The Historical Development of the Regional Capitals That Were the Center of the Mamluk Sultanate Since the Beginning of Their Muslim Era

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Historical Development of the Regional Capitals That Were the Center of the Mamluk Sultanate Since the Beginning of Their Muslim Era APORTACIONS THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGIONAL CAPITALS THAT WERE THE CENTER OF THE MAMLUK SULTANATE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THEIR MUSLIM ERA Ali Ahmed El-Sayed Damanhur University This chapter aims at presenting a comprehensive over- 2. The establishment of the mamluk state view of the main cities and provinces of the Mediterra- nean Sea during the Middle Ages. Thus, to be consist- Thanks to the Sultan al­Malik al­Salih Najm al­Din ent with the thematic unity of such historical structure, Ayyub (1240-1249 AD/638-647 H), the early Mam- the Mamluk Era (1250-1517 AD/648-923 H1) has luk State was established. The Mamluks supported been chosen as the best period that represents these him until he became their first ruler, and he in return main cities and provinces, in addition to the fact that allowed them to stay in a castle, in Rawdah Island in the administrative system of this era, in particular, has the Nile River, as their residence palace, hence the greatly affected the civilizational development of these name The Bahri dynasty or Bahriyya Mamluks [i.e. areas which this chapter outlines. those who live in the river]. After al­Malik al­Salih has died, the Mamluks got rid of his son Turan Shah due to his ill-treatment towards them, and the Mamluk 1. Introduction State was established May 1250 AD/Shaaban 648 H by Shajar al­Durr widow of al­Malik al­Salih then wife Once the early Muslims have opened Damascus and of al­Malik Izz al­Din Aybak. the rest of the inner cities of the Levant, Yazid ibn Abi After the Mongols have captured Bagdad 1258 Sufyan headed to open the coastal cities as well. After AD/656 H, their leader Hulagu Khan headed towards Yazid has died, his brother Muawiyah took over the the Levant, and entered Aleppo 1260 AD/ 658 H; af- ruling of these cities. He went on fortifying the coastal ter destroying it, he went to Hama, and then proceed- cities and increasing the number of the soldiers in ac- ed towards Damascus and expanded his control all cordance with the recommendations of the Muslims over the Levant. Back then, the Ayyubid Dynasty no Caliph Umar ibn Al-Khattab. However, this was not longer got the upper hand any more, as they were ei- enough. Accordingly, since 646 AD/25 H, he started ther defeated or escaped. As for the Mamluks, they had establishing a maritime fleet like the Byzantines,2 and to stand against the Mongols in order to legitimize managed to spread his control over the ports of the enrooting their existence in Egypt and the Levant Eastern Mediterranean Sea.3 Damascus was the capital alike. Undoubtedly, their victory in the battle of Ain of the Umayyad Caliphate, until the Abbasid State was Jalut has showed them as the sole defending power of established 750 AD/132 H, back then the Levant was the whole region. divided into small independent entities upon which the Seljuks and the Fatimids were fighting. Then the Crusaders invaded the coast of the Levant and took it 3. Central mamluk government in Egypt over from the Fatimids by the end of the 11th century AD/ the 5th century H. Thus, the importance of the Cairo was the headquarters of the Mamluk Sultanate, territory beyond the Jordan River (Transjordan), with and it was composed of four main centers: the Fatimid its main city Kerak, increased dramatically, and so does Cairo surrounded with the walls of the old Fatimid city; the importance of the whole coast of the Levant, until the ancient city in the same location of the ancient there were no more Crusaders in the Levant by 1291 al­Fustat; Boulaq which was once an island in the ri- AD/ 690 H. ver then became a part of Cairo especially after estab- lishing an important trading port for merchants, and The City of the Dead, or Cairo Necropolis, surround- ing The Saladin Citadel of Cairo. Accordingly, the Cairian territories were expanded during this period 1. H = Hijra, Muslim year 4 2. Abo al-Abbas Ahmad ibn Yahya al-Baladhuri, Fūtūh more than the previous eras, and it was full of various al­Buldan, ed. Abdullah Anis al-Tabbaa and Omar Anis al-Tabbaa, Cairo, without publisher, 1956, p.150. 