DOCSLIB.ORG

10D Vector Control Study Guide 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
10D Vector Control Study Guide 2017 Mosquito, House Fly, and Vector Control Study Guide A Guide for Commercial Applicators Category 10d Asian Tiger mosquito Drone fl y House fl y Brown Dog tick Tree Hole mosquito Bottle or Blow fl y May 2017 - The Ohio Department of Agriculture - Pesticide and Fertilizer Regulation - Certifi cation and Training Section 1 Editor: Diana Roll Designer: Diana Roll 2 Acknowledgements This study guide was adapted from Bulletin 641 of the Ohio State University Extension. Authors of Bulletin 641: Prepared by William F. Lyon (Extension Entomologist) and Julie A. Steel (Research Assistant) Authors of Fact Sheets: HGY-2073-07 Ticks: Susan G. Jones (Associate professor of Entomology), Richard E. Gary, Mary K. Daniels, and Steve W. Chordas III (Public Health Entomologist) from the Ohio Department of Health. HYG 2100-98 Chiggers: William F. Lyon (Extension Entomologist the Ohio State University) HYG 2111-96 Domestic Flies: William F. Lyon (Extension Entomologist the Ohio State University). Introduction Facts: Courtesy of the Ohio Department of Health, Zoonotic Disease Program Disease and Insect Facts: Courtesy of the CDC website University of Florida and American Mosquito Control Association: Application Equipment Vector Bytes by Ed Meehan Subject Matter Experts Dr. David Shetlar – Ohio State University – Entomology Brian Deenihan – Clarke Mosquito – Mosquito Education Devon Rogers – Ohio Department of Agriculture – Pesticides Barb Bloetscher – Ohio Department of Agriculture – Plant Pest Jennifer Andon – PSEP – Ohio State University Maryann Rose – PSEP – Ohio State University Tim McDermott DMV – Extension Educator – Ohio State University Cover Photos; Asian tiger mosquito courtesy of: Susan Ellis, Bugwood.org House fly courtesy of Clemson University - Extension slide series, Bugwood.org Tree Mosquito courtesy of Susan Ellis, Bugwood.org. Drone Fly courtesy of Sturgis McKeever, Georgia Southern University, Bugwood.org Brown Dog Tick courtesy of J. F. Butler, University of Florida Bottle or Blow Fly courtesy of J Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org Proofreading by: Kelly Bouberry, Devon Rogers and Chris Watson Ohio Department of Ag 3 Contents Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 6 Facts ........................................................................................................................................................................6 LaCrosse Encephalitis .............................................................................................................................................6 Animals associated with La Crosse Encephalitis in Ohio: .....................................................................................6 Saint Louis encephalitis ..........................................................................................................................................7 Eastern Equine Encephalitis ...................................................................................................................................7 Animals associated with Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus in Ohio: ....................................................................7 West Nile Virus (Encephalitis) ...............................................................................................................................8 Animals associated with West Nile Encephalitis in Ohio: .....................................................................................8 Heartworm Disease .................................................................................................................................................8 AIDS and HIV ........................................................................................................................................................8 Zika Virus (information from CDC) .......................................................................................................................9 Protection from Mosquitoes ....................................................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 2 MOSQUITOES (ID and MANAGEMENT) ......................................................................................... 10 Characteristics ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Biology ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Troublesome Mosquitoes in Ohio ......................................................................................................................... 11 Woodland (Aedes canadensis) .............................................................................................................................. 