Report and Accounts Year Ended 31St March 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report and Accounts Year Ended 31St March 2021 Report and Accounts Year ended 31st March 2021 Preserving the past, investing for the future Stall plate of The Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh KG KT OM GCVO GBE in The Queen’s Chapel of the Savoy annual report to 31st March 2021 Annual Report Report and accounts of the Duchy of Lancaster for the year ended 31 March 2021 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 2 of the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall (Accounts) Act 1838. annual report to 31st March 2021 Introduction Introduction History The Duchy of Lancaster is a private In 1265, King Henry III gifted to his estate in England and Wales second son Edmund (younger owned by Her Majesty The Queen brother of the future Edward I) as Duke of Lancaster. It has been the baronial lands of Simon de the personal estate of the reigning Montfort. A year later, he added Monarch since 1399 and is held the estate of Robert Ferrers, Earl separately from all other Crown of Derby and then the ‘honor, possessions. county, town and castle of Lancaster’, giving Edmund the new This ancient inheritance began title of Earl of Lancaster. over 750 years ago. Historically, its In 1267, Edmund also received growth was achieved via legacy, from his father the manor of alliance and forfeiture. In modern Newcastle-under-Lyme in times, growth and diversification Staffordshire, together with lands have been delivered through and estates in both Yorkshire active asset management. and Lancashire. This substantial inheritance was further enhanced Today, the estate covers 18,248 Her Majesty The Queen, Duke of by Edmund’s mother, Eleanor of Lancaster. hectares of rural land divided into Provence, who bestowed on him five Surveys: Cheshire, Lancashire, the manor of the Savoy in 1284. Southern, Staffordshire and Yorkshire. It also includes Foreshore Edmund’s inheritance passed to ownerships, a Minerals Survey and his son Thomas, Earl of Lancaster a significant Urban Survey which who was executed for rebellion is made up of a number of office, by King Edward II in 1322. Thomas’ retail and industrial properties lands and titles were forfeited but across the country. eventually passed to his brother Edmund Crouchback, Earl of Lancaster 1245-1296 © The Dean and Chapter of Westminster. Preserving the past, investing for the future 3 annual report to 31st March 2021 Introduction continued Henry and on his death to Henry’s other Crown possessions, remaining son, the celebrated diplomat and always with the House of Lancaster. soldier Henry Grosmont, on whom Edward III conferred the title Duke However, after the War of the of Lancaster ‘in recognition of (his) Roses, the bloodline of the historic astonishing deeds of prowess and Lancastrian kings was broken feats of arms’ in 1351. and Edward IV of York became King in 1461, taking possession Edward III also raised Lancaster of Henry VI’s forfeited estates. to the status of a County Palatine By Act of Parliament, Edward for the duration of Henry’s life. IV ‘incorporated’ the Duchy, Palatinate powers were devolved declaring that the Lancaster royal powers for use in regions inheritance should descend where central government was through the Monarchy as a private difficult. These devolved powers estate to be held ‘for ever to us gave the Duke of Lancaster and our heirs, Kings of England, administrative control of the law separate from all other Royal Stone carved likeness of John courts and the right to appoint O’Gaunt, Lancaster Castle. possessions.’ the sheriff, judges, justices of the peace and other senior officials Some 300 years later, under the serving the County. Crown Lands Act 1702, it was provided that the Sovereign When Henry Grosmont died in should only receive income and 1361, the inheritance became not capital from the Duchy. This part of his daughter Blanche’s remains the case today. dowry. She had married one of Edward III’s sons, John of Gaunt, The Duchy Today in 1359. John was thus made 2nd More than 750 years on, the Duke of Lancaster in 1362 and he Duchy of Lancaster has in large persuaded his father Edward III to part retained its historic land and grant the Palatinate powers to him property holdings. However, as a and his heirs permanently. modern portfolio, its assets also When John died in 1399, King include office, retail and industrial Richard II confiscated the property, as well as development Lancaster inheritance and land. banished John’s son, Henry The Duchy is administered by Bolingbroke, from England for life. the Chancellor of the Duchy Within the year, Henry Bolingbroke of Lancaster on behalf of the returned from exile, raised an army Sovereign. The Chancellor in turn Charter of Henry III to Edmund, and forced Richard to abdicate. delegates functions such as the 1267. He ascended the throne as Henry management of the property IV in October 1399. portfolio, financial