Western Weekly Reports
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
WESTERN WEEKLY REPORTS Reports of Cases Decided in the Courts of Western Canada and Certain Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada 2016-VOLUME 4 (Cited [2016] 4 W.W.R.) All cases of value from the courts of Western Canada and appeals therefrom to the Supreme Court of Canada SELECTION EDITOR Walter J. Watson, B.A., LL.B. ASSOCIATE EDITORS (Alberta) E. Mirth, Q.C. (British Columbia) Darrell E. Burns, LL.B., LL.M. (Manitoba) E. Arthur Braid, Q.C. (Saskatchewan) Greg Fingas, B.A., LL.B. EDITORIAL STAFF Cheryl L. McPherson, B.A.(HONS.) Director, Primary Content Operations Audrey Wineberg, B.A.(HONS.), LL.B. Product Development Manager Nicole Ross, B.A., LL.B. Supervisor, Legal Writing Julia Fischer, B.A.(HONS.), LL.B. Supervisor, Legal Writing Lisa Rao, B.SC., LL.B. Senior Legal Writer Donna Dickson Content Editor WESTERN WEEKLY REPORTS is published 48 times per year. Subscrip- Western Weekly Reports est publi´e 48 fois par ann´ee. L’abonnement est de tion rate $451.00 per bound volume including parts. Indexed: Carswell’s In- 451 $ par volume reli´e incluant les fascicules. Indexation: Index a` la docu- dex to Canadian Legal Literature. mentation juridique au Canada de Carswell. Editorial Offices are also located at the following address: 430 rue St. Pierre, Le bureau de la r´edaction est situ´e a` Montr´eal — 430, rue St. Pierre, Mon- Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, H2Y 2M5. tr´eal, Qu´ebec, H2Y 2M5. ________ ________ © 2016 Thomson Reuters Canada Limited © 2016 Thomson Reuters Canada Limit´ee NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: All rights reserved. No part of this publica- MISE EN GARDE ET AVIS D’EXONERATION´ DE RESPON- tion may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any SABILITE´ : Tous droits r´eserv´es. Il est interdit de reproduire, m´emoriser sur form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or un syst`eme d’extraction de donn´ees ou de transmettre, sous quelque forme ou otherwise, without the prior written consent of the publisher (Thomson par quelque moyen que ce soit, electronique´ ou m´ecanique, photocopie, enre- Reuters). gistrement ou autre, tout ou partie de la pr´esente publication, a` moins d’en avoir pr´ealablement obtenu l’autorisation ecrite´ de l’´editeur, Thomson Reuters. A licence, however, is hereby given by the publisher: Cependant, l’´editeur conc`ede, par le pr´esent document, une licence : (a) to a lawyer to make a copy of any part of this publication to give to a a) a` un avocat, pour reproduire quelque partie de cette publication pour judge or other presiding officer or to other parties in making legal submis- remettre a` un juge ou un autre officier-pr´esident ou aux autres parties dans sions in judicial proceedings; une instance judiciaire; b) a` un juge ou un autre officier-pr´esident, pour produire quelque partie de (b) to a judge or other presiding officer to produce any part of this publication cette publication dans une instance judiciaire; ou in judicial proceedings; or c) a` quiconque, pour reproduire quelque partie de cette publication dans le cadre de d´elib´erations parlementaires. (c) to anyone to reproduce any part of this publication for the purposes of « Instance judiciaire » comprend une instance devant une cour, un tribunal ou parliamentary proceedings. une personne ayant l’autorit´e de d´ecider sur toute chose affectant les droits ou les responsabiliti´es d’une personne. “Judicial proceedings” include proceedings before any court, tribunal or per- Ni Thomson Reuters ni aucune des autres personnes ayant particip´e a` la r´eal- son having authority to decide any matter affecting a person’s legal rights or isation et a` la distribution de la pr´esente publication ne fournissent quelque liabilities. garantie que ce soit relativement a` l’exactitude ou au caract`ere actuel de celle-ci. Il est entendu que la pr´esente publication est offerte sous la r´eserve Thomson Reuters and all persons involved in the preparation and sale of this expresse que ni Thomson Reuters, ni le ou les auteurs de cette publication, ni publication disclaim any warranty as to accuracy or currency of the publica- aucune des autres personnes ayant particip´e a` son elaboration´ n’assument tion. This publication is provided on the understanding and basis that none of quelque responsabilit´e que ce soit relativement a` l’exactitude ou au caract`ere Thomson Reuters, the author/s or other persons involved in the creation of actuel de son contenu ou au r´esultat de toute action prise sur la foi de this publication shall be responsible for the accuracy or currency of the con- l’information qu’elle renferme, ou ne peuvent etreˆ tenus responsables de tents, or for the results of any action taken on the basis of the information toute erreur