11 Tree Hole (Aedes triseriatus) ................................................................................................................................ 12 Multi-Habitat (Aedes trivittatus) ........................................................................................................................... 12 Inland Floodwater (Aedes vexans) ........................................................................................................................ 12 Malarial Mosquito (Anopheles quadrimaculatus)................................................................................................. 13 Cattail Marsh Mosquito (Coquillettidia (Mansonia) perturbans ) ....................................................................... 13 Northern House Mosquito (Culex pipiens) ........................................................................................................... 14 Gallinipper Mosquito (Psorophora ciliate) .......................................................................................................... 14 Mosquitoes Imported into Ohio ............................................................................................................................ 15 Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) .............................................................................................................. 15 Yellow Fever Mosquito (Aedes aegypti) .............................................................................................................. 15 CHAPTER 3 MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 16 Mosquito Control Programs .................................................................................................................................. 16 Mosquito Surveys ................................................................................................................................................. 16 Breeding Site Reduction ....................................................................................................................................... 16 Protecting Honey Bees .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Larval Control (Larviciding) ................................................................................................................................ 17 Adult Control (Adulticiding) ................................................................................................................................ 17 4 Ultra-Low Volume Application ............................................................................................................................ 17 Thermal Fogging ................................................................................................................................................... 18 Residual Spraying ................................................................................................................................................. 18 Combination Products ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Indoor Control....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Repellents ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-tolua-mide or N, N-diethyl-3-methyl-benzamide) .......................................................... 19 Picardin (2-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperidinecarboxylic acid 1-methylpropyl ester) ............................................... 19 Permethrin (clothing, bed nets and other fabric only: DO NOT APPLY TO SKIN) ........................................... 19 Oil of Lemon eucalyptus (OLE) or PDM (para-methane-3, 8-diol) ..................................................................... 19 IR3535 (3-[N-butyl-N-acetyl]-aminopropionic acid, ethyl ester) ......................................................................... 19 Repelling Devices and Plants ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuisance Insects and Climate Change
    www.defra.gov.uk Nuisance Insects and Climate Change March 2009 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Nobel House 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Tel: 020 7238 6000 Website: www.defra.gov.uk © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2007 This publication is value added. If you wish to re-use this material, please apply for a Click-Use Licence for value added material at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/value-added-licence- information/index.htm. Alternatively applications can be sent to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ; Fax: +44 (0)1603 723000; email: [email protected] Information about this publication and further copies are available from: Local Environment Protection Defra Nobel House Area 2A 17 Smith Square London SW1P 3JR Email: [email protected] This document is also available on the Defra