Social Movements and Framing Decisions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Social Movements and Framing Decisions University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 7-25-2014 Social Movements and Framing Decisions: Ecuador's Campaign for the Rights of Nature Maria Fernanda Enriquez Szentkiralyi University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Enriquez Szentkiralyi, Maria Fernanda, "Social Movements and Framing Decisions: Ecuador's Campaign for the Rights of Nature" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 575. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/575 Social Movements and Framing Decisions: Ecuador’s Campaign for the Rights of Nature María Fernanda Enríquez Szentkirályi, PhD University of Connecticut, 2014 This study investigates why and how social movements frame their campaigns in the ways they do. It explores Ecuador’s environmental movement, which framed its campaign in terms of the rights of nature. This framing decision is intriguing considering the ideological divisions within the movement, the absence of debate over the plausibility of the frame, and the multiple understandings of the meaning and implications of the rights of nature frame. Surprisingly the framing decision proposed by intellectuals within the movement was endorsed by participants without much clash and disputes. Challenging current explanations of how framing decisions are made, this study complicates the conventional claim that “alignment” (of ideas and interests) between the authors of a frame and movement participants is a necessary condition for any framing decision. The concept of “alignment” is problematic because it assumes that social movement participants understand a frame as proposed by the intellectuals who author the frame, when in reality the possible meanings, intentions, and implications of a frame are commonly interpreted differently by diverse audiences. Additionally, social movements are often fractured, with different groups having different motivations and, thus, promoting their own specific interests, which makes it unlikely that all factions within a movement align with a frame as articulated by intellectuals. i María Fernanda Enríquez Szentkirályi, University of Connecticut, 2014 Contrary to what negotiation scholars have propounded, this study also finds that clashes and disputes are not always inherent to the process of frame decision-making. As the Ecuadorian case bears out, there is an alternative explanation for how framing decisions are made, which I term “agreement without alignment.” Given the various actors involved, their unique motivations and interests, and invariable differences in the understanding of a frame, I argue that groups within a social movement need only agree or tacitly agree with a framing option when (a) the frame does not contradict their interests, (b) the groups are constrained by a common identity, and (c) the political opportunity is volatile. I differentiate between agreement and tacit agreement because sometimes movement participants may disagree with the frame but yet they do not attempt to block it, implying that they are tacitly or passively agreeing with the frame. ii Social Movements and Framing Decisions: Ecuador’s Campaign for the Rights of Nature María Fernanda Enríquez Szentkirályi M.A., University of Connecticut, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut 2014 iii Copyright by María Fernanda Enríquez Szentkirályi 2014 iv Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Social Movements and Framing Decisions: Ecuador’s Campaign for the Rights of Nature Presented by María Fernanda Enríquez Szentkirályi, B.A., M.A. Major Advisor ________________________________________________________________ Peter Kingstone Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Shareen Hertel Associate Advisor ______________________________________________________________ Cyrus Ernesto Zirakzadeh University of Connecticut 2014 v Acknowledgements (Agradecimientos) Sin la iluminación de la energía más poderosa que cada día guía mi camino, esta tesis nunca hubiera sido posible. Gracias Dios. Gracias a mi Levente por las caminatas donde tuvo la paciencia de escuchar mis ideas, de contribuir con las suyas, por leer y editar cada capítulo de mi tesis, y por empujarme a terminar lo que comencé. Gracias a mi András Rafael porque aunque está chiquito y no sabe bien lo que hace su mami, es un sol que me ilumina la vida. Gracias a toda mi familia en Quito, a mi mami, mi papá, mis hermanas Silvi, Sole y Claudia y mi hermano Santi. Tal vez mi familia nunca entendió bien lo que estudiaba en Estados Unidos, pero si saben lo difícil que a veces es la vida cuando estas en un país que no es el tuyo. Todos han sido un apoyo increíble. Gracias a mis profesores, Peter, Shareen, Ernie. Cuando llegue a UConn tuve la inmensa suerte de encontrar a estos profesores increíbles. Su compromiso, paciencia y consejo me ayudaron a comenzar y terminar este proyecto. Gracias Peter por ayudarme a identificar el “puzzle.” Tal vez no le he contado la historia a Peter, pero una que otra lágrima cayó en la biblioteca cuando mi disertación no marchaba bien: no había “puzzle.” Y por