DOCSLIB.ORG

The Aarhus Convention an Implementation Guide the Aarhus Convention: an Implementation Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Aarhus Convention an Implementation Guide the Aarhus Convention: an Implementation Guide UNECE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE The Aarhus Convention An Implementation Guide The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide Aarhus Convention: The Securing the public’s rights through access to information, public participation and access to justice for a healthy environment UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) The Aarhus Convention: An implementation guide © Shutterstock Second edition, 2014 2 FOREWORD BY THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS More than a decade after its entry into force on 30 October 2001, the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters is more important than ever. The Aarhus Convention remains the most ambitious venture in the field of environmental democracy under the auspices of the United Nations. The Convention is the only international legally binding instrument giving the public broad and concrete rights of participation in decision-making and access to information and justice regarding the environment. Last year, the importance of these rights was emphasized in the outcome document of the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development. The Aarhus Convention’s twin protections for environmental and human rights, and its focus on involving the public, provide a mechanism for holding governments to account in their efforts to address the multi-dimensional challenges facing our world today, including climate change, biodiversity loss, poverty reduction, increasing energy demands, rapid urbanization, and air and water pollution. The Guide is an essential reference for policy-makers, legislators and officials at all levels of government. It contains important guidance for members of the public, including non-governmental organizations, seeking to exercise their rights, as well as for those in the private sector engaged in activities that are subject to the Convention. The Guide will equally interest practitioners and academics specializing in the issues covered by the Convention, as well as States not currently party to the Convention. The second edition of the Guide builds on the considerable experience amassed during the Convention’s implementation. It provides practical examples and offers valuable insights from the findings of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, a unique body inspired by human rights treaty mechanisms. I commend this publication to all those with an interest in promoting environmental democracy and sustainable development. Ban Ki-Moon Secretary-General of the United Nations © Haf Elgar - Friends of the Earth - Cyfeillion y Ddaear Cymru of the Earth© Haf Elgar - Friends - Cyfeillion 3 PREFACE The first edition of the Aarhus Convention Implementation Guide was published in 2000,1 prior to the entry into force of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision- making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention) on 30 October 2001. The book was written by Mr. Stephen Stec and Ms. Susan Casey-Lefkowitz in collaboration with Mr. Jerzy Jendrośka as editorial adviser. In recognition that considerable experience in the Convention’s implementation had been gained since the first edition of the Implementation Guide was published, the Meeting of the Parties to the Convention, at its third session (Riga, 13–15 June 2008), requested an updated edition of the Implementation Guide be prepared.2 The second edition of the Implementation Guide was authored by independent experts Mr. Jonas Ebbesson, Mr. Helmut Gaugitsch (assisted by Ms. Marianne Miklau), Mr. Jerzy Jendrośka and Mr. Stephen Stec, and by Ms. Fiona Marshall from the secretariat of the Aarhus Convention, who also served as the project coordinator. In preparing the second edition, the objective was not to rewrite the Guide, but rather to update it in the light of the decade of practical experience gained in the Convention’s implementation since the first edition. Prior to the commencement of the updating process, national focal points and other stakeholders were invited to provide their input on matters they wished to see addressed in the second edition. The draft text for the second edition was circulated to national focal points and stakeholders for three rounds of comments, in November 2010, June 2011 and July 2012. All comments received were taken into account by the authors in the preparation of subsequent versions of the draft text. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.13.II.E.3 ISBN 978-92-1-117069-6 e-ISBN 978-92-1-056298-0 4 CONTENTS Foreword ............................................................................................................................ 3 Preface................................................................................................................................ 4 Contents ............................................................................................................................. 5 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................... 7 About the authors ................................................................................................................. 8 How to use this Guide ............................................................................................................ 9 List of abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 10 List of Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee findings ............................................................. 12 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 15 Preamble ............................................................................................................................. 22 GENERAL PART .................................................................................................................... 41 Article 1. Objective ................................................................................................................ 42 Article 2. Definitions .............................................................................................................. 44 Article 3. General provisions .................................................................................................... 59 PILLAR I - ACCESS TO INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 75 Article 4. Access to environmental information ........................................................................... 