National Disaster Risk Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Disaster Risk Assessment REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Gregorčičeva 20–25, 1000 Ljubljana T: +386 1 478 1000 F: +386 1 478 1607 E: [email protected] http://www.vlada.si Number: 84000-3/2016/3 Date: 7 December 2016 NATIONAL DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT Version 1.1 NATIONAL DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT, Version 1.1 2/464 _________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................3 1.2 Disaster risk assessment as a novelty in disaster Investigation .......................................................................................3 1.3 Organisational aspects of the development od disaster risk assessments .......................................................................5 2 Criteria for the assessment of risk impacts and the likelihood of disasters, and disaster risk matrices . 10 2.1 Criteria for the assessment of risk impacts and the likelihood of disasters .....................................................................10 2.1.1 Criteria for the assessment of risk impacts on people .............................................................................................10 2.1.2 Criteria for the assessment of economic and environmental risk impacts and risk impacts on cultural heritage ....11 2.1.3 The criteria for the assessment of political and social risk impacts .........................................................................12 2.1.3.1 The criteria for the assessment of risk impacts on the operation of state bodies…………………………………………...……13 2.1.3.2 The criteria for the assessment of risk impacts of the functioning of major infrastructure systems …………….……..........14 2.1.3.3 The criteria for the assessment of the psychosocial risk impact ……….…...…………………………………………...…….........15 2.1.3.4 The criteria for the assessment of risk impacts on internal policitcal stability…………………………………………………......16 2.1.3.5 The criteria for the assessment of risk impacts on financial stability ……………..…………………………………...…………….17 2.1.3.6 The criteria for the assessment of risk impacts on foreign policy or international stability..………….…….………..…….......19 2.1.3.7 The final value and level of political or social risk impacts……………………………...…………………………………………...…20 2.1.4 Criteria for the assessment of likelihood of disasters ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Disaster risk matrices ......................................................................................................................................................21 3 Disaster tisk and climate change ..................................................................................................................... 26 4 Disaster risk assessment and critical infrastructure ..................................................................................... 31 5 Summaries and conclusions of risk assessments for indiviudal disasters…………………………………..33 5.1 Risk Assessment for Earthquake ..................................................................................................................................34 5.2 Risk Assessment for Drought .......................................................................................................................................51 5.3 Risk Assessment for Floods ..........................................................................................................................................64 5.4 Risk Assessment for Hazards of Biological, Chemical, Environmental or Unknown Origin for Human Health .............91 5.5 Risk Assessment for Highly contagious Animal Diseases ..........................................................................................105 5.6 Risk Assessment for Nuclear or Radological Accidents .............................................................................................125 5.7 Risk Assessment for Railway Accidents .....................................................................................................................139 5.8 Risk Assessment for Aircraft Accidents ......................................................................................................................148 5.9 Risk Assessment for Large Wildfires ..........................................................................................................................161 5.10 Risk Assessment for Terrorism ...................................................................................................................................179 5.11 Risk Assessment for Ice Storms .................................................................................................................................186 5.12 Risk Assessment for Accidents involving Dangerous Substances .............................................................................197 6 Joint Disaster Risk Assessment .................................................................................................................... 