T
Date: November 2, 2016
To: Mayor and City Council
CC: Brian Snyder
From: Randy RandaiiL;~-'
Subject: Prado Follow-up Materials
At the request of the Finance Committee, attached you will find the following additional information relating to the Prado Exhibit and the proposed involvement of the City through TOURISM Santa Fe.
1. Information relating to the roles of the participating organizations.
2. Timeline
3. The proposed event budget.
4. Proposed exhibit layout in Cathedral Park.
The Finance Committee also requested written documentation from Mr. Jim Long as to the commitment for the additional funding requirement shown in the budget. Mr. Long is out of the country and I am not able to make the request at this time. I have discussed this with the City Attorney and she feels confident that with a PSA outlining the City's involvement and financial responsibility along with a requirement that City funding through TOURISM Santa Fe only be made after other funding has been obtained for the exhibit will sufficiently protect the City for any obligation beyond what is currently envisioned. The PSA will bind Mr. Long to the commitment to raise the required funds and the City will not have any direct agreement for services with the museum. The PSA will also stipulate that the event is free to the public.
The final request from the Finance Committee was for information on the fund balance that may be used for the $75,000 which will be provided by Adam Johnson.
1 RANDALL, RANDY
From: David Setford
Meeting of Prado Exhibition/Summer ofInternational art Steering Group
September 14th, 2.30 pm, at Santa Fe Tourism
Present: Jim Long, Randy Randall, Chris O'DonnelL David Setford
(1) Roles. Further to the document previously circulated by David Setford it was agreed that:
* Chris O'Donnell would be responsible for all aspects of preparation, transport, installation and design of the exterior exhibit (design in consultation with all parties including City/Railyards) * Fiscal agent. If possible SCAS would be fiscal agent for grants, if not Jim Long's Cultural Foundation * Ads, placement ofPR, website, etc, would be the responsibility of Cynthia Delgado and John Feins (Santa Fe Tourism). Randy would ask John Feins to secure domain name pradosantafe.com. * David Setford would coordinate all efforts including ancillary "partners", materials to Cynthia Delgado/John Feins, liaison with New Mexican regarding insert,opening celebrations, etc * Jim Long would take charge of all fundraising * Randy Randall and where appropriate David Setford would liaise locally with City and Railyards
(2) Ancillary Programs. David Setford described positive reaction from local institutions (Opera, O'KM, Museum of Fine Arts, SCAS, Botanical Garden, Folk Art Museum, etc) regarding taking part in a wider program which would be publicised along with the Prado and which would create even greater draw to the City of Santa Fe. TITLE: Summer of International Art featuring Prado Museum in Santa Fe. David was contacting all institutions for written details of programs and photographs.
(3) Budget (see attached). Changes were made to the preliminary budget submitted by David Setford to reflect greater income and greater expenditure in particular on Advertizing & PR
(4) Jim Long reported a meeting with Albert Gallegos (Honorary Consul of Spain in Santa Fe) and Fred Mondragon (Honorary Consul of Spain in Albuquerque) who had committed to helping to involved American and International corporations as partners and funders. Fred would approach the legislature, while Albert would approach Ambassadors.
(5) Site visits. The Group adjourned to the Railyards and met with representatives who gave a tour of the areas where the Prado installation could be placed. While two small areas North of the station were deemed unacceptable, the larger areas either side ofthe tracks and roughly opposite REI, Verizon, Violet Crown, were seen as most appropriate.
The group then merged to Cathedral Park. The group felt that this Park was a beautiful and appropriate setting though the plaza and the Railyards were perhaps more lively. One suggestion was that the exhibition could start in the plaza (May - early July); move to the Cathedral Park for two months; and then finish up in the Railyards for September/October.
1
2 Chris felt that impact would be lost having the Prado exhibit in three separate location at different times. He suggested as an alternative having it placed for the entire run of May - November in Cathedral Park. The group decided this was worth investigation. David Setford would engage a photographer to make a study of Cathedral Park to send to the Prado.
The meeting ended at 4.30 pm.
Sent from my iPad
2
3 International Art Summer in Santa Fe, 2017
(As of 8/15/16. Not for publication at this time. Awaiting further replies and participants}
FEATURING:
The Prado Museum in Santa Fe. This breathtaking display will represent the first time that an outdoor exhibition of life size reproductions of the most famous works at the Prado Museum in Madrid has travelled to the USA. Including approximately 100 works, the exhibition will be shown on and around the Plaza and at The Santa Fe Railyard. The Prado collection features masterpieces by Spanish, Italian and Northern/Netherlandish artists from the Renaissance through to the beginning of the twentieth century. Sponsored by The Spanish Colonial Arts Society, the City of Santa Fe and Heritage Hotels.
And including:
Exhbitions:
Mirrror, Mirror: photographs of Frida Kahlo by the leading international photographers of the twentieth century. The Museum of Spanish Colonial Art will feature this exhibition including Images from Mexico City and New York City, which reveal intimate moments from Frida's life that helped Kahlo find the conception of herself that she used in her paintings. The collection has travelled nationally and internationally and has been shown to critical acclaim at the National Portrait Gallery in London, The Mexican Cultural Institute in New York City, and the Art Gallery of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.
O'Keeffe Abroad. O'Keeffe is often represented as a painter of New York and New Mexico. The Georgia O'Keeffe Museum will highlight a group of paintings by O'Keeffe made in Mexico, Hawaii, and other destinations out of the lower 48 (to be finalized).
Arlo and Dan Namingha, international artists based in Santa Fe, will be featured in the summer exhibition of the Santa Fe Botanic Garden, including work that was recently featured in the Venice Biennale. The Garden will also be featuring its expansion where the influence of Spain on Native horticulture, plants and landscapes will be highlighted.
Lines of Thought: Drawing from Michelangelo to Now from The British Museum, will be featured at the New Mexico Museum of Art. Prints and drawings by artists as diverse and important as Leonardo da Vinci, Albrecht Durer, Michelangelo, Cezanne, Rembrandt, Henry Moore and Piet Mondrian will give New Mexicans and visitors to the state an unheard of opportunity to see some of the rarer and more delicate treasures of the British Museum, highlighting the important place held by drawing in the artistic process throughout the centuries.
FLAMENCO-from Spain to New Mexico is the most comprehensive exhibition to celebrate and study this living tradition as an art form. The exhibition runs through September 10, 2017 at the Museum of International Folk Art. More than 150 objects are featured, among them, items once used by renowned artists Encarnacion Lopez y Julvez "La Argentinita", Jose Greco, and Vicente Romero and Marfa Benitez (both from New Mexico). In addition to other stunning loans from international private collectors will be those from the museum's expansive permanent collection.
4 Native American Beadwork is the summer 2017 exhibition at the Wheelwright Museum of the American Indian that among other things will explore the adaptation of beads made in Venice and elsewhere in Europe to traditional Native North American media, and the expression of non-Native fashion styles through the medium of beadwork.
The New Mexico History Museum will present Agnes Martin and Me, through August 5, 2017. After Georgia O'Keeffe, Martin is New Mexico's best-loved abstractionist painter, whose works have found homes in major museum collections around the world, in london, Berlin, New York, and Paris. This exhibition looks at the personal relationship between Martin and one of her assistants through works of art and photographs.
Markets:
The International Folk Art Market, in its 13th year in 2017, features 800 folk artists from countries around the world, who come to Santa Fe and create a market and an atmosphere that is unique in the entire world.
Spanish Market, which takes place every year on the last weekend on July and which was founded in 1926, features New Mexican practitioners of the art forms bought to New Spain up the Camino Real 1 during the 17th and 18 h centuries, which continue to this day to change the world. These art forms are alive and well in New Mexico and show the influence of Spain on local artists and artisans working with local materials.
Indian Market, which takes place the third weekend in August every year, brings 1,000 of the very best native America artists from around North America, including from Alaska, Hawaii and Canada. The biggest and most well attended of all the markets, Indian Market is the culmination of the summer "market season."