supuesto gracias a mis amigos de UConn, en especial a Yaz con quien comencé este camino hace ya varios años y con quien compartí tantos momentos buenos y malos. Un agradecimiento especial al Departamento de Ciencias Políticas de UConn, a Graduate School, y al Centro de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe de UConn por las becas recibidas para poder llevar a cabo el proyecto. Y un gracias enorme para toda la gente de Ecuador que me dio entrevistas y me colaboró con su tiempo. Muchos de ellas y ellos se sentaron conmigo por horas y me dieron luces sobre lo que sucedía en el país con los derechos de la naturaleza. Gracias a Anamaría Varea, Alberto Acosta, Camilo Martínez, Carlo Ruiz, Carlos Larrea, Carmen Barrera, Cecilia Lincango, Cesar Pilataxi, Dania Quirola, Delfín Tenezaca, Esperanza Martínez, Floresmilo Simbaña, Gustavo Prieto, Jorge León, Líder Góngora, Lourdes Peralvo, María Andrade, María vi Catalina Noroña, María Fernanda Espinosa, Mario Melo, Natalia Greene, Norman Wray, Pablo Lucio Pareces, Pablo Ortiz, Rolando Panchana, Simón Pachano, Tania Villegas, Yuri Iturralde, Antonio Gaybor, Benjamín Macas, Byron Quishpe, Carlos Zambrano, Carlos Zorilla, Cecilia Cherrez, Denis García, Diana Palacios, Ermel Chávez, Federico Koelle, Iván Morillo, Janette Ulloa, Javier Morales, Jorge Hidalgo, Pepe Rivadeneira, Luis Robalino, Luis Yanza, Manolo Morales, María Amparo Albán, Marianeli Torres, Marlon Santi, Martha Roldos, Mónica Chuji, Nancy Minga, Olindo Nastacuaz, Patricia Gualinga, Patricio Carpio, Pepe Acacho, Polibio Pérez, Ricardo Crespo, Ricardo Torres, Roció Bastidas, Rossana Manosalvas, Sigrid Vásconez, Silvia Tibi, Susan Poats, Ulbio Torres, Vicente Pólit, Vladimir Serrano, William Ochoa, Wilson Guzmán, y Yolanda Kakabadse. vii Table of Contents Chapter 1: Social Movements and Framing Decisions Chapter 2: The Argument Chapter 3: What do Rights of Nature Mean? Discourses Employed in the Frame Construction Chapter 4: Heterogeneity of the Ecuadorian Environmental Movement Chapter 5: Constructing and Endorsing the Rights-of-nature frame Chapter 6: After the Constitutional Reform Chapter 7: Conclusions viii Chapter 1 Social Movements and Framing Decisions Political Process scholars argue that social movements develop and mobilize sustained collective action when the political opportunity for social change is ripe, when the organizational and financial means are available, and also when movements frame the issues and their objectives in such a way as to motivate widespread support and participation (McAdam, McCarthy, and Zald 1996; Tarrow 1998; Tilly and Tarrow 2007). This dissertation focuses on the framing aspect of Political Process Theory, and investigates why and how social movements frame their campaigns in the ways they do, a question that social movement scholars acknowledge has received little attention despite the sophistication achieved in the framing literature (Polleta and Kai Ho 2006, 188). To begin to answer this question, I employ the case study of Ecuador’s unique environmental movement, which recently succeeded in its effort to compel the state to implement more stringent environmental standards and, thus, helped to make Ecuador the first country in the world to constitutionally recognize the rights of nature, and our correlative obligation to protect the natural world for its own sake. There is evidence that during the late 1980s and 1990s, Ecuadorian intellectuals concerned with environmental issues started to develop ideas about granting rights to nature. Yet, only in late 2007 did intellectuals within the Ecuadorian environmental movement launch a campaign championing for the rights of nature. Motivated by various eco-centric approaches of environmental ethics and law, indigenous philosophies that advocate for a harmonious relationship with nature, and symbolic cases of grassroots efforts of local communities to resist the extraction of natural resources from their 1 lands, this campaign for the rights of nature was developed in the midst of a particular political climate and also in response to a strategic political opportunity. A Constituent Assembly had been convened in Ecuador in late 2007 to draft a new constitution. Environmental movement intellectuals sought to garner
Recommended publications
  • The Amazon Sacred Headwaters: Indigenous Rainforest “Territories for Life” Under Threat
    The Amazon Sacred Headwaters: Indigenous Rainforest “Territories for Life” Under Threat Imminent new oil drilling in the western Amazon threatens the most biodiverse rainforest in the world, survival of indigenous peoples, and climate stability 2 Table of contents 5 Executive Summary 8 Introduction 10 The Amazon: A Biome on the Brink 12 The Amazon Sacred Headwaters 16 The Climate Cost of Amazon Drilling Credits 17 Rights vs. Reality lead author Kevin Koenig / Amazon Watch 20 Oil in the Amazon: A Toxic Legacy editing 23 A New Oil Boom Where the World Tyson Miller / Stand.earth Can Least Afford It Tegan Hansen / Stand.earth 30 Earth Defenders on the Frontlines photos Ivan Kashinsky 32 China’s Amazon Footprint Santiago Cornejo Caroline Bennet 33 The California Connection Bejat McCracken Lou Dematteis 34 The Banks Joke Baert