212 7 Overview of selected risk scenarios and risk analyses ............................................................................... 228 8 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................... 229 9 Explanations and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... 231 10 Sources ......................................................................................................................................................... 233 11 Annexes ......................................................................................................................................................... 235 11.1 Annex 1: Risk scenario: Earthquake in the Central Part of Slovenia ..........................................................................236 11.2 Annex 2: Risk scenario: Major and catastrophic floods ..............................................................................................256 11.3 Annex 3: Risk scenario: The Occurrence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease .......................................................................293 11.4 Annex 4: Risk scenario: Aircraft Accident in a Populated Area...................................................................................317 11.5 Annex 5: Risk scenario: Large wildfire Šumka-Železna vrata-Trstelj ..........................................................................346 11.6 Annex 6: Risk scenario: Ice storm in February 2014 ..................................................................................................370 11.7 Annex 7: Risk scenario: Ice storm in February 2014 and Excessive Growth of Bark Beetle Populations after 2014 .429 12 Amendments and updates ............................................................................................................................ 462 December 2016 NATIONAL DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT, Version 1.1 3/464 _________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction Based on Article 5(2a) of the Decree Implementing the Decision on the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (Official Gazette of the RS, No. 62/14) the National Disaster Risk Assessment was prepared by the Administration Civil Protection and Disaster Relief of the Republic of Slovenia for (ACPDR), at the Ministry of Defence, as the National Coordinating Body for Disaster Risk Assessment in cooperation and in agreement with the authorities which are competent and responsible for the preparation of risk assessments for individual disasters. The Decree was adopted by Government Decision. The Decree Implementing the Decision on the Union Civil Protection Mechanism transposed the content of Article 6(a) of the Decision No. 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (Official Journal, No. 347 of 20 December 2013, p. 924) into Slovenian legislation. The National Disaster Risk Assessment is published on the public website of the ACPDR. 1.2 Disaster risk assessments as a novelty in disaster Investigation Natural and other disasters present a constant threat to mankind. Since progress and welfare introduce greater vulnerability to the society as a whole, disasters nowadays result in increasingly greater damage and consequences. For this reason, disaster risk assessments are gaining in importance. The European Commission (EC) also devotes great attention to activities which refer to the content and the preparation of disaster risk assessments. To this end, the EC issued guidelines at the end of 2010 entitled ‘The Risk Assessment and Mapping Guidelines for Disaster Management’, SEC (2010) 1626 final of 21 December 2010 (hereinafter ‘European Guidelines’), on the content and conceptual arrangement of the assessment and presentation of risks in risk management. Under these guidelines, the member states mutually coordinated the manner of production and the content of disaster risk assessments. By doing so, the EC wanted to encourage the
Recommended publications
  • Kamna Gorica - Dolnice