Performance:
Santa Fe's lensic Theater will bring a wide variety of performance in 2017, including Dervish: Magical Music from Ireland, and the Reduced Shakespeare Company's Shakespeare's Long Lost First Play (May 11th). Many other international performances will be added before publication of our brochures (to be finalized)
Performance Santa Fe will as usual bring a wide variety of music, dance and theater events to Santa Fe in 2017, including Shakespeare's Globe Theater Company from london, the Academy of Ancient Music from london and much more (to be confirmed).
Santa Fe Opera attracts the largest number of visitors of any performance or set of events in Santa Fe. In 2017 as usual the program will include major international repertoire by the greatest composers of opera, as well as one new commissioned piece (actual programs to be confirmed by September, 2015)
5 Timellne for Prado In Santa Fe
Week of August 22"d, 2016- Steering Committee Meetings with SCAS (David Setford), City (Randy Randall, Barbara lopez), Chris O'Donald begin to run monthly until April2017
End of August, 2016- Final checklist and images need to be received from Prado
Week of September 1, 2016- Fundraising begins, including applications to Dept of Tourism (deadline end of September) and City of Santa Fe (deadline?)
September, 2016- scouting for producers of panels and stands
1 September 30 h, 2016 -final choice of producer of panels and stands
5 October 31 \ 2016- finalization of partner programs
November, 2016 (check date)- PR, checklist of Prado in Santa Fe exhibit, photos, and description of other programs in Summer of International Art to be sent to national press (check date with Cynthia Delgado)
January/February, 2017- book appropriate local, regional and national ads for April/May onwards (Cynthia Delgado?)
February, 2017- material to go to New Mexican for May insert
April/May 2017- training of "Bienvenidos" volunteers, hotel concierges, etc
Radio and TV interviews (David Setford, Jim Long, Randy Randall, other partners)
1 May 12 h, 13th, 14th 2017-- Exhibit opens
6 PRADO OUTDOOR EXHIBIT Notes Income budget
City of Santa Fe Arts Commission $ 75,000.00
Other Funding coordinated by Jim Long $ 275,000.00
TOTAL INCOME $ 350,000.00
Expense budget (before any in-kind donation of services)
Creation of panels and supports (approx) $ 57,000.00 Number estimated by Prado
Concept, text, design, images, installation supervision $ 45,000.00 Number estimated by Prado
Installation (including deinstallations) $ 10,000.00 estimate
Advertizing & PR $ 150,000.00 $#suggested by Randy Randall
Collateral $ 15,000.00
Opening events, etc $ 10,000.00
Miscellaneous and replacement costs } 8,500.00
Travel/lodging Prado staff, dignitaries, throughout project $ 17,000.00 Number estimated by Prado
Staff for panel moves $ 10,000.00
Grass renewal if required $ 2,500.00
Fee for rental $ 5,000.00
Contingency $ 20,000.00
TOTAL $ 350,000.00
7 8 c. i. or this exhibit that was successful and attracted a large tis a good example of the success and collaboration with the city pop ups was nice.
ll. Exhibit e Exhibit that Rod would like to have Arts mmission members pa · ate as judges. He has sent some dates for participation, please respond t od Lambert.
8) Action Items a) A Resolution Requesting the City Manager to Direct Staff to Determine the Feasibility of an Ati Exhibit of a Curated Exhibit of Reproductions of Some of the Finest Art of the Museo del Prado from Madrid (Mayor Gonzales) (Randy Randall)
Mr. Randall introduced the Resolution instructing staff to plan and put together an exhibit that would be done in conjunction with the Prado in Madrid. The Financial Impact Report (FIR) for this proposed resolution goes further and suggests that the request will require $75,000 from the city both in cash and in-kind services to make this exhibit happen. The exhibit will consist of 100 panels (50 4x8 in size) which are reproductions of some ofthe finest art in the Prado collection and it is curated collection by the Prado. All the Prado does is gives us the license to use the images for the purpose of creating these panels from May thru October, 2017. After that we are not sure what happens to the panels; this is part of what the study will bring forward. This request comes from Mr. Jim Long the Owner of Heritage Hotels who is on the International Board ofDirectors of the Prado and on the Board ofthe Spanish Colonial Arts. This has been done in one or two other locations in South America but never in the United States. Mr. Long would like to have it be done in Santa Fe vs. Albuquerque. The probable location would be in Cathedral Park. Originally they wanted to put it in the Plaza which wasn't conducive for the full term; we could possibly put it at the Railyard. If it was on the plaza it would need to be moved several times and storage would become a concern. Cathedral Park seems like the ideal location and dates can be coordinated with existing bookings for the park. The funding for this exhibit is estimated at approximately $350,000. Mr. Long who is supporting the construction of the exhibit will raise the additional funds ($275,000) outside of the $75,000 that the city would need to contribute. The city's pottion would probably come from the Tourism Santa Fe project from the Convention & Visitors bureau and from the Arts Commission budget but none would disrupt any of the activities of either organization. It may come out of some fund balances in both organizations.
The Chair re-confirmed that Arts Commission would be responsible for partial funding and in recommendation.
Mr. Randall is asking the Arts Commission to recommend that the council approve this study request. If the Arts Commission is opposed to the exhibit I would suggest that it would not make sense to recommend the study. The Fiscal Agent will be the Spanish Colonial Society and Mr. Long is very involved with them. Mr. Randall said that the state museum rejected any support or participating with this. In communicating with Mike Delello from Cultural Affairs we talked about the concept of next year a celebration of global arts and culture of which the Prado exhibition would be a prima feature. He stated that they went with global vs. international because the State Cultural Affairs had a concern that international might not
Arts Commission Minutes, October 24, 2016 Page 3
9 include the Native American progra1mning but global does. The basic value to Santa Fe is it creates additional excitement. We need to continually give our tourist a new reason to return. MEOW WOLF is great example of change and repeat attendance.
Ms. Hunter-Stiebel said that she has a problem calling it an art exhibit. She had heard about it and said she will recuse herself from the vote as she learned of it through the Spanish Colonial Society Program Committee which she Chairs and was not aware that they would be the fiscal agent and that they did not support it. Ms. Hunter-Stiebel said she would state the objections, which were not just hers; i.e., this is not an art exhibition. We did say that as museums and this was when the state museums were still in discussion was that if we got loans of art from the Prado that would be something wonderful and fantastic for a global art and culture celebration. Simply billboards advertising the Prado Art Museum, a number of us did not feel they were a benefit and they would be quite unusual in a museum community because it should be associated with the presence of art from the other institution not just the advertising of another institution.
Mr. Randall stated that he has communicated this to Mr. Long that the exhibit and whether it is called and art exhibit or the Prado exhibit, yet to be determined, that is part of what this study will do. Mr. Randall added clarification and said that the Spanish Colonial Society hasn't become it they created it as the fiscal agent, it was a collaboration between David representing Spanish Colonial and Mr. Long who came to Mr. Randall and said they would like the city to get behind it and support it.
Mr. Randall said that this is not marketing for the Prado. Ms. Garcia y Griego has pictures of the images that are proposed. It has been communicated that it would be nicer to have art pieces come over but there is no chance of that. There is the possibility that the Royal Family would come to Santa Fe to see this exhibit. The question of execution and staff time should be studied. Mr. Randall said that this is not being done for the sake of art; it is being done for the sake of marketing Santa Fe and having an exhibit here. It is not art onto itself it is an experience.
Mr. Vallo noted that he is struggling with the concept of "it is not art" but it is an exhibit. He is not a fan of those types of poster or banners and more so in an outdoor environment as there is so much distraction. Mr. Vallo suggested a more creative way to showcase it throughout the city. Mr. Randall said that the Prado said no, they want it to be in one location and all together. Mr. Vallo said that is too bad he felt that curation could be successful if spread out.
Ms. Perry asked if there is any feedback from the two other shows in Latin America as to the success ofthis exhibit. Mr. Randall said it supposedly drew hundreds ofthousands of people and he would provide the Arts Commission members with oome information.
Mr. Lovato asked if the Cathedral has any feedback. Mr. Randall said the city runs the park and they don't anticipate any problems. There are 6 images that are questionable and if they created a problem they would be removed from the package.