78 Article 5. Collection and dissemination of environmental information ................................................. 95 PILLAR II - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DECISION-MAKING ............................................................ 119 Article 6. Public participation in decisions on specific activities ...................................................... 126 Article 6, paragraph 11. Public participation in decisions on genetically modified organisms ............... 160 Article 6 bis. Public participation in decisions on the deliberate release into the environment and placing on the market of genetically modified organisms ........................... 163 Annex I bis. Modalities referred to in article 6 bis ......................................................................... 165 Article 7. Public participation concerning plans, programmes and policies relating to the environment .................................................................. 173 Article 8. Public participation during the preparation of executive regulations and/or generally applicable legally binding normative instruments ................................................ 181 PILLAR III - ACCESS TO JUSTICE ............................................................................................... 187 Article 9. Access to justice ....................................................................................................... 190 FINAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................... 209 Article 10. Meeting of the parties ............................................................................................. 209 Article 11. Right to vote.......................................................................................................... 216 Article 12. Secretariat ............................................................................................................ 217 Article 13. Annexes ............................................................................................................... 219 Article 14. Amendments to the convention ................................................................................ 219 Article 15. Review of compliance .............................................................................................. 222 Article 16. Settlement of disputes ............................................................................................ 225 Article 17. Signature .............................................................................................................. 226 Article 18. Depositary ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ngos: a Primer on the Evolution of the Organizations That Are Setting the Next Generation of "Regulations"
    NGOs: A Primer on the Evolution of the Organizations That Are Setting the Next Generation of “Regulations” Nongovernmental responsibility organizations Nongovernmental organizations (EHS&SR) profes- (NGOs) have been sionals who are around for more exercise a growing influence spending more and than 150 years. Over more of their time the last decade, over business on “nonregula- however, there has tory” issues driven been a subtle but by NGOs. steady shift in the nature of their influence over business. Background: NGOs as De Facto Rulemakers In essence, NGOs are beginning to act increas- The current dynamics between NGOs and the ingly like governmental regulatory agencies, issu- business world have been described in an article ing a new generation of de facto “regulations” in that we published in Corporate Environmental the form of standards, guidelines, and certifica- Strategy.1 In summary, that article presented the tions. Once gadflies and outsiders, NGOs increas- case that, until recently, it has been governments ingly are shifting to market-based approaches in that have defined corporate responsibility; com- order to effect change and gain a prominent place panies have tracked the environmental, health, at the table in stakeholder negotiations. safety, and social responsibility metrics dictated What are NGOs, and how did these organiza- by those government-defined laws and regula- tions evolve? What types of NGOs exist, and how tions. Not surprisingly, business executives have are they classified? How do they operate and wield responded to EHS&SR issues narrowly, viewing their power? And what are the critical issues they face if they want to expand their influence? This article offers a literature review of pub- Brijesh Nalinakumari lished information on NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BICYCLE RING in AARHUS, DENMARK: a Case Study of Maintaining People Friendly Environments While Managing Cycling Growth
    THE BICYCLE RING IN AARHUS, DENMARK: a case study of maintaining people friendly environments while managing cycling growth Urban Planning & Management | Master Thesis | Aalborg University | June 2017 Estella Johanna Hollander & Matilda Kristina Porsö Title: The Bicycle Ring in Aarhus, Denmark: a case study of maintaining people friendly environments while managing cycling growth Study: M.Sc. in UrBan Planning and Management, School of Architecture, Design and Planning, AalBorg University Project period: FeBruary to June 2017 Authors: Estella Johanna Hollander and Matilda Kristina Porsö Supervisor: Gunvor RiBer Larsen Pages: 111 pages Appendices: 29 pages (A-E) i Abstract This research project seeks to analyze the relationship Between cycling and people friendly environments, specifically focusing on the growth in cycling numbers and the associated challenges. To exemplify this relationship, this research project uses a case study of the Bicycle Ring (Cykelringen) in Aarhus, Denmark. Four corners around the Bicycle Ring, with different characteristics in the Built environment, are explored further. In cities with a growing population, such as Aarhus, moBility is an important focus because the amount of travel will increase, putting a higher pressure on the existing infrastructure. In Aarhus, cycling is used as a tool to facilitate the future demand of travel and to overcome the negative externalities associated with car travel. The outcome of improved mobility and accessibility is seen as complementary to a good city life in puBlic spaces. Therefore, it is argued that cycling is a tool to facilitate people friendly environments. Recently, the City of Aarhus has implemented cycle streets around the Bicycle Ring as a solution to improve the conditions around the ring.
