Feedback Control: an Invisible Thread In
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Control Engineering for High School Students and Teachers: an Online Platform Development
Control Engineering for High School Students and Teachers: An Online Platform Development Farhad Farokhi and Iman Shames Contents Report ............................................ 1 1 Introduction . 1 2 Courses . 1 3 Interviews . 2 4 Educational games . 3 5 Remote laboratory . 4 6 Conclusions and future work . 5 Appendix .......................................... 6 A Example course 1: Feedback theory . 6 B Example course 2: Models . 9 C Example course 3: On/off control . 12 D Remote laboratory (RLAB) manual . 13 1 Introduction Based on our teen years and feedback from many of our colleagues and friends, we believe that the control engineering, although being a major building block of automated system in many processes and infrastructures, is a fairly alien subject to the students, parents, and teachers. Therefore, there is a need for introducing feedback control and its application to high school students and their teachers to recruit the next generation of engineers and scientists in this field. We also believe that the academic community has a responsibility to disseminate the information cheaply, if not freely, to a wide range of interested audience, be it students, parents, or teachers, across the globe. This way, we can guarantee that people from different socio- economic backgrounds and in different countries can make informed decisions regarding their careers and those of their friends and families. Motivated by these needs, in this project, we have attempted at developing an online platform for the students and their educators to read about the control engineering, watch lectures by researchers from academia and industry, access interviews with successful people in the control engineering community, and play online games to test their understanding and to possibly learn about the applications of the automatic control. -
EE C128 Chapter 10
Lecture abstract EE C128 / ME C134 – Feedback Control Systems Topics covered in this presentation Lecture – Chapter 10 – Frequency Response Techniques I Advantages of FR techniques over RL I Define FR Alexandre Bayen I Define Bode & Nyquist plots I Relation between poles & zeros to Bode plots (slope, etc.) Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science st nd University of California Berkeley I Features of 1 -&2 -order system Bode plots I Define Nyquist criterion I Method of dealing with OL poles & zeros on imaginary axis I Simple method of dealing with OL stable & unstable systems I Determining gain & phase margins from Bode & Nyquist plots I Define static error constants September 10, 2013 I Determining static error constants from Bode & Nyquist plots I Determining TF from experimental FR data Bayen (EECS, UCB) Feedback Control Systems September 10, 2013 1 / 64 Bayen (EECS, UCB) Feedback Control Systems September 10, 2013 2 / 64 10 FR techniques 10.1 Intro Chapter outline 1 10 Frequency response techniques 1 10 Frequency response techniques 10.1 Introduction 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Asymptotic approximations: Bode plots 10.2 Asymptotic approximations: Bode plots 10.3 Introduction to Nyquist criterion 10.3 Introduction to Nyquist criterion 10.4 Sketching the Nyquist diagram 10.4 Sketching the Nyquist diagram 10.5 Stability via the Nyquist diagram 10.5 Stability via the Nyquist diagram 10.6 Gain margin and phase margin via the Nyquist diagram 10.6 Gain margin and phase margin via the Nyquist diagram 10.7 Stability, gain margin, and -
IT Legacy Article Compendium
An IT Legacy Booklet March 2016 IT Legacy Article Compendium 1 INTRODUCTION – LOWELL A. BENSON, EDITOR Write a Book? How about an autobiography? Shortly after the Information Technology (IT) Legacy Committee was formed, Dick Lundgren began to write Legacy articles for the VIP Club newsletter. During the committee’s decade of volunteering, several other committee members have also written Legacy associated newsletter items. This booklet1 is a collection of those VIP Club newsletter articles. The first several articles are the history of the Legacy Committee as we felt our way through the quagmire of gathering documents and hardware artifacts and then cataloging them. So, to some degree, this is both a book and the IT Legacy Committee’s autobiography. This book complements our December 2015 ‘Article for the Month’. That too was a booklet: Measuring Success = Volunteer Hours; recapping a decade with summaries of over 100 on-line IT Legacy articles. I dedicate this document to James 'Rapp' Rapinac who passed away 23 January 2016. Rapp was a steadfast supporter of our legacy initiatives and a good friend. LABenson If you are using Adobe reader; clicking on any section in the table of contents will get you there. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction – Lowell A. Benson, editor ......................................................................................... 1 3 2006, First Year Articles ................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 March 2006 – Richard Lundgren ........................................................................................... -
Aircraft Propellers
U.S. WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION BIBLIOGRAPHY OF A E R 0 N A U T I C S Part 27 - Aircraft Propellers Compiled from the INDEX OF AERONAUTICS of the INSTITUTE OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York City The Index and Bibliographies have been prepared by workers under the supervision of the U.S. WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION Cecil A. Ross Senior Project Supervisor Project 465-97-S-S1 (Formerly 165-97-6055) 19 3 7 FOREWORD This bibliography is one of a series which aims to cover a large part of aeronautical literature. It is pub lished by the U. S. Works Progress Administration Project 465-97-3-21 (formerly 165-97-6055) under the sponsorship of the New York City Department of Docks with the cooperation of the Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences. Request for Additions The Institute of the Aeronautical Sciences which is directing the U. S. Works Progress Administration staff of workers will appreciate receiving additional references, corrections and criticism, so that the bibliographies will be.more helpful when issued in final form. Request for Copies The bibliographies have been prepared with funds allotted by the U. S. Works Progress Administration. They may not be sold. Persons and organizations wishing to procure copies may apply for them by letter, stating the use for which they are needed. When it is possible to prepare additional copies such requests will receive first consideration. Robert R. Dexter Aeronautical Engineer Address all correspondence to: John R. Palmer Managing Project Supervisor U- S. Works Progress Administration 5111 R.C.A. -
Download Chapter 161KB
Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 HENDRIK WADE BODE 50 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 3 HENDRIK WADE BODE 51 Hendrik Wade Bode 1905–1982 By Harvey Brooks Hendrik Wade Bode was widely known as one of the most articulate, thoughtful exponents of the philosophy and practice of systems engineering—the science and art of integrating technical components into a coherent system that is optimally adapted to its social function. After a career of more than forty years with Bell Telephone Laboratories, which he joined shortly after its founding in 1926, Dr. Bode retired in 1967 to become Gordon McKay Professor of Systems Engineering (on a half-time basis) in what was then the Division of Engineering and Applied Physics at Harvard. He became professor emeritus in July 1974. He died at his home in Cambridge on June 21, 1982, at the age of seventy- six. He is survived by his wife, Barbara Poore Bode, whom he married in 1933, and by two daughters, Dr. Katharine Bode Darlington of Philadelphia and Mrs. Anne Hathaway Bode Aarnes of Washington, D.C. Hendrik Bode was born in Madison, Wisconsin, on December 24, 1905. After attending grade school in Tempe, Arizona, and high school in Urbana, Illinois, he went on to Ohio State University, from which he received his B.A. in 1924 and his M.A. in 1926, both in mathematics. He joined Bell Labs in 1926 to work on electrical network theory and the design of electric filters. While at Bell, he also pursued graduate studies at Columbia University, receiving his Ph.D. -
Review of Feedback Systems
CHAPTER 1 Review of Feedback Systems Marc Thompson Dr. Marc Thompson leads us to an appreciation of how the world has learned about FEEDBACK (negative) over the years, so we can understand how to do better feedback in our systems. /rap Introduction and Some Early History of Feedback Control A feedback system is one that compares its output to a desired input and takes corrective action to force the output to follow the input. Arguably, the beginnings of automatic feedback control 1 can be traced back to the work of James Watt in the 1700s. Watt did lots of work on steam engines, and he adapted 2 a centrifugal governor to automatically control the speed of a steam engine. The governor comprised two rotating metal balls that would fl y out due to centrifugal force. The amount of “ fl y-out ” was then used to regulate the speed of the steam engine by adjusting a throttle. This was an example of proportional control. The steam engines of Watt ’ s day worked well with the governor, but as steam engines became larger and better engineered, it was found that there could be stability problems in the engine speed. One of the problems was hunting , or an engine speed that would surge and decrease, apparently hunting for a stable operating point. This phenomenon was not well understood until the latter part of the 19th century, when James Maxwell 3 (yes, the same Maxwell famous for all those equations) developed the mathematics of the stability of the Watt governor using differential equations. 1 Others may argue that the origins of feedback control trace back to the water clocks and fl oat regulators of the ancients. -
