A Natural Areas Inventory of Franklin County, Pennsylvania 2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Natural Areas Inventory of Franklin County, Pennsylvania 2004 A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 2004 Submitted to: The Franklin County Planning Commission Administrative Annex 218 North Second Street Chambersburg, PA 17201-1642 Prepared by: The Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 This project was funded in part by a state grant from the Growing Greener program and the Wild Resource Conservation Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) and the Franklin County Planning Commission. Additional funding came from the Alexander Stewart, M.D. Foundation and the Franklin County Planning Commission. ii Franklin County USGS Quadrangle Index Natural Areas of Franklin County (Numbered from north to south) iii Franklin County Township Index Natural Areas of Franklin County (Numbered from north to south) Municipalities of Franklin County iv Site Index: (Sites numbered from north to south) Site Site Name Municipality(ies) Map(s) Page(s) # 1 Concord Narrows Fannett Twp., and Huntingdon Co. 41b 41 2 Second Narrows Slopes Fannett Twp. 41b 41 3 Gunter Valley & Ridges Fannett Twp., Lurgan Twp. and Cumberland Co. 41b, 66b 41, 66 4 Rt-997 North of Roxbury Lurgan Twp. 66b 66 5 Neeleyton Ridgetop Fannett Twp., Metal Twp. and Huntingdon Co. 41b, 66b 41, 66 6 Pine Run Ponds Fannett Twp., Metal Twp. 41b, 66b 41, 66 7 Letterkenny Reservoir Letterkenny Twp., Lurgan Twp. 60b, 66b 60, 66 8 Roxbury Floodplain Letterkenny Twp., Lurgan Twp. 60b, 66b 60, 66 9 Middle Spring Creek Watershed Southampton Twp. and Cumberland County 102b 102 60b, 66b, 60, 66, 10 Conodoguinet Creek at Orrstown Letterkenny Twp., Southampton Twp., Lurgan Twp. 102b 102 11 Mountain Lake Metal Twp. 72b 72 Conodoguinet Creek in Upper Horse 12 Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 Valley 13 Clarks Knob Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 14 Keasey Run Wetlands Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 15 Letterkenny Army Depot Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 16 Mains Run Ponds Southampton Twp. and Cumberland Co. 102b 102 17 Big Pine Flat Green Twp. , Southampton Twp. and Cumberland Co. 44b, 102b 43, 102 18 Mountain Run Ponds Greene Twp., Southampton Twp 44b, 102b 44, 102 19 Dunn’s Creek Meadow Hamilton Twp. 56b 56 20 Bear Valley Letterkenny Twp., St. Thomas Twp. 60b, 108b 60, 108 21 Metal Church Spring Metal Twp. 72b 72 22 Upper West Branch Conococheague Creek Metal Twp., Peters Twp. 72b, 87b 72, 87 23 Tuscarora Ridgetop Metal Twp., Peters Twp. and Fulton Co. 72b, 87b 72, 87 72b, 87b 72, 87, 24 Upper Horse Valley Metal Twp., Peters Twp., St. Thomas Twp. 108b 108 25 Edenville Meadows St. Thomas Twp., Hamilton Twp. 56b, 108b 56, 108 26 Wilson Run St. Thomas Twp. 108b 108 27 Siberia Guilford Twp., Hamilton Twp. 50b, 56b 50, 56 28 Falling Spring Guilford Twp. 50b 50 30 Muskrat Fen Greene Twp. 44b 44 31 Conodoguinet Creek at Caledonia Park Greene Twp., and Adams County 44b 43 32 Mount Cydonia Guilford Twp., Greene Twp. 44b, 50b 43, 50 33 Mont Alto Mountain Guilford Twp., Quincy Twp. 50b, 98b 50, 98 30b, 50b, 34 