    [Show full text]
  • Our View from City Tower
    Our view from City Tower A sustainable and grandiose building overlooking Aarhus. Welcome to the top of City Tower, which is Aarhus’s tallest and most prominent commercial building with a fantastic view. The construction of the building was completed in the summer of 2014. In August 2014, our 130 Aarhus employees moved into the premises totalling 4,500 m2 and occupying the 14th, 15th, 16th and 22nd floors of the building. City Tower spans a total of 34,000 m2 divided on 25 floors – the two bottom floors housing the cellar and the under- ground parking area. In addition to Bech-Bruun, City Tower also accommodates the employer Hans Lorenzen, the Comwell Hotel and the audit and consultancy firm Deloitte. World-class sustainable building amusement park Tivoli Friheden, the City Tower is the very first commercial Moesgaard Museum and Marselisborg building in Aarhus to meet the strict Palace. 2015 requirements for energy rating 1. To the east: The Port of Aarhus The building’s energy rating indicates The Port of Aarhus is among Denmark’s how many kWh are spent annually on largest commercial harbours and heating, ventilation, cooling and hot spans the horizon to the east. water per m2. At City Tower, integrated solar power cells have for example In 2013, 6,100 ships called at the Port, been installed on the south face, sup- and each year approx. 8m tonnes of plying energy to the building annually cargo pass through the Port of Aarhus. generating up to 180,000 kWh. The Port of Aarhus has a terminal for cruise ships, and the passenger ferry City Tower has also been granted the Mols-Linien also docks here.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Corporations
    PROVISIONAL EDITION Regulating Corporations A Resource Guide Désirée Abrahams* Geneva • December 2004 * Désirée Abrahams prepared this report during 2003 and early 2004, when she was a Research Assistant at the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) in Geneva, Switzerland. The author would like to thank Peter Utting, Kate Ives and Anita Tombez for their research and editorial support. The report was prepared under the UNRISD project “Promoting Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Developing Countries: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives”, which is partly funded by the MacArthur Foundation. This edition may be subject to minor modifications and copy-editing prior to formal publication. The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency engaging in multidisciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research programmes include: Civil Society and Social Movements; Democracy, Governance and Human Rights; Identities, Conflict and Cohesion; Social Policy and Development; and Technology, Business and Society. A list of the Institute’s free and priced publications can be obtained by contacting: UNRISD Reference Centre Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Tel +41 (0)22 917 3020 Fax +41 (0)22 917 0650 [email protected] www.unrisd.org Copyright © United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Commissioner Karel De Gucht European Commissioner for Trade European Commission BE-1049 Brussels May 19, 2014 Civil Society
    Commissioner Karel de Gucht European Commissioner for Trade European Commission BE-1049 Brussels May 19, 2014 Civil society call for full transparency about the EU-US trade negotiations Dear Commissioner De Gucht, The undersigned organisations are writing to express deep concerns about the lack of transparency around the ongoing trade talks on a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). We are calling on you to open the negotiation process to the public, by releasing the negotiating mandate, documents submitted by the EU, and negotiating texts. The European Commission has repeatedly stated that trade and investment between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) are already highly integrated, and that the main focus of TTIP will be to achieve regulatory convergence by removing so-called non-tariff barriers to trade. This means that the outcome has much less to do with traditional trade issues such as tariffs, than with the regulations and standards that apply in the EU and the US and that affect every single aspect of citizens’ daily lives – from the quality of the food we eat to the safety of chemicals we use, the energy we consume, or the impact of financial services on each of us. Civil society groups in the EU and in the US have voiced concerns that this might lower standards and remove safeguards across the board. They have requested greater transparency about the negotiations to address these concerns. The setting up of a stakeholder advisory group for the negotiations by the EU – although an improvement compared to previous negotiations – is far from sufficient to make the process fully transparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-American Court on Human Rights
    INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-23/17 OF NOVEMBER 15, 2017 REQUESTED BY THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA THE ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS (STATE OBLIGATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROTECTION AND GUARANTEE OF THE RIGHTS TO LIFE AND TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY: INTERPRETATION AND SCOPE OF ARTICLES 4(1) AND 5(1) IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS) the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”), composed of the following judges: Roberto F. Caldas, President Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, Vice President Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito, Judge Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, Judge, and L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire, Judge also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Articles 70 to 75 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), issues the following advisory opinion, structured as follows: - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRESENTATION OF THE REQUEST ........................................................................................ 4 II. PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COURT ...................................................................................... 6 III. JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Q-Nation Aarhus A/S Skolegade 5,1., 8000 Aarhus C
    Q-nation Aarhus A/S Skolegade 5,1., 8000 Aarhus C CVR-nr. 40 84 56 58 Årsrapport 7. oktober 2019 - 30. juni 2020 Årsrapporten er fremlagt og godkendt på selskabets ordinære generalforsamling den 18. august 2020. Nikolaj Langkilde Dirigent Indholdsfortegnelse Side Påtegninger Ledelsespåtegning 1 Den uafhængige revisors revisionspåtegning 2 Ledelsesberetning Selskabsoplysninger 5 Ledelsesberetning 6 Årsregnskab 7. oktober 2019 - 30. juni 2020 Resultatopgørelse 7 Balance 8 Noter 10 Anvendt regnskabspraksis 12 275013 Q-nation Aarhus A/S · Årsrapport for 2019/20 Ledelsespåtegning Bestyrelse og direktion har dags dato aflagt årsrapporten for regnskabsåret 7. oktober 2019 - 30. juni 2020 for Q-nation Aarhus A/S. Årsrapporten er aflagt i overensstemmelse med årsregnskabsloven. Vi anser den valgte regnskabspraksis for hensigtsmæssig, og efter vores opfattelse giver årsregnskabet et retvisende billede af selskabets aktiver, passiver og finansielle stilling pr. 30. juni 2020 samt af resul tatet af selskabets aktiviteter for regnskabsåret 7. oktober 2019 - 30. juni 2020. Ledelsesberetningen indeholder efter vores opfattelse en retvisende redegørelse for de forhold, som beretningen omhandler. Årsrapporten indstilles til generalforsamlingens godkendelse. Aarhus C, den 18. august 2020 Direktion Peter Find Direktør Bestyrelse Nikolaj Langkilde Madsen Christian Hoffmann Peter Find Formand Q-nation Aarhus A/S · Årsrapport for 2019/20 1 Den uafhængige revisors revisionspåtegning Til aktionærerne i Q-nation Aarhus A/S Konklusion Vi har revideret årsregnskabet for Q-nation Aarhus A/S for regnskabsåret 7. oktober 2019 - 30. juni 2020, der omfatter anvendt regnskabspraksis, resultatopgørelse, balance og noter. Årsregnskabet udar- bejdes efter årsregnskabsloven. Det er vores opfattelse, at årsregnskabet giver et retvisende billede af selskabets aktiver, passiver og fi- nansielle stilling pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Clientearth Company Limited by Guarantee Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2013
    Charity Registration No. 1053988 Company Registration No. 2863827 (England and Wales) CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013 CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Trustees S Hockman M Mclntosh W Mclntosh M Robert M Stanley The Honorable E Young P Harvey B Eno H Jones H Tinsley F Serfaty Secretary BWB Secretarial Limted Charity number 1053988 Company number 2863827 Principal address The Hothouse 274 Richmond Road London E8 3QW Registered office 2-6 Cannon Street London EC4M 6YH Auditors Arram Berlyn Gardner 30 City Road London EC1Y 2AB CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE CONTENTS Page Trustees' report Statement of trustees' responsibilities 18 Independent auditors' report 19-20 Statement of financial activities 21 Balance sheet —Group 18 Balance sheet - Parent 19 Notes to the accounts 24- 38 CLIENTEARTH COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE TRUSTEES' REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013 The trustees (who are also the directors of ClientEarth for the purposes of company law) present their report and accounts for the period ended 3t December 2013. The accounts have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies set out in note t to the accounts and comply with the Companies Act 2006 and the Statement of Recommended Practice, 'Accounting and Reporting by Charities', issued in March 2005. Objectives and activities The charity's objects are: ~ To promote and encourage the enhancement, restoration, conservation and protection
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Justice Under the Aarhus Convention
    Access to justice under the Aarhus Convention Prof. Marc Pallemaerts Institute for European Studies Vrije Universiteit Brussel Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention • Art. 9(1) – access to review procedure for any person whose request for environmental information has been ignored, refused or inadequately answered • Art. 9(2) – access to review procedure for members of the public concerned to challenge substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to public participation provisions of art. 6 • Art. 9(3) – access to administrative or judicial procedures for members of the public to challenge other acts or omissions which contravene provisions of national law relating to the environment Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention • Art. 9(4) – review procedure shall provide adequate and effective remedies and be fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive • Art. 9(5) – information to be provided to the public on access to review procedures and establishment of assistance mechanisms to remove or reduce financial and other barriers to access to justice to be considered Mandate of the Aarhus Convention Task Force on Access to Justice • Established by decision I/5 of the 1st Meeting of the Parties (Lucca, Oct. 2002) • To report to the 2nd Meeting of the Parties (Almaty, May 2005) through the Working Group of the Parties (Geneva, Nov. 2004) • 3 meetings with participation of government experts, NGOs, academic experts and representatives of judiciary and other legal professions Mandate of the Aarhus Convention Task
