DOCSLIB.ORG

Morelia Camacho-Cervantes Phd Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morelia Camacho-Cervantes Phd Thesis HETEROSPECIFIC SOCIAL INTERACTIONS OF THE INVASIVE GUPPY (POECILIA RETICULATA): A POTENTIAL TRAIT TO ENHANCE INVASIVE SUCCESS Morelia Camacho-Cervantes A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2014 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/6561 This item is protected by original copyright Heterospecific social interactions of the invasive guppy (Poecilia reticulata): a potential trait to enhance invasive success A thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. at the University of St Andrews Morelia Camacho-Cervantes September 2014 Declaration I, Morelia Camacho-Cervantes, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 30,000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2011 and as a candidate for the degree of Ph.D. in September 2012; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2011 and 2014. Date Dec 11th 2014 Signature of candidate I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of Ph.D. in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree. Date Dec 11th 2014 Signature of supervisor In submitting this thesis to the University of St Andrews we understand that we are giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. We also understand that the title and the abstract will be published, and that a copy of the work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker, that my thesis will be electronically accessible for personal or research use unless exempt by award of an embargo as requested below, and that the library has the right to migrate my thesis into new electronic forms as required to ensure continued access to the thesis. We have obtained any third-party copyright permissions that may be required in order to allow such access and migration, or have requested the appropriate embargo below. The following is an agreed request by candidate and supervisor regarding the electronic publication of this thesis: Access to printed copy and electronic publication of thesis through the University of St Andrews. Date Dec 11th 2014 Signature of candidate Signature of supervisor ! Abstract From all the species that arrive to a novel environment, very few manage to form a viable population. The guppy, a very successful invader, is a highly social species that performs some of its vital tasks (e.g., foraging, avoiding predators) in groups. This thesis aimed to quantify heterospecific association benefits that enhance invasion success. Interactions between invaders and natives could be one of the environmental characteristics of a place that increase its risk of invasion. I evaluated the tendency of an invasive species to associate with native individuals with similar ecological requirements. I tested the hypothesis that invaders gain exploring, acquisition of information and foraging benefits when socializing with natives. In these experiments I used the guppy as the invasive model species and endangered native Mexican topminnows (Poeciliopsis infans, Skiffia bilineata, Ameca splendens, Zoogoneticus tequila, Xenotoca eiseni and Girardinichthys viviparous). I found that guppies shoal with other species in Trinidad (Poecilia picta and Poecilia sphenops), where they are native (Chapter 2) and that this trait remains when they are invasive (Chapter 3). Guppies are equally willing to explore novel environments when accompanied by heterospecifics or conspecifics. Guppies are more willing to explore complex environments than simple ones. Moreover, when exploring simple environments they have a higher association tendency, regardless of the partner’ species (Chapter 4), which could lead them to acquire the benefits of grouping behaviour and avoid Allee effects - the disadvantages of being part of a small group. In the contexts in which they were tested guppies gained as much information by associating with heterospecifics as with conspecifics (Chapter 5). Finally, I found that when shoaling in bigger shoals guppies are able to locate food faster and spent more time foraging. The benefits of increased shoal size were maintained when the additional guppies were replaced with heterospecifics. However, they derive more benefits from the species they are more willing to associate with (Chapter 6). These results uncover a mechanism enabling founding individuals to survive during the most vulnerable phase of an invasion and help explain why guppies have established viable populations in many parts of Mexico as well as in every continent except Antarctica. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Prof. Anne Magurran for her excellent supervision throughout my time at the University of St Andrews. I always came out of her office with better perspectives and more interesting ideas. I could not have completed this thesis without the support of Dr. Alfredo Ojanguren, who acted as a co-supervisor and had his door open for me and my questions at all times. Thanks to my tutor Prof. Thomas Meagher and my internal examiners Dr. Carl Smith and Dr. Jeff Graves for their helpful comments and discussions. To Al Reeve and Dr. Miguel Barbosa thanks for the endless discussions, the fieldwork and lab support. Thanks to Dr. Hideyasu Shimadzu, Dr. María Dornelas, Faye Moyes and the rest of the Fish Lunch discussion group members for sharing ideas and helping me better understand my data. And to my friends in México and St Andrews who helped me proofread chapters and articles, listened to my talk rehearsals and discussed with me scientific ideas or simply bureaucracy burdens. The work in México was possible thanks to the support of Dr. Constantino Macías at UNAM and Dr Omar Domínguez at UMSNH. Thanks to both and to the lab members of their groups, Laboratorio de Biología Acuática and Laboratorio de Conducta Animal respectively, especially to Edgar Luna and Diego Chechenquillo. Work in Trinidad was possible thanks to the support of Dr. Amy Deacon, Kharran Deonarienesingh and Dr. Indar Ramnarinne. In St Andrews, Dr. Andrew Whiston, Steve, Cara and the St Andrews Aquarium provided me with a population of goodeidae fish, thanks to them as well. Hugo Camacho and Cristian Cortés, thanks for driving me around so much to place data loggers and collect fish. María and Sofía Zirión, Hernando Rodríguez and Adrián Ortega, thanks for help me collect fish. Sorry about the sunken phone and Petrush’s injuries. Ian MacGregor-Fors, this whole doing-a-PhD idea started sitting next to you. Thanks for your help and support though the entire process. A very special thanks to my parents for their support in all the possible ways; from listening to everything I had to say and complaint about life abroad, science stuff or just anything, to financially support my trips to México and some of the fieldwork there. (Un agradecimento muy especial a mis padres por su apoyo en todas las formas posibles; desde escuchar todo lo que tuve que decir y quejarme de la vida fuera de México, ciencia o cualquier cosa, hasta su apoyo económico para pagar mis viajes a México y parte del trabajo de campo ahí. Gracias Oracio y Lupita por ayudarme incondicionalmente.) Finally, I want to thank my funding bodies CONACyT, COECyT and the Research Committee of the School of Biology. Para Duk y Abeja Heterospecific social interactions of the invasive guppy (Poecilia reticulata): a potential trait to enhance invasive success Contents 1. General Introduction 10 1.1 invasion process 12 1.2 Freshwater systems under threat 18 1.3 Benefits of living in groups during invasion 19 1.3.1 Shoaling behaviour 22 1.4 Allee effects 23 1.5 Heterospecific social interactions 26 1.6 The guppy, an ideal study species for invasion 26 1.7 Vulnerable Mexican fish communities 30 1.8 Aims 36 2. Association tendency and preference for 38 heterospecifics in an invasive species 2.1 Abstract 39 2.2 Introduction 40 2.2.1 Sociability 40 2.2.2 Heterospecific interactions 40 2.2.3 The social guppy 41 2.2.4 Aims 42 2.3 Methods 43 2.3.1 Data analysis 51 2.4 Results 52 2.4.1 Shoaling Tendency 52 2.4.2 Shoaling Preference 53 2.5. Discussion 54 3. High sociability as a key trait for invasion success: 57 a case study in the Mexican Central Plateau 3.1 Abstract 58 3.2 Introduction 59 3.2.1 Facilitation between species 59 3.2.2 Native species under risk 60 3.2.3 Aims 61 3.3 Methods 62 3.3.1 Data analysis 66 3.4 Results 66 3.5 Discussion 67 4. Boldness and exploratory behaviour with 70 heterospecifics in complex and simple habitats 4.1 Abstract 71 4.2 Introduction 72 4.2.1 Refuge use and exploring behaviour 72 4.2.2 Boldness 73 4.2.3 Aims 73 4.3 Methods 74 4.3.1 Data analysis 76 4.4 Results 77 4.4.1 Boldness 77 4.4.2 Exploring behaviour 78 4.5 Discussion 79 5. Transmission of information between native and 82 invasive fish species 5.1 Abstract 83 5.2 Introduction 84 5.2.1 Foraging in groups 84 5.2.2 Social learning 84 5.2.3 Aims 85 5.3 Methods 86 5.3.1 Data analysis 89 5.4 Results 90 5.5 Discussion 92 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Histochemical Characteristics of Macrophages of Butterfly Splitfin Ameca Splendens
