Legislative Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legislative Council 3903 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Thursday 27 June 2002 ______ The President (The Hon. Dr Meredith Burgmann) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. The President offered the Prayers. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN Report The President announced, pursuant to the Ombudsman Act 1974, the receipt of a special report entitled "Speedometers and Speeding Fines—A Review of Police Practice", dated June 2002. The President announced that she had authorised that the report be made public. PRESIDENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL PERSONAL DOCUMENTS THEFT The PRESIDENT: Since becoming President, I have allowed the President's Dining Room to be used by all members of Parliament for community and other purposes. During one of these functions documents were stolen from my staff member's desk. Among them were my personal banking records. On 27 May I was approached by a member of the parliamentary press gallery saying that he had been shown my personal banking records amid allegations that I was using my credit card to pay for official functions in order to gain frequent flyer points. I explained that these were my personal dining room accounts and had nothing to do with my official status as President. I have since ascertained that a considerable number of parliamentarians pay their parliamentary dining room bill by credit card. I have asked the Clerk of the Parliaments to institute an inquiry into the theft of the documents, and have called for the videotapes of that part of the Parliament to be analysed. On Thursday 20 June another member of the press gallery contacted me and told me that the same documents, including my personal banking records, had been left on their seat in the press gallery. I explained to the journalist that no taxpayers' money was involved, and that journalist also concluded that there was no issue. I commend the members of the press gallery, who have behaved totally ethically in contacting me. I am sure they did not know that the documents were the result of a theft. If analyses of the tapes are conclusive, I will certainly press charges against whoever stole these documents and abused my hospitality in such a way. STANDING COMMITTEE ON PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE AND ETHICS Report: Person Referred to in the Legislative Council (Councillor D. Jones) The Hon. HELEN SHAM-HO [10.10 a.m.]: I move: That the House adopt report No. 17 entitled, "Report on person referred to in the Legislative Council (Councillor D. Jones)", dated June 2002. Ms LEE RHIANNON [10.11 a.m.]: I wish to place on the record that the Greens respect and appreciate the citizen's right of reply process. It is important for citizens to have an avenue if they have been aggrieved by a statement made under privilege. Mr Jones is entitled to his reply, and the Greens are not seeking to impede it. I have only brief comments to make on his reply. In his statement in reply, Mr Jones does not introduce any new information or a detailed rebuttal of my original speech. There is little to respond to. I certainly stand by the comments I have made in this House on previous occasions, and the Greens will continue to work to address the wave of complaints emanating from the ratepayers of Warringah. One specific point with which I must take issue, however, is that Mr Jones has stated that I "alleged the serious claims of … complicity in the death of a developer …" Anyone who reads my original speech will see that this is absolutely not the case. I referred to the tragic death of a local developer, and I deliberately stated that the police ruled his death to be a suicide. His death occurred in the midst of the other events that I described. 3904 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL 27 June 2002 This is quite different from accusing Mr Jones of being complicit in his death. I have no information to indicate that his death was other than suicide, and I have never suggested otherwise. I believe that it is quite irresponsible, and displays a callous attitude towards the family of the deceased, to misconstrue my comments in this manner. The Hon. HELEN SHAM-HO [10.13 a.m.]: I will reiterate to Ms Lee Rhiannon that in matters of a citizen's right of reply the Committee does not judge the truth or otherwise of a statement made by honourable members or persons. To be fair to Mr Jones, part of his response to this House states: I respectfully submit that the allegations are untruthful and without any foundation, and I deny categorically that I have had any involvement in the actions alleged or indeed have any prior knowledge of the allegations. In relation to bribery of Councillors, the Independent Commission Against Corruption has not brought this matter to my attention at any time in the past. The Commission has advised there are no investigations being conducted into the allegations by the