Science and the Instrument-Maker
r f ^ Science and the Instrument-maker MICHELSON, SPERRY, AND THE SPEED OF LIGHT Thomas Parke Hughes SMITHSONIAN STUDIES IN HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY • NUMBER 37 Science and the Instrument-maker MICHELSON, SPERRY, AND THE SPEED OF LIGHT Thomas Parke Hughes Qmit/isoDian Ij;i^titution 'PJ^SS City of Washington 1976 ABSTRACT Hughes, Thomas Parke. Science and the Instrument-maker: Michelson, Sperry, and the Speed of Light. Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology, number 37, 18 pages, 9 figures, 2 tables, 1976.-This essay focuses on the cooperative efforts between A. A. Michelson, physicist, and Elmer Ambrose Sperry, inventor, to produce the instr.umentation for the determination of the speed of light. At the conclusion of experiments made in 1926, Michelson assigned the Sperry in struments the highest marks for accuracy. The value of the speed of light accepted by many today (299,792.5 km/sec) varies only 2.5 km/sec from that obtained using the Sperry octagonal steel mirror. The main problems of producing the instrumentation, human error in the communication of ideas to effect that in strumentation, a brief description of the experiments to determine the speed of light, and the analysis and evaluation of the results are discussed. OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's report, Smithsonian Year. Si PRESS NUMBER 6I41. COVER: A. A. Michelson and Elmer Ambrose Sperry. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hughes, Thomas Parke. Science and the instrument-maker. (Smithsonian studies in histoi7 and technology ; no. 37) Supt. -
UNIT CONVERSION FACTORS Temperature K C 273 C 1.8(F 32
Source: FUNDAMENTALS OF MICROSYSTEMS PACKAGING UNIT CONVERSION FACTORS Temperature K ϭ ЊC ϩ 273 ЊC ϭ 1.8(ЊF Ϫ 32) ЊR ϭ ЊF ϩ 460 Length 1 m ϭ 1010 A˚ ϭ 3.28 ft ϭ 39.4 in Mass 1 kg ϭ 2.2 lbm Force 1 N ϭ 1 kg-m/s2 ϭ 0.225 lbf Pressure (stress) 1 P ϭ 1 N/m2 ϭ 1.45 ϫ 10Ϫ4 psi Energy 1 J ϭ 1W-sϭ 1 N-m ϭ 1V-C 1Jϭ 0.239 cal ϭ 6.24 ϫ 1018 eV Current 1 A ϭ 1 C/s ϭ 1V/⍀ CONSTANTS Avogadro’s Number 6.02 ϫ 1023 moleϪ1 Gas Constant, R 8.314 J/(mole-K) Boltzmann’s constant, k 8.62 ϫ 10Ϫ5 eV/K Planck’s constant, h 6.63 ϫ 10Ϫ33 J-s Speed of light in a vacuum, c 3 ϫ 108 m/s Electron charge, q 1.6 ϫ 10Ϫ18 C SI PREFIXES giga, G 109 mega, M 106 kilo, k 103 centi, c 10Ϫ2 milli, m 10Ϫ3 micro, 10Ϫ6 nano, n 10Ϫ9 Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com) Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website. Source: FUNDAMENTALS OF MICROSYSTEMS PACKAGING CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO MICROSYSTEMS PACKAGING Prof. Rao R. Tummala Georgia Institute of Technology ................................................................................................................. Design Environment IC Thermal Management Packaging Single Materials Chip Opto and RF Functions Discrete Passives Encapsulation IC Reliability IC Assembly Inspection PWB MEMS Board Manufacturing Assembly Test Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com) Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. -
MT-033: Voltage Feedback Op Amp Gain and Bandwidth
MT-033 TUTORIAL Voltage Feedback Op Amp Gain and Bandwidth INTRODUCTION This tutorial examines the common ways to specify op amp gain and bandwidth. It should be noted that this discussion applies to voltage feedback (VFB) op amps—current feedback (CFB) op amps are discussed in a later tutorial (MT-034). OPEN-LOOP GAIN Unlike the ideal op amp, a practical op amp has a finite gain. The open-loop dc gain (usually referred to as AVOL) is the gain of the amplifier without the feedback loop being closed, hence the name “open-loop.” For a precision op amp this gain can be vary high, on the order of 160 dB (100 million) or more. This gain is flat from dc to what is referred to as the dominant pole corner frequency. From there the gain falls off at 6 dB/octave (20 dB/decade). An octave is a doubling in frequency and a decade is ×10 in frequency). If the op amp has a single pole, the open-loop gain will continue to fall at this rate as shown in Figure 1A. A practical op amp will have more than one pole as shown in Figure 1B. The second pole will double the rate at which the open- loop gain falls to 12 dB/octave (40 dB/decade). If the open-loop gain has dropped below 0 dB (unity gain) before it reaches the frequency of the second pole, the op amp will be unconditionally stable at any gain. This will be typically referred to as unity gain stable on the data sheet. -
History of Nonlinear Oscillations Theory in France (1880–1940)