    e-ISSN 1734-9168 Folia Biologica (Kraków), vol. 67 (2019), No 1 http://www.isez.pan.krakow.pl/en/folia-biologica.html https://doi.org/10.3409/fb_67-1.05 Histochemical Characteristics of Macrophages of Butterfly Splitfin Ameca splendens Ewelina LATOSZEK, Maciej KAMASZEWSKI , Konrad MILCZAREK, Kamila PUPPEL, Hubert SZUDROWICZ, Antoni ADAMSKI, Pawe³ BURY-BURZYMSKI, and Teresa OSTASZEWSKA Accepted March 18, 2019 Published online March 29, 2019 Issue online March 29, 2019 Original article LATOSZEK E., KAMASZEWSKI M., MILCZAREK K., PUPPEL K., SZUDROWICZ H., ADAMSKI A., BURY-BURZYMSKI P., OSTASZEWSKA T. 2019. Histochemical characteristics of macrophages of butterfly splitfin Ameca splendens. Folia Biologica (Kraków) 67: 53-60. The butterfly splitfin (Ameca splendens) is a fish species that belongs to the Goodeidae family. The biology of this species, which is today at risk of extinction in its natural habitats, has not been fully explored. The objective of the present study was to characterize melanomacrophages (MMs) and the melanomacrophage centers (MMCs) that they form, associated with the immunological system of butterfly splitfin. Butterfly splitfin is a potential new model species with a placenta for scientific research. In addition, knowledge about the location and characteristics of MMCs will allow the effective development of a conservation strategy for this species and monitoring of the natural environment. The results of histological analyses show that the immune system of fish aged 1 dph was completely developed. Single MMs were observed in hepatic sinusoids and in head kidney and their agglomerations were noticed in the exocrine pancreas and in the spleen. Hemosiderin was detected in single MMs in the head kidney of fish aged 1 dph, and in the spleen, exocrine pancreas and liver of older fish.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 JMIH Program Book Web Version 6-26-17.Pub
    Organizing Societies American Elasmobranch Society 33rd Annual Meeting President: Dean Grubbs Treasurer: Cathy Walsh Secretary: Jennifer Wyffels Editor and Webmaster: David Shiffman Immediate Past President: Chris Lowe American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists 97th Annual Meeting President: Carole Baldwin President Elect: Brian Crother Past President: Maureen A. Donnelly Prior Past President: Larry G. Allen Treasurer: F. Douglas Martin Secretary: Prosanta Chakrabarty Editor: Christopher Beachy Herpetologists’ League 75th Annual Meeting President: David M. Green Immediate Past President: James Spotila Vice-President: David Sever Treasurer: Laurie Mauger Secretary: Renata Platenburg Publications Secretary: Ken Cabarle Communications Secretary: Wendy Palin Herpetologica Editor: Stephen Mullin Herpetological Monographs Editor: Michael Harvey Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 60th Annual Meeting President: Richard Shine President-Elect: Marty Crump Immediate Past-President: Aaron Bauer Secretary: Marion R. Preest Treasurer: Kim Lovich Publications Secretary: Cari-Ann Hickerson Thank you to our generous sponsor We would like to thank the following: Local Hosts David Hillis, University of Texas at Austin, LHC Chair Dean Hendrickson, University of Texas at Austin Becca Tarvin, University of Texas at Austin Anne Chambers, University of Texas at Austin Christopher Peterson, University of Texas at Austin Volunteers We wish to thank the following volunteers who have helped make the Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Placenta Drives a Shift in Sexual Selection in Livebearing Fish
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature13451 The evolution of the placenta drives a shift in sexual selection in livebearing fish B. J. A. Pollux1,2, R. W. Meredith1,3, M. S. Springer1, T. Garland1 & D. N. Reznick1 The evolution of the placenta from a non-placental ancestor causes a species produce large, ‘costly’ (that is, fully provisioned) eggs5,6, gaining shift of maternal investment from pre- to post-fertilization, creating most reproductive benefits by carefully selecting suitable mates based a venue for parent–offspring conflicts during pregnancy1–4. Theory on phenotype or behaviour2. These females, however, run the risk of mat- predicts that the rise of these conflicts should drive a shift from a ing with genetically inferior (for example, closely related or dishonestly reliance on pre-copulatory female mate choice to polyandry in conjunc- signalling) males, because genetically incompatible males are generally tion with post-zygotic mechanisms of sexual selection2. This hypoth- not discernable at the phenotypic level10. Placental females may reduce esis has not yet been empirically tested. Here we apply comparative these risks by producing tiny, inexpensive eggs and creating large mixed- methods to test a key prediction of this hypothesis, which is that the paternity litters by mating with multiple males. They may then rely on evolution of placentation is associated with reduced pre-copulatory the expression of the paternal genomes to induce differential patterns of female mate choice. We exploit a unique quality of the livebearing fish post-zygotic maternal investment among the embryos and, in extreme family Poeciliidae: placentas have repeatedly evolved or been lost, cases, divert resources from genetically defective (incompatible) to viable creating diversity among closely related lineages in the presence or embryos1–4,6,11.
