DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Source Software and Libraries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Source Software and Libraries RESEARCH PAPER Library Science Volume : 6 | Issue : 5 | May 2016 | ISSN - 2249-555X | IF : 3.919 | IC Value : 74.50 Open Source Software and Libraries KEYWORDS Vergin plastic granules, compressive strength, coarse aggregate, cement concrete. JIGAR L. DAVE DR.SURESH L. LALWANI Ph.D RESEARCH SCHOLAR, RAI UNIVERSITY- RESEARCH SUPERVISOR, RAI UNIVERSITY- AHMEDABAD (GUJARAT) AHMEDABAD (GUJARAT) Source Software and Libraries 1. Library Automation: Open SourceSoftware .1. Koha: Integrated Library System Through the years, technology has allowed many as- Koha is a promising full featured open source ILS (integrat- pects of our lives to be enhanced and our standard ed library system) currently being used by libraries all over of living increased. The creation of the computer, cell the world. For those of you out there unfamiliar of what phone, internet and interactive software have caused an ILS is, well, it is a system of keeping track of the opera- the world to become more globalized and for informa- tions of a library - payroll, expenses, purchases, and most tion to become more accessible to the general pub- importantly, lic. As with any type of evolution, the standards of all technologies have been raised to accommodate our 2. NewGenLib new needs for information and data processing. Open NewGenLib (New Generation Library) is an Integrated Li- source software (OSS) is simply one of these evolutions. brary Automation and Networking Solution Developed by Through researching OSS, there are many pros and Verus Solutions Pvt Ltd and The Kesavan Institute of In- cons; many people and businesses who think it is the formation and Knowledge Management, India. In March best form of software, and there are others who com- 2005, NewGenLib version 1.0 was released and versions pletely disagree with all that open source software has 2.0 and 2.1 have come up later. On 9th January 2008, to offer. This paper discusses these pros and cons, posi- NewGenLib has been declared Open Source Software un- tives and negatives if you will, of the social implications der GNU GPL Licence by the Verus Solutions Pvt Ltd, Hy- of OSS. Open source software is a type of software that derabad, India. can be issue that arises when discussing open source software is the topic of OSS being network friendly. Ad- .3. Evergreen vocates claim OSS is quite networkable and according Evergreen ILS is another option when researching open to NETC.org, more than half the World Wide Web runs source ILS options. Developed by Equinox Software, Ever- on Apache, which is an open source solution . The ar- green is a robust, enterprise level ILS solution developed gument for those against OSS brings us back to the to be capable of supporting the workload of large libraries cost argument, that it is not compatible with all other in a fault-tolerant system. It too is standards compliant and networks and therefore is more expensive to operate. uses the OPAC interface, and offers many features includ- Along with low-cost and being network friendly, OSS pro- ing flexible administration, work-flow customization, adapt- vides the opportunity to customize software to peoples’ able needs. Proprietary software is designed for a specific intent and is not customizable to a person’s needs . Thus, peo- 2.Digital Library: ple who are pro-OSS argue this type of software is worth 1.Greenstone Digital Library Software its weight in gold, as it can be used to fit a very specific The Greenstone digital library software is an open-source personal or business niche without the extremely high cost system for the construction and presentation of informa- of the same type of highly specialized proprietary software. tion collections. It builds collections with different docu- In an article by Walt Scacchi, there is another issue intro- ment and metadata types. The aim of the Greenstone duced which consists of government use of open source software is to empower users, particularly in universities, software. According to Scacchi, “Open government seeks libraries, and other public service institutions, to build their to open information for public sharing, discussion, review, own digital libraries. ongoing development and refinement, and unrestricted reproduction (replication and redistribution) the “source 2. DSpace code” of the products and processes of the business of Dspace is a groundbreaking digital institutional repository government.” This is a much debated issue as people are that captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and redistributes mainly concerned with privacy if the government elected the intellectual output of a university’s research faculty in to use open source software. Advocates say that open digital formats. It manages and distributes digital items, source software from government agencies will allow the made up of digital files and allows for the creation, index- public to become more informed about the system, pro- ing, and searching of associated metadata to locate and cesses, downfalls or shortcoming, and what aspects are retrieve the items. DSpace design and developed by being done accurately and effectively by the government. 