Highway Bridges of Colorado Multiple Property Documentation Form

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highway Bridges of Colorado Multiple Property Documentation Form NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. New Submission XX Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Highway Bridges in Colorado B. Associated Historic Contexts The Historical and Technological Evolution of Colorado’s Bridges 1880 - 1958 Early Bridge Construction by the Railroads and Local Government Early Bridge Construction by the State Early Transcontinental Highways Depression-Era Bridge Construction Interstate Highways C. Form Prepared by name/title Clayton B. Fraser, Principal organization Fraserdesign date 30 March 2000 street & number 420 South County Road 23E telephone 970-669-7969 city or town Loveland state Colorado zip code 80537 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation. (See continuation sheet for additional comments [ ].) State Historic Preservation Officer Signature and title of certifying official Date Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Colorado Historical Society State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. Signature of the Keeper Date of Action Highway Bridges in Colorado Colorado Name of Multiple Property Listing State Table of Contents for Written Narrative Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheet in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. page number E. Statement of Historic Contexts The Historical and Technological Evolution of Colorado’s Bridges 1880 - 1958 1. Introduction: Bridge Development in America................................................................... 1 2. Early Bridge Construction by the Railroads and Local Government.................................. 7 3. Early Bridge Construction by the State ........................................................................... 21 4. Early Transcontinental Highways.................................................................................... 33 5. Depression-Era Bridge Construction .............................................................................. 40 6. Interstate Highways........................................................................................................ 42 F. Associated Property Types Timber stringer and truss bridges............................................................................................. 62 Concrete slab and girder bridges ............................................................................................. 68 Concrete, stone, and steel arch bridges .................................................................................. 73 Concrete rigid frame bridges.................................................................................................... 83 Steel stringer and girder bridges ............................................................................................. 86 Iron and steel truss bridges...................................................................................................... 92 Glossary................................................................................................................................. 100 G. Geographical Data ............................................................................................................... 116 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods.......................................................... 117 (Discuss the methods used in developing the multiple property listing.) I. Major Bibliographical References....................................................................................... 118 State Historic Preservation Office, other State agency, Federal agency, local government, university, or other, specifying repository.) Primary location of additional data: [ ] State Historic Preservation Office [ ] Other State Agency [ ] Federal Agency [ ] Local Government [ ] University [X] Other Name of repository: Colorado Department of Transportation Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 120 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet section number E page 1 H I G H W A Y B R I D G E S I N C O L O R A D O 1 Introduction: Bridge Development in America Bridges, as integral elements of a developing transportation network, have played a pivotal part in the development of America. Generally the most sophisticated components of any overland transportation system, they are also the most prominent. Not merely gauges of technological advancement in design and construction, bridges reflect the tenets, values, and ambitions of the people who erected them. “There can be little doubt that in many ways the story of bridgebuilding is the story of civilization,” Franklin Roosevelt stated in 1931. “By it we can readily measure an important part of a people’s progress.” While descriptive of the country in general, this was especially true for Colorado, a state in which overland transportation forms a central historical theme. From the earliest wooden spans put up during the first gold boom to the later iron and steel trusses erected on wagon roads and multiple-span urban viaducts for vehicular and tramway use, bridges have facilitated, and in some instances created, settlement across the state. A plethora of bridge forms, variously employing such materials as stone, timber, iron, steel, and concrete, were developed through centuries of empirical usage. By the time America was undergoing initial settlement on the East Coast, most of the principal bridge types and materials had been used