Honourable Lee Rhiannon. In relation to complicity in the death of a developer, the NSW Police Service has not been asked to conduct an investigation into the matter and the Service has advised there is no investigation in relation to the allegation. As to the claim of intimidation and harassment of residents, as Mayor and Councillor I seek to guide any resident who comes to me for assistance. I deny any intimidation or harassment of any person. As to obstruction and delay of development applications, I endeavour to assist any person who seeks to invest in our area. My Council has an excellent reputation in facilitating economic growth and statistics released annually by the Department of Local Government show Warringah as having the best processing times for development applications amongst those councils on the northern beaches peninsula. Motion agreed to. Pursuant to the resolution the response of Councillor Jones was incorporated. ______ In accordance with paragraph 1 of the Legislative Council resolution of 13 November 1997 I make this submission on the basis that my good reputation and dealings and associations with others have been adversely affected by the statements made to the Legislative Council by the Honourable Lee Rhiannon MLC on 9 April 2002. The Honourable Lee Rhiannon alleged the serious claims of bribery of councillors, complicity in the death of a developer, intimidation and harassment of residents, and obstruction and delay of development applications and named me as being associated with these actions. I respectfully submit that the allegations are untruthful and without any foundation, and I deny categorically that I have had any involvement in the actions alleged or indeed have any prior knowledge of the allegations. In relation to bribery of Councillors, the Independent Commission Against Corruption has not brought this matter to my attention at any time in the past. The Commission has advised there are no investigations being conducted into the allegations by the Honourable Lee Rhiannon. In relation to complicity in the death of a developer, the NSW Police Service has not been asked to conduct an investigation into the matter and the Service has advised there is no investigation in relation to the allegation. As to the claim of intimidation and harassment of residents, as Mayor and Councillor I seek to guide any resident who comes to me for assistance. I deny any intimidation or harassment of any person. As to obstruction and delay of development applications, I endeavour to assist any person who seeks to invest in our area. My Council has an excellent reputation in facilitating economic growth and statistics released annually by the Department of Local Government show Warringah as having the best processing times for development applications amongst those councils on the northern beaches peninsula. ______ STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Report The Hon. Tony Kelly, as Chairman, tabled report No. 25 entitled "Redevelopment and Remediation of the Rhodes Peninsula", dated June 2002, together with minutes of proceedings, transcripts of evidence, submissions and correspondence. Report ordered to be printed. The Hon. TONY KELLY [11.16 a.m.]: I move: That the House take note of the report. Debate adjourned on motion by the Hon. Tony Kelly. PUBLIC SECTOR EMPLOYMENT AND MANAGEMENT BILL Second Reading Debate adjourned from 26 June. Ms LEE RHIANNON [10.17 a.m.]: This bill repeals the existing Public Sector Management Act 1988 and replaces it with new legislation to regulate the public sector. The Greens will not oppose the bill. We understand that the Government engaged in genuine consultation with the relevant unions, including the Public 27 June 2002 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL 3905 Service Association and the Labor Council of New South Wales, and that their opinions are to some extent reflected in the version of the bill that is now before this Parliament. Consultation with the legitimate representatives of the public sector work force is important as this bill will have a far-reaching impact on fundamental working conditions such as discipline, the movement of staff across the public sector and the employment of temporary and casual employees. While the Greens do not oppose this bill, we have some concerns in respect of a number of these changes and also in respect of opportunities lost by this bill. The Greens accept the need to manage conduct and performance, and to establish disciplinary procedures to protect the public interest. However, we are committed to the rights of all workers, including public sector workers, to fair and reasonable treatment and to their right to be protected from management harassment and persecution. Specifically, we are concerned that the objectives of part 2.7 of the bill, which refers to management of conduct and performance, do not seek to protect the rights of workers, against, for example, false and vexatious accusations, harassment or bullying.
