WSSV - White Spot Syndrome Virus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WSSV - White Spot Syndrome Virus WSSV - White spot syndrome virus RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Digestive tract Decapod anatomy Ventral Nerve chord Circulatory system Respiratory system Hematopoietic tissue Lymphoid organ Female reproductive tract Male reproductive tract RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 WSSV Envelope proteins Envelope Tegument Nucleocapsid Genome 210-380nm • dsDNA - ~300kbp • 185 ORFs Envelope extension • Baculovirales • Nimaviridae • Whispovirus RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 70-167nm “Baculovirales” WSSV Nimaviruses GpSGHV Hystrosaviruses MdGHV CcBV TnZBV Bracoviruses CiBV HzNV-1 PmNV Nudiviruses GbNV OrNV CunNPV NeleNPV Baculoviruses AcMNPV CpGV Wang Y, Jehle JA 2009. JIP 101: 187-193; Wang Y et al 2011. Vir Gen 42:444 – 456; Thézé J et al. 2011. PNAS ;108:15931-35 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 World's Production of Penaeid Shrimp 15 Total ) Capture 9 10 Aquaculture 75% Pounds (x 10 5 25% 0 1950 1970 1990 2010 Source: FAO RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Shrimp commodity production RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Shrimp Aquaculture Species Litopenaeus vannamei Penaeus monodon Fenneropenaeus chinensis Marsupenaeus japonicus RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Production of Farmed Shrimp - China 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 Millions of Pounds of Millions 100 50 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 Year RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Spread of WSSV 2002 1993 1995 1997 2002 1994 1992 1999 1994 1998 1999 1999 2005 1999 1996 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Emergence of White spot syndrome virus 1 km RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Emergence of White spot syndrome virus 1. Environment changes bringing new contacts More shrimp Ponds built in new areas – where shrimp never were or in low numbers More contact between other (terrestrial) arthropods and shrimp 2. Change in pathogen virulence 3. Introduced from elsewhere RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 World's Production of Penaeid Shrimp 15 Total Capture ) ) 9 9 10 Aquaculture 75% Pounds (x10 (x10 Pounds Pounds 5 25% 0 1950 1970 1990 2010 Source: FAO RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 More shrimp – more places Greater opportunity for contact between shrimp and other arthropods RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Hosts of WSSV • Shrimp – Penaeus – Exopalaemon – Armasus cinereum • monodon • orientalis – Scylla serrata • semisulcatus – Macrobrachium spp. – Sesarma spp. – Farfantepenaeus – Palaemon styliferuus – Sommanniathelpusa sp. • aztecus – Palaemonetes pugio – Thalamita sp. • duorarum • Crab – Uca spp. – Fenneropenaeus – Calappa lophos – Menippe adina • chinensis – Charybdis • Lobster • indicus • feriata – Panuluris • merguensis • natotor • longipes • penicillatus – Helice sp. • ornatus – Marsupenaeus – Portunus • argus • japonicus • pelagicus • Crayfish – Litopenaeus • Sanguineolentus – Procambarus clarkii • vannamei – Callinectes sapidus – Cherax quadricarinatus • stylirostris • setiferus – Metapenaeus ensis RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 WSSV Litopenaeus vannamei 1000 900 800 Weight 3 g 3 700 Density 550/m Dose 0.03 bw 600 final survival 0.00, 0.03 500 max daily mortality 1.0 ,0.6 400 Number of of shrimp Number 300 200 100 0 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Day RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Uca panacea Local decapods exposed to WSSV (China) 1.0 Armasus cinereum 0.9 0.8 0.7 Uca speciosa 0.6 0.5 Survival 0.4 Litopenaeus setiferus 0.3 0.2 0.1 Callinectes sapidus 0.0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Day RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Salt marshes RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Mississippi sound Biloxi Wolf Jourdan Pearl Lake Pontchartrain RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Prevalence of WSSV in decapods of Ms Sound Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) (8.3%, n=12) Purple marsh crab (Sesarma reticulatum) (10.0%, n=20) Gulf mud fiddler crab (Uca longisignalis) (50.0%, n=72) Panacea sand fiddler crab (U. panacea) (10.8%, n=1404) Mudflat fiddler crab (U. rapax) (23.0%, n=88) Spined