    [Show full text]
  • AC Summer 2008
    9 American Currents Vol. 34, No. 3 The Mummichog: Master of Survival Robert Bock 1602 Tilton Dr., Silver Spring, MD 20902, [email protected] Photographs by David Snell ew aquarium hobbyists have even heard of the filled an old laundry sink with a few inches of water, straight Mummichog. Others know it only as a bait fish. from the tap, and dropped them in. Chlorine didn’t appear to Yet this determined survivor is not only easy to care bother them too much. They lived for months. F for, but an interesting and attractive species worthy Back then, New Jersey’s Hackensack meadowlands were of aquarium study. shamefully polluted, both from massive garbage dumps that The Mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus, occurs in the filled the marshes and the many factories that sprang up along tidal waters of North America, from the Gulf of Saint the river. I can remember taking a few steps along the river Lawrence southward to northeastern Florida. The name bank, then looking back and seeing heavy black oil oozing “Mummichog” comes from an American Indian word that from my footprints. means “they go in great numbers.” Reaching a maximum Yet Mummichog were abundant. Frequently, I saw shoals length of about five inches, Mummichog are a shoaling fish of at least a thousand in the shallows. Similarly, shoals of that prefer the quieter waters of estuaries and salt marshes. Mummichog covered the surface of the toxin-laden ponds Like many coastal species, they can tolerate a wide range of that formed at the base of the landfills. salinities, ranging from fresh water to sea water.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index INDEX Note: page numbers in italics refer to fi gures, those in bold refer to tables and boxes. abducens nerve 55 activity cycles 499–522 inhibition 485 absorption effi ciency 72 annual patterns 515, 516, 517–22 interactions 485–6 abyssal zone 393 circadian rhythms 505 prey 445 Acanthaster planci (Crown-of-Thorns Starfi sh) diel patterns 499, 500, 501–2, 503–4, reduction 484 579 504–7 aggressive mimicry 428, 432–3 Acanthocybium (Wahoo) 15 light-induced 499, 500, 501–2, 503–4, aggressive resemblance 425–6 Acanthodii 178, 179 505 aglomerular 52 Acanthomorpha 284–8, 289 lunar patterns 507–9 agnathans Acanthopterygii 291–325 seasonal 509–15 gills 59, 60 Atherinomorpha 293–6 semilunar patterns 507–9 osmoregulation 101, 102 characteristics 291–2 supra-annual patterns 515, 516, 517–22 phylogeny 202 distribution 349, 350 tidal patterns 506–7 ventilation 59, 60 jaws 291 see also migration see also hagfi shes; lampreys Mugilomorpha 292–3, 294 adaptive response 106 agnathous fi shes see jawless fi shes pelagic 405 adaptive zones 534 agonistic interactions 83–4, 485–8 Percomorpha 296–325 adenohypophysis 91, 92 chemically mediated 484 pharyngeal jaws 291 adenosine triphosphate (ATP) 57 sound production 461–2 phylogeny 292, 293, 294 adipose fi n 35 visual 479 spines 449, 450 adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) 92 agricultural chemicals 605 Acanthothoraciformes 177 adrianichthyids 295 air breathing 60, 61–2, 62–4 acanthurids 318–19 adult fi shes 153, 154, 155–7 ammonia production 64, 100–1 Acanthuroidei 12, 318–19 death 156–7 amphibious 60 Acanthurus bahianus
    [Show full text]
  • The Etyfish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J