Recommended publications
  • Attitudes to Recreational Use of Rural Properties
    Attitudes to recreational use of rural properties A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation by Elaine Barclay October 2004 RIRDC Publication No 04/123 RIRDC Project No UNE-84A INCORPORATING THE FORMER RURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTRE University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 © 2004 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 031 7 ISSN 1440-6845 Attitudes to recreational use of rural properties Publication No. 04/123 Project No. UNE-84A The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details Elaine Barclay The Institute for Rural Futures, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 Phone: (02) 67735141 Fax: (02) 67733245 Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form. RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in October 2004 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint ii Foreword Attitudes of landholders are of fundamental importance in determining the area available to the general public for outdoor recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Megafauna in a Continent of Small Game: Archaeological Implications of Martu Camel Hunting in Australia’S Western Desert
    Quaternary International 297 (2013) 155e166 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint Megafauna in a continent of small game: Archaeological implications of Martu Camel hunting in Australia’s Western Desert Douglas W. Bird a,*, Brian F. Codding b, Rebecca Bliege Bird a, David W. Zeanah c, Curtis J. Taylor d a Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Bldg. 50, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA b Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, 270 S. 1400 E., Rm. 102, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA c Department of Anthropology, California State University, Sacramento, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA d Parnngurr Aboriginal Community, LMB 598, Newman, WA 6753, Australia article info abstract Article history: Archaeologists often assume that large ungulates are inherently highly ranked prey because of their size, Available online 14 January 2013 especially attractive to hunters using sophisticated capture technologies common after the late Pleis- tocene. Between 1840 and 1907, over 10,000 dromedary camels were imported to Australia, and today feral populations number well over a million. Although contemporary Aboriginal hunters in Australia’‘s Western and Central Deserts regularly encounter camels, they rarely pursue them. We present data on camel encounter and pursuit rates, with comparisons of energetic search and handling efficiency relative to other foraging options among Martu, the Traditional Owners of a large region of the Western Desert. We then explore some hypotheses concerning the determinants of prey rank and the technological and social contexts that influence resource value. In some respects the case runs counter to common ex- pectations about hunting large ungulates, and highlights the special kinds of opportunity costs that large game acquisition might entail in many contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • New Animal Products
    RIRDC Completed Projects in 2002 - 2003 and Research in Progress as at June 2003 Sub Program 1.2 NEW ANIMAL PRODUCTS July 2003 RIRDC Publication No 03/59 © 2003 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 5862 8 ISSN 1440 6845 "RIRDC Completed Projects in 2002 - 2003 and Research in Progress as at June 2003 - 1.2 New Animal Products" Publication No 03/059 The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquires concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. RIRDC New Animal Products Research Manager Dr Peter McInnes RIRDC Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 08 8556 7331 Fax: 08 8556 7289 Email: [email protected] RIRDC Publications Manager Cecile Ferguson Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 3186 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in July 2003 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Canprint Foreword The following report contains all entries from continuing and completed New Animal Products research projects funded by RIRDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Safari Hunting of Australian Wild Exotic Game—Extension Establishment of a Peak Body for the Industry
    Safari Hunting of Australian Wild Exotic Game—Extension Establishment of a peak body for the industry by G.McL. Dryden, S.G. Craig-Smith and C. Arcodia October 2007 RIRDC Publication No 07/161 RIRDC Project No UQ-116A © 2007 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 556 4 ISSN 1440-6845 Safari Hunting of Australian Wild Exotic Game—Extension: Establishment of a peak body for the industry Publication No. 07/161 Project No. UQ-116A The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Assessment of the Human-Facilitated Colonization History of Black Swans in Australia and New Zealand