or at least experimented with in other countries. What remained over the last two centuries has been a process of refinement revolving principally around the introduction and proliferation of structural metals and concrete as building materials. The first wooden bridges were merely plank structures—the equivalent of a log thrown across the stream. Limited in span to the wooden beam’s length and carrying capacity, they were used for only the shortest crossings. Without proper support, they became unduly strained by bending moment forces, leading to failure: the log broke. An advancement over this was the first significant bridge form in America, the pier bridge, also called the pike-and-beam bridge. Another ancient bridge type, it consisted of timber or log stringers spanning between timber pile bent piers, spaced at intervals of between 10 and 30 feet. In places where loose or shifting sediment proved unsuitable or was too deep for stone foundations, wooden piles were driven into the river to support the roadwork. A variation on the pile design, the crib bridge, used stacked logs for the piers. Timber stringer bridges were used extensively on the East Coast and further inland, as the settlement line moved westward. Consisting of multiple short spans of timber beams resting on pile bents or cribs, timber bridges were impractical across wide, deep rivers, and many were eventually replaced by timber trusses in the late 18th century. Nonetheless, timber stringer bridges continue to be the most commonly built vehicular bridge type, one that continues to be built for minor crossings. The use of stone as a building material was also transferred to America from Europe. Long known for its compressive strength, stone (or more specifically the mortar
Recommended publications
  • Côte D'ivoire
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP ABIDJAN URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Authorized Public Disclosure COUNTRY : CÔTE D’IVOIRE PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Authorized Authoriezd Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure OITC DEPARTMENT December 2016 Translated Document TABLE OF CONTENTS I – STRATEGIC THRUST AND RATIONALE ..................................................................... 1 1.1 Key Development Issues…………………………………………………………… ........ 1 1.2 Project Linkages with Country Strategy and Objectives .................................................... 1 1.3 Rationale for Bank Involvement ......................................................................................... 2 1.4 Aid Coordination ................................................................................................................ 3 II – PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 3 2.1 Project Components ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Technical Solutions Adopted and Alternatives Explored ................................................... 5 2.3 Project Type ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.4 Project Cost and Financing Arrangements ......................................................................... 6 2.5 Project Target Area and Beneficiaries ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203
    / COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 102 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Status of Flood Plain Information Program in Colorado June 1974 Increasing recognition of the importance of Colorado's flood plains is occurring. Colorado Revised Statutes 1963, as amended, Section 149-1-11(4), authorizes the Colorado Water Conservation Board to designate and approve storm or flood water runoff channels and to make such designations available to legis­ lative bodies of local jurisdictions. In addition to assisting local governmental entities in obtaining basic flood plain data, the Board is actively engaged in assisting local governments in developing and adopting effective flood plain ordinances and related land use regulations. The Board has the responsibility of coordinating all flood related studies within the state of Colorado, which includes scheduling the Flood Plain Information Studies conducted by federal agencies, and can provide direct financial assistance for a study within Colorado. The intent is that, with these data outlining the flood plains, local entities can control the use of these flood plains and thereby prevent developments within the paths of future floods. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, have specific authorities for the preparation of detailed flood plain reports. House Bill 1041, relating to the use of land, (Article 7, Chapter 106, CRS 1963, as amended) provides, "Flood­ plains shall be administered so as to minimize significant hazards to public health and safety or to property. Open space activities shall be encouraged in the floodplains." Concerning the designation and use of flood plains, the Board is charged with responsibilities under the Act as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado a Users Guide to the Classification Project
