Poster Abstracts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poster Abstracts Appendix: Poster Abstracts Abstracts of posters presented at the Third National growing season, overall pesticide reduction (kg. IPM Symposium/Workshop are pre-sented in this active ingredient/acre) for growers using IPM section. These abstracts were first printed in the ranged from 27.1 to 55.3 percent compared to Symposium/Workshop program and are reproduced non-IPM growers. For the same IPM growers, the without change here. Papers are in alphabetical number of spray applications declined 15 and 30.6 order based on the last name of the first author. percent, respectively, depending on the location of the field. Developing and Delivering an IPM Program for Hot Pepper Growers in Mexico. M. Saul Alar- Manipulation of Orchard Ground Covers for con, Hasan A. Bolkan, Robert K. Curtis, and Dennis Enhanced Arthropod Management. Diane G. J. Larsen. Campbell Soup Company, 28605 Country Alston, Department of Biology, Utah State Road 104, Davis, California 95616 University, Logan UT 84322-5305 Traditionally, pests and diseases of hot peppers Diversity and density of species of ground cover (Capsicum spp.) are controlled with protectant plants influenced arthropod abundance and dispersal fungicides and contact insecticides applied on in Utah apple orchards. Certain broadleaf weeds calendar base. Depending on the target organism, present in ground covers increased densities of the number of sprays can range from 5 to 15 per phytophagous and predaceous mites. Mite season per crop. The preventive strategy is abundance and timing of their dispersal from ground successful in protecting yields and quality. Public cover into trees was strongly influenced by presence concerns, however, about pesticide residues is of certain broadleaf weeds and ground cover forcing processors and growers to find alternative management practices, such as frequency and timing control strategies to reduce the use of synthetic of mowing, herbicide application, and cultivation. In pesticides. To help growers make the switch from addition, the ground cover species composition and calendar base pesticide applications to only when biomass were influenced by frequency of mowing. needed, Campbell Soup Company has initiated an Percent horizontal cover of field bindweed a aggressive IPM program for pepper weevil prominent host species for phytophagous mites, was (Anthonomus eugenii Cano), yellowstriped army- greater in plots mowed every two weeks (10-23 worm (Spodoptera ornithogalli Guenee), and virus- percent of total cover) than in plots mowed every transmitting insects. Campbell's Jalapeno IPM three weeks or left unmowed (1 -7 percent) during Program has three interrelated components: cultural July and August. Ambulatory dispersal of practices, monitoring, and treatment. The cultural phytophagous mites into tree canopies was two practices include crop rotation and field sanitation to times greater in plots mowed every two weeks than eliminate weed populations to prevent potential in unmowed plots. The presence of apple migration and infestation of pests and viruses. The rootsuckers on the base of tree trunks increased the second component of the IPM program is abundance and dispersal of phytophagous mites into monitoring and scouting for pest populations. canopies. The type of ground cover in a tart cherry Campbell's IPM specialists provide hands-on orchard was found to influence the pupation success training to growers’ field personnel and help them of western cherry fruit flies in the soil, and the time monitor twice a week for insects and diseases. When and rate of emergence of adults in the spring. it is determined through monitoring and scouting, Ground covers of companion grass and weeds that pest populations have reached the level which resulted in the least pupation. Greatest pupation will cause economic damage, the grower is success and earliest emergence of adults was seen in encouraged to apply selective or biorational bare ground plots. Soil temperature may be a better pesticides such as Bacillus thuringiensis. In 1995 predictor of adult emergence than air temperature. 