DOCSLIB.ORG

Transcultural Exchange's 2013 Conference on International

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Photo: Laura Chichisan TransCultural Exchange‘s 2013 Conference on International Opportunities in the Arts: Engaging Minds Economic Impact Analysis and Program Evaluation 516 East 2nd Street, #30 Boston, MA 02127 617.464.4086 www.transculturalexchange.org 2013 Conference on International Opportunities in the Arts: Engaging Minds Economic Impact Analysis and Program Evaluation Evaluation Staff Submitted by Mary Sherman Research Assistant Tanya Gruenberger Lindsay Ladner Fahrin Zaman Editorial Assistance Marie Costello Lindsay Ladner Fahrin Zaman Layout Siyi Yang Online Survey Tool and Methodology Developed for TransCultural Exchange: Center for Policy Analysis at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Correspondence and inquiries should be addressed to TransCultural Exchange, 516 E. 2nd Street, #30, Boston, Massachusetts, 02127 617.464.4086, [email protected] 2013 Conference on International Opportunities in the Arts Economic Impact Analysis and Program Evaluation Table of Contents If you are interested in a particular section, please click on the section number. FORWARD 1.00 INTRODUCTION 1.10 Summary 1.11 Arts in the Global Economy 1.12 Added Benefit: The Impact of Arts on Society, Culture and Politics 1.20 A brief history of TransCultural Exchange and its Conference on International Opportunities for the Arts 1.30 Logistics 1.31 Conference, Exhibition and Exchange Support 1.32 Conference Headquarters and Exhibition Facilities 1.33 Conference Staff and Support 2.00 ECONOMIC IMPACT AND SURVEY EVALUATION 2.10 Methodology 2.11 Process Evaluation 2.12 Survey Evaluation 3.00 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 3.10 Overview 3.11 TransCultural Exchange Expenditure 3.12 Conference Attendee Expenditures 3.13 Total Direct, Indirect and Induced Economic Impacts 4.00 PRELIMINARY OUTCOMES 4.10 Goal 1: Creating a Catalyst for International Exchange 4.11 Dates and Attendance 4.12 Examples of Events 4.13 Benefits to Artists‘ Careers 4.14 Benefits to Institutions and Conference Partners 4.15 Measures of Customer Satisfaction 4.16 Website 4.17 Press Coverage 4.20 Goal 2: Strengthening Communities 4.21 Showcasing Massachusetts‘ Creative Economy 4.22 Promoting a Positive View of America Abroad 5.00 SURVEY INSTRUMENTS AND FINDINGS 5.10 Methodology 5.20 General Information 5.21 Place of Residence 5.22 How did you participate in the Conference? 5.23 What is your annual income level? 5.24 What is your age? 5.25 How did you find out about the Conference? 5.26 The program session and/or Conference activity respondents thought was most valuable. 5.27 Which one of the following best describes you? 5.28 How long have you held your current position? 5.29 If you are an artist, how would you describe your work? 5.30 Spending Data: Approximately how much in total did you spend during your stay in Boston on the following items? 5.40 Satisfaction with the Conference 5.41 What other activities did you attend during the Conference? 5.42 Overall, how would you rate the quality and efficiency of the following aspects of the Conference? 5.50 Interest in Future Conferences 5.51 Would you be interested in attending a similar Conference in 2015? 5.52 Would you be interested in attending a residency program in the Boston area that included international artists? 5.53 Would you be interested in attending a similar conference overseas? 5.60 Open-Ended Questions 5.61 If you attended any of TransCultural Exchange's previous Conferences, how did you benefit from that event? 5.62 Have you participated in any other non-Conference event by TransCultural Exchange or used any other of the organization's services? 5.63 If you did participate in a non-Conference TransCultural Exchange event, did you benefit from that experience? How? 5.64 How do you think this Conference will benefit your career? 5.65 What new skills/knowledge/expertise did you gain from attending the Conference? 5.70 Moving Forward 5.71 How would you improve the TransCultural Exhange Conference 5.72 What would be helpful for you to have on TransCultural Exchange's website? 5.73 Is there anything you wish you had known before attending the Conference? 5.74 What other kinds of activities would you like to see TransCultural Exchange do? 5.75 What Information or topic would you like included in the next Conference? 5.80 Additional Comments 6.00 2014 FOLLOW UP SURVEY 6.10 General Information 6.11 Place of Residence 6.12 Profession 6.13 How long have you held your current position? 6.14 Do you support yourself solely as an artist? 6.20 Arts Events Attendance 6.21 Aside from presentations of your own work, how often do you attend…? 6.22 What is you primary motivation for attending these events? 6.23 Are there obstacles that keep you from attending these events? 6.30 International Involvement 6.31 During the course of a year, how often do you travel abroad? 6.32 If you have had any other experience working internationally (non- TransCultural Exchange related) what impact did it have on your work? 6.33 National vs. International Exposure? 