyon. With our partners and allies, we made major steps toward addressing the climate crisis, blocking a massive coal strip mine in Montana and coal export facilities on the West Coast, and defeating attacks on renewable energy while winning clean energy advances across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngos: a Primer on the Evolution of the Organizations That Are Setting the Next Generation of "Regulations"
    NGOs: A Primer on the Evolution of the Organizations That Are Setting the Next Generation of “Regulations” Nongovernmental responsibility organizations Nongovernmental organizations (EHS&SR) profes- (NGOs) have been sionals who are around for more exercise a growing influence spending more and than 150 years. Over more of their time the last decade, over business on “nonregula- however, there has tory” issues driven been a subtle but by NGOs. steady shift in the nature of their influence over business. Background: NGOs as De Facto Rulemakers In essence, NGOs are beginning to act increas- The current dynamics between NGOs and the ingly like governmental regulatory agencies, issu- business world have been described in an article ing a new generation of de facto “regulations” in that we published in Corporate Environmental the form of standards, guidelines, and certifica- Strategy.1 In summary, that article presented the tions. Once gadflies and outsiders, NGOs increas- case that, until recently, it has been governments ingly are shifting to market-based approaches in that have defined corporate responsibility; com- order to effect change and gain a prominent place panies have tracked the environmental, health, at the table in stakeholder negotiations. safety, and social responsibility metrics dictated What are NGOs, and how did these organiza- by those government-defined laws and regula- tions evolve? What types of NGOs exist, and how tions. Not surprisingly, business executives have are they classified? How do they operate and wield responded to EHS&SR issues narrowly, viewing their power? And what are the critical issues they face if they want to expand their influence? This article offers a literature review of pub- Brijesh Nalinakumari lished information on NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Corporations
    PROVISIONAL EDITION Regulating Corporations A Resource Guide Désirée Abrahams* Geneva • December 2004 * Désirée Abrahams prepared this report during 2003 and early 2004, when she was a Research Assistant at the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) in Geneva, Switzerland. The author would like to thank Peter Utting, Kate Ives and Anita Tombez for their research and editorial support. The report was prepared under the UNRISD project “Promoting Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Developing Countries: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives”, which is partly funded by the MacArthur Foundation. This edition may be subject to minor modifications and copy-editing prior to formal publication. The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency engaging in multidisciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research programmes include: Civil Society and Social Movements; Democracy, Governance and Human Rights; Identities, Conflict and Cohesion; Social Policy and Development; and Technology, Business and Society. A list of the Institute’s free and priced publications can be obtained by contacting: UNRISD Reference Centre Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Tel +41 (0)22 917 3020 Fax +41 (0)22 917 0650 [email protected] www.unrisd.org Copyright © United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Commissioner Karel De Gucht European Commissioner for Trade European Commission BE-1049 Brussels May 19, 2014 Civil Society
    Commissioner Karel de Gucht European Commissioner for Trade European Commission BE-1049 Brussels May 19, 2014 Civil society call for full transparency about the EU-US trade negotiations Dear Commissioner De Gucht, The undersigned organisations are writing to express deep concerns about the lack of transparency around the ongoing trade talks on a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). We are calling on you to open the negotiation process to the public, by releasing the negotiating mandate, documents submitted by the EU, and negotiating texts. The European Commission has repeatedly stated that trade and investment between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) are already highly integrated, and that the main focus of TTIP will be to achieve regulatory convergence by removing so-called non-tariff barriers to trade. This means that the outcome has much less to do with traditional trade issues such as tariffs, than with the regulations and standards that apply in the EU and the US and that affect every single aspect of citizens’ daily lives – from the quality of the food we eat to the safety of chemicals we use, the energy we consume, or the impact of financial services on each of us. Civil society groups in the EU and in the US have voiced concerns that this might lower standards and remove safeguards across the board. They have requested greater transparency about the negotiations to address these concerns. The setting up of a stakeholder advisory group for the negotiations by the EU – although an improvement compared to previous negotiations – is far from sufficient to make the process fully transparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-American Court on Human Rights
    INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-23/17 OF NOVEMBER 15, 2017 REQUESTED BY THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA THE ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS (STATE OBLIGATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROTECTION AND GUARANTEE OF THE RIGHTS TO LIFE AND TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY: INTERPRETATION AND SCOPE OF ARTICLES 4(1) AND 5(1) IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS) the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”), composed of the following judges: Roberto F. Caldas, President Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, Vice President Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito, Judge Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, Judge, and L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire, Judge also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Articles 70 to 75 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), issues the following advisory opinion, structured as follows: - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRESENTATION OF THE REQUEST ........................................................................................ 4 II. PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COURT ...................................................................................... 6 III. JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • It's Smarter to Separate
