DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Merced UC Merced Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Merced UC Merced Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC Merced UC Merced Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Approaches To Integrating A HIgh Penertration Of Solar PV and CPV Onto The Electrical Grid Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6vq9z0mk Author Hill, Steven Craig Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, MERCED This is the Title of My Dissertation A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy In Approaches To Integrating A High Penetration Of Solar PV and CPV Onto The Electrical Grid By Steven Craig Hill Committee in charge: Assistant Professor Elliott Campbell, Chair Assistant Professor Yanbao Ma Associate Professor Jay Sharping Professor Roland Winston 2013 i ii The Dissertation of Steven Craig Hill is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: University of California, Merced 2013 Acknowledgement First I would thank my parents Lloyd and Beverly Hill. My mother was a perfect homemaker who always gave kind words of encouragement and always could see the good and potential in us. Dad was a great engineering leader for the United States Steel Corporation who transferred his practical engineering skills to helping neighbors with their landscaping, sprinkling systems, building projects and even animal control problems. Dad has always been the best neighbor I have ever known. Next I would like to thank my wife Lynn, the light of my life, and son Michael for their sacrifice in putting up with my absence the past six years. I appreciate their loyalty, patience and desire for me to finish the task. I express my love to the rest of the children Andy, Jenny, Rob and Craig and their wonderful spouses Cami, Mark, Amanda and Leanne. They have given me fourteen wonderful grandchildren: Drew, Brady, Addison, McKenna, Samantha, Abigail, Lidia, Molly, Charlotte, Jane, Max, McKenzie, Thomas and Evrett. I hope my effort will motivate them to seek a good education and serve the world well with their learning. I would like to especially acknowledge and thank Professor Roland Winston, my advisor and mentor. Without him I would have never begun or continued this adventure of the past six years. He inspires me to keep thinking. I express my appreciation to Professor Elliott Campbell, Professor Yanbao Ma, and Professor Jay Sharping for their time in serving on my Committee. Their comments have been very constructive and helpful in focusing my efforts. I also express thanks to Professor Gavilan, Shannon Adamson and Carrie King who have helped me acquire teaching assignments as well as Professor Tom Harmon, Lei Yue and Bob Rice for allowing me to help them teach. I also appreciate the Research Team from UC Merced consisting of” Paul Thompson, Hatem Elgaili, Guadalupe Martinez Chavez, Neekole Acorda, Brian Weikel, Luis Perez,Elizabeth Rivera, and Erika Marie Generoso for all their help in contacting staff of the Waste Water Treatment plant in California. I would like to thank past working colleagues Joel Yoder and Walt Swain from Westinghouse and Northrup Grumman, Roger Vanhoy and Greg Salyer from Modesto Irrigation District, Larry Gilbertson from Turlock Irrigation District , Jim Pope, Hari Modi, Ron Yuen, Tom Lee and Scott Tomashefsky from Northern California Power Agency and John Carrier from CH2MHill for their comments, encouragement and support. I express my thanks to Dr. Peter Reischl at San Jose State University who encouraged me to pursue this course twenty years ago and Kaye Larsen, my Provo High School math teacher, who took an interest and motivated me forty five years ago. iv Abstract The United States has ample potential renewable energy resources, especially in wind and solar having a combined 15,000 Gigawatts of potential capacity [1,2]. For the past 30 years, California has led the nation in promoting and using energy efficiency programs and has led the nation with the most aggressive Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) goals. Energy efficiency and demand response programs are key strategies for addressing climate change and meeting AB 32 (California ‘s 33% RPS law ). RPS goals have been adopted by 43 states that require on average 20% of energy delivered to customers by 2020 by from renewable resources [140]. Solar cost reductions, increasing cost of traditional resources, and Renewable Portfolio Standards have created the possibility of significant levels of distributed solar generation being installed on the grid and specifically, the distribution system [127]. Federal law requires grid modernization to enable an increased dependency on variable and distributed energy resources [143]. This means that existing market and grid control systems, based on traditional centralized resources and one-way distributed power flows, require new operational paradigms, systems architectures and market structures. California’s utility rate design and the NEM program for rooftop solar will also require future changes. Land use challenges, both local and remote, may lead to new applications of installing solar PV on water. Studies performed by the California Transmission Planning Group (CTPG) have shown the proposed “high potential” transmission upgrades may be insufficient, by themselves, to allow California to meet its 33% RPS goal. Because integrating a high penetration of distributed resources on to the distribution network is evolving with its own unique challenges, a floating water-borne solar PV design is discussed to assist in bridging the gap to assist in meeting RPS goals, energy efficiency goals and the Governor’s goal to achieve 12,000MW of distributed generation in California. The floating water-borne PV system is capable of installation on waste water treatment plant (WWT) settling ponds. California has more than 800 WWT plants and estimates predict floating water-borne PV on WWT ponds could potentially generate greater than 1000 MW without the need to build additional transmission. v Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Challenges and Opportunities for Integrating Solar PV into Resource Portfolios to meet California’s RPS goals ............................................................. 6 2.1 Regulation and POlicy Challenges for solar PV .......................................................... 6 2.1.1 Utility Rate Design and NEM .................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Exclusion of Rooftop Solar PV from RPS Eligibility ................................................... 9 2.1.3 Distribution Reliability Problems ........................................................................... 10 2.2 High PV Penetration on Utility Distribution Systems ............................................... 12 2.2.1 Limitations Due To Clouds ..................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Voltage Regulation ................................................................................................. 15 2.3 The Land Challenge for Solar ................................................................................... 15 2.4 A LOCAL PV DEVELOPMENT OPTION‐ A BRIDGE TO THE FUTURE ............................. 20 2.5 Specification for a Water‐borne System .................................................................. 22 2.5.1 Design for Life Cycle Cost ....................................................................................... 23 2.5.2 Structure ................................................................................................................ 23 2.5.3 Cabling .................................................................................................................... 24 2.5.4 Tracking .................................................................................................................. 24 2.5.5 Reliability and warranty ......................................................................................... 24 2.5.6 Electrical, Controls & Protection ............................................................................ 25 2.5.7 Maintainability ....................................................................................................... 26 2.5.8 Performance Tests ................................................................................................. 26 2.5.9 OTHER .................................................................................................................... 26 3.0 Floating Water-Borne PV application Consideration for Utility Application in California ............................................................................................................ 28 3.1 Waste Water Treatment Plants ............................................................................... 28 3.1.1 Activated Sludge .................................................................................................... 28 3.1.2 Fixed‐Growth Biological Systems ........................................................................... 29 3.1.3 Oxidation Ponds ..................................................................................................... 29 3.2 Floating Water‐Borne CPV System .......................................................................... 30 3.3 ALGAE IN WASTE WATER TREATMENT ...................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E
    California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Karl E. Longley, ScD, P.E., Chair Linda S. Adams Arnold 11020 Sun Center Drive #200, Rancho Cordova, California 95670-6114 Secretary for Phone (916) 464-3291 • FAX (916) 464-4645 Schwarzenegger Environmental http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley Governor Protection 18 August 2008 See attached distribution list DELTA REGIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM STAKEHOLDER PANEL KICKOFF MEETING This is an invitation to participate as a stakeholder in the development and implementation of a critical and important project, the Delta Regional Monitoring Program (Delta RMP), being developed jointly by the State and Regional Boards’ Bay-Delta Team. The Delta RMP stakeholder panel kickoff meeting is scheduled for 30 September 2008 and we respectfully request your attendance at the meeting. The meeting will consist of two sessions (see attached draft agenda). During the first session, Water Board staff will provide an overview of the impetus for the Delta RMP and initial planning efforts. The purpose of the first session is to gain management-level stakeholder input and, if possible, endorsement of and commitment to the Delta RMP planning effort. We request that you and your designee attend the first session together. The second session will be a working meeting for the designees to discuss the details of how to proceed with the planning process. A brief discussion of the purpose and background of the project is provided below. In December 2007 and January 2008 the State Water Board, Central Valley Regional Water Board, and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board (collectively Water Boards) adopted a joint resolution (2007-0079, R5-2007-0161, and R2-2008-0009, respectively) committing the Water Boards to take several actions to protect beneficial uses in the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary (Bay-Delta).