    CYPRINODONTIFORMES (part 3) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 3.0 - 13 Nov. 2020 Order CYPRINODONTIFORMES (part 3 of 4) Suborder CYPRINODONTOIDEI Family PANTANODONTIDAE Spine Killifishes Pantanodon Myers 1955 pan(tos), all; ano-, without; odon, tooth, referring to lack of teeth in P. podoxys (=stuhlmanni) Pantanodon madagascariensis (Arnoult 1963) -ensis, suffix denoting place: Madagascar, where it is endemic [extinct due to habitat loss] Pantanodon stuhlmanni (Ahl 1924) in honor of Franz Ludwig Stuhlmann (1863-1928), German Colonial Service, who, with Emin Pascha, led the German East Africa Expedition (1889-1892), during which type was collected Family CYPRINODONTIDAE Pupfishes 10 genera · 112 species/subspecies Subfamily Cubanichthyinae Island Pupfishes Cubanichthys Hubbs 1926 Cuba, where genus was thought to be endemic until generic placement of C. pengelleyi; ichthys, fish Cubanichthys cubensis (Eigenmann 1903) -ensis, suffix denoting place: Cuba, where it is endemic (including mainland and Isla de la Juventud, or Isle of Pines) Cubanichthys pengelleyi (Fowler 1939) in honor of Jamaican physician and medical officer Charles Edward Pengelley (1888-1966), who “obtained” type specimens and “sent interesting details of his experience with them as aquarium fishes” Yssolebias Huber 2012 yssos, javelin, referring to elongate and narrow dorsal and anal fins with sharp borders; lebias, Greek name for a kind of small fish, first applied to killifishes (“Les Lebias”) by Cuvier (1816) and now a
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Endangered Mexican Goodeid Livebearers: the Critical Role of the Aquarium Hobbyist
    Conserving Endangered Mexican Goodeid Livebearers: The Critical Role of the Aquarium Hobbyist Ameca splendens Dr. John Lyons University of Wisconsin Zoological Museum Outline 1) Who are the Goodeids? - Taxonomic definitions - Evolutionary relationships 2) Mexican Goodeid biology - Life history - Habitats 3) Mexican Goodeid status and conservation - Impacts and threats - Some dire statistics 4) How YOU, the hobbyist, can help - Captive maintenance - Involvement in ALA and GWG Lago Zirahuén, Michoacán, Mexico 1) Who are the Goodeids? A family of fishes (Goodeidae; aka “Splitfins”) in the order Cyprinodontiformes, with two subfamilies: Goodeinae Empetrichthyinae ~ 40 species (~ 87 ESU’s) 4 species (8 ESU’s) Central Mexico Southwestern USA Livebearers Egg Layers Skiffia lermae Crenichthys baileyi Current Goodeid Distribution Family ~ 16.5 million years old; subfamilies split 5-10 million years ago Durango Puerto Vallarta Mexico City In Mexico, a generalized Goodeid ancestor Fossilized Tapatia occidentalis, Barranca de Santa Rosa, Jalisco; from Pliocene Epoch, at least 2.6 million years ago gave rise to a rich modern fauna Goodeid Evolutionary Relationships Cyprinodontiformes Goodeidae (Tooth Carps): Profundulidae Family Tree Cyprinodontidae1 Fundulidae Poeciliidae Valenciidae Cyprinodontidae2 Are Goodeids and Rivulidae Poeciliids merely Nothobranchidae livebearing killies? Aplocheilidae (or vice versa)? 2) Mexican Goodeid Biology - Small (maximum size 1.5” to 7”; most ~ 2.5”) - Short-lived (mature in 1 year, max age 3-5 years) - Livebearers
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1.Xlsx