    NAROČNIK: Factor nepremičnine d.0.0. POROČILO O PREDHODNIH ARHEOLOŠKIH RAZISKAVAH NA LOKACIJI KAMNA GORICA - DOLNICE (EŠD 10671) (12.7. 2012) KULTURNOVARSTVENO SOGLASJE ŠT.: MK RS 62240-75/2012/2 IZDELALI: Samo Hvalec Iris Bekljanov Zidanšek Petra Vojaković Dr. Tomaž Verbič Ljubljana 2012 ©Arhej d.o.o. NAROČNIK: Factor nepremičnine d.o.o., Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana IZVAJALEC: Arhej d.o.o., Drožanjska 23, 8290 Sevnica ODGOVORNI VODJA DEL: mag. Matjaž Novšak, univ.dipl.arheol. SODELAVCI: Samo Hvalec, univ.dipl.arheol. David Badovinac, absolv. Arheol. STROKOVNI NADZOR: Boris Vičič, univ. dipl. arheol., konservatorski svetovalec; Zavod za varstvo kulturne dediščine Slovenije, OE Ljubljana, Tržaška 4, 1000 Ljubljana ©Arhej d.o.o. KAZALO 1. UVOD ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. GEOLOŠKI ORIS PROSTORA....................................................................................... 4 3. ZGODOVINSKI ORIS PROSTORA ............................................................................... 8 4. OPIS OBMOČJA IN DELOVNI POGOJI ....................................................................... 10 5. INTENZIVNI PODPOVRŠINSKI TERENSKI PREGLED ........................................... 11 6. STROJNE TESTNE SONDE ............................................................................................ 16 SKLEP ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Slovenian Farms Learn About Slovenian Cuisine with Dishes Made by Slovenian Housewives
    TOURISM ON FARMS IN SLOVENIA MY WAY OF COUNTRYSIDE HOLIDAYS. #ifeelsLOVEnia #myway www.slovenia.info www.farmtourism.si Welcome to our home Imagine the embrace of green 2.095.861 surroundings, the smell of freshly cut PEOPLE LIVE grass, genuine Slovenian dialects, IN SLOVENIA (1 JANUARY 2020) traditional architecture and old farming customs and you’ll start to get some idea of the appeal of our countryside. Farm 900 TOURIST tourism, usually family-owned, open their FARMS doors and serve their guests the best 325 excursion farms, 129 wineries, produce from their gardens, fields, cellars, 31 “Eights” (Osmice), smokehouses, pantries and kitchens. 8 camping sites, and 391 tourist farms with Housewives upgrade their grandmothers’ accommodation. recipes with the elements of modern cuisine, while farm owners show off their wine cellars or accompany their guests to the sauna or a swimming pool, and their MORE THAN children show their peers from the city 200.000 how to spend a day without a tablet or a BEE FAMILIES smartphone. Slovenia is the home of the indigenous Carniolan honeybee. Farm tourism owners are sincerely looking Based on Slovenia’s initiative, forward to your visit. They will help you 20 May has become World Bee Day. slow down your everyday rhythm and make sure that you experience the authenticity of the Slovenian countryside. You are welcome in all seasons. MORE THAN 400 DISTINCTIVE LOCAL AND REGIONAL FOODSTUFFS, DISHES AND DRINKS Matija Vimpolšek Chairman of the Association MORE THAN of Tourist Farms of Slovenia 30.000 WINE PRODUCERS cultivate grapevines on almost 16,000 hectares of vineyards.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian National Forum on Marine Litter REPORT
    Foto: Tina Primožič, RDC Koper Slovenian National Forum on Marine Litter REPORT 4 February 2015 Strunjan, Slovenia Regional Development Centre Koper MARLISCO is a FP7 project funded by the European Commission. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission Content 1. The project Marlisco ................................................................................................................ 2 2. The national forum on marine litter ........................................................................................ 3 3. Description of fora activities ................................................................................................... 4 4. Forum course ........................................................................................................................... 7 5. Panel discussion on marine litter issue ................................................................................. 10 6. Identifying Solutions to Marine Litter ................................................................................... 11 7. Forum closure ........................................................................................................................ 15 8. Marlisco exhibition on marine litter ...................................................................................... 15 9. Conclusions ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D19 Slovenia: Workshop Report 1: Development Vision, Objectives and Concept For
    PREPARATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT VISION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ALONG THE BAY OF KOPER AND PROGRAM DESIGN OF THE COASTAL AREA BETWEEN Izola and Koper REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE KOPER, Koper / Capodistria, MIOKO Studio, Portorož / Portorose D19 Slovenia: Workshop report 1: Development vision, objectives and concept for Koper Bay Prepared by: RRC KOPER: Slavko Mezek MIOKO Studio: dr. Ljudmila Koprivec, Endrigo Miojević PREPARATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT VISION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ALONG THE BAY OF KOPER AND PROGRAM DESIGN OF THE COASTAL AREA BETWEEN Izola and Koper REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE KOPER, Koper / Capodistria, MIOKO Studio, Portorož / Portorose Project Full Title TOWARDS THE OPERATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF MSP IN OUR COMMON MEDITERRANEAN SEA Project Acronym MSP-MED Gant Agreement Nr. 887390 Project Website www.MSPmed.eu Deliverable Nr. D19 Status Final (Final/Draft/Revised) Work Package WP2-Setting-up Maritime Spacial Plans Task Number 2.6 Slovenia: Development vision, objectives and concept for Koper Bay Responsible Institute RRC Koper Author/s dr. Ljudmila Koprivec, Endrigo Miojević, Slavko Mezek Infographics Recommended Citation Dissemination Level (Public/Partnerhip) Document History Modification Introduced Version Date Modification Modified by Reason Final 15.3.2021 PREPARATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT VISION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ALONG THE BAY OF KOPER AND PROGRAM DESIGN OF THE COASTAL AREA BETWEEN Izola and Koper REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE KOPER, Koper / Capodistria, MIOKO Studio, Portorož / Portorose Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Številka 52, Februar 2020
    9 772463 B SLO O VE N N I B O F J Z E Z 1 5 94 4 1 19 821805 GLASILO ZZB ZA VREDNOTE NOB SLOVENIJE februar 2020 BESED A Poštnina plačana pri pošti 1102 Ljubljana IMELI SMO LJUDI UVODNIK Janez 8. marec in Stanovnik še marsikaj 1922–2020 Velika množica ljudi je na ljubljanskih Žalah 6. februarja k zadnjemu počitku pospremila Janeza Stanovnika, nekdanjega predsednika Predsedstva SR Slovenije, nosilca partizanske spomenice 1941, častnega predsednika ZZB NOB Slovenije, Živa Vidmar partizana, tovariša, zavednega članica predsedstva Slovenca in častnega meščana ZZB NOB Slovenije Ljubljane. Kot je ob slovesu dejal prvi predsednik samostojne a, pred nami je 8. Slovenije Milan Kučan, je z njim marec in še marsikaj! odšla ena najsvetlejših osebnosti Za nami je 75 let od tistega rodu Slovencev, ki je osvoboditve Ljubljane, pomembno zaznamoval naše 25 let od četrte ženske življenje v drugi polovici svetovne konference! 20. stoletja. DZavedamo se, da brez tovarištva in so- lidarnosti ne bi šlo na boljše. Ženske na STRAN 8-9 Slovenskem so že v NOB pokazale svojo Foto: Jani Alič voljo: razbile so okove tradicije. Prevzele so nase vso odgovornost, zato so bile vse: bile so aktivistke na terenu, kjer so zbirale hrano, obleko, orožje, sa- AKTUALNO nitetni material; bile so vodilne zdravnice v partizanskih bolnišnicah – nista bili O izdanem nauku samo Franja in Pavla, bile so še Ruža Šegedin, Božena Grosman in druge – bile so bojevnice, ki so imele svojo žensko Uničevanje komunistov verska dolžnost četo; 8. januarja 1943 je na Pohorju padel ves ženski vod skupaj z borci Po- horskega bataljona; danes še živi edina Josip Vidmar pravljična in naivna kakor vse mi- jugoslovanska heroina Andreana Druži- tologije.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Slovenia
    TOWN Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context Applied Research 2013/1/23 Case Study Report | Slovenia Version 05/09/2013 ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the interim results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Leuven, 2013. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. List of authors Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Samo Drobne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Miha Konjar, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia © Institute UL-FGG d.o.o, Jamova 2, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ESPON 2013 i Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the RSG, Their Role and Potential
    Report on the RSG, their role and potential Deliverable D.T1.1.2 WPT-1 Gianluca Lentini, Francesca Polettini Poliedra – Politecnico di Milano 1. The Regional Stakeholder Groups in a 4-H logic One of the WPT-1 main outputs is the definition of the Regional Stakeholder Groups (RSG), the role of which is to accompany the smart transition in the Test Areas. The definition of the RSG is necessary in order to assist the assessment of the level of smartness of each Test Area, give input for best practices and test the digital exchange platform (DEP), codesign the toolbox and facilitate the transfer of project results to the policy level. The selection of the stakeholders depends on the issue in which each Test Area is set to be working, thus the aims of each Test Areas need to be clearly defined. The RSG mapping works in a quadruple-helix (4H) logic, a conceptual framework that sees innovation at the intersection of the converging interests of: public entities/policy makers, academia/research institutions, business/firms/enterprises/economic actors, civil society/NGOs/citizen organizations. The mapping represents the starting point of the activities in the Test Areas, and aims at kickstarting the evaluation of the state of the art for Smart Transition, the first activity of the RSG. The number of stakeholders to be involved is critically linked to the dimensions and demographics of the Test Area. Ideally, all elements of the quadruple helix should be covered, but the societal, demographical and economical structure of the Test Area influence the distribution of RSG.