222 Consideration and Management of Pesticide fertilized with various rates of chicken litter tended Resistance by the U.S. Environmental Protection to suppress numbers of Columbia lance nematode, Agency. Neil Anderson, Tobi L. Colvin-Snyder, but also had a negative impact on cotton yield. Frank Ellis, Paul I. Lewis, Sharlene R. Matten, There was a negative correlation (P=0.05) between Robert I. Rose, Douglas W.S. Sutherland, and Steve seed cotton yield and the amount of rye incorporated Tomasino U.S. Environmental Protection Agency into the soil. However, high rates of chicken litter Office of Pesticide Programs Pesticide Resistance increased (P=0.10) cotton yield and resulted in low Management Workgroup 401 M Street S.W. numbers of this nematode in September. Early Washington, DC 20460 application (December) of litter tended to improve nematode control and enhance yield more than late Pesticide resistance management is a worldwide application (April). Numbers of root-knot problem and is an important aspect of IPM. The nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita, were lowest in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has plots receiving chicken litter, regardless of the date considered the development of pesticide resistance of application. The increased cotton yield in and pesticide resistance management in its response to chicken litter application can be regulatory decisions and believes that it is very attributed to nematode control, since it is unlikely important to implement effective resistance that fall-litter applications affected soil fertility management strategies. How the Agency has during the growing season. Poultry litter also considered pesticide resistance management under enhanced numbers of microbivorous (non-parasitic) the Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act nematodes, indicating increased microbial activity (FIFRA) when making emergency exemption, when this material was added to the soil. Overall, special review and registration decisions plus new results from field as well as greenhouse tests show Agency pesticide resistance management initiatives that these soil amendments were more effective in will be discussed. suppressing population densities of the plant parasites M. Incognita and Paratrichodorus minor Management of Plant-parasitic Nematodes in than H. columbus and Rotylenchulus reniformis. Cotton Production Systems with Poultry Litter and Winter Rye. K.R. Barker', S.R Koenning', RL. Spatial Analysis Technology Applied to the Mikkelsen233 , K. L. Edmisten , D. T.Bowman , and Regional Assessment of Plant Pests and Diseases. D.E. Morrison4 , 'Departments of Plant Pathology, John H. Barnes, USDA/CSREES, Washington DC; 23Soil Science, and Crop Science, North Carolina Hasan Bolkan and Saul Alarcon, Campbell Corp., State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, and 4North Davis. CA.; Merritt Nelson, David Byrne, and Tom Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, Scotland Orum, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ County 231 E. Cronly St., Laurinburg, NC 28383 We have been assessing the benefits of analyzing Cultural practices often are neglected as an option plant disease and pest severity on a regional scale for nematode management in cotton. Use of animal using the tools that are also being applied to wastes and other organic amendments or green precision farming, such as geographic information manure crops such as a winter rye crop have and global positioning systems (GIS and GPS). promise for controlling many plant-parasitic These two technologies are extremely useful in nematodes. Field experiments were initiated in developing a computer map based record of the North Carolina to evaluate the influence of rates and location of disease and pest outbreaks. In addition, dates of poultry litter application and (or) a winter these data may be analyzed spatially using rye cover crop on Columbia lance nematode, geostatistics to show how and where regional Hoplolaimus columbus, and cotton yield. Fertility patterns vary. When the concepts of "Landscape levels for all plots were adjusted to those Ecology" are applied to the heterogeneous recommended by a soil test. A rye cover crop landscapes that are characteristic of most plant 223 dominated ecosystems, including agroecosystems 3.6F) for control of white mold (Sclerotium rolfsii) useful conclusions regarding cropping pattern and limb rot (Rhizoctonia solani) into the spray influences on the severity of diseases and pests may program. Dry land and irrigated tests were done. be generated and used in the design of