All Airports with CY05 Enplanements RO ST Locid City Airport Name Svc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

All Airports with CY05 Enplanements RO ST Locid City Airport Name Svc Source: CY05 ACAIS All Airports with CY05 Enplanements CY 05 CY 04 % RO ST Locid City Airport Name Enplanements Enplanements Rank Hub Change Svc Lvl 63 AL AK ANC Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International P M 2,430,081 2,439,969 -0.41% 129 AL AK FAI Fairbanks Fairbanks International P S 420,597 420,394 0.05% 135 AL AK JNU Juneau Juneau International P S 393,453 377,505 4.22% 200 AL AK BET Bethel Bethel P N 143,670 140,035 2.60% 210 AL AK KTN Ketchikan Ketchikan International P N 110,211 107,141 2.87% 222 AL AK ENA Kenai Kenai Municipal P N 87,924 85,439 2.91% 231 AL AK ADQ Kodiak Kodiak P N 78,128 66,309 17.82% 235 AL AK SIT Sitka Sitka Rocky Gutierrez P N 73,882 76,150 -2.98% 251 AL AK OME Nome Nome P N 60,357 63,725 -5.29% 252 AL AK OTZ Kotzebue Ralph Wien Memorial P N 58,140 58,999 -1.46% 272 AL AK DLG Dillingham Dillingham P N 42,979 46,311 -7.19% 278 AL AK AKN King Salmon King Salmon P N 40,160 39,030 2.90% 283 AL AK HOM Homer Homer P N 38,485 38,744 -0.67% 291 AL AK 5KE Ketchikan Ketchikan Harbor GA No 37,252 49,887 -25.33% 292 AL AK BRW Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial P N 36,740 35,178 4.44% 302 AL AK DUT Unalaska Unalaska P N 30,561 29,733 2.78% 325 AL AK ANI Aniak Aniak P N 23,116 20,660 11.89% 335 AL AK PSG Petersburg Petersburg James A Johnson P N 19,657 18,022 9.07% 336 AL AK CDV Cordova Merle K (Mudhole) Smith P N 19,590 19,454 0.70% 343 AL AK MRI Anchorage Merrill Field P N 17,745 26,504 -33.05% 350 AL AK VDZ Valdez Valdez Pioneer Field P N 15,522 17,613 -11.87% 362 AL AK LHD Anchorage Lake Hood P N 13,727 13,040 5.27% 363 AL AK SCC Deadhorse Deadhorse P N 13,703 14,507 -5.54% 373 AL AK YAK Yakutat Yakutat P N 11,989 12,400 -3.31% 378 AL AK GST Gustavus Gustavus P N 11,579 11,673 -0.81% 382 AL AK ENM Emmonak Emmonak P N 11,271 6,794 65.90% 383 AL AK GAL Galena Edward G. Pitka Sr P N 11,261 12,667 -11.10% 388 AL AK WRG Wrangell Wrangell P N 10,740 10,106 6.27% 397 AL AK UNK Unalakleet Unalakleet P N 10,224 9,600 6.50% 404 AL AK HNH Hoonah Hoonah CS No 9,499 10,832 -12.31% 406 AL AK SGY Skagway Skagway CS No 9,385 9,520 -1.42% 407 AL AK SOV Seldovia Seldovia CS No 9,292 9,968 -6.78% 412 AL AK FYU Fort Yukon Fort Yukon CS No 8,964 9,523 -5.87% 413 AL AK CDB Cold Bay Cold Bay CS No 8,661 8,800 -1.58% 415 AL AK KSM St Mary's St Mary's CS No 8,262 9,931 -16.81% 421 AL AK HNS Haines Haines CS No 8,054 7,940 1.44% 422 AL AK DGG Red Dog Mine Red Dog GA No 7,968 7,155 11.36% 423 AL AK ILI Iliamna Iliamna CS No 7,947 8,531 -6.85% 433 AL AK AQH Quinhagak Quinhagak CS No 7,249 5,994 20.94% 442 AL AK HPB Hooper Bay Hooper Bay CS No 6,380 6,213 2.69% 445 AL AK IIK Kipnuk Kipnuk CS No 6,100 6,122 -0.36% 449 AL AK WLK Selawik Selawik CS No 5,842 6,035 -3.20% 451 AL AK EIL Fairbanks Eielson AFB GA No 5,656 552 924.64% 452 AL AK MOU Mountain Village Mountain Village CS No 5,599 5,646 -0.83% 455 AL AK D76 Noorvik Robert /Bob/ Curtis Memorial CS No 5,390 5,310 1.51% 460 AL AK MBA Manokotak Manokotak CS No 5,194 8,559 -39.32% 462 AL AK MCG McGrath McGrath CS No 5,141 5,172 -0.60% 464 AL AK VAK Chevak Chevak CS No 5,021 5,330 -5.80% 467 AL AK OOK Toksook Bay Toksook Bay CS No 4,952 5,173 -4.27% 469 AL AK WTK Noatak Noatak CS No 4,859 5,001 -2.84% 472 AL AK SVA Savoonga Savoonga CS No 4,637 4,731 -1.99% 476 AL AK PHO Point Hope Point Hope CS No 