DOCSLIB.ORG

BABAR AHMAD and OTHERS V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BABAR AHMAD and OTHERS V FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 10 April 2012 FINAL 24/09/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Lech Garlicki, President, David Thór Björgvinsson, Nicolas Bratza, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vučinić, judges, and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 20 March 2012, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in five applications (nos. 24027/07, 11949/08 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). 2. The first application was lodged on 10 June 2007 by two British nationals, Mr Babar Ahmad (“the first applicant”) and Mr Haroon Rashid Aswat (“the second applicant”). They were both born in 1974. The second application was lodged on 5 March 2008 by Mr Syed Tahla Ahsan (“the third applicant”), who is also a British national. He was born in 1979. The third application was lodged on 1 August 2008 by Mr Mustafa Kamal Mustafa, known more commonly as Abu Hamza (“the fourth applicant”). He is a British national, who was born in 1958. The fourth application was lodged on 21 December 2009 by Mr Adel Abdul Bary (“the fifth applicant”). He is an Egyptian national who was born in 1960. The fifth application was lodged on 22 December 2009 by Mr Khaled Al-Fawwaz (“the sixth applicant”). He is a Saudi Arabian national who was born in 1962. 3. The first, second, third and fifth applicants were represented by Ms G. Peirce, a lawyer practising in London with Birnberg Peirce & Partners, assisted by Mr B. Cooper, counsel. The fourth applicant was represented by Ms M. Arani, a lawyer practising in Middlesex, assisted by Mr A. Jones QC and Mr B. Brandon, counsel. The sixth applicant was represented by Mr A. Raja, a lawyer practising in London with Quist 2 BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT Solicitors, assisted by Mr J. Jones, counsel. The Government were represented by their Agent, Mr D. Walton of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 4. The applicants, who are the subject of extradition requests made by the United States of America, alleged in particular that, if extradited and convicted in the United States, they would be at real risk of ill-treatment either as a result of conditions of detention at ADX Florence (which would be made worse by the imposition of “special administrative measures”) or by the length of their possible sentences. 5. On 6 July 2010 the Court delivered its admissibility decision in respect of the first four applicants. It declared admissible the first, second and third applicants’ complaints concerning detention at ADX Florence and the imposition of special administrative measures post-trial. It declared the fourth applicant’s complaint in respect of ADX Florence inadmissible, finding that, as a result of his medical conditions (see paragraph 37 below), there was no real risk of his spending anything more than a short period of time at ADX Florence. The Court also declared admissible all four applicants’ complaints concerning the length of their possible sentences. It declared inadmissible the remainder of the applicants’ complaints. Finally, the Court decided to continue to indicate to the Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that it was desirable in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings that the applicants should not be extradited until further notice. 6. On 3 September 2010, the President of the Chamber decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the fifth and sixth applicants’ cases should be given to the Government of the United Kingdom. It was further decided that the Rule 39 indications made in respect of these applicants should also remain in place until further notice. 7. Further to the Court’s admissibility decision of 6 July 2010 and the President’s decision of 3 September 2010, all six applicants and the Government filed observations (Rules 54 § 2 (b) and 59 § 1). In addition, third-party comments were received from the non-governmental organisations the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Litigation Project at Yale Law School, Interights and Reprieve, which had been given leave by the President of the Chamber to intervene in the written procedure (Article 36 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 2). The parties replied to those comments (Rule 44 § 5). BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT 3 THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASES A. The United States indictments 8. The applicants have been indicted on various charges of terrorism in the United States of America. They are the subject of three separate sets of criminal proceedings in the United States federal courts. The first set concerns the first applicant, Mr Ahmad, and the third applicant, Mr Ahsan. The second set of proceedings concerns the second applicant, Mr Aswat, and the fourth applicant, Abu Hamza. The third set of proceedings concerns the fifth applicant, Mr Bary, and the sixth applicant, Mr Al Fawwaz. 9. The details of each indictment are set out below. On the basis of each indictment, the United States Government requested each applicant’s extradition from the United Kingdom. Each applicant then contested his proposed extradition in separate proceedings in the English courts. 1. The indictment concerning the first and third applicants 10. The indictment against the first applicant was returned by a Federal Grand Jury sitting in Connecticut on 6 October 2004. It alleges the commission of four felonies between 1997 and August 2004: conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists; providing material support to terrorists; conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country; and money laundering. On 28 June 2006, a similar indictment was returned against the third applicant, save that the charge of money laundering was not included. For both indictments, the material support is alleged to have been provided through a series of websites, one of whose servers was based in Connecticut. The charge of conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country is based on two allegations: first, that the websites exhorted Muslims to travel to Chechnya and Afghanistan to defend those places; and second, that classified US Navy plans relating to a US naval battle group operating in the Straits of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf had been sent to the website. The plans are alleged to have discussed the battle group’s vulnerability to terrorist attack. 