Dáil Éireann
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The 2013 Irish Legislation on Abortion: Turning-Point Or Missed Opportunity?
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND GALWAY European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2013/2014 The 2013 Irish legislation on abortion: turning-point or missed opportunity? A critical analysis from a human rights perspective Author: Chiara Cosentino Supervisor: Noelle Higgins Ackowledgements I would like to thank Noelle Higgins, from the NUI of Galway, for the supervision of the present work and for her precise and insightful comments and suggestions. Furthermore, I would like to deeply thank the contacted civil society organisations that kindly and enthusiastically agreed on allowing me to steal a bit of their time for interviews. They were fundamental for my analysis, for the perception from the ground they gave me, and for the global picture that I could capture from their different angles of perspective on the topic. In particular I would love to thank for their availability Richie Keane (Coordinator of Doctors For Choice), Sinéad Corcoran (member of the Policy and Advocacy Team of Abortion Right Campaign), Kelly Mackey (from the Campaign Office of Amnesty International Ireland), Maeve Taylor (Senior Policy and Advocacy Officer of the Irish Family Planning Association) and Dette McLoughlin, John Walshe and Joseph Loughnane (members of Galway Pro-Choice). I would also like to thank my family, my parents, my sister and my grandmother for their unconditional support, and for making my participation in this Master possible, both with their practical help and love. I missed them throughout this year, but we all know that, wherever I am, they are always in my heart. Moreover, I would like to thank all my friends, old and new, for what they mean and they will always mean to me. -
Dáil Éireann
DÁIL ÉIREANN AN COMHCHOISTE UM AN OCHTÚ LEASÚ AR AN MBUNREACHT JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITU- TION Dé Céadaoin, 25 Deireadh Fómhair 2017 Wednesday, 25 October 2017 The Joint Committee met at 1.30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Deputy James Browne, Senator Paul Gavan, Deputy Lisa Chambers, Senator Rónán Mullen, Deputy Ruth Coppinger, Senator Lynn Ruane. Deputy Clare Daly, Deputy Bernard J. Durkan, Deputy Peter Fitzpatrick, Deputy Billy Kelleher, Deputy Mattie McGrath, Deputy Catherine Murphy, Deputy Hildegarde Naughton, Deputy Jonathan O’Brien, Deputy Kate O’Connell, Deputy Louise O’Reilly, Deputy Jan O’Sullivan, Deputy Anne Rabbitte, SENATOR CATHERINE NOONE IN THE CHAIR. 1 JEAC The joint committee met in private session until 2.15 p.m. Business of Joint Committee Chairman: We are now in public session. I welcome members. I welcome viewers who may be watching our proceedings on Oireachtas television to this meeting in public session of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. We will be holding three separate sessions this afternoon. The first session will address risk to mental health; the second will address termination arising from rape and the third will look at personal experience of cases of fatal foetal abnormality. We had invited the support group One More Day to that third session, however, they could not make today’s session and the secretariat will accommodate them on a date in November. I welcome Professor Veronica O’Keane to the meeting, but before I introduce her I must attend to some housekeeping matters. There are two items of correspondence that I need to read into the record. -
A Reproductive Right, Or a Moral Profligacy?
A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT, OR A MORAL PROFLIGACY? A POLICY PAPER DISCUSSING THE LEGISLATIVE FUTURE FOR MALTA An Għaqda Studenti Tal-Liġi Policy Paper © Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi 2020 OPENING REMARKS INTRODUCTION It is with great pleasure that I present A multidisciplinary modus operandi was to you this year’s GħSL policy paper employed to offer a holistic discussion addressing the subject of Abortion, a and this was achieved through a paper which is the culmination of the thorough examination of pertinent comprehensive work of the GħSL Policy areas beyond the legal sphere such as Office. medical research, ethical considerations involved, as well as the psychological GħSL strives to keep law students as aspects, among others. well as society as a whole abreast regarding current legal issues in Malta. Moreover, a comparative exercise was An ongoing area of contention featuring carried out, whereby the laws regulating, across local media centres around the restricting and prohibiting abortion were topic of abortion. Due to the polarised evaluated. This contributed towards a views on this subject, the GħSL comprehensive outcome of this policy Executive Board decided that it would paper and provided a robust reference be opportune to delve into this topic. point for active and potential students alike. As a body representing the interests of law students, throughout this paper our Finally, I would like to thank the main focus was to maintain and uphold colleagues of GħSL, including all those an impartial appreciation of the law who contributed to this paper, namely while taking into account the sensitive Dr Desiree Attard, Andrew Sciberras, nature of this topic. -
A Reproductive Right, Or a Moral Profligacy? a Policy Paper Discussing the Legislative Future for Malta