    A genetic assessment of the human-facilitated colonization history of black swans in Australia and New Zealand Citation: Montano, Valeria, Van Dongen, Wouter F. D., Weston, Michael A., Mulder, Raoul A., Robinson, Randall W., Cowling, Mary and Guay, Patrick-Jean 2018, A genetic assessment of the human-facilitated colonization history of black swans in Australia and New Zealand, Evolutionary applications: evolutionary approaches to environmental, biomedical and socio- economic issues, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 364-375. DOI: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12535 © 2017, The Authors Reproduced by Deakin University under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence Downloaded from DRO: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30106123 DRO Deakin Research Online, Deakin University’s Research Repository Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B Received: 15 March 2017 | Accepted: 15 August 2017 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12535 ORIGINAL ARTICLE A genetic assessment of the human- facilitated colonization history of black swans in Australia and New Zealand Valeria Montano1* | Wouter F.D. van Dongen2,3,4* | Michael A. Weston2,3 | Raoul A. Mulder5 | Randall W. Robinson4 | Mary Cowling4 | Patrick-Jean Guay4 1School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK Abstract 2Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia Movement of species beyond their indigenous distribution can fundamentally alter the 3School of Life and Environmental Sciences, conservation status of the populations involved. If introductions are human- facilitated, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Faculty introduced species could be considered pests. Characterizing the colonization history of Science, Engineering and the Built Environment, Burwood, Vic, Australia of introduced species can therefore be critical to formulating the objectives and na- 4Institute for Sustainability and ture of wildlife management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-630 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEA TURTLE BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION 17 to 19 February 2009 Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Compiled by: Lisa Belskis, Mike Frick, Aliki Panagopoulou, ALan Rees, & Kris Williams U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, Florida 33149 May 2012 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-630 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEA TURTLE BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION 17 to 19 February 2009 Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Compiled by: Lisa Belskis, Mike Frick, Aliki Panagopoulou, ALan Rees, Kris Williams U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE John Bryson, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Samuel Rauch III, Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries May 2012 This Technical Memorandum is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or similar special-purpose information. Although the memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editorial control or detailed editing, they are expected to reflect sound professional work. NOTICE The NOAA Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend or endorse any proprietary product or material mentioned in this publication. No references shall be made to NMFS, or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would indicate or imply that NMFS approves, recommends or endorses any proprietary product or material herein or which has as its purpose any intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be use or purchased because of NMFS promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Stitlyjohibited Fire Destroys
    For Household Keroovola Phan* 821 COAL! coal: - Burt’s Padded Vans Hall & Walker 735 P NDORA ST. 1232 Government Street Prompt Attention, Experienced Men Residence Phone R710. TELEPHONE 83, V’UL. 51. VICTORIA, B. c., THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 1911. NO. 139. T TO-DAY’S BASEBALL NORTHWESTERN LEAGUE At Seattle—First inning; Tacoma. QUITE IT HOME "NETEMERE” DECREE 1; Seattle. 4. Second inning: Tacoma, 0; Se­ attle, 1. Batteries—Hall and Burns; Zackert RESOLUTION PASSED and Shea. NOVA SCOTIA STILL SPENDING ENJOYABLE At Portland—First inning.: Spokane, BY PRESBYTERIANS 1; Portland, 0. TRUE TO LIBERALISM TIME IN METROPOLIS Batteries — Schwenk and Ostdlekr j______ Bloomfield and Bradley. --------AMtlttCAN LEAGUE " Col. McLean and Officers of Vote of ChurcfT’Memb'ers'oh" At Washington— R. H. E. Government Holds 27 Out of Question of Union to Be St. Louis .................................7 1,5 1 38 Seats, Some by In­ Contingent Entertain Dis­ Washington ............ ...................g il l tinguished Party Taken on March 15 Batteries — Powell and Hatnllton, creased Majorities Clarke ; Hughes, Groom and Street. At New York-.—' R. E. Halifax. N. S.. June 15.—After London. June 15 —To-day is another Ottawa, June IB.—The Presbyterian General A»sembl> continued the dis­ Detroit ............'...............................o twenty-nine . year# of capable and day of glorious sunshine tempered by cussion on Church Union to-day, it New York ................... .. *............ 5 dean government at the hands of the a fresh breeze, and those who have being decided that the vote of mem­ Batteries—Mullln and Casey, liberal party Nava Scotia yesterday not -been tempted away by the Gold bers and adherents be taken on March age; Fisher and Sweeney.