fiddler crab (U. spinicarpa) (35.7%, n=98) Red-jointed fiddler crab (U. minax) (22.7%, n=22) Squareback marsh crab (Armasus cinereum) (26.7%, n=30) Daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio) (9.4%, n=1244) White shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) (20.0%, n=40) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Modeling WSSV in communities of decapods RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 WSSV life cycle diagram χ β λ αµ, Susceptible Infected Dead µ δ, η Host recruitment = − ⋅−−βIDtt − χ +− λµ St+1 SS tt(11( ) ( 1 ) ) β TransmissionLive λ IDtt TransmissionDead =+⋅−−β − χ −−− αµ ⋅− ⋅ It+1 IS tt(11( ) ( 1) ) ( 11( ) ( 1 )) It α MortalityWSSV χ MortalityNatural DDtt+1 = +−−(11( αµ) ⋅−( 1)) ⋅−−−It( 11( ηδ) ⋅−( 1 )) ⋅Dt δ DecayCarcass μ ConsumptionCarcass RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 η Transmission terms - Force of infection, λ, probability of infection after contact Ross S= SS- ⋅⋅β I Kermack-McKendrick tt+1 tt( ) I Reed-Frost S= SS- ⋅−(1t ) t+1 tt (1−β ) Black-Singer RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Force of Infection Probability of infection after contact with all infecteds Ross λβ=( ⋅ I ) I Reed-Frost λβ=−−11( ) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Ross S= S- β ⋅⋅ SI Kermack-McKendrick tt+1 ( tt) If β is probability of transmission after one S contacts one I Then S·I is number of contacts between every S and every I May have more infects than susceptibles Some transmissions are to the same susceptible SSSSSSS 1234567 I1 SI 11 SI 12 SI 13 SI 14 SI 15 SI 16 SI 17 I SI SI SI SI SI SI SI 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I SI SI SI SI SI SI SI 3 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 I Reed-Frost S= SS- ⋅−(1t ) t+1 tt (1−β ) Black-Singer β 1− β * *β 1− β 3 Ways to become infected 1 & not 2 β∗(1−β) or Only 1 way to remain uninfected not 1 & 2 (1−β)∗β 1 & 2 (1- β)∗(1−β) or 1 & 2 β∗β − β 2 β∗(1−β) + (1−β)∗β + β∗β (1 ) 1−− (1β ) 2 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Epidemic models – parameter estimates = − ⋅−−βχIDtt − St+1 SS tt(11( ) ( 1 ) ) = + ⋅−−βIDtt − χα −⋅ It+1 IS tt(11( ) ( 1 ) ) It DDtt+1 = +⋅−−−α I t(11( ηδ) ⋅−( 1 )) ⋅Dt RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – transmission (β, χ) It St+1 = SS tt − ⋅−−(1 (1β ) ) 1 S t ln1 S0 Solve for β β (1)= 1 − exp I 0 If t = 1 and I0 = 1: s β =1 − 1 s0 Theβ proportion infected after exposure to one infected shrimp RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – transmission (β, χ) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – transmission (β, χ) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – transmission (β, χ) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – transmission (β, χ) and virulence (α) • 1-L jars • 1 shrimp per jar • 5d incubation • Collect mortalities (α) • Collect survivors RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – virulence (α) It+1 =−⋅ II ttα 40 30 20 Survival 10 0 0 4 8 12 16 Time (h) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates – decay of transmission (δ) 1.0 decomposition transmission decreases by 48% per day χ 0.8 0.6 0.4 Transmission Transmission 0.2 0.0 0 4 8 12 Days after death y-intercept = 0.499 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates : consumption of shrimp decrease per hr (day) decrease per hr (day) η 17% (99) 1 shrimp 6% (79) 30% (100) 6 shrimp 11% (94) 34% (100) 12 shrimp 11% (94) 33% (100) 24 shrimp 12% (96) 1.0 1.0 Fasted Fed 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 Proportion Biomass Proportion Proportion Biomass Proportion 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 Time (hr) Time (hr) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Parameter estimates : consumption (η) & decomposition (δ) combined 0.48 + 1.00 - 1.0* 0.48= 1.00 0.48 + .79 - .79*.48= 0.89 An infected dead shrimp retains about 0 – 10% of its infectivity per day RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 Life table of infection State Duration Transmission Product 1 β Live Infected β α α Dead 1 χ χ Infected 11−−( δη)( 1 −) 11−−( δη)( 1 −) βχ R = + 0 α δ+−⋅ η δη 0.1 0.6 R =+=0.9 0 0.4 0.5+−⋅ 0.9 0.5 0.9 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 WSSV life cycle diagram 3-host community χ1,1 β3,1 χ3,1 β1,1 λ1 α1, µ1 Susceptible Infected Dead δ1, η1 µ1 χ1,2 β1,2 β2,1 χ2,1 β2,2 α µ 2, 2 λ2 Dead Infected Susceptible δ2, η2 µ2 χ2,2 χ3,2 β3,2 β2,3 χ2,3 α µ λ3 3, 3 