3. Ahmed ibn Abi Yaakoub ibn Wadeh al-Yaakoubi, Ketab 4. Gaston Wiet, Cairo: City of Art and Commerce, trans. Mo- al­Būldan, ed. Michael Jan de Goeje, Leiden, E. J. Brill, 1891, stafa El-Abbadi, New York, Franklin for Publishing and Distribu- p. 337. tion 1968, p. 99-100. Ciutat mediterrànees.indb 107 15/7/20 8:45 108 ALI AHMED EL-sayed constructions; such as, the Great Mosque which was who was also known as ‘al­Sahib’ i.e. the minister who built during the rule of the second Mamluk Sultan, supervised all civilian aspects of the state; the Military al­Malik al­Z. ahir Rukn al­Din Baibars (1260-1277 Atabek who is the general commander of the army re- AD/658-676 H), on the space of 700 meters north- sponsible for all military aspects of the state; ‘al­Dawa­ west al­Futuh Gate of the city, and a New Canal which dar’ i.e. the inkwell holder who was responsible for was built in 1325 AD/725 H, during the rule of the writing the official documents and letters of the Sul- Mamluk Sultan al­Malik al­Nasir Muhammad ibn Qa­ tanate, and who played a very important role during lawun, hence the name of this canal al­Nasir Bay, the Mamluk era, in addition to many employees who which was 1200 meters to the West of the old canal. held less important positions in the state. Other than Both canals got their running waters from the Nile those public jobs, there were a number of jobs closely River.5 In fact, many of the Mamluk structures are re- related to the Sultan himself; such as, the concierge, maining until today. and ‘ras al­nawba’, i.e. the one responsible for training The Mamluks also succeeded in attracting the trade the Mamluks of the Sultan, not to mention many oth- of Eastern Mediterranean Sea to Egypt that became a er important jobs.9 main center of goods transportation, especially be- According to the vast space of the Mamluk lands, tween India and Europe; this led to increase the wealth it was necessary to divide it administratively into two of the Cairians during this period. Thus, Cairo was major sectors: Egypt and the Levant; and, in turn, able to overcome different sorts of inner conflicts and divide these two major sectors into ‘Niyaba(s)’, i.e. disputes. It was a vivid city full of vibrant lifestyles that state(s), then divide these Niyabas into divisions. As were not easily affected by devastating plagues or nat- for the Egyptian sector, it was ruled from Cairo, and it ural disasters.6 was divided into the ‘Bahri Niyaba’, i.e. near the sea, Despite the great civilizational role of the Mamluks that was ruled from Damanhour, at al­Behaira, which in history throughout 267 years, their era was full of controlled the near cities and villages; except for Alex- political instability whether during the period of The andria which had its own ruling staff due to the im- Bahri dynasty or the following Burji dynasty as well. portance of its location and the important economic This instability came as a result of the influencing po- role it played since it was the main port of the Mam- litical concepts that allowed anyone to claim the Egyp- luk Sultanate over the Mediterranean Sea;10 and the tian Throne, which lead to the unavoidable competition ‘Quebli Niyaba’, i.e. near upper Egypt, that was ruled among the Mamluk leaders who believed the throne from Asyut which controlled the near cities and villag- should be for the most powerful one of them. es till Aswan. Whereas Cairo had its own Wally, i.e. From time to time, some Mamluk leaders, aspirant governor, the Saladin Citadel had its own Wally who to the throne, translated their ambitions into military took care of its fortifications and supervised the traffic works within Cairo streets. Rebellious acts by the leaders into and out of its walls.11 of affiliated provinces in the Levant were repeated aim- ing at their independence.7 However, the ruling system of the Mamluk Sultanate guaranteed the continuance of 4. The levant niyabas the State itself irrespective of the ruling Sultan. Indeed, it represented what we call today a state of institutions. As for the second major sector of the Sultanate, i.e. the The ruling system of the Mamluk State is based on Levant, it has been under the rule of the Deputy of the a certain administrative structure: the Sultan, who is Sultan since the Seljuks, and Saladin used this position on the top of the structure, and the one who has a total as well. He divided his Ayyubid State into six inde- control over the whole Sultanate; the Abbasid Caliph pendent kingdoms.12 When Hulagu Khan captured that Baibars moved his headquarters to Cairo; the De­ puty of the Sultan who was also known as ‘al­Kafil’ i.e. 8 the responsible of the Islamic Provinces; the Vizier 9. Abu al-Abas Ahmed Ibn Ali Ibn Abdullah Al-Qalqas- handi, .sūbh Al­’Aasha fee Sen’aat Al­Enshaa, vol. xiii, Cairo, 1914, p. 118-122; Said Ashour, The Mamluk Period in Egypt and the 5.