    [Show full text]
  • LEC Judicial Newsletter Volume 12 Issue 3 October 2020
    Land and Environment Court of NSW October 2020 Volume 12 Issue 3 Judicial Newsletter Legislation Legislation Statutes and Regulations• o Planning Statutes and Regulations: o Land and Environment Court’s Jurisdiction • o Local Government Planning: o Biodiversity o Water Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (COVID-19 Prescribed Pollution Period) Regulation 2020 commenced 18 September 2020. The object of this o Regulation was to extend the period during which Ministerial exemptions from o Miscellaneous provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 may have Bills been made in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. State Environmental Planning Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (St Leonards and Crows Policies [SEPP] Nest Special Contributions Area) Order 2020 commenced on 31 August 2020. State Environmental Planning The object of the Order was to create a special contributions area consisting of Policies [SEPP] Amendments certain land in St Leonards and Crows Nest. Civil Procedure Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Sydney Metro West) COVID-19 Response Order 2020 commenced 16 October 2020. The object of this Order was to declare Judgments certain development for the purposes of the Sydney Metro West Project to be State significant infrastructure and critical State significant infrastructure. The United Kingdom Supreme Court relevant development included the construction and operation of new passenger Victorian Court of Appeal rail infrastructure between Westmead and the central business district of Sydney New South Wales Court of and the modification of existing rail infrastructure. Appeal Residential Apartment Buildings (Compliance and Enforcement Powers) Act 2020 Supreme Court of New South commenced on 1 September 2020. The object of this Act was to prevent Wales developers from carrying out building work that may have resulted in serious Land and Environment Court of defects to building work or result in significant harm or loss to the public or current New South Wales or future occupiers of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Against the Wind E B E R H a R D a R N O L D a N D T H E B R U D E R H O F
    Against the Wind E B E R H A R D A R N O L D A N D T H E B R U D E R H O F Markus Baum Foreword by Jim Wallis Original Title: Stein des Anstosses: Eberhard Arnold 1883–1935 / Markus Baum ©1996 Markus Baum Translated by Eileen Robertshaw Published by Plough Publishing House Walden, New York Robertsbridge, England Elsmore, Australia www.plough.com Copyright © 2015, 1998 by Plough Publishing House All rights reserved Print ISBN: 978-0-87486-953-8 Epub ISBN: 978-0-87486-757-2 Mobi ISBN: 978-0-87486-758-9 Pdf ISBN: 978-0-87486-759-6 The photographs on pages 95, 96, and 98 have been reprinted by permission of Archiv der deutschen Jugendbewegung, Burg Ludwigstein. The photographs on pages 80 and 217 have been reprinted by permission of Archive Photos, New York. Contents Contents—iv Foreword—ix Preface—xi CHAPTER ONE 1 Origins—1 Parental Influence—2 Teenage Antics—4 A Disappointing Confirmation—5 Diversions—6 Decisive Weeks—6 Dedication—7 Initial Consequences—8 A Widening Rift—9 Missionary Zeal—10 The Salvation Army—10 Introduction to the Anabaptists—12 Time Out—13 CHAPTER TWO 14 Without Conviction—14 The Student Christian Movement—14 Halle—16 The Silesian Seminary—18 Growing Responsibility in the SCM—18 Bernhard Kühn and the EvangelicalAlliance Magazine—20 At First Sight—21 Against the Wind Harmony from the Outset—23 Courtship and Engagement—24 CHAPTER THREE 25 Love Letters—25 The Issue of Baptism—26 Breaking with the State Church—29 Exasperated Parents—30 Separation—31 Fundamental Disagreements among SCM Leaders—32 The Pentecostal Movement Begins—33
    [Show full text]
  • Recipient: Senate Committee
    Recipient: Senate Committee Letter: Greetings, I would like to express my deep concern over the proposed introduction of so-called 'Ag Gag' laws - Criminal Code Amendment (Animal Protection) Bill 2015. These laws are nothing more than an attempt to protect those who abuse animals (both illegally, and within industry standard guidelines) and prevent consumers from making informed choices regarding what practices they choose to support. We do not need laws that punish and criminalise animal cruelty investigators. I believe the current laws are more than sufficient to protect private citizens from alleged trespassers and that the introduction of ‘Ag Gag’ laws would only serve to protect industries that for too long have freely gotten away with animal abuse. The public has every right to be aware of what they choose to participate in, and it is only through the efforts of animal activists that they are able to do so. I implore you to