management Three AU-Pnut programs were generated using the programs. This approach to the assessment of regional five day precipitation forecast and disease and pest risk requires that all data be precipitation measured on-site, 1.6 km off-site or associated with map coordinates. Inexpensive hand- 12.9 km off-site from both tests. The performance held GPS units now available make this possible. of the AU-Pnut spray programs was compared with Such data can be entered into the GIS database for a standard 14-day spray schedule. Half of the plots geostatistical and other spatial analysis procedures. in each test were sprayed with chlorothalonil (Bravo Outcomes of this approach to assessing plant 720F) at the recommended rate (1.0 kg a.i./ha) and disease and pests include an easily accessible record half were sprayed with a chloro-thalonil-tebucon- of disease occurrence, identification of recurring azole tank mix at 0.34 and 0.1 kg a.i./ha,
Recommended publications
  • EPPO Reporting Service
    ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN ET MEDITERRANEENNE PLANT PROTECTION POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES ORGANIZATION EPPO Reporting Service NO. 1 PARIS, 2021-01 General 2021/001 New data on quarantine pests and pests of the EPPO Alert List 2021/002 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in the Russian Federation 2021/003 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in Tajikistan 2021/004 Update on the situation of quarantine pests in Uzbekistan 2021/005 New and revised dynamic EPPO datasheets are available in the EPPO Global Database Pests 2021/006 Anoplophora glabripennis eradicated from Austria 2021/007 Popillia japonica is absent from Germany 2021/008 First report of Scirtothrips aurantii in Spain 2021/009 Agrilus planipennis found in Saint Petersburg, Russia 2021/010 First report of Spodoptera frugiperda in Syria 2021/011 Spodoptera frugiperda found in New South Wales, Australia 2021/012 Spodoptera ornithogalli (Lepidoptera Noctuidae - yellow-striped armyworm): addition to the EPPO Alert List 2021/013 First report of Xylosandrus compactus in mainland Spain 2021/014 First report of Eotetranychus lewisi in mainland Portugal 2021/015 First report of Meloidogyne chitwoodi in Spain 2021/016 Update on the situation of the potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida in Portugal Diseases 2021/017 First report of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in Belgium 2021/018 Update on the situation of tomato brown rugose fruit virus in Spain 2021/019 Update on the situation of Acidovorax citrulli in Greece with findings
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Armyworms in Pastures and Hayfields
    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Arkansas System FSA7083 Managing Armyworms in Pastures and Hayfields Kelly Loftin Introduction (Spodoptera ornithogalli) and beet Associate Professor and armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) may Extension Entomologist Two species of armyworms can be attack forages but seldom reach pest significant pests of Arkansas forage status on Arkansas forage. and pasture production. Both species Gus Lorenz belong in the family Noctuidae along Damage from true armyworm Professor - Extension with other garden and agronomic and fall armyworm can seem to Entomologist and IPM pests such as cutworms, bollworms appear overnight. Although the Coordinator and budworms. damage might appear overnight, larvae have likely been feeding for a Ricky Corder In Arkansas, the “true” armyworm week or more before they or their (Pseudaletia unipuncta) is more of a damage appear. This is because when Program Associate ­ spring pest of cool-season grasses the worms are small (early instars) Entomology and tall fescue. The fall armyworm they do not eat much. It is not until (FAW) (Spodoptera frugiperda) is the fifth and sixth instar that the a summer/fall pest primarily of caterpillars begin consuming large bermuda grass, but it can also damage amounts of forage (Figure 1). In addi­ fall-seeded, newly established winter tion, large armyworms may move annuals, fescue and orchardgrass. into an uninfested field (or area of a field) adjacent to a field that was just In southern Arkansas, we can defoliated. Because armyworms are expect to see fall armyworm damage so destructive and compete with live- in bermudagrass as early as July.