Recommended publications
  • Muhammad Uljaytu's Conversion to Islam Key Terms
    Muhammad Uljaytu’s Conversion to Islam Seyyedeh Samira Behzadi1 After the Mongols’ invasion of Iran, no one could ever imagine that the grand children of Genghis Khan would pave the context for the growth and dissemination of Islam in later periods. Genghis Khan, himself, was a shaman and his grandsons, such as Hulagu Khan and Abaqa Khan, and Abaqa Khan’s children were Buddhists. However, they always dealt with the followers of other religions and sects with respect. The court of Hulagu Khan in Iran was always frequented by the scholars of other religions. Some of the children and grandchildren of Hulagu Khan abandoned their ancestral religion because of the necessities of their time and converted to Islam or Christianity. In this regard, reference can be made to Ghazan Khan and Muhammad Uljaytu who, because of the penetration of Muslim scholars in their courts, paid attention to Islam and Shi’ism. Ghazan Khan chose the Hanafite religion but did not formally acknowledge his conversion to Shi’ism for certain political reasons. Muhammad Uljaytu, his brother, persuaded the king to follow Shi’ism more openly for several reasons including the penetration of some Muslim scholars and Shi’iteministers and rulers, such as Allamah al-Hilli, his son Fakhr ul- Muhaqqiqin, and Amir TarmTaz, in his court and their arguments as to the superiority of Shi’ism over Sunnism. Uljaytu chose the Twelver branch of Shi’ism and, at the sometime, issued the order of reading sermons in Friday prayers in the name of the Shi’ite Imams (a) and minting coins in their names.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY in CAIRO School of Humanities And
    1 THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO School of Humanities and Social Sciences Department of Arab and Islamic Civilizations Islamic Art and Architecture A thesis on the subject of Revival of Mamluk Architecture in the 19th & 20th centuries by Laila Kamal Marei under the supervision of Dr. Bernard O’Kane 2 Dedications and Acknowledgments I would like to dedicate this thesis for my late father; I hope I am making you proud. I am sure you would have enjoyed this field of study as much as I do. I would also like to dedicate this for my mother, whose endless support allowed me to pursue a field of study that I love. Thank you for listening to my complains and proofreads from day one. Thank you for your patience, understanding and endless love. I am forever, indebted to you. I would like to thank my family and friends whose interest in the field and questions pushed me to find out more. Aziz, my brother, thank you for your questions and criticism, they only pushed me to be better at something I love to do. Zeina, we will explore this world of architecture together some day, thank you for listening and asking questions that only pushed me forward I love you. Alya’a and the Friday morning tours, best mornings of my adult life. Iman, thank you for listening to me ranting and complaining when I thought I’d never finish, thank you for pushing me. Salma, with me every step of the way, thank you for encouraging me always. Adham abu-elenin, thank you for your time and photography.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sultan, the Tyrant, and the Hero: Changing Medieval Perceptions of Al-Zahir Baybars (MSR IV, 2000)
    AMINA A. ELBENDARY AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO The Sultan, The Tyrant, and The Hero: Changing Medieval Perceptions of al-Z˛a≠hir Baybars* As the true founder of the Mamluk state, al-Z˛a≠hir Baybars is one of the most important sultans of Egypt and Syria. This has prompted many medieval writers and historians to write about his reign. Their perceptions obviously differed and their reconstructions of his reign draw different and often conflicting images. In this article I propose to examine and compare the various perceptions that different writers had of Baybars's life and character. Each of these writers had his own personal biases and his own purposes for writing about Baybars. The backgrounds against which they each lived and worked deeply influenced their writings. This led them to emphasize different aspects of his personality and legacy and to ignore others. Comparing these perceptions will demonstrate how the historiography of Baybars was used to make different political arguments concerning the sultan, the Mamluk regime, and rulership in general. I have used different representative