Conococheague Creek Near Marion Hamilton, Guilford and Antrim Townships 28, 50, 56 56b Site Index: (Sites listed from north to south) Site Site Name Municipality(ies) Map(s) Page(s) # 35 St. Thomas Barren St. Thomas Twp. 108b 108 36 Fort Loudon Floodplain Peters Twp. 88b 86 37 Rattlesnake Ridge Peters Twp. 88b 86 38 Charlestown Ponds Peters Twp. 88b 86 39 Mercersburg Woods Montgomery Twp., Peters Twp. 78b, 88b 78, 86 40 Church Hill Marsh Peters Twp. 88b 86 41 Williamson Shrubland Antrim Twp., Peters Twp., St. Thomas Twp. 88b, 108b 87, 108 42 Sportsman’s Road Shale Bank Antrim Twp., Peters Twp. 30b, 87 29, 87 43 Muddy Run Spring Antrim Twp. 30b 29 44 Conococheague Creek at Rt-16 Antrim Twp. 30b 28 45 Nunnery Spring Quincy Twp, Washington Twp. 98b, 122b 98,122 46 Erosional Remnant Quincy Twp. 98b 98 47 Glen Forney Vernals Quincy Twp., Washington Twp. 98b, 122b 98,122 48 Makey Run Ponds Washington Twp. 122b 122 49 Beartown Woods Washington Twp. 122b 122 50 Happel’s Meadow Washington Twp. 122b 122 51 Hoover Spring Washington Twp. 122b 122 52 Zullinger Spring Washington Twp. 122b 122 53 Antietam West Branch Washington Twp. 122b 122 54 Waynecastle Old Field Habitat Antrim Twp., Washington Twp. 30b, 122b 29, 122 55 Martin’s Mill Bridge Antrim Twp. 30b 29 30b, 78b, 56 Highland School Fields Antrim Twp., Montgomery Twp., Peters Twp. 28, 77, 86 86b 57 Conococheague Creek at Highland School Montgomery Twp. 30b, 78b 28, 77 58 West Branch Conococheague Montgomery Twp. 78b 78 59 Mercersburg Meadow Montgomery and Peters Twp. 78b, 86b 77, 86 61 Shimpstown Meadows Montgomery Twp. 78b 78 62 Concrete Bottom at Licking Creek Montgomery Twp. 78b 77 63 Lower Conococheague Creek Antrim Twp., Montgomery Twp. 30b, 78b 29, 78 64 Tuscarora Trail Warren Twp. 116b 116 65 Little Cove Creek Cliff Warren Twp. 116b 116 66 SGL#124-Tuscarora Trail Warren Twp. 116b 116 67 Licking Creek Woods Warren Twp. and Maryland 116b 115 68 Needy Cave Washington Twp. 122b 122 vi Site Index: (Sites listed alphabetically) Site # Site Name Municipality(ies) Map(s) Page(s) 53 Antietam West Branch Washington Twp. 122b 122 60b, 20 Bear Valley Letterkenny Twp., St. Thomas Twp. 60, 108 108b 49 Beartown Woods Washington Twp. 122b 122 Southampton Twp., Greene Twp., and Cumberland 44b, 17 Big Pine Flat 43, 102 Co. 102b 38 Charlestown Ponds Peters Twp. 88b 86 40 Church Hill Marsh Peters Twp. 88b 86 13 Clarks Knob Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 1 Concord Narrows Fannett Twp., and Huntingdon Co. 41b 41 62 Concrete Bottom at Licking Creek Montgomery Twp. 78b 77 57 Conococheague Creek at Highland School Montgomery Twp. 30b, 78b 28, 77 44 Conococheague Creek at Rt-16 Antrim Twp. 30b 28 30b, 28, 50, 34 Conococheague Creek Near Marion Hamilton, Guilford and Antrim Townships 50b, 56b 56 31 Conodoguinet Creek at Caledonia Park Greene Twp., and Adams County 44b 43 60b, 60, 66, 10 Conodoguinet Creek at Orrstown Letterkenny Twp., Southampton Twp., Lurgan Twp. 66b, 102 102b Conodoguinet Creek in Upper Horse 12 Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 Valley 19 Dunn’s Creek Meadow Hamilton Twp. 56b 56 56b, 25 Edenville Meadows St. Thomas Twp., Hamilton Twp. 56, 108 108b 46 Erosional Remnant Quincy Twp. 98b 