DOCSLIB.ORG

A Profile of the Wester Gulf Stone Crab, Menippe Adina 1995

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Profile of the Wester Gulf Stone Crab, Menippe Adina 1995 Gulf St tes Marine Fisher Commiss1 January 1995 o. 1 A PROFILE OF 1HE WF.STERN GULF STONE CRAB, Memppe adim by , The Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission TCC Crab Subcommittee edited by Vince Guillory Harriet M Perry Richard L. Leard published by Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission P.O. Box 726 Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39566-0726 January 1995 Number 31 A publication of the Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award Number NA26FI0026-03. This paper is funded by a grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its sub-agencies. ACKDOWieagements The GSMFC, TCC Crab Subcommittee gratefully acknowledges the support for and technical critique of the profile by Dr. Theresa Bert (Florida Department of Environmental Protection). We also thank Ms. Christine Trigg (Gulf Coast Research Laboratory [GCRL]) for supplying physiological data and technical review, Mr. Charles Dugas (Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries [LDWF]) for morphometric data from the fishery, Mr. Lee Usie (National Marine Fisheries Service [NMFS]) for landings data, and Mr. Walter Brehm (Clinical Research Laboratory, Keesler Air Force Base) for statistical analysis of data. We are also grateful for editorial review by Ms. Marjorie Williams (GCRL), Mr. Paul Prejean (LDWF), and Mr. Martin Bourgeois (LDWF). Special appreciation is extended to Mr. Dave Donaldson (GSMFC) for preparation of graphics and to Ms. Cindy Yocom for her special attention and dedication to the quality of this document. 1 Table of Omtents Page 1. 0 ltttrod11Ction . 1-1 2.0 Biological Description . 2-1 2.1 Classification . 2-1 2.2 Mo:rphology ............................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 l..arvae . 2-3 2.2.2 Juveniles . 2-3 2.2.3 Adults . 2-3 2.3 Age, Growth, and Maturation ................................................... 2-5 2.3.1 I...arvae .................................................................. 2-5 2.3 .2 Juveniles . 2-6 2.3.3 Adults .................................................................. 2-7 2.3.3.1 Size at Maturity .......................................................... 2-7 2.3 .3 .2 Age at Maturity . 2-7 2.3.3.3 Growth and Molting . 2-7 2.3 .3 .3 .1 Seasonality . : . 2-8 2.3 .3 .3 .2 Effects of Size . 2-8 2.3.3.3.3 Effects of Autotomy and Declawing .......................................... 2-8 2.3 .3 .3 .4 Variations by Sex · . 2-8 2.3 .3 .4 Claw Regeneration/Handedness . 2-9 2.4 Reproduction .............................................................. 2-9 2:4.1 Sex Ratios . 2-9 2.4.2 Mating and Fertiliz.ation . 2-10 2.4.2.1 Mating . 2-10 2.4.2.2 Fertiliz.ation . 2-10 2.4.3 Gonadal Development . 2-11 2.4.4 Spawning . 2-11 2.4.5 Fecundity ............................................................... 2-14 2.5 Pathology/Parasitology . 2-14 2.6 Trophic Relationships ....................................................... 2-14 2.6.1 l..arval Food llabits . 2-14 2.6.2 Juvenile Food llabits ....................................................... 2-15 2.6.3 Adult Food llabits ........................................................ 2-15 2.6.4 Predator-Prey Relationships . 2-16 2. 7 Movement and Migration . 2-16 2.8 Recruitment . 2-17 2.9 General Behavior . 2-18 3.0 Geographic Distribution and Habitat .............................................. 3-1 3 .1 Geographic Distribution . 3-1 3 .2 General llabitat Conditions . 3-1 3 .2.1 l..arvae . 3-1 3.2.2 Juveniles ................................................................ 3-1 3 .2.3 Adults . 3-1 3.2.4 Community Interrelationships .................................................. 3-2 3.3 Environmental Tolerances ..................................................... 3-2 3.3.1 Temperature and Salinity . 3-2 3.3.1.1 l..arvae . 3-3 3 .3 .1.2 Juveniles . 3-4 11 ..J • ..J .1 •..J .t\.UUlCS • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • . • . • 3-4 3.3.2 Dissolved Oxygen .......................................................... 3-6 3.3.3 Pollutantsffoxicants . 3-6 4.0 Description of the Ftshety . 4-1 4.1 Commercial Fishery .......................................................... 4-1 4.1.l Texas .................................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 l,ouisiana . 