A REPRODUCTIVE RIGHT, OR A MORAL PROFLIGACY? A POLICY PAPER DISCUSSING THE LEGISLATIVE FUTURE FOR MALTA An Għaqda Studenti Tal-Liġi Policy Paper © Għaqda Studenti tal-Liġi 2020 OPENING REMARKS INTRODUCTION It is with great pleasure that I present A multidisciplinary modus operandi was to you this year’s GħSL policy paper employed to offer a holistic discussion addressing the subject of Abortion, a and this was achieved through a paper which is the culmination of the thorough examination of pertinent comprehensive work of the GħSL Policy areas beyond the legal sphere such as Office. medical research, ethical considerations involved, as well as the psychological GħSL strives to keep law students as aspects, among others. well as society as a whole abreast regarding current legal issues in Malta. Moreover, a comparative exercise was An ongoing area of contention featuring carried out, whereby the laws regulating, across local media centres around the restricting and prohibiting abortion were topic of abortion. Due to the polarised evaluated. This contributed towards a views on this subject, the GħSL comprehensive outcome of this policy Executive Board decided that it would paper and provided a robust reference be opportune to delve into this topic. point for active and potential students alike. As a body representing the interests of law students, throughout this paper our Finally, I would like to thank the main focus was to maintain and uphold colleagues of GħSL, including all those an impartial appreciation of the law who contributed to this paper, namely while taking into account the sensitive Dr Desiree Attard, Andrew Sciberras, nature of this topic. -
20200214 Paul Loughlin Volume Two 2000 Hrs.Pdf
DEBATING CONTRACEPTION, ABORTION AND DIVORCE IN AN ERA OF CONTROVERSY AND CHANGE: NEW AGENDAS AND RTÉ RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMMES 1968‐2018 VOLUME TWO: APPENDICES Paul Loughlin, M. Phil. (Dub) A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Professor Eunan O’Halpin Contents Appendix One: Methodology. Construction of Base Catalogue ........................................ 3 Catalogue ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. BASE PROGRAMME CATALOGUE CONSTRUCTION USING MEDIAWEB ...................................... 148 1.2. EXTRACT - MASTER LIST 3 LAST REVIEWED 22/11/2018. 17:15H ...................................... 149 1.3. EXAMPLES OF MEDIAWEB ENTRIES .................................................................................. 150 1.4. CONSTRUCTION OF A TIMELINE ........................................................................................ 155 1.5. RTÉ TRANSITION TO DIGITISATION ................................................................................... 157 1.6. DETAILS OF METHODOLOGY AS IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS THESIS PRE-DIGITISATION ............. 159 1.7. CITATION ..................................................................................................................... 159 Appendix Two: ‘Abortion Stories’ from the RTÉ DriveTime Series ................................ 166 2.1. ANNA’S STORY ............................................................................................................. -
Article 40.3.3° and the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Limerick Institutional Repository 2013 Article 40.3.3 and the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013 1 Article 40.3.3 and the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013: The Impetus for, and Process of, Legislative Change Dr. Catherine O’Sullivan, Jennifer Schweppe and Dr. Eimear Spain This article serves as an introduction to this special edition of the I.J.L.S. on the recent developments on abortion law in Ireland. It briefly explains what were the two main drivers behind the introduction of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013, namely the European Court of Human Right’s judgment against Ireland in the case of A., B. & C. v. Ireland, no. 25579/05 [2010] E.C.H.R. 2032 (16 December 2010) and the untimely death of Savita Halappanavar. It then reviews a series of public hearings, heard by the Joint Committee on Health and Children in January and May 2013, on how to best meet Ireland’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights and under the Constitution. Finally it details the genesis of this special edition and introduces the work of the contributors. I – Introduction This special edition of the I.J.L.S. has arisen out of recent developments in the area of abortion law in Ireland. In brief, the passage of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013 (2013 Bill) through both Houses of the Oireachtas has been prompted by two main drivers. The first was the finding of the European Court of Human Rights (E.Ct.H.R.) in the December 2010 judgment of A., B. -
UCC Library and UCC Researchers Have Made This Item Openly Available
UCC Library and UCC researchers have made this item openly available. Please let us know how this has helped you. Thanks! Title Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General Author(s) Mullins, Jackie (Gertrude Jacqueline) Publication date 2013 Original citation Mullins, J. 2013. Not thinking straight? A critical discourse analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. Type of publication Doctoral thesis Link to publisher's http://library.ucc.ie/record=b2073900 version Access to the full text of the published version may require a subscription. Rights © 2013, Jackie Mullins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1128 from Downloaded on 2021-10-05T06:48:22Z TITLE PAGE Thesis Title: Not Thinking Straight? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 2006 Irish High Court Ruling in Zappone and Gilligan v. Revenue Commissioners and Attorney General Author: Jackie Mullins (Gertrude Jacqueline Mullins) Thesis submitted for PhD Thesis submitted to National University of Ireland, Cork Research conducted under School of Applied Social Studies, UCC Date of Submission: May 2013 Head of School: Professor Fred Powell Supervisors: Dr. Máire Leane and Dr. Jacqui O’Riordan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 10 What’s the Story? Interrogating the Constitutional and Legislative Position on Same-Sex Marriage in Ireland ............................................ 10 Background to the High Court Ruling .................................................... 12 Research Questions and Rationale ......................................................... -