4,580 4,407 3.93% 478 AL AK BLG Beluga Beluga GA No 4,407 3,450 27.74% 479 AL AK SHH Shishmaref Shishmaref CS No 4,395 4,603 -4.52% 481 AL AK GAM Gambell Gambell CS No 4,360 4,723 -7.69% 483 AL AK SCM Scammon Bay Scammon Bay CS No 4,149 3,801 9.16% Source: CY05 ACAIS All Airports with CY05 Enplanements CY 05 CY 04 % RO ST Locid City Airport Name Enplanements Enplanements Rank Hub Change Svc Lvl 484 AL AK BVK Buckland Buckland CS No 4,117 4,029 2.18% 485 AL AK KLG Kalskag Kalskag CS No 4,105 4,662 -11.95% 486 AL AK SDP Sand Point Sand Point CS No 4,090 4,055 0.86% 487 AL AK AWI Wainwright Wainwright CS No 4,049 3,631 11.51% 489 AL AK 2A9 Kotlik Kotlik CS No 4,030 4,106 -1.85% 494 AL AK AQT Nuiqsut Nuiqsut CS No 3,954 4,408 -10.30% 496 AL AK BTI Kaktovik Barter Island LRRS CS No 3,867 3,590 7.72% 498 AL AK KVL Kivalina Kivalina CS No 3,821 3,591 6.40% 499 AL AK MTM Metlakatla Metlakatla CS No 3,821 5,018 -23.85% 500 AL AK IAN Kiana Bob Baker Memorial CS No 3,740 3,570 4.76% 501 AL AK GGV Kwigillingok Kwigillingok CS No 3,708 3,412 8.68% 502 AL AK A61 Tuntutuliak Tuntutuliak CS No 3,684 3,819 -3.53% 504 AL AK DUY Kongiganak Kongiganak CS No 3,636 3,630 0.17% 505 AL AK TYE Tyonek Tyonek GA No 3,631 3,520 3.15% 508 AL AK 0AK Pilot Station Pilot Station CS No 3,582 4,033 -11.18% 509 AL AK CFK Chefornak Chefornak CS No 3,519 3,175 10.83% 510 AL AK Z09 Kasigluk Kasigluk CS No 3,502 2,920 19.93% 511 AL AK TAL Tanana Ralph M Calhoun Memorial CS No 3,433 3,438 -0.15% 513 AL AK NUL Nulato Nulato CS No 3,359 3,800 -11.61% 515 AL AK SNP Saint Paul Island St Paul Island CS No 3,325 3,049 9.05% 517 AL AK 5Z9 Katmai National PaLake Brooks GA No 3,313 4,529 -26.85% 520 AL AK AKP Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass CS No 3,289 2,807 17.17% 521 AL AK KKA Koyuk Koyuk Alfred Adams CS No 3,236 2,753 17.54% 523 AL AK AUK Alakanuk Alakanuk CS No 3,109 3,955 -21.39% 524 AL AK CGA Craig Craig CS No 3,088 3,931 -21.44% 525 AL AK EEK Eek Eek CS No 3,083 2,863 7.68% 528 AL AK HLA Huslia Huslia CS No 3,072 3,333 -7.83% 529 AL AK ATK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial CS No 3,064 2,774 10.45% 530 AL AK TLT Tuluksak Tuluksak CS No 3,061 2,948 3.83% 531 AL AK PGM Port Graham Port Graham CS No 3,047 3,437 -11.35% 532 AL AK ELI Elim Elim CS No 3,023 2,633 14.81% 534 AL AK KVC King Cove King Cove CS No 2,949 2,908 1.41% 535 AL AK KEB English Bay English Bay CS No 2,943 3,397 -13.36% 541 AL AK KWT Kwethluk Kwethluk CS No 2,796 2,506 11.57% 542 AL AK WBB Stebbins Stebbins CS No 2,793 2,890 -3.36% 543 AL AK 16A Nunapitchuk Nunapitchuk CS No 2,777 2,550 8.90% 544 AL AK MDM Marshall Marshall Don Hunter Sr CS No 2,749 3,298 -16.65% 545 AL AK T44 Kodiak Trident Basin CS No 2,730 2,069 31.95% 546 AL AK RSH Russian Mission Russian Mission CS No 2,708 2,888 -6.23% 550 AL AK 2C7 Shaktoolik Shaktoolik CS No 2,601 2,149 21.03% 551 AL AK AKI Akiak Akiak CS No 2,587 2,014 28.45% 552 AL AK 2A3 Larsen Bay Larsen Bay CS No 2,581 2,224 16.05% 554 AL AK Z13 Akiachak Akiachak CS No 2,530 2,103 20.30% 557 AL AK KAL Kaltag Kaltag GA No 2,452 2,578 -4.89% 558 AL AK KTS Brevig Mission Brevig Mission GA No 2,449 2,239 9.38% 561 AL AK TPO Port Alsworth Port Alsworth GA No 2,420 2,288 5.77% 565 AL AK AGN Angoon Angoon GA No 2,307 2,408 -4.19% 567 AL AK SMK St Michael St Michael GA No 2,304 2,234 3.13% 568 AL AK 6A8 Allakaket Allakaket GA No 2,298 2,200 4.45% 569 AL AK KAE Kake Kake GA No 2,270 2,548 -10.91% 571 AL AK 6R7 Old Harbor Old Harbor GA No 2,266 1,635 38.59% 572 AL AK N93 Golovin Golovin