Philip Godencki 38 Conclusion: A Bold Vision for A Critical Region on Our Planet report design Erika Rathje 41 References “We, the Indigenous Peoples of Ecuador and Peru together with our allies, call on the global community for solidarity, as our very survival depends on the survival of the Amazon rainforest which is under constant and unprecedented attack. While the world has awakened to the terrible fires in the Amazon, many do not know that there are also destructive plans for expanding extractive industries within the area known as the Amazon Sacred Headwaters. These plans represent an imminent threat not only to our survival, but also to global climate stability.” Indigenous Peoples’ Declaration for the Amazon Sacred Headwaters 4 Executive Summary The Amazon in Crisis exploration, while pursuing a just transition away In the summer of 2019, fires raged across the Amazon from fossil fuel dependency, to post-petroleum econ- from Brazil to Bolivia, ravaging an ecosystem already omies that elevate indigenous solutions and respect close to collapse from threats including deforestation, their rights and autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecuadorian Territory
    1 Territories of Life • 2021 REPORT ICCA Consortium 2 There are Indigenous Peoples living throughout Ecuadorian territory. However, there are regions where they have a prominent presence, for example in the Amazon and the Sierra. In the Amazon, there are the following nations: Achuar, Ai’Kofán, Waorani, Siekopai (also known as Secoya), Quijos, Andwa, Shuar, Siona, Shiwiar, Sapara, and Amazonian Kichwa (comprised of multiple autonomous peoples, including the Kichwa People of Sarayaku). The Amazon region is also home to the Tagaeri and Taromenane Indigenous peoples in isolation,3 or “peoples in voluntary isolation,” as Saraguro, Paltas, and higland Kichwa. Ecuador A national analysis on the status of territories of life several studies estimate that at least 40% of Ecuadorian territory (104.06 km) corresponds to the territories Author(s):1 Paola Maldonado, Jaime Robles, Verónica Potes of Indigenous Peoples and local communities. The 1 Paola Maldonado Council Co-chair of the theme on “Documenting Territories of Amazon is the region with the largest area of Indigenous Life” territories, representing 73% of the country’s territories Jaime Robles Verónica Potes is a lawyer and activist for human rights and collective It is estimated that at least 40% of Ecuadorian the equator in South America, it is one of the smallest territory (approximately 104,059.1 km) are territories of and most densely populated countries in the region. 2 nations. In a plurinational and intercultural state, the which is home to the country’s largest areas of tropical recognition and guarantee of territorial and collective forest in good state of conservation. The highland region rights and the rights of nature is an essential path to (Sierra Kofán, Siona, Siekopai (Secoya), Shuar (in Ecuador, 3 The Tagaeri Taromenane are isolated family groups, linguistically Wampís nation in Peru) and the Achuar in Ecuador Pueblos indígenas aislados y de reciente contacto and Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development for Community Planning
    Project Report Submitted to: Professor Susan Vernon-Gerstenfeld Ecuador Project Center By _ ____ Todd D iNoia Spirit Joseph Eduardo Mendez . Vail Mosier ___ In Cooperation With Ing. Hector Ayon Yo, Director Center of Continuing Education Dr. Alfredo Barriga, Head of Mechanical Engineering Oce. Sonia Pizzaro, Professor of Marine Sciences Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING December, 1993 This project report is submitted as partial fulfillment of the degree requirements of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of the United States Agency for International Development, the Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral of Ecuador, or the Worcester Polytechnic Institute of Massachusetts. This Report is the proict of an educational program, and it is intended to serve as partial documentation for the evaluation of academic achievement. The report should not be construed as a working document by the reader. ABSTRACT This report investigated the applications of sustainable development in Ecuador, as well as the processes and policies involved in community development. These investigations resulted in the tormulation of a methodology for co.inunity planning, which embodies the concepts of sustainable development. Existing methodologies for community development, for the introduction of environmentally conscious productive activities in communities, and for implementation of environmentally sound operations were used as tools in the development of our methodology. Too, personal experience and systematic evaluation using matrixes of criteria were utilized in definition and formuiation of our project. Effective application of this methodology may be utilized by both communities and institutions in future planning efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecuador: Justice and Protection for Amazonian Women, Defenders Of