qui pourrait s’y etreˆ gliss´ee ou de toute omission. contained in this publication, or for any errors or omissions contained herein. La participation d’une personne a` la pr´esente publication ne peut en aucun cas etreˆ consid´er´ee comme constituant la formulation, par celle-ci, d’un avis No one involved in this publication is attempting herein to render legal, ac- juridique ou comptable ou de tout autre avis professionnel. Si vous avez counting, or other professional advice. If legal advice or other expert assis- besoin d’un avis juridique ou d’un autre avis professionnel, vous devez tance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. retenir les services d’un avocat ou d’un autre professionnel. Les analyses The analysis contained herein should in no way be construed as being either comprises dans les pr´esentes ne doivent etreˆ interpr´et´ees d’aucune fa¸con official or unofficial policy of any governmental body. comme etant´ des politiques officielles ou non officielles de quelque organ- isme gouvernemental que ce soit. 8 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of 8 Le papier utilis´e dans cette publication satisfait aux exigences minimales American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Pa- de l’American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of per for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. ISSN 0049-7525 ISBN 978-0-7798-7040-0 Printed in Canada by Thomson Reuters THOMSON REUTERS One Corporate Plaza Customer Relations 2075 Kennedy Road Toronto 1-416-609-3800 Toronto, Ontario Elsewhere in Canada/U.S. 1-800-387-5164 M1T 3V4 Fax 1-416-298-5082 www.carswell.com Contact www.carswell.com/email Hyczkewycz v. Hupe 213 [Indexed as: Hyczkewycz v. Hupe] Mary Viola Hyczkewycz (Plaintiff / Respondent) and Paul Hupe (Defendant / Appellant) and Sharon Linda Hupe (Defendant) Manitoba Court of Appeal Docket: AI 15-30-08472 2016 MBCA 23 Richard J. Chartier C.J.M., Holly C. Beard, Christopher J. Mainella JJ.A. Heard: February 10, 2016 Judgment: February 10, 2016 Family law –––– Division of family property — Determination of ownership of property — Application of trust principles — Resulting and constructive trusts — Resulting trusts generally –––– Defendant man and defendant woman were engaged in matrimonial litigation — Plaintiff mother of woman brought action claiming she had beneficial interest in three properties registered in name of one or both defendants on ground of resulting trust — Defendant man brought successful motion for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiff’s claim based on indefeasibility of title provisions of s. 59 of Real Property Act — Master found that s. 59 of Act was absolute bar to any resulting trust claim in Manitoba and struck out statement of claim — Plaintiff’s appeal was allowed — Judge interpreted s. 59 of Real Property Act — Judge found that there was cred- ible evidence that plaintiff might be able to rebut statutory presumption of in- defeasiblity of title under s. 59 of Act at trial — Judge held that defendant man had not established that he had prima facie defence to resulting trust claim — Judge could not conclude that plaintiff’s case was bound to fail — Defendant man appealed — Appeal dismissed — Trial of legal and factual issues was re- quired — There were triable issues as to proper interpretation of s. 59 of Act given approaches in other provinces and case law in Manitoba — There were triable issues as to facts surrounding alleged resulting trusts. Civil practice and procedure –––– Summary judgment — Requirement to show no triable issue –––– Defendant man and defendant woman were engaged in matrimonial litigation — Plaintiff mother of woman brought action claiming she had beneficial interest in properties registered in name of defendants on ground of resulting trust — Defendant man brought successful motion for sum- mary judgment to dismiss plaintiff’s claim — Plaintiff’s appeal was allowed — Judge interpreted s. 59 of Real Property Act — Judge held that defendant man had not established that he had prima facie defence to resulting trust claim — Judge could not conclude that plaintiff’s case was bound to fail — Defendant man appealed — Appeal dismissed — There were triable issues as to proper in- terpretation of s. 59 of Act and as to facts surrounding alleged resulting trusts — 214 WESTERN WEEKLY REPORTS [2016] 4 W.W.R. Judges deciding motions for summary judgment were discouraged from making statements about law, where law was in dispute, if they were referring that same legal issue back for determination by another judge — Making statements as to interpretation of law in case where responsibility would fall to another judge in same case to interpret that same law was unnecessary use of judicial resources and jeopardized judicial comity. Statutes considered: Real Property Act, R.S.M.