4-5 4.2 Recreational Fishery ......................................................... 4-5 4.3 Fishery-Related Population Characteristics .......................................... 4-5 4.3.l Texas .................................................................. 4-9 4.3 .2 l,ouisiana . 4-9 4.3.3 Mississippi .............................................................. 4-13 4.4 Fishery-Related Population Characteristics of M aiina ................................ 4-15 4.4.l Morphometric Relationships .................................................. 4-15 4.4.2 Biological Population Characteristics ............................................ 4-16 4.4.3 Implications for Management . 4-17 4.5 Potential for Directed Fishery Development . 4-18 4.5.l Texas ................................................................. 4-18 4.5.2 l,ouisiana ............................................................... 4-18 4.5.3 Mississippi .............................................................. 4-19 4.6 Mari.culture . 4-19 5.0 Rt:des rutd. :Regulations . 5-1 5.1 Florida (State Waters) ........................................................ 5-1 5.2 Alabama, Mississippi, and I.,ouisiana . 5-1 5.3 Texas . .. 5-2 5.4 Federal . 5-2 5.4.1 Size Restrictions . 5-2 5.4.2 liarvest Practices . 5-2 5.4.3 Seasons . 5-3 5.4.4 Closed Areas . 5-3 5.4.5 Gear Restrictions . 5-3 5.4.6 Vessel Enumeration . 5-3 5.4. 7 Statistical Reporting . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rvsd La Stone Crabs.Indd
    Artist Unknown LOUISIANA STONE CRABS By Jerald Horst In recent years, a small commercial recreational and fishery has developed for stone crabs in high- salinity bays across Louisiana. Stone crabs began to attract attention in the 1980s, when more of them began appearing in blue crab traps in coastal lakes and bays. In early 1985, LSU biologists conducted a study into the possibility of developing a fishery for them. Before that could occur, however, the great Christmas freeze of 1989 severely reduced the number of stone crabs in Louisiana’s coastal waters. Since then, stone crab numbers have increased to more than before 1989. Modest numbers are landed in some parts of the state for sale in the wholesale trade or for retail sales directly to the public. In some areas, numbers are high enough for recreational crabbers to target. The stone crab found in Louisiana is officially known as the Gulf stone crab, Menippe adina. It is very closely related to the Florida stone crab, Menippe mercenaria, but smaller, with some color differences. The Gulf stone crab has a dark brown body, compared to the tan or gray color of the Florida stone crab, and it doesn’t have bands or stripes around its legs like the Florida stone crab. The ranges of the two species overlap in the area of Apalachee Bay, Florida, where they hybridize. Gulf stone crabs seem to prefer slightly higher salinities than blue crabs, from full strength sea water at 35 parts per thousand (ppt) down to 10 ppt. They seem to prefer areas near or on oyster reefs, rock jetties or debris-cluttered bottoms, where they burrow in the mud for shelter, cold weather refuge and when molting their shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • VITAE HARRIET MACGILL PERRY 872-4218 (Work)
    VITAE HARRIET MACGILL PERRY 872-4218 (work) PRESENT POSITION: Director, Center for Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564; Assistant Professor, Department of Coastal Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi EDUCATION: B.S., Biology, Florida State University, 1965. M.S., Zoology, University of Southern Mississippi, 1971. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE January 2000 to Present: Director, Center for Fisheries Research and Development, Institute of Marine Science, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, The University of Southern Mississippi. July 1998 to Present: Assistant Professor, Department of Coastal Sciences, Institute of Marine Science, The University of Southern Mississippi. October 1979 to Present: Research Biologist, Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. August 1968 to September 1979: Bio-technician, Fisheries Research and Development, Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi. MAJOR RESEARCH INTERESTS Fishery development, management of marine fisheries, blue crab aquaculture, population dynamics of estuarine and marine invertebrates, invertebrate taxonomy, invasive species. Gulf Guardian Award, The Alabama/Mississippi Rapid Assessment Program. PROCEEDINGS/BOOK CHAPTERS Co-editor - Proceedings of the Blue Crab Colloquium, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1982. Editor - Profile of the Blue Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1984. Co-editor - Proceedings of the National Symposium of the Soft-Shelled Blue Crab Fishery, Southeast Marine Advisory Service Network and Sea Grant Mid-Atlantic Advisory Service Network, 1985. Co-editor - The Blue Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States: A Regional Management Plan. Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 1990. Co-editor - A Profile of the Western Gulf Stone Crab, Menippe adina.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin/U S Dept of Commerce National Oceanic
    LARVAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CUBAN STONE CRAB, MENlPPE NODlFRONS (BRACHYURA, XANTHIDAE), UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS WITH NOTES ON THE STATUS OF THE FAMILY MENIPPIDAE1 LumInA E. SCO,I'02 ABSTRACT The complete larval development of the Cuban stone crab, Menippc nodifrons, is described and illustrated. Larvae reared in the laboratory passed through a prezoeal, five and uncommonly six zoeal, and one megalopal stage. At 30" C the megalopal stage was attained in 16-17 clays, at 20" C, 28-37 days. The six zoeal stages of M. nodifrons are compared with those of its sympatric congener M. mcrc<'!laria and with the first zoeal stage of the Indo-Pacific species M. rumphii. Larvae ofthe genus Menippe may be distinguished from other xanthid larvae by a combination of morphological features, including lilltennal development (exopodite at least three-fourths the length ofprotopoditel, lack of setae on the basal segment of the second maxillipL'<!al endopodite, and number oflarval stages (Menippe, 5 or 6; most other xanthids, 4). Using Lebour's criteria (emphasizing antenna! development and number of zoeal stages) to determine the primitive or advancL'<! status of decapod larvae, the genus Menippe is more closely related to the phylogentically primitive family Cancriclae than to most of the Xanthidae. The possible reestablishment of the family Menippidae is discussed in view of new larval evidence. The Cuban stone crab, MCllippe llodij'rolls tions of West Africa (Capart 1951; Monod 1956), a Stimpson 1859, is a medium-sized xanthid crab survey of stomatopod and decapod crustaceans of closely allied to the common commercial stone Portuguese Guiana (Vilela ]951), and an ecologi­ crab, MCllippc I/lcrcenaria (Say 18] 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Original Stone Crab Fishery Management Plan
    FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN for the STONE CRAB FISHERY of the GULF OF MEX ICO GULF OF MEXICO FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL Tampa, Florida Prepared by a Gulf Council Task Team directed by the Southeast Fisheries Center, National Marine Fisheries Service M;ami, Flor;da 33149 .. 1\ ,, 1\' '."~~ f,'. 1. PREFACE This fishery management plan for stone crabs, Menippe mercenaria and M. nodifrons was prepared for the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council by a task team directed by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The following were members of the task team: Tom Costello (Task team leader) Southeast Fisheries Center Miami, Florida Theresa M. Bert Yale University Department of Biology New Haven. Connecticut David G. Cartano University of Miami Coral Gables. Florida Gary Davis (Task team leader for biological aspects of thfs plan) Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida Gale Lyon (Task team leader for economics of this plan) Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Tampa. Florida Charles Rockwood Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida John Stevely Florida Cooperative Extension Service Key West, Florida Joseph Tashiro Southeast Fisheries Center Miami Laboratory Miami, Florida W. Lee Trent National Marine Fisheries Service Panama City, Florida Donna Turgeon Marine Science Consortium Wallops Islands, Virginia James Zuboy Southeast Fisheries Center Miami, Florida i 2. SUMMARY This is a plan to manage the stone crab resources of the Gulf of Mexico. A1 though the pl an considers. the resource throughout its range from Florida to Texas, the area which will be regulated under this plan is confined to the waters of the West Coast of Florida, including the Keys, in the Fishery Conservation Zone (9 nautical to 200 miles).