    1. Executive Summary As communities across the United States seek ways to protect their environment, conserve raw materials and lower the cost of waste disposal, innovations that keep waste out of landfills are increasingly attractive. Even in Texas, where low costs have created one of the largest landfilling economies in the world, the case for landfill diversion is a no-brainer: every 10,000 tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) that goes to the landfill creates 1 job, while recycling the same amount of waste creates 20-100 jobs. Reuse or remanufacture from 10,000 tons of waste creates on average over 180 jobs.1 Recycling, reuse, and remanufacture also generate Leaking Landfill revenue for governments and Major River Aquifer firms that collect the materials, 2012 Data "Joint Groundwater Monitoring and Contamination Report 2012" www.tceq.texas.gov while landfilling creates potential financial and environmental liability: in Texas in 2012, 66 of nearly 200 active landfills reported they leaked toxins underground.2 Landfills also account for 18% of U.S. methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas.3 Public demands for action on climate justice, job creation and fiscal responsibility are often seen as competing interests— but waste reduction and recycling work on all accounts. However, not all landfill diversion methods result in equivalent jobs, conservation and cost efficiency. In recent years, a number of firms have proposed technologies such as refuse derived fuel (RDF), gasification and other incineration methods that environmentalists and recycling advocates find to be destructive— especially when paired with “mixed waste processing” or facilities that encourage residents to throw all trash and recycling into one bin for subsequent separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clientearth Company Limited by Guarantee Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2013
    Charity Registration No. 1053988 Company Registration No. 2863827 (England and Wales) CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013 CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Trustees S Hockman M Mclntosh W Mclntosh M Robert M Stanley The Honorable E Young P Harvey B Eno H Jones H Tinsley F Serfaty Secretary BWB Secretarial Limted Charity number 1053988 Company number 2863827 Principal address The Hothouse 274 Richmond Road London E8 3QW Registered office 2-6 Cannon Street London EC4M 6YH Auditors Arram Berlyn Gardner 30 City Road London EC1Y 2AB CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE CONTENTS Page Trustees' report Statement of trustees' responsibilities 18 Independent auditors' report 19-20 Statement of financial activities 21 Balance sheet —Group 18 Balance sheet - Parent 19 Notes to the accounts 24- 38 CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE TRUSTEES' REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013 The trustees (who are also the directors of ClientEarth for the purposes of company law) present their report and accounts for the period ended 3t December 2013. The accounts have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies set out in note t to the accounts and comply with the Companies Act 2006 and the Statement of Recommended Practice, 'Accounting and Reporting by Charities', issued in March 2005. Objectives and activities The charity's objects are: ~ To promote and encourage the enhancement, restoration, conservation and protection
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Reduce Waste Pollution and Promote Efficient Waste Materials Lifecycle Management Through Employment Programs and Recycling Infrastructure Investment
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Student Papers in Local and Global Regional Economies Economics Student Papers Spring 2021 Proposal to Reduce Waste Pollution and Promote Efficientaste W Materials Lifecycle Management through Employment Programs and Recycling Infrastructure Investment Jake Gibson Wright State University - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/ econ_student_papers_economies Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, and the Regional Economics Commons Repository Citation Gibson, J. (2021). Proposal to Reduce Waste Pollution and Promote Efficientaste W Materials Lifecycle Management through Employment Programs and Recycling Infrastructure Investment. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/econ_student_papers_economies/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics Student Papers at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Papers in Local and Global Regional Economies by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Jake Gibson, MS Social and Applied Economics Wright State University EC 7250: Economic, Social and Ecological Systems Prof. Zdravka Todorova Problem Solving Proposal April 11, 2021 Proposal to Reduce Waste Pollution and Promote Efficient Waste Materials Lifecycle Management through Employment Programs and Recycling Infrastructure Investment By Jake Gibson 2 This proposal seeks to promote more efficient uses of materials by the consumer products
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV: Enabling Policies and Action to Support Innovative Solutions