website and has been prepared by Centre of Ecology and Hydrology. Published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 2 An Investigation into the Potential for New and Existing Species of Insect with the Potential to Cause Statutory Nuisance to Occur in the UK as a Result of Current and Predicted Climate Change Roy, H.E.1, Beckmann, B.C.1, Comont, R.F.1, Hails, R.S.1, Harrington, R.2, Medlock, J.3, Purse, B.1, Shortall, C.R.2 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 2Rothamsted Research, 3Health Protection Agency March 2009 3 Contents Summary 5 1.0 Background 6 1.1 Consortium to perform the work 7 1.2 Objectives 7 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Fauna of Livestock's of Marvdasht County of Fars Province In
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 54 (1), pp. 85–98 (2019) DOI: 10.1556/038.54.2019.008 Fly Fauna of Livestock’s of Marvdasht County of Fars Province in the South of Iran A. ANSARI POUR1, S. TIRGARI1*, J. SHAKARAMI2, S. IMANI1 and A. F. DOUSTI3 1Department of Entomology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran 2Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran 3Department of Plant Protection, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom Branch, Jahrom, Fars Iran (Received: 5 August 2018; accepted: 13 August 2018) Flies damage the livestock industry in many ways, including damages, physical disturbances, the transmissions of pathogens and the emergence of problems for livestock like Myiasis. In this research, the fauna of flies of Marvdasht County was investigating, which is one of the central counties of Fars province in southern Iran. In this study, a total of 20 species of flies from 6 families and 15 genera have been identified and reported. The species collected are as follows: Muscidae: Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, Musca autumnalis* De Geer, 1776, Stomoxys calci- trans** Linnaeus, 1758, Haematobia irritans** Linnaeus, 1758 Fanniidae: Fannia canicularis* Linnaeus, 1761 Calliphoridae: Calliphora vomitoria* Linnaeus, 1758, Chrysomya albiceps* Wiedemann, 1819, Lu- cilia caesar* Linnaeus, 1758, Lucilia sericata* Meigen, 1826, Lucilia cuprina* Wiedemann, 1830 Sarcophagidae: Sarcophaga africa* Wiedemann, 1824, Sarcophaga aegyptica* Salem, 1935, Wohl- fahrtia magnifica** Schiner, 1862 Tabanidae: Tabanus autumnalis* Linnaeus, 1761, Tabanus bromius* Linnaeus, 1758 Syrphidae: Eristalis tenax* Linnaeus, 1758, Syritta pipiens* Linnaeus, 1758, Eupeodes nuba* Wiede- mann, 1830, Syrphus vitripennis** Meigen, 1822, Scaeva albomaculata* Macquart, 1842 Species identified with * for the first time in the county and the species marked with ** are reported for the first time from the Fars province.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies
    Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA Printed in the United States of America Cover design by Lynn Ekblad, Different Angles, Ames, Iowa Graphics and layout by Richard Beachler, Instructional Technology Center, Iowa State University, Ames ISBN 1-887383-23-9 ISSN 0194-4088 06 05 04 03 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Integrated Pest Management: Current and Future Strategies. p. cm. -- (Task force report, ISSN 0194-4088 ; no. 140) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-887383-23-9 (alk. paper) 1. Pests--Integrated control. I. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. II. Series: Task force report (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) ; no. 140. SB950.I4573 2003 632'.9--dc21 2003006389 Task Force Report No. 140 June 2003 Council for Agricultural Science and Technology Ames, Iowa, USA Task Force Members Kenneth R. Barker (Chair), Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Esther Day, American Farmland Trust, DeKalb, Illinois Timothy J. Gibb, Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana Maud A. Hinchee, ArborGen, Summerville, South Carolina Nancy C. Hinkle, Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens Barry J. Jacobsen, Department of Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology, Montana State University, Bozeman James Knight, Department of Animal and Range Science, Montana State University, Bozeman Kenneth A. Langeland, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville Evan Nebeker, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State David A. Rosenberger, Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University–Hudson Valley Laboratory, High- land, New York Donald P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Burial of a Body on the Growth of Blowfly Larvae and Pupate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online 1 The colonisation of remains by the muscid flies Muscina stabulans (Fallén) and Muscina prolapsa (Harris) (Diptera: Muscidae) Alan Gunn* School of