protect the right of the public to know the truth by opposing the introduction of Ag Gag laws. Comments Name Location Date Comment Renate McLaughlin Melbourne, GU 2015-03-09 I totally believe in supporting animals connie tonna Georgetown, SC 2015-03-09 This is Shameful - even with laws protecting the animals they still undergo severe abuse - if this law is passed the animals will have no protection whatsoever. Janet Veevers Australia 2015-03-09 Animals have, to our great shame, very little protection in law on Australia. We need more protection for animals and more stringent punishments for their abusers. We are not a third world country so why is the Senate considering something that will put us alongside them? Karen wall Melbourne, VIC 2015-03-09 How disgraceful that you would consider making it a crime to bring attention to any form of animal cruelty.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Welfare and Ethics from Principles to Practice
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 RSPCA AUSTRALIA Scientific SEMINAR Animal welfare and ethics From principles to practice Tuesday 28 February 2012 National Convention Centre Canberra RSPCA Australia gratefully acknowledges the financial support for the 2012 Scientific Seminar from Commonwealth Government through a grant-in-aid administered by the Department of Finance and Deregulation PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 RSPCA AUSTRALIA SCIENTIFIC SEMINAR Animal welfare and ethics: From principles to practice Tuesday 28 February 2012, National Convention Centre, Canberra DISCLAIMER The views expressed in these proceedings are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the policies or positions of RSPCA Australia. RSPCA Australia policies can be viewed at www.kb.rspca.org.au Published by RSPCA Australia Inc RSPCA Australia PO Box 265 Deakin West ACT 2600 Australia Tel: +61 2 6282 8300 Fax: +61 2 6282 8311 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rspca.org.au © RSPCA Australia Inc 2012 This work is protected by copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for personal, non-commercial use. Contents Introduction Setting the scene (abstract only) Simon Longstaff 5 Papers For the love of lab rats: kinship, human-animal relations and good scientific research Simone Dennis 7 Recreational, conservation and traditional hunting – The ethical dimensions Dominique Thiriet 12 Teaching animal welfare and ethics: from principles to practice Teresa Collins 20 Animal welfare research: the funding dilemma (abstract & presentation only) Clive Phillips 25 Welfare and ethics in companion animal breeding: An opinionated perspective Richard Malik 29 The interaction of ethical questions and farm animal welfare science Peter Sandøe 35 Pain, death and concern for animal life John Hadley 45 Poster abstracts When animal welfare science fails policy-makers: the need for a new framework for decision-making Raf Freire & Emma Rush 49 Pain and pain alleviation in pigs – A producer perspective Rebecca L.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Hunting Stance E Rebuffed C T by SSAA AUSTRALIA
    N O AUSTRALIAN SHOOTERS JOURNAL R TheASJ political voice of the SSAA E S P Anti-hunting stance E rebuffed C T by SSAA AUSTRALIA 2018 Vol. 15 Issue 1 www.ssaa.org.auAustralian Shooters Journal 1 Members-only insert to the Australian Shooter In this issue ASJThe political voice of the SSAA Staff CEO-Chief Editor Tim Bannister, Editor Allan Blane, Associate Editor Thomas Cook, Assistant Editor Dave Rose, Chief of Staff Jennifer Martens, Art Director Mike Barr, Production Coordinator Judy Ward, Graphic Designer Natalie Kuhlmann, Communications Officer Sam Talbot, Advertising Representative Karoline Minicozzi, Administration Debbie Wing. PO Box 2520, Unley, SA 5061 3 A message from SSAA National President Geoff Jones Phone: 08 8272 7100 Fax: 08 8272 2945 Internet: www.ssaa.org.au 4 Recreational hunting and animal welfare - An RSPCA Email: [email protected] Australia (mis)information paper Distributed to 191,000 members Australia-wide. The ASJ is owned and published by the Sporting Shooters’ Association of Australia Inc. Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy of this Association. Contributions: Freelance contributions are welcome. We do, however, recommend that potential authors contact the office prior to story drafting. No responsibility can be accepted for errors and/or omissions. No text or photographs within the ASJ may be republished, either electronically or in print, without the express written permission of the SSAA. Copyright 2018. The Australian Shooters Journal is published periodically and is printed by Genii, Brookvale, NSW. The Sporting Shooters’ Association of Australia Inc (SSAA Inc) is subject to the provisions of Unrealistic path to utopia the National Privacy Act.
    [Show full text]