98 28 Falling Spring Guilford Twp., 50b 50 36 Fort Loudon Floodplain Peters Twp. 88b 86 98b, 47 Glen Forney Vernals Quincy Twp., Washington Twp. 98,122 122b 3 Gunter Valley & Ridges Lurgan Twp., Fannett Twp. and Cumberland Co. 41b, 66b 41, 66 50 Happel’s Meadow Washington Twp. 122b 122 30b, 28, 77, 56 Highland School Fields Montgomery Twp., Antrim Twp., Peters Twp. 78b, 86b 86 51 Hoover Spring Washington Twp. 122b 122 14 Keasey Run Wetlands Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 15 Letterkenny Army Depot Letterkenny Twp. 60b 60 7 Letterkenny Reservoir Letterkenny Twp., Lurgan Twp. 60b, 66b 60, 66 67 Licking Creek Woods Warren Twp. and Maryland 116b 115 65 Little Cove Creek Cliff Warren Twp. 116b 116 63 Lower Conococheague Creek Antrim Twp., Montgomery Twp. 30b, 78b 29, 78 16 Mains Run Ponds Southampton Twp., and Cumberland Co. 102b 102 48 Makey Run Ponds Washington Twp. 122b 122 Site Index : (Sites listed alphabetically) Site # Site Name Municipality(ies) Map(s) Page(s) 55 Martin’s Mill Bridge Antrim Twp. 30b 29 59 Mercersburg Meadow Montgomery and Peters Twp. 78b, 86b 77, 86 39 Mercersburg Woods Montgomery Twp., Peters Twp. 78b, 88b 78, 86 21 Metal Church Spring Metal Twp. 72b 72 9 Middle Spring Creek Watershed Southampton Twp., and Cumberland County 102b 102 33 Mont Alto Mountain Guilford Twp., Quincy Twp. 50b, 98b 50, 98 32 Mount Cydonia Guilford Twp., Greene Twp. 44b, 50b 43, 50 11 Mountain Lake Metal Twp. 72b 72 44b, 18 Mountain Run Ponds Greene Twp., Southampton Twp 44, 102 102b 43 Muddy Run Spring Antrim Twp. 30b 29 30 Muskrat Fen Greene Twp. 44b 44 68 Needy Cave Washington Twp. 122b 122 5 Neeleyton Ridgetop Fannett Twp., Metal Twp. and Huntingdon Co. 41b, 66b 41, 66 98b, 45 Nunnery Spring Quincy Twp, Washington Twp. 98,122 122b 6 Pine Run Ponds Fannett Twp., Metal Twp. 41b, 66b 41, 66 37 Rattlesnake Ridge Peters Twp. 88b 86 8 Roxbury Floodplain Letterkenny Twp., Lurgan Twp. 60b, 66b 60, 66 4 Rt-997 North of Roxbury Lurgan Twp. 66b 66 2 Second Narrows Slopes Fannett Twp. 41b 41 66 SGL#124-Tuscarora Trail Warren Twp. 116b 116 61 Shimpstown Meadows Montgomery Twp. 78b 78 27 Siberia Guilford Twp., Hamilton Twp. 50b, 56b 50, 56 42 Sportsman’s Road Shale Bank Antrim Twp., Peters Twp. 30b, 87b 29, 87 35 St. Thomas Barren St. Thomas Twp. 108b 108 23 Tuscarora Ridgetop Metal Twp., Peters Twp. and Fulton Co. 72b, 87b 72, 87 64 Tuscarora Trail Warren Twp. 116b 116 72b, 87b 72, 87, 24 Upper Horse Valley Metal Twp., Peters Twp., St. Thomas Twp. 108b 108 22 Upper West Branch Conococheague Creek Metal Twp., Peters Twp. 72b, 87b 72, 87 30b, 54 Waynecastle Old Field Habitat Antrim Twp., Washington Twp. 29, 122 122b 58 West Branch Conococheague Montgomery Twp. 78b 78 88b, 41 Williamson Shrubland Antrim Twp., Peters Twp., St. Thomas Twp. 87, 108 108b 26 Wilson Run St. Thomas Twp. 108b 108 52 Zullinger Spring Washington Twp. 122b 122 viii PREFACE The Franklin County Natural Areas Inventory is a document compiled and written by the Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy. It contains information on the locations of rare, threatened, and endangered species and of the highest quality natural areas in the county; it is not an inventory of all open space.
Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G
    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of Ontario & Summaries of Lepidoptera
    ISBN #: 0-921631-12-X BUTTERFLIES OF ONTARIO & SUMMARIES OF LEPIDOPTERA ENCOUNTERED IN ONTARIO IN 1991 BY A.J. HANKS &Q.F. HESS PRODUCTION BY ALAN J. HANKS APRIL 1992 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PAGE 1 2. WEATHER DURING THE 1991 SEASON 6 3. CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS T.E.A. SUMMARIES 7 4. SPECIAL NOTES ON ONTARIO LEPIDOPTERA 8 4.1 The Inornate Ringlet in Middlesex & Lambton Cos. 8 4.2 The Monarch in Ontario 8 4.3 The Status of the Karner Blue & Frosted Elfin in Ontario in 1991 11 4.4 The West Virginia White in Ontario in 1991 11 4.5 Butterfly & Moth Records for Kettle Point 11 4.6 Butterflies in the Hamilton Study Area 12 4.7 Notes & Observations on the Early Hairstreak 15 4.8 A Big Day for Migrants 16 4.9 The Ocola Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada .17 4.10 The Brazilian Skipper - New to Ontario & Canada 19 4.11 Further Notes on the Zarucco Dusky Wing in Ontario 21 4.12 A Range Extension for the Large Marblewing 22 4.13 The Grayling North of Lake Superior 22 4.14 Description of an Aberrant Crescent 23 4.15 A New Foodplant for the Old World Swallowtail 24 4.16 An Owl Moth at Point Pelee 25 4.17 Butterfly Sampling in Algoma District 26 4.18 Record Early Butterfly Dates in 1991 26 4.19 Rearing Notes from Northumberland County 28 5. GENERAL SUMMARY 29 6. 1990 SUMMARY OF ONTARIO BUTTERFLIES, SKIPPERS & MOTHS 32 Hesperiidae 32 Papilionidae 42 Pieridae 44 Lycaenidae 48 Libytheidae 56 Nymphalidae 56 Apaturidae 66 Satyr1dae 66 Danaidae 70 MOTHS 72 CONTINUOUS MOTH CYCLICAL SUMMARY 85 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Diet and Micro-Habitat Values for Wildlife and the Agronomic Potential of Selected Grassland Plant Species
    Report Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlifeand the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlife and the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A. Hopkins, A. Gundrey, R. Dunn & J. Tallowin Institute for Grassland and Environmental Research North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB J. Vickery & S. Gough British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Project officer Heather Robertson, Terrestrial Wildlife Team [email protected] Contractor(s) (where appropriate) S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • (Amsel, 1954) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Phycitinae) – a New Species for the Croatian Pyraloid Moth Fauna, with an Updated Checklist
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 30 No 1 37–52 ZAGREB July 31, 2021 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2021.30.4 PSOROSA MEDITERRANELLA (AMSEL, 1954) (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE, PHYCITINAE) – A NEW SPECIES FOR THE CROATIAN PYRALOID MOTH FAUNA, WITH AN UPDATED CHECKLIST DANIJELA GUMHALTER Azuritweg 2, 70619 Stuttgart, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) Gumhalter, D.: Psorosa mediterranella (Amsel, 1954) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Phycitinae) – a new species for the Croatian pyraloid moth fauna, with an updated checklist. Nat. Croat., Vol. 30, No. 1, 37–52, 2021, Zagreb. From 2016 to 2020 numerous surveys were undertaken to improve the knowledge of the pyraloid moth fauna of Biokovo Nature Park. On August 27th, 2020 one specimen of Psorosa mediterranella (Amsel, 1954) from the family Pyralidae was collected on a small meadow (985 m a.s.l.) on Mt Biok- ovo. In this paper, the first data about the occurrence of this species in Croatia are presented. The previ- ous mention in the literature for Croatia was considered to be a misidentification of the past and has thus not been included in the checklist of Croatian pyraloid moth species. P. mediterranella was recorded for the first time in Croatia in recent investigations and, after other additions to the checklist have been counted, is the 396th species in the Croatian pyraloid moth fauna. An overview of the overall pyraloid moth fauna of Croatia is given in the updated species list. Keywords: Psorosa mediterranella, Pyraloidea, Pyralidae, fauna, Biokovo, Croatia Gumhalter, D.: Psorosa mediterranella (Amsel, 1954) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae, Phycitinae) – nova vrsta u hrvatskoj fauