DOCSLIB.ORG

The True Cost of Chevron an Alternative Annual Report May 2011 the True Cost of Chevron: an Alternative Annual Report May 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The True Cost of Chevron an Alternative Annual Report May 2011 the True Cost of Chevron: an Alternative Annual Report May 2011 The True Cost of Chevron An Alternative Annual Report May 2011 The True Cost of Chevron: An Alternative Annual Report May 2011 Introduction . 1 III . Around the World . 23 I . Chevron Corporate, Political and Economic Overview . 2. Angola . 23. Elias Mateus Isaac & Albertina Delgado, Open Society Map of Global Operations and Corporate Basics . .2 Initiative for Southern Africa, Angola The State of Chevron . .3 Australia . 25 Dr . Jill StJohn, The Wilderness Society of Western Australia; Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange Teri Shore, Turtle Island Restoration Project Chevron Banks on a Profitable Political Agenda . .4 Burma (Myanmar) . .27 Tyson Slocum, Public Citizen Naing Htoo, Paul Donowitz, Matthew Smith & Marra Silencing Local Communities, Disenfranchising Shareholders . .5 Guttenplan, EarthRights International Paul Donowitz, EarthRights International Canada . 29 Resisting Transparency: An Industry Leader . 6. Chevron in Alberta . 29 Isabel Munilla, Publish What You Pay United States; Eriel Tchwkwie Deranger & Brant Olson, Rainforest Paul Donowitz, EarthRights International Action Network Chevron’s Ever-Declining Alternative Energy Commitment . .7 Chevron in the Beaufort Sea . 31 Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange Andrea Harden-Donahue, Council of Canadians China . .32 II . The United States . 8 Wen Bo, Pacific Environment Colombia . 34 Chevron’s U .S . Coal Operations . 8. Debora Barros Fince, Organizacion Wayuu Munsurat, Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange with support from Alex Sierra, Global Exchange volunteer Alaska . .9 Ecuador . 36 Bob Shavelson & Tom Evans, Cook Inletkeeper Han Shan, Amazon Watch, with support from California . 11. Ginger Cassady, Rainforest Action Network Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange Indonesia . 39 Richmond Refinery . 13 Pius Ginting, WALHI-Friends of the Earth Indonesia Nile Malloy & Jessica Tovar, Communities for a Better Iraq . 41. Environment; Marilyn Langlois, Richmond Progressive Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange; Alliance Thomas J . Buonomo, Iraq Veterans Against the War El Segundo Refinery . 15. Kazakhstan & Turkmenistan . 43 Jesse Marquez, Coalition For A Safe Environment Michelle Kinman, Sergey Solyanik & Kate Watters, Mississippi . 16. Crude Accountability Pascagoula Refinery Nigeria . 45 Steve Shepard, Gulf Coast Sierra Club Nnimmo Bassey, Environmental Rights Action/Friends Texas . 17 of the Earth Nigeria; Emem Okon, Kebetkache Women’s Luke Metzger, Environment Texas; Resource and Development Centre; Laura Livoti & Marc Bryan Parras, Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Evans, Justice In Nigeria Now Services The North Sea . 47 Chevron Offshore . 18 Keiller MacDuff, Greenpeace Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange Philippines . .48 The High Cost of Offshore Drilling . 20 Aileen Suzara & Mia Villanueva, Filipino/American Antonia Juhasz, Global Exchange; Coalition for Environmental Solidarity Julia Ritchie, Environment California; Thailand . .50 Angela Howe, Surfrider Foundation Songwoot Patkaew & Prasitchai Nunaun Utah . 22. Nicole Widmer, Utah Rivers Council IV . The True Cost of Chevron Network . 51 V . Chevron’s Obligations . .52 VI . Resources . 53 VII . Endnotes . .54 Note: Due to space constraints, the print version of this report includes truncated endnotes. The fully sourced version is posted at www.TrueCostofChevron.com. Each participating organization and contributing author or editor is solely responsible for the content that they have contributed under the portions of this report expressly attributed to them; they do not necessarily endorse, assume no liability for, and are not responsible for, the content of any portion of this report attributed to any other organization or author, and make no warranties that such content is accurate . The editors and all participating organizations and authors are jointly responsible for the content of the introduction and recommendations . Cover: Lydia Aguinda, daughter of Maria Aguinda, lead plaintiff in the historic Aguinda vs . Chevron lawsuit in Ecuador, outside their home in Rumipamba, cleaning up a former Texaco waste pit/oil spill in quichua ancestral territory . Photo by Mitchell Anderson, Amazon Watch Introduction CEO JOHN Watson opens Chevron’s 2010 Annual Report a joint venture that includes Chevron—were documented by by telling the corporation’s stockholders that “2010 was an EarthRights International. outstanding year for Chevron.”1 In 2010, in an effort to silence local community voices opposed to the corporation’s destructive practices, Chevron dis- We do not agree. enfranchised shareholders by denying admission to its annual We, the communities who bear the costs of Chevron’s op- shareholder meeting to 17 individuals who held legal proxies. erations, have witnessed a year in which Chevron’s performance 2010 was not an outstanding year for the communities was anything but exceptional. As we have documented in this where Chevron operates. third installment of the True Cost of Chevron: An Alternative The campaigns undertaken by communities around the Annual Report, Chevron continues its long history of ravaging world to hold Chevron accountable for its actions were out- natural environments, violating human rights, ignoring the standing. The acknowledgements of Chevron’s wrongdoings longstanding decisions of Indigenous communities, destroying by government entities in locations around the globe were out- traditional livelihoods, and converting its dollars into unjust standing. The hard fought victories achieved by citizens uniting political influence in the United States and around the world. to change the Chevron Way were outstanding. This report is a record of egregious corporate behavior After nearly 18 years of litigation, the indigenous people that—in locations as diverse as California, Burma, Colombia, and campesinos of the Ecuadorian Amazon achieved a criti- Ecuador, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, the Philippines and the U.S. cal milestone in 2010. An Ecuadorian court ordered Chevron Gulf Coast—has spanned decades and carries on today. to pay $9.5 billion for cleanup, clean water, health care and In the year that saw the world’s largest unintentional oil other reconstruction efforts for the tens of thousands of people spill, intensifying global concerns about the safety of the hydro- affected by the company’s widespread contamination in the carbon industry, Chevron has failed to change its behavior. region. In 2010, Chevron pursued ever-riskier and ever-deeper off- Environment Texas, the Sierra Club and the National shore projects in the South China Sea, the North Sea, the U.S. Environmental Law Center reached a settlement in 2010 with Gulf Coast, and the Canadian Arctic. Chevron Phillips Chemical requiring the company to pay a $2 In 2010, Chevron intensified its investments in three million penalty and implement major changes at its chemical controversial liquefied natural gas projects in areas of western plant in Baytown, Texas. The plant had violated its clean air Australia that have tremendous international conservation permits hundreds of times since 2003, leading to more than significance. one million pounds of illegal emissions. In 2010, Chevron announced a major expansion of its In an unprecedented victory for the community of Rich- Alberta, Canada tar sands projects, which are destroying the mond, California, in 2010 the State Court of Appeals upheld environment and severely impacting the health, livelihood and the majority of findings in a lower court decision that the cultural preservation of Indigenous communities living down- Environmental Impact Report for the expansion of Chevron’s stream from this destructive development. Richmond refinery violated state environmental law. In 2010, a rupture of Chevron’s pipeline in Salt Lake City, After decades of campaigning against Chevron’s highly pol- Utah dumped over 33,000 gallons of oil into Red Butte Creek, luting coal operations, communities in Alabama, New Mexico exposing residents to oil fumes and unknown health impacts and Wyoming welcomed—with cautious optimism—Chevron’s as the pollution flowed downstream through this densely announcement that 2010 would be the year the corporation populated streambed. After the pipeline was turned back on would exit the coal industry. under Chevron’s assurances of safety, a second rupture occurred We celebrate these triumphs and the many courageous within a few hundred feet of the first spill just 5 months later, individuals whose refusal to be silenced has been instrumental dumping an additional 21,000 gallons of oil. in bringing Chevron’s egregious actions to light. In 2010, Chevron continued its well-documented history Even so, there is much work to be done. Chevron is vigor- of releasing toxic pollution in both Angola and Nigeria through ously contesting the landmark verdict in the Ecuador case and recurrent leaks and waste discharges, and the harmful practice is continuing flagrant violations of environmental and human of gas flaring. rights around the globe. As Luis Yanza, coordinator for the In 2010, the Chevron joint venture developing the super- Affected People’s Assembly in Ecuador, writes, “the struggle will giant Tengiz Field in Kazakhstan emitted such high levels of continue today stronger than before . to ensure that justice toxins into the air that the country’s government fined the triumphs over impunity.” operation nearly $64 million. We invite you to read our report of the true cost of Chev- In 2010, a Chevron pipeline explosion covered part of an ron’s operations in communities from Alaska to Thailand, to Indonesian village
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iraq: Oil and Gas Legislation, Revenue Sharing, and U.S. Policy