Ms. 01tiz-Pena asked if it isn't Art than why it is coming to the Arts Commission. It needs to be defined clearly.
Arts Commission Minutes, October 24, 2016 Page4
10 Mr. Randall suggested striking the word "Art" and referred to it as a curated exhibit of reproductions of some of the finest art, but it would not be an art exhibit. It would be a curated exhibit of the finest art.
Ms. Garcia y Griego has been a part of initial meetings with Mr. Long and she feels that what we have historically funded, our mission surpasses our funding source. Ms. Garcia y Griego does have concerns of it being reproductions, concerns of representing it as Santa Fe's finest art. She also understands Randy's perspective that it will have marketing value, it has to be part of a larger effort and she would like Santa Fe vs. Albuquerque to have it. Ms. Garcia y Griego said that it is also important to recognize that with the State Museums stepping out and coming back in, this is an important stand of support for them to take. The $75,000 is not the cost of the study it is to support the exhibit.
The Chair said we would be spending seed money to push a concept to see how it works. What is interesting about this is that it is a public/private collaboration which we don't have a lot of. This could also enhance our relationship with sister cities.
Mr. Randall reiterated that he would like to see striking the word "Art Exhibit of' from the title leaving it as a curated exhibit of reproductions. Ms. Garcia y Griego further clarified that it should say; feasibility on an exhibit of reproductions. Take out curated as it has a certain connotation, the Prado is the Curator.
Ms. Perry moved to support tlte study as amended; no second to tlte motion, motion dies for lack of a second.
11 ACTION SHEET ITEM FROM FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING OF 10/31/16 FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF 11/09/16
ISSUE:
12. Request for Approval of a Resolution Requesting the City Manager to Direct Staff to Determine the Feasibility of an Art Exhibit of a Curated Exhibit of Reproductions of some of the Finest Art of the Museo Del Prado from Madrid. (Mayor Gonzales and Councilor lves) (Randy Randall)
Committee Review: Arts Commission (no recommendations) 10/24/16 City Council (scheduled) 11/09/16
Fiscal Impact- No
FINANCE COMMITTEE ACTION:
Approved as discussion item.
FUNDING SOURCE: 21718.49061
SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR AMENDMENTS
Approved with amendment.
STAFF FOLLOW-UP:
Approved with direction to staff.
VOTE FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN COUNCILOR VILLARREAL X COUNCILOR IVES X COUNCILOR LINDELL X COUNCILOR HARRIS X CHAIRPERSON DOMINGUEZ
4-13-15
12 City of Santa Fe, New Mexico LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY Resolution No. 2016- Prado Curated Exhibit
SPONSOR(S): Mayor Gonzales and Councilor Ives
SUMMARY: The proposed resolution requests the City Manager to direct staff to determine the feasibility of an art exhibit of a curated exhibit of reproductions of some of the finest art of the Museo del Prado from Madrid.
PREP ARKD BY: Rebecca Seligman, Legislative Liaison Assistant
FISCAL IMPACT: Yes
DATE: October 14, 2016
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution FIR
13 1 CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO
2 RESOLUTION 2016-
3 INTRODUCED BY:
4
5 Mayor Javier M. Gonzales
6 Councilor Peter fves
7
8
9
10 A RESOLUTION
11 REQUESTING THE CITY MANAGER TO DIRECT STAFF TO DETERMINE THE
12 FEASIBIL1TY OF AN ART l!:XHIBIT OF A CURATED EXHIBIT OF REPRODUCTIONS
13 OF SOME OF THE FINEST ART OF THE MUSEO DEL PRADO FROM MADRID.
14
15 WHEREAS, the Prado Museum in central Madrid is an internationally acclaimed museum
16 housing the world's finest collections of European art; and
17 WHEREAS, the Prado unquestionably houses the best single collection of Spanish art Spain dating
18 from the 12th century to the early 20th century, based on the former Spanish Royal Collection; and
19 WHEREAS, Santa Fe is an internationally known center for the arts; and
20 WHEREAS, New Mexico has a long standing relationship with Spain, including
21 native son, Ambassador Edward L. Romero who served as Ambassador to Spain from 1998 to 200 l;
22 Iand 23 WHEREAS, .lim Long, the founder of Heritage Hotels, a New Mexico based hotel company
24 with four hotels in Santa Fe, has served on the international board of directors of the Prado as well as
25 the board of Directors for the Spanish Colonial Arts Society; and
1
14 1 WHEREAS, !he Prado hns 11 desire to offer Ranta Fe the opportunity for a curiltecl exhibit of
2 reproductions of some of the finest are of the Prado.