6.40 How do you see your work contributing to the field of art, other fields of study or society in general? 6.50 What activities, resources or types of connections would be fruitful to your development as an artist? APPENDIX A – SURVEY INSTRUMENT A1 - 2013 CONFERENCE SURVEY EVALUATION A2 - 2014 POST CONFERENCE SURVEY A3 - 2011 CONFERENCE SURVEY APPENDIX B - ECONOMIC IMPACT METHODOLOGY APPENDIX C - 2014 AND 2013 SURVEY OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES APPENDIX D – 2011 SURVEY OPEN-ENDED RESPONSES APPENDIX E - PRESS BIBILIOGRAPHY APPENDIX F - CONFERENCE PRESENTERS APPENDIX G - 2013 CONFERENCE PROGRAM SCHEDULE APPENDIX H - TRANSCULTURAL EXCHANGE’S 10TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE COASTER PROJECT, DESTINATION: THE WORLD APPENDIX I - TRANSCULTURAL EXCHANGE'S BROCHURE FOR FLORIAN DUMBOIS' UBOC NO. 1 AND STUVI2 APPENDIX J - MINISTRY OF CULTURE, REPUBLIC OF CHINA, TAIWAN'S BROCHURE FOR TAIWAN ARTIST ACTIONS: REACHING BEYOND APPENDIX K – TRANSCULTURAL EXCHANGE'S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ADVISORY BOARD AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FORWARD TransCultural Exchange is a U.S. 501(c)(3) non-profit organization,1 best known for its biennale Conferences on International Opportunities in the Arts, which are unique in their scope and aim. The Conferences are designed for artists. Their goal is to acquaint them with international programs that support their work and put them in touch with new cultures, ideas and ways of thinking. The speakers come from around the world. They are artists-in-residency directors, curators, critics, grant makers, funders, gallerists and even scientists. The Conferences came about from TransCultural Exchange realizing that, although other professionals have conferences to meet their peers, share ideas, learn about the latest developments and network, artists did not. Consequently, in the US, many artists may know of such artist-in-residencies as the MacDowell Colony and Yadoo; but, they would be hard pressed to name another. Yet, there are over four hundred such national and international programs to serve them. Today, the proliferation of residencies – as well as biennales, open studio events and the internet – are changing how art is being made and sold. Alongside such traditional media as painting and sculpture, there are now ephemeral works, social interventions, installations and public interactions. The 19th century invention of the gallery system is waning. A heady new array of possibilities is taking its place. And, these, combined with the rapid-fire onslaught of newer and newer products and ideas, the accompanying anxiety of super-sized, global competition and the race to keep up with the inevitable rise of insatiable appetites causes everything to speed up. Complex ideas are reduced to elevator pitches. Everything is about getting to the end point before anyone else; and, then . getting to the next one. There is little time for discussion, still less for reflection and none for failure. Throughout history and across cultures, the arts have stood in opposition to this. Since the dawn of civilization, they have accompanied and provided us with avenues for reflection. They offer insights into our past, present and future. They engage our senses, our primary means of accessing and knowing the world. Yet at the moment, they seem left flaying about, like a fish out of water, in search of a justification. 1 In 1989 the artists-run TransCultural Exchange was created to produce the organization‘s first project, an exhibtion, film screening and reading of Chicago and Viennese artists‘ works. Then, on September 17th, 2002, the organization incorporated as a 501(c)3 non-profit in the State of Massachusetts. On March 11th, 2013 TransCultural Exchange expanded its operations, opening a ‗daughter‘ NGO in Berlin, TCE TransCultural Exchange gemeinnützige GmbH. This demand for qualifiable and quantifiable justification is nothing new; but the situation is worsening. Nor is it unique to America. If the new European Union funding guidelines are any indication, then European art institutions are beginning to feel the sting of this bottom-line myopia as well2. This means, unfortunately, that it is not enough for artists and those who support them to do great work and advance their field, they need to adopt the same, very time-consuming strategies for justification. In other words, it is no longer enough to create, support and show people great art, those who make and support it also have to, for instance, gather statistics to be able to say X number of people attended their programs and X said they learned X. Moreover, in terms of food, beverages and other indirect impacts, X amount of revenue was generated, and if one adds direct impacts as well . This is exactly the aim of this publication. Sadly without this kind of data, TransCultural Exchange would not have survived past its first Conference.
Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Plan

