The Molyneux Fam1:1Y Traces Its Descent from William Des Molines, 80 Named from Moulins, a Town of Bourbounois, in France, Who I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Molyneux Fam1:1Y Traces Its Descent from William Des Molines, 80 Named from Moulins, a Town of Bourbounois, in France, Who I 218 LANCASTgU OUT-TOWNSHIPS. The Molyneux Fam1:1y traces its descent from William des Molines, 80 named from Moulins,, a town of Bourbounois, in France, who is mentioned in the Norman Chronicles, prior to the Conquest, as a man of noble origin, held in high esteem by Duke William. His name stands the eighteenth in order in the Roll of Battle Abbey. Soon after the Conquest he acquired, by gift of Roger de Poictou, the lordship of Sefton Thornton and Kerden. By the marriage of his grandson Adam with Annota, the daughter and heiress of Benedict Garnet, lord of Speke, this manor also became the property of the family. Adam de Mulynew gave lands to the Abbey of Cockersand, under the seal of the cross moline. He had two sons, Robert and Gilbert, the eldest of whom marrying Beatrice, daughter and heiress of Robert de Villiers, first lord of Crosby, obtained possession of that lordship. His eldest son, Richard, married Edith, daughter of Almeric Pincerna, of Warrington, and had issue two sons, Adam and Robert. Adam, the eldest son, succeeded at Sefton, and held a forestership in Lancashire, in 1228, and was in commission for the perambulation of forests. He married Lattice de Brinley, and had two sons, William and Roger. The former, Sir William de Molineus, married Margaret, daughter of Sir Alan de Thorneton. His grandson, Sir William, was dubbed a knight banneret in Gascony by Edmund Crouchback, Earl of Lancaster, in 1289. His grandson, Sir William, of Sefton and Little Crosby, married Joan, daughter and heiress of Jordan Ellel, and grand-daughter of Thomas de­ Twenge, forester of Wyresdale. Their son, Sir William, was made a knight banneret by the Black Prince, in 1367, under whom he distinguished himself at the Battle of Navaret. He married Jane, daughter and co-heiress of Sir Robert Holand, and had one son, Sir Richard Molyneux, who succeeded him, and was appointed High Sheriff of Lancashire for life. Sir Richard Molyneux, his son, distinguished himself at the Battle of Agincourt, and obtained the­ , honour of knighthood. .His son, Sir Richard Molyneux, of Sefton, married Elizabeth, sister of Thomas Stanley, Earl of Derby, and had two sons and three­ daughters. The eldest son, Sir Thomas, was in arms for Edward IV., under Richard, Duke of Gloucester, and was created a knight banneret. He married Anne, daughter of Sir Thomas Dutton, of Dutton-in-Cheshire, and died in 1491, leaving two sons and two daughters. Sir William, his son, distinguished himself on Flodden Field in 1513, and took, with his own hands, two standard~ from the Scots. He died in 1546, and was succeeded by his son, Sir Richard, who was knighted at the coronation of Queen Mary, and was sheriff of the­ county in 1566. His son, Sir Richard, was knighted by Queen Elizabeth.. and was the second to be elevated to the dignity of baronet in 1611, when that order was instituted. He married Frances, daughter of Sir Gilbert Garard,. and had issue, Richard, who succeeded him, and five other sons and seven daughters. Sir Richard, the second baronet, was advanced to the peerage of Ireland in 1628, as Viscount Molyneux of Maryborough. He married Mary, daughter and co-heiress of Sir Thomas Caryll, and had four sons and two daughters. Richard, the second Viscount, espoused the cause of Charles I., and with his brother, Caryl, raised two regiments of horse and foot. Richard died without issue, and was succeeded by his brother, Caryl, who was outlawed by Parliament, but at length by interest and the payment of an excessive fine, he was allowed to take possession of his estates. He died in 1698, leaving. three sons and five daughters. William, the fourth Viscount, married Bridget, daughter and heiress of Robert Lucy, Esq., of Charlcote, Warwickshire, and had issue, seven sons and five daughters. He was succeeded by his son, Richard, the fifth Viscount, who was married to Mary, eldest daughter of Francis, Lord Brudenell, and had a son, who died in 1706, and two daughters. Caryl, his brother, succeeded him, and left three sons, who each in turn came­ into the estates. Richard, as seventh Viscount, but who, being a priest, relinquished the estate to his brother, William, the eighth Viscount, who,. dying unmarried, the estates passed to the third brother, Thomas, who ·left a son, Charles William, the ninth Viscount, ten years of age, and later created Earl of Sefton of the peerage of Ireland, 1771, and married Isabella Stanhope,..