examples of thirteenth- to fifteenth-century histories, chronicles, and biographical dictionaries in compiling this material. I have also compared these scholarly writings to the popular folk epic S|rat al-Z˛a≠hir Baybars. In his main official biography, written by Muh˛y| al-D|n ibn ‘Abd al-Z˛a≠hir, Baybars is presented as an ideal sultan. By contrast, works written after the sultan's day show more ambivalent attitudes towards him. Some fourteenth-century writers, like Sha≠fi‘ ibn ‘Al|, Baybars al-Mans˝u≠r|, and al-Nuwayr|, who were influenced by the regime of al-Na≠s˝ir Muh˛ammad, tend to place more emphasis on his despotic actions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Great Nomadic Challenges: from Chinggis Khan to Timur
    ChapterChapter 14 The Last Great Nomadic Challenges: From Chinggis Khan to Timur (A.D. 500 – A.D. 1450) The Steppe How would you characterize this region? Where is this? Steppe Culture . Loyalty to kin/clan . Courage culture . Horsemanship . Mobile (pastoralists & hunters) . Animists . Raiding between tribes . Traded with sedentary peoples for manufactured goods . Invented stirrups Mongols . Declared themselves to be descendents of Huns who founded the 1st steppe empire in late Classical era. Called “Tartars” especially by Westerners (“people from hell”), though a misnomer: Mongols conquered steppe tribe Tartars, but because so many Tartars rose to prominence in the Mongol Empire, the name became synonymous with Mongols. The Mongols . The Mongols were well known for their ability to ride horses well and wage war. Skilled in shooting short composite bows and arrows from horseback. Organized troops effectively and readily adopted new technologies, like gunpowder from China. At a meeting of Mongol leaders in 1206, a man named Temujin was Mongol Conquests elected Genghis Khan, which means strong ruler. He united Mongol tribes and conquered a vast empire that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to Eastern Europe. Genghiz Khan imposed strict military discipline and demanded absolute loyalty. His highly trained armies contained some of the most skilled horsemen in the world. In their conquest of China, the Mongol armies faced the problem of attacking walled cities. Mongol and Chinese armies used missile weapons against each other. Genghis Khan . Valued individual merit & loyalty . Fighting wasn’t honorable; winning was. So, used any means necessary to win (trickery, etc.) . Conscripted peasants: Mongols just didn’t understand peasants who seemed like grazing animals rather than real humans who ate meat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grain Economy of Mamluk Egypt by Ira M. Lapidus
    THE GRAIN ECONOMY OF MAMLUK EGYPT BY IRA M. LAPIDUS (University of California, Berkeley) Scholarly studies of the economy of Egypt in the Middle Ages, from the Fatimid through the Mamluk periods, have stressed two seemingly contradictory themes. On the one hand, the extraordinary involvement of the state in economic affairs is manifest. At different times, and in various ways, the ruling regimes of Egypt monopolized or strictly controlled certain primary or strategic products. Wood and metals, both domestic and imported, were strictly controlled to assure the availability of military supplies. Certain export products like natron were sometimes made state monopolies. So too products of unusual commercial importance were exploited, especially by the Mamluk Sultans, to gain monetary advantages. Sugar production, often in the hands of rulers and oflicials, was also, on occasion, a state monopoly. At another level, the state participated in economic activity it did not monopolize. Either the governing bureaus themselves, or elite members of the regime, were responsible for irrigation and other investments essential to agricultural productivity. In the trading sphere, though state-sponsored trading expeditions are unknown, state support for trade by treaty arrangements, by military and diplomatic protection, and direct participation in the form of investments placed with mer- chants were characteristic activities. How much of the capital of trade was "booty" or political capital we shall never know. In other spheres, state participation gave way to state controls for the purposes of taxation. Regulation of the movements of merchants, or the distribution of goods, facilitated taxation. For religious or moral reasons state controls also extended to the supervision, regulation, or prohibition of certain illicit trades.