3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE
4 CITY OF SANTA FE that the City Manager directs staff to determine the feasibility of the art
s Iexhibit in Santa Fe from May through October, 2017.
6 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE]) that staff takes the following into considerlltioll in the
7 determining the scope of the project:
8 I. Location of exhibit
9 2. Cost of project;
10 3. Funding source; and
11 4. Execution plan.
12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff shall report their f1ndings to the Governing Body
13 sixty (60) days from the passage of this resolution.
14 PASSED APPROVED and ADOPTED this ____ day of _____. __, 2016.
15
16
17 JAVIER M. GONZALES, MAYOR
18 ATTEST:
19
20
21 YOLANDA Y. VIGIL, CITY CLERK
22 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
23 1;1··~/1 ;f ftt fl J 1 I 1 /J 24 1UltJ4f __r~~;2JLC/{!_~:J/J_-f2-/L-
25 KELLEY AI. BRENNAN, CTTY ATTORNEY M!Le~islotion!Resolutions 2016/Pmdo Curoted Exhibit I
2
15 FIR No. '2. This Fiscal Impact Report (FIR) shall be completed for each proposed bill or resolution as to its direct impact upon the City's operating budget and is intended for use by any of the standing committees of and the Governing Rody of the City ofS;mta Fe. Bills or resolutions with no fiscal impact still require a completed FIR. Bills or resolutions with a fist.:al impact must be reviewed by the Finance Committee. Bills or resolutions without a fiscal impact generally do not require review by the Finance Committee unless the subject of the bill or resolution is financial in nature. Section A. Generallnfonnation (Check) Bill: ______Resolution: __,_,_ __ (A single FIR may be used for related bills and/or resolutions) Short Title(s): A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY MANAGER TO DIRECT STAFF TO DETERMINE HIE FEASIBILITY OF AN ART EXHIBIT OF A CliRATED EXIUDIT OF REPRODUCTIONS OF SOME OF THE FINEST ART OF THE MUSEO DEL PRADO FROM MADlUD. Reviewing Department{s): Persons Completing FIR: Reviewed by City Attorney: -~,L{,A,"-"'-'-'-f-~----'.;u:_,-..::...... c.,.,...,_..=..... ____D"o JP~ rf ~ ---- Reviewed by Finance Director: -/;~~::::=-..._..:.:.._..:__:..:::.;c_:::::.______.u /0 ·t/3 Jfa ____ _ (Signature) =====~======~~======:===~======~======Section B. Summary Briefly explain the purpose and major provisions of the bill/resolution: The Resolution r·eguests the City Manager to direct staff to determine the feasibility of an art exhibit of a curatcd exhibit of reproductions of some of the finest art of the Museo del Prado from Madrid, Spain. ~====-:::======::::::======:-;:::;:.=:=:!======';::::======~======Section C. Fiscal Impact Note: Financial information on this FIR does not directly translate into a City of Santa Fe budget increase. For a budget increase, the following ore required: a. The item must be on the agenda at the Finance Committee and City Council as a "Request for Approval of a City of Santa Fe Budget Increase" with a definitive funding sout·ce (could be same item and same time as bi lllresolution) b. Detailed budget infonnation must be attached as to fund, business units, and line item, amounts, and explanations (similar to annual requests for budget) c. Detailed personnel forms must be attached as to range, salary, and benefit allocation and signed by Human Resource Department for each new position(s) requested (prorated for period to be employed by fiscal year)* 1. Projected Expenditures: a. Indicate Fiscal Year(s) atTected- usuaily current fiscal year and following fiscal year (i.e., FY 03/04 and FY (J4/05) b. Indicate: "A" if current budget and level of staffing will absorb the costs ")'..;" if new, additional, or increased budget or stafllng will be required G. Indicate: "R" ···if recurring annual costs "NR" if one-time, non .. recurring costs, such as start-up, contract or equipment costs d. Atlach additional projection schedules iftwo years does not adequately project revenue and cost patterns c. Costs may be netted or shown as an offset if some eosl savings are projected (explain in Section ] Narrative) 16 Check here if no fiscal impact Co Iu 11111 it;_:·-----'--·- ---,.. -:::-:-::--2:-::-::-:::·-r·:~-:-::3:-::::-_-c---r-:::;:-::--:;:_----·-r;::;-;-·------,·-;;-:-;;--·::::-"7"--·---r7;~~1~~~:::t-~;..l::·:..