Recommended publications
  • Accounts of the Constables of Bristol Castle
    BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY'S PUBLICATIONS General Editor: PROFESSOR PATRICK MCGRATH, M.A., Assistant General Editor: MISS ELIZABETH RALPH, M .A., F.S.A. VOL. XXXIV ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN 1HE THIRTEENTH AND EARLY FOURTEENTH CENTURIES ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN THE THIR1EENTH AND EARLY FOUR1EENTH CENTURIES EDITED BY MARGARET SHARP Printed for the BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 1982 ISSN 0305-8730 © Margaret Sharp Produced for the Society by A1an Sutton Publishing Limited, Gloucester Printed in Great Britain by Redwood Burn Limited Trowbridge CONTENTS Page Abbreviations VI Preface XI Introduction Xlll Pandulf- 1221-24 1 Ralph de Wiliton - 1224-25 5 Burgesses of Bristol - 1224-25 8 Peter de la Mare - 1282-84 10 Peter de la Mare - 1289-91 22 Nicholas Fermbaud - 1294-96 28 Nicholas Fermbaud- 1300-1303 47 Appendix 1 - Lists of Lords of Castle 69 Appendix 2 - Lists of Constables 77 Appendix 3 - Dating 94 Bibliography 97 Index 111 ABBREVIATIONS Abbrev. Plac. Placitorum in domo Capitulari Westmon­ asteriensi asservatorum abbrevatio ... Ed. W. Dlingworth. Rec. Comm. London, 1811. Ann. Mon. Annales monastici Ed. H.R. Luard. 5v. (R S xxxvi) London, 1864-69. BBC British Borough Charters, 1216-1307. Ed. A. Ballard and J. Tait. 3v. Cambridge 1913-43. BOAS Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society Transactions (Author's name and the volume number quoted. Full details in bibliography). BIHR Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. BM British Museum - Now British Library. Book of Fees Liber Feodorum: the Book of Fees com­ monly called Testa de Nevill 3v. HMSO 1920-31. Book of Seals Sir Christopher Hatton's Book of Seals Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree 8/02 Large
    Pepin I Lord of Brabant Mayor unknown King LouisVII of Eleanor of Aquitaine Kenneth I King of of the Palace France Scots BEF 844 (1122 – 1204) of Austrasia d. 647 b.1120-1180 Hermangarde Hugh “The Black” Adelaide son of Louis VI of Also the wife of Henry II Robert I King of France Manasses de Vergi b. ? d. 920 Duke of Burgundy of Burgundy France and Adélaide unknown spouse Father: Boso of Burgundy Ermangarde of Thouars Ansegus Lord of Brabant Adelheid, Princess of France 882-921 father: Thierry II Count of Chaunois Mother: Trungard Princess of the West 884- Giselbert Count and Orleans Begga of of Darnau Margrave of Scheldt 830- 892 King Philip II of Constantine I King of Scots d. 685 Brabant Hildebrante /Liegarde Giselbert of Chalon Ermandgarde of France Herbert II Count de Vermandois 884-943 Lothair I King of Italy Emperor 865- ? b.1165-1223 Princess of France 895- 931 Duke of Burgundy Burgundy Hersent Princess of France Regnier I Duke of Lorraine of the West 795- 855 unknown spouse Roscille de Loches de Willandri Father: Herbert I Count of Senlis Count of Hainaut Hellentrude Pepin II “the Fat” Elfide 654-?/ 890- 956 908- ? Father: Charles II of Moselle 830- ? Father: Louis I The Pious Emperor of 874-? Mayor of the Palace “The Bald” Emperor of the West 850- 916 France Isabelle of Hainaut or Alpais - Mother: Adelaide of Herestal concubine 1170-1190 Donald II King of Scots b.631 d. 714 Fulk I “The Red” of Anjou King of Jerusalem 870- 942 Giselbert Duke Gerberga of Alfonso VIII, king of Castile unknown spouse Heribert “Nuestra” Charles Martel “The Hammer King” of the Gerberga Princess of Lorraine Saxony Mechtilde Saint of 1155-1214 “Count of Laon” Robert de Vermandois Adelaide of Albert “The Pious” 890- 939 925- 984 Ringleheim King Louis VIII of France Franks / Mayor of the palaces of Chrotrud of Gerberga of Gatinais 913- 960 of Lorraine Count of Troyes Burgundy Count of Vermandois 935-? Eleanor of England b.1162-1214 b.1187-1226 Austrasia, Neustria and Burgundy d.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} the End of the House of Lancaster by R.L
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The End of the House of Lancaster by R.L. Storey House of Lancaster. (lăng`kəstər) , royal family of England. The line was founded by the second son of Henry III, Edmund Crouchback, 1245–96, who was created earl of Lancaster in 1267. Earlier (1254) the prince had been made titular king of Sicily when the pope offered that crown to Henry III in order to keep Sicily and the Holy Roman Empire separated. However, the English barons refused financial support for the Sicilian wars, and the title was withdrawn (1258). Later Edmund fought for his brother, Edward I, in Wales and Gascony. His nickname "Crouchback," or crossed back, refers only to the fact that he went on crusade to Palestine in 1271 and, hence, was entitled to wear the cross. Edmund's son Thomas, earl of Lancaster, 1277?