    Conceptual Plan

    About the Cover Photo The photo on the cover of this report was taken on December 17, 2010, around 8:00 AM. The view is from the Savin Hill Avenue overpass and looks almost directly south. This overpass is shown in Figure 3-3 of the report, and the field of view includes land shown in Figure 3-2. At the right is the recently completed headhouse of the Savin Hill Red Line station. Stopped at the station platform is an inbound Red Line train that started at Ashmont and will travel to Alewife. The station is fully ADA-compliant, and the plan presented in this report requires no modification to this station. Next to the Red Line train is an inbound train from one of the three Old Colony commuter rail branches. There is only one track at this location, as is the case throughout most of the Old Colony system. This train has a mixed consist of single-level and bi-level coaches, and is being pushed by a diesel locomotive, which is mostly hidden from view by the bi-level coaches. Between the two trains is an underpass beneath the Ashmont branch of the Red Line. This had been a freight spur serving an industrial area on the west side of the Ashmont branch tracks. Sections A-2.3 and A-2.4 of this report present an approach to staging railroad reconstruction that utilizes the abandoned freight spur and underpass. The two tracks to the left of the Old Colony tracks serve the Braintree Red Line branch.
  • Boston University Charles River Campus August 10, 2012 2012–2022 Institutional Master Plan

    Boston University Charles River Campus August 10, 2012 2012–2022 Institutional Master Plan

    Boston University Charles River Campus August 10, 2012 2012–2022 Institutional Master Plan Submitted by Trustees of Boston University Submitted to Boston Redevelopment Authority Prepared by Fort Point Associates, Inc. in association with: CBT Architects Greenberg Consultants, Inc. Tetra Tech TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 CAMPUS HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................... 1-1 1.2 UNIVERSITY VALUES, MISSION, AND GOALS ............................................................. 1-3 1.3 2012–2022 INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN ................................................................. 1-4 1.3.1 PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN .......................... 1-5 1.4 MASTER PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.4.1 BOSTON UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY TASK FORCE .......................................... 1-8 1.4.2 INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN PROJECT TEAM .............................................. 1-9 CHAPTER 2: CAMPUS DEMOGRAPHICS 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 STUDENT POPULATION ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT TRENDS ................................................................ 2-1 2.2.2 CURRENT POPULATION ..................................................................................