GA No 2,242 2,409 -6.93% 574 AL AK 4A2 Atmautluak Atmautluak GA No 2,204 2,022 9.00% 580 AL AK TOG Togiak Village Togiak GA No 2,137 2,683 -20.35% 581 AL AK EWU Newtok Newtok GA No 2,136 2,154 -0.84% 583 AL AK WMO White Mountain White Mountain GA No 2,123 2,125 -0.09% Source: CY05 ACAIS All Airports with CY05 Enplanements CY 05 CY 04 % RO ST Locid City Airport Name Enplanements Enplanements Rank Hub Change Svc Lvl 586 AL AK HCA Holy Cross Holy Cross GA No 2,093 2,263 -7.51% 588 AL AK RBY Ruby Ruby GA No 2,076 2,052 1.17% 589 AL AK EDF Anchorage Elmendorf AFB GA No 2,072 972 113.17% 590 AL AK 4KA Tununak Tununak GA No 2,066 2,085 -0.91% 592 AL AK KQA Akutan Akutan GA No 2,044 2,123 -3.72% 594 AL AK SHG Shungnak Shungnak GA No 2,015 1,989 1.31% 595 AL AK UUO Willow Willow GA No 2,000 902 121.73% 597 AL AK AFM Ambler Ambler GA No 1,988 2,330 -14.68% 600 AL AK PIZ Point Lay Point Lay LRRS GA No 1,943 1,702 14.16% 602 AL AK ORI Port Lions Port Lions GA No 1,907 1,383 37.89% 606 AL AK VEE Venetie Venetie GA No 1,863 2,252 -17.27% 607 AL AK MYU Mekoryuk Mekoryuk GA No 1,860 2,074 -10.32% 608 AL AK DEE Deering Deering GA No 1,828 1,667 9.66% 609 AL AK KTB Thorne Bay Thorne Bay GA No 1,828 2,761 -33.79% 615 AL AK 4K5 Ouzinkie Ouzinkie GA No 1,684 1,287 30.85% 616 AL AK IGT Nightmute Nightmute GA No 1,664 1,660 0.24% 620 AL AK TER Teller Teller GA No 1,644 1,388 18.44% 624 AL AK BTT Bettles Bettles GA No 1,615 1,581 2.15% 625 AL AK ARC Arctic Village Arctic Village GA No 1,613 1,596 1.07% 631 AL AK SHX Shageluk Shageluk GA No 1,499 1,408 6.46% 632 AL AK KWF Waterfall Waterfall GA No 1,498 1,658 -9.65% 636 AL AK IWK Wales Wales GA No 1,461 1,697 -13.91% 637 AL AK WNA Napakiak Napakiak GA No 1,454 1,611 -9.75% 639 AL AK KGX Grayling Grayling GA No 1,418 1,629 -12.95% 642 AL AK PKA Napaskiak Napaskiak GA No 1,386 1,005 37.91% 646 AL AK EII Egegik Egegik GA No 1,352 1,326 1.96% 648 AL AK HYL Hollis Hollis GA No 1,346 1,691 -20.40% 650 AL AK GNU Goodnews Goodnews GA No 1,325 1,344 -1.41% 654 AL AK 5NN Nondalton Nondalton GA No 1,304 2,037 -35.98% 657 AL AK FSP Nikolai Nikolai GA No 1,283 488 162.91% 658 AL AK 5AK0 Trading Bay Trading Bay Production GA No 1,269 101 ####### 659 AL AK EAA Eagle Eagle GA No 1,265 726 74.24% 660 AL AK ADK Adak (Naval) Stati Adak GA No 1,262 1,650 -23.52% 662 AL AK OBU Kobuk Kobuk GA No 1,256 1,244 0.96% 664 AL AK GBH Galbraith Lake Galbraith Lake GA No 1,229 1,094 12.34% 667 AL AK SXP Sheldon Point Sheldon Point GA No 1,212 1,364 -11.14% 668 AL AK TKE Tenakee Springs Tenakee GA No 1,197 1,104 8.42% 669 AL AK HUS Hughes Hughes GA No 1,188 999 18.92% 670 AL AK ANV Anvik Anvik GA No 1,179 1,322 -10.82% 671 AL AK 9K2 Kokhanok Kokhanok GA No 1,167 1,845 -36.75% 672 AL AK AKK Akhiok Akhiok GA No 1,153 892 29.26% 673 AL AK AJC Chignik Chignik
Recommended publications
  • Failing Malls: Optimizing Opportunities for Housing a Research Report from the National Center June 2021 for Sustainable Transportation
    Failing Malls: Optimizing Opportunities for Housing A Research Report from the National Center June 2021 for Sustainable Transportation Hilda Blanco, University of Southern California TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. NCST-USC-RR-21-09 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Failing Malls: Optimizing Opportunities for Housing June 2021 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Hilda J. Blanco, Ph.D., http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7454-9096 N/A 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Southern