    [Show full text]
  • Comportamento Predatório Ex Situ Do Caranguejo Menippe Nodifrons Stimpson, 1859 (Decapoda, Brachyura) Sobre Moluscos Gastrópodes
    Comportamento Predatório Ex situ do Caranguejo Menippe nodifrons Stimpson, 1859 (Decapoda, Brachyura) sobre Moluscos Gastrópodes 1 1 GIVANILDO XIMENES SANTANA , ANTÔNIO ADAUTO FONTELES FILHO , LUIS ERNESTO 2 1,3 ARRUDA BEZERRA & HELENA MATTHEWS-CASCON 1Pós-Graduação em Ciências Marinhas Tropicais, Instituto de Ciências do Mar (LABOMAR), Universidade Federal do Ceará, Av. da Abolição, 3207 - Meireles - CEP: 60165-081, Fortaleza, Ceará - Brasil. Email: [email protected] 2Pós-Graduação em Oceanografia, Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. da Arquitetura, S/N, Cidade Universitária. 50670-901 Recife, Pernambuco – Brasil. 3Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza, Ceará - Brasil 60455-760. Abstract. Predatory Behaviour Ex situ of the Stone Crab Menippe nodifrons Stimpson, 1859 (Decapoda, Brachyura) on Gastropods in Laboratory. Laboratory experiments were used to study the effect predation of the crab Menippe nodifrons Stimpson, 1859 on gastropods Stramonita haemastoma Linnaeus, 1758 Tegula viridula Gmelin, 1791 and Neritina virginea Linnaeus, 1758. The observed aspects had been of prey preference, handling time, predation techniques, prey critical size and chelal biomechanic analysis of the crabs. The crabs and the clams had been collected in the beach of the Pacheco, located in the city of Caucaia-Ce. Menippe nodifrons preferred Neritina virginea over both S. haemastoma and Tegula viridula, and S. haemastoma was strongly preferred over T. viridula. The males crabs preyed more heavily upon Neritina virginea than on both gastropods Stramonita haemastoma and Tegula viridula, while the females had eaten indistinctly the three gastropods. There were differences in hadling times between Neritina virginea, Stramonita haemastoma and Tegula viridula. The mean critical size for Neritina virginea was significantly smaller than for Stramonita haemastoma, which in turn was smaller than for Tegula viridula.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT RINDONE, RICHARD RYAN. Predator-Prey Dynamics
    ABSTRACT RINDONE, RICHARD RYAN. Predator-prey Dynamics between Recently Established Stone Crabs (Menippe spp.) and Oyster Prey (Crassostrea virginica). (Under the direction of David B. Eggleston). Range expansion and population establishment of individual species can have significant impacts on previously established food webs and predator-prey dynamics. The stone crab (Menippe spp.) is found throughout southwestern North Atlantic waters, from North Carolina through the Gulf of Mexico and the Central American Caribbean, and including the Greater Antilles. Recent observations suggest that stone crabs have become better established on certain oyster reefs in North Carolina than in the early 1900’s when they we first observed in NC. To assess the predatory impact of stone crabs on oysters, we (1) quantified stone crab densities on subtidal oyster reefs in Pamlico Sound, NC using scuba diver surveys, and (2) conducted laboratory predation experiments to assess the functional response of stone crabs to varying densities of oysters. We then (3) analyzed previously unpublished functional response data on another important oyster predator, the mud crab Panopeus herbstii. Finally, we (4) compared and contrasted potential predatory impacts of stone, mud and blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus). The functional response data and analyses for stone crabs was consistent with either a type I or II functional response, whereas mud crabs exhibited a type I functional response. Mud crabs, on a m2 basis, inflicted the highest proportional mortality on oysters over a 24 hour period, followed by stone and then blue crabs. Proportional mortality did not vary significantly with oyster size; however, relatively small and large oysters were consumed disproportionately less than medium- sized oysters, likely due to the mechanical inability of stone crabs to handle small oysters, and the inability to crush large oysters.