Susceptible Infected Dead β3,3 δ3, η3 µ3 χ3,3 β1,3 χ1,3 RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015 WSSV 3-host community matrix model 3 IDii ∏(11−βχ1,ii) ⋅−( 1, ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i=1 3 IDii 11−∏( −βχ1,ii) ⋅−( 11, ) 1 − α1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = i 1 S1 0 α11−−( δη) ⋅−( 1 ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I1 3 ID ii D1 0 0 0∏( 11−βχ2,ii) ⋅−( 2, ) 0 0 0 0 0 i=1 S2 3 IDii ⋅ I 2 0 0 0 11−∏( −βχ2,ii) ⋅−( 12, ) 1 − α2 0 0 0 0 i=1 D2 0 0 0 0 α11−− δη ⋅− 1 0 0 0 S 2 ( ) ( ) 3 3 IDii I3 0 00 0 00∏( 1− β3,ii) ⋅−(1χ3, ) 00 i=1 D3 3 IDii 0 0 0 0 0 0 11−∏( −βχ3,ii) ⋅−( 13, ) 1 − α3 0 i=1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 α3 11−−( δη) ⋅−( 1 ) RCN Marine Disease Modeling and Transmission Workshop – May 2015.
Recommended publications
  • VITAE HARRIET MACGILL PERRY 872-4218 (Work)
    VITAE HARRIET MACGILL PERRY 872-4218 (work) PRESENT POSITION: Director, Center for Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564; Assistant Professor, Department of Coastal Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi EDUCATION: B.S., Biology, Florida State University, 1965. M.S., Zoology, University of Southern Mississippi, 1971. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE January 2000 to Present: Director, Center for Fisheries Research and Development, Institute of Marine Science, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, The University of Southern Mississippi. July 1998 to Present: Assistant Professor, Department of Coastal Sciences, Institute of Marine Science, The University of Southern Mississippi. October 1979 to Present: Research Biologist, Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. August 1968 to September 1979: Bio-technician, Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. MAJOR RESEARCH INTERESTS Fishery development, management of marine fisheries, blue crab aquaculture, population dynamics of estuarine and marine invertebrates, invertebrate taxonomy, invasive species. Gulf Guardian Award, The Alabama/Mississippi Rapid Assessment Program. PROCEEDINGS/BOOK CHAPTERS Co-editor - Proceedings of the Blue Crab Colloquium, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1982. Editor - Profile of the Blue Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1984. Co-editor - Proceedings of the National Symposium of the Soft-Shelled Blue Crab Fishery, Southeast Marine Advisory Service Network and Sea Grant Mid-Atlantic Advisory Service Network, 1985. Co-editor - The Blue Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States: A Regional Management Plan. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1990. Co-editor - A Profile of the Western Gulf Stone Crab, Menippe adina.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Spherical-Harmonics-Based Geometric Morphometrics
    Takustr. 7 Zuse Institute Berlin 14195 Berlin Germany YANNIC EGE,CHRISTIAN FOTH,DANIEL BAUM1, CHRISTIAN S. WIRKNER,STEFAN RICHTER Making spherical-harmonics-based Geometric Morphometrics (SPHARM) approachable for 3D images containing large cavity openings using Ambient Occlusion - a study using hermit crab claw shape variability 1 0000-0003-1550-7245 This is a preprint of a manuscript that will appear in Zoomorphology. ZIB Report 20-09 (March 2020) Zuse Institute Berlin Takustr. 7 14195 Berlin Germany Telephone: +49 30-84185-0 Telefax: +49 30-84185-125 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.zib.de ZIB-Report (Print) ISSN 1438-0064 ZIB-Report (Internet) ISSN 2192-7782 Making spherical-harmonics-based Geometric Morphometrics (SPHARM) approachable for 3D images containing large cavity openings using Ambient Occlusion - a study using hermit crab claw shape variability Yannic Ege1, Christian Foth2, Daniel Baum3, Christian S. Wirkner1, Stefan Richter1 1Allgemeine & Spezielle Zoologie, Institut für Biowissenschaften, Universität Rostock, Rostock, Germany 2Department of Geosciences, Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland 3ZIB - Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, Germany Correspondence : Yannic Ege, Allgemeine & Spezielle Zoologie, Institut für Biowissenschaften, Universität Rostock, Universitätsplatz 2, 18055 Rostock, Germany. E : [email protected] Abstract An advantageous property of mesh-based geometric morphometrics (GM) towards landmark-based approaches, is the possibility of precisely eXamining highly irregular shapes and highly topographic surfaces. In case of spherical-harmonics-based GM the main requirement is a completely closed mesh surface, which often is not given, especially when dealing with natural objects. Here we present a methodological workflow to prepare 3D segmentations containing large cavity openings for the conduction of spherical-harmonics-based GM.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT RINDONE, RICHARD RYAN. Predator-Prey Dynamics