Natural Sciences & Psychology, John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT In the field, the muscid flies Muscina stabulans (Fallén) and Muscina prolapsa (Harris) only colonised buried baits in June, July and August. The two-species co- occurred on baits buried at 5cm but only M. prolapsa colonised baits buried at 10cm. Other species of insect were seldom recovered from buried baits regardless of the presence or absence of Muscina larvae. In the laboratory, both M. stabulans and M. prolapsa preferentially colonised liver baits on the soil surface compared to those buried at 5cm. Baits buried in dry soil were not colonised by either species whilst waterlogged soil severely reduced colonisation but did not prevent it entirely. Dry liver presented on the soil surface was colonised and supported growth to adulthood but if there was no surrounding medium in which the larvae could burrow then they died within 24 hours. M. stabulans showed a consistent preference for ovipositing on decaying liver rather than fresh liver, even when it had decayed for 41 days. The results for M. prolapsa were more variable but it was also capable of developing on both fresh and very decayed remains. Blood-soaked soil and dead slugs and snails stimulated egg-laying by both species and supported larval growth to adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    NEWSLETTER of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 2 & 3 August, 1991 Michigan mosquitoes: more to them than the bite! Edward D. Walker, Department of Entomology, Michigan State University osquitoes are as regular as enthusiast. Of course, mosquitoes are based upon the life history traits of lar­ rain in Michigan, as every true flies of the suborder Nematocera vae: the spring flood-water mosquitoes, the M outdoor fancier and even and like other holometabolous insects summer flood-water mosquitoes, the marsh some couch potatoes know. And mos­ have a developmental cycle involving and swamp mosquitoes, and container-in­ quitoes and their side effects (disease) metamorphosis from theeggto theadult habiting mosquitoes. A few species can be are intimately tied in with the historical stage. Mosquito eggs are laid singly or found in a wide variety of larval habitats development of Michigan as a state. No in clusters on or near water, or in areas and these groupings become less useful less a person than Alexis de Tocqueville that will flood afterrainfall orsnowmelt. for those exceptions. decried the pestiferous mosquitoes when Tiny, worm-like larvae ("wrigglers") The spring flood-water mosquitoes hemade his trek from Detroit to Saginaw hatch from the eggs and develop in the include members of the genus Aedes, Bay in 1844, wondering how anyone water through four larval ins tars to the with colorful specific epithets like could possibly put up with them. In pupal stage. The larvaefeed usingelaoo­ excrucians, stimulans, and provocans. Lar­ 1858, according to a speaker at an 1898 ra te filtering mechanisms on a variety of vae of spring flood-water mosquitoes celebration of the 50th anniversary of microorganisms and organic matter in hatch from the egg in March, in pools of the founding of Michigan Agricultural the water.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Tqiltfl Gn Qrahdt 'T.T+Ttfl - 3Cg U\To
    qlc{l}s'fts d'r rL'ftl-tct oilc{-sfl 'tqiltfl gN qRaHdt 't.t+ttfl - 3Cg U\tO r5rfr I ff EEtf,IlFfrt u f Effltfy lt|.[b.ft rrti uQqarcj.e{ tI[ troa C tJdderor il.&a, ?ooc scrrr u (r) o{l Page No.-1 f,iar- o{l qRqa t{ls (irL{l.oer .rdt.rfl fd.atclotL ct.3 \/oL/?oog, crr'oc/oc/?o1'e{ ' q2t {lrlSl-loeoog-3 3 tt3 sY-r,rtaAqttjil.e r'ti' sct ufdtrr{lat s}tis "i' q"cf otg r{. - ? o q, d[. O S,/o Y,/ ? o t q D' ) {./ ?U / 3 . 3,/ Y 3 o t Uq'o / t Ul{|'qtq'( r,tell uqtQ.a secrt:{ l,tta. E } {[d.ft r,t[Qstt r't[0'G.qq"t 5a{ - u dact.{ +qai m&e sa.rt"t ortqaf riLl}.sA.t Stualsr G.A.D.) ql "[L sl{ rtat i.qn sr.rt:{i r,tO.a E. qi. at. ot,/ott/?o?o"t qQ(Adl uutgl rtuaa sacrtul r,rtda D. ar{trrt - te,/oq,/?o?o ql.cft)s'fts o't A"{l{a ou"s{l 't.til{t 5G. qRqHdl "t.{il{-3CS YttO ,ffiu )aftgf't.t. oesgo Qet c?Y .ra<,ig daaafl sldn <.r+u{ gR qG.oRdt dqut{-3e9 u\to Page No.-2 {r[dd ui uRqqcj.E ot/or{/?o?o r,rqstrQlsr 93?gt [d.ot.t ULctL dtGt? 1. {+urq {+errua, GEeit, stqf ui gerf"0 ficra] ox {+€rtat u[0.stflr,i.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Calyptratae