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
    OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iqta' System of Iraq Under the Buwayhids Tsugitaka Sato
    THE IQTA' SYSTEM OF IRAQ UNDER THE BUWAYHIDS TSUGITAKA SATO* In 334 A. H. (946 A.D.), having established his authority in Baghdad, Mu'izz al-Dawla granted iqta's in the Sawad to his commanders, his asso- ciates, and his Turks. This is the formation of the so-called "military" iqta' system in the Islamic history. The appearance of the military iqta's brought about not only the evolution of the Islamic state, but also the transformation of the Iraqi society during the 10-11th centuries and of the other countries in the following periods. Nizam al-Mulk understood this as the change from bistagan (cash pay) to iqta',(1) while al-Maqrizi described as the change from 'ata' to iqta' in the same meaning.(2) As for the iqta' system under the Buwayhids, H. F. Amedroz first translated the Miskawayh's text into English with annotations,(3) and then C. H. Becker tried to realize the iqta' system in the history of 'Lehen' from the early Islamic period to the Ottoman Turks.(4) A. A, al-Duri, who studied the economic history of the Buwayhid Iraq, made clear the character of iqta' comparing it with milk (private land) and waqf, though the reality of iqta' holding remained to be investigated in future.(5) On the other hand, Cl. Cahen published the general survey of iqta' in the history of the Islamic land holding, which gave us usefull informations concerning the right and obligation of soldiers, and the fall of peasants by way of himaya (protection) and the loan at high interest.(6) We also find the general description of iqta' in the study of H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coins of the Later Ilkhanids
    THE COINS OF THE LATER ILKHANIDS : A TYPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 1 BY SHEILA S. BLAIR Ghazan Khan was undoubtedly the most brilliant of the Ilkhanid rulers of Persia: not only a commander and statesman, he was also a linguist, architect and bibliophile. One of his most lasting contribu- tions was the reorganization of Iran's financial system. Upon his accession to the throne, the economy was in total chaos: his prede- cessor Gaykhatf's stop-gap issue of paper money to fill an empty treasury had been a fiasco 2), and the civil wars among Gaykhatu, Baydu, and Ghazan had done nothing to restore trade or confidence in the economy. Under the direction of his vizier Rashid al-Din, Ghazan delivered an edict ordering the standardization of the coinage in weight, purity, and type 3). Ghazan's standard double-dirham became the basis of Iran's monetary system for the next century. At varying intervals, however, the standard type was changed: a new shape cartouche was introduced, with slight variations in legend. These new types were sometimes issued at a modified weight standard. This paper will analyze the successive standard issues of Ghazan and his two successors, Uljaytu and Abu Said, in order to show when and why these new types were introduced. Following a des- cription of the successive types 4), the changes will be explained through 296 an investigation of the metrology and a correlation of these changes in type with economic and political history. Another article will pursue the problem of mint organization and regionalization within this standard imperial system 5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Riba in Islam
