DOCSLIB.ORG

ADVISORY. RESEARCH & STRATEGY. VALUATIONS. PROJECTS. CAPITAL. Charterkc.Com.Au

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ADVISORY. RESEARCH & STRATEGY. VALUATIONS. PROJECTS. CAPITAL. Charterkc.Com.Au charterkc.com.au ADVISORY. RESEARCH & STRATEGY. VALUATIONS. PROJECTS. CAPITAL. - Rhodes is a modest scale suburban office hub offering circa 150,000 sq.m. of commercial net lettable area. Most office accommodation has been developed over the past 15 years and is primarily of a suburban “A” grade standard. The majority of office space is located to the south of the subject property within Rhodes Corporate Park (60%) and additionally within contemporary office developments along Rider Boulevard adjacent to (and within) Rhodes Waterside shopping centre in Rhodes West. There have been minimal new stock additions to Rhodes in recent years. - It appears that the primary reason for the proposed zoning amendment to the subject property is due to new employment targets released by the Greater Sydney Commission subsequent to the initial September 2017 Rhodes East Priority Precinct Investigation Area Planning Report. Accordingly, there is a target for creating 1,200 new jobs within Rhodes East by 2036. The subject property has been earmarked to accommodate the majority of the job targets by Government within a standalone office featuring a GFA of circa 40,000 sq.m. A high rise development would be required to house such a considerable content of office space on the subject property. - Contemporary “A” grade office buildings throughout Rhodes feature NLAs ranging on average between 12,000 – 17,000 sq.m. Rhodes Corporate Park collectively accommodates circa 90,000 sq.m. of NLA however this is held within six buildings (averaging approximately 15,000 sq.m. per building). At least 36,000 sq.m. of office NLA (40,000 sq.m. GFA) is mooted for the subject property under the revised precinct plan. This represents approximately one quarter of current office supply in Rhodes and a NLA more than double the size of many current buildings. New development proposals in the major centres of Macquarie Park and Parramatta feature average respective building sizes of 27,500 sq.m. and 36,000 sq.m. being less than or similar to the proposal for the subject property. Given the vastly superior nature and scale of these locations, the large building scale proposed for the subject property is unlikely to be supportable from a financial feasibility perspective given its location within a non-core commercial hub. - The majority of new office development proposed throughout the broader suburban region is located in the major city centre office precincts of Macquarie Park and Parramatta. This is due to an ongoing undersupply and pent up demand in these markets (evidenced by strong take-up and low vacancy rates), uplifts in planning controls facilitating superior development outcomes (particularly in Parramatta), a preference from particularly large scale corporate and government tenants to be located within these key centres, financial feasibility considerations, superior accessibility based on current and future public transport infrastructure, site availability and retail /lifestyle amenity offered in these major precincts. Although there are land limitations in Rhodes, the area enjoys few of the same marketable features as these core precincts. - The majority of new development proposed in the nearby centres of Sydney Olympic Park and Macquarie Park will be in the form of low to medium rise campus style office buildings featuring large scale floorplates of between 2,000 – 3,000 sq.m. It is this scale / configuration that is most sought after in the market (particularly by corporate entities) and remains a focus for developers. Our understanding is that based on the size and configuration of the subject property, much smaller floorplates of up to 1,500 sq.m. can be accommodated and a high rise structure would be required. As such, provision of floorplates this size would considerably limit demand, rental potential and add substantially to construction cost compared with a typical lower rise campus style building offering a similar floor area. - From a market standpoint it is not considered commercially appropriate to accommodate all proposed commercial office space within one property given the proposed scale far exceeds all other office space throughout the area and user profiles / requirements. A more practical and sound approach would be to locate appropriate scale office accommodation over multiple sites or on sites capable of supporting campus style office buildings with large floorplates as is most sought in the market. The main opportunity with regards to the latter