–1322, led the baronial opposition to his cousin Edward II Edward II, 1284–1327, king of England (1307–27), son of Edward I and Eleanor of Castile, called Edward of Carnarvon for his birthplace in Wales. The Influence of Gaveston . Click the link for more information. He was one of the lords ordainers and from 1314 to 1318 was virtual ruler of England. He tried unsuccessfully to drive the Despensers (see Despenser, Hugh le Despenser, Hugh le , d. 1265, chief justiciar of England. He joined the barons in their struggle against Henry III and received various offices, becoming chief justiciar in 1260. He lost this office in 1261 but was restored to it in 1263. Click the link for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Finalthesis Weber Pdf.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES FRACTURED POLITICS: DIPLOMACY, MARRIAGE, AND THE LAST PHASE OF THE HUNDRED YEARS WAR ARIEL WEBER SPRING 2014 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Medieval Studies with honors in Medieval Studies Reviewed and approved* by the following: Benjamin T. Hudson Professor of History and Medieval Studies Thesis Supervisor/Honors Adviser Robert Edwards Professor of English and Comparative Literature Thesis Reader * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT The beginning of the Hundred Years War came about from relentless conflict between France and England, with roots that can be traced the whole way to the 11th century, following the Norman invasion of England. These periods of engagement were the result of English nobles both living in and possessing land in northwest France. In their efforts to prevent further bloodshed, the monarchs began to engage in marriage diplomacy; by sending a young princess to a rival country, the hope would be that her native people would be unwilling to wage war on a royal family that carried their own blood. While this method temporarily succeeded, the tradition would create serious issues of inheritance, and the beginning of the last phase of the Hundred Years War, and the last act of success on the part of the English, the Treaty of Troyes, is the culmination of the efforts of the French kings of the early 14th century to pacify their English neighbors, cousins, and nephews. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Plantagenet Claim to France...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alaris Capture Pro Software
    The Red Rose of Lancaster? JOHN ASHDOWN—HILL In the fifteenth century the rival houses of Lancaster and York fought the ‘Wars of the Roses’ for possession of the crown. When, in 1485, the new Tudor monarch, Henry VII, brought these wars to an end, he united, by his mam'age to Elizabeth of York, the red rose of Lancaster and the white rose of York, to create a new emblem and a new dynasty. Thus was born the Tudor rose. So might run a popular account, and botanists, searching through the lists of medieval rose cultivars, have even proposed identifications of the red rose of Lancaster with Rosa Gallica and the white rose of York with Rosa Alba, while the bi-coloured Tudor rose is linked to the naturally occurring variegated sport of Rosa Gallica known as ‘Rosa Mundi’ (Rosa Gallica versicolor), or alternatively, to the rather paler Rosa Damascena versicolor. It should, perhaps, be observed that Rosa Gallica, while somewhat variable in colour. is more likely to be a shade of pink than bright red, and Rosa Alba, while generally white in colour, also occurs in shades of pink, so that in nature the colour~distinction between the two roses is not always clear. ‘Rosa Mundi’ is also strictly speaking variegated in two shades of pink, rather than being literally red and white.‘ The label ‘Wars of the Roses’was a late invention, first employed only in 1829, by Sir Walter Scott, in his romantic novel Anne of Geierstein.2 The story of the rose emblems might appear on casual inspection to be well-founded, for we find ample evidence of Tudor roses bespattering Tudor coinage and royal architecture, for example, at Hampton Court, the Henry VII chapel at Westminster, and at Cambridge, on the gates of Christ’s and St John’s Colleges, and in King’s College chapel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crouchbank Legend Revisted T.P.J