    ABSTRACT RINDONE, RICHARD RYAN. Predator-prey Dynamics between Recently Established Stone Crabs (Menippe spp.) and Oyster Prey (Crassostrea virginica). (Under the direction of David B. Eggleston). Range expansion and population establishment of individual species can have significant impacts on previously established food webs and predator-prey dynamics. The stone crab (Menippe spp.) is found throughout southwestern North Atlantic waters, from North Carolina through the Gulf of Mexico and the Central American Caribbean, and including the Greater Antilles. Recent observations suggest that stone crabs have become better established on certain oyster reefs in North Carolina than in the early 1900’s when they we first observed in NC. To assess the predatory impact of stone crabs on oysters, we (1) quantified stone crab densities on subtidal oyster reefs in Pamlico Sound, NC using scuba diver surveys, and (2) conducted laboratory predation experiments to assess the functional response of stone crabs to varying densities of oysters. We then (3) analyzed previously unpublished functional response data on another important oyster predator, the mud crab Panopeus herbstii. Finally, we (4) compared and contrasted potential predatory impacts of stone, mud and blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus). The functional response data and analyses for stone crabs was consistent with either a type I or II functional response, whereas mud crabs exhibited a type I functional response. Mud crabs, on a m2 basis, inflicted the highest proportional mortality on oysters over a 24 hour period, followed by stone and then blue crabs. Proportional mortality did not vary significantly with oyster size; however, relatively small and large oysters were consumed disproportionately less than medium- sized oysters, likely due to the mechanical inability of stone crabs to handle small oysters, and the inability to crush large oysters.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacean Resources in The
    Cover photos courtesy of The Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center (SERTC), South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Research Needs for the Sustainable Management of Crustacean Resources in the South Atlantic Bight. Report from a workshop held at the Marine Resources Research Institute Charleston, South Carolina April 9-10, 2014 Authored by Jeff Brunson, Peter Kingsley-Smith, John Leffler, Blaik Keppler, Amy Fowler, Larry DeLancey and David Whitaker. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 RATIONALE AND OVERVIEW OF WORKSHOP 6 LIST OF WORKSHOP ATTENDEES 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 WORKSHOP AGENDA 9 IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH PRIORITIES 10 Blue crabs Disease 10 Habitat Condition and Loss 11 Climate Change 12 Stock Assessment 14 Penaeid shrimp Disease 16 Habitat Condition and Loss 18 Climate Change 19 Stock Assessment 21 Commercial Fisheries 22 Horseshoe crabs Disease 23 Habitat Condition and Loss 23 Climate Change 24 Stock Assessment 24 Fishery and Industry Practices 25 Stone crabs Hybrids 25 Disease 25 Habitat Condition and Loss 26 Climate Change 26 Stock Assessment 26 Fishery Practices 27 RESOURCE MANAGER PANEL SUMMARY 28 AREAS OF EXPERTISE OF WORKSHOP ATTENDEES 30 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY While the management authority for crustacean fisheries generally resides with individual states, crustacean resources are often interconnected within the region of the South Atlantic Bight. Declines among certain economically-important crustacean fisheries (i.e., blue crabs and shrimp) have been reported for both fishery-dependent and fishery-independent data region-wide since 2000. This workshop provided an opportunity for state resource managers and researchers to discuss issues affecting those fisheries and to attempt to identify approaches and resources for addressing the concerns raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Human Body: Linking Structure and Function Free
