<<

Life History and Courtship Behavior of Black Perch, jacksoni (Teleostomi: Embiotocidae), from Southern California1

Bridgette Froeschke,2 Larry G. Allen,2,4 and Daniel J. Pondella II3

Abstract: The black perch, Agassiz, 1853, is a common reef fish associated with nearshore marine habitats of California, with the majority of the population occurring within the Southern California Bight. Black perch were collected throughout southern California from Santa Barbara to Carlsbad, including Santa Catalina Island, to determine their physical characteristics, growth, sex ratio, periodicity of reproduction, and length of gestation. Court- ship observations were conducted using scuba along the King Harbor Break- water in Redondo Beach, California, from January 2004 to December 2005 to verify periodicity of courting and associated reproductive behaviors. Specimens captured ranged from 75 to 220 mm standard length and from 18 to 487 g in total body weight. Seven age-classes were determined by otolith aging, with the growth rate tapering off after age-class one. Seventy percent of the individ- uals captured were from age-classes one to three. Growth rates did not differ between sexes. Mean monthly gonosomatic indexes for males peaked from July to November, with the highest mean occurring in October. Gestating females were found from December to May, with youngest gestating females being in age-class one. Courtship behaviors were observed within aggregations and in pairs from July to November, with males being the primary aggressors. Court- ship postures occurred along the base of the reef, with pairs departing into caves for copulation. This study suggests that the black perch population within the Southern California Bight has different life history characteristics and reproduc- tive timing than those in northern California.

Surfperches (Embiotocidae) are an eco- (cold affinity [Holbrook et al. 1997, logically important family of viviparous tele- Horn et al. 2006]). They are found in a vari- ost fishes that occur along the eastern Pacific ety of habitats, including sandy and rocky coast in California, Oregon, and Washington reefs, intertidal and subtidal kelp beds, bays (DeMartini 1969). Nineteen of 23 species of and estuaries, and eelgrass beds (Leet et al. occur along the California coast 2001, Allen and Pondella 2006, Allen et al. (Anderson and Bryan 1970, Leet et al. 2001) 2006, Stephens et al. 2006). However, surf- and are considered northern, temperate perch abundance has declined by up to 80% in California, probably as a result of increased ocean temperature (Holbrook et al. 1997) and 1 Financial support was provided by the Long Beach commercial and recreational fishing (Karpov Aquarium of the Pacific, Sigma Xi, Vantuna Research et al. 1995). Group, and the Nearshore Marine Research Pro- One of the most abundant surfperches off gram. Manuscript accepted 12 December 2006. California is the black perch (Embiotoca jack- 2 Department of Biology, California State University Northridge, Northridge, California 91330-8303. soni Agassiz, 1853), which ranges from Fort 3 Department of Biology, Occidental College, Los Bragg in northern California to central Baja Angeles, California 90042. California in Mexico (Miller and Lea 1972). 4 Corresponding author: [email protected]. Reports on the life history and reproductive behaviors of black perch have been sporadic Pacific Science (2007), vol. 61, no. 4:521–531 (Carlisle et al. 1964, Isaacson and Isaacson : 2007 by University of Hawai‘i Press 1966, Behrens 1977, Hixon 1981, Baltz All rights reserved 1984). Moreover, conflicting information on