  • Draws YONEX Latvia International 2017

    YONEX Latvia International 2017 MS-Qualification Badminton Tournament Planner - bwf.tournamentsoftware.com Member ID St. Cnty Flag Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Finals Qualifiers 1 61900 CZE Filip Budzel [1] 2 Bye 3 70399 BEL Julien Carraggi 4 Bye 5 65789 FIN Juha Honkanen 6 Bye 7 61426 ISL Eidur Isak Broddason 8 82856 GER Simon Oziminski Q1 9 85443 LTU Povilas Bartusis [12] 10 Bye 11 61897 POL Robert Cybulski 12 Bye 13 77902 LTU Jonas Petkus 14 56849 BLR Dzmitry Saidakou 15 59407 NOR Mattias Xu 16 65678 UKR Ivan Medynskiy 17 95270 ENG Viknesh Rajendran [8] 18 Bye 19 65489 EST Mikk Järveoja 20 Bye 21 64456 SWE Oskar Svensson 22 Bye 23 69084 FIN Miika Lahtinen 24 73926 EST Karl-Rasmus Pungas Q2 25 60261 UKR Vladyslav Volnyanskiy [15] 26 Bye 27 98425 EST Alexander Raudsepp 28 Bye 29 72455 ISL Robert Ingi Huldarsson 30 61739 MAS Ridzwan Rahmat 31 90031 GER Saruul Shafiq 32 97423 EST Mikk Ounmaa 33 69685 ENG Zach Russ [3] 34 Bye 35 89135 LTU Mark Sames 36 Bye 37 78756 LAT Arturs Kelpe 38 Bye 39 61771 IRL Mark Brady 40 84442 LTU Edgaras Slusnys Q3 41 56275 DEN Mads Kjærgaard [16] 42 Bye 43 59413 LTU Karolis Eimutaitis 44 Bye 45 96316 EST Matis Kaart 46 62475 CZE Petr Beran 47 66199 LAT Kristaps Kalnins 48 78891 SUI Nicolas A. Mueller 49 56160 FIN Jesper Paul [7] 50 Bye 51 70534 LAT Janis Vaivads 52 Bye 53 64649 SWE Emil Johansson 54 66853 LTU Ignas Reznikas 55 52290 UKR Valeriy Atrashchenkov 56 76226 LAT Ivo Keiss Q4 57 68484 BLR Vladzislav Kushnir [14] 58 Bye 59 86632 UKR Artem Tkachuk 60 Bye 61 73269 SUI Jonas Schwarz 62 73950 MAS Muhammad Ziyad
  • 2016 International Artist Exchanges' Creative

    2016 International Artist Exchanges' Creative

    Photo: Laura Chichisan Why Support International Exchange among Artists? A Decade of Tracking the Economic, Cultural and Social Benefits of Doing So TransCultural Exchange’s Conferences on International Opportunities in the Arts Economic Impact Analysis and Program Evaluation 1 Why Support International Exchange among Artists? A Decade of Tracking the Economic, Cultural and Social Benefits of Doing So ______________________________________________________ Evaluation Staff Submitted by Carol Van Zandt/Mary Sherman Layout Carol Van Zandt/Siyi Yang Previous Surveys’ Research and Editing Support by Marie Costello, Tanya Gruenberger, Lindsay Ladner, Fahrin Zaman Online Survey Tool and Methodology Developed for TransCultural Exchange: Center for Policy Analysis at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth TransCultural Exchange would like to thank the Massachusetts Cultural Council, Boston Cultural Council and National Endowment for the Arts for the funding to help produce this publication. Correspondence and inquiries should be addressed to: TransCultural Exchange The Artist Building at 300 Summer Street, #36 Boston, Massachusetts, 02210 617.670.0307 [email protected] 2 TransCultural Exchange’s Conferences on International Opportunities in the Arts Economic Impact Analysis and Program Evaluation Table of Contents FORWARD p.6 1.00 INTRODUCTION p.10 1.10 SUMMARY 2.00 ECONOMIC IMPACT AND SURVEY EVALUATION p.30 2.10 Methodology 2.11 Process Evaluation 2.12 Survey Evaluation 3.00 ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS p.32 3.10 Overview 3.11
  • The Latvian Institute of International Affairs (LIIA)