    THE HUMAN BODY: LINKING STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION DOWNLOAD FREE BOOK Bruce A. Carlson | 272 pages | 15 Jun 2018 | Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc | 9780128042540 | English | San Diego, United States Tissues, organs, & organ systems The structure and tissues of plants are of a dissimilar nature and they are studied in plant anatomy. Great Ideas in the History of Surgery. Retrieved 23 June McGraw Hill Higher Education. Andreas Vesalius of Brussels, — Functional anatomy of the vertebrates: an evolutionary perspective. The breakdown of glucose does release energy. The human heart is a responsible for pumping blood throughout our body. In addition to skin, the integumentary system includes hair and nails. And Why? Scottish Medical Journal. Be the first to write a review. Microtubules consists of a strong protein called tubulin and The Human Body: Linking Structure and Function are the 'heavy lifters' of the cytoskeleton. Initially, the membrane transport protein also called a carrier is in its closed configuration which does not allow substrates or other molecules to enter or leave the cell. Your Immune System: Information from the CDC about each organ in the lymphatic system, where it is found, and what they produce. Body plan Decapod anatomy Gastropod anatomy Insect morphology Spider anatomy. If you think about it, it's pretty amazing that the human body can do all of these things and more. As part of the immune system, the primary function of the lymphatic system is to transport a clear and colorless infection- fighting fluid called lymph, which contains white blood cells, throughout the body via the lymphatic vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Aspects of the Control of Posture and Locomotion in The
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 Comparative aspects of the control of posture and locomotion in the spider crab Libinia emarginata Andres Gabriel Vidal Gadea Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Vidal Gadea, Andres Gabriel, "Comparative aspects of the control of posture and locomotion in the spider crab Libinia emarginata" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3617. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3617 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF THE CONTROL OF POSTURE AND LOCOMOTION IN THE SPIDER CRAB LIBINIA EMARGINATA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Andrés Gabriel Vidal Gadea B.S. University of Victoria, 2003 May 2008 For Elsa and Roméo ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The journey that culminates as I begin to write these lines encompassed multiple countries, languages and experiences. Glancing back at it, a common denominator constantly appears time and time again. This is the many people that I had the great fortune to meet, and that many times directly or indirectly provided me with the necessary support allowing me to be here today.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Growth
    LARVAL GROWTH Edited by ADRIAN M.WENNER University of California, Santa Barbara OFFPRINT A.A.BALKEMA/ROTTERDAM/BOSTON DARRYL L.FELDER* / JOEL W.MARTIN** / JOSEPH W.GOY* * Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, USA ** Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA PATTERNS IN EARLY POSTLARVAL DEVELOPMENT OF DECAPODS ABSTRACT Early postlarval stages may differ from larval and adult phases of the life cycle in such characteristics as body size, morphology, molting frequency, growth rate, nutrient require­ ments, behavior, and habitat. Primarily by way of recent studies, information on these quaUties in early postlarvae has begun to accrue, information which has not been previously summarized. The change in form (metamorphosis) that occurs between larval and postlarval life is pronounced in some decapod groups but subtle in others. However, in almost all the Deca- poda, some ontogenetic changes in locomotion, feeding, and habitat coincide with meta­ morphosis and early postlarval growth. The postmetamorphic (first postlarval) stage, here­ in termed the decapodid, is often a particularly modified transitional stage; terms such as glaucothoe, puerulus, and megalopa have been applied to it. The postlarval stages that fol­ low the decapodid successively approach more closely the adult form. Morphogenesis of skeletal and other superficial features is particularly apparent at each molt, but histogenesis and organogenesis in early postlarvae is appreciable within intermolt periods. Except for the development of primary and secondary sexual organs, postmetamorphic change in internal anatomy is most pronounced in the first several postlarval instars, with the degree of anatomical reorganization and development decreasing in each of the later juvenile molts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Profile of the Wester Gulf Stone Crab, Menippe Adina 1995