521 522 PACIFIC SCIENCE . October 2007 maturation, timing of reproduction, and re- weighed to the nearest gram when specimens productive behavior of black perch has ap- were worked up in the field or weighed to peared in the literature (Carlisle et al. 1964, the nearest 0.001 g when brought to the Isaacson and Isaacson 1966, Behrens 1977, laboratory. Hixon 1981, Baltz 1984). Sex of each fish was determined using Age and growth parameters were deter- external characteristics (presence or absence mined using the scale method for shiner of gonopodium) and state of gonads. For perch, walleye , and white seaperch females, it was noted if the individual was (Anderson and Bryan 1970). They reported gravid, and if so the number of embryos was that all three species grew fastest in length in recorded. The gonosomatic index (GSI) was their first year, with growth tapering off in calculated for males using the following equa- later years. In addition, white seaperch had tion: GSI ¼ (gonad weight/gonad-free body the fastest growth at any age and weight) 100 (Wiebe 1968b). had the slowest. Females grew faster than males and thus were longer than males in all Age and Growth three species, with the difference being ap- parent in 1-yr-old shiner perch but not until The sagittal otoliths were removed through the second year of life for walleye surfperch the ventrum of the neurocranium (Craig and white seaperch. It was speculated that et al. 1999). Length to the nearest 0.1 mm, sexual dimorphism in size developed earlier width to the nearest 0.1 mm, and weight to in shiner perch than in the other two species the nearest 0.0001 g were determined for the because shiner perch matured earlier (Ander- left sagittal otolith for each fish. If the left son and Bryan 1970). They also reported that otolith was broken or missing the right oto- males had a shorter life span in shiner perch lith was used. Otoliths were then mounted and walleye surfperch, whereas white sea- onto wood blocks with cyanoacrylate (super- perch had the same life span in both sexes. glue), and a 0.5-mm cross section was cut The purpose of the study reported here through the focus using a low-speed saw was to obtain data on various life history (Buehler Isomet). Each cross section was parameters and courtship behavior for black placed in a watch glass with a black back- perch (E. jacksoni) throughout the Southern ground, filled with distilled water, and read California Bight. Specifically, in this report using a dissecting microscope at 50 and/or we summarize information on length fre- 25 magnification under reflected light. An- quency, length-weight relationship, age and nual rings were counted (an opaque band and growth parameters, reproductive state, and a translucent band), and the outer edge was behaviors of black perch in the Southern Cal- noted as being translucent (clear) or opaque ifornia Bight. (white). Each otolith was read independently twice, and when a discrepancy existed be- tween the two readings a third blind reading materials and methods was performed. Only three otoliths were ex- cluded due to discrepancies among the three Collection of Specimens readings. FISHPARM (1989) was used to Black perch were collected monthly by spear, construct the growth curve for black perch by gill nets in conjunction with Ocean overall and for males and females separately Resources Enhancement and Hatchery Pro- using the von Bertalanffy growth equation: gram (OREHP) sampling for juvenile white Kðtt0 Þ seabass, and from impingement studies of Lt ¼ Lyð1 e Þ coastal generating stations in Redondo Beach and Carlsbad, California ( Table 1). The fol- where Lt ¼ predicted length at age t, lowing life history metrics were collected Ly ¼ maximum predicted length by equa- for each fish: standard length (SL) (mm), total tion, e ¼ base of the natural log, K ¼ growth length (mm), total body mass (g), and gonad rate constant, t ¼ age, t0 ¼ theoretical length weight (g). Body mass and gonads were at time zero. Life History and Courtship of Black Perch . Froeschke et al. 523