    “THEY WILL NOT STOP US” Ecuador: Justice and protection for Amazonian Women, defenders of the land, territory and environment Amnesty International it’s a global movement of more than 7 million people working for respect and protection of human rights. Our vision is of a world in which all people enjoy the human rights set out in the las personas disfrutan de todos los derechos humanos Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religious belief. Our work is funded primarily by contributions from our members and through donations. © Amnesty International 2019 Unless stated otherwise, the content of this document is protected by Creative Commons licence 4.0 (attribution, non-commercial, no derivative works, international). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information, visit the Permissions page of our website: https://www.amnesty.org/es/about-us/permissions/. Material attributed to copyright holders other than Amnesty International is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. 2 THEY WILL NOT STOP US ECUADOR: JUSTICE AND PROTECTION FOR AMAZONIAN WOMEN, DEFENDERS OF THE LAND, TERRITORY AND ENVIRONMENT “THEY WILL NOT STOP US” ECUADOR: JUSTICE AND PROTECTION FOR AMAZONIAN WOMEN, DEFENDERS OF THE LAND, TERRITORY AND ENVIRONMENT AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 3 INTRODUCTION Throughout 2018 in Ecuador, Amnesty International recorded a series of attacks and threats perpetrated against women human rights defenders and leaders Patricia Gualinga, Nema Grefa, Salomé Aranda and Margoth Escobar, members of Mujeres Amazónicas Defensoras de la Selva de las Bases frente al Extractivismo (Amazonian Women Defending the Forest from Extractivism), also known as the Mujeres Amazónicas (Amazonian Women) collective.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Environment Facility (GEF) Operations
    LDN Target-Setting and Restoration of Degraded Landscapes in Western Andes and Coastal areas Part I: Project Information GEF ID 10184 Project Type FSP Type of Trust Fund GET CBIT/NGI CBIT No NGI No Project Title LDN Target-Setting and Restoration of Degraded Landscapes in Western Andes and Coastal areas Countries Ecuador Agency(ies) FAO Other Executing Partner(s) CONDESAN (Operating Partner) Executing Partner Type CSO GEF Focal Area Land Degradation Taxonomy Focal Areas, Land Degradation, Food Security, Sustainable Land Management, Sustainable Agriculture, Drought Mitigation, Ecosystem Approach, Sustainable Livelihoods, Integrated and Cross-sectoral approach, Income Generating Activities, Restoration and Rehabilitation of Degraded Lands, Community-Based Natural Resource Management, Sustainable Pasture Management, Improved Soil and Water Management Techniques, Land Degradation Neutrality, Carbon stocks above or below ground, Land Cover and Land cover change, Biodiversity, Biomes, Tropical Rain Forests, Paramo, Influencing models, Strengthen institutional capacity and decision-making, Convene multi-stakeholder alliances, Deploy innovative financial instruments, Transform policy and regulatory environments, Demonstrate innovative approache, Stakeholders, Communications, Awareness Raising, Behavior change, Private Sector, Capital providers, SMEs, Individuals/Entrepreneurs, Financial intermediaries and market facilitators, Indigenous Peoples, Beneficiaries, Type of Engagement, Partnership, Information Dissemination, Consultation, Participation,
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Economy of Sovereign Debt in Latin America
    Between Good Faith and Defiance: A Political Economy of Sovereign Debt in Latin America by Alfredo Hernandez Sanchez Submitted to Central European University Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Professor Julius Horvath CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2020 I, the undersigned [Alfredo Hernandez Sanchez], candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Central European University Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use was made of works of others, and no part the thesis infringes on any person's or intstitution's copyright. I also declare that no part the thesis has been submitted in this form to any other institution of higher education for an academic degree. Budapest, 10 May 2020 ||||||||||||||||| Signature CEU eTD Collection c by Alfredo Hernandez Sanchez, 2020 All Rights Reserved. Word Count ≈ 57,000 ii \We think in generalities, but we live in detail." | Alfred North Whitehead Science and Philosophy CEU eTD Collection To my loving parents CEU eTD Collection Acknowledgments \All changes, even the most longed for, have their melancholy; for what we leave behind us is a part of ourselves; we must die to one life before we can enter another." Anatole France It seems appropriate for a thesis about debt to begin by enumerating all the { very many { people to whom the author owes gratitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Pan-Amazon Region