    [Show full text]
  • (2015). Stone Narratives: Heritage, Mobility, Performance. University Of
    stone narratives heritage, mobility, performance Edited by Katja Hrobat Virloget, Irena Weber ◆ Daša Fabjan, Andrej Preložnik stone narratives S T O N E N A R R A T I V E S Heritage, mobility, performance Edited by Katja Hrobat Virloget, Irena Weber ◆ Daša Fabjan, Andrej Preložnik koper 2015 Večavtorska znanstvena monografija / A Multiple-Author Scientific Monograph Stone narratives. Heritage, mobility, performance. Urednice in urednik izdaje / Edited by ■ dr. Katja Hrobat Virloget, dr. Irena Weber ■ mag. Daša Fabjan, Andrej Preložnik Recenzenta / Reviewers ■ dr. Aleksandra Brezovec, dr. Jaka Repič Prevod / Translation ■ Anica Jaković, Višnja Morić, Snežana Smolić, Ivka Šimunović Lektoriranje / Proofreading ■ Martina Zajc, Mina Morrgan s.p. Oblikovanje, prelom in priprava za izdajo / Design and typesetting ■ dr. Jonatan Vinkler Fotografija na platnici / Picture on Front Cover■ Rafael Marn, Ad Pirum Izdala in založila / Published by ■ Založba Univerze na Primorskem, Titov trg 4, si-6000 Koper, Koper 2015 Glavni urednik / Editor-in-Chief ■ dr. Jonatan Vinkler Vodja založbe / Managing Editor ■ Alen Ježovnik isbn 978-961-6963-95-4 (http://www.hippocampus.si/isbn/978-961-6963-95-4.pdf) isbn 978-961-6963-96-1 (http://www.hippocampus.si/isbn/978-961-6963-96-1/index.html) isbn 978-961-6963-97-8 (printed version, not for sale) Tisk / Print ■ Grafika 3000, d. o. o., Dob Naklada / Print-run ■ 500 izvodov/copies © 2015 Založba Univerze na Primorskem/University of Primorska Press Publikacija je rezultat projekta KAMEN-MOST - Kamen Krasa, Istre in Kvarnerja – ohranjanje dediščine in ozaveščanje o tradicionalnih tehnikah, pridobivanju in uporabi kamna, ki se je izvajal v okviru Evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja OP Slovenija-Hrvaška 2007-2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities to Reform the System of Municipalities in Slovenia Franc Žohar
    Journal of Universal Excellence, Appendix December 2014, year 3, number 4, pp. A36–A62. Possibilities to reform the system of municipalities in Slovenia 1 Franc Žohar Ministry of the Interior, Service for Local Government [email protected] Introduction The need for reorganization of local government in Slovenia, is not necessary in principle to convince anyone else. However, when you get down to specific issues and solutions, our individual interests and activities to prevent any practical solution and realization. 2 Below we present some experiments obstacles and proposals relating to the reorganization of local government in Slovenia. 1 Territorial reform of municipalities In accordance with the European Charter of Local Self-Government, which states that local self-government denotes the right and the ability of local authorities, within the limits of the law, to regulate and manage a substantial share of public affairs under their own responsibility and in the interests of the local population is the fundamental objective of territorial reforms to achieve that each municipality Slovenian capable of satisfying the needs and interests of their people and meet the tasks in accordance with the law. The Republic of Slovenia has 212 3 municipalities, of which as many as 109 fewer than 5.000 inhabitants, as required by 13.a article of the Law on Local Self- Government (LGA)4 . Reflection of territorial reform stems from the awareness that with relatively simple interventions in the territorial component of Slovenian local self- government, the re- unification of municipalities with municipalities, some of which 1 All statements and views in this article is the opinion of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organization in which he is employed or organizations with which it cooperates.
    [Show full text]
  • Obsega Območja Občin: Idrija, Jesenice, Kamnik, Kranj, Radovljica, Škofja Loka, Tržič