California N/A METRANS Transportation Consortium 11. Contract or Grant No. University Park Campus, VKC 367 MC:0626 Caltrans 65A0686 Task Order 021 Los Angeles, California 90089-0626 USDOT Grant 69A3551747114 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report (November 2019 – March Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology 2021) 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code USDOT OST-R California Department of Transportation Division of Research, Innovation and System Information, MS-83 1727 30th Street, Sacramento, CA 95816 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: https://doi.org/10.7922/G2WM1BQH 16. Abstract California, like most of the country, was facing a transformation in retail before the COVID-19 epidemic. Increasing Internet shopping have ushered the closing of anchor stores, such as Macy's, Sears, as well as the closure of many regional shopping malls, which have sizable footprints, ranging from 40-100+ acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Competition Plan Final Report
    Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 Final Report Airline Competition Plan Philadelphia International Airport Prepared for Federal Aviation Administration in compliance with requirements of AIR21 Prepared by City of Philadelphia Division of Aviation Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 31, 2000 SUMMARY S-1 Summary AIRLINE COMPETITION PLAN Philadelphia International Airport The City of Philadelphia, owner and operator of Philadelphia International Airport, is required to submit annually to the Federal Aviation Administration an airline competition plan. The City’s plan for 2000, as documented in the accompanying report, provides information regarding the availability of passenger terminal facilities, the use of passenger facility charge (PFC) revenues to fund terminal facilities, airline leasing arrangements, patterns of airline service, and average airfares for passengers originating their journeys at the Airport. The plan also sets forth the City’s current and planned initiatives to encourage competitive airline service at the Airport, construct terminal facilities needed to accommodate additional airline service, and ensure that access is provided to airlines wishing to serve the Airport on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms. These initiatives are summarized in the following paragraphs. Encourage New Airline Service Airlines that have recently started scheduled domestic service at Philadelphia International Airport include AirTran Airways, America West Airlines, American Trans Air, Midway Airlines, Midwest Express Airlines, and National Airlines. Airlines that have recently started scheduled international service at the Airport include Air France and Lufthansa. The City intends to continue its programs to encourage airlines to begin or increase service at the Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Approve Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC
    DRAFT Agenda Item 3 AGENDA STAFF REPORT ASR Control 20-00 l 077 MEETING DATE: 01 /1 2/21 LEGAL ENTITY TAKING ACTION: Board ofSupervisors BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DISTRICT(S): 2 SUBMITTING AGENCY/DEPARTMENT: John Wayne Airport (Approved) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON(S): Barry A. Rondinella (949) 252-5183 Dave Pfeiffer (949) 252-5291 SUBJECT: Approve Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC CEO CONCUR COUNTY COUNSEL REVIEW CLERK OF THE BOARD Concur Approved Agreement to Form Discussion 4/5 Vote Budgeted: Yes Current Year Cost: NI A Annual Cost: NIA Staffing Impact: No # of Positions: Sole Source: No Current Fiscal Year Revenue: $614,681 Funding Source: Airport Operating Fund 280: 100% County Audit in last 3 years: No Prior Board Action: 11/03/2020 #6 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Approve and execute the Certificated Passenger Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC, for a term effective February 1, 2021, through December 31, 2025. 2. Authorize John Wayne Airport to allocate three Regulated Class A Average Daily Departures and seat capacity, effective February I, 2021, through December 31, 2025, consistent with the terms of the Phase 2 Commercial Airline Access Plan and Regulation. 3. Authorize the Airport Director or designee to make minor modifications and amendments to the lease that do not materially alter the terms or financial obligations to the County and perform all activities specified under the terms ofthe lease. SUMMARY: Approval of the Certificated Passenger Airline Lease between the County of Orange and Allegiant Air LLC and approval of the allocation of operating capacity will allow Allegiant Air LLC, a new carrier from the commercial air carrier new entrant waiting list, to initiate operations at John Wayne Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • John Wayne Airport Orange County Sensitivity HIGH KSNA Santa Ana, California, United States Level
    NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise John Wayne Airport Orange County Sensitivity HIGH KSNA Santa Ana, California, United States Level: Diagram #1: Noise Monitor map and noise sensitive areas © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 1 of 5 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 08:42 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KSNA NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise John Wayne Airport Orange County Sensitivity HIGH KSNA Santa Ana, California, United States Level: Diagram #2: © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 2 of 5 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 08:42 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KSNA NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise John Wayne Airport Orange County Sensitivity HIGH KSNA Santa Ana, California, United States Level: Diagram #3: © Whispertrack™ 2009-2021. All rights reserved. p. 3 of 5 Generated 30 Sep 2021 at 08:42 UTC http://whispertrack.com/airports/KSNA NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES by Whispertrack Noise John Wayne Airport Orange County Sensitivity HIGH KSNA Santa Ana, California, United States Level: OVERVIEW John Wayne Airport (SNA) is one of the busiest and most noise sensitive airports in the United States. The Airport is located in the center of Orange County, California with residential areas in close proximity. To mitigate potential noise impacts from aircraft operations and to enhance compatibility with surrounding communities, the Airport maintains some of the most stringent noise rules in the United States. The General Aviation Noise Ordinance (GANO) has been adopted by the County of Orange to regulate the hours of operation and the maximum permitted noise levels associated with general aviation operations. This information has been prepared to introduce you to the GANO and to encourage the operation of your aircraft in the quietest manner possible consistent with safety.