    [Show full text]
  • Presseark Hastighedsopgraderinger
    PRESSEARK HASTIGHEDSOPGRADERINGER Dato J. nr. Hastighedsopgraderinger i forbindelse med Timemodellen Der er med aftalen afsat over 2 mia. kr. til hastighedsopgraderinger i forbindel- se med Timemodellen. Udover nye banestrækninger, der skal etableres for at realisere timemodellen, skal der også ske hastighedsopgraderinger til op til 200 km/t på dele af den eksisterende jernbane. På strækningen mellem Aarhus-Aalborg vil der ske en opgradering af både ba- nerne Aarhus-Hobro og Hobro-Aalborg. Endelig vil der ske fire opgraderinger på strækningen Odense-Aarhus. Trafikale gevinster Banestrækningen mellem Odense-Aarhus og Aarhus-Hobro har i dag i stor udstrækning en kroget linjeføring, som medfører en del hastighedsbegræns- ninger. Ved en opgradering, som bl.a. omfatter udretning af kurver, vil der mel- lem Fredericia-Aarhus opnås en rejsetidsbesparelse på 2 minutter, som bidra- ger til at realisere timemodellen mellem Odense og Aarhus. Opgraderingerne mellem Aarhus-Hobro bidrager til, at den samlede rejsetid mellem Aarhus-Aalborg bringes ned til 1 time. Anlæggene for timemodellen er udvalgt ud fra den mest omkostningseffektive måde at realisere timemodellen på målt pr. anlægskrone i forhold til sparet rejsetid. Strækningen Aarhus-Aalborg Banestrækningen Hobro-Aalborg, som i dag har en lav maksimal hastighed for en hovedbane på 120 km/t, er i forbindelse med trafikaftalen i aftalekredsen bag ”En Grøn Transportpolitik” fra marts 2013 besluttet opgraderet til 160 km/t. Desuden undersøges yderligere opgradering til 200 km/t ifm. timemo- dellen. Der afsættes 108 mio. kr. til hastighedsopgradering til 200 km/t med nærværende aftale. Banedanmark har endvidere gennemført en forundersøgelse af opgradering af banestrækningen Aarhus-Hobro for at opnå en times rejsetid mellem Aarhus og Aalborg.
    [Show full text]
  • AARHUS: Living Summer Streets in Aarhus
    AarhusMunicipality : opyright c , Graven summer street summer Graven AARHUS: Living summer streets in Aarhus As a part of the “Summer Pedestrian Street Pilot Project”, two streets in Aarhus by the name Graven and Vestergade were converted into pedestrian streets from June to October 2019. The project’s ob- jective was to enhance the liveable urban environment by creating living and green streets. This con- tributed to the cities.multimodal’s objective by making sustainable mobility attractive and easy to adopt. During the cold months Vestergade is an ordinary inner-city street with many cafés and smaller com- panies. The speed limit is 50 kilometres per hour. “Graven” – which is one of the oldest streets in Aarhus is a cycling street with mixed traffic. The cars on “Graven” must adapt to the speed of the cyclists. In order to accomplish the anticipated outcomes, the two streets were opened for pedestrians and the speed limit was reduced. The streets and pavements were used to facilitate activities that underpinned a good and liveable urban environment. For instance, cafés, restaurants and bars had their outdoor service moved to the lanes of the streets. Also, the streets were decorated with plants and trees which contributed to a greener urban life. At the same time, the whole streets were transformed into a pe- destrian zone with new signage. Both cars and bikes now had to follow the pace of the pedestrians. The speed limit was set to 15 kilometres per hour, even the new shared e-scooters were coded to not exceed this limit. Regardless of whether you cycle, walk or drive along Vestergade, you will encounter a diversity of stores and restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Part IV: Enabling Policies and Action to Support Innovative Solutions
    IV. Enabling policies and action to support innovative solutions © Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock Part IV Enabling policies and action to support innovative solutions About Part IV Advancing a chemistry that is fully sustainable is dependent on scaling up innovative solutions; engaging new actors; and putting in place enabling policies. Innovative solutions complement long-standing measures to achieve the sound management of chemicals and waste, as discussed in Part III. They are an essential element in achieving the sound management of chemicals and waste. While the topics discussed in Part IV have been the subject of discussions and action taken at national and international level to varying degrees, they have by and large not received the attention warranted in the context of chemicals and waste. Opportunities therefore exist to explore their role in a beyond 2020 framework. Relevant enabling policies and actions include education reform; support for technology innovation and financing; innovative business models; sustainable supply chain management; private sector metrics and reporting; fiscal incentives; and the empowerment of workers, consumers and citizens through information and participation rights. In exploring these topics, Part IV thus also draws attention to the contributions that can be made by a diverse range of actors, including entrepreneurs, academics, retailers, policymakers and citizens. Contents 1/ Envisioning and shaping the future of chemistry 504 2/ Green and sustainable chemistry education: nurturing a new generation
    [Show full text]