To obtain fish from all age classes, age was aggressive, and feeding behaviors. In addi- determined for all individuals smaller than tion, divers noted any patterns related to 100 mm SL and larger than 190 mm SL. body size, grouping fish into three size classes In addition, because of the large numbers of (<100 mm SL [juveniles], >100 mm SL to black perch collected ranging from 150 to <150 mm SL [subadults], and >150 mm SL 160 mm SL, for months (May, August, Octo- [adults] [Ebeling and Laur 1985]). ber, November) in which a high number of Black perch were observed at various times fish were collected, age was determined for of day at the Long Beach Aquarium of the 20 randomly chosen individuals. The weight- Pacific weekly from June 2004 to January length relationship was calculated using the 2005 to better understand their behavioral equation W ¼ aLb, where W ¼ weight (g), postures, agonistic behaviors, and courtship L ¼ standard length (mm). Constants (a and behaviors before and during observations b) were determined using nonlinear regres- that were conducted in the field. sion in STATISTICA 7 (StatSoft 2007). Statistical Analyses Behavior The null hypotheses that the weight and Scuba observations in the field were con- length relationship and the growth rates ducted in King Harbor, Redondo Beach, did not differ between sexes were tested along the west breakwater. Observations using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) were conducted monthly until courting be- in SYSTAT 9 (SYSTAT Software 1999). havior was first observed; then observations Data were log10ðx þ 1Þ transformed to meet were conducted weekly. Behavioral obser- assumptions of linearity. In addition, the null vations were made from January 2004 to hypothesis that there was no relationship be- December 2005; for both years weekly obser- tween the number of embryos and the length vations were made from late summer to early of the female was tested using a linear regres- fall months. When conditions were not suit- sion in SYSTAT 9 (SYSTAT Software able at King Harbor due to a red tide ( June 1999). The null hypothesis that black perch 2005 through September 2005), observations did not differ from a 1:1 sex ratio was tested were conducted at Palos Verdes and Santa using a Goodness of fit test (G-test). Catalina Island (Pin Rock, Rock Quarry, and Empire Landing). Observations were conducted covering a results 100-m span of the breakwater. Five 5 5m Abundance and Length Frequency plots were established at 5-m and 10-m depths using cement blocks to outline the A total of 641 black perch was collected perimeters of plots along the breakwater. from January through November 2004 and Black perch within each plot were observed December 2005 through January 2006. from a minimum distance of 3 m for 5 min Sixty-eight individuals were obtained from (DeMartini 1988), and courtship behaviors power plant impingement, 90 by spearing, were noted. While courting was taking place, and 483 from gill nets (Table 1). Sizes ranged observations continued as long as the fish from 75 to 220 mm SL and from 18 to 487 g were visible. A minimum of three fish per plot total body weight. Overall, 45% (n ¼ 275) of were observed. If the fish being observed left black perch ranged from 150 to 160 mm SL. the plot it was noted and divers observed an- other fish within the same plot. If black perch Length-Weight Relationship were not seen in a plot, divers remained and watched the plot for 15 min to ensure that The length-weight function for all fish one did not enter. Divers noted, when possi- pooled (n ¼ 614) was W ¼ 0:000085L2:8636, ble, the sex of the individual (presence or and over 96% of the variance was explained absence of gonopodium) and the types and by the model (R2 ¼ 0:9629 [Figure 1]). The frequency of behaviors, including courtship, function did not differ significantly between 524 PACIFIC SCIENCE . October 2007

TABLE 1 Number of Black Perch (Embiotoca jacksoni) Collected at Each Site throughout Southern California, Separated by Collection Method: Gill Nets, Spearing, and Impingement (Total ¼ 641)

Catch Method

Stations Locations Gill Net Spear Impingement

Carlsbad Encina Power Plant 40 San Onofre SONGS 4 Newport Reef Pt. 17 Santa Catalina Island Salta Verde 24 Santa Catalina Island Empire Landing 11 Santa Catalina Island Catalina Harbor 34 Santa Catalina Island West Cove 3 Seal Beach Seal Beach 3 Los Angeles Breakwater LA Federal Breakwater 30 Palos Verdes Flat rock 145 10 Redondo Beach Redondo Power Plant 24 King Harbor King Harbor 39 Marina del Rey Marina del Rey 10 Malibu Malibu Pt. 58 Ventura Pitas Pt. 148 Santa Barbara Campus Pt. 20 Santa Barbara Coal Oil Pt. 21 Total 483 90 68 males and females (ANCOVA, F ¼ 0:12; laid down opaque bands starting in spring df ¼ 1;595; P ¼ 0:726). and decreasing in late summer (Figure 2). Therefore, opaque bands followed by translu- cent bands appeared to represent annual Age and Growth rings. Annual bands were formed in the otoliths of black perch. The majority of the specimens

Figure 2. Otolith edge analysis of annual formation of bands (opaque versus transparent ring at edge of otolith) of black perch captured each month from January 2004 Figure 1. Length-weight relationship of black perch through November 2004 (February not shown because (Embiotoca jacksoni) collected from January 2004 through only one fish was captured in February 2004) and De- November 2004 and December 2005 through January cember 2005 through January 2006. Pattern was seen 2006 from all southern California locations (n ¼ 614). among all age-classes. Life History and Courtship of Black Perch . Froeschke et al. 525

