Yorkshire and Humber's Internal Migration Exchanges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yorkshire and Humber's Internal Migration Exchanges Winter 2008 The Yorkshire and Humber Regional Review 17 flows between local authority districts Yorkshire and which are inflated for certain missing values using patient re-registration counts collated from the NHS Central Humber’s internal Register (NHSCR). Are the patient register data robust and migration exchanges reliable? In the past, one of the main drawbacks indentified with the NHSCR data was the underrepresentation of Has the region experienced significant changes in its aggregate migration certain groups – in particular young exchanges with other parts of the country in the twenty-first century? Is the region males who may put off re-registering with losing human capital to the south in net terms? Which regions does the region gain a new doctor after they move home. most migrants from and lose most migrants to? This article provides answers to Comparison of age-specific in-migration these questions by using Office of National Statistics time series data extracted from and out-migration data from the patient patient registers held by health authorities. registers and the 2001 Census for a similar time period allows a reliability assessment to be made (Figure 1). The greatest differences occur in the younger age groups with a difference of responses from policy makers in terms of around 2,000 individuals estimated resource provision (particularly housing) migrating into Yorkshire and the Humber in in the south, but also increases in funding the 16-19 age group – the patient register from central government directed data estimating fewer flows than might be towards northern areas (particularly expected according to the Census. cities) which has intended to improve Whilst there are these small socio-economic conditions in these areas differences, the close correlation between and thus reduce some of the exodus to the census and patient register data Adam Dennett and John Stillwell the south. across most age groups gives confidence University of Leeds This article considers internal that, in other years, propensities and migration trends for Yorkshire and the patterns shown by the patient register Humber in recent years and linkages (especially for older age groups) are hilst international migration has with other regions in England and Wales likely to be relatively accurate. tended to grab the recent news are examined at a time when the global Wheadlines with the influx of economic downturn of recent months is workers to many regions in the UK from likely to result in a major decline in Time series migration trends the Eastern European accession (A8) migration propensities in the future. countries and a steady drip of refugees So what trends in migration has Yorkshire and asylum seekers, internal migration and the Humber experienced over the has received relatively less attention, Patient register data last few years? Figure 2 shows the net despite doing far more in many places to migration balances between Yorkshire change the structure and composition of Data on internal migration in the UK are and Humber and the other nine regions local populations. not extensive for inter-censal years, but in England and Wales between 1999 and The continued north-south drift of the Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2006. Where the rate is positive, population observed in the latter half of now produces statistics based on Yorkshire and the Humber has been a the twentieth century (Stillwell et al., comparison of the patient registers from net gainer of population from the region 1992; Champion, 1999), partly resulting one year to the next held by health in question; where it is negative, is has from the decline of traditional industrial authorities across the country. This been a net loser. activities, has lead to both reactionary procedure provides data on migration In 1999, Yorkshire and the Humber was gaining most migrants from the North East and losing most to the East Midlands. Over the eight year period 30000 shown in the graph, both the gains from In-migration to Yorkshire and Humber - 2001 Census the North East and the losses to the East In-migration to Yorkshire and Humber - Patient register data 25000 Midlands have decreased steadily so Out-migration to Yorkshire and Humber - 2001 Census that by 2006, the net gain from the North Out-migration to Yorkshire and Humber - Patient register data East has been eliminated whilst the loss 20000 to the East Midlands is well under half that of the 1999 level. 15000 There are, however, some notable changes in the net balances between Total migrants Total the region and London, the South East 10000 and East of England. In 1999, Yorkshire and the Humber was a net loser of 5000 population to all of these regions, albeit only marginally. By 2002, this had 0 changed to a net gain, and by 2004 a 0-15 16-19 20-24 20-25 30-44 45-59 60-74 75+ considerable net gain from all three. In Age Group fact in 2004 the region was gaining from all regions in the south as well as the Figure 1. Gross in and out-migration flows from the 2001 Census and patient registers North East. 18 The Yorkshire and Humber Regional Review Winter 2008 Whilst the region is starting to retain 0.3 more of its young adult migrants, many are still leaving and so the next question 0.2 North East is: where are they going to? Figure 4 North West gives an overview of net migration for a East Midlands combined 20-24 and 25-29 age group 0.1 West Midlands over the time period. East of England It is clear to see that London remains 0 the preferred location for young out- London migrants. This is no surprise as, for South East decades, the capital has pulled in Net migration rate -0.1 South West young migrants from all regions in the Wales UK with its many tertiary and quaternary -0.2 sector job opportunities and socio- cultural attractions. -0.3 However, the strong pull of the capital 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 appears to have weakened between 2002 and 2005, when there was a sharp drop in the net out-migration balance Figure 2. Net migration rates between Yorkshire and Humber and other regions in England from Yorkshire and the Humber, and Wales, 1999-2006 although the net rate of loss had increased again by 2006. The South East, East of England and the North After the peak of 2004, this net gain The annual gains in the student age West have also been net gainers of 20- declined virtually across the board, but group, however, are offset by significant 29 year olds over this period, although most noticeably, the net gains from losses in the 20-24 and 25-29 age the latter has remained relatively steady, London once again reverted to a net groups. Thus, whilst the region attracts with the two more southern regions loss by 2006. large numbers of students to some of following a similar trend to London, So, since 2001, the region has had a the UK’s finest higher education albeit at a lower rate over all years. positive net migration balance, institutions, the bad news is that it fails It appears, then, that whilst the north- attracting more migrants in aggregate to retain a large number of these south drift of population has reversed at than it has been losing, but what are the students after they finish their studies. the aggregate level, for the younger demographic characteristics of the On the other hand, the good news is sections of the population, the south, migrants that have been attracted to the that the net losses of young adults in their and London especially, remain a big region over this period compared with twenties are gradually declining. Of pull, attracting more migrants from the those that are moving away? Figure 3 course, not all of the out-migrants will be Yorkshire and Humberside than are throws some light on this by breaking students, but a large number will be and drawn in the opposite direction down the total net flows into eight age any increased retention of young, although the rate has decreased from groups associated with key stages in economically active individuals (students the level it once was in 1999. the life course. or not), can be viewed positively. But if the region is losing so many It is clear to see that the largest (and Furthermore, when this reduction of migrants in their early twenties but still increasing) numbers of in-migrants are outmigration is set against a backdrop gaining migrants overall, who, apart found in the 16-19 age group. This is of gradually increasing in-migration in from student migrants, is the region unsurprising considering the number of the 16-19 group, it can be speculated attracting to create an overall net gain large higher education institutions that the region is beginning to provide and where are these migrants coming based in the region’s major cities and more opportunities for the young and from? These questions are partially the expansion in numbers attending economically active, encouraging fewer answered by Figure 3, which shows higher education. of them to move away. positive balances in the 0-15, 30-44 and 45-59 age groups. These are the groups that are contributing most to the net gain of 8000 population. It is rare for migrants between the ages of 0-15 to move without a parent, and it is common for 6000 1999 the parents of children aged 0-15 to fall 2000 4000 into the 30-44 age bracket. 2001 Figure 5 shows that from 2001 2000 2002 onwards, the region from which 2003 Yorkshire and Humber was gaining 0 2004 most 30-44 year olds (and 2005 correspondingly the 0-15 year olds – not Net loss/gain -2000 2006 shown) is London.
Recommended publications
  • A Big Society in Yorkshire and Humber?
    A Big Society in Yorkshire and Humber? FINAL REPORT December 2010 A Big Society in Yorkshire and Humber? FINAL REPORT Peter Wells Jan Gilbertson Tony Gore Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University and Mark Crowe Yorkshire the Humber Forum Contact: Professor Peter Wells Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Sheffield Hallam University Unit 10, Science Park Howard Street Sheffield, S1 1WB email: [email protected] tel: 0114 225 6262 Acknowledgements We are very grateful to all those who participated in this research project. The research was funded under the ESRC Third Sector Research Fellows Pilot Programme (Award: RES-173- 27-0195) and involved Mark Crowe (Head of Development Yorkshire and Humber Forum) being seconded to the Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research (CRESR), Sheffield Hallam University. As Fellow, Mark worked in conjunction with Professor Peter Wells, Jan Gilbertson and Dr Tony Gore at CRESR. Mark’s work developed earlier data gathering and analysis undertaken by his colleague Andrew Scott at the Yorkshire and Humber Forum. We are grateful to our colleague Chris Dayson for comments on the draft report and to Dr Rob Macmillan (Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham) for comments and suggestions for further reading. The findings and conclusions presented however remain the responsibility of the authors. Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. i 1. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report on the Revocation of the Yorkshire and Humber Plan
    Environmental report on the revocation of the Yorkshire and Humber Plan www.communities.gov.uk Department for Communities and Local Government Eland House Bressenden Place London SW1E 5DU Telephone: 030 3444 0000 Website: www.communities.gov.uk © Crown Copyright, 2011 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. This publication, excluding logos, may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for research, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. If you require this publication in an alternative format please email [email protected] DCLG Publications Tel: 030 0123 1124 Fax: 030 0123 1125 Email: [email protected] Online via the website: www.communities.gov.uk October 2011 ISBN: 978 1 4098 3116 7 Environmental report on the revocation of the Yorkshire and Humber Plan Contents Non-technical summary Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: The Yorkshire and Humber Plan Chapter 3: Environmental Report Annex A: Regional Strategy policies and effects of revocation Annex B: Yorkshire and the Humber: Local plans (as at August 2011) 1 This Environmental Report is a consultation document on the likely significant environmental effects of revocation of the Yorkshire and Humber Plan (the regional strategy in force for Yorkshire and the Humber).
    [Show full text]
  • Humber SAP Final Report
    Humber LEP Skills Advisory Panel Report Data Analysis Final Report 2 Contents Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction 12 Stage 1: Analysis and definition of local landscape 15 Stage 2: Analysis of skills demand 51 Stage 3: Analysis of skills supply 72 Stage 4: Mapping of skills demand and supply 112 Stage 5: Conclusions 137 Appendix Survey Analysis Stakeholder Workshop Feedback Humber LEP Employment and Skills Board – Terms of Reference 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary 4 Introduction + Stage 4: Mapping of skills demand and supply The Humber Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) has a + Stage 5: Conclusions commitment to driving growth across the Humber Stage 1: Analysis and definition of local landscape economy for the benefit of communities in the four The analysis in Stage 1 provides an overview of the local authority areas of Hull, East Riding, North current economic and skills landscape in the Humber Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire. LEP and explains how it performs/has performed Crucial to ensuring the economic success of the relative to other geographical areas. Humber is having a well-skilled and productive The Humber LEP region is home to 930,000 people workforce which is able to take advantage of the and incorporates a diverse range of urban, rural, economic opportunities in the area. The development coastal and industrial locations. The region is a highly of the Skills Advisory Panel requirements, with the self-contained labour market, with many of those support of the Department for Education will provide living in the area also working locally. This presents the Humber LEP with high quality analysis of the skills both opportunities and challenges and makes the and employment needs to inform the area’s skills Humber more vulnerable to economic shocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber
    Spring Budget 2020 - Yorkshire and the Humber Today’s announcements for Yorkshire and the Humber include: • The government will invest a further £200 million over six years to pilot innovative actions that improve the long-term flood and coastal resilience of 25 local areas across the country, to ensure that they can better prepare for and adapt more quickly to flooding and coastal erosion. Funding, which will be around £6m per area, will be awarded to places at a strategic scale (reflecting county and river catchment boundaries), including those that contain communities which have repeatedly flooded, such as the Calder Valley, Severn Valley and Airedale. • In Yorkshire and the Humber, the increase to the National Living Wage (NLW) this April is expected to benefit around 198,000 people. • In Yorkshire and the Humber, the increase to National Insurance thresholds to £9,500 in 2020-21 will result in a tax cut for 2.4 million people and will lift 85,000 people out of paying Class 1 and Class 4 Nationl Insurance Contributions. • A five-year, intra-city transport settlement for Sheffield City Region and West Yorkshire Combined Authorities from a £4.2 billion envelope, starting in 2022-23 and subject to the implementation of their Mayoral Devolution Deals. While it will be for Mayors to come forward with plans, this could fund renewal of the Sheffield super-tram and support development of a modern, low carbon West Yorkshire mass rapid transit system. • £400 million spending on strategic road schemes between 2020 and 2025. This includes building the A63 Castle Street improvement in Hull.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and Humberside
    Taking Part 2015/16: YORKSHIRE AND HUMBERSIDE 1 This report provides an overview of the arts and cultural engagement of adults living in Yorkshire and Humberside. Data is taken from the Taking Part Survey 2015/16 and makes comparisons with 2010/11. All statistically significant differences are noted in the text and on the charts: - a statistically significant difference is a difference which is probably true and not due to chance - a non statistically significant difference is probably not a true difference and is likely to be due to chance * on the charts indicates a statistically significant difference between 2010/11 and 2015/16. + on the charts indicates a statistically significant difference between the region and England overall. More information about the Taking Part Survey can be found in Appendix A. A Technical Note on the survey is in Appendix B. 2 Contents The Yorkshire and Humberside Region .................................................................................................................... 4 The adult population in Yorkshire and Humberside region .......................................................................................... 5 Creative workforce of Yorkshire and Humberside .......................................................................................................... 6 Creative clusters in Yorkshire and Humberside .............................................................................................................. 6 Adult engagement in Yorkshire and Humberside ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber and Domestic Tourism
    Yorkshire and the Humber and Domestic Tourism Yorkshire and the Humber Yorkshire and The Humber comprises the counties of South, West, North and East Riding of Yorkshire, North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire. It has a population of almost 5.4 million, representing 10% of the total England population. Value to Domestic Tourism in England One in ten overnight trips and day visits in England are to Yorkshire and the Humber - 9.5 million overnight trips and 131 million day trips worth £1.7 billion and £4.1 billion respectively. Yorkshire and the Yorkshire and Total England Humber trips the Humber trips (as % of total) Domestic Overnight Trips Trips (millions) 92.61 9.45 10% Spend (£ millions) 18,085 1,728 10% Day Visits Trips (millions) 1,345 131 10% Spend (£ millions) 45,101 4,147 9% Trip Type Overnight Travel Half (51%) of domestic overnight trips to Yorkshire and the Humber are holidays, with both shorter breaks of one-three nights (33%) and 4+ night holidays (18%) taken more often to this destination than England as a whole (29% and 15% respectively). Conversely, there are fewer visits to friends and relatives (35% vs. 29%) and business trips (11% vs. 15%). Yorkshire % of Yorkshire and % of trips taken Total England and the the Humber trips by all trip takers Humber trips taken All Overnight Trips (millions) 92.61 100% 9.45 100% All Holidays 40.74 44% 4.83 51% 1-3 night holidays 26.47 29% 3.16 33% 4+ night holidays 14.27 15% 1.68 18% Visiting Friends and Relatives 35.91 39% 3.31 35% Business Travel 13.55 15% 1.07 11% Day Trips Trips in Yorkshire and the Humber are more likely to involve a night out (10% vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Levelling up Yorkshire and Humber: Health As the New Wealth Post-COVID Contents