    A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado A Users Guide to the Classification Project September 1, 1999 By Gwen Kittel, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen and John Sanderson Clockwise from top: Conejos River, Conejos County, Populus angustifolia-Picea pungens/Alnus incana Riparian Woodland Flattop Wilderness, Garfield County, Carex aquatilis Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation South Platte River, Logan County, Populus deltoides/Carex lanuginosa Riparian Woodland California Park, Routt County, Salix boothii/Mesic Graminoids Riparian Shrubland Joe Wright Creek, Larimer County, Abies lasiocarpa-Picea engelmannii/Alnus incana Riparian Forest Dolores River, San Miguel County, Forestiera pubescens Riparian Shrubland Center Photo San Luis Valley, Saguache County, Juncus balticus Riparian Herbaceous Vegetation (Photography by Gwen Kittel) 2 Prepared by: Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Bldg. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 [email protected] This report should be cited as follows: Kittel, Gwen, Erika VanWie, Mary Damm, Reneé Rondeau, Steve Kettler, Amy McMullen, and John Sanderson. 1999. A Classification of Riparian Wetland Plant Associations of Colorado: User Guide to the Classification Project. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. 80523 For more information please contact: Colorado Natural Heritage Program, 254 General Service Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523. (970)
    [Show full text]
  • XXXI:4) Robert Montgomery, LADY in the LAKE (1947, 105 Min)
    September 22, 2015 (XXXI:4) Robert Montgomery, LADY IN THE LAKE (1947, 105 min) (The version of this handout on the website has color images and hot urls.) Directed by Robert Montgomery Written by Steve Fisher (screenplay) based on the novel by Raymond Chandler Produced by George Haight Music by David Snell and Maurice Goldman (uncredited) Cinematography by Paul Vogel Film Editing by Gene Ruggiero Art Direction by E. Preston Ames and Cedric Gibbons Special Effects by A. Arnold Gillespie Robert Montgomery ... Phillip Marlowe Audrey Totter ... Adrienne Fromsett Lloyd Nolan ... Lt. DeGarmot Tom Tully ... Capt. Kane Leon Ames ... Derace Kingsby Jayne Meadows ... Mildred Havelend Pink Horse, 1947 Lady in the Lake, 1945 They Were Expendable, Dick Simmons ... Chris Lavery 1941 Here Comes Mr. Jordan, 1939 Fast and Loose, 1938 Three Morris Ankrum ... Eugene Grayson Loves Has Nancy, 1937 Ever Since Eve, 1937 Night Must Fall, Lila Leeds ... Receptionist 1936 Petticoat Fever, 1935 Biography of a Bachelor Girl, 1934 William Roberts ... Artist Riptide, 1933 Night Flight, 1932 Faithless, 1931 The Man in Kathleen Lockhart ... Mrs. Grayson Possession, 1931 Shipmates, 1930 War Nurse, 1930 Our Blushing Ellay Mort ... Chrystal Kingsby Brides, 1930 The Big House, 1929 Their Own Desire, 1929 Three Eddie Acuff ... Ed, the Coroner (uncredited) Live Ghosts, 1929 The Single Standard. Robert Montgomery (director, actor) (b. May 21, 1904 in Steve Fisher (writer, screenplay) (b. August 29, 1912 in Marine Fishkill Landing, New York—d. September 27, 1981, age 77, in City, Michigan—d. March 27, age 67, in Canoga Park, California) Washington Heights, New York) was nominated for two Academy wrote for 98 various stories for film and television including Awards, once in 1942 for Best Actor in a Leading Role for Here Fantasy Island (TV Series, 11 episodes from 1978 - 1981), 1978 Comes Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory | Pages 164-191
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet section number G, H page 156 V E H I C U L A R B R I D G E S I N A R I Z O N A Geographic Data: State of Arizona Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods The Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory, which forms the basis for this Multiple Property Documentation Form [MPDF], is a sequel to an earlier study completed in 1987. The original study employed 1945 as a cut-off date. This study inventories and evaluates all of the pre-1964 vehicular bridges and grade separations currently maintained in ADOT’s Structure Inventory and Appraisal [SI&A] listing. It includes all structures of all struc- tural types in current use on the state, county and city road systems. Additionally it includes bridges on selected federal lands (e.g., National Forests, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base) that have been included in the SI&A list. Generally not included are railroad bridges other than highway underpasses; structures maintained by federal agencies (e.g., National Park Service) other than those included in the SI&A; structures in private ownership; and structures that have been dismantled or permanently closed to vehicular traffic. There are exceptions to this, however, and several abandoned and/or privately owned structures of particular impor- tance have been included at the discretion of the consultant. The bridges included in this Inventory have not been evaluated as parts of larger road structures or historic highway districts, although they are clearly integral parts of larger highway resources.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIDGE INSPECTION and INTERFEROMETRY by JOSEPH E. KRAJEWSKI a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INST