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Ehrhorn Collection of Stone Boat Yard Photographs, Circa 1885-2005
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8p84b6t No online items A guide to the Jack Ehrhorn collection of Stone Boat Yard photographs, circa 1885-2005 Processed by: Amy Croft. San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone: 415-561-7030 Fax: 415-556-3540 [email protected] URL: http://www.nps.gov/safr 2013 A guide to the Jack Ehrhorn P05-081 (SAFR 23147) 1 collection of Stone Boat Yard photographs, circa 1885-2005 A Guide to the Jack Ehrhorn collection of Stone Boat Yard photographs P05-081 San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, National Park Service 2013, National Park Service Title: Jack Ehrhorn collection of Stone Boat Yard photographs Date: circa 1885-2005 Date (bulk): 1920-1975 Collection No. (Catalog No.): P05-081 (SAFR 23147) Collector: Ehrhorn, Jack Physical Description: 15.30 linear ft. Repository: San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, Historic Documents Department Building E, Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Abstract: The Jack Ehrhorn collection of Stone Boat Yard photographs, circa 1885-2005, bulk 1920-1975, (SAFR 23147, P05-081) is comprised mainly of photographs of yachts under construction at the Stone Boat Yard and underway in the San Francisco Bay area during the 1920s-1970s. The collection has been processed to the item level and is open for use. Physical Location: San Francisco Maritime NHP, Historic Documents Department Language(s): In English. Access This collection is open for use unless otherwise noted. Publication and Use Rights Some material may be copyrighted or restricted. It is the researcher's obligation to determine and satisfy copyright or other case restrictions when publishing or otherwise distributing materials found in the collections.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Legacies of Delta History
    2. TheLegaciesofDeltaHistory “You could not step twice into the same river; for other waters are ever flowing on to you.” Heraclitus (540 BC–480 BC) The modern history of the Delta reveals profound geologic and social changes that began with European settlement in the mid-19th century. After 1800, the Delta evolved from a fishing, hunting, and foraging site for Native Americans (primarily Miwok and Wintun tribes), to a transportation network for explorers and settlers, to a major agrarian resource for California, and finally to the hub of the water supply system for San Joaquin Valley agriculture and Southern California cities. Central to these transformations was the conversion of vast areas of tidal wetlands into islands of farmland surrounded by levees. Much like the history of the Florida Everglades (Grunwald, 2006), each transformation was made without the benefit of knowing future needs and uses; collectively these changes have brought the Delta to its current state. Pre-European Delta: Fluctuating Salinity and Lands As originally found by European explorers, nearly 60 percent of the Delta was submerged by daily tides, and spring tides could submerge it entirely.1 Large areas were also subject to seasonal river flooding. Although most of the Delta was a tidal wetland, the water within the interior remained primarily fresh. However, early explorers reported evidence of saltwater intrusion during the summer months in some years (Jackson and Paterson, 1977). Dominant vegetation included tules—marsh plants that live in fresh and brackish water. On higher ground, including the numerous natural levees formed by silt deposits, plant life consisted of coarse grasses; willows; blackberry and wild rose thickets; and galleries of oak, sycamore, alder, walnut, and cottonwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Franks Tract and Little Franks Tract User Survey
    Franks Tract and Little Franks Tract User Survey Brett Milligan, Professor of Landscape Architecture, UC Davis Alejo Kraus-Polk, Ph.D. candidate in Geography, UC Davis Standardized invitation to participate in the survey………………………………………………………………..…2 User survey……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 User survey responses summarized by question…………………………………………………………………….…5 Standardized invitation to participate in the survey: We would appreciate your participation in a quick (5 -10 minute) survey intended for people who live, work, and play in and around Franks Tract and Little Franks Tract. Completion of this survey will provide the opportunity to have your values and preferences documented and included in a forthcoming Franks Tract restoration feasibility study. Franks Tract & Little Franks Tract User Survey Survey responses will be collected on a password protected google spreadsheet, accessible exclusively to project researchers (Brett Milligan, Alejo Kraus-Polk). Survey responses will remain anonymous (individual identifying information will not be gathered). Participation is voluntary. Thank you for your participation, 2 | Franks Tract and Little Franks Tract User Survey Franks Tract & Little Franks Tract User Survey This anonymous survey is intended to assess current resident and user values for Franks Tract & Little Franks Tract. Survey results will be included in a forthcoming Franks Tract restoration feasibility study. Participation is voluntary. Which use category do you identify with most? Please check only one.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase II Sediment Study Grays Harbor and Willapa Bay July 19, 2019 – Grays Harbor Conservation District