    Gulf St tes Marine Fisher Commiss1 January 1995 o. 1 A PROFILE OF 1HE WF.STERN GULF STONE CRAB, Memppe adim by , The Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission TCC Crab Subcommittee edited by Vince Guillory Harriet M Perry Richard L. Leard published by Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission P.O. Box 726 Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39566-0726 January 1995 Number 31 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA26FI0026-03. This paper is funded by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its sub-agencies. ACKDOWieagements The GSMFC, TCC Crab Subcommittee gratefully acknowledges the support for and technical critique of the profile by Dr. Theresa Bert (Florida Department of Environmental Protection). We also thank Ms. Christine Trigg (Gulf Coast Research Laboratory [GCRL]) for supplying physiological data and technical review, Mr. Charles Dugas (Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries [LDWF]) for morphometric data from the fishery, Mr. Lee Usie (National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]) for landings data, and Mr. Walter Brehm (Clinical Research Laboratory, Keesler Air Force Base) for statistical analysis of data. We are also grateful for editorial review by Ms. Marjorie Williams (GCRL), Mr. Paul Prejean (LDWF), and Mr. Martin Bourgeois (LDWF). Special appreciation is extended to Mr. Dave Donaldson (GSMFC) for preparation of graphics and to Ms. Cindy Yocom for her special attention and dedication to the quality of this document. 1 Table of Omtents Page 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Devil Firefish, Red Lionfish U.S
    Devil Firefish, Red Lionfish Pterois miles, Pterois volitans ©Panaiotidi U.S. Trap, Spear October 12, 2015 Rachel Simon, Independent Research Analyst Disclaimer: Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch® program or its recommendations 2 on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch® is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. About Seafood Watch® Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans. Each sustainability recommendation on the regional pocket guides is supported by a Seafood Report. Each report synthesizes and analyzes the most current ecological, fisheries and ecosystem science on a species, then evaluates this information against the program’s conservation ethic to arrive at a recommendation of “Best Choices,” “Good Alternatives” or “Avoid.” The detailed evaluation methodology is available upon request. In producing the Seafood Reports, Seafood Watch® seeks out research published in academic, peer-reviewed journals whenever possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermit Crabs - Paguridae and Diogenidae
    Identification Guide to Marine Invertebrates of Texas by Brenda Bowling Texas Parks and Wildlife Department April 12, 2019 Version 4 Page 1 Marine Crabs of Texas Mole crab Yellow box crab Giant hermit Surf hermit Lepidopa benedicti Calappa sulcata Petrochirus diogenes Isocheles wurdemanni Family Albuneidae Family Calappidae Family Diogenidae Family Diogenidae Blue-spot hermit Thinstripe hermit Blue land crab Flecked box crab Paguristes hummi Clibanarius vittatus Cardisoma guanhumi Hepatus pudibundus Family Diogenidae Family Diogenidae Family Gecarcinidae Family Hepatidae Calico box crab Puerto Rican sand crab False arrow crab Pink purse crab Hepatus epheliticus Emerita portoricensis Metoporhaphis calcarata Persephona crinita Family Hepatidae Family Hippidae Family Inachidae Family Leucosiidae Mottled purse crab Stone crab Red-jointed fiddler crab Atlantic ghost crab Persephona mediterranea Menippe adina Uca minax Ocypode quadrata Family Leucosiidae Family Menippidae Family Ocypodidae Family Ocypodidae Mudflat fiddler crab Spined fiddler crab Longwrist hermit Flatclaw hermit Uca rapax Uca spinicarpa Pagurus longicarpus Pagurus pollicaris Family Ocypodidae Family Ocypodidae Family Paguridae Family Paguridae Dimpled hermit Brown banded hermit Flatback mud crab Estuarine mud crab Pagurus impressus Pagurus annulipes Eurypanopeus depressus Rithropanopeus harrisii Family Paguridae Family Paguridae Family Panopeidae Family Panopeidae Page 2 Smooth mud crab Gulf grassflat crab Oystershell mud crab Saltmarsh mud crab Hexapanopeus angustifrons Dyspanopeus