Figure 3. Mean length (mm SL) at age for black perch Figure 4. Length frequencies of all 614 black perch (Embiotoca jacksoni) from southern California. Error bars (Embiotoca jacksoni) collected from January 2004 through represent 1 standard deviation. Data were fit to the von November 2004 and December 2005 through January Bertalanffy growth equation and the von Bertalanffy pa- 2006 from all southern California locations, classified by rameters are listed. sex.

Sex Composition and Maturity Three hundred and fifty-seven black perch were used for the age analysis. Black perch Sex or maturity state was determined for 614 grow fastest in their first year, with a mean black perch throughout all locations and SL (mm) of 94.60 (G8.25) and grow approxi- sampling months. As expected for viviparous mately 30 mm SL each year thereafter (Fig- fishes, the sex ratio of black perch did not dif- ure 3). The von Bertalanffy equation for fer significantly from a 1:1 ratio (G-test, all black perch was determined to be Lt ¼ G ¼ 0:23, df ¼ 1, P ¼ :63) between females 217:9ð1 e0:3562ðt1:648ÞÞ (Figure 3). Of the (51%) and males (49%). Both sexes were seven age-classes age-class 0 had the smallest consistently represented throughout the size range (75–115 mm SL) and age-classes 2 classes, and immature fish were consistently (108–190) and 3 (130–212) both had the smaller than 100 mm SL (Figure 4). Overall, highest ranges (Table 2). Growth rates of males and females were similar in abundance males and females were not significantly dif- among age-classes 1–3. There were appar- ferent (ANCOVA, F ¼ 1:23; df ¼ 1;341; ently more males in age-classes 4 and 5 and P ¼ :26). more females in age-class 6.

Reproductive Characteristics and Behavior

TABLE 2 Black perch were observed courting from July through November in 2004 and 2005. Behav- Range of Standard Length (mm) by Age-Class For Black Perch (Embiotoca jacksoni) iors and seasonality of courtship appeared to be indistinguishable among the field sites and Age-Class Range (mm SL) n between them and the Long Beach Aquarium of the Pacific. During the months of court- 0 75–115 67 ing, territoriality was not observed, but fish 1 90–165 45 did appear to segregate by size class. Males 2 108–190 128 3 130–212 76 were never observed courting females smaller 4 153–220 31 than themselves. Courting was never ob- 5 189–215 5 served taking place at the shallow 5-m isobath 6 200–215 4 in King Harbor because that habitat was dom- 7 200 1 inated by nonreproductive juveniles. 526 PACIFIC SCIENCE . October 2007

Figure 5. Courtship behaviors seen in black perch (Embiotoca jacksoni) in King Harbor, Redondo Beach. Courtship postures consisted of males: (1) raising dorsal fins, (2) raising dorsal fins and fluttering pectoral fins, (3) raising dorsal fins and fluttering pectoral fins with their head pointed downward, (4) males rubbing their body against the substrate, (5) female approaching male, (6) male bumping side of female with its nose, (7) male rubbing against female, (8) male and female enter cave.

Courtship primarily occurred in close head pointed downward. Males also would (4) proximity to the bottom of the reef (10 m) rub the side of their body against any sub- at King Harbor around large boulders and strate in close proximity or along the bottom across the entire 100-m span of the break- of the reef. At that time (5) the female usually water studied. Black perch tended to aggre- approached (Figure 5). Once the female gate around one central point (e.g., a approached, the male would bump the side boulder) in large groups of up to 20 individu- of the female close to her pelvic fin with als. These aggregations consisted of males his snout and/or rub against the side of her and females swimming around the central body. After the female appeared receptive, point, with males performing courtship rit- the male would lead her to a nearby cave uals at a short distance from the group of (Figure 5). Copulation, never observed, was females. Never more than five males were assumed to occur in the cave. seen at one time performing courtship rituals. Peaks in male GSI occurred in the same Courtship postures consisted of males: (1) months that courtship was observed, with the raising dorsal fins, (2) raising dorsal fins and largest mean GSI in October (mean GSI ¼ fluttering pectoral fins, and (3) raising dorsal 1:55 G 0:06, n ¼ 66 [Figure 6]). Gravid fe- fins and fluttering pectoral fins with their males were first recorded in December, fol- Life History and Courtship of Black Perch . Froeschke et al. 527