Ive! FREE Catholic Monthly Newspaper Liar Journalist, Fake No
INSIDE Alive! FREE Catholic Monthly Newspaper Liar journalist, fake No. 252 February 2019 250,000 copies nationwide www.alive.ie news, cover-up at German magazine Ashley Bratcher Pages 7 & 8 Pro-choice poet’s pain at loss of her baby G See Page 6 Being a Catholic is most wonderful thing in the world Page 3 Higher Ed Unplanned star shocked deforming students’ to learn her own story minds See Page 5 G See Page 7 Mindfulness: story What is driving leftwing behind the latest hatred for marriage mega bucks fad Page 12 and the family Page 13 Liberals wrong: Human beings are not chemical scum Page 7 G The content of the newspaper Alive! and the views expressed in it are those of the editor and contributors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Irish Dominican Province. Alive! 2 February 2019 English bishop launches Christians in NE Syria fear Turkish army SPEAKING to young CHRISTIANS in the north east of Syria are alarmed at people in the year 2000 ‘Year of Holiness’ the threat posed to their very existence if the US Pope John Paul II quot- withdraws its troops and gives the green light for ed St. Catherine of Turkey to take over the war against Islamic State. Siena, “If you are what that sheds light on this for us in every moment of “We certainly want you should be, you will problem?” our lives.” to see no Turkish set the world ablaze.” Truth of faith And it is in the Church, troops entering Syria, given the bru- For Bishop Mark Davies in holy yet made up of sinners, Applying that principle, tal history of the England, being “what you that “we find everything we the bishop of Shrewsbury need to grow towards holi- 1915 massacres of should be” means being a Christians carried concluded that “the call to ness.” saint. -
Mervyn Taylor-1995 Acts
Leabharlann Náisiúnta na hÉireann National Library of Ireland Collection List No. 154 Mervyn Taylor Papers (MS 46,348 - MS 46,524) (Accession No. 4761) A collection of Mervyn Taylor’s papers from his time as the Minister for Equality and Law Reform, mostly covering the period 1993-1997. The papers predominantly consist of Governmental Acts, Bills and International Conventions relating to the reform of equality legislation in Ireland. Compiled by Luke Kirwan, 2009 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 6 I. Government Acts ......................................................................................................... 10 I.i. 1993 ............................................................................................................................. 10 I.i.1 Unfair Dismissals Act............................................................................................ 10 I.i.2 Social Welfare Act ................................................................................................ 11 I.i.3 Jurisdiction of Courts and Enforcement of Judgements Act ................................. 11 I.i.4 Interpretation Act................................................................................................... 12 I.ii. 1994 ............................................................................................................................ 13 I.ii.1 Maternity Protection Act ..................................................................................... -
In the Matter of an Application by the NI Human Rights Commission for JR
Trinity Term [2018] UKSC 27 On appeal from: [2017] NICA 42 JUDGMENT In the matter of an application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) Reference by the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland) before Lady Hale, President Lord Mance Lord Kerr Lord Wilson Lord Reed Lady Black Lord Lloyd-Jones JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 7 June 2018 Heard on 24, 25 and 26 October 2017 Appellant Respondent (1) (NIHRC) (Department of Justice) Nathalie Lieven QC Tony McGleenan QC Laura McMahon BL Paul McLaughlin BL David Blundell Emma McIlveen BL (Instructed by Northern (Instructed by Ireland Human Rights Departmental Solicitors Commission) Office, Department of Finance and Personnel) Respondent (2) (Attorney General for Northern Ireland) John F Larkin QC Attorney General for NI Martin Chamberlain QC Denise Kiley BL (Instructed by Office of The Attorney General for Northern Ireland) Interveners Counsel details Instructed by 1st Intervener – Humanists Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC Bhatt Murphy UK Fiona Murphy Mary-Rachel McCabe 2nd Intervener – Helen Mountfield QC Deighton Pierce Glynn United Nations Working Zoe Leventhal Group on the Issue of Anita Davies Discrimination Against Frances Raday Women in Law and Practice 3rd Intervener – (JR76) Karen Quinlivan QC Stephen Chambers Solicitors Sean Devine BL Ltd 4th Interveners – Monye Anyadike-Danes QC KRW Law (a) Sarah Ewart Adam Straw (b) Amnesty International 5th Interveners –