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile DOMÍNGUEZ, M. CECILIA; ROIG-JUÑENT, SERGIO A. Historical biogeographic analysis of the family Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), with special reference to the austral species of the genus Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) using dispersal-vicariance analysis Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 84, núm. 1, 2011, pp. 65-82 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944297005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FANNIIDAE (DIPTERA) 65 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 84: 65-82, 2011 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE Historical biogeographic analysis of the family Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), with special reference to the austral species of the genus Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) using dispersal-vicariance analysis Análisis biogeográfico histórico de la familia Fanniidae (Diptera: Calyptratae), con referencia especial a las especies australes del genero Fannia (Diptera: Fanniidae) usando análisis de dipersion-vicarianza M. CECILIA DOMÍNGUEZ* & SERGIO A. ROIG-JUÑENT Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), Centro Científico Tecnologico (CCT-CONICET, Mendoza), Av. Adrián Ruiz Leal s/n, Parque Gral. San Martin, Mendoza, Argentina, CC: 507, CP: 5500 *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to achieve a hypothesis explaining the biogeographical history of the family Fanniidae, especially that of the species from Patagonia, the Neotropics, Australia, and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Eating You? Chiggers
    CLOSE ENCOUNTERS WITH THE ENVIRONMENT What’s Eating You? Chiggers Dirk M. Elston, MD higger is the common name for the 6-legged larval form of a trombiculid mite. The larvae C suck blood and tissue fluid and may feed on a variety of animal hosts including birds, reptiles, and small mammals. The mite is fairly indiscrimi- nate; human hosts will suffice when the usual host is unavailable. Chiggers also may be referred to as harvest bugs, harvest lice, harvest mites, jiggers, and redbugs (Figure 1). The term jigger also is used for the burrowing chigoe flea, Tunga penetrans. Chiggers belong to the family Trombiculidae, order Acari, class Arachnida; many species exist. Trombiculid mites are oviparous; they deposit their eggs on leaves, blades of grass, or the open ground. After several days, the egg case opens, but the mite remains in a quiescent prelarval stage. Figure 1. Chigger mite. After this prelarval stage, the small 6-legged larvae become active and search for a host. During this larval 6-legged stage, the mite typically is found attaches at sites of constriction caused by clothing, attached to the host. After a prolonged meal, the where its forward progress has been impeded. Penile larvae drop off. Then they mature through the and scrotal lesions are not uncommon and may be 8-legged free-living nymph and adult stages. mistaken for scabies infestation. Seasonal penile Chiggers can be found throughout the world. In swelling, pruritus, and dysuria in children is referred the United States, they are particularly abundant in to as summer penile syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson-Nicola Regional District Nuisance Mosquito
    THOMPSON-NICOLA REGIONAL DISTRICT NUISANCE MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM 2011 YEAR-END REPORT Prepared by: ___________________________ Burke Phippen, BSc., RPBio. Project Manager ___________________________ Cheryl Phippen, BSc., RN Field Coordinator NOVEMBER, 2011 BWP CONSULTING INC. 6211 Meadowland C res S, Kamloops, BC V2C 6X3 2011 Thompson-Nicola Regional District Mosquito Control Program Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1. RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR MOSQUITO CONTROL PROGRAM ................................. 5 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ......................................................................................... 5 2.1. SNOW PACK .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1. TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION .......................................................................... 7 2.2. FLOW LEVELS ............................................................................................................ 9 3.0 LARVICIDING PROGRAM ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Active Schools
    WisconsinSuccess Stories W ISCONSINActive D EPARTMENT SchoolsOF P UBLIC I NSTRUCTION WisconsinSuccess Stories Active Schools Ken Wagner Education Consultant Student Services/Prevention and Wellness Team Tony Evers, PhD, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Madison, Wisconsin, USA This document is in the public domain and may be downloaded from the website, copied and/or reprinted. This publication is available from: Student Services/Prevention & Wellness Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 125 South Webster Street Madison, WI 53703 (608) 266-8960 http://dpi.wi.gov/sspw/physicaled.html © July, 2012 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, religion, creed, age, national origin, ancestry, pregnancy, marital status or parental status, sexual orientation, or disability. Printed on Recycled Paper Contents Introduction . 