    [Show full text]
  • Life-History Parameters of Encarsia Formosa, Eretmocerus Eremicus and E
    Eur. J. Entomol. 101: 83–94, 2004 ISSN 1210-5759 Life-history parameters of Encarsia formosa, Eretmocerus eremicus and E. mundus, aphelinid parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) YU TONG QIU, JOOP C. VAN LENTEREN, YVONNE C. DROST and CONNIE J.A.M. POSTHUMA-DOODEMAN Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University; P.O.Box 8031, 6700 EH Wageningen, The Netherlands e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Key words. Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae, Homoptera, Aleyrodidae, whiteflies, Encarsia formosa, Eretmocerus eremicus, Eretmocerus mundus, biological control, life history, longevity, development time Abstract. Life-history parameters (juvenile development time, adult longevity, host instar preference and rate of parasitism) of four parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (two strains of Encarsia formosa (D and B), Eretmocerus eremicus and Eretmocerus mundus) were studied in the laboratory. At 15°C juvenile development time was the shortest for E. formosa B (48 days), longest for E. ere- micus (79.3 days) and intermediate for E. formosa D (62.8 days) and E. mundus (64 days) at 15°C. With increase in temperature, development time decreased to around 14 days for all species/strains at 32°C. The lower developmental threshold for development was 11.5, 8.1, 13.0 and 11.5°C for E. formosa D, E. formosa B, E. eremicus and E. mundus, respectively. E. formosa D and B, and E. mundus all appeared to prefer to parasitize 3rd instar nymphs. The presence of hosts shortened adult longevity in most of the para- sitoids, with the exception of E. formosa B, which lived longer than other species/strains irrespective of the presence of hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • What's "Up"? a Critical Loolc at the Basic Terms of Canopy Biology^
    BIOTROPICA 32(4a): 569-596 2000 REVIEW AND VIEWPOINT What's "Up"? A Critical Loolc at the Basic Terms of Canopy Biology^ Mark W. Moffett Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 3101 Valley Life Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The lack of recent critiques about terminology has led to the frequent misuse or confusingly varied use of the words that are more or less specific to the field of terrestrial canopy biology. I provide definitions for ca 170 terms and subterms, with translations into four languages. Rather than limit coverage to tree crowns, I define canopy biology as the study of life within any aboveground parts of all plant communities, temperate and tropical. This broadened perspective enables ecologists to consider the entire range of challenges faced by organisms living in aboveground plant life, from just above the rhizosphere to the outer limits of plant growth into the atmosphere. Further, this redefinition may reduce the potential for anthropocentric biases in interpreting life on trees or other plants; encourage the use of alternative ecosystems for hypotheses that may be difficult to address in treetops; and promote more general conceptual thinking about life on vegetation, most notably the importance of scaling in ecology. Among the salient points in terminology: the concept of "stratification" has been criticized in part because strata have been defined many ways, but a flexible application of the word is central to its utility; the source of nutrients is pivotal in distinguishing
    [Show full text]
  • Control Biológico De Insectos: Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada Un Enfoque Agroecológico
    Control biológico de insectos: Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada un enfoque agroecológico Control biológico de insectos: un enfoque agroecológico Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada Ciencia y Tecnología Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Ciencia y Tecnología © Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada © Editorial Universidad de Antioquia ISBN: 978-958-714-186-3 Primera edición: septiembre de 2008 Diseño de cubierta: Verónica Moreno Cardona Corrección de texto e indización: Miriam Velásquez Velásquez Elaboración de material gráfico: Ana Cecilia Galvis Martínez y Alejandro Henao Salazar Diagramación: Luz Elena Ochoa Vélez Coordinación editorial: Larissa Molano Osorio Impresión y terminación: Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia Impreso y hecho en Colombia / Printed and made in Colombia Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial, por cualquier medio o con cualquier propósito, sin autorización escrita de la Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia Teléfono: (574) 219 50 10. Telefax: (574) 219 50 12 E-mail: [email protected] Sitio web: http://www.editorialudea.com Apartado 1226. Medellín. Colombia Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia Teléfono: (574) 219 53 30. Telefax: (574) 219 53 31 El contenido de la obra corresponde al derecho de expresión del autor y no compromete el pensamiento institucional de la Universidad de Antioquia ni desata su responsabilidad frente a terceros. El autor asume la responsabilidad por los derechos de autor y conexos contenidos en la obra, así como por la eventual información sensible publicada en ella. Nicholls Estrada, Clara Inés Control biológico de insectos : un enfoque agroecológico / Clara Inés Nicholls Estrada. -- Medellín : Editorial Universidad de Antioquia, 2008. 282 p. ; 24 cm. -- (Colección ciencia y tecnología) Incluye glosario. Incluye bibliografía e índices.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Spiny Whitefly, Aleurocanthus Spiniferus (Quaintance) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)1 Jamba Gyeltshen, Amanda Hodges, and Greg S
    EENY341 Orange Spiny Whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance) (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)1 Jamba Gyeltshen, Amanda Hodges, and Greg S. Hodges2 Introduction Africa (Van den Berg et al. 1990). More recently, orange spiny whitefly was reported from Italy (2008), Croatia Orange spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus Quaintance, (2012), and Montenegro (2013) (Radonjic et al. 2014). is a native pest of citrus in tropical Asia. In the early 1920s, Established populations of orange spiny whitefly are not yet pest outbreak infestation levels caused Japan to begin a known to occur in the continental US. biological control program. Primarily, orange spiny whitefly affects host plants by sucking the sap but it also causes indirect damage by producing honeydew and subsequently Description and Life History promoting the growth of sooty mold. Sooty mold is a Whiteflies have six developmental stages: egg, crawler (1st black fungus that grows on honeydew. Heavy infestations instar), two sessile nymphal instars (2nd and 3rd instars), of orange spiny whitefly, or other honeydew-producing the pupa (4th instar), and adult. Identification of the insects such as scales, mealybugs, aphids, and other whitefly Aleyrodidae is largely based upon characters found in the species, can cause sooty mold to completely cover the leaf pupal (4th instar) stage. The duration of the life cycle and surface and negatively affect photosynthesis. the number of generations per year are greatly influenced by the prevailing climate. A mild temperature with high Distribution relative humidity provides ideal conditions for growth and development. About four generations per year have The orange spiny whitefly has spread to Africa, Australia, been recorded in Japan (Kuwana et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rice-Cotton Cutworm Spodoptera Litura
    The rice-cotton cutworm Spodoptera litura Photo: Natasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org, #5190079 1 The Rice-cotton Cutworm • Generalist plant-feeding moth • Not yet established in the U.S. • Potentially high economic impact • Also known as: tobacco cutworm, cotton leafworm, cluster caterpillar, oriental leafworm moth and tropical armyworm Photo: M. Shepard, G. R.Carner, and P.A.C. Ooi, Insects & their Natural Enemies Associated with Vegetables & Soybean in Southeast Asia, Bugwood.org, #5368051 The rice-cotton cutworm (Spodoptera litura) is a polyphagous (feeds on many foods) pest of over 100 different host plants. It has not established in the U.S. (yet), but it is believed that it would cause a large economic impact. At the very least, pest establishment could result in increased insecticide use. It is also known as cluster caterpillar, common cutworm, cotton leafworm, tobacco cutworm, tobacco caterpillar, oriental leafworm moth, rice cutworm, and tropical armyworm. These common names derive from the different geographical regions in which this pest is found and the host plants on which they are found. 2 Hosts include: • Citrus • Crucifers • Soybeans • Onions • Potatoes • Sugarbeets • Sweet potatoes oranges • Cotton • Cauliflower • Apple cotton • Strawberry • Rice • Sugarcane • Roses • Peanuts • Tomato sugar cane tomatoes All photos licensed by Adobe Stock Photos This pest is a generalist on over 100 hosts. It can attack all citrus and their hybrids (Citrus spp.) and all crucifers (Brassica spp.). The host list includes (but is not limited to): Abelmoschus esculentus (okra) Allium cepa (onion) Begonia spp. Beta vulgaris var. saccharifera (sugarbeet) Cicer arietinum (chickpea) Coffea sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to Genera of Tingidae in Florida