    Uradni list RS, št. 46/92 Z A K O N O DOLOČITVI VOLILNIH ENOT ZA VOLITVE POSLANCEV V DRŽAVNI ZBOR 1. člen Za volitve poslancev v državni zbor se določi deset volilnih enot, v katerih se voli skupno 90 poslancev. 2. člen Za območje Republike Slovenije se določi osem volilnih enot, ki obsegajo območja več sosednjih občin. Za območja občin, kjer živi italijanska oziroma madžarska narodna skupnost, se določita dve posebni volilni enoti, v katerih se voli po en poslanec italijanske oziroma madžarske narodne skupnosti. 3. člen V vsaki volilni enoti iz prvega odstavka prejšnjega člena se določi enajst volilnih okrajev, ki obsegajo območje ene ali dveh občin oziroma dele območij občine. 4. člen Za volitve poslancev v državni zbor se določijo naslednje volilne enote in volilni okraji ter občine, v katerih so sedeži volilnih enot: 1. volilna enota (sedež: Kranj); obsega območja občin: Idrija, Jesenice, Kamnik, Kranj, Radovljica, Škofja Loka, Tržič 1.1) volilni okraj: občina Jesenice, ki obsega območje krajevnih skupnosti: Rateče- Planica, Kranjska Gora, Dovje-Mojstrana, Hrušica, Planina pod Golico, Javornik- Koroška Bela, Sava, Mirka Roglja Petka, Staneta Bokala, Blejska Dobrava, Podmežaklja, Žirovnica, Cirila Tavčarja (sedež: Jesenice); 1.2) volilni okraj: del občine Radovljica, ki obsega območje krajevnih skupnosti: Bohinjska Bistrica, Bohinjska Bela, Koprivnik, Srednja vas v Bohinju, Stara Fužina, Gorje, Zasip, Bled, Ribno (sedež: Radovljica); 1.3) volilni okraj: del občine Radovljica, ki obsega območje krajevnih skupnosti: Kamna Gorica, Begunje
    [Show full text]
  • Odranci, V1 Odranci - SLOVENIA Flood - 13/09/2014 Reference Map - Detail ^ Production Date: 15/09/2014 Burgenland (AT) Slovakia 0 0
    600000 605000 16°16'0"E 16°18'0"E 16°20'0"E 16°22'0"E 16°24'0"E GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-102 Product N.: 02Odranci, v1 Odranci - SLOVENIA Flood - 13/09/2014 Reference Map - Detail ^ Production date: 15/09/2014 Burgenland (AT) Slovakia 0 0 0 0 Steiermark 0 ! 0 Austria 0 0 Vas 6 6 Raab 1 1 Hungary 5 5 Area of Interest - Detail Slovenia Zala, Sio ^ Italy ! Ljubljana Croatia Vzhodna Nyugat-Dunantul Bosnia Slovenija Pomurska Adriatic and Sea Herzegovina Zala (! Odranci Mur ! Podravska Medjimurska zupanija Sjeverozapadna Drau Varazdinska zupanija Hrvatska Del-Dunantul ! Cartographic Information ! Full color ISO A1, medium resolution (200 dpi) ! 1:17000 0 0,25 0,5 1 N km 4 " 0 ' 4 3 ° 6 Grid: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 33N map coordinate system 4 N " Tick marks: WGS 84 geographical coordinate system 0 ' 4 ± 3 ° 6 4 Legend General Information Transportation Hydrology £ Area of Interest " Bridge River Administrative boundaries Canal Primary Road International Boundary Lake Secondary Road Point of Interest Reservoir 4 Educational Local Road River Settlements ! ! Populated Place Residential ! Industrial ! Urbanized Multi-functional ! ! ! ! ! Map Information 0 0 0 0 Heavy precipitation hit North-East part of Slovenia and caused extensive flooding in the 0 0 5 5 region of Prekmurje and Pomurje. Dozens of country roads have also closed due to flooding 5 5 1 ! 1 and landslides. The core users of the maps are Disaster Response Authorities involved in 5 5 operations. "£ Data Sources Inset maps based on: Administrative boundaries (JRC 2013, GISCO 2010, © EuroGeographics), Hydrology, Transportation (Natural Earth, 2012, CCM River DB © EU- JRC 2007), Settlements (Geonames, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Rankings Municipality of Kobarid
    9/30/2021 Maps, analysis and statistics about the resident population Demographic balance, population and familiy trends, age classes and average age, civil status and foreigners Skip Navigation Links SLOVENIA / Zahodna Slovenija / Province of Goriška / Kobarid Powered by Page 1 L'azienda Contatti Login Urbistat on Linkedin Adminstat logo DEMOGRAPHY ECONOMY RANKINGS SEARCH SLOVENIA Municipalities Ajdovščina Stroll up beside >> Kanal Bovec Brda Kobarid Cerkno Miren - Kostanjevica Idrija Nova Gorica Renče - Vogrsko Šempeter - Vrtojba Tolmin Vipava Provinces GORENJSKA OBALNO- KRAŠKA/LITORALE-CARSO GORIŠKA OSREDNJESLOVENSKA Regions Powered by Page 2 Vzhodna Zahodna L'azienda Contatti Login Urbistat on Linkedin Slovenija Slovenija Adminstat logo DEMOGRAPHY ECONOMY RANKINGS SEARCH SLOVENIA Municipality of Kobarid Territorial extension of Municipality of KOBARID and related population density, population per gender and number of households, average age and incidence of foreigners TERRITORY DEMOGRAPHIC DATA (YEAR 2018) Zahodna Region Slovenija Inhabitants (N.) 4,104 Province Goriška Families (N.) 1,679 Sign Province Goriška Males (%) 50.0 Hamlet of the 0 municipality Females (%) 50.0 Surface (Km2) 192.66 Foreigners (%) 2.6 Population density Average age 21.3 44.6 (Inhabitants/Kmq) (years) Average annual variation -0.35 (2014/2018) MALES, FEMALES AND ^ Balance of nature = Births - Deaths FOREIGNERS INCIDENCE ^ Migration balance = Registered - (YEAR 2018) Deleted Rankings Municipality of kobarid is on 54° place among 65 municipalities in region by demographic size Powered by Page 3 is on 119° place among 212 municipalitiesL'azienda in Contatti Login Urbistat on Linkedin SLOVENIA by demographic size Adminstat logo DEMOGRAPHYis on 30° placeECONOMY among 212RANKINGS municipalities in SEARCH SLOVENIA SLOVENIA per average age Fractions Address Contacts Slovenia AdminStat 41124 Via M.
    [Show full text]