is the Hewlett Packard site at 410 Concord Road which has the scale to support a campus style facility similar in context to Rhodes Corporate Centre. In addition there may be potential to accommodate more market appropriate size and scale office development north of the subject where there is greater width between Concord Road and Blaxland Road. - There is considered additional opportunity to provide office development on additional sites in close proximity to the station. Most appropriately this could include a logical northern extension of the offices located at 3 and 5 Rider Boulevard on the land at 2 – 34 Walker Street. This land forms part of the revised Rhodes East Precinct and is considered very well suited to accommodate appropriate scale office buildings. Such developments could potentially form part of mixed use developments and would reduce the burden of a single site needing to provide an uncharacteristically large office development in isolation. - With specific regard to the subject property, there are potential limitations to staging an office development on the property given the relatively modest size and elongated configuration of the site for such a considerable scale development. As such, subject to a massing exercise and architect / design review, the development would most likely need to be undertaken in a single stage. Given funding requirements from lenders for pre-commitments (and potential difficulties in obtaining finance should pre-commitments not be obtained), the large scale of the project high-rise configuration, the considerable financial outlay to construct a high-rise suburban office building (typically circa 30 - 40% premium over more typical low rise campus style developments) plus the location within a non-core office precinct, the financial feasibility of such a project is considered to be in question. - From a broader context, there is considered ample capacity to achieve the 2036 proposed employment targets which have been established for the entire Rhodes peninsula (along with the 1,200 jobs within Rhodes East). In addition to providing jobs within a proposed facility on the subject property, this is based on identified employment opportunities in the area, including the expansion of Concord Hospital, future employment at the Rhodes Corporate Park and future redevelopment of the Hewlett Packard site. In addition to this, other employment generating opportunities will be in the form of a new school, retail and alternate commercial opportunities. - Based on the additional opportunities to achieve job targets in the area and with consideration to market factors, a 40,000 sq.m. high rise office building with floorplates of circa 1,500 sq.m. is not considered viable for the subject property in Rhodes. Any development of this size is considered too large for a suburban office hub and would offer extensive new supply with very limited demand based on configuration with small floorplates and low parking provision. As such, financial feasibility of a project with these characteristics would be in question. 1. Instructions. ................................................................................................................. 1 2. Subject Property Location & Context. ........................................................................... 2 2.1 Subject Property ............................................................................................... 2 2.2 Location ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Surrounding Development ................................................................................. 4 2.4 Transport Infrastructure ................................................................................... 5 3. Employment Analysis. .................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Employment and Labour Force .......................................................................... 7 3.3 Industry of Employment .................................................................................... 9 3.4 Employment & Journey to Work in Rhodes / City of Canada Bay ...................... 11 3.5 Employment Targets ....................................................................................... 13 4. Current Office Supply. ................................................................................................ 15 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Rhodes ............................................................................................................ 15 4.3 Sydney Olympic Park ....................................................................................... 17 4.4 Macquarie Park ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review Canada Bay Council Final Report 6 December 2016
    Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review Canada Bay Council Final Report 6 December 2016 Rhodes Station Preci nct Traffic and Tr ansport R eview Canada Bay C ouncil Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review Project No: IA122000 Document Title: Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review Document No.: Revision: Final Report Date: 6 December 2016 Client Name: Canada Bay Council Client No: Project Manager: Nick Buchanan Author: Nasiha Kadavath File Name: J:\IE\Projects\04_Eastern\IA122000\02 Documents\2016-12-06 Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review - Final Report.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 100 Christie Street St Leonards NSW 2065 Australia PO Box 164 St Leonards NSW 2065 Australia T +61 2 9928 2100 F +61 2 9928 2500 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ Client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1 18/11/16 Draft Report NK NB / IS SK 2 6/12/2016 Final Report NK NB SK 1 Rhodes Station Precinct Traffic and Transport Review Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodes East - Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment Final Report
    Rhodes East - Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment Final Report Client: Roberts Day, on behalf of NSW Department of Planning & Environment Date: 7 December 2016 Contact: Jenny Vozoff [email protected] 02 9387 2600 Sydney 02 9387 2600 Level 6 332 – 342 Oxford Street Bondi Junction NSW 2022 www.elton.com.au [email protected] Sydney | Canberra | Darwin ABN 56 003 853 101 Prepared by Jenny Vozoff Reviewed by Chris Manning Date 7 December 2016 Document name Social Infrastructure and Open Space Final Report 7 December 2016 Version Final v4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Precinct location and context 3 1.2 Precinct vision and objectives 4 2 PRECINCT PLANNING CONTEXT 6 2.1 Policy and planning context 6 2.2 Demographic context 21 2.2.1 Existing population 21 2.2.2 Future population 23 3 EXISTING SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN SPACE PROVISION 24 3.1.1 Regional level infrastructure 24 3.1.2 District and local level infrastructure 26 3.2 Open space and recreational facilities 30 3.3 Identified needs 31 4 FUTURE POPULATION AND PROFILE 33 4.1 The development scenario 33 4.2 Forecast dwelling yields and population 33 4.3 Demographic characteristics of future population 35 4.3.1 Characteristics of high density areas 35 4.3.2 Implications for the Rhodes East Precinct 36 5 COMMUNITY FACILITY REQUIREMENTS 38 5.1 Approach to planning social infrastructure 38 5.2 Local government community facilities 40 5.2.1 Community centres 40 5.2.2 Facilities and services for older people 44 5.2.3 Facilities for young people 44 5.2.4
    [Show full text]
  • Invest at the Orchards
    INVEST AT THE ORCHARDS With $3 billion being invested to expand and AMENITY NEARBY redevelop Norwest Business Park, Norwest will become one of Sydney’s fastest growing dynamic regions NORWEST CASTLE THE ORCHARDS PRIVATE HOSPITAL TOWERS The Orchards is the largest masterplanned community in the 5 MINUTES 10 MINUTES Norwest region developed by Sekisui House. Located at 30 Fairway Drive Kellyville The Orchards is a stones throw from the new Norwest Train Station and positioned comfortably alongside Castle Hill Country Club. 1300 luxury 1,2,3 and 4 bedroom ABUNDANCE CASTLE HILL apartments are scheduled for completion by 2024. OF SCHOOLS COUNTRY CLUB Australia’s largest public transport project will incorporate 31 10 MINUTES NEIGHBOURING railway stations across a 66 km route between the Sydney CBD and the north-west growth corridor, representing an investment INVESTMENT ANALYSIS of around $8.3 billion. Sydney Metro Northwest is delivering 8 new railway stations and 4000 commuter car parking spaces to Sydney’s growing North West. Trains will run every 4 minutes MEDIAN in peak times. Source: www.sydneymetro.info BAULKHAM Unit HILLS House LIVE THE ORCHARDS WAY $830,000 Median $1,216,000 The largest amount of private community amenity in the area Price including an outdoor cinema, fitness and wellness centre, indoor pool, outdoor lagoon pool, 1.4-hectare linear park, $530 Median $600 outdoor community games and kitchen facilities, extensive Weekly Rent bike trails, outdoor dining, community café and and an organic 3.3% Rental Yield 2.6% grocery store. 1.7% Vacancy Rate 1.7% WHY INVEST IN NORTH WEST SYDNEY? The Sydney residential property market is one of the strongest in STRATA FIGURES the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodes East Priority Precinct Investigation Area Planning Report