    Insect Classification Spring 2003 Amanda Bisson, Sarah Clark, Matt Lehnert, and Rick Stein Key to TINGIDAE of Florida Lace Bugs Tingidae is a rather large family in the order Heteroptera containing approximately 250 genera and 2000 species worldwide. All are phytophagous (feeding on plants) and are host specific. In fact, despite the detailed key provided here, one of the most important pieces of information necessary for tingid identification is the name of the host plant. Thirty-nine species have been reported in Florida; however, only seven of those are commonly encountered. The most common species that occur in Florida include the azalea lace bug (Stephanitis pyrioides), the hawthorn lace bug (Corythucha cydoniae), the lantana lace bug (Teleonemia scrupulosa) and the sycamore lace bug (Corythucha ciliata). Other important species include the avocado lace bug (Pseudacysta perseae), the fringetree lace bug (Leptoypha mutica), and the oak lace bug (Corythucha floridana). Physical identification of tingids is done primarily through examination of the head, pronotum and hemelytra. Adult lace bugs get their name from the lace-like appearance of their dorsum. This is created by a reticulate network of ridges on the pronotum and hemelytra that divides the area into a series of cells of variable size and shape. Many tingids also bear a strongly developed bucculae. These are ventral flanges on either side of the head that border the rostrum. Other common characteristics of tingids include two-segmented tarsi and the absence of ocelli. Their antennae are four-segmented, with segments I and II short and thick and segment III usually much longer and more slender.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas SelecVe Pressures on WBC Are Very Different Between These Two Countries
    What is going on with the western bean cutworm in Mexico? Sergio R. Sanchez-Peña1*, Renato Villegas-Luján1, Moisés Felipe-Victoriano1, Ivonne Torres-Acosta2 1 Departamento de Parasitología Agrícola, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, SalQllo, Coahuila, Mexico 2 Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Mante, Tamaulipas, México UAAAN • [email protected] Introduc)on Western bean cutworm (WBC), Striacosta albicosta, is a North American nave and emergent maize pest in Pheromone trapping in Northern Mexico the USA. However, there are onlY two reports of WBC as maize pest in Mexico. We have detected economic Twenty Jackson traps lined with glue and sYntheQc pheromone lure were set up on a 100 km, variable alQtude transect populaons of WBC on landrace maize in southern Coahuila state, Mexico. There is an analogous report going from 800 to 2500 m, from Rinconada, Nuevo Leon, to Huachichil, Coahuila. TheY were set up on late summer. from near Mexico City. Maize is the base of Mexican food. Maize agriculture is different in the USA and Sites are in Figure 4. Huachichil is the site of original collecng of the moths. WBC has been found there on late season Mexico. Bt-transgenic maize, pescide use and other high technologY on large areas prevail in the USA. In corn (October-November) on very ripe ear, i.e. PhYsiological Maturity (R6). Mexico, maize landraces produced on small areas (i.e. 2 acres) and receiving no pescides prevail, with addiQonal areas producing hybrid seed maize. Because growing transgenic maize is prohibited in Mexico, Texas selecve pressures on WBC are very different between these two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 94: Frank & Mccoy Intro. 1 INTRODUCTION to INSECT
    Behavioral Ecology Symposium ’94: Frank & McCoy Intro. 1 INTRODUCTION TO INSECT BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY : THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE BEAUTIFUL: NON-INDIGENOUS SPECIES IN FLORIDA INVASIVE ADVENTIVE INSECTS AND OTHER ORGANISMS IN FLORIDA. J. H. FRANK1 AND E. D. MCCOY2 1Entomology & Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 2Biology Department and Center for Urban Ecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620-5150 ABSTRACT An excessive proportion of adventive (= “non-indigenous”) species in a community has been called “biological pollution.” Proportions of adventive species of fishes, am- phibia, reptiles, birds and mammals in southern Florida range from 16% to more than 42%. In Florida as a whole, the proportion of adventive plants is about 26%, but of in- sects is only about 8%. Almost all of the vertebrates were introduced as captive pets, but escaped or were released