    Phase II Sediment Study Grays Harbor and Willapa Bay July 19, 2019 – Grays Harbor Conservation District Mott MacDonald | Phase II, Grays Harbor and Willapa Bay Sedimentation Dynamics and Mitigation Measures Project Contents 1 Qualifications and Relevant Experience 1 2 Description of Project Experience 5 3 Methodology and Background 8 4 Schedule 10 Mott MacDonald | Phase II, Grays Harbor and Willapa Bay Sedimentation Dynamics and Mitigation Measures Project 1 1 Qualifications and Relevant Experience Mott MacDonald, LLC (Mott MacDonald) combines coastal, estuarine, water resources, and ports expertise to deliver high quality coastal processes analysis and innovative designs that meet the client’s goals and objectives. Our Coastal and Ports practice (formerly called Coast & Harbor Engineering) provides specialty engineering services in numerical modeling, coastal processes assessments, sediment transport and pathways analysis, and design of various shoreline erosion protection, restoration, and planning projects located on open coasts and in estuaries, lakes, and rivers. Mott MacDonald engineers perform feasibility studies, numerical modeling of coastal, geomorphologic, littoral, and hydrodynamic processes, and all phases of engineering design, planning, permitting assistance, and construction management for coastal Innovative Modeling: 3D Wave Modeling of improvements and ecosystem restoration actions. Living Shoreline Oyster Reef Coastal/Estuarine Processes Analysis & Design Evaluation, assessment, and design of estuarine habitats including shellfish beds, eelgrass, forage fish, and juvenile salmon is a core competency of our coastal practice. Our engineers specialize in analyzing physical processes and their effects in the coastal and estuarine zone areas. By analyzing and simulating waves, currents, winds, sediment transport, and morphologic processes, we assess the project’s feasibility for planning, permitting, and design.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 2016 Orinda News.Indd
    THE ORINDA NEWS Gratis Published by The Orinda Association 12 Issues Annually Volume 31, Number 1 Delivered to 9,000 Households and Businesses in Orinda January 2016 Local Mom, Philanthropic Organization Win Orinda’s Top Honors for 2015 SALLY HOGARTY SALLY HOGARTY Anna Tague has been selected as the OA's 2015 The Orinda Community Foundation is this year's William Penn Mott, Jr. Environmental Award recipient. (L-R) OCF board members Ted Urban, Mark Roberts, Volunteer of the Year. Dick Burkhalter, Sue Severson, Richard Westin and Richard Stanaro. Not shown is board member Carol Penskar. By SALLY HOGARTY deliberating over their choices. But, when the Year. “There are so many wonderful in reality, she volunteers for many things,” Editor all was said and done, Anna Tague emerged people in our community that do so much,” says Sandy Kassis. “If she sees a need in as the Volunteer of the Year and the Orinda she says. “Can I decline the award so you the community, she doesn’t just talk about ach year the Orinda Association (OA) Community Foundation was selected for can give it to someone truly deserving?” it, she personally looks for ways to meet Ehas the difficult task of selecting the the William Penn Mott, Jr. Environmental However, given the many recommenda- the need.” Volunteer of the Year and the William Penn Award. tions that flowed into the OA office on her From working with the Orinda Juniors Mott, Jr. Environmental Award recipients behalf and her impressive 19 years of vol- to the Community Center Auxiliary to from a myriad of local residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicx Division
    San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board NOTICE OF APPLICABILITY WATER QUALITY ORDER 2016-0068-DDW GENERAL WATER RECLAMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLED WATER USE This Notice of Applicability (Notice) transfers recycled water permit coverage for the applicants listed in Notice Attachment 1 (Region 2 Administrators) from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board’s (Regional Water Board’s) General Water Reuse Requirements for Municipal Wastewater and Water Agencies, Order No. R2-1996-0011 (Regional General Order), to the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board’s) General Water Reclamation Requirements for Recycled Water Use, Order WQ 2016-0068-DDW (State General Order). This Notice also specifies conditions the Region 2 Administrators must meet in order to maintain such coverage. The State General Order delegates most responsibility for administering water recycling programs to the applicants as “Administrators.” Administrators include producers, distributors, and users of recycled water, and legal entities such as a joint powers agreement or equivalent contractual agreement between a producer, distributor, irrigation entity, or other entity. Based upon each Region 2 Administrator’s Notice of Intent, Title 22 Engineering Report, and recycled water annual reports submitted to the Regional Water Board under the Regional General Order, the Regional Water Board’s Executive Officer hereby finds that the State General Order is applicable to the Region 2 Administrators and that the Region 2 Administrators are enrolled under and regulated by the State General Order, as of the date of this Notice. The State General Order is attached (Notice Attachment 3) and is accessible online at: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopted_orders/water_quality/2016/w qo2016_0068_ddw.pdf The Region 2 Administrators are responsible for administering their respective recycled water programs in accordance with the State General Order, including the requirements of California Code of Regulations Title 22 (22 CCR), division 4, chapter 3.
    [Show full text]