    The Latvian Institute of International Affairs (LIIA)

    The Latvian Institute of International Affairs (LIIA) was established in May 1992 in Riga as a non-profit foundation charged with the aim of providing Latvia’s decision-makers, experts and the wider public with analysis, recommendations and information about international developments, regional security issues and foreign policy strategies and choices, and performing scientific research. It is an independent think-tank that conducts research, develops publications and organizes public lectures and international conferences related to global affairs and Latvia’s international role and policies. Among Latvian think tanks, the LIIA is the oldest and one of the most well-known and internationally recognized institutions, especially as the leading think tank that specializes in international affairs. In the LIIA's efforts to provide expertise from a Latvian perspective, the Institute and its fellows have participated in and coordinated various international research projects. The Institute has recently been focusing on such research themes as • Latvian foreign policy • Transatlantic relations • European Union institutional and financial developments and foreign policy positioning • Russia and its relations with its neighbours The LIIA has also devoted thorough attention to various aspects of energy security and policies: • EU energy policy, • EU-Russia energy dialogue, • national and regional (Central and East Europe, Baltic Sea region, post-Soviet space) energy interaction. The LIIA was founded and initially funded by several grants from the Swedish government to support research on Baltic security, and has cooperated with the Swedish Institute of International Affairs in skills transfer programmes for a number of years. The LIIA is currently financed by individual projects and does not receive permanent funding from any governmental or other non-governmental institutions.
  • Latvia Exporter Guide Report Categories: Exporter Guide Approved By: Russ Nicely, Agricultural Attaché Prepared By: Magdalena Osinska

    Latvia Exporter Guide Report Categories: Exporter Guide Approved By: Russ Nicely, Agricultural Attaché Prepared By: Magdalena Osinska

    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 4/13/2017 GAIN Report Number: Poland Post: Warsaw Latvia Exporter Guide Report Categories: Exporter Guide Approved By: Russ Nicely, Agricultural Attaché Prepared By: Magdalena Osinska Report Highlights: The Latvian economy is expected to steadily grow over the next few years. In 2015 total Latvian agricultural imports amounted to U.S. $2.7 billion with U.S. $8.5 million originating from the United States. Products from the U.S. that have good sales potential on the Latvian market include: fish and seafood products, beef, nuts and wines and distilled spirits. This report provides U.S. food and agriculture exporters with background information and recommendations for entering the Latvian market. General Information: SECTION I. MARKET SUMMARY In 2009-2014 Latvia’s economy was one of the fastest growing in the European Union (EU) mostly due to financial support from the EU and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that followed the financial crisis of 2008-2009. During 2015 Latvia’s economic growth rate increased by 2.7 percent. Further increase in the real GDP growth is expected in the forthcoming years. According to the latest data of the Central Statistical Bureau, in 2016 average consumer prices increased by 0.6 percent as compared to 2015. Increase in prices of food and non-alcoholic beverages, recreation and culture, alcohol and tobacco mostly influenced the level of consumer prices in 2016. Consumer expenditure per capita in 2015 reached U.S.
  • BU-Campus-Map.Pdf