investments One of Henry’s first acts as King and the discharge of the Duchy’s was to stipulate the conditions on administrative duties to the Duchy which the Lancaster inheritance Council. Members of Council are should be held. He specified that appointed by the Sovereign on the it should be held separately from advice of the Chancellor. The day- 4 Preserving the past, investing for the future annual report to 31st March 2021 to-day management of the Duchy Areas of focus over the last year is undertaken by the executive have included developing a team who report to the Council. greater understanding of the biodiversity across our holdings, The net revenue of the estate is sharing best practice around paid to the Keeper of the Privy responsible soil management and Purse for Her Majesty The Queen as improving the quality and scope Duke of Lancaster. The Duchy is not of our woodland. We will continue subject to corporation tax because to encourage our agricultural the Duchy is not a separate legal tenants to improve the quality entity for tax purposes. However, and productivity of the land they Her Majesty The Queen voluntarily farm while continuing to protect pays tax on all income received and preserve the Duchy’s historic from the Duchy. buildings and holdings. Guiding Principles Our business strategy is to continue to deliver sustainable revenue The Duchy of Lancaster is both The Duchy of Lancaster office, the custodian of an historic growth while working with our Savoy Estate, London. landed estate and a professional tenants and their communities organisation which must observe to provide appropriate help and the rigour and disciplines of a support wherever practicable. contemporary asset management company. Its role is to preserve and Working with tenants and partners enhance the value of the ancient across England and Wales, the inheritance while protecting Duchy Council remains keen to the lives and livelihoods of its support strategic diversification tenants and ensuring the long- and innovation as a means of term sustainability of the natural safeguarding the stability and long- environment. term sustainability of the estate as a whole. As a major owner of agricultural land and areas of outstanding Our business strategy is continually natural beauty across England reviewed and updated in response and Wales, the Duchy has to market changes to ensure that a responsibility to safeguard the business remains appropriately this natural capital for future focused and balanced. generations. Our partnership with our agricultural tenants therefore extends beyond the Lancaster Castle’s imposing John contractual and includes the O’Gaunt gate. provision of professional support and guidance. Land use is monitored and investment in new technologies and energy sources actively encouraged. Preserving the past, investing for the future 5 annual report to 31st March 2021 The Surveys Rural Surveys There are 11 main farms on Minerals There are five Rural Surveys within the estate which are involved the Duchy: Cheshire, Lancashire, in dairy, arable and livestock Southern, Staffordshire and production as well as equestrian Yorkshire. The Southern Survey businesses and woodlands. At combines the Duchy’s Lincolnshire Crewe Hall Farm the Duchy assets with those in Derbyshire, has created a highly sought- Northamptonshire and South after business address, with a Wales. number of companies in flexible office suites of varying sizes All five Surveys are managed in surrounded by views of the open house by a multi-disciplinary team countryside. The Duchy has an extensive mineral of rural surveyors, estate managers portfolio which extends from South The estate also includes a and rural accountants based in our Wales to North Yorkshire. It consists of residential lettings portfolio London and Lancaster offices. limestone and sandstone quarries which of 65 rural cottages and supply material to the UK construction farmhouses, as well as a roadside sector and a mine supplying gypsum to • Cheshire service area and a number of the cement industry. The Cheshire Survey extends to potential future development 1,550 hectares and is made up opportunities. of the Crewe estate to the south of the county and the smaller The smaller Marbury Estate on Marbury estate which lies on the Shropshire border consists of the Cheshire/Shropshire border. a single livestock farm and four Centred on the historic properties residential properties let to local of Crewe Hall and Crewe Hall people. Farm, the Crewe estate extends to 1,516 hectares, stretching from • Lancashire the edge of the town to the M6 The Lancashire Survey extends at Junction 16. to 3,943 hectares in total, comprising four rural estates: Myerscough, Salwick, Whitewell and Wyreside. The Duchy has owned Myerscough since the 13th century. There are six principal agricultural holdings on the 578-hectare estate, including three which form part of the renowned agricultural training centre at Myerscough College.
Recommended publications
  • Accounts of the Constables of Bristol Castle
    BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY'S PUBLICATIONS General Editor: PROFESSOR PATRICK MCGRATH, M.A., Assistant General Editor: MISS ELIZABETH RALPH, M .A., F.S.A. VOL. XXXIV ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN 1HE THIRTEENTH AND EARLY FOURTEENTH CENTURIES ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN THE THIR1EENTH AND EARLY FOUR1EENTH CENTURIES EDITED BY MARGARET SHARP Printed for the BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 1982 ISSN 0305-8730 © Margaret Sharp Produced for the Society by A1an Sutton Publishing Limited, Gloucester Printed in Great Britain by Redwood Burn Limited Trowbridge CONTENTS Page Abbreviations VI Preface XI Introduction Xlll Pandulf- 1221-24 1 Ralph de Wiliton - 1224-25 5 Burgesses of Bristol - 1224-25 8 Peter de la Mare - 1282-84 10 Peter de la Mare - 1289-91 22 Nicholas Fermbaud - 1294-96 28 Nicholas Fermbaud- 1300-1303 47 Appendix 1 - Lists of Lords of Castle 69 Appendix 2 - Lists of Constables 77 Appendix 3 - Dating 94 Bibliography 97 Index 111 ABBREVIATIONS Abbrev. Plac. Placitorum in domo Capitulari Westmon­ asteriensi asservatorum abbrevatio ... Ed. W. Dlingworth. Rec. Comm. London, 1811. Ann. Mon. Annales monastici Ed. H.R. Luard. 5v. (R S xxxvi) London, 1864-69. BBC British Borough Charters, 1216-1307. Ed. A. Ballard and J. Tait. 3v. Cambridge 1913-43. BOAS Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society Transactions (Author's name and the volume number quoted. Full details in bibliography). BIHR Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. BM British Museum - Now British Library. Book of Fees Liber Feodorum: the Book of Fees com­ monly called Testa de Nevill 3v. HMSO 1920-31. Book of Seals Sir Christopher Hatton's Book of Seals Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree 8/02 Large
    Pepin I Lord of Brabant Mayor unknown King LouisVII of Eleanor of Aquitaine Kenneth I King of of the Palace France Scots BEF 844 (1122 – 1204) of Austrasia d. 647 b.1120-1180 Hermangarde Hugh “The Black” Adelaide son of Louis VI of Also the wife of Henry II Robert I King of France Manasses de Vergi b. ? d. 920 Duke of Burgundy of Burgundy France and Adélaide unknown spouse Father: Boso of Burgundy Ermangarde of Thouars Ansegus Lord of Brabant Adelheid, Princess of France 882-921 father: Thierry II Count of Chaunois Mother: Trungard Princess of the West 884- Giselbert Count and Orleans Begga of of Darnau Margrave of Scheldt 830- 892 King Philip II of Constantine I King of Scots d. 685 Brabant Hildebrante /Liegarde Giselbert of Chalon Ermandgarde of France Herbert II Count de Vermandois 884-943 Lothair I King of Italy Emperor 865- ? b.1165-1223 Princess of France 895- 931 Duke of Burgundy Burgundy Hersent Princess of France Regnier I Duke of Lorraine of the West 795- 855 unknown spouse Roscille de Loches de Willandri Father: Herbert I Count of Senlis Count of Hainaut Hellentrude Pepin II “the Fat” Elfide 654-?/ 890- 956 908- ? Father: Charles II of Moselle 830- ? Father: Louis I The Pious Emperor of 874-? Mayor of the Palace “The Bald” Emperor of the West 850- 916 France Isabelle of Hainaut or Alpais - Mother: Adelaide of Herestal concubine 1170-1190 Donald II King of Scots b.631 d. 714 Fulk I “The Red” of Anjou King of Jerusalem 870- 942 Giselbert Duke Gerberga of Alfonso VIII, king of Castile unknown spouse Heribert “Nuestra” Charles Martel “The Hammer King” of the Gerberga Princess of Lorraine Saxony Mechtilde Saint of 1155-1214 “Count of Laon” Robert de Vermandois Adelaide of Albert “The Pious” 890- 939 925- 984 Ringleheim King Louis VIII of France Franks / Mayor of the palaces of Chrotrud of Gerberga of Gatinais 913- 960 of Lorraine Count of Troyes Burgundy Count of Vermandois 935-? Eleanor of England b.1162-1214 b.1187-1226 Austrasia, Neustria and Burgundy d.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} the End of the House of Lancaster by R.L
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The End of the House of Lancaster by R.L. Storey House of Lancaster. (lăng`kəstər) , royal family of England. The line was founded by the second son of Henry III, Edmund Crouchback, 1245–96, who was created earl of Lancaster in 1267. Earlier (1254) the prince had been made titular king of Sicily when the pope offered that crown to Henry III in order to keep Sicily and the Holy Roman Empire separated. However, the English barons refused financial support for the Sicilian wars, and the title was withdrawn (1258). Later Edmund fought for his brother, Edward I, in Wales and Gascony. His nickname "Crouchback," or crossed back, refers only to the fact that he went on crusade to Palestine in 1271 and, hence, was entitled to wear the cross. Edmund's son Thomas, earl of Lancaster, 1277?–1322, led the baronial opposition to his cousin Edward II Edward II, 1284–1327, king of England (1307–27), son of Edward I and Eleanor of Castile, called Edward of Carnarvon for his birthplace in Wales. The Influence of Gaveston . Click the link for more information. He was one of the lords ordainers and from 1314 to 1318 was virtual ruler of England. He tried unsuccessfully to drive the Despensers (see Despenser, Hugh le Despenser, Hugh le , d. 1265, chief justiciar of England. He joined the barons in their struggle against Henry III and received various offices, becoming chief justiciar in 1260. He lost this office in 1261 but was restored to it in 1263. Click the link for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • LAND REGISTRATION for the TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY a Conveyancing Revolution
    LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND COMMENTARY Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 9 July 2001 LAW COMMISSION H M LAND REGISTRY LAW COM NO 271 LONDON: The Stationery Office HC 114 The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. THE COMMISSIONERS ARE: The Honourable Mr Justice Carnwath CVO, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale Mr Stuart Bridge· Professor Martin Partington Judge Alan Wilkie QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers Her Majesty’s Land Registry, a separate department of government and now an Executive Agency, maintains the land registers for England and Wales and is responsible for delivering all land registration services under the Land Registration Act 1925. The Chief Land Registrar and Chief Executive is Mr Peter Collis The Solicitor to H M Land Registry is Mr Christopher West The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk · Mr Stuart Bridge was appointed Law Commissioner with effect from 2 July 2001. The terms of this report were agreed on 31 May 2001, while Mr Charles Harpum was a Law Commissioner. ii LAW COMMISSION HM LAND REGISTRY LAND REGISTRATION FOR THE TWENTY- FIRST CENTURY A Conveyancing Revolution CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: THE LAND REGISTRATION BILL AND
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Finalthesis Weber Pdf.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES FRACTURED POLITICS: DIPLOMACY, MARRIAGE, AND THE LAST PHASE OF THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR ARIEL WEBER SPRING 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Medieval Studies with honors in Medieval Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: Benjamin T. Hudson Professor of History and Medieval Studies Thesis Supervisor/Honors Adviser Robert Edwards Professor of English and Comparative Literature Thesis Reader * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The beginning of the Hundred Years War came about from relentless conflict between France and England, with roots that can be traced the whole way to the 11th century, following the Norman invasion of England. These periods of engagement were the result of English nobles both living in and possessing land in northwest France. In their efforts to prevent further bloodshed, the monarchs began to engage in marriage diplomacy; by sending a young princess to a rival country, the hope would be that her native people would be unwilling to wage war on a royal family that carried their own blood. While this method temporarily succeeded, the tradition would create serious issues of inheritance, and the beginning of the last phase of the Hundred Years War, and the last act of success on the part of the English, the Treaty of Troyes, is the culmination of the efforts of the French kings of the early 14th century to pacify their English neighbors, cousins, and nephews. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Plantagenet Claim to France...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alaris Capture Pro Software