Figure 6. Mean G standard error of gonosomatic Figure indices (GSI) for 276 male black perch (Embiotoca jack- 8. Relationship of number of embryos to length soni) from the Southern California Bight by month of (mm SL) of female black perch (Embiotoca jacksoni). capture from January 2004 through November 2004 and Larger females tended to carry more embryos (number from December 2005 through January 2006 (February of embryos ¼ 0:145ðSLÞ14:9; P ¼ :0010). and March 2004 were excluded due to low sample size). Data from January 2004 and January 2006 were pooled. positive relationship between length of the female and the number of embryos (regres- sion, R2 ¼ 0:4238; F ¼ 50:016; df ¼ 1;68; P ¼ :0010) was found, with the larger females carrying more embryos (Figure 8).

discussion Life History Black perch are fast-growing, short-lived fish. The fastest growth occurred in the first years, when size approximately doubled, and then growth tapered off to @30 mm SL each year thereafter. Sexes did not differ in size among age-classes, and both sexes had the same life Figure 7. Percentage of pregnant female black perch span. (Embiotoca jacksoni) in southern California by month. This study showed a decline in abundance Numbers above bars represent total number of females of age-class 4, and the maximum SL for each captured for each month. Due to low sample size (n ¼ 1) February is not shown. age-class was smaller than that from Isaacson and Isaacson (1966). Differences in length be- tween the studies probably result from col- lecting in widely separated regions. In this lowing the decline in male GSI, and were study we collected specimens throughout the present through June, indicating an overall Southern California Bight, whereas Isaacson 5- to 6-month gestation period (Figure 7). and Isaacson (1966) collected specimens Gestating females ranged from 135 to 190 from both Long Beach (southern California) mm SL (mean ¼ 163:44 G 0:104, n ¼ 70) and San Francisco (northern California). and carried between 4 and 17 embryos Species of surfperches often differ in their (mean ¼ 8:73 G 0:391). The highest percent- age and growth parameters between northern age of gestating females occurred in May and southern California, with northern popu- (96.67%, n ¼ 30), with the lowest occurring lations having a larger body size than south- in June (4.17%, n ¼ 24 [Figure 7]). Finally, a ern populations (DeMartini et al. 1983). 528 PACIFIC SCIENCE . October 2007