    BU-Campus-Map.Pdf

    CAMBRIDGE Memorial Drive Memorial Drive 51 MBTA Subway BU Shuttle Bus Stops Public Parking North BU Parking Footbridge to Esplanade Massachusetts Turnpike Extension Charles River Soldiers Field Road 1 Ashford Street 3 MALVERN FIELD Gardner Street NICKERSONFIELD Storrow Drive Danielsen Hall 29 43 45 4 Deerfield Street BU Beach 5 Bay State Road Raleigh Street 18 19 50 Babcock Street Babcock 9 10 16 26 39 6 Boston University Bridge 22 17 46 Alcorn Street Alcorn Buick Street 4140 48 Granby Street Granby 13 Way Silber 2 Way Harry Agganis 8 11 14 2120 25 2827 35 36 44 47 University Road B Line G F E D Commonwealth Avenue C B A Kenmore Square 30 49 7 12 15 37 31 33 Cummington Street 38 23 42 Naples RoadNaples Amory Street St. Paul Street Paul St. Dummer Street 32 34 Street Blandford St. Mary's Street St. Pleasant Street Pleasant Babcock Street Babcock Beacon Street Massachusetts Turnpike Crowninshield Road Crowninshield Lenox Street Mountfort Street Mountfort Street Brookline Avenue Arundel Street Fenway Park Euston Street South Campus Essex Street BROOKLINE St. Prescott Street Carlton BOSTON 24 Park Drive Miner Street SCHOOLS & COLLEGES CAMPUS LIFE Aberdeen Street 16 Boston University Academy, 1 University Rd. 6 Agganis Arena, 925 Comm. Ave. Buswell St 25 College of Arts & Sciences, 725 Comm. Ave. 48 Barnes & Noble at Boston University, 660 Beacon St. 33 College of Communication, 640 Comm. Ave. 3 Case Athletic Center, 285 Babcock St. H C Line 32 College of Engineering, 44 Cummington St. 8 Fitness & Recreation Center, 915 Comm. Ave. 14 College of Fine Arts, 855 Comm.
  • Commission Federale Des Officiels Techniques

    Commission Federale Des Officiels Techniques

    COMMISSION FEDERALE DES OFFICIELS TECHNIQUES Nominations des arbitres français sur les compétitions internationales 2019, au 04 octobre 2019 Niveau Dates Tournoi Lieu Arbitre ou UM désigné Compétition 08-13 janv Thailand Masters Bangkok BWF Super 300 MESTON François 10-13 janv Estonian International Tallinn Int. Series LAPLACE Patrick 17-20 janv Swedish Open Lund Int. Series DAMANY Xavier 22-27 janv Indonesia Masters Jakarta BWF Super 500 VENET Stéphane 15-17 fév Spanish Junior Oviedo Junior Int. Series VIOLLETTE Gilles 15-17 fév France U17 Open Aire sur la Lys BEC-U17 voir liste 19-24 fév Spain Masters Barcelone BWF Super 300 RUCHMANN Emilie 22-24 fév Italian Junior Milan Junior Int. Series LOYER Julie 26 fév - 03 mars German Open Muelheim an der Ruhr BWF Super 300 BERTIN Véronique Junior Int. Grand 27 fév-03 mars Dutch Junior Haarlem DAMANY Xavier Prix 06-10 mars All England Open Birmingham BWF Super 1000 DITTOO Haidar 07-10 mars Portuguese International Caldas da Rainha Int. Series MATON Evelyne Junior Int. Grand 07-10 mars German Junior Berlin LAPLACE Patrick Prix 12-17 mars Swiss Open Bâle BWF Super 300 SAUVAGE Micheline 19-24 mars Orléans Masters Orléans BWF Super 100 voir liste 26-31 mars India Open New Delhi BWF Super 500 GOUTTE Michel 28-31 mars Polish Open Czestochowa Int. Challenge STRADY Jean-Pierre FAUVET Antoine 04-07 avril Finnish Open Vantaa Int. Challenge COUVAL Sébastien (Assessment) 11-14 avril Dutch International Wateringen Int. Series DELCROIX Claude 18-21 avril Croatian International Zagreb Future Series JOSSE Stéphane 09-12 mai Denmark Challenge Farum Int.
  • October 13, 2020 Anüngdang 12:00 Jenbutsü Atema Iba Tenokdangba Senden Ka Menogo