    Rhodes East Priority Precinct Investigation Area Planning Report SEPTEMBER 2017 CONTENTS Executive summary 2 7.0 Infrastructure and funding 45 7.1 Infrastructure schedule 45 1.0 Introduction 4 7.2 Infrastructure funding 48 1.1 Demand for growth 4 7.3 Utilities and services 49 1.2 The Investigation Area 6 7.4 Monitoring 49 1.3 Priority Precincts 6 1.4 Purpose of this report 7 8.0 Next steps 50 8.1 Finalisation of the Precinct Plan 50 2.0 Rhodes East overview 8 8.2 Key actions 50 2.1 Existing development and character 8 2.2 The existing community 9 Figures 2.3 Surrounding areas of growth 9 Figure 1 A Plan for Growing Sydney 2.4 Current planning controls 10 – connecting jobs and homes 4 Figure 2 Rhodes East investigation area 6 3.0 Key considerations 11 Figure 3 The investigation process 7 3.1 Providing homes 11 Figure 4 Existing character areas 8 3.2 Matching facilities with growth 11 Figure 5 Canada Bay LEP 2013 – land zoning map 10 3.3 Traffic and transport 12 Figure 6 Access and movement summary map 14 3.4 Delivering affordable housing 15 Figure 7 Canada Bay Council LEP 2015 heritage items 16 3.5 Responding to existing character 15 Figure 8 Landscape and natural environment summary map 19 3.6 Sensitively integrating existing heritage 16 Figure 9 Built form summary map 21 3.7 Integrating sustainability goals 17 Figure 10 Land to be rezoned map 27 3.8 Landscape and open space 17 Figure 11 Draft precinct plan 29 3.9 Built form 20 Figure 12 Context sensitive streets plan 31 4.0 Community and stakeholder consultation 22 Figure 13 Pedestrian
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS) Report on Submissions
    Outcome of Exhibition DRAFT Local Strategic Planning Statement (LSPS) Report on Submissions August 2019 Draft LSPS planning proposal Discussion Paper 2019 1. Table of Contents 2. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 The LSPS ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Consultation Strategy ................................................................................................................................ 4 Previous community consultations for the draft LSPS .................................................................................. 4 Public Authorities .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Individual notifications .................................................................................................................................. 5 Advertisement in local newspaper ................................................................................................................ 5 Advertisement on Council website ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chain Mail Editor: Doug Stewart 9887 1478 Bicycle User Group Bike North Newsletter Number 3, Dec 1997 - Feb 1998   Freely
    The Secretary PO Box 719 Gladesville 2111 Chain Mail Editor: Doug Stewart 9887 1478 Bicycle User Group Bike North Newsletter Number 3, Dec 1997 - Feb 1998 freely. This list gives you the opportunity to ask Welcome. With the Christmas break and lots of questions or to air any views on cycling. The list other activities this issue is a fair bit later than has been quiet recently (averaging less than expected. Contributions welcome to the address one message per week) but there is no limit to [email protected] above or email to . how many messages you may receive. Please send back the form on the last page The Talk List is also available in weekly digest which covers a variety of items including form which combines all the postings in a single membership renewal. week into a single email which is sent out weekly. This allows you to see everything on the email talk list but not as it is sent. Bike North Local News To join either list email Keith Griffin at Successful Christmas Party [email protected]. Tell him whether you want to be on the News List or Despite a slight rain shower about thirty Bike the Talk List or both and if you join the Talk Northers enjoyed our second annual Christmas List, whether you want the weekly digest form. get-together on the 14th of December. The You can also mark your preference down on our purple Bike North Banner was unfurled Dear Bike North form (enclosed). between the trees at Bicentennial Park in West Pymble and then a very pleasant picnic lunch was enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Since 2012