    The Crouchbank Legend Revisted T.P.J. EDLIN With great interest I read John Ashdown-Hill’s stimulating article on the Lancastrian claim to the throne and Henry IV’s use of his descent from Edmund Crouchback, Earl of Lancaster and younger son of Henry III, to formulate a claim to the throne based on the legend that Edmund had in fact been the elder brother of Edward I. This brought to mind several additional thoughts which are set out here in the manner of an augmentation rather than a refutation. First, I discuss recent work which has advanced the claims of John Hardyng’s Chronicle as a source for the background to Henry IV’s usurpation and his use of the ‘Crouchback legend’, and which suggests that there was a systematic and ambitious plan to hijack chronicle evidence in Henry’s favour — a plan which failed, but may ultimately have helped to perpetuate a stubborn if ill-defined remnant of the Crouchback myth. Secondly, the poem Richard the Redeless will be considered, and the possibility that its guardedly Lancastrian perspective hints at the general currency of ideas about Henry’s legitimacy — and, at the same time, Richard II’s illegitimacy — as king. There are, in conclusion, some further thoughts on the differing interpretations of the meaning of Henry’s claim that he was taking the throne as the legitimate heir, ‘of the right line of the blood’ in descent from Henry III. It seems to me that the ‘contemporary tradition that ([Henry III’s son) Edmund was born before his brother Edward’ cited by John Ashdown-Hill refers to the life-time of John of Gaunt.2 Such a promotion (or even invention) of every possible (or impossible) right or claim within Gaunt’s immediate family was entirely consistent with his character and career.
    [Show full text]
  • I Some General Points Section I
    -- SOME QUERIES ON HISTORICAL DETAIL A Report on World Without End a novel by Ken Follett, first draft Commissioned from Geoffrey Hindley for 31 I 07 I 06 Submitted by email attachment 01 I 08 I 06 The Report has rwo sections I Some general points II Points of detail noted by page numbered references Section I : Some general points: -A] ·dukes' etc Ken, a North Walian friend tells me that the sons of Cymru refer among themselves to our lot as Saes6n nevertheless, to the best of my knowledge there never was an archbishop of Monmouth p. 505, (though there was an archbishop of Lichfield in the late 700s!). I suppose the archbishop can be granted on the grounds of poetic licence but a duke of Monmouth (e.g. p. 34 7) does have me a little worried as a medievalist and not by the anachronistic pre-echo of the title of Charles II's bastard. On a simple fact of historical accuracy, I should point out that whereas the title was known on the continent - duke ofNormandy, duke of Saxony, duke of Brittany etc - up to 1337 the title of' 'duke' was unknown among English aristocratic nomenclature. The first award was to Edward III's eldest son (the Black Prince) as 'duke' of Cornwall (hitherto the duchy had been an earldom). The second ducal title was to Henry Grosmont elevated as 'Duke of Lancaster' in 1361. He too was of royal blood being in the direct male descent from Henry III's son Edmund Crouchback. His father the second earl of course lost his head after his defeat at the battle of Boroughbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Grosmont
    GWENT LOCAL HISTORY (Formerly Presenting Monmouthshire) - Number 97 On many occasions Local History cannot be meaningful in a purely 'local' context. An event or process identified in a particular place may be part of a much wider perspective that the local historian must be aware of in order to give his work its proper focus. The Battle of Grosmont was a turning-point in the Glyndwr Rebellion that had covered the length and breadth of Wales and the borders in the early years of the fifteenth century. Secretary: Jenny Render Editor: Tony Hopkins Gwent Record Office Autumn 2004 THE BATTLE OF GROSMONT, 1405: A reinterpretation by Nick Thomas-Symonds (researched by Gareth McCann) Introduction Owain Glyndwr was declared Prince of Wales on 16 September 1400 at his own manor. The apparent pretext was a disagreement with his neighbour, Lord Grey of Ruthin, over either a deliberately delayed summons for Glyndwr to accompany the king on his expedition to Scotland or a local boundary dispute. For Rees Davies, 'this was a premeditated act based on long-festering grievances and an attachment to the ideology of an independent Wales governed by its own native, legitimate ruler.'2 Indeed, from this apparently minor event, Wales was to become a region in revolt. The Battle of Grosmont is one of the Anglo-Welsh battles of this time. It occurred almost exactly half-way through the 'revolt' period of 1400-1409, in March 1405. The significance of the Battle of Grosmont can be located in the context of the Glyndwr revolt, or in terms of providing a brief historical window into the early character of Prince Henry of Monmouth, later Henry V (r.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Nature and the Identity of the Constitution During the Minority Of