3. EPrints Eprints is an open source software package for building Open Source Software for Libraries: open access repositories that are compliant with the Open 684 X INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH RESEARCH PAPER Volume : 6 | Issue : 5 | May 2016 | ISSN - 2249-555X | IF : 3.919 | IC Value : 74.50 Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. It .3. Firefox shares many of the features commonly seen in Document Firefox is the Mozzila organizations answer to Microsoft’s Management systems, but is primarily used for institutional Internet Explorer web browser, and has taken the web by storm over the past few years as the biggest competitor 4. Fedora to IE in quite some time. Firefox offers a much more se- Fedora open source software gives organizations a flexible cure browsing experience compared to IE (mostly because service-oriented architecture for managing and delivering the majority if the population uses IE and that’s who the their digital content. At its core is a powerful digital object bad guys are targeting). The biggest draw, however, is model that supports multiple views of each digital object the modifications that can be made to Firefox through its and the relationships among digital objects. Digital objects many plug-ins, which can make using the net more con- can encapsulate locallymanaged content or make refer- structive. Firefox runs on various versions of Microsoft Win- ence to remote content. Dynamic views are possible by dows, Mac OS X and Linux. associating web services with objects. Digital objects exist within a repository architecture that supports a variety of 4. Thunderbird management functions. All functions of Fedora, both at the Thunderbird Firefox’s little brother program, Thunderbird, object and repository level, are exposed as web services. is the Mozilla foundations opensource alternative to Mi- These functions can be protected with fine-grained access crosoft’s Outlook Express. The program works exactly like control policies. This unique Outlook, providing you with a secure and safe desktop email solution. And just like Firefox, the open source pro- 3. Web Publishing: gramming community has created free add-ons to make 1. Wordpress the Thunderbird email client customized to your liking. If Wordpress started out as a quick, free, open-source so- you absolutely need a desktop email source program you lution blogging solution just a few years ago; today it is need. a perfect alternative to building a web site from scratch. In addition to being free to use (and easy to install), the 5. GIMPshop Wordpress community has exploded, with thousands of GIMPshop is a modification of the free/open source graph- users and programmers creating custom themes and plug- ics program GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP), ins to completely change the way the software looks and intended to replicate the feel of Adobe Photoshop. Its operates. The most important aspect of the software is primary purpose is to make users of Photoshop feel com- it’s easy-touse interface and content management sys- fortable using GIMP. It shares GIMP’s feature list, custom- tem. With it’s visual rich editor, anyone can publish text isability, and availability on multiple platforms, while ad- and photos to the web site. Other options include multi- dressing some common criticisms regarding the program’s ple authors (with separate log-ins), built in RSS (Real Sim- interface: GIMPshop modifies the menu structure to more ple Syndication) technology to keep subscribers updated, closely resemble Photoshop and adjusts the program’s and a comment system that allows readers to interact with terminology to match Adobe’s. In the Windows version, the sites content. A fantastic way to communicate with pa- GIMPshop uses a plugin called ‘Deweirdifyer’ to combine trons, staff, etc. Since March 2006, it supports Photoshop plugins, through a host plugin that can run on Microsoft Windows or Linux. 2. Drupal All of GIMP’s own plugins (filters, brushes, etc.) remain Drupal is another open source web publishing option that available. allows an individual or a community of users to easily pub- lish, manage and organize a wide variety of content on a 6. NVU website. Tens of thousands of people and organizations Nvu (“N-view”) is a discontinued WYSIWYG HTML editor, have used Drupal to power scores of different web sites, based on the Composer component of Mozilla Application including Community web portals, Discussion sites, Corpo- Suite and Gecko 1.7. It is a common WYSIWYG editor for rate web sites, Intranet applications, Personal web sites or Linux and is intended to be an open source equivalent to blogs, E-commerce proprietary software like Microsoft FrontPage and Macro- media HTML or CSS to use. The project was started by 4. Other Computer Programs: and sponsored by Linspire.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Emergent Team Structure to Focus Collaboration