Isaacson and Isaacson (1966) did not separate tributions because reproductive behaviors individuals by location; therefore, the largest may play a role. Our data suggest that black individuals could very well have been solely perch migrated to deeper water for courtship from the northern California population. and returned to shallower water thereafter. However, the possibility remains that the Black perch might migrate to deeper water differences in fish length could represent for courting because of the topography of true differences within southern California the reef in deeper depths. In King Harbor, between this study and that of Isaacson and the majority of the caves and large boulders Isaacson (1966), indicating that the black are in deeper water, and this type of habitat perch population in southern California has could possibly provide protection from pred- decreased in length overall over the past 40 ators during courtship. yr for some reason. During courtship, males were the primary The paucity of black perch in age-classes aggressors and were never seen courting 5 and greater in this study may indicate that females significantly smaller or larger than the adult population is not surviving much themselves, similar to most surfperches past age four because of fishing pressure, (Hubbs 1917, 1921, Rechnitzer and Lim- predation, or habitat/food loss in southern baugh 1952, Weibe 1968a, b, Bane 1970, De- California. Martini 1988). Females appear to exercise the primary selection of mates because males per- formed courtship rituals within full view of Reproductive Characteristics and Behavior many females and the females then chose a Black perch at King Harbor, Redondo particular male. Female mate selection also Beach, courted from late July through early occurs among white seaperch (Goldberg November. Black perch thus have the longest 1978) and blue rockfish (Helvey 1982). Those documented season of courtship among studies support that female choice is prevalent surfperches. Shiner perch court from June among viviparous species, and it is probably through August (Hubbs 1921, Wiebe 1968b, a result of the female reproductive effort Bane 1970), and white seaperch only court exceeding the male’s contribution (Helvey from October to November (Goldberg 1978). 1982). The difference of the time frame of courtship Although black perch have been reported for black perch compared with other surf- as being territorial (Hixon 1981), this behav- perches could be an indication that black ior was not observed during times of court- perch are storing sperm during the breeding ship. The data reported here support the season, because gestating females were not observation that black perch are not territo- observed until 6 months after courtship rial at King Harbor (Pondella et al. 2002). originally began. However, further study is The lack of territorial behavior could result needed to test this hypothesis. from the large population present in King Black perch are similar to shiner perch in Harbor. The population of black perch at that both species court in large aggregations. King Harbor may exceed the density at which However, this study demonstrated that black holding territories is beneficial. Further work perch relocate to deeper water whereas shiner is necessary to determine if density does have perch relocate to shallower water for repro- an effect on territoriality of black perch in duction. Black perch are known to change King Harbor. their distribution from shallower water dur- Patterns in male black perch gonosomatic ing the winter and spring to deeper water index as well as the time of year when gestat- during the late summer and fall at King ing females were recorded both indicated that Harbor, Redondo Beach, because of increase reproduction occurred about the same time in temperature during the summer and fall throughout the Southern California Bight as months (Terry and Stephens 1976). The observed in King Harbor. Furthermore, male present study suggests that temperature may gonadal indices dropped at the same time not be the only factor influencing depth dis- gestation started, indicating that black perch Life History and Courtship of Black Perch . Froeschke et al. 529 are not storing sperm for as long as other because they did not distinguish between surfperches, such as shiner perch (Hubbs northern and southern California populations 1917, Weibe 1968b). in their study. Embryo number increased with female Both genetic and environmental factors size, which is common among surfperches have been suggested to influence the differ- (Behrens 1977, Goldberg 1978, DeMartini ences in life history and reproductive behav- et al. 1983, Baltz 1984). However, the mean iors of embiotocids (DeMartini et al. 1983). number of embryos (8:73 G 0:391) and the Two distinctive clades of black perch have number of embryos (n ¼ 17) reported in this been demonstrated, with the primary separa- study were lower then previously reported tion between the two clades occurring in (mean ¼ 14:4, total ¼ 31 [Behrens 1977]). Santa Monica Bay (Bernardi 2000, 2005). The differences between the mean and The study reported here included specimens total number of embryos between the two from both north and south of Santa Monica studies could be due to the fact that the Bay, and further investigation of these data majority of females in the study reported indicated that black perch from all locations here were captured with gill nets. It was exhibited similar life history traits. Therefore, apparent from personal observations (B.F.) the study reported here does not support the that some females abort their young when hypothesis that genetic differences affect the captured. behavior and life history of black perch The youngest female reported in this study throughout the population in the Southern to be sexually mature was 1 yr old. Female California Bight. Although further investiga- black perch also mature at age one in San tion is needed to determine the actual cause Francisco and Long Beach (Isaacson and of differences between seasonality of repro- Isaacson 1966) and not until age two at duction, age of maturity, and length, a plausi- Princeton Harbor, Mateo County (Behrens ble hypothesis is that the differences could be 1977, Baltz 1984). The discrepancies between a result of the different environmental factors these ages of maturity may reflect differences that black perch experience throughout their between northern and southern California range. The black perch reported by Behrens populations. In addition to being larger in (1977) and Isaacson and Isaacson (1966) in northern California surfperches have been northern California were from bays and es- shown to delay maturity and have higher fe- tuaries, and the black perch collected from cundity compared with southern California southern California in the study reported populations (DeMartini et al. 1983). Behrens here were primarily from rocky reefs and (1977) collected black perch from Princeton kelp beds. Although kelp beds have a high Harbor, Mateo County, in northern Califor- level of productivity, bays and estuaries are nia and recorded the youngest gestating fe- thought to have the greatest availability of male at age two with females gestating from food (Allen et al. 2006). Furthermore, species April through mid-November. On the other in northern California experience colder tem- hand, Isaacson and Isaacson (1966) collected peratures than species in southern California. black perch from Long Beach in southern A combination of the different types of habi- California and San Francisco in northern tats and seasonality or increase/decrease of California and reported their youngest ges- productivity and/or temperature may explain tating female to be age one with females the differences between the northern and gestating year-round. The most reasonable southern populations of black perch. explanation for the discrepancy among stud- ies is that black perch gestate at different acknowledgments times of the year in northern and southern California. Further, females in northern Cali- We thank Mark Steele and David Gray for fornia appear to delay maturity to age two. their valuable input throughout the course of Isaacson and Isaacson (1966) probably re- the study, especially Mark Steele for his assis- ported gestating females throughout the year tance with statistics. We also thank Edward 530 PACIFIC SCIENCE . October 2007