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Science Manual 9.9.2013.Pdf
    CITIZEN SCIENCE: LARVAL BLUE CRAB MONITORING PROJECT Docent Manual UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE MISSION ARANSAS NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE 1 Contents INTRODUCTION Project Overview _______________________ 3 Project Goals _______________________ 4 Background Information _______________________ 5 PROCEDURES Sample Collection _______________________ 8 Site Information _______________________ 10 Sample Analysis _______________________ 11 Crab Identification _______________________ 13 RESOURCES Frequently Asked Questions _______________________ 15 Citizen Science Contacts _______________________ 16 References _______________________ 17 APPENDICES Appendix A: Citizen Science Recruitment Flyer _______________________ 18 Appendix B: Potential Project Expansion _______________________ 19 Appendix C: Project Poster _______________________ 20 Photo courtesy of: http://sherpaguides.com/chesapeake_bay/natural_history/ 2 INTRODUCTION Project Overview The Citizen Science: Larval Blue Crab Monitoring Project was designed to monitor the spatial and temporal distribution of larval blue crabs throughout the Mission-Aransas Estuary. Blue crabs have been deemed, by Reserve stakeholders, a critically important species because of their roles as a main food source for the endangered Whooping Crane and for their economic value to Texas fisheries. Researchers have called upon volunteers to help collect data that researchers alone cannot collect. Without the help of these volunteers the Reserve would not have the ability to do such thorough sampling. These volunteers or, “citizen scientists,” enhance the research potential of the Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve (Mission-Aransas Reserve) and the University of Texas Marine Science Institute (UTMSI). Volunteers use collectors to sample larval blue crabs from selected sites within the Estuary and then prepare the samples for later analyses by UTMSI staff. The collectors are constructed from PVC pipe that is covered with a sleeve of ‘hogs-hair’ air-conditioning filter.
    [Show full text]
  • Warming and Pco2 Effects on Florida Stone Crab Larvae
    Warming and pCO2 effects on Florida stone crab larvae 3 ⃰Philip M. Gravinesea,b , Ian C. Enochsc,d , Derek P. Manzellod , and Robert van Woesika 4 aFlorida Institute of Technology, Department of Biological Sciences, 150 W. Univ. Blvd. 5 Melbourne, FL 32901, United States of America, [email protected] 6 bMote Marine Laboratory, Fisheries Ecology and Enhancement, 1600 Ken Thompson Way, 7 Sarasota, FL 34236, United States of America, [email protected] 8 cCooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, Rosenstiel School of Marine and 9 Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Key 10 Biscayne, FL 33149, United States of America, [email protected] 11 dAtlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories, National Oceanic and Atmospheric 12 Administration, 4301 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida, 33149, United States of America, 13 [email protected] 14 15 Corresponding⃰ author: [email protected] 16 Phone: 941-388-4441 17 18 Key Words: ocean acidification; climate change; crustacean; larval development; elevated pCO2; 19 elevated temperature; pH 20 21 Running Head: Effects of Temperature and OA on larval stone crabs 22 23 Abstract Greenhouse gas emissions are increasing ocean temperatures and the partial pressure of CO2 26 (pCO2), resulting in more acidic waters. It is presently unknown how elevated temperature and 27 pCO2 will influence the early life history stages of the majority of marine coastal species. We 28 investigated the combined effect of elevated temperature (30°C control and 32°C treatment) and 29 elevated pCO2 (450 µatm control and 1100 µatm treatment) on the (i) growth, (ii) survival, (iii) 30 condition, and (iv) morphology of larvae of the commercially important Florida stone crab, 31 Menippe mercenaria.
    [Show full text]