~· s-:ntg·s· . .. .., .. ~~t~~!~~:-- .., or"NR" Non- I J -'------'----·-·------" recurrit~..l______ Personnel* Fringe** Capital Outlay Land/ Building Professional __ NR_ Services All Other _$ ___ Operating Costs Total: * Any indication that additional staffing would be required must be reviewed and approved in advance by the City Manager by attached memo before release of Ff.R to committees. **For thnge benefits contact the Finance Dept. 2. Revenue Sources: a. To indicate new revenues and/or b. Required for costs for which new expenditure budget is proposed above in item l. Column II: J 2 3 4 5 6 ~- ~::~:e· ······JF'r·-----· , ~~~--~-~,-~--l~~lt~I'Y---=====--·- .,ccR=-R~-,,C--l~,::::,~-i~-t~-0--,-_.--: ..~::-,~--~-:c,::.t_e_d __ ..., 1 or "NR" "NR" Non- ______l;~:~~ri~______...J_'_·e_c __u_J,._in_g __ , ______, Total: 2 17 ------·············· .... ···----···-·------·------·------·--- 3. Expenditure/Revenue Narrative: Explain revenue source(s). Include revenue c8lculations, grant(s) available, anticipated date of receipt of revenues/grants, clc. Explain expenditures, grant match(.>), justify personnel increase(s), detail capital and operating uses, etc. (Attach supplemental page, if necessary.) Expenditure for the Prado exhibit will come from existing Arts Commission and Visit Santa Fe (CVB) budget funds to the extent possible and/or from fund balances for those two entities. There is also some in kind services that can provide a portion of the funds. The study required in the resolution will identify the exact nature of the funding recommendation. Interest in the exhibit will generate lodger's tax and GRT for the city. At a minimum level of 5,000 visits, close to $200,000 of lodger's and GRT will be generated. ======~===~======~======~======~ Section D. Genera I Narrative 1. Conflicts: Does this proposed bill/resolution duplicate/conflict with/companion to/relate to any City code, approved ordinance or resolution, other adopted policies or proposed legislation? Include details of city adopted laws/ordinance/resolutions and dates. Summarize the relationships, conflicts or overlaps. None identified. 2. Consequences of Not Enacting This Bill/Resolution: Arc there consequences of not enacting this bill/resolution? If so, describe. Lost opportunity as exhibit might go to Albuquerque as an alternative. While Santa Fe is a far more attractive tourism destination, we arc always looking for something new and different to market - particularly in the regional markets where repeat business to Santa Fe is very high. 3. Technical Issues: Are there incorrect citations of law, drafting eiTors or other problems? Are there any amendments that .should be considered? Are there any other alternatives which should be considered? If so, describe. None identified. 4. Community Impact: Briefly describe the major positive or negative effects the Bill/Resolution might have on the community including, but not limited to, businesses, neighborhoods, families, children and youth, social service providers and other institutions such as schools, churches, etc. Definite positive impact on tourism as it will be a significant regional draw. The total cost of the pt·ojcct is expected to be in the range of $350,000. Jim Long has committed to find the total funding to produce the project. The $75,000 in cash and in kind services from the City is a part of the project funding. 18