DeMartini for reviewing the paper and Craig, M. T., D. J. Pondella II, and J. C. Haf- providing helpful comments to improve the ner. 1999. Analysis of age and growth in manuscript. Thanks also to the many people two eastern pacific groupers (Serranidae: that participated in specimen collection and Epinephelinae). Bull. Mar. Sci. 65:807– diving. 814. DeMartini, E. E. 1969. A correlative study Literature Cited of the ecology and comparative feeding mechanism morphology of the Embiotoci- Allen, L. G., and D. J. Pondella II. 2006. Surf dae (surf-fishes) as evidence of the family’s zone, coastal pelagic zone, and harbors. adaptive radiation into available ecological Pages 149–166 in L. G. Allen, D. J. Pon- niches. Wasmann J. Biol. 27:177–247. della II, and M. H. Horn, eds. The ecol- ———. 1988. Size-assortive courtship and ogy of marine fishes: California and competition in two embiotocid fishes. adjacent waters. University of California Copeia 2:336–344. Press, Berkeley. DeMartini, E. E., T. O. Moore, and K. M. Allen, L. G., M. M. Yoklavich, G. M. Cailliet, Plummer. 1983. Reproductive and growth and M. H. Horn. 2006. Bays and estuaries. dynamics of argenteum (Em- Pages 119–147 in L. G. Allen, D. J. biotocidae) near San Diego, California. Pondella II, and M. H. Horn, eds. The Environ. Biol. 8:29–38. ecology of marine fishes: California and Ebeling, A. W., and D. R. Laur. 1985. adjacent waters. University of California The influence of plant cover on surfperch Press, Berkeley. abundance at an offshore temperate reef. Anderson, R. D., and C. F. Bryan. 1970. Age Environ. Biol. Fishes 12:169–179. and growth of three surfperches (Embio- FISHPARM. 1989. FISHPARM v3.0S. tocidae) from Humboldt Bay, California. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Bronxville, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 3:475–482. New York. Baltz, D. M. 1984. Life history variation Goldberg, S. R. 1978. Reproductive cycle of among female surfperches (: white seaperch, furcatus (Em- Embiotocidae). Environ. Biol. Fishes 10: biotocidae). Copeia 2:335–336. 259–171. Helvey, M. 1982. First observations of court- Bane, G. W. 1970. Studies on the shiner ship behavior in rockfish, Genus Sebastes. perch, Cymatogaster aggregata Gibbons, in Copeia 4:763–770. upper Newport Bay. Wasmann J. Biol. Hixon, M. A. 1981. An experimental analysis 28:22–25. of territoriality in the reef fish Embiotoca Behrens, D. W. 1977. Fecundity and repro- jacksoni (Embiotocidae). Copeia 3:653– duction of the viviparous perches Hypsurus 665. caryi (Agassiz) and Embiotoca jacksoni Agas- Holbrook, S. J., R. J. Schmitt, and J. S. Ste- siz. Calif. Fish Game 63:234–252. phens Jr. 1997. Changes in an assemblage Bernardi, G. 2000. Barriers to gene flow in of temperate reef fishes associated with a Embiotoca jacksoni, a marine fish lacking climate shift. Ecol. Appl. 7:1299–1310. a pelagic larval stage. Evolution 54:226– Horn, M. H., L. G. Allen, and R. N. Lea. 237. 2006. Biogeography. Pages 3–25 in L. G. ———. 2005. Phylogeography and demogra- Allen, D. J. Pondella II, and M. H. Horn, phy of sympatric sister surfperch species, eds. The ecology of marine fishes: Califor- Embiotoca jacksoni and E. lateralis along the nia and adjacent waters. University of Cal- California coast: Historical versus ecologi- ifornia Press, Berkeley. cal factors. Evolution 59:386–394. Hubbs, C. L. 1917. The breeding habits of Carlisle, J. G., Jr., C. H. Turner, and E. E. the viviparous perch, Cymtogaster aggre- Ebert. 1964. Artificial habitat in the ma- gata. Copeia 47:72–74. rine environment. Calif. Dep. Fish Game ———. 1921. The ecology and life-history of Fish Bull. 124. Amphigonopterus aurora and of other vivip- Life History and Courtship of Black Perch . Froeschke et al. 531