    OAS/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 176 29 September 2019 Original: Spanish INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Situation of Human Rights of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Pan-Amazon Region 2019 iachr.org OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Situation of human rights of the indigenous and tribal peoples of the Pan-Amazon region : Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on September 29, 2019. p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L/V/II) ISBN 978-0-8270-6931-2 1. Indigenous peoples--Civil rights--Amazon River Region. 2. Indigenous peoples-- Legal status, laws, etc.--Amazon River Region. 3. Human rights--Amazon River Region. I. Title. II. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.176/19 INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Members Esmeralda Arosemena de Troitiño Joel Hernández García Antonia Urrejola Margarette May Macaulay Francisco José Eguiguren Praeli Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva Flávia Piovesan Executive Secretary Paulo Abrão Assistant Executive Secretary for Monitoring, Promotion and Technical Cooperation María Claudia Pulido Assistant Executive Secretary for the Case, Petition and Precautionary Measure System Marisol Blanchard a.i. Chief of Staff of the Executive Secretariat of the IACHR Fernanda Dos Anjos In collaboration with: Soledad García Muñoz, Special Rapporteurship on Economic, Social, Cultural, and Environmental Rights (ESCER) Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on September 29, 2019 INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 INTRODUCTION 19 CHAPTER 1 | INTER-AMERICAN STANDARDS ON INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES APPLICABLE TO THE PAN-AMAZON REGION 27 A. Inter-American Standards Applicable to Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in the Pan-Amazon Region 29 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Biomedicine and Local Knowledge in Primary Health Care
    UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Amsterdam Master's in Medical Anthropology, 2007/2008 The relation between biomedicine and local knowledge in primary health care: Experiences and strategies of the Jambi Huasihealth center, in Ecuador THESIS FOR THE AMSTERDAM MASTER'S IN MEDICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Supervisor: Professor Dr. Stuart Blume By: Maria de Ios Angeles Erazo Pesimtez SUMMARY I ABSTRACT 'This research analyse the relation between biomedicine and local knowledge (which is so­ called traditional indigenous medicine in this research) in primary health, based on the experiences and strategies of the Jambi Huasi health center, located in the Otavalo city, in the Imbabura province, Ecuador. The fieldwork took place from May 26th to July 6th of2008. The problem revealed by this research is that due to cultural and historical reasons, some indigenous people have not received health care in hospitals, clinics and more units of the formal health system (which is based primarily on biomedicine). In order to provide health care especially to those people, the Indigenous and Peasant Federation of Imbabura (FICI, in Spanish) created Jambi Huasi, more than 24 years ago. During the fieldwork, it was possible to realize that there are clear differences of opinion regarding the way in which the biomedicine and traditional indigenous medicine are related. Some interviewed people see collaboration; others, a process of subordination or incorporation of traditional indigenous medicine into a hegemonic biomedical system. The process of "Reference and counter-reference" is one of the practices that the staff of Jambi Huasi has promoted, in order to consolidate the relationship of dialogue, mutual respect and appreciation between biomedical professionals and representatives of traditional indigenous medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecuador's Experiment in Living Well: Sumak Kawsay, Spinoza and the Inadequacy of Ideas. Environment and Planning A, 49(10), 2241-2260
    Gerlach, J. (2017). Ecuador's experiment in living well: Sumak kawsay, Spinoza and the inadequacy of ideas. Environment and Planning A, 49(10), 2241-2260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17718548 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1177/0308518X17718548 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via SAGE at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0308518X17718548. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Ecuador’s experiment in living well: sumak kawsay, Spinoza and the inadequacy of ideas. Joe Gerlach University of Bristol & University of Oxford Accepted for publication by Environment and Planning A Please do not cite or circulate without permission [email protected] Abstract In April 2017 Ecuador halted the continental drift to the conservative right in Latin America by electing leftist Lenín Moreno to the Presidency. Attention has turned, therefore, to the legacy of outgoing President Rafael Correa’s decade in power. To that end, this paper examines one of Correa’s signature programmes, ‘Buen Vivir’ (Living Well), a strategic plan for development underscored by the indigenous Kichwa cosmology of ‘sumak kawsay’. Sumak kawsay is a notion that has been co-opted into policy mechanisms in an attempt to both challenge neoliberal modes of governance, and to disrupt the ontological bifurcation of nature and society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on Indigenous Peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala)