    Bone type Bone type Taxonomy Order/series Family Valid binomial Outdated binomial Notes Reference(s) (skeletal bone) (scales) Actinopterygii Incertae sedis Incertae sedis Incertae sedis †Birgeria stensioei cellular this study †Birgeria groenlandica cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Eurynotus crenatus cellular Goodrich, 1907; Schultze, 2016 †Mimipiscis toombsi †Mimia toombsi cellular Richter & Smith, 1995 †Moythomasia sp. cellular cellular Sire et al., 2009; Schultze, 2016 †Cheirolepidiformes †Cheirolepididae †Cheirolepis canadensis cellular cellular Goodrich, 1907; Sire et al., 2009; Zylberberg et al., 2016; Meunier et al. 2018a; this study Cladistia Polypteriformes Polypteridae †Bawitius sp. cellular Meunier et al., 2016 †Dajetella sudamericana cellular cellular Gayet & Meunier, 1992 Erpetoichthys calabaricus Calamoichthys sp. cellular Moss, 1961a; this study †Pollia suarezi cellular cellular Meunier & Gayet, 1996 Polypterus bichir cellular cellular Kölliker, 1859; Stéphan, 1900; Goodrich, 1907; Ørvig, 1978 Polypterus delhezi cellular this study Polypterus ornatipinnis cellular Totland et al., 2011 Polypterus senegalus cellular Sire et al., 2009 Polypterus sp. cellular Moss, 1961a †Scanilepis sp. cellular Sire et al., 2009 †Scanilepis dubia cellular cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Saurichthyiformes †Saurichthyidae †Saurichthys sp. cellular Scheyer et al., 2014 Chondrostei †Chondrosteiformes †Chondrosteidae †Chondrosteus acipenseroides cellular this study Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser baerii cellular Leprévost et al., 2017 Acipenser gueldenstaedtii
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    Downloaded from UvA-DARE, the institutional repository of the University of Amsterdam (UvA) http://dare.uva.nl/document/197409 File ID 197409 Filename Chapter 5 Geographic variation in Poecilia Bloch and Schneider, 1801 (Teleostei: Poeciliidae), with descriptions of three new species and lectotypes for P. dovii Günther, 1866 and for P. vandepolli van Lidth de Jeude, 1887 SOURCE (OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE): Type Dissertation Title From the Amazonriver to the Amazon molly and back again Author F. Poeser Faculty Faculty of Science Year 2003 Pages 180 ISBN 9076894329 FULL BIBLIOGRAPHIC DETAILS: http://dare.uva.nl/record/115955 Copyright It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl) 44 From the Amazon river to the Amazon molly and back again: Chapter 5 Geographic variation in Poecilia Bloch and Schneider, 1801 (Teleostei: Poeciliidae), with descriptions of three new species and lectotypes for P. dovii Giinther, 1866 and for P. vandepolli van Lidth de Jeude, 1887 Fred. N. Poeser Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, Department of Ichthyology, University of Amsterdam P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract The South American species with the vernacular name "mollies" are analyzed and three new species of the genus Poecilia are described and figured, viz., P. boesemani n. sp. from Trinidad, P. koperi n. sp. from Venezuela and Colombia, and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(S): Noel M
    Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 Author(s): Noel M. Burkhead Source: BioScience, 62(9):798-808. 2012. Published By: American Institute of Biological Sciences URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1525/bio.2012.62.9.5 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Articles Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 1900–2010 NOEL M. BURKHEAD Widespread evidence shows that the modern rates of extinction in many plants and animals exceed background rates in the fossil record. In the present article, I investigate this issue with regard to North American freshwater fishes. From 1898 to 2006, 57 taxa became extinct, and three distinct populations were extirpated from the continent. Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern extinctions varied by decade but significantly increased after 1950 (post-1950s mean = 7.5 extinct taxa per decade).
    [Show full text]