arous perches of California. Biol. Bull. Breeding habits of Hyperprosopon argente- (Woods Hole) 40:181–209. um: A viviparous fish of California. Cope- Isaacson, P. A., and D. M. Isaacson. 1966. ia 1952:41–42. Notes on the life history of the black StatSoft. 2007. STATISTICA v6.1. Stat- perch, Embiotoca jacksoni Agassiz. Trans. Soft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma. Am. Fish. Soc. 95:107–109. Stephens, J. S., Jr., R. J. Larson, and D. J. Karpov, K. A., D. P. Albin, and W. H. Van Pondella II. 2006. Rocky reefs and kelp Buskirk. 1995. The marine recreational beds. Pages 227–252 in L. G. Allen, D. J. fishery in northern and central California: Pondella II, and M. H. Horn, eds. The A historical comparison (1958–86), status ecology of marine fishes: California and of stocks (1980–86), and effects of changes adjacent waters. University of California in the California Current. Calif. Dep. Fish Press, Berkeley. Bull. 176. SYSTAT Software. 1999. SYSTAT 9. Sy- Leet, W. S., C. M. Dewees, R. Klingbeil, and stat Software, Inc., San Jose, California. E. J. Larson, eds. 2001. California’s living Terry, C. B., and J. S. Stephens Jr. 1976. A marine resources: A status report. Pages study of the orientation of selected embio- 236–240. California Resources Agency, tocid fishes to depth and shifting seasonal California Department of Fish and Game, vertical temperature gradients. Bull. South. Sacramento. Calif. Acad. Sci. 75:170–183. Miller, D. J., and R. N. Lea. 1972. Guide to Wiebe, J. P. 1968a. The effects of tempera- the coastal marine fishes of California. Cal- ture and daylength on the reproductive if. Dep. Fish Game Fish Bull. 157. physiology of the viviparous seaperch, Pondella, D. J., II, J. S. Stephens Jr., and M. Cymatogaster aggregata Gibbons. Can. J. T. Craig. 2002. Fish production of a tem- Zool. 46:1207–1219. perate artificial reef based on the density ———. 1968b. The reproductive cycle of of embiotocids (Teleostei: Perciformes). the viviparous seaperch, Cymatogaster ag- ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59:S88–93. gregata Gibbons. Can. J. Zool. 46:1221– Rechnitzer, A. B., and C. Limbaugh. 1952. 1234.