1 Elementary Elcho . 3 Green Bay J F Kennedy . .5 Neenah Hoover . 7 Oakfield . 9 Middle Deerfield . .11 Osceola . .13 High Beloit Memorial . 15 Platteville . .17 Appendices Policies Milwaukee Public Schools . .19 Neenah Joint School District . 20 Osseo-Fairchild School District . 21 Evaluation Summary . 24 vi TheIntroduction Active Schools project was a partnership between the To provide guidance on effective strategies to increase Wisconsin Department of Health Services, the University physical activity, the DPI developed the Active Schools of Wisconsin – Madison Population Health Institute, and Toolkit, available at http://dpi.wi.gov/sspw/pdf/ the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI). pasastoolkit.pdf. The DPI encouraged grantees to select The project was supported by the American Recovery at least three strategies from the Active Schools Toolkit. and Reinvestment Act, through a grant from the Centers The most commonly selected strategies fall into four for Disease Control and Prevention, as part of a national categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology and Treatment of Sarcoptic Mange in Bu:Ffalo Calves Around Lahore
    Paki.wan Vel. J.. 18 (/ J · !91JS EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TREATMENT OF SARCOPTIC MANGE IN BU:FFALO CALVES AROUND LAHORE Farhat Jabeen. N. Ahmad1, M. Anwar Chaudhry and Ijaz Javed1 Livestock and Dairy Development Department. Punjab. 1Facuhy of Veterinary Science. University of Agriculture. Faisalabad. Pakistan ABSTRACT A project was conducted to study the prevalence of sarcoptic mange in buffalo calves around Lahore city. The effects of age and sex of the calf and the seasons of the year on the incidence of this disease were also investigated. For this purpose, 2000 buffalo calves. varying in age from I to 12 momhs. \Verc examined over a 12 month period, from January to December, 1994. The results showed thai 7. 00 1;; ' 140 out of 2000) of the calves were infected with the disease. The highest prevalence ( 12.67%) was recorded in winter while the lowest (0.46%) in summer. During spring and autumn, the prevalence of the problem was R. 94 and 8. 17%, respectively. Sex of the calf did not seem to influence the prevalence <51 .42 1fr; for malt calves and 48.58% for females). However. the prevalence was remarkably higher among calves less than 8 months of age than 8-12 month old calves (82.14 v 17.86%). External trealment of 35 affected culves with 0.2% solution of Neguvon resulted in 100% recovery within 20 day�. INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND l\1ETH(lDS Ectoparasitcs are responsible for great economic A total of 2000 buffalo calves. varying in a�e frum losses to liveswck industry . Btsides causing great to 12 months, were examined for the pn:scncc 11! irritation and unrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancs & Ches Muscidae & Fanniidae
    The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Muscoidea, Part I by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] Version 1.0 21 December 2020 Summary This report provides a new regional checklist for the Diptera families Muscidae and Fannidae. Together with the families Anthomyiidae and Scathophagidae these constitute the superfamily Muscoidea. Overall statistics on recording activity are given by decade and hectad. Checklists are presented for each of the three Watsonian vice-counties 58, 59, and 60 detailing for each species the number of occurrences and the year of earliest and most recent record. A combined checklist showing distribution by the three vice-counties is also included, covering a total of 241 species, amounting to 68% of the current British checklist. Biodiversity metrics have been used to compare the pre-1970 and post-1970 data both in terms of the overall number of species and significant declines or increases in individual species. The Appendix reviews the national and regional conservation status of species is also discussed. Introduction manageable group for this latest regional review. Fonseca (1968) still provides the main This report is the fifth in a series of reviews of the identification resource for the British Fanniidae, diptera records for Lancashire and Cheshire. but for the Muscidae most species are covered by Previous reviews have covered craneflies and the keys and species descriptions in Gregor et al winter gnats (Brighton, 2017a), soldierflies and (2002). There have been many taxonomic changes allies (Brighton, 2017b), the family Sepsidae in the Muscidae which have rendered many of the (Brighton, 2017c) and most recently that part of names used by Fonseca obsolete, and in some the superfamily Empidoidea formerly regarded as cases erroneous.
    [Show full text]