    [Show full text]
  • CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
    CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Study 2014
    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inspection and Discovery of State Records in Alaska
    INSPECTION AND DISCOVERY OF STATE RECORDS IN ALASKA MARGOT 0. KNUTH* I. INTRODUCTION Attempts to inspect the records of the State of Alaska can be frus- trating for the public, the press, and government officials because of the uncertainty in Alaska as to what records are available for inspec- tion. This frustration arises because Alaska, unlike most states and the federal government,' does not have a comprehensive public records act that clearly identifies what records are exempt from disclo- sure. Instead, Alaska Statutes sections 09.25.110 and 09.25.1202 spec- ify that all public writings and records, with a few noted exceptions, are available for inspection. In contrast, evidentiary privileges in Alaska are relatively straightforward. There is, however, one constitutional privilege that has just been recognized in Alaska and is deserving of close scrutiny. That privilege, the "deliberative process privilege," protects from dis- covery "predecisional" documents prepared by members of the execu- tive branch that reflect the decisionmaking, or deliberative process, of government officials. 3 Exemptions under the records inspection statutes are quite dis- tinct from evidentiary privileges. A record that is exempt from disclo- sure under the public records statutes is not necessarily privileged Copyright @ 1987 by Alaska Law Review * Assistant District Attorney, First Judicial District, Juneau, Alaska; Former Assistant Attorney General, State of Alaska; J.D., Loyola Law School, 1980; B.A., University of California at Los Angeles, 1977. 1. See infra note 45 and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1982). 2. ALASKA STAT. §§ 09.25.110, 09.25.120 (1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Adopting and Amending County Charters
    Adopting and Amending County Charters JAMES A. COON LOCAL GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL SERIES A Division of the New York Department of State Kathy Hochul, Governor Rossana Rosado, Secretary of State NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 99 WASHINGTON AVENUE ALBANY, NEW YORK 12231-0001 http://www.dos.ny.gov Revised 2009 Reprint September 2021 Introduction In 1926, Governor Alfred E. Smith proposed a major restructuring of New York’s counties “. for reasons of economy and efficiency.” Although his proposal went unheeded, the counties of today resemble those of the 1920’s in little more than name and geographical area. County government has undergone profound changes in both form and function. These changes have transformed them from instrumentalities existing largely for state purposes to true units of local government endowed with their own powers to carry out an extensive array of new duties and service responsibilities. One of the most important changes was the power, extended by the County Charter Law, to reorganize and shape county government organizations and operational arrangements to fit local needs and preferences.1 What the counties may do under this law and how they may go about doing it most effectively form the substance of this publication. The residents of 19 of the State’s counties have chosen to reorganize their county governments under charters. Four of these counties – Nassau, Monroe, Westchester and Suffolk – were initially organized through a different process than the remaining 15 counties, of whose residents drafted and adopted their own charters by utilizing their home rule powers. While the most populous counties were first to adopt and implement charters, medium-size and smaller counties are becoming increasingly interested in exploring home rule charter possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • November 29, 2017 the Honorable
    November 29, 2017 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Charles Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate U.S. Capitol Building, Room: S-230 Hart Senate Office Building, Room: 322 Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Paul D. Ryan The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker Democratic Leader United States House of Representatives United States House of Representatives U.S. Capitol Building, Room: H-232 U.S. Capitol Building, Room: H-204 Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Majority Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Schumer, Speaker Ryan, and Minority Leader Pelosi, With 2017 quickly nearing an end, we ask that you uphold the federal commitment to local communities with significant percentages of federal land within our jurisdictions by fully funding the Payments