    THE NATURE OF RIBA IN ISLAM By: M. Umer Chapra1 Abstrak Perdebatan masalah riba seperti tidak pernah selesai di diskusikan oleh banyak kalangan, baik akademis, organisasi keagamaan, bahkan sampai pada forum-forum intenasional. Beberapa terminologi dibahas dengan baik dalam tulisan ini yang dimulai dengan pelarangan riba itu sendiri kemudian pembagian-pembagian riba, diantaranya riba al-Nasi’ah dan riba al-Fadl, serta implikasi dari dua bentuk riba tersebut. Pembahasan didukung dengan pendapat-pendapat para ulama dan ekonom yang merujuk langsung dari ayat-ayat al-Qur’an, sampai pada perdebatan hukum. Demikian juga al-Qur’an sangat jelas membedakan antara riba dan perdagangan, namun pelarangan riba sangat jelas bahkan diperkuat dengan hadits-hadits yang dengan eksplisit melarang riba. Dijelaskan pula tentang perbedaan antara riba dan bunga bank. Islam sangat menentang bunga bank karena Islam berharap terjadinya sistem ekonomi yang mengeliminasi seluruh bentuk ketidakadilan dengan memperkenalkan keadilan antara pengusaha dan pemilik modal, yaitu berbagi resiko dan berbagi hasil. ŭ ΊņĨŧ Ώ 1 ΎỲŏΉė ΞΊẂ ĤΣΔĜŧ ΔΩė ĥ ĜẃΐĨľė Έ΅ Ή ģŊΜūΕ╬ė ĥ ĜΡĜỳΉė ΎΙā ŋķā ĤΡŊĜųĨ⅝Ϋė – ĤΣẂĜΐĨį Ϋė ĤΉėŋẃΉė ŋẃħ ĥ ĜẃΐĨĴ ΐΊΉ ĤĢŧ ΕΉĜġΛ .ĤΡĜỳΉė ΖōΙ ⅜Σ⅞ĸĨΉ ĤẃĢĨ╬ė ĥ ĜΣĴ ΣħėŏĨŦΫė ∟ ĥ ĜẃΐĨľė Ίħ ╚ġ ‛ άĨŅė ŊΜį Λ ΒΏ ĤΣĴ ΣħėŏĨŦΫė Ίħ ŏŲĜΕẂ ŋķā ΞΊẂ ⅜₤ėΜħ Ĥ╤ ªΌάŦΩėΛ ĤΣΔėŏųΕΉėΛ ĤΡŊΜΚΣΉėΛ ĤΣŦΛŋΕ▀ė ŭ ŅΧė ΞΊẂΛ ªĤΣΕΡŋΉė Η╠ė ŋ⅝ ⌠ΛΧė ĤīάĬΉė ĥ ĜΔĜΡŋΉė ẀĜĢħā ΒΏ ♥ė╙Ģ΄ ♥ĜĢΔĜį ΑĜ΄ ėŌċΛ .ŊΜ⅞ΕΉė Ŵėŏ⅝ċ ΒẂ ĤΊųĸĨ╬ė ģŋĕĜ℮Ήė ┐ŏ╡ ΜΙΛ ĜΏ ΑĈġ ĤΉŊĜľė ΑΜΉΛĜ► ΝŏŅΧė ĥ ĜΔĜΡŋΉė ẀĜĢħĈġ ΠŦĈĨΉė ∟ ╚ĢỲėŏΉė ╚ΐΊŧ ╬ė
    [Show full text]
  • Taftazani, a Commentary on the Creed of Islam
    > Commentary on the Creed of Islam NUMBER XLIII OF THE RECORDS OF CIVILIZATION SOURCES AND STUDIES AUSTIN P. EVANS, Editor Commentary on the Creed of Islam Sa'd al-T)in a on the Creed of al-T)in al-T^asaji TRANSLATED WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY EARL EDGAR ELDER MCML Columbia University Tress, COPYRIGHT 1950 BY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS, NEW YORK Published in Great Britain, Canada, and India by Geoffrey Cumberlege, Oxford University Press London, Toronto, and Bombay MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RECORDS OF CIVILIZATION SOURCES AND STUDIES EDITED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Editor AUSTIN P. EVANS, PH.D. Professor of History Advisory Board DINO BIGONGIARI, Da Ponte Professor of Italian ROBERT HERNDON FIFE, L.H.D., Gebhard Professor of the Germanic Languages and Literatures CARLTON J. H. HAYES, LITT.D., Seth Low Professor of History ROGER SHERMAN LOOMIS, B.LITT., Professor of English ROBERT MORRISON MAcIVER, LITT.D., Lieber Professor of Political Philosophy and Sociology DAVID S. MUZZEY, PH.D., Gouverneur Morris Professor Emeritus of History JAMES T. SHOTWELL, LL.D., Bryce Professor Emeritus of the History of International Relations LYNN THORNDIKE, L.H.D., Professor of History WILLIAM L. WESTERMANN, L.H.D., Professor Emeritus of Ancient History To 0. N. E. Preface URING D, recent years there has been a revival of interest in things mediaeval. The Neo-Thomist school of philosophy is but one evidence of this. Different scholars have reminded us that the Middle Ages arc not a backwater nor a bayou having little connection with the great stream of intellectual movements in our civilized world.