    Order Code RL34064 Iraq: Oil and Gas Legislation, Revenue Sharing, and U.S. Policy Updated July 2, 2008 Christopher M. Blanchard Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Iraq: Oil and Gas Legislation, Revenue Sharing, and U.S. Policy Summary Iraqi leaders continue to debate a package of hydrocarbon sector and revenue sharing legislation that would define the terms for the future management and development of the country’s significant oil and natural gas resources. The package includes an oil and gas sector framework law and three supporting laws that would outline revenue sharing, restructure Iraq’s Ministry of Oil, and create an Iraqi National Oil Company. Both the Bush Administration and Congress consider the passage of oil and gas sector framework and revenue sharing legislation as important benchmarks that would indicate the current Iraqi government’s commitment to promoting political reconciliation and long term economic development in Iraq. Section 1314 of the FY2007 Supplemental Appropriations Act [P.L.110-28] specifically identified the enactment and implementation of legislation “to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients” and “to ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner” as benchmarks. The Administration reported to Congress on these benchmarks in July and September 2007. A draft framework law approved by Iraq’s Council of Ministers (cabinet) in July 2007 did not include revenue sharing arrangements. Iraq’s Council of Representatives (parliament) has not taken action to consider the legislation to date because of ongoing political disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngos: a Primer on the Evolution of the Organizations That Are Setting the Next Generation of "Regulations"
    NGOs: A Primer on the Evolution of the Organizations That Are Setting the Next Generation of “Regulations” Nongovernmental responsibility organizations Nongovernmental organizations (EHS&SR) profes- (NGOs) have been sionals who are around for more exercise a growing influence spending more and than 150 years. Over more of their time the last decade, over business on “nonregula- however, there has tory” issues driven been a subtle but by NGOs. steady shift in the nature of their influence over business. Background: NGOs as De Facto Rulemakers In essence, NGOs are beginning to act increas- The current dynamics between NGOs and the ingly like governmental regulatory agencies, issu- business world have been described in an article ing a new generation of de facto “regulations” in that we published in Corporate Environmental the form of standards, guidelines, and certifica- Strategy.1 In summary, that article presented the tions. Once gadflies and outsiders, NGOs increas- case that, until recently, it has been governments ingly are shifting to market-based approaches in that have defined corporate responsibility; com- order to effect change and gain a prominent place panies have tracked the environmental, health, at the table in stakeholder negotiations. safety, and social responsibility metrics dictated What are NGOs, and how did these organiza- by those government-defined laws and regula- tions evolve? What types of NGOs exist, and how tions. Not surprisingly, business executives have are they classified? How do they operate and wield responded to EHS&SR issues narrowly, viewing their power? And what are the critical issues they face if they want to expand their influence? This article offers a literature review of pub- Brijesh Nalinakumari lished information on NGOs.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Policy Framework for Iraq's Petroleum Industry and An
    Towards a Policy Framework for Iraq’s Petroleum Industry and an Integrated Federal Energy Strategy Submitted by Luay Jawad al-Khatteeb To the University of Exeter As a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Middle East Politics In January 2017 The thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgment. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature ......................................................... i Abstract: The “Policy Framework for Iraq’s Petroleum Industry” is a logical structure that establishes the rules to guide decisions and manage processes to achieve economically efficient outcomes within the energy sector. It divides policy applications between regulatory and regulated practices, and defines the governance of the public sector across the petroleum industry and relevant energy portfolios. In many “Rentier States” where countries depend on a single source of income such as oil revenues, overlapping powers of authority within the public sector between policy makers and operators has led to significant conflicts of interest that have resulted in the mismanagement of resources and revenues, corruption, failed strategies and the ultimate failure of the system. Some countries have succeeded in identifying areas for progressive reform, whilst others failed due to various reasons discussed in this thesis. Iraq fits into the category of a country that has failed to implement reform and has become a classic case of a rentier state.