    BRIDGE INSPECTION AND INTERFEROMETRY by JOSEPH E. KRAJEWSKI A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering May 2006 APPROVED: Professor Leonard D. Albano, Advisor ________________________________ Professor Cosme Furlong __________________________________________ Professor Malcolm Ray ____________________________________________ Professor Frederick Hart___________________________________________ ABSTRACT With the majority of bridges in the country aging, over capacity and costly to rehabilitate or replace, it is essential that engineers refine their inspection and evaluation techniques. Over the past 130 years the information gathering techniques and methods used by engineers to inspect bridges have changed little. All of the available methods rely on one technique, visual inspection. In addition, over the past 40 years individual bridge inspectors have gone from being information gathers to being solely responsible for the condition rating of bridges they inspect. The reliance on the visual abilities of a single individual to determine the health of a particular bridge has led to inconsistent and sometimes erroneous results. In an effort to provide bridge inspectors and engineers with more reliable inspection and evaluation techniques, this thesis will detail the case for development of a new inspection tool, and the assembly and use of one new tool called Fringe Interferometry. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to sincerely thank my advisor, Professor Leonard D. Albano, for his encouragement, suggestions, patience and help in writing this thesis. His willingness to let me go beyond the realm of Civil Engineer and into the far away world of Interferometry (where few if any Civil Engineers have been) is something I will never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1
    UPPER REPUBLICAN BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit: Arikaree River Water Quality Impairment: Sulfate 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Arikaree River County: Cheyenne HUC 8: (In Kansas) 10250001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): (In Kansas) 080 (030, 040 and 050) Drainage Area: 37 square miles in Kansas 1725 square miles total above sampling station Main Stem Segment: WQLS: 1 (Arikaree River) starting at the Kansas-Nebraska state line and traveling upstream through northwest Cheyenne County to the Kansas-Colorado state line (Figure 1). Tributaries: All tributaries located in Colorado, segment numbers unknown Horse Creek Sand Creek Gordon Creek Currie Creek Dugout Creek Hell Creek North Fork Arikaree River Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation (C), Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Kansas Segment. Impaired Use: Domestic Water Supply Water Quality Standard: Sulfate: 250 mg/l for Domestic Water Supply (KAR 28-16-28e(c) (3) (A)) 1 (Figure 1) 2. CURRENT WATER QUALITY CONDITION AND DESIRED ENDPOINT Level of Support for Designated Use under 2004 303(d): Not Supporting Domestic Water Supply Monitoring Sites: Station 226 at Haigler, NE. Period of Record Used: 1986-2005 for Station 226 (Figure 2, Table 1) 2 Sulfate Concentration at SC226 900 800 700 600 500 mg/L 400 300 200 100 0 Jul-90 Jul-92 Jul-94 Jul-96 Jul-98 Jul-99 Apr-91 Apr-93 Apr-95 Apr-97 Apr-00 Oct-91 Oct-93 Oct-95 Oct-97 Oct-00 Jun-91 Jun-93 Jun-95 Jun-97 Jan-92 Jan-94 Aug-91 Aug-93 Aug-97 Mar-86 Mar-90 Feb-91 Dec-91 Mar-92 Nov-92 Feb-93 Mar-94 Nov-94 Feb-95 Mar-96 Nov-96 Feb-97 Nov-98 Mar-99 Nov-99 Nov-99 Feb-00 Mar-01 Mar-03 Sep-90 Sep-92 Sep-94 Sep-96 Sep-98 Sep-99 Sep-01 Sep-03 May-86 May-87 May-88 May-89 May-90 May-92 May-94 May-96 May-98 May-99 May-01 May-03 (Figure 2-Line indicates domestic water supply criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Habs/Haer Inventory
    HABS/HAER U.S. Department of the Interior JUiN 2 National Park Service 1. SITE I.D. NO INVENTORY Washington, DC 20240 2 NAME(S) OF STRUCTURE 5 ORIGINAL USE 7 CLASSIFICATION 9. RATING Slate Creek Bridge SU01 roadway bridge BT&A: TRUSS: STEEL local Bridge over Blue River 10. DATE CDH: 117145000.40005 1924 3 SITE ADDRESS (STREET & NO) 6. PRESENT USE County Road 1450 over Blue River roadway bridge 12.6 miles north of Dill on UTMZONE EASTING NORTHING SE% S18, T3S, R78W 1 3 400505 4404160 RMRO 4 CITY/VICINITY COUNTY STATE 1:24 1:62.5 QUAD Slate Creek Summit Colorado OTHER .NAME. Squaw Creek 12. OWNER/ADMIN ADDRESS Summit County Summit County Courthouse 208 East Lincoln Breckenridge Colorado 80424 13 DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND HISTORY INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION DATE(S). PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS. MATERIALS. MAJOR ALTERATIONS. EXTANT EQUIPMENT. AND IMPORTANT BUILDERS, ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, ETC Rigid-connected, 8-panel steel Parker pony truss w/ buttresses span number: 1 end/top chrd: 2 channels w/ cover plate and lacing span length: 98'6" bottom chord: 2 channels w/ batten plates overall length: 103'8" vertical: 4 angles w/ continuous plate roadway width : 20'0" diagonal: 2-4 angles w/ batten plates fir./decking: monolithic concrete deck over steel floor beams substructure: concrete wingwalls By 1923 the existing bridge over the Blue River at the small community of Slate Creek had deteriorated to the point of replacement. In May a construction contract under Federal Aid Project 207 was awarded to bridge contractors Rogers and Pickard; work on the abutments began soon thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • USFWS Bridge Inspection Handbook
    A guide to the proper safety inspection and evaluation of vehicular bridges on USFWS facilities U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service BRIDGE Division of Engineering INSPECTION HANDBOOK USFWS Bridge Inspection Handbook BMO/DEN/DBSS/RRB 10/17/2014 Bridge Inspection Handbook Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SCOPE OF HANDBOOK ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 USFWS RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 BRIDGE INSPECTION TEAM ............................................................................................................... 2 2.3 TYPES OF INSPECTIONS ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.3.1 Initial Inspection .................................................................................................................... 3 2.3.2 Routine Inspection ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Preserving Historic Bridges