2. The indictment concerning the second and fourth applicants 11. The indictment against the fourth applicant was returned on 19 April 2004 by a Federal Grand Jury sitting in the Southern District of New York. It charges him with eleven different counts of criminal conduct. These cover three sets of facts. 4 BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT 12. The first group of charges relates to the taking of sixteen hostages in Yemen in December 1998, four of whom died during a rescue mission conducted by Yemeni forces. The indictment charges the fourth applicant with conspiracy to take hostages and hostage taking and relates principally to his contact with the leader of the hostage takers, Abu Al-Hassan, before and during the events in question. 13. The second group of charges relates to the conduct of violent jihad in Afghanistan in 2001. The indictment alleges that the fourth applicant provided material and financial assistance to his followers and arranged for them to meet Taliban commanders in Afghanistan. In this respect, four counts of the indictment charge him with providing and concealing material support and resources to terrorists and a foreign terrorist organisation and conspiracy thereto. A further count charges him with conspiracy to supply goods and services to the Taliban. 14. The third group of charges relates to a conspiracy to establish a jihad training camp in Bly, Oregon between June 2000 and December 2001. Two counts charge the fourth applicant with providing and concealing material support and resources to terrorists and providing material support and resources to a foreign terrorist organisation (Al Qaeda); a further two counts charge him with conspiracy to the main two counts. 15. On 12 September 2005, a superseding indictment was returned which named and indicted the second applicant as the fourth applicant’s alleged co-conspirator in respect of the Bly, Oregon charges (thus charging the second applicant with the same four counts as those faced by the fourth applicant in respect of the Bly, Oregon conspiracy). On 6 February 2006 a second superseding indictment was returned, which indicted a third man, Oussama Abdullah Kassir, as a co-conspirator in respect of the Bly, Oregon charges. 16. Mr Kassir was extradited to the United States from the Czech Republic in September 2007. On 12 May 2009, Mr Kassir was convicted on five counts relating to the Bly, Oregon jihad camp conspiracy. He was also convicted of a further six counts relating to the operation of terrorist websites. On 15 September 2009, after submissions from Mr Kassir and his defence counsel, the trial judge sentenced Mr Kassir to the maximum permissible sentence on each count.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 4258, 19 June 2015 By Cheryl Pilbeam The Wilson Doctrine Pat Strickland Inside: 1. Introduction 2. Historical background 3. The Wilson doctrine 4. Prison surveillance 5. Damian Green 6. The NSA files and metadata 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 4258, 19 June 2015 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. Historical background 4 3. The Wilson doctrine 5 3.1 Criticism of the Wilson doctrine 6 4. Prison surveillance 9 4.1 Alleged events at Woodhill prison 9 4.2 Recording of prisoner’s telephone calls – 2006-2012 10 5. Damian Green 12 6. The NSA files and metadata 13 6.1 Prism 13 6.2 Tempora and metadata 14 Legal challenges 14 7. Labour MPs: police monitoring 15 Cover page image copyright: Chamber-070 by UK Parliament image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped 3 The Wilson Doctrine Summary The convention that MPs’ communications should not be intercepted by police or security services is known as the ‘Wilson Doctrine’. It is named after the former Prime Minister Harold Wilson who established the rule in 1966. According to the Times on 18 November 1966, some MPs were concerned that the security services were tapping their telephones. In November 1966, in response to a number of parliamentary questions, Harold Wilson made a statement in the House of Commons saying that MPs phones would not be tapped. More recently, successive Interception of Communications Commissioners have recommended that the forty year convention which has banned the interception of MPs’ communications should be lifted, on the grounds that legislation governing interception has been introduced since 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court Judgment Template
    Case No: CO/5160/2014 Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 2354 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 07/08/2015 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CRANSTON - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: THE COMMISSIONER OF THE POLICE OF THE Claimant METROPOLIS - and - SYED TALHA AHSAN Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr Tom Little (instructed by the Metropolitan Police Legal Service) for the Claimant Mr Daniel Squires (instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 24/07/2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Judgmen tMr Justice Cranston: Introduction: 1. This is an application by the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (“the Commissioner”) for an order to impose notification requirements for a period of 15 years on Syed Talha Ahsan (“Mr Ahsan”) under the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 (“the 2008 Act”). In 2013, he was convicted in the United States of conspiracy to provide material assistance for terrorism through his involvement in a website. He has now returned to the United Kingdom. The notification order will require him for that period to attend police stations to provide, and update, information about his living arrangements and to provide details about his travel plans, for which permission can be refused. Breach of the requirements is punishable with imprisonment of up to 5 years. 2. Notification requirements have been imposed in many cases when persons have been convicted in the UK of terrorist-related offences. This is the first case in which a notification order has been contested in respect of a person convicted outside the UK of a corresponding foreign offence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Intelligence Collection Ross W. Bellaby