    Using Emergent Team Structure to Focus Collaboration by Shawn Minto B.Sc, The University of British Columbia, 2005 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science The Faculty of Graduate Studies (Computer Science) The University Of British Columbia January 30, 2007 © Shawn Minto 2007 ii Abstract To build successful complex software systems, developers must collaborate with each other to solve issues. To facilitate this collaboration specialized tools are being integrated into development environments. Although these tools facilitate collaboration, they do not foster it. The problem is that the tools require the developers to maintain a list of other developers with whom they may wish to communicate. In any given situation, it is the developer who must determine who within this list has expertise for the specific situation. Unless the team is small and static, maintaining the knowledge about who is expert in particular parts of the system is difficult. As many organizations are beginning to use agile development and distributed software practices, which result in teams with dynamic membership, maintaining this knowledge is impossible. This thesis investigates whether emergent team structure can be used to support collaboration amongst software developers. The membership of an emergent team is determined from analysis of software artifacts. We first show that emergent teams exist within a particular open-source software project, the Eclipse integrated development environment. We then present a tool called Emergent Expertise Locator (EEL) that uses emergent team information to propose experts to a developer within their development environment as the developer works. We validated this approach to support collaboration by applying our ap• proach to historical data gathered from the Eclipse project, Firefox and Bugzilla and comparing the results to an existing heuristic for recommending experts that produces a list of experts based on the revision history of individual files.
    [Show full text]
  • Nurturing the Proliferation of Open Source Software
    White Paper opensource vision Nurturing the proliferation of Open Source Software 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................ii 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Challenges and opportunities....................................................................................................................................2 1.2 The wider context ......................................................................................................................................................3 1.3 Potential impact, issues and mitigating them ........................................................................................................4 2 Core strategic principles ........................................................................................................................................................6 3 Current landscape ........ .............................................................................................................................................................7 3.1 Government context..................................................................................................................................................7 3.2 EU context .....................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • CSS 2.1) Specification
    Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1 (CSS 2.1) Specification W3C Editors Draft 26 February 2014 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/ED-CSS2-20140226 Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2 Previous versions: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/ Editors: Bert Bos <bert @w3.org> Tantek Çelik <tantek @cs.stanford.edu> Ian Hickson <ian @hixie.ch> Håkon Wium Lie <howcome @opera.com> Please refer to the errata for this document. This document is also available in these non-normative formats: plain text, gzip'ed tar file, zip file, gzip'ed PostScript, PDF. See also translations. Copyright © 2011 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply. Abstract This specification defines Cascading Style Sheets, level 2 revision 1 (CSS 2.1). CSS 2.1 is a style sheet language that allows authors and users to attach style (e.g., fonts and spacing) to structured documents (e.g., HTML documents and XML applications). By separating the presentation style of documents from the content of documents, CSS 2.1 simplifies Web authoring and site maintenance. CSS 2.1 builds on CSS2 [CSS2] which builds on CSS1 [CSS1]. It supports media- specific style sheets so that authors may tailor the presentation of their documents to visual browsers, aural devices, printers, braille devices, handheld devices, etc. It also supports content positioning, table layout, features for internationalization and some properties related to user interface. CSS 2.1 corrects a few errors in CSS2 (the most important being a new definition of the height/width of absolutely positioned elements, more influence for HTML's "style" attribute and a new calculation of the 'clip' property), and adds a few highly requested features which have already been widely implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • HTML 4.01 Specification