    IV. Enabling policies and action to support innovative solutions © Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock Part IV Enabling policies and action to support innovative solutions About Part IV Advancing a chemistry that is fully sustainable is dependent on scaling up innovative solutions; engaging new actors; and putting in place enabling policies. Innovative solutions complement long-standing measures to achieve the sound management of chemicals and waste, as discussed in Part III. They are an essential element in achieving the sound management of chemicals and waste. While the topics discussed in Part IV have been the subject of discussions and action taken at national and international level to varying degrees, they have by and large not received the attention warranted in the context of chemicals and waste. Opportunities therefore exist to explore their role in a beyond 2020 framework. Relevant enabling policies and actions include education reform; support for technology innovation and financing; innovative business models; sustainable supply chain management; private sector metrics and reporting; fiscal incentives; and the empowerment of workers, consumers and citizens through information and participation rights. In exploring these topics, Part IV thus also draws attention to the contributions that can be made by a diverse range of actors, including entrepreneurs, academics, retailers, policymakers and citizens. Contents 1/ Envisioning and shaping the future of chemistry 504 2/ Green and sustainable chemistry education: nurturing a new generation
    [Show full text]
  • OHCHR Submissions for the EBRD's Draft Environmental and Social Policy
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Recommendations for EBRD’s Environmental and Social Policy (ESP) 15 March 2019 Introduction 1. The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the revised draft Environmental and Social Policy (ESP) of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Bank’s (EBRD or “Bank”). 2. Given OHCHR’s mandate, as well as the constraints of time, OHCHR’s comments focus principally on the content and potential impacts of the draft safeguards from the perspective of international human rights law, particularly in relation to social risk management, accompanied by specific comments and recommendations in relation to draft Performance Requirements 2, 5, 7, 9 and 10. We note that the EBRD is among the leaders in seeking to align its ESP with international human rights legal standards, for reasons which cannot be attributed to the EBRD’s explicitly “political” mandate, alone.1 Our comments aim to further strengthen these attributes of the ESP, to help ensure that the ESP is implemented in accordance with the evolving and contextual specificities of international human rights law, for more sustainable development outcomes and superior long- run investment returns. Environmental and Social Policy Human rights 3. OHCHR welcomes the EBRD’S reaffirmed commitment not to “knowingly finance projects that would contravene national laws or country obligations under relevant international treaties and agreements” (para. 2.3.) as well as the Bank’s commitment to “the respect for human rights in the projects” it finances (para. 2.4). 4. The draft policy further preserves the current ESP’s formulation regarding the client’s human rights responsibilities within their business activities: “EBRD will require clients…to respect human rights, avoid infringement on the human rights of others, and address adverse human rights risks and impacts” caused by their business activities (ibidem).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector Support for the Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) in Global Supply Chains: Conclusions from Practical Experience
    PUBLIC SECTOR SUPPORT FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) IN GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS: CONCLUSIONS FROM PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE Study prepared for the CSR Practice Foreign Investment Advisory Service Investment Climate Department By Business for Social Responsibility PricewaterhouseCoopers (Denmark) December, 2004 This report was prepared for the Corporate Social Responsibility Practice in the Investment Climate Department of the World Bank Group. The report was prepared by Peder Michael Pruzan-Jørgensen and Helle Bank Jør- gensen, both of PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Aron Cramer of Business for Social Responsibility. The report was financed by the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This report had originally been intended solely for the private use of the World Bank Group, in accordance with the terms of reference dated April 21, 2004. At the request of the World Bank Group, it has been made public. We do not accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 A Context . 1 B Summary of Recommendations . 3 C Implementing the Proposals . 5 1 Introduction . 9 The Basis of the Report . 9 Structure of the Report. 10 1.1 Scope of work, definitions and methodology . 10 1.1.1 Definitions. 10 1.1.2 Scope of work . 11 1.1.3 Research methodology . 12 1.1.4 Analytical Method . 13 2 Government’s Role . 15 2.1 Public governance challenge. 15 2.2 Why should national governments act? .
    [Show full text]
  • CSR Frame of Reference 2002
    CSR Frame of Reference Coalition of Dutch CSOs & Trade Unions actively promoting CSR Keizersgracht 132 1015 CW Amsterdam The Netherlands T: +31 (0)20 639 12 91 F: +31 (0)20 639 13 21 [email protected] www.mvo-platform.nl July 2003 Design:Clementien Heim Print:Offsetdrukkerij Peco BV,Amsterdam CONTENTS I. Introduction 2 II. CSR standards 5 1. Human rights 5 2. Labour 6 3. Environment 7 4. Consumer protection 8 5. Health 9 6. Fighting corruption 10 7. Other CSR aspects 10 III. Condition for compliance with CSR standards 11 IV. Operational aspects of CSR 11 1. Supply chain responsibilities 11 2. Stakeholder involvement 12 3. Transparency and reporting 12 CSR 4. Independent verification 13 Frame of Reference 2 CSR Frame of Reference I. Introduction call on CSOs to provide a coherent vi- sion for CSR This Frame of Reference for corporate social • to guide the members of the CSR responsibility (CSR) has been developed by Platform – individually as well as col- the “CSR Platform”, a coalition of Dutch lectively – in developing their strate- Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) actively gies and launching fresh initiatives promoting CSR. The CSR Frame of Reference with a view to promoting CSR. lists the relevant standards, agreements and operational aspects involved in CSR interna- The Dutch “Social and Economic Council” tionally. This is done on the basis of treaties, (SER) has issued recommendations on CSR guidelines and instruments enjoying broad in a document entitled “Corporate Social international support and leading, either di- Responsibility – A Dutch Approach”. In this rectly or indirectly, to corporate social ac- document, the SER (an overarching policy- countability and responsibilities.
    [Show full text]