    October 13, 2020 Anüngdang 12:00 Jenbutsü Atema Iba Tenokdangba Senden Ka Menogo

    www.tiryimyim.in Regd. No. RNI. NAGAAO/ 2004 / 13113. Postal-NE/RN-717. e-mail : [email protected] TAPAK 8 TAPAK 3 Tajikistan-i par lenir Rahmon BJP MLA temi CM Biplab maneni shimtetshir Deb anema noktaker VOL. XVIII NO. 06 (ADOK 06) DIMAPUR SANGTENNÜ (TUESDAY) MONGPUTENI (OCTOBER) 13, 2020 ` 5.00 Oct 18 tashi lungkak aitba anena atar: NSF & ENSF Nagaland Cabinet Minister CM Chang asü Dimapur, October 12 (TYO): Chang ajungbena asüba ajanga Dimapur, October 12 (TYO): aser pa dak taochi aser tangar Hombarnü NSF aser ENSF-i October 18, 2020 tashi lungkak Hombarnü Nagaland nung Cabinet yarinüba tangatetba liasü" ta Nagaland ajungalen sorkar garitem aitba sentong magitsü telemtetba Minister CM Chang asü. Pa arishi küm Chingwang Konyak-i ashi. mesenzüdaktsüi lungkak aitogo. agiogo, ta tenatisa ashi. 78 liasü. "Pai public aser sorkar tenzükba Tanü kaketshirtemi tashi mangai Asür C M Chang nem tetushi CM Chang ya Environment, wadang nung shilem agiogo aser lokti senzüba sorkar gari 37 tashi apu, ta agüja lungkak aitba anena atar saka Forest & Climate Change & Justice & asoshi temulung agüja inyakogo. Pai NSF tir Ninoto Awomi aser ENSF October 19, 2020 nungibo sorkar Law Minister liasü aser pai pa iba akümli toktsür aobaji party aser tir Sepili L. Sangtam nati garitem maneni noktangtsü, ta kinungtsü den jabaso trok aser jala state atema takoksa tulu lir aser talisa metetdaktsü. Ninoto Awomi aser Sepili L. pungu toktsür aliba nungi pilaogo. ENPO tesem nung alirtem atema Nagaland Minister asür C M Sangtam nati metetdaktsü. Pa kechi timtem ajanga asü'ar takoksa ulura lir" ta paisa metetdaktsü. mejangja saka pa mapang tatsüka Kübotsü küna den NDPP DoSE-i NSF aser ENSF dang lungkak aitba anentsü mepishir Naga Hospital Authority, Kohima züngsem ajaki asüri toktsür aoba nung temang anepalua aru.
  • Summer-Projects-2014-Final.Pdf

    Summer-Projects-2014-Final.Pdf

    Facilities Management & Planning Summer 2014 Projects 22 3 21 9 13 20 8 19 6 7 11 17 4 5 14 15 10 16 18 MEDICAL CAMPUS: 12 75 East Newton Street 1 (E Building) 72 East Concord Street (L Building) 2 From routine maintenance to meeting milestones, it’s all in a day’s work for FM&P. The University’s city within a city spans two campuses with 322 buildings on 135 acres. And it’s bustling year round for Facilities Management & Planning (FM&P). After a long, cold winter, we’re looking forward to longer days and shortening our project list. Please take a moment to look over our summer break projects. Questions? Contact Lauren Stanton at [email protected] or 617-358-5650. 1 KEEFER AUDITORIUM SEATING UPGRADE 4 IS&T HELP CENTER 75 East Newton Street (E Building) 179 Amory Street Seating will be upgraded in the Keefer Auditorium. The Information Services & Technology (IS&T) Project scope includes replacement of 132 tablet Help Center provides tech support (software, arm chairs and cosmetic improvements in the 2,384 hardware, account services) to the BU community sf auditorium. via phone, email, and walk-in locations. This summer, IS&T locations at 111 Cummington Mall and 533 2 L-11 TESTING FACILITY Commonwealth Avenue will be consolidated at this 72 East Concord Street (L Building) new location. 7,488 sf of the L Building’s library on the 11th floor The single Help Center location, will allow IS&T to will be transitioned into a dedicated testing and better support students and instructors.
  • P E R C E P T IO NS of GERMANY B a L T IC SEA RE GION Andris Sprūds Elizabete Vizgunova I N the SEC U R IT Y O F T