    What’s the Harm? The Ethics of Intelligence Collection Ross W. Bellaby Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University June 13th, 2011 DECLARATION This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Signed ...................................................................... (Ross W. Bellaby) Date ........................................................................ STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signed ..................................................................... (Ross W. Bellaby) Date ........................................................................ [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter- library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed ..................................................................... (Ross W. Bellaby) Date ........................................................................ I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying
    [Show full text]
  • Translator, Traitor: a Critical Ethnography of a U.S
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2014 Translator, traitor: A critical ethnography of a U.S. terrorism trial Maya Hess Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/226 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] TRANSLATOR, TRAITOR: A CRITICAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF A U.S. TERRORISM TRIAL by MAYA HESS A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Criminal Justice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ii © 2014 MAYA HESS All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Criminal Justice in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Diana Gordon ______________________ _____________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Deborah Koetzle ______________________ _____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Susan Opotow __________________________________________ David Brotherton __________________________________________ Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract TRANSLATOR, TRAITOR: A CRITICAL ETHNOGRAPHY OF A U.S. TERRORISM TRIAL by Maya Hess Adviser: Professor Diana Gordon Historically, the role of translators and interpreters has suffered from multiple misconceptions. In theaters of war, these linguists are often viewed as traitors and kidnapped, tortured, or killed; if they work in the terrorism arena, they may be prosecuted and convicted as terrorist agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Will Campaign to Free Former Student Imprisoned Under Terror
    The ye ar of physics Going underground New year nightlife Flying daggers Celebrating science in 2005, The Caving Club’s ex pedition Ringing in 2005 with some Felix Film takes in a page 7 to Slovenia, page 11 psy-trance, page 14 beautiful movie, page 16 The student newspaper of Imperial College ● Established 1949 ● Issue 1310 ● Thursday 6 January 2005 ● www.felixonline.co.uk The tsunami On Boxing Day, countries sur- rounding the Indian Ocean Union will campaign to free former were struck by one of the worst natural disasters in history. student imprisoned under terror laws There are six articles on the tragedy, including details of Imperial College’s response By Dave Edwards and how an early warning Editor system could have saved thousands of lives. Imperial College Union has uNEWS page 2 resolved to actively support u SCIENCE page 7 the ‘Free Babar Ahmad’ cam- paign. Library loss? Mr Ahmad, a former stu- The popular mechanical engi- dent and staff member at neering department library Imperial College, was arrest- and reading room may close ed in December 2003 under in the near future. The area the Terrorism Act [see Felix is seen as “a potential solu- issue 1279] and subsequently tion to a series of conflicting released without charge. He demands for space”. was rearrested in August this uNEWS page 4 year on allegations of involve- ment in acts of terrorism and Accountability is currently awaiting extradi- The Imperial College Union tion to the United States. His President and other offic- case is due to be reviewed in ers have been criticised for the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the House of Commons Parliamentary
    VOLUME 537 SIXTH SERIES INDEX TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) SESSION 2010–12 5th December—20th December 2011 £00·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000 e-mail: [email protected] Her Majesty’s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd., which is responsible for printing and publishing House publications. INDEX TO THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES OFFICIAL REPORT SIXTH SERIES VOLUME 537 SESSION 2010–12 5th December—20th December 2011 SCOPE The index is derived from the headings that appear in Hansard. The index includes entries covering the names of all Members contributing to the Parliamentary business recorded in Hansard, including Divisions. REFERENCES • References in the indexes are to columns rather than pages. • There are separate sequences in Hansard for the material taken on the floor of the House, Westminster Hall sittings, written statements, written questions, ministerial corrections and petitions • References consisting of a number by itself indicate material taken on the floor of the House. • References ending in ‘wh’ indicate Westminster Hall sittings. • References ending in ‘ws’ indicate written statements. • References ending in ‘w’ indicate written questions. • References ending in ‘p’ indicate written petitions. • References ending in ‘mc’ indicate ministerial corrections. • References under all headings except the names of Members contributing to Parliamentary business and the titles of legislation are listed in one numerical sequence irrespective of whether the material is taken on the floor of the House, is discussed at a Westminster Hall sitting, is a written statement or is a written question.