    [Show full text]
  • (Callinectes Sapidus) and Stone Crab E-ISSN 2358-2936 (Menippe Mercenaria) Jen L
    Nauplius ORIGINAL ARTICLE THE JOURNAL OF THE Grooming behaviors and gill fouling in BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIETY the commercially important blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) and stone crab e-ISSN 2358-2936 www.scielo.br/nau (Menippe mercenaria) www.crustacea.org.br Jen L. Wortham1 orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-5410 Stephanie Pascual1 1 College of Natural and Health Sciences, University of Tampa, 401 West Kennedy Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA ZOOBANK http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB965881-F248-4121- 8DCA-26F874E0F12A ABSTRACT Grooming behaviors reduce fouling of body regions. In decapods, grooming time budgets, body regions groomed, and grooming appendages are known in several species; however, little data exists on brachyuran crabs. In this study, grooming behaviors of two commercially important crabs were documented (blue crabs: Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, 1896; stone crabs: Menippe mercenaria Say, 1818). These crabs are harvested by fishermen and knowing their grooming behaviors is valuable, as clean crabs are preferred by consumers and the stone crab fishery consequence of removing one cheliped to grooming behaviors is unknown. Crabs were observed individually and agonistically to determine how grooming behaviors vary in the presence of another conspecific. Both species frequently use their maxillipeds and groom, with the gills being cleaned by epipods. Respiratory and sensory structures were groomed frequently in both species. Removal of a grooming appendage resulted in higher fouling levels in the gills, indicating that grooming behaviors do remove fouling. Overall, stone crabs had a larger individual time budget for grooming, but agonistic grooming time budgets were similar. Stone crab chelipeds are used in grooming, especially cleaning the other cheliped.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the American Lobster Transferable Trap Workshop
    Special Report No. 75 of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Proceedings of the American Lobster Transferable Trap Workshop October 2002 Proceedings of the American Lobster Transferable Trap Workshop October 2002 Edited by Heather M. Stirratt Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission Convened by: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission August 26, 2002 Washington, DC Proceedings of the American Lobster Transferable Trap Workshop ii Preface This document was prepared in cooperation with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s American Lobster Management Board, Technical Committee, Plan Development Team, Stock Assessment Subcommittee and the Advisory Panel. A report of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission pursuant to U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA17FG2205. Proceedings of the American Lobster Transferable Trap Workshop iii Acknowledgments This report is the result of a Workshop on transferable trap programs for American lobster which was held on August 26, 2002, in Washington, DC. The workshop was convened and organized by a Workshop Steering Committee composed of: David Spencer (Advisory Panel, Chair), George Doll (New York Commercial Lobsterman, Advisory Panel Member), John Sorlien (Rhode Island Commercial Lobsterman, Advisory Panel Member), Todd Jesse (Massachusetts Commercial Lobsterman, Advisory Panel Member), Ernie Beckwith (Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection), Mark Gibson (Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management),
    [Show full text]
  • Genus Panopeus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 Key to Species [Based on Rathbun, 1930, and Williams, 1983] 1
    610 Family Xanthidae Genus Panopeus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 Key to species [Based on Rathbun, 1930, and Williams, 1983] 1. Dark color of immovable finger continued more or less on palm, especially in males. 2 Dark color of immovable finger not continued on palm 7 2. (1) Outer edge of fourth lateral tooth longitudinal or nearly so. P. americanus Outer edge of fourth lateral tooth arcuate 3 3. (2) Edge of front thick, beveled, and with transverse groove P. bermudensis Edge of front if thick not transversely grooved 4 4. (3) Major chela with cusps of teeth on immovable finger not reaching above imaginary straight line drawn between tip and angle at juncture of finger with anterior margin of palm (= length immovable finger) 5 Major chela with cusps of teeth near midlength of immovable finger reaching above imaginary straight line drawn between tip and angle at juncture of finger with anterior margin of palm (= length immovable finger) 6 5. (4) Coalesced anterolateral teeth 1-2 separated by shallow rounded notch, 2 broader than but not so prominent as 1; 4 curved forward as much as 3; 5 much smaller than 4, acute and hooked forward; palm with distance between crest at base of movable finger and tip of cusp lateral to base of dactylus 0.7 or less length of immovable finger P. herbstii Coalesced anterolateral teeth 1-2 separated by deep rounded notch, adjacent slopes of 1 and 2 about equal, 2 nearly as prominent as 1; 4 not curved forward as much as 3; 5 much smaller than 4, usually projecting straight anterolaterally, sometimes slightly hooked; distance between crest of palm and tip of cusp lateral to base of movable finger 0.8 or more length of immovable finger P.