    [Show full text]
  • Re:Imagining Change
    WHERE IMAGINATION BUILDS POWER RE:IMAGINING CHANGE How to use story-based strategy to win campaigns, build movements, and change the world by Patrick Reinsborough & Doyle Canning 1ST EDITION Advance Praise for Re:Imagining Change “Re:Imagining Change is a one-of-a-kind essential resource for everyone who is thinking big, challenging the powers-that-be and working hard to make a better world from the ground up. is innovative book provides the tools, analysis, and inspiration to help activists everywhere be more effective, creative and strategic. is handbook is like rocket fuel for your social change imagination.” ~Antonia Juhasz, author of e Tyranny of Oil: e World’s Most Powerful Industry and What We Must Do To Stop It and e Bush Agenda: Invading the World, One Economy at a Time “We are surrounded and shaped by stories every day—sometimes for bet- ter, sometimes for worse. But what Doyle Canning and Patrick Reinsbor- ough point out is a beautiful and powerful truth: that we are all storytellers too. Armed with the right narrative tools, activists can not only open the world’s eyes to injustice, but feed the desire for a better world. Re:Imagining Change is a powerful weapon for a more democratic, creative and hopeful future.” ~Raj Patel, author of Stuffed & Starved and e Value of Nothing: How to Reshape Market Society and Redefine Democracy “Yo Organizers! Stop what you are doing for a couple hours and soak up this book! We know the importance of smart “issue framing.” But Re:Imagining Change will move our organizing further as we connect to the powerful narrative stories and memes of our culture.” ~ Chuck Collins, Institute for Policy Studies, author of e Economic Meltdown Funnies and other books on economic inequality “Politics is as much about who controls meanings as it is about who holds public office and sits in office suites.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Corporations
    PROVISIONAL EDITION Regulating Corporations A Resource Guide Désirée Abrahams* Geneva • December 2004 * Désirée Abrahams prepared this report during 2003 and early 2004, when she was a Research Assistant at the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) in Geneva, Switzerland. The author would like to thank Peter Utting, Kate Ives and Anita Tombez for their research and editorial support. The report was prepared under the UNRISD project “Promoting Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility in Developing Countries: The Potential and Limits of Voluntary Initiatives”, which is partly funded by the MacArthur Foundation. This edition may be subject to minor modifications and copy-editing prior to formal publication. The United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) is an autonomous agency engaging in multidisciplinary research on the social dimensions of contemporary problems affecting development. Its work is guided by the conviction that, for effective development policies to be formulated, an understanding of the social and political context is crucial. The Institute attempts to provide governments, development agencies, grassroots organizations and scholars with a better understanding of how development policies and processes of economic, social and environmental change affect different social groups. Working through an extensive network of national research centres, UNRISD aims to promote original research and strengthen research capacity in developing countries. Current research programmes include: Civil Society and Social Movements; Democracy, Governance and Human Rights; Identities, Conflict and Cohesion; Social Policy and Development; and Technology, Business and Society. A list of the Institute’s free and priced publications can be obtained by contacting: UNRISD Reference Centre Palais des Nations 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Tel +41 (0)22 917 3020 Fax +41 (0)22 917 0650 [email protected] www.unrisd.org Copyright © United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Commissioner Karel De Gucht European Commissioner for Trade European Commission BE-1049 Brussels May 19, 2014 Civil Society