    The Red Rose of Lancaster? JOHN ASHDOWN—HILL In the fifteenth century the rival houses of Lancaster and York fought the ‘Wars of the Roses’ for possession of the crown. When, in 1485, the new Tudor monarch, Henry VII, brought these wars to an end, he united, by his mam'age to Elizabeth of York, the red rose of Lancaster and the white rose of York, to create a new emblem and a new dynasty. Thus was born the Tudor rose. So might run a popular account, and botanists, searching through the lists of medieval rose cultivars, have even proposed identifications of the red rose of Lancaster with Rosa Gallica and the white rose of York with Rosa Alba, while the bi-coloured Tudor rose is linked to the naturally occurring variegated sport of Rosa Gallica known as ‘Rosa Mundi’ (Rosa Gallica versicolor), or alternatively, to the rather paler Rosa Damascena versicolor. It should, perhaps, be observed that Rosa Gallica, while somewhat variable in colour. is more likely to be a shade of pink than bright red, and Rosa Alba, while generally white in colour, also occurs in shades of pink, so that in nature the colour~distinction between the two roses is not always clear. ‘Rosa Mundi’ is also strictly speaking variegated in two shades of pink, rather than being literally red and white.‘ The label ‘Wars of the Roses’was a late invention, first employed only in 1829, by Sir Walter Scott, in his romantic novel Anne of Geierstein.2 The story of the rose emblems might appear on casual inspection to be well-founded, for we find ample evidence of Tudor roses bespattering Tudor coinage and royal architecture, for example, at Hampton Court, the Henry VII chapel at Westminster, and at Cambridge, on the gates of Christ’s and St John’s Colleges, and in King’s College chapel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crouchbank Legend Revisted T.P.J
    The Crouchbank Legend Revisted T.P.J. EDLIN With great interest I read John Ashdown-Hill’s stimulating article on the Lancastrian claim to the throne and Henry IV’s use of his descent from Edmund Crouchback, Earl of Lancaster and younger son of Henry III, to formulate a claim to the throne based on the legend that Edmund had in fact been the elder brother of Edward I. This brought to mind several additional thoughts which are set out here in the manner of an augmentation rather than a refutation. First, I discuss recent work which has advanced the claims of John Hardyng’s Chronicle as a source for the background to Henry IV’s usurpation and his use of the ‘Crouchback legend’, and which suggests that there was a systematic and ambitious plan to hijack chronicle evidence in Henry’s favour — a plan which failed, but may ultimately have helped to perpetuate a stubborn if ill-defined remnant of the Crouchback myth. Secondly, the poem Richard the Redeless will be considered, and the possibility that its guardedly Lancastrian perspective hints at the general currency of ideas about Henry’s legitimacy — and, at the same time, Richard II’s illegitimacy — as king. There are, in conclusion, some further thoughts on the differing interpretations of the meaning of Henry’s claim that he was taking the throne as the legitimate heir, ‘of the right line of the blood’ in descent from Henry III. It seems to me that the ‘contemporary tradition that ([Henry III’s son) Edmund was born before his brother Edward’ cited by John Ashdown-Hill refers to the life-time of John of Gaunt.2 Such a promotion (or even invention) of every possible (or impossible) right or claim within Gaunt’s immediate family was entirely consistent with his character and career.
    [Show full text]
  • Kew Gardens (Leases) (No
    KEW GARDENS (LEASES) (NO. 3) BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Kew Gardens (Leases) (No. 3) Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 25 April 2019 (HL Bill 174). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. HL Bill 174–EN 57/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 2 Policy background 2 Legal background 2 Territorial extent and application 2 Commentary on provisions of Bill 3 Clause 1: Power to grant a lease in respect of land at Kew Gardens 3 Clause 2: Extent, commencement and short title 3 Commencement 3 Financial implications of the Bill 3 Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights 3 Annex A – Territorial extent and application in the United Kingdom 4 Subject matter and legislative competence of devolved legislatures 4 These Explanatory Notes relate to the Kew Gardens (Leases) (No. 3) Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 25 April 2019 (HL Bill 174) 1 1 Overview of the Bill 1 This Bill provides that the Secretary of State's powers of management in relation to the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Kew) include powers to grant a lease over land at Kew for a term of up to 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • I Some General Points Section I
    -- SOME QUERIES ON HISTORICAL DETAIL A Report on World Without End a novel by Ken Follett, first draft Commissioned from Geoffrey Hindley for 31 I 07 I 06 Submitted by email attachment 01 I 08 I 06 The Report has rwo sections I Some general points II Points of detail noted by page numbered references Section I : Some general points: -A] ·dukes' etc Ken, a North Walian friend tells me that the sons of Cymru refer among themselves to our lot as Saes6n nevertheless, to the best of my knowledge there never was an archbishop of Monmouth p. 505, (though there was an archbishop of Lichfield in the late 700s!). I suppose the archbishop can be granted on the grounds of poetic licence but a duke of Monmouth (e.g. p. 34 7) does have me a little worried as a medievalist and not by the anachronistic pre-echo of the title of Charles II's bastard. On a simple fact of historical accuracy, I should point out that whereas the title was known on the continent - duke ofNormandy, duke of Saxony, duke of Brittany etc - up to 1337 the title of' 'duke' was unknown among English aristocratic nomenclature. The first award was to Edward III's eldest son (the Black Prince) as 'duke' of Cornwall (hitherto the duchy had been an earldom). The second ducal title was to Henry Grosmont elevated as 'Duke of Lancaster' in 1361. He too was of royal blood being in the direct male descent from Henry III's son Edmund Crouchback. His father the second earl of course lost his head after his defeat at the battle of Boroughbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Grosmont
    GWENT LOCAL HISTORY (Formerly Presenting Monmouthshire) - Number 97 On many occasions Local History cannot be meaningful in a purely 'local' context. An event or process identified in a particular place may be part of a much wider perspective that the local historian must be aware of in order to give his work its proper focus. The Battle of Grosmont was a turning-point in the Glyndwr Rebellion that had covered the length and breadth of Wales and the borders in the early years of the fifteenth century. Secretary: Jenny Render Editor: Tony Hopkins Gwent Record Office Autumn 2004 THE BATTLE OF GROSMONT, 1405: A reinterpretation by Nick Thomas-Symonds (researched by Gareth McCann) Introduction Owain Glyndwr was declared Prince of Wales on 16 September 1400 at his own manor. The apparent pretext was a disagreement with his neighbour, Lord Grey of Ruthin, over either a deliberately delayed summons for Glyndwr to accompany the king on his expedition to Scotland or a local boundary dispute. For Rees Davies, 'this was a premeditated act based on long-festering grievances and an attachment to the ideology of an independent Wales governed by its own native, legitimate ruler.'2 Indeed, from this apparently minor event, Wales was to become a region in revolt. The Battle of Grosmont is one of the Anglo-Welsh battles of this time. It occurred almost exactly half-way through the 'revolt' period of 1400-1409, in March 1405. The significance of the Battle of Grosmont can be located in the context of the Glyndwr revolt, or in terms of providing a brief historical window into the early character of Prince Henry of Monmouth, later Henry V (r.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Nature and the Identity of the Constitution During the Minority Of
    The Nature and the Identity of the Constitution during the Minority of Henry III (1216-1227) Submitted by Stephen Michael Gates to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Masters by Research in Law in June 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract This thesis investigates the nature of the thirteenth-century constitution by focusing on the minority of Henry III. It is argued that Henry’s succession to the throne was a demonstration of the complicated interaction between hereditary right, designation, and election. It is argued that the distribution of power within the government was, for the most part, ill-defined and varied throughout the minority’s course. It is also argued that there was a fundamental uncertainty about when the minority would end and what role Henry himself would play during the minority. Taken together, it is argued, these demonstrate that Henry’s minority was more of a political settlement than a constitutional settlement. This does not mean that England had no constitution during the thirteenth century but merely that it was more sensitive to the political dynamics of the time than perhaps modern constitutions are and that, compared to modern constitutions, it was much less well defined and lacking a clear unified philosophy.
    [Show full text]