    Progress Since 2012 Name Suburb Region/District Project Type Project Description Current Status 2nd Bulk Liquids Berth Port Botany Eastern City Freight Planning approval to develop a second Bulk Liquids Completed District Berth (BLB2) at Port Botany was received in 2008. On 31 May 2011, John Holland Pty Ltd was engaged to construct the BLB2. The berth became operational in December 2013. The main products handled at the BLB are refined fuels, gases and chemicals / other bulk liquids. BLB2 comprise a steel piled pier adjacent to the existing BLB1; associated infrastructure such as marine loading arms, fire fighting equipment, onshore support facilities and pipelines from existing user sites to the new berth. The open access, multi user berth operates on a 24 hour/ 7 day per week basis. BLB2 has been designed to accommodate 120,000 dead weight tonne vessels to a maximum of 270m length overall. Abbotsford Wharf - Abbotsford Eastern City Maritime The upgrade aims to provide easier access to the wharf, Planning Wharf Upgrade District better weather protection, additional seating, improved program safety, quicker and more efficient boarding and disembarking, increased capacity and more efficient interchange with other modes of transport. Acacia Avenue Lake Munmorah Central Coast Walking and Cycling Shared Path cycleway alongside Acacia Avenue Completed cycleway Name Suburb Region/District Project Type Project Description Current Status Additional Boating Castle Cove North Maritime Planning Access Points at Middle Harbour (Investigation), Willoughby Additional Boating Penrith West Maritime Investigation and concept designs for eight passive craft Planning Access Points on the access points to the Neapean River. Nepean River (Investigation) Airds Road cycleway Leumeah Western City Walking and Cycling Shared Path cycleway alongside Airds Road Completed District Airport East Precinct Mascot Eastern City Road Roads east of the airport will be upgraded and the In-Progress District General Holmes Drive rail level crossing will be removed by constructing a road underpass.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepean River Green Bridge Transport Study
    Appendix A TfNSW – Traffic and Transport report Prepared for 29 June 2012 Transport for NSW Nepean River Green Bridge Transport Study DRAFT Creating, enhancing and sustaining the world’s built, natural and social environments. AECOM Nepean River Green Bridge D R A F T Nepean River Green Bridge Transport Study Prepared for Transport for NSW Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 21, 420 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000, PO Box Q410, QVB Post Office NSW 1230, Australia T +61 2 8934 0000 F +61 2 8934 0001 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 29 June 2012 60266082 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001 and ISO14001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLY-Death of T. W. Dalton Tuesday, 18 August, 1981 Death Of
    184 ASSEMBLY-Death of T. W. Dalton Tuesday, 18 August, 1981 Death of Thomas William Dalton, a former Member of the Legislative Assembly- Petitions-Questions without Notice-Sessional Committees (House, Library, Printing)-Governor's Speech: Address in Reply (Third Day's Debate)- Adjournment (Port Botany Hazard Survey). Mr Speaker (The Hon. Lawrence Borthwick Kclly) tool< the chair at 2.15 p.m. Mr Spealrer offered the Prayer. DEATH OF THOMAS WILLIAM DALTON, A FORMER MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Mr WRAN (Bass Hill), Premier and Treasurer [2.16!: I move: That this House extcnds to the Iamily of Thomas William Dalton, a former Member of this House, the deep sympathy of Members of the Legislative Assembly in the loss sustained by his death. Thomas Dalton served this House and the people of his electorate faithfully from 14th February, 1953, to 6th February, 1956, and from 21st March, 1959, to 23rd January, 1968. His maiden speech to this House on 19th August, 1953, set the tone for his parliamentary career. Above all, he was concerned with the problems of his electorate, centred on the then rapidly growing Sutherland district. In that speech he spolte on housing, transport and the industrial development of the Botany Bay region. It is ironical that one of the principal concerns that he expressed in his maiden speech was for home buyers following the increases in housing interest rates by the federal Government of the day. In recent years we have become accustomed to hearing of the need to tackle urban problems and to plan for future urban develop- ments.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Canada Bay LGA
    Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study AECOM City of Canada Bay LGA 163 Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study – LGA Management Summaries October 2010 Parramatta River Estuary Processes Study AECOM 9.4 City of Canada Bay 9.4.1 General Description The City of Canada Bay LGA contains over 35km of shoreline which is one of the largest foreshore area that any one local government authority is responsible for. Land use is primarily low and medium density residential with significant areas dedicated to public recreation (parks along drainage reserves, golf course, wharves, and foreshore reserves) and special use (infrastructure) areas (e.g. Rivendell Child Adolescent & Family Unit, Concord Repatriation Hospital and “Yaralla House” Dame Eadith Walker Hospital) The LGA contributes a catchment area of approximately 1,847.6 ha to the estuary study area, its tributaries and embayments, excluding land draining to Homebush Bay and Iron Cove Bay catchments (refer Section 3.0), include the following: x Iron Cove Bay, downstream to Iron Cove Bridge (28.8 ha); x River South, Iron Cove Bridge to Five Dock Point (77.9 ha); x Five Dock Bay (206.1 ha); x Abbotsford Bay (47.9 ha); x Hen and Chicken Bay (849.5 ha). x Kendall Bay, including foreshore land upstream to Breakfast Point, and downstream to Cabarita Point (74.8 ha); x Majors Bay (215.5 ha); x Yaralla Bay (76.9ha); x Brays Bay, including foreshore land west to John Whitton Bridge (85.4 ha); and x Homebush Bay (75.2 ha) 9.4.2 Stormwater Management and GPTs The City of Canada Bay Council has installed a number of GPTs in various catchments within the LGA.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Assessment
    HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Rhodes East Structure Plan December 2016 NSW Department of Planning and Environment Heritage Assessment September 2016 Rhodes East Structure Plan Rhodes East Structure Plan Heritage Assessment ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUED BY A Draft for Review 16/09/2016 GB B Amended Draft 22/09/2016 GB C Draft for Review 5/10/16 GB D Final Report 8/12/16 GB GBA Heritage 1/71 York St, Sydney NSW 2000 Australia T: (61) 2 9299 8600 F: (61) 2 9299 8711 E: [email protected] W: www.gbaheritage.com ABN: 56 073 802 730 CAN: 073 802 730 Page 2 Nominated Architect: Graham Leslie Brooks – NSW Architects Registration 3836 Heritage Assessment September 2016 Rhodes East Structure Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 CONTEXT 1.2 THE STUDY AREA 1.3 THE SUBJECT HERITAGE ITEMS 1.4 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY PROCESS 1.5 AUTHORSHIP 1.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2.0 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 8 2.1 DEVELOPMENT OF THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE 3.0 THE INDIVIDUAL HERITAGE ITEMS 19 3.1 59 BLAXLAND ROAD, HOUSE AND GARDEN 3.2 63 BLAXLAND ROAD, FORMER RHODES PUBLIC SCHOOL 3.3 4A CAVELL AVENUE, REMNANT TREES IN FRONT GARDEN 3.4 14 CAVELL AVENUE, WAREHOUSE 3.5 35 CAVELL AVENUE, HOUSE 3.6 CAVELL AVENUE STREET TREES 3.7 KING GEORGE V PARK 38 McILWAINE PARK 3.9 UHR’S POINT RESERVE 3.10 6 CROPLEY STREET, HOUSE 3.11 19 CROPLEY STREET, HOUSE 3.12 CROPLEY STREET TREES 3.13 20 LLEWELLYN STREET, HOUSE 3.14 23 LLEWELLYN STREET, HOUSE 3.15 37 LLEWELLYN STREET, HOUSE 3.16 71 LLEWELLYN STREET, HOUSE 3.17 73 LLEWELLYN STREET, HOUSE 3.18 LLEWELLYN STREET TREES 4.0 HERITAGE ITEMS IN THE
    [Show full text]
  • Emu Plains to Lapstone
    EIS 340 AA052343 F4-Western Freeway: section : Emu Plains to Lapstone: environmental impact statement NS DEPT PRIMARI IRUSTR1ES AAO5 2343 r.]IrIi ill 111T11*1111(i1I:1] STATEMENT I I Prepared by Sinclair Knight & Partners Pty Ltd I I I I I I F4 - WESTERN FREEWAY I I Section: Ernu Plains to Lapstone I I 1 I CEAT2T CF I I L I I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 1 STATEM ENT I ERRATA The vehicle trips scales for Exhibits 4.3 and 4.4 have been interchanged. I The scale for Exhibit 4.3 is on Exhibit 4.4 and vice versa. The Legend for Exhibit 5.4 should have noise monitoring sites 1 depicted as dots with black lines representing noise contours. I Prepared by Sinclair Knight & Partners Pty Ltd I 1 I I F4 - WESTERN FREEWAY I I Section: Emu Plains to Lapstone I I I I I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I STATEM ENT I I I This is to certify that this Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared in accordance with clauses 57 and 58 of the I Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation, 1980. I 'L" '~"-'L I Z R D Crooks I Manager- Environmental Services Sinclair Knight & Partners Pty Ltd L] 12 January 1987 I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page 1 i. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SUMMARY 1 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT 1 1.2 THE PROPOSED EXTENSION 1 1.3 INTERACTIONS WITH THE ENViRONMENT 2 1.3.1 Traffic 2 1.3.2 Access 3 I 1.3.3 Safety 3 1.3.4 Impacts on Business 4 1.3.5 Land Use & Zoning 4 1.3.6 Landscape Values 4 I 1.3.7 Noise Effects 4 1.3.8 Other Impacts 5 I 1.4 CONCLUSION 5 2.
    [Show full text]