    Commissioner Karel de Gucht European Commissioner for Trade European Commission BE-1049 Brussels May 19, 2014 Civil society call for full transparency about the EU-US trade negotiations Dear Commissioner De Gucht, The undersigned organisations are writing to express deep concerns about the lack of transparency around the ongoing trade talks on a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). We are calling on you to open the negotiation process to the public, by releasing the negotiating mandate, documents submitted by the EU, and negotiating texts. The European Commission has repeatedly stated that trade and investment between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) are already highly integrated, and that the main focus of TTIP will be to achieve regulatory convergence by removing so-called non-tariff barriers to trade. This means that the outcome has much less to do with traditional trade issues such as tariffs, than with the regulations and standards that apply in the EU and the US and that affect every single aspect of citizens’ daily lives – from the quality of the food we eat to the safety of chemicals we use, the energy we consume, or the impact of financial services on each of us. Civil society groups in the EU and in the US have voiced concerns that this might lower standards and remove safeguards across the board. They have requested greater transparency about the negotiations to address these concerns. The setting up of a stakeholder advisory group for the negotiations by the EU – although an improvement compared to previous negotiations – is far from sufficient to make the process fully transparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 23, 2007 No. 85 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. THE JOURNAL The Senator from Michigan (Mr. Chaplain Marc Unger, California The SPEAKER. The Chair has exam- LEVIN) (Democratic Co-Chairman). State Military Reserve, attached to the ined the Journal of the last day’s pro- The Senator from Delaware (Mr. 1–184th Infantry, California Army Na- ceedings and announces to the House BIDEN) (Democratic Co-Chairman). tional Guard, Exeter, California, of- her approval thereof. The Senator from New Jersey (Mr. fered the following prayer: Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- LAUTENBERG) (Democratic Co-Chair- O God, You have been our refuge in nal stands approved. man). every generation. I thank You, Lord, f The Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. for granting truths self-evident, and KENNEDY). endowing us, our Creator, with certain MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Senator from North Dakota (Mr. unalienable rights: Life, liberty, and A message from the Senate by Ms. DORGAN). the pursuit of happiness, our freedom. Curtis, one of its clerks, announced The Senator from Illinois (Mr. DUR- Help this body, O Lord, to remember that the Senate has passed without BIN). that our freedom was bought with a amendment a bill of the House of the The Senator from Florida (Mr. NEL- price, the blood of our heroes. And de- following title: SON). fense of our freedom comes at the same H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-American Court on Human Rights
    INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVISORY OPINION OC-23/17 OF NOVEMBER 15, 2017 REQUESTED BY THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA THE ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS (STATE OBLIGATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROTECTION AND GUARANTEE OF THE RIGHTS TO LIFE AND TO PERSONAL INTEGRITY: INTERPRETATION AND SCOPE OF ARTICLES 4(1) AND 5(1) IN RELATION TO ARTICLES 1(1) AND 2 OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS) the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”), composed of the following judges: Roberto F. Caldas, President Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor Poisot, Vice President Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto Judge Elizabeth Odio Benito, Judge Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, Judge, and L. Patricio Pazmiño Freire, Judge also present, Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the American Convention” or “the Convention”) and Articles 70 to 75 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), issues the following advisory opinion, structured as follows: - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRESENTATION OF THE REQUEST ........................................................................................ 4 II. PROCEEDING BEFORE THE COURT ...................................................................................... 6 III. JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tyler Priest Curriculum Vitae
    Tyler Priest Curriculum Vitae 1817 Oxford St. 325A Melcher Hall Houston, TX 77008 Bauer College of Business (713) 868-4540 University of Houston [email protected] Houston, TX 77204-6201 (713) 743-3669 [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Madison, History (December 1996) Minor Field: Latin American Studies Languages: Portuguese, French M.A. University of Wisconsin-Madison, History (December 1990) B.A. Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota, History (June 1986) EMPLOYMENT Director of Global Studies and Clinical Professor, C.T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, March 2004-present http://www.bauer.uh.edu/search/directory/profile.asp?firstname=Tyler&lastname=Priest http://www.bauerglobalstudies.org/archives/global-studies-faculty-and-staff Senior Policy Analyst, National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, September 2010-April 2011, http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/ Historical Consultant, History of Offshore Oil and Gas Industry in Southern Louisiana Research Project, Minerals Management Service, 2002-2005, MMS OCS Study 2004-049 Visiting Assistant Professor, University of Houston-Clear Lake, August 2000-June 2002 Chief Historian, Shell Oil History Project, 1998-2001 Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for the Americas, University of Houston, 1997-1998 Researcher and Author, Brown & Root Inc. History Project on the Offshore Oil Industry, Houston, Texas, 1996-1997 Visiting Instructor, Middlebury College, 1994-1995 TEACHING FIELDS Energy History Public History Business History Environmental History History of Globalization History of Technology 2 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Courses taught: History of Globalization The United States in WWII History of Globalization (The Case of Petroleum) U.S. History 1914-1945 History of American Frontiers U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Effects of US Involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan Since The
    C3 TEACHERS World History and Geography II Inquiry (240-270 Minutes) What are the effects of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan since the Gulf War? This inquiry was designed by a group of high school students in Fairfax County Public Schools, Virginia. US Marines toppling a statue of Saddam Hussein in Firdos Square, Baghdad, on April 9, 2003 https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-fate-of-a-leg-of-a-statue-of-saddam-hussein Supporting Questions 1. What are the economic effects of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan since the Gulf War? 2. What are the political effects of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan since the Gulf War? 3. What are the social effects of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan since the Gulf War? THIS WORK IS LICENSE D UNDER A CREATIVE C OMMONS ATTRIBUTION - N ONCOMMERCIAL - SHAREAL I K E 4 . 0 INTERNATIONAL LICENS E. 1 C3 TEACHERS Overview - What are the effects of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan since the Gulf War? What are the effects of US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan since the Gulf War? VUS.14 The student will apply social science skills to understand political and social conditions in the United States during the early twenty-first century. Standards and Content WHII.14 The student will apply social science skills to understand the global changes during the early twenty-first century. HOOK: Option A: Students will go through a see-think-wonder thinking routine based off the primary source Introducing the depicting the toppling of a statue of Saddam Hussein, as seen on the previous page.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure Under Threat of Audit∗
    Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit∗ Thomas P. Lyon†and John W. Maxwell‡ May 23, 2007 Abstract We present an economic model of greenwash, in which a firm strategi- cally discloses environmental information and a non-governmental organi- zation (NGO) may audit and penalize the firm for failing to fully disclose its environmental impacts. We show that disclosures increase when the likelihood of good environmental performance is lower. Firms with in- termediate levels of environmental performance are more likely to engage in greenwash. Under certain conditions, NGO punishment of greenwash induces the firm to become less rather than more forthcoming about its environmental performance. We also show that complementarities with NGO auditing may justify public policies encouraging firms to adopt en- vironmental management systems. 1Introduction The most notable environmental trend in recent years has been the shift away from traditional regulation and towards voluntary programs by government and industry. Thousands of firms participate in the Environmental Protec- tion Agency’s partnership programs, and many others participate in industry- led environmental programs such as those of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, the Chicago Climate Exchange, and the American Chemistry Council’s “Responsible Care” program.1 However, there is growing scholarly concern that these programs fail to deliver meaningful environmental ∗We would like to thank Mike Baye, Rick Harbaugh, Charlie Kolstad, John Morgan, Michael Rauh, and participants in seminars at the American Economic Association meetings, Canadian Resource and Environmental Economics meetings, Dartmouth, Indiana University, Northwestern, UC Berkeley, UC Santa Barbara and University of Florida for their helpful comments.
    [Show full text]