    HTML 4.01 Specification HTML 4.01 Specification W3C Proposed Recommendation This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-html40-19990824 (plain text [786Kb], gzip’ed tar archive of HTML files [367Kb], a .zip archive of HTML files [400Kb], gzip’ed Postscript file [740Kb, 387 pages], a PDF file [3Mb]) Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/html40 Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424 Editors: Dave Raggett <[email protected]> Arnaud Le Hors <[email protected]> Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> Copyright © 1997-1999 W3C® (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Abstract This specification defines the HyperText Markup Language (HTML), version 4.0 (subversion 4.01), the publishing language of the World Wide Web. In addition to the text, multimedia, and hyperlink features of the previous versions of HTML, HTML 4.01 supports more multimedia options, scripting languages, style sheets, better printing facilities, and documents that are more accessible to users with disabilities. HTML 4.01 also takes great strides towards the internationalization of documents, with the goal of making the Web truly World Wide. HTML 4.01 is an SGML application conforming to International Standard ISO 8879 -- Standard Generalized Markup Language [ISO8879] [p.351] . Status of this document This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of this document series is maintained at the W3C. 1 24 Aug 1999 14:47 HTML 4.01 Specification This document is a revised version of the 4.0 Recommendation first released on 18 December 1997 and then revised 24 April 1998 Changes since the 24 April version [p.312] are not just editorial in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Brackets Third Party Page (
    Brackets Third Party Page (http://www.adobe.com/go/thirdparty) "Cowboy" Ben Alman Copyright © 2010-2012 "Cowboy" Ben Alman Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. The Android Open Source Project Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Des Propriétés CSS
    A Liste des propriétés CSS Voici la liste des propriétés CSS telles que décrites dans les documents de la norme CSS 2 (http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/propidx.html). Ceci incorpore donc notamment les propriétés déjà présentes en CSS 1. Tableau A–1 Index des propriétés CSS Nom de la propriété Valeurs Explications azimuth angle, left-side, far-left, Détermine la direction d'origine du son en left, center-left, center, média aural. Les navigateurs actuels ne center-right, right, far-right, gérant pas encore les restitutions vocales, on right-side, behind, leftwards, utilise pour cela des logiciels spécialisés. La rightwards, inherit plupart ne prennent pas encore en charge CSS. background Raccourci pour background-color, background-image, background-repeat, background-attachment, background-position. background- scroll, fixed, inherit Fige une image d'arrière-plan insérée avec attachment background-image. Celle-ci ne défile plus avec le contenu de l'élément auquel elle est appliquée. background-color couleur, transparent, inherit Définit la couleur de fond d'un élément. © Groupe Eyrolles, 2005 Sites et ressources 254 ANNEXES Tableau A–1 Index des propriétés CSS (suite) Nom de la propriété Valeurs Explications background-image URL, none, inherit Affiche une image d'arrière-plan pour l'élé- ment (ou la page dans le cas de la balise body). Par défaut, l'image sera répétée en damier (ou papier peint) à partir du coin supé- rieur gauche de l'élément. background- pourcentage, longueur, top, center, Positionne une image d'arrière-plan définie position bottom, left, right, inherit avec background-image. Propriété géné- ralement utilisée en l'absence de répétition (background-repeat).
    [Show full text]
  • FOSS:Fostering Knowledge, Development and Communities
    f r e e . a n d . o p e n . s o u r c e . community& n . s o u r c e . s o f t w a r e . independentmedia w a r e . f r e e . a n d . o p e n . s FOSS: Fostering a n d . o p e n . s o u r c e . s o Knowledge, e . f r e e . a n d . o p e n . s o f t w a r e . fff r e e . a n d . Development e n . s ooo u r c e . s o f t w a fff r e e . a n d . and Comme . sss ooounities u r c e . s o f t w a by Precy Obja-an n d . ooo p e n . s ooo u r c e . s o f t w a People’s Communications for Development (PC4D) may not have found new information and communications technologies empowering for grassroots women, owing to the practical constraints of equipment cost, intermittent electricity, and specialised skills and the structural constraints posed by the patriarchy project. But new ICTs are here to stay, forming the very backbone of modern communication systems, media production, trade and various services. And for intermediary groups such as women’s organisations, they are among the effective ways of pursuing advocacies and reaching out to more stakeholders. As the study noted, “[PC4D] does not ICTs have been seen as an opportunity signify that new ICTs cannot be useful in forwarding private interest, especially or empowering for grassroots women in the spirit of neoliberalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Informasietegnologie Linux Ubuntu Or Windows?