    [Show full text]
  • Crustacean Resources in The
    Cover photos courtesy of The Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center (SERTC), South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Research Needs for the Sustainable Management of Crustacean Resources in the South Atlantic Bight. Report from a workshop held at the Marine Resources Research Institute Charleston, South Carolina April 9-10, 2014 Authored by Jeff Brunson, Peter Kingsley-Smith, John Leffler, Blaik Keppler, Amy Fowler, Larry DeLancey and David Whitaker. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 RATIONALE AND OVERVIEW OF WORKSHOP 6 LIST OF WORKSHOP ATTENDEES 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 8 WORKSHOP AGENDA 9 IDENTIFICATION OF RESEARCH PRIORITIES 10 Blue crabs Disease 10 Habitat Condition and Loss 11 Climate Change 12 Stock Assessment 14 Penaeid shrimp Disease 16 Habitat Condition and Loss 18 Climate Change 19 Stock Assessment 21 Commercial Fisheries 22 Horseshoe crabs Disease 23 Habitat Condition and Loss 23 Climate Change 24 Stock Assessment 24 Fishery and Industry Practices 25 Stone crabs Hybrids 25 Disease 25 Habitat Condition and Loss 26 Climate Change 26 Stock Assessment 26 Fishery Practices 27 RESOURCE MANAGER PANEL SUMMARY 28 AREAS OF EXPERTISE OF WORKSHOP ATTENDEES 30 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY While the management authority for crustacean fisheries generally resides with individual states, crustacean resources are often interconnected within the region of the South Atlantic Bight. Declines among certain economically-important crustacean fisheries (i.e., blue crabs and shrimp) have been reported for both fishery-dependent and fishery-independent data region-wide since 2000. This workshop provided an opportunity for state resource managers and researchers to discuss issues affecting those fisheries and to attempt to identify approaches and resources for addressing the concerns raised.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Crab Menippe Mercenaria Contributor: Elizabeth Wenner, Ph.D
    Stone Crab Menippe mercenaria Contributor: Elizabeth Wenner, Ph.D. DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description Photo: Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center The stone crab is a true crab in the Family Xanthidae. The xanthid family of crabs is commonly called mud crabs. This is a highly diverse family characterized by having a body that is transversely oval or hexagonal and a broad front without rostrum. The last pair of legs is unmodified (Williams 1984). The shell of the stone crab is nearly smooth to the unaided eye and transversely oval with the front broad and notched centrally. The lateral margins of the carapace are divided into four lobes. The pincers are large and heavy, unequal in size and nearly smooth. The inside of the palm has a patch of fine, oblique and parallel striations. The walking legs are stout and hairy toward the end (Williams 1984). The claws of the stone crab are asymmetrical; there is a major or crusher claw and a minor or pincer claw. Only the claw of a stone crab is harvested and a legal size claw has a propodus base measurement of more than 70 mm (2.75 inches) (SCDNR 2005). In South Carolina, only the larger of the two claws may be taken (SCDNR 2005). The color of juveniles is generally dark purplish-blue, often with a white spot occurring on the inner carpus. Juveniles also exhibit three prominent white spots in the form of an inverted triangle on the carapace. Older individuals vary in color from brown to green on the anterior half of the carapace, with tan to cream coloration on the posterior half.
    [Show full text]