Archimedes 49 New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology Jean-Marc Ginoux History of Nonlinear Oscillations Theory in France (1880–1940) History of Nonlinear Oscillations Theory in France (1880–1940) Archimedes NEW STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 49 EDITOR JED Z. BUCHWALD, Dreyfuss Professor of History, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA. ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES JEREMY GRAY, The Faculty of Mathematics and Computing, The Open University, UK. TILMAN SAUER, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany ASSOCIATE EDITORS FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES SHARON KINGSLAND, Department of History of Science and Technology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA. MANFRED LAUBICHLER, Arizona State University, USA ADVISORY BOARD FOR MATHEMATICS, PHYSICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HENK BOS, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands MORDECHAI FEINGOLD, California Institute of Technology, USA ALLAN D. FRANKLIN, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA KOSTAS GAVROGLU, National Technical University of Athens, Greece PAUL HOYNINGEN-HUENE, Leibniz University in Hannover, Germany TREVOR LEVERE, University of Toronto, Canada JESPER LÜTZEN, Copenhagen University, Denmark WILLIAM NEWMAN, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA LAWRENCE PRINCIPE, The Johns Hopkins University, USA JÜRGEN RENN, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Germany ALEX ROLAND, Duke University, USA ALAN SHAPIRO, University of Minnesota, USA NOEL SWERDLOW, California Institute of Technology, -
Genios De La Ingeniería Eléctrica
Genios de la Ingeniería Eléctrica COLECCIÓN GIGANTES Genios de la Ingeniería Eléctrica De la A a la Z Jesús Fraile Mora Fundación Iberdrola • 2006 • Patronato de la Fundación Iberdrola Presidente: D. Íñigo de Oriol Ybarra Vicepresidente: D. Javier Herrero Sorriqueta Patronos: D. Ricardo Álvarez Isasi D. José Ignacio Berroeta Echevarría D. José Orbegozo Arroyo D. Ignacio de Pinedo Cabezudo D. Antonio Sáenz de Miera D. Ignacio Sánchez Galán D. Víctor Urrutia Vallejo Secretario: D. Federico San Sebastián Flechoso Colección Gigantes Genios de la Ingeniería Eléctrica. De la A a la Z. © Jesús Fraile Mora © Fundación Iberdrola C/ Serrano, 26 - 1.ª 28001 Madrid Director de la Colección: José Luis de la Fuente O´Connor Editora: Marina Conde Morala ISBN: 84-609-9775-8 Depósito legal: M. 11.849-2006 Diseño, preimpresión e impresión: Gráficas Arias Montano, S. A. 28935 Móstoles (Madrid) Impreso en España - Printed in Spain Reservados todos los derechos. Está prohibido reproducir, registrar o transmitir esta publicación, íntegra o parcialmente, salvo para fines de crítica o comentario, por cualquier medio digital o analógico, sin permiso por escrito de los depositarios de los derechos. Los análisis, opiniones, conclusiones y recomendaciones que se puedan verter en esta publicación son del autor y no tienen por qué coincidir necesariamente con los de la Fundación Iberdrola. AGRADECIMIENTOS Quienquiera que se dedique a un trabajo de investigación histórica de la guisa de éste, se convierte en una pesadilla para los biblioteca- rios. Han sido muchos los años que me he dedicado a hurgar en los fondos antiguos de diversas bibliotecas, en busca de libros y revistas de todo tipo, por lo que he tenido tiempo de convivir con archi- veros y bibliotecarios que soportaron con paciencia y buen humor todas mis depredaciones. -
Loop Stability Compensation Technique for Continuous-Time Common-Mode Feedback Circuits
Loop Stability Compensation Technique for Continuous-Time Common-Mode Feedback Circuits Young-Kyun Cho and Bong Hyuk Park Mobile RF Research Section, Advanced Mobile Communications Research Department Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) Daejeon, Korea Email: [email protected] Abstract—A loop stability compensation technique for continuous-time common-mode feedback (CMFB) circuits is presented. A Miller capacitor and nulling resistor in the compensation network provide a reliable and stable operation of the fully-differential operational amplifier without any performance degradation. The amplifier is designed in a 130 nm CMOS technology, achieves simulated performance of 57 dB open loop DC gain, 1.3-GHz unity-gain frequency and 65° phase margin. Also, the loop gain, bandwidth and phase margin of the CMFB are 51 dB, 27 MHz, and 76°, respectively. Keywords-common-mode feedback, loop stability compensation, continuous-time system, Miller compensation. Fig. 1. Loop stability compensation technique for CMFB circuit. I. INTRODUCTION common-mode signal to the opamp. In Fig. 1, two poles are The differential output amplifiers usually contain common- newly generated from the CMFB loop. A dominant pole is mode feedback (CMFB) circuitry [1, 2]. A CMFB circuit is a introduced at the opamp output and the second pole is located network sensing the common-mode voltage, comparing it with at the VCMFB node. Typically, the location of these poles are a proper reference, and feeding back the correct common-mode very close which deteriorates the loop phase margin (PM) and signal with the purpose to cancel the output common-mode makes the closed loop system unstable.