    Levelling Up Yorkshire and Humber: health as the new wealth post-COVID Contents Foreword 3 Key points 5 Introduction: old challenges and new thinking 8 1. The foundation: three principles 9 2. Health and wealth in Yorkshire 15 and the Humber 3. Building on the foundations 22 4. Conclusion and next steps 27 References 36 #YHealth4growth | 2 Foreword On behalf of Yorkshire & Humber Academic Health Science Network, the NHS Confederation and Yorkshire Universities we are delighted to introduce our report: Levelling Up Yorkshire and Humber: health as the new wealth post-COVID. Since we held our inaugural YHealth for Growth conference in December 2019, the world has fundamentally changed. Unemployment has rapidly increased, and inequalities in health and wealth have been thrown into sharp focus. However, as we manage the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic and look towards living with and beyond COVID-19, the need to drive inclusive growth and the messages in this report have become more important than ever. In this report we explore the role of health in driving economic and inclusive growth in the Yorkshire and Humber region and recognise the clear linkages between health and wealth – we know that a healthy population is a productive and prosperous one and vice versa. We make a series of recommendations at both local and national level that we believe are fundamental to reset and recovery as we emerge from the pandemic. Yorkshire and the Humber as a region does not punch its weight in terms of economic output or positive health outcomes. However, the region has a huge range of assets and anchor institutions that represent a critical mass in terms of economic geographies, research base, infrastructure and industrial potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Scale and Scope of the Creative Industries in Yorkshire and the Humber
    This is a repository copy of Mapping the Scale and Scope of the Creative Industries in Yorkshire and the Humber. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/170491/ Version: Published Version Monograph: Swords, Jon orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-9566 and Townsend, Nathaniel Philip (2019) Mapping the Scale and Scope of the Creative Industries in Yorkshire and the Humber. Research Report. University of York Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Mapping the Scale and Scope of the Creative Industries in Yorkshire and the Humber Final Report Dr Jon Swords and Dr Nathan Townsend 1 XR Stories - Innovation in Screen Storytelling in the Age of Interactivity and Immersion XR Stories supports research and development for companies working in cutting-edge digital technologies in the Yorkshire and Humber region. We do this through a programme of funding, research collaboration and connection.
    [Show full text]
  • PS005 the Yorkshire and Humber Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2026 22 February 2013
    THE YORKSHIRE AND HUMBER PLAN The Yorkshire and Humber Plan is the Regional Spatial Strategy prepared in accordance with the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. It sets out OVERNMENT FFICE the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government’s policies in G O FOR YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER relation to the development of land within the region. It must be taken into account by local authorities in preparing their Local Development Frameworks and Local Transport Plans. It will also be an important influence on housing, economic development, waste, renaissance and other strategies, and guide the investment plans and priorities of a range of agencies and infrastructure and service providers. The Plan forms part of the statutory development plan The Yorkshire and Humber Plan for each district or unitary local authority area, so alongside local policies it The Yorkshire and Humber Plan must be taken into account in determining planning applications. The Yorkshire and Humber Assembly published the draft Yorkshire and Regional Spatial Strategy to 2026 Humber Plan for consultation in January 2006. An independent Panel held an Examination in Public in September and October 2006, and their report was published in May 2007. The Secretary of State published Proposed Changes for consultation between 28 September and 21 December 2007. This final TO NORTH EAST AND SCOTLAND version of the Plan is based on the earlier drafts and takes account of the TEES VALLEY representations made about the Proposed Changes and the findings of the CITY REGION Sustainability Appraisal / Strategic Environment Assessment and Habitat TO NORTH WEST Regulations Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire and the Humber Competitiveness and Employment Programme 2007-13
    YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER COMPETITIVENESS AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMME 2007-13 ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT 2014 CCI: 2007 UK162PO009 June 2015 1 PLEASE NOTE All financial information contained in this report is provided in both Sterling and in Euros. An exchange rate of £1 = €1.2113 (December 2014) is used throughout to convert Sterling amounts in the narrative sections of this report to Euros. 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: IDENTIFICATION AND INTRODUCTION 4 CHAPTER 2: OVERVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 5 2.1 Achievement and Analysis of Progress 5 2.2 Compliance with Community Law 33 2.3 Significant Problems Encountered and Measures Taken to Overcome Them 34 2.4 Changes in the Context of the Operational Programme Implementation 35 2.5 Substantial modification under Article 57 of Regulation (EC) 1083/2006 42 2.6 Complementarity with other instruments 42 2.7 Monitoring Arrangements 42 CHAPTER 3: IMPLEMENTATION BY PRIORITY 50 3.1 Priority 1: Promoting Innovation and R&D 51 3.2 Priority 2: Stimulating and Supporting Successful Enterprise 61 3.3 Priority 3: Sustainable Communities 74 3.4 Priority 4: Economic Infrastructure for a Competitive Economy 82 3.5 Priority 5: Technical Assistance 87 3.6 Priority Financial Allocations 90 CHAPTER 4: EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND 92 CHAPTER 5: MAJOR PROJECTS 93 CHAPTER 6: TECHNICAL ASSITANCE 97 CHAPTER 7: INFORMATION & PUBLICITY 98 ANNEXES A Beneficiary Data B Financial Engineering Instruments 3 Chapter 1: IDENTIFICATION AND INTRODUCTION 1.1 IDENTIFICATION Table 1 OPERATIONAL Objective: PROGRAMME Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisons of the Geographical Relationships of Local Economic Partnerships Areas and Leader Advisory Group Areas in England
    Defra Rural Communities Policy Unit Comparisons of the Geographical Relationships of Local Economic Partnerships Areas and Leader Advisory Group Areas in England. John Shepherd and Sam Waples, Rural Evidence Research Centre Birkbeck College June 2013 Comparisons of the Geographical Relationships of Local Economic Partnerships Areas and Leader Advisory Group Areas in England 1 Introduction 1.1 The Rural Evidence Research Centre working with the University of Lincoln and Rose Regeneration on the evaluation of the 2005 – 2013 RDPE Leader programme was asked to provide a range of economic and social data to enable an assessment to be made of the geographical relationship between the 39 English Local Economic Partnerships (LEPS) and the 64 English Leader Advisory Group Areas (LAGs). 1.2 The purpose of the analyses was to provide data on characteristics of LEPs and LAGs and areas where there was no LAG coverage. Where appropriate there was to be information provided on the characteristics of LAGs/LEPs by urban rural definition. 1.2 In this note we explain the way the various areas were derived, focusing on those which Defra regards as most significant for policy reasons. We highlight the more significant findings in the data via a number of summary tables below. The full data for the study are contained in a series of corresponding Excel tables. Maps are presented in annexes to the note. 2. The LAG/LEP Areas 2.1 The 64 LAG areas are mutually exclusive in geographical terms (i.e. do not overlap) but do not provide complete geographic coverage of the country (Annex Map 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Allocations Summary Table
    Area Name Region Total (£m) Tees Valley North East 17.4 Cornwall and Isles of Scilly South West 14.3 Sheffield City Region Yorkshire and The Humber 33.6 North East (includes North East and North of Tyne combined authorities) North East 47.0 East Midlands / Yorkshire and The Greater Lincolnshire Humber 25.8 Lancashire North West 34.1 West Yorkshire Yorkshire and The Humber 52.6 Humber Yorkshire and The Humber 13.4 West Midlands Combined Authority – working with Black Country LEP, Greater Birmingham and Solihul LEP and Coventry and Warwickshire LEP (for Coventry) West Midlands 66 Coventry and Warwickshire (for Warwickshire) West Midlands 8.1 Cumbria North West 10.5 Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire West Midlands 23.7 Worcestershire West Midlands 12.0 The Marches West Midlands 14.0 Heart of the South West South West 35.4 Derby, Derbyshire, Nottingham and Nottinghamshire East Midlands 44.4 South East South East / East of England 85.0 New Anglia East of England 32.1 Greater Manchester North West 54.2 Leicester and Leicestershire East Midlands 20.0 York and North Yorkshire Yorkshire and The Humber 15.4 GFirst South West 11.3 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough East of England 14.6 Liverpool City Region North West 26.0 Cheshire and Warrington North West 15.5 East Midlands / East of England / South East Midlands South East 27.3 Dorset South West 11.8 Buckinghamshire South East 7.7 Hertfordshire East of England 16.8 Swindon and Wiltshire South West 9.7 Solent South East 15.9 Coast to Capital South East 19.2 Oxfordshire South East 8.4 West of England South West 13.7 Enterprise M3 South East 13.3 Thames Valley Berkshire South East 7.5 London London 22.1 Total 900.0 .
    [Show full text]