    The Nature and the Identity of the Constitution during the Minority of Henry III (1216-1227) Submitted by Stephen Michael Gates to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Masters by Research in Law in June 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract This thesis investigates the nature of the thirteenth-century constitution by focusing on the minority of Henry III. It is argued that Henry’s succession to the throne was a demonstration of the complicated interaction between hereditary right, designation, and election. It is argued that the distribution of power within the government was, for the most part, ill-defined and varied throughout the minority’s course. It is also argued that there was a fundamental uncertainty about when the minority would end and what role Henry himself would play during the minority. Taken together, it is argued, these demonstrate that Henry’s minority was more of a political settlement than a constitutional settlement. This does not mean that England had no constitution during the thirteenth century but merely that it was more sensitive to the political dynamics of the time than perhaps modern constitutions are and that, compared to modern constitutions, it was much less well defined and lacking a clear unified philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Kenilworth Castle 12Th Century
    THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 12TH CENTURY - When and why people first created the site Kenilworth Castle was founded in the early 1120s by Geoffrey de Clinton, Lord Chamberlain and treasurer to Henry I Clinton was a local rival to Roger de Beaumont, the Earl of Warwick and owner of the neighbouring Warwick Castle, and the king made Clinton the sheriff in Warwickshire to act as a counterbalance to Beaumont's power. Henry I’s son had died and so he needed to show that he was powerful even though he did not have an heir The castle's original form is uncertain. It has been suggested that it consisted of a motte, an earthen mound surmounted by wooden buildings; however, the stone great tower may have been part of the original design. Henry II (Henry I’s grandson)succeeded to the throne at the end of a Civil war that lasted from 1135 to 1154 but during the revolt of 1173–74 he faced a significant uprising led by his son, Henry, backed by the French crown. The conflict spread across England and Kenilworth was garrisoned by Henry II's forces; By this point Kenilworth Castle consisted of the great keep, the inner bailey wall, a basic causeway across the smaller lake that preceded the creation of the Great Mere, and the local chase for hunting. De Clinton’s Keep. Windows were added much later, these would have been arrow slits and fishtail arrow slits in the original keep. THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 13TH CENTURY – King John - Henry's successor, Richard I, paid relatively little attention to Kenilworth, but under King John significant building resumed at the castle.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenilworth Castle
    Teachers’ guide to Kenilworth Castle Contents Notes for teachers ..............................................................................................................2 Introduction and Overview ..................................................................................................3 Key Phases ........................................................................................................................5 Kenilworth under the De Clintons, 1120-1174.....................................................................6 Kenilworth and the Crown: 1174 – 1244 .............................................................................8 Kenilworth under Simon de Montfort: 1244-1265 .............................................................. 11 Kenilworth under The House of Lancaster 1266-1361 ...................................................... 12 Kenilworth under John of Gaunt: 1361-1399 .................................................................... 13 Kenilworth under the Lancastrian Kings and the Early Tudors: 1399-1547 ....................... 16 Kenilworth and the Dudley Family: 1547-1588 .................................................................. 18 Kenilworth under the Stuarts .......................................................................................... 266 Kenilworth and the Civil War ........................................................................................... 276 Kenilworth the Farm ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]