into the wild, and established breeding populations; few arrived as immigrants (= “of their own volition”). Almost all of the plants also were in- troduced, a few arrived as immigrants (as contaminants of shipments of seeds or other cargoes). In contrast, only 42 insect species (0.3%) were introduced (all for bio- logical control of pests, including weeds). The remainder (about 946 species, or 7.6%) arrived as undocumented immigrants, some of them as fly-ins, but many as contami- nants of cargoes. Most of the major insect pests of agriculture, horticulture, human- made structures, and the environment, arrived as hitchhikers (contaminants of, and stowaways in, cargoes, especially cargoes of plants). No adventive insect species caus- ing problems in Florida was introduced (deliberately) as far as is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Distribution, Host Associations, and Bionomics Of
    Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research 2014; volume 46:1857 Notes on distribution, host associations, and bionomics of Erythmelus klopomor Triapitsyn (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of lace bugs in Missouri, USA, with particular reference to its primary host Corythucha arcuata (Say) (Hemiptera, Tingidae) B. Puttler,1 W.C. Bailey,1 S.V. Triapitsyn2 1Division of Plant Sciences (Entomology), University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; 2Department of Entomology, Entomology Research Museum, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA apparently overwinters as an adult. Erythmelus klopomor should be Abstract considered as a candidate classical biological control agent against the recently introduced C. arcuata in Bulgaria, northern Italy, Switzerland, The fairyfly Erythmelus klopomor Triapitsyn (Hymenoptera, and Turkey, and also possibly against the well-established invasive C. Mymaridae) is an idiobiont, multivoltine egg parasitoid of lace bugs ciliata in Europe. (Hemiptera, Tingidae). The parasitoid apparently reproduces the- lytokously and at present is only known in the USA from 36 counties in Missouri, two in Illinois, four in Florida and one each in North Introduction Carolina and Maryland. At least a somewhat wider occurrence of the parasitoid is indicated because of the ease by which it has been reared Lace bugs (Hemiptera, Tingidae) are commonly found on a variety from its primary host the oak lace bug, Corythucha arcuata (Say). It of ornamental shrubs, urban and forest trees, and weeds (Johnson & also has been reared in Missouri from the additional hosts C. cydoniae Lyon, 1991; Horn et al., 1979) and at times may warrant control meas- (Fitch), C. marmorata (Uhler), C. pergandei Heidemann, C. ciliata ures if only to enhance esthetics on their respective host plants.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of the Lace Bug Neoplerochila Paliatseasi (Rodrigues, 1981) (Hemiptera: Tingidae) Infesting Cultivated Olive Trees
    Zootaxa 4722 (5): 443–462 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.5.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0183A47A-AA1E-4AAF-8802-54CB9CCDE58C First report of the lace bug Neoplerochila paliatseasi (Rodrigues, 1981) (Hemiptera: Tingidae) infesting cultivated olive trees in South Africa, and its complete mitochondrial sequence JETHRO LANGLEY1, MORGAN CORNWALL1, CHANTÉ POWELL1, CARLO COSTA2, ELLEUNORAH ALLSOPP3, SIMON VAN NOORT4,5, ERIC GUILBERT6 & BARBARA VAN ASCH1 1Department of Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. 2Crop Development Division, Infruitec Campus, Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X5013, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa. 3Agricultural Research Council, Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa. 4Research and Exhibitions Department, Iziko South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town 8000, South Africa. 5Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. 6Département Adaptation du Vivant, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7179, CP50, 45 Rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. Barbara van Asch - [email protected] ABSTRACT Olive lace bugs are small phytophagous Hemipteran insects known to cause agricultural losses in olive production in South Africa. Plerochila australis (Distant, 1904) has been reported as the species responsible for damage to olive trees; however, the diversity of olive lace bug species in the region has lacked attention. Adult olive lace bugs were collected incidentally from wild and cultivated olive trees in the Western Cape Province, and identified as P. australis and Neoplerochila paliatseasi (Rodrigues, 1981).
    [Show full text]