In Lieu of Taxes program (PILT) for FY 2018, and reauthorizing the Secure Rural Schools program (SRS) until a permanent solution is developed. Sixty-two percent of counties in 49 states nationwide have untaxable federal land within our boundaries, and are required to provide critical services to residents and public lands visitors including search and rescue services, emergency management, law enforcement and education. Payments In Lieu of Taxes Nearly 1,900 counties, boroughs and parishes in 49 states rely on PILT to make up for lost property tax revenue from untaxable federal public lands. In FY 2017, Congress appropriated $465 million to fully fund PILT, which local governments greatly appreciated. Unless Congress guarantees full funding for PILT for FY 2018, local governments will not be able to provide public services such as emergency management, law enforcement, education, healthcare and road maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma Skypark News December 2017
    SONOMA SKYPARK NEWS DECEMBER 2017 SKYPARK CHRISTMAS PARTY- This last Friday night a little over 100 Skyparkian’s celebrated the beginning of the Christmas season with warm greetings, beverages, good food, music, and a gift exchange. Darrel Jones and Kathy Carmichael organized lots of volunteers. Many of us decorated hangar, A-3, Thursday afternoon. I want to especially thank Marilyn & Bob Avrit for the outstanding table decorations. The airport supplied drinks and the roasted turkey and ham. Richard Craig & Sandra Hoke carved and served the turkey & ham. Marci Fahraji supervised the kitchen volunteers and generally filled in where ever she was needed. Thanks to all the attendees who brought appetizers, main dishes, salads and desserts. The party goers were very generous with their contributions to the Toys-for-Tots gift boxes, filling them to over flow!! I wish you all a Happy Holiday Season. AIRPORT HAPPENINGS Long time Skypark pilot and hangar owner Herman Bauer sold his Mooney last year and last month he sold hangar M-1 to Eric Presten. Eric sold his hangar L-2 to Skypark pilot Michel Oltramare. Skypark is welcoming new hangar owners Jonathan Clark & Lee Schaller to the airport. Jonathan bought my hangar A-3 for his Cirrus and will continue renting some space. Lee bought Jack Strehl’s hangar M-3 and will continue renting to the pilots presently in the hangar. Ken Thornton purchased a Piper Clipper recently and is learning to fly in it with Richard Craig as his instructor. This last Tuesday Ken received some unplanned cross-wind instruction when he and Richard returned to Skypark just after the big wind started.
    [Show full text]
  • MONDAY, MARCH 25, 2013 3519 Representative Hall, Atlanta
    MONDAY, MARCH 25, 2013 3519 Representative Hall, Atlanta, Georgia Monday, March 25, 2013 Thirty-Eighth Legislative Day The House met pursuant to adjournment at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., this day and was called to order by the Speaker. The roll was called and the following Representatives answered to their names: Abrams Cooke Hamilton McCall Smith, E Alexander Coomer Harbin Meadows Smith, L Allison Cooper Harden Mitchell E Smith, M Anderson E Dawkins-Haigler Harrell E Morris Smith, R Atwood Deffenbaugh Hatchett E Murphy Spencer Ballinger Dempsey Hawkins Neal Stephens, M Barr Dickerson E Henson Nimmer Stephens, R Battles Dickey Hightower Nix Stovall E Beasley-Teague Dickson Hill O'Neal Stover Bennett Douglas Hitchens Parrish Strickland E Bentley Drenner Holcomb Parsons Talton E Benton Dudgeon Holmes E Peake Tankersley Black E Dukes Holt Pezold Tanner Braddock E Dunahoo Houston Powell, J Taylor, D Broadrick Duncan Hugley Pruett Taylor, T Brockway Ehrhart Jackson Quick Teasley Brooks England Jasperse Ramsey Thomas, A.M. Bruce E Epps, C Jones, J Randall Thomas, B Bryant Epps, J Jones, S Rice Turner Buckner E Evans Kaiser Riley Waites Burns Fleming Kelley Roberts Watson, B Caldwell, J Fludd Kendrick Rogers, C Watson, S Caldwell, M Frye Kidd Rogers, T Welch Carson Gardner Kirby Rutledge Weldon Carter Gasaway Knight Rynders Wilkinson Chandler Geisinger Lindsey Scott Willard Channell Glanton Lumsden E Setzler Williams, A Chapman Golick E Mabra Sharper Williams, C Cheokas Gordon Marin Shaw Williams, E Clark, J Gravley Martin Sheldon Williamson Clark, V Greene Maxwell Sims, B Yates Coleman Gregory Mayo E Sims, C Ralston, Speaker The following members were off the floor of the House when the roll was called: Representatives Bell of the 58th, Beverly of the 143rd, Casas of the 107th, Dollar of the 45th, Floyd of the 99th, Frazier of the 126th, Fullerton of the 153rd, Howard of the 124th, Jordan of the 77th, Morgan of the 39th, Mosby of the 83rd, Oliver of the 82nd, Pak of the 108th, Powell of the 32nd, Smyre of the 135th, and Stephenson of the 90th.
    [Show full text]