    [Show full text]
  • IHRC-Issue 6-2005
    Fighting Dicussing Articulating Hijab Bans Liberation our needs PAGE 2 PAGE 6 PAGE 8 VOLUME 6 - RAMADAN 1426 / OCTOBER 2005 In the name of Al-laah, HIS FAMILY WERE MURDERED BY FANATICS. The-Source-Of-Mercy, The-Especially-Merciful. THE AIMS OF THE WHENWHEN WILLWILL ITIT TRULYTRULY ISLAMIC HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ARE: BEBE "NEVER"NEVER AGAIN?"AGAIN?" ■ To champion the rights and duties revealed for human beings. ■ To promote a new social and international order, based on truth, justice,righteousness and generosity, rather than self-interest. ■ To demand virtue and oppose wrongdoing in the exercise of power (from whatever base that power derives - e.g. political, judicial, media, economic, military, personal, etc.). ■ To gather information about, and © AP Photo to publicise, atrocities, oppression, Bosnian boy reciting the Quran at the graves of victims of the Srebrenica massacres, July 2005. discrimination, and other abuses of uly this year witnessed a gave a green light for the attack vived the preachers of hatred. His statements from Muslim leaders. memorial for the worst and even prevented NATO family didn’t. Who will act against Why are such statements divinely-granted rights. atrocity committed in airstrikes to stop the advancing those who murdered them? Who humiliating? Because they are Europe since the Second Serb forces. An apology for the will reform the churches that advo- asked only of Muslims as if we are ■ JWorld War: Srebrenica. international system being com- cated these murders? If Jack all culpable for the crimes of a few. To campaign for redress, and to finally being laid to rest of up to plicit in genocide is, at best, offen- Straw or any of his European coun- At IHRC we believe that communi- 12,000 Bosnian men and boys sive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Answer Is No: Too Little Compassionate Release in US Federal Prisons
    H U M A N R I G H T S WATCH THE ANSWER IS NO Too Little Compassionate Release in US Federal Prisons The Answer is No Too Little Compassionate Release in US Federal Prisons Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-969-0 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch (HRW) is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org. Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM), a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, fights for fair and proportionate federal and state sentencing laws that embrace judicial discretion while guarding public safety. We mobilize thousands, including lawyers, judges, criminal justice experts, and concerned citizens, to join prisoners and families whose lives have been harmed by unjust sentences to work for change. FAMM’s vision is of a nation in which sentencing is individualized, humane, and sufficient but no greater than necessary to impose just punishment, secure public safety, and support successful rehabilitation and reentry.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations: : : 18 U.S.C
    Case 3:06-cr-00194-JCH Document 1 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Case No: : : VIOLATIONS: : : 18 U.S.C. §2339A(Conspiracy to Provide : Material Support to Terrorists) : v. : 18 U.S.C. § 2339A (Providing Material : Support to Terrorists) : : 18 U.S.C. § 956 (Conspiracy to Kill/Injure : Persons Abroad) : : 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy) : SYED TALHA AHSAN : 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Aiding and Abetting) I N D I C T M E N T The Grand jury charges that: INTRODUCTION 1. From in or about 1997, the exact date being unknown to the grand jury, and continuing through at least August, 2004, BABAR AHMAD (“AHMAD”), a resident of the United Kingdom, and AZZAM PUBLICATIONS, who are named but not charged herein, along with the defendant SYED TALHA AHSAN (“AHSAN”), and others known and unknown to the grand jury, provided, and conspired to provide, material support and resources to persons engaged in acts of terrorism in Afghanistan, Chechnya and elsewhere. Specifically, AHMAD, AZZAM PUBLICATIONS, AHSAN and others known and unknown to the grand jury, through the creation and use of various internet websites, e-mail communications, and other means, provided: expert advice and assistance; communications equipment; military items; currency; Case 3:06-cr-00194-JCH Document 1 Filed 06/28/06 Page 2 of 14 monetary instruments; financial services; and personnel, all designed to recruit for and assist the Taliban and the Chechen Mujahideen, and to raise funds for terrorist activities in Afghanistan, Chechnya and other places.