    POST LIST INFORMASIETEGNOLOGIE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LINUX UBUNTU OR WINDOWS? In this article we will look at a few of the common differences between Ubuntu and windows 8. Firstly with any software package before making decisions most people will look at what it would cost me as user to purchase it. With windows 8 you are looking at a retail price of R800 upwards, but of course as a student of Stellenbosch University, it can be purchased for a mere R180-00 from the Student IT Centre. However with Ubuntu, it’s completely free! Now let’s have a look at how they differ at first glance, Ubuntu brings their Unity look to the platform whereas Windows 8 brings there new metro look to theirs. Ubuntu is also a fairly light weight operating system compared to Windows 8 which takes up 16 to 20 GB of hard drive space compared to Ubuntu’s 4.5GB. Below is a table of a list of relevant comparisons. Feature/App Linux Windows Cost to end-user Free R800 and upwards Office application Libre & Open Office, Google docs, Libre & Open Office, Google docs, Office 365 + choices Office Web Apps, Soft maker Office Web Apps, Microsoft Office suite, Soft maker Office Space required for OS size 4.5GB OS size is 16 GB (32-bit) or 20 GB (64-bit) installation Risk of software Almost non existent Various malicious software, High risk security threats Email clients Thunderbird, Evolution, KMail, Opera Thunderbird, Evolution, Opera Mail, Pegasus Mail, Pegasus Mail, Claws Mail Mail, Claws Mail, Windows Live Mail, Office Outlook Web Browsers Google Chrome, Firefox/Waterfox,
    [Show full text]
  • Évaluation De La Valeur À L'ère Du Web: Proposition De Modèle De Valorisation Des Projets Non Marchands
    Évaluation de la valeur à l’ère du web : Proposition de modèle de valorisation des projets non marchands François Druel To cite this version: François Druel. Évaluation de la valeur à l’ère du web : Proposition de modèle de valorisation des projets non marchands. Sciences de l’ingénieur [physics]. Université d’Angers, 2007. Français. tel- 00346337 HAL Id: tel-00346337 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00346337 Submitted on 11 Dec 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ D’ANGERS ANNÉE : 2007 NUMÉRO D’ORDRE : 845 Évaluation de la valeur à l’ère du web : Proposition de modèle de valorisation des projets non marchands ÉCOLE DOCTORALE D’ANGERS THÈSE DE DOCTORAT Spécialité : SCIENCES POUR L’INGÉNIEUR Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 14 novembre 2007 à l’INSTITUT DES SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES DE L’INGÉNIEUR D’ANGERS 62, avenue Notre-Dame du Lac, Angers par FRANÇOIS DRUEL Devant le jury d’examen composé de : Messieurs : Vincent BOLY : professeur des Universités – ENSGSI – rapporteur Fabrice PAPY : maître de conférence (HDR)– UNIVERSITÉ PARIS VIII – rapporteur Simon RICHIR : professeur des Universités – ENSAM – directeur de thèse Henri SAMIER : maître de conférences – ISTIA INNOVATION – encadrant de recherche Pascal CRUBLEAU : maître de conférences – ISTIA INNOVATION – examinateur Norbert PAQUEL : professeur associé – UNIVERSITÉ PARIS VIII – examinateur LABORATOIRE PRÉSENCE-INNOVATION —ENSAM CENTRE D’ANGERS — 4, rue de l’Ermitage 53000 LAVAL 2 Je dédie ce travail de recherche à la mémoire de JEAN-PAUL NEAU, mon premier mentor.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Web Social Table Des Matières
    Le Web Social Table des matières 1 Web social 1 1.1 Historique ............................................... 1 1.2 L'évolution du web social ....................................... 1 1.2.1 Blogs et wiki ......................................... 1 1.2.2 L'art social .......................................... 2 1.2.3 Le crowdsourcing ...................................... 2 1.2.4 Le développement d'applications mobiles .......................... 2 1.2.5 Des projets de logiciels communautaires ........................... 2 1.3 Du web social à la vie réelle ..................................... 2 1.4 Bibliographie ............................................. 3 1.5 Notes et références .......................................... 3 1.6 Voir aussi ............................................... 