    P E R C E P T IO NS of GERMANY B a L T IC SEA RE GION Andris Sprūds Elizabete Vizgunova I N the SEC U R IT Y O F T

    PERCEPTIONS OF GERMANY IN THE SECURITY OF THE BALTIC SEA REGION SEA OF GERMANY IN THE SECURITY BALTIC PERCEPTIONS e Latvian Institute of International Aairs is the oldest Latvian G E R M think tank that specializes in foreign and security policy analysis. It is an O F A N S Y independent research institute that conducts research, develops N publications and organizes public lectures and conferences related to I O global aairs and Latvia's international role and policies. T P E C R www.liia.lv E P I N T H E S Konrad-Adenauer-Stiung (KAS) is a German political foundation E named aer the rst Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. C His name is synonymous with the rm alignment of foreign policy with U the transatlantic community of values and the vision of a unied R Europe. I T Y With more than 80 oces abroad and projects in 120 states, G I O N KAS actively promotes the values of freedom, justice and solidarity E R O around the globe. e Nordic Countries Project of KAS based in A Riga/Latvia strengthens the ties between Germany and the Nordic E F S Countries by promoting political dialogue, organizing political confer- C ences and further improvement of cooperation with ink Tanks, I T non-governmental organizations and the civil society. T H L A E B www.kas.de EDITORS Andris Sprūds Elizabete Vizgunova PERCEPTIONS OF GERMANY IN THE SECURITY OF THE BALTIC SEA REGION EDITORS Andris Sprūds Elizabete Vizgunova PERCEPTIONS OF GERMANY IN THE SECURITY OF THE BALTIC SEA REGION EDITORS Andris Sprūds Elizabete Vizgunova Supported by: The book project ‘Perceptions of Germany in the Security of the Baltic Sea Region’ assembles the contributions from Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and Germany.
  • Charles River Campus Map 2010/2011 Campus Guide

    Charles River Campus Map 2010/2011 Campus Guide

    Charles River Campus Map 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Cambridge MASSACHUSETTS AVE. SOLDIERS FIELD ROAD To E A MEMORIAL DRIV A 619 M A 285 SS 120 AC 512 100 300 HU C3 S BOSTON UNIVERSITY BRIDGE ET TS ASHFORD ST. T 277 U R 519 NickersonField NP B 33 IK B BU E 531 Softball P STORROW DRIVE CHARLESGATE EAST Field 11 P 53 CHARLESGATE WEST 2 275 53 91 10 83–65 61 GARDNER ST. P 147–139 115 117 Alpert 121 125 131 P 185–167 133 RALEIGH 209–191 153 157 163 32 225 213 273 Mall 632 610 481 BAY STATE ROAD DEERFIELD ST. 70 6056 25 P 765 P 96 94–74 264 C 771 270 172–152 118–108 C 122 767 124 236–226 214–182 140 128 P 19 176 178 656 1 660 648 735 2 565 BEACON STREET To Downtown 949 925 915 P 775 GRANBY ST. Boston 1 595 P 575 1019 P P 985 881 871 855 725 705 685 675 621 SILBER WAY P ALCORN ST. 755 745 635 C4 541–533 BUICK ST. BABCOCK ST. HARRY AGGANIS WAY HARRY M1 629 625 C6 UNIVERSITY RD. C5 MALVERN ST. MALVERN P AVENUE COMMONWEALTH AVENUE Kenmore LTH COMMONWEALTH AVENUE A Square E M2 M3 M4 D W D N 940 928 890–882 846–832 808 766–730 700 P 602 580 918 115 1010 728–718 710 704 500 O P P P M 940W M M FU MOUNTFORT ST.