    Appendix B—State Departments of Transportation Alabama Department of Transportation Florida Department of Transportation 1409 Coliseum Boulevard 605 Suwannee Street Montgomery, AL 36130 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 (334) 242-6311 (850) 488-8541 (334) 262-8041 (fax) (850) 277-3403 (fax) Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Georgia Department of Transportation 3132 Channel Drive 2 Capital Square Juneau, AK 99801-7898 Atlanta, GA 30334 (907) 465-3900 (404) 656-5206 (907) 586-8365 (fax) (404) 657-8389 (fax) Internet address: [email protected] Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Hawaii Department of Transportation Phoenix, AZ 85007 869 Punchbowl Street (602) 255-7011 Honolulu, HI 96813-5097 (602) 256-7659 (fax) (808) 587-2150 (808) 587-2167 (fax) Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department State Highway Department Building Idaho Transportation Department P.O. Box 2261, 10324 Interstate 30 3311 W. State Street Little Rock, AR 72203 P.O. Box 7129 (501) 569-2000 Boise, ID 83707 (501) 569-2400 (fax) (208) 334-8000 (208) 334-3858 (fax) California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street Illinois Department of Transportation P.O. Box 942673 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 Springfield, IL 62764 (916) 654-5266 (217) 782-5597 (217) 782-6828 (fax) Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Indiana Department of Transportation Denver, CO 80222 Indiana Government Center North (303) 757-9201 100 North Senate Avenue (303) 757-9149 (fax) Indianapolis, IN 46204-2249 (317) 232-5533 Connecticut Department of Transportation (317) 232-0238 (fax) P.O. Box 317546 / 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06131-7546 Iowa Department of Transportation (860) 594-3000 800 Lincoln Way Ames, IA 50010 Delaware Department of Transportation (515) 239-1101 Bay Road, Route 113, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN CAUSEWAY HAER LA-21 and SOUTHERN TOLL PLAZA Causeway Boulevard Metairie Jefferson Parish Louisiana
    LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN CAUSEWAY HAER LA-21 AND SOUTHERN TOLL PLAZA Causeway Boulevard Metairie Jefferson Parish Louisiana PHOTOGRAPHS COPIES OF COLOR TRANSPARENCIES WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN CAUSEWAY AND SOUTHERN TOLL PLAZA HAER LA-21 Page 1 Location: The Lake Pontchartrain Causeway spans Lake Pontchartrain from Causeway Boulevard in Metairie, Jefferson Parish to Highway 190, Mandeville, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana. The southern Toll Plaza was located at the Jefferson Parish terminus of the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway. The Northern Terminus of the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway is located at 30.365 and -90.094167. The Southern Terminus is located at 30.02 and - 90.153889. This information was acquired using Google Earth imagery. There are no restrictions on the release of this information to the public. USGS Quadrangle maps (7.5 minute series): (north to south) Mandeville, Spanish Fort NE, West of Spanish Fort NE, Indian Beach There are no restrictions on this information. Owner: Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission Present Use: Vehicle Bridge Significance: When completed in 1956, the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway was the world’s longest bridge. This record was broken by completion of the parallel span in 1969. At 23.87 miles long, the Causeway is the world’s longest continuous span over water. The prestressed, pre-cast concrete structural system displays mid-twentieth century technology that typifies modern bridge construction techniques. In addition, the Causeway is significant in the development of the Jefferson and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Ageing of Yellow-Breasted Bunting and Separation from Chestnut Bunting
    Identification and ageing of Yellow-breasted Bunting and separation from Chestnut Bunting Jari Peltomäki & Jukka Jantunen ellow-breasted Emberiza aureola and Chest- Poland (5), Spain (1) and Sweden (24+). Chestnut Y nut Buntings E rutila are two species of Bunting is a much rarer vagrant in Europe and its which the breeding and wintering areas are pre- occurrence is clouded by the possibility of dominantly situated in the Eastern Palearctic. The escaped birds. The adult male being a colourful breeding areas of Yellow-breasted Bunting, how- bird, Chestnut Bunting is a popular cagebird and, ever, extend well into the Western Palearctic, therefore, most records from Europe are general- covering large parts of Russia and reaching into ly thought to concern escapes. There are, how- Finland, whereas Chestnut Bunting’s breeding ever, a few records of immature birds ‘at the right areas extend just west of Lake Baikal in Russia. time and the right place’. These autumn occur- Yellow-breasted and Chestnut Buntings are long- rences of first-winter birds, suggestive of genuine distance migrants and winter in south-eastern vagrancy, have been in the Netherlands (5 No- Asia and both species occur as vagrants in (west- vember 1937), Norway (13-15 October 1974), ern) Europe. Yellow-breasted Bunting is a regular Malta (November 1983) and former Yugoslavia vagrant in Europe outside its breeding area with (10 October 1987). Although Vinicombe & Cot- annual records in Britain (mainly on the northern tridge (1996) list Chestnut Bunting as an Eastern isles of
    [Show full text]