3 2 Réseautage social 4 2.1 Histoire ................................................ 4 2.2 Applications .............................................. 4 2.3 Modèle économique ......................................... 5 2.3.1 Commerce des données ................................... 5 2.3.2 Vente d'espaces publicitaires ................................. 5 2.3.3 Cession des actifs ....................................... 5 2.4 Domaines d'application ........................................ 5 2.4.1 Réseaux internes versus réseaux externes ........................... 6 2.4.2 Services en ligne de réseautage professionnels ........................ 6 2.4.3 Réseaux sociaux d'amis de la vie réelle ............................ 6 2.4.4 Services en ligne d'ancien
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Glazman Parisweb 2016 (Punaise, Dix Ans…)
    CSS et édition WYSIWYG l'amour vache Daniel Glazman ParisWeb 2016 (punaise, dix ans…) Contenu Wysiwyg #1 Bravo, Xerox Parc, 1974 BRUNO, Hewlett-Packard, 1978 WordStar, MicroPro International, 1980 Interleaf, 1985 Grif, INRIA, 1985 NeXT !!! LisaWrite & MacWrite, Apple, 1983-1984 Contenu Wysiwyg #2 Word for Mac OS, Microsoft, 1985 WordPerfect, Corel, 1985-1986 à partir de 1994 : NaviPress, Bulldozer, FrontPage, WebMagic Author, tkHTML, Symposia, Netscape Gold, SoftQuad, … MIME richtext puis html Pourquoi si peu ? #1 Appuyez sur la touche Backspace… Pourquoi si peu ? #2 Pourquoi si peu #3 ? …foo|bar… …<span>foo</span><span>bar</span>… Est-ce que le curseur est ici ? ou encore là ? ou ici ? Avant le markup… Primitives de formatage Format « plat » Pas de pile Tout ce qui suivait un ordre « couleur rouge » était affiché en rouge Styles Wysiwyg ? Cacher la complexité des CSS et de toutes les CSS Offrir une UI intuitive et n’exigeant pas 15 ans de participation au CSS Working Group Éditer tout document Web à base de markup et CSS aussi facilement que sous Word ou DTP Implémentations US Patent 8 181 104, Adobe en partie seulement utilisée dans DreamWeaver BlueGriffon, Disruptive Innovations, 2011 (implémentation totalement indépendante) Les autres éditeurs ne vont pas aussi loin Mais pourquoi donc ? Vous éditez directement du Office Open XML ? Vous hackez le PNG dans le binaire ? Vous envoyez encore des séquences binaires à votre imprimante ? Alors pourquoi faut-il encore maîtriser CSS, qui n’est pas un langage de programmation, pour styler un document
    [Show full text]
  • Seamonkey -...::: SANUX
    RReveviisstata LINLINUXUX FFRROONTNT no.no. 0101 RRiivvereraa UrUruguauguayy OOcctubrtubree 20072007 file:///D:/Mis%20Documentos/Loot/LinuxFront/LinuxFront1/Linux%20Front/nro%20pag/pg2.bmp file:///D:/Mis%20Documentos/Loot/LinuxFront/LinuxFront1/Linux%20Front/enc&final/INTRO.png Bienvenidos !!! A Linux Front, la revista de Software Libre y Codigo Abierto de la frontera norte. Esta revista digital es una iniciativa del grupo de usuarios de Linux de la ciudad de Rivera. El grupo esta formado por cuatro estudiantes de informática que tienen como objetivo dar a conocer el software libre de mano de su representante más conocido, GNU/Linux o por medio de la presentación de software libre alternativo al propietario, como OpenOffice.org, GIMP, Gaim y muchos más. Los miembros del FLUG son: Ernesto dos Santos “seto” Alberto Cáseres “beto” Martín Castro “gafo” Wilson Rodríguez “will” y Ógopo, una criatura algo chueca y despistada de origen desconocido (tal vez virus o espía alienígena) la cual fue adoptada como mascota por el grupo. Tambien tenemos a un miembro honorario que es Martin Esteves “MartinE”. El principal hobie en informatica de los miembros es la programación. El FLUG se formo en el encuentro FliSOL realizado en la ciudad de Rivera en la escuela de informática, en el cual nos hicieron una presentación del software librex, instalamos varias distros de GNU/Linux, realizamos conexiones de redes entre Linux y Window$ y un monton de cosas mas. file:///D:/Mis%20Documentos/Loot/LinuxFront/LinuxFront1/Linux%20Front/nro%20pag/pg3.bmp Foto del primer día de vida del FLUG durante el evento FLISOL en la ciudad de rivera, algunos mienbros ya no estan y otros que se adirieron recientemente tampoco.
    [Show full text]