    [Show full text]
  • Punishing the Innocent
    Pierce 3/12/05 2:13 AM Page 44 44 Punishing Perhaps you don’t remember, Gareth, but one of the first times I met you, you said the innocent that, it was the Irish first and I can see now it’s the turn of the Muslims. This was before September 11th had taken place. Did you Gareth Peirce ever envisage that we’d be in the situation interviewed by that we are today that you would have to Moazzam Begg defend people who are held without charge and without trial again? Gareth Peirce is a human No. I’m sure none of us, whatever rights lawyer whose long observations we might have made, list of clients includes the probably in the same way that people at the Birmingham Six, the beginning of the conflict in Northern Guildford Four, Ireland would never have envisaged thirty Guantanamo detainees, the years of sustained nightmares. I don’t think family of Jean Charles de we could ever have thought that things Menezes, and many of the would come to how they are now. men detained without trial or under a control order in We both visited Northern Ireland, I think it the United Kingdom. She was last year, at the opening of the Free spoke to Moazzam Begg Derry Museum and I was very taken by the who is himself a former powerful message that was given out at that Guantanamo detainee and meeting, at the opening of the museum, now the spokesman for the meeting many people, including Martin organisation Cageprisoners McGuinness, for the first time in my life and which first published the seeing that people now were going through exchange on its website the peace process, had gone through a (www.cageprisoners.com), process which began in a sense with from which we reprint these internment, and then Bloody Sunday excerpts.
    [Show full text]
  • Updates for August 20Th
    JNYC ABCI Post Office Box 110034 Brooklyn, New York 11211 Updates for August 20th 10 Jul - Casey Brezik sentenced to 12 years for stabbing In 2010, anarchist Casey Brezik tried to assassinate the governor of MIssouri. He was recently convicted and sentenced to a dozen years. MORE: The man who tried to stab Governor Jay Nixon, but instead stabbed a college dean, will spend 12 years behind bars. A judge sentenced 25-year-old Casey Brezik to 12 years on each of three counts – assault, and two armed criminal action charges – and seven years on a second count of assault. All sentences will run concurrently. The attack happened in September 2010 at Penn Valley Community College. Dean Albert Dimmit was stabbed, but did recover from his injuries. Gov. Nixon was set to speak at the campus but was not there during the attack. 5 Aug - A3 Newsletter: On a Move, But the Struggle Continues On July 12, Louisiana's Hunt prison reduced Herman Wallace's classification from maximum to medium security and transferred him out of solitary confinement into a 10-bunk dorm inside the prison hospital, where he has access to a day room, and does not have to wear leg irons. MORE: While celebrating the more humane conditions, we emphasize that the transfer from solitary is not enough and we are asking folks to continue supporting Amnesty International's call for compassionate release. Expedited Review of Herman's Case There is also some exciting news in Herman's long dormant habeas case. Judge Jackson began a recent status conference with Herman's legal team by granting Herman's request for expedited review.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Introduction in a Recent Wall Street Journal Article, Gary Fields Shared the Story of an Aging Inmate at Louisiana’S Angola
    CURTIN.DOC 1/7/2008 4:26:50 PM THE CONTINUING PROBLEM OF AMERICA’S AGING PRISON POPULATION AND THE SEARCH FOR A COST-EFFECTIVE AND SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF ADDRESSING IT Timothy Curtin The age of America’s prison population continues to rise. Mr. Curtin examines the nature of this trend and addresses how to efficiently and adequately address the problem. The root causes of the problem are examined by looking at the types of offenses elderly prisoners commit, their physical and mental conditions, and their adjustment to prison life. Mr. Curtin then highlights the challenges of accommodating elderly prison inmates in the prison health care system, as well as the proposals to separate the elderly inmate population and implement early-release programs. Next, Mr. Curtin analyzes how telemedicine and congregate housing can reduce costs, save resources, provide health care access, and create a healthier prison environment. Mr. Curtin also shows how the efficiency of early-release programs is not as certain. Finally, Mr. Curtin encourages more public debate on the problems associated with aging prison populations and improved funding. I. Introduction In a recent Wall Street Journal article, Gary Fields shared the story of an aging inmate at Louisiana’s Angola Timothy Curtin is Articles Editor 2007–2008, Member 2006–2007, The Elder Law Jour- nal; J.D. 2008, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; B.A. 1996, Loyola University of Chicago, Political Science and Economics. CURTIN.DOC 1/7/2008 4:26:50 PM 474 The Elder Law Journal VOLUME 15 Prison.1 Fifty-three years old at the time of the story, Richard Leggett was convicted of killing a man and a woman during a store robbery in 1971.2 By 2005, Leggett, then a diabetic with a bad heart valve, served his time as, among other things, the prison’s chief coffin-maker.3 In this capacity he was increasingly busy.
    [Show full text]