    [Show full text]
  • Citadel of Masyaf
    GUIDEBOOK English version TheThe CCitadelitadel ofof MMasyafasyaf Description, History, Site Plan & Visitor Tour Description, History, Site Plan & Visitor Tour Frontispiece: The Arabic inscription above the basalt lintel of the monumental doorway into the palace in the Inner Castle. This The inscription is dated to 1226 AD, and lists the names of “Alaa ad-Dunia of wa ad-Din Muhammad, Citadel son of Hasan, son of Muhammad, son of Hasan (may Allah grant him eternal power); under the rule of Lord Kamal ad- Dunia wa ad-Din al-Hasan, son of Masa’ud (may Allah extend his power)”. Masyaf Opposite: Detail of this inscription. Text by Haytham Hasan The Aga Khan Trust for Culture is publishing this guidebook in cooperation with the Syrian Directorate General of Antiquities and Museums as part of a programme for the Contents revitalisation of the Citadel of Masyaf. Introduction 5 The Aga Khan Trust for Culture, Geneva, Switzerland (www.akdn.org) History 7 © 2008 by the Aga Khan Trust for Culture. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission of the publisher. Printed in Syria. Site Plan 24 Visitor Tour 26 ISBN: 978-2-940212-06-4 Introduction The Citadel of Masyaf Located in central-western Syria, the town of Masyaf nestles on an eastern slope of the Syrian coastal mountains, 500 metres above sea level and 45 kilometres from the city of Hama. Seasonal streams flow to the north and south of the city and continue down to join the Sarout River, a tributary of the Orontes.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of St Anna's Cult in Byzantium
    ASPECTS OF ST ANNA’S CULT IN BYZANTIUM by EIRINI PANOU A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham January 2011 Acknowledgments It is said that a PhD is a lonely work. However, this thesis, like any other one, would not have become reality without the contribution of a number of individuals and institutions. First of all of my academical mother, Leslie Brubaker, whose constant support, guidance and encouragement accompanied me through all the years of research. Of the National Scholarship Foundation of Greece ( I.K.Y.) with its financial help for the greatest part of my postgraduate studies. Of my father George, my mother Angeliki and my bother Nick for their psychological and financial support, and of my friends in Greece (Lily Athanatou, Maria Sourlatzi, Kanela Oikonomaki, Maria Lemoni) for being by my side in all my years of absence. Special thanks should also be addressed to Mary Cunningham for her comments on an early draft of this thesis and for providing me with unpublished material of her work. I would like also to express my gratitude to Marka Tomic Djuric who allowed me to use unpublished photographic material from her doctoral thesis. Special thanks should also be addressed to Kanela Oikonomaki whose expertise in Medieval Greek smoothened the translation of a number of texts, my brother Nick Panou for polishing my English, and to my colleagues (Polyvios Konis, Frouke Schrijver and Vera Andriopoulou) and my friends in Birmingham (especially Jane Myhre Trejo and Ola Pawlik) for the wonderful time we have had all these years.
    [Show full text]