    PROJECT DOCUMENTS The impact of COVID-19 on indigenous peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala) Between invisibility and collective resistance Thank you for your interest in this ECLAC publication ECLAC Publications Please register if you would like to receive information on our editorial products and activities. When you register, you may specify your particular areas of interest and you will gain access to our products in other formats. www.cepal.org/en/publications ublicaciones www.cepal.org/apps Project Documents The impact of COVID-19 on indigenous peoples in Latin America (Abya Yala) Between invisibility and collective resistance This document was prepared by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), jointly with the regional offices of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN-Women); the International Labour Organization (ILO); the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA); the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean (FILAC), within the framework of the activities of the Regional Interagency Group on Indigenous Peoples in Latin America and the Caribbean (GIRPI). This document was prepared thanks to contributions from Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) of Germany. The boundaries and names shown
    [Show full text]
  • Work with Indigenous Nationalities
    FUNDACIÓN FONDO ECUATORIANO DE DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE (F.E.D.) CORPORATE EXPERIENCE WITH INDIGENOUS NATIONALITIES IN ECUADOR GENERAL BACKGROUND: "Foundation FED" FONDO ECUATORIANO DE DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE ", has been developing to date processes for quality certification in the exploitation of non-renewable resources with social, environmental and business responsibility, is a non-profit entity, under private civil law, protected by Ecuadorian laws, created by free and voluntary association, by persons without any legal impediment to associate and act in reference to its Statutes, which were approved by the Ministry of the Environment of Ecuador, with Ministerial agreement 045 dated April 24, 2002. For doing so, FED Foundation, for its operations inside and outside the country, is associated with several related entities, among others: Carbon Innovations Ltd which in turn has an alliance with Tricorona, with Genesis Global LLC, PACT INC and the Hale & Dorr Law Firm, Terra Carbon LLC, 33 Asset Management, ICONTEC, Terra Global Capital, Austrian- Israeli Chamber of Commerce, Nova Scotia, Zafiro Business Group, Forrest Bird Society, Global Environmental Alliance, Equitable Origin, as partners with those who develop and represent it. GENERAL BACKGROUND: Most of its work has been developed with indigenous nationalities or in the territory of such nationalities. Native Ecuadorians, are the groups of people who were present in what became Ecuador when Europeans arrived, 7% of Ecuador's population is of indigenous heritage. FED’s has worked virtually with all the indigenous nationalities and groups, and also in almost in all Ecuadorian continental territory. It has worked with human settlements in the provinces of Zamora, Napo, Pastaza, Sucumbíos, and Orellana.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc, in Ecuador?
    WHAT IS BEHIND THE ACTIONS OF THE JUNIOR [Mining Company] CORNERSTONE CAPITAL RESOURCES INC, IN ECUADOR? STATEMENT OF COMMUNITIES, INDIGENOUS ORGANIZATIONS, PEASANTS AND SOCIAL COLLECTIVES THAT DEFEND HUMAN RIGHTS AND NATURE, IN ECUADOR Ecuador, March 1, 2019 The Canadian mining exploration company Cornerstone Capital Resources Inc. is negatively affecting, with its presence and exploratory activities, several provinces of Ecuador: Carchi, Imbabura, Azuay and Loja. In the province of Imbabura, in the Cotacachi canton, this company, together with the national mining company, performs initial exploration in the Río Magdalena 1 and 2 project, located in the García Moreno parish of the Intag-Manduriacos area, in close vicinity of the Protected Forest “Los Cedros” and in the southern limit of the Cotacachi-Cayapas Ecological Reserve. Their activities are putting the aforementioned Protective Forest and dozens of species in danger of extinction, at risk. It also undermines the integrity of the “Manduriacu Reserve”. According to national media, Cornerstone and Enami staff are reassuring people that no impact occurs at the mining prospecting stage because staff simply walk between existing trails and do not require permanent camps but only temporary ones. That being said, the population has presented claims which denounce the company of cutting down native trees in the “Los Cedros” protective forest. The intervention of Cornerstone in these two projects would potentially affect the community Brilla Sol (150 inhabitants), the Magdalena Alto community (about 400 inhabitants), and even the entire parish of Cuellaje (where there are 10 communities with a total of 2,200 inhabitants) would be at risk. Other communities downstream of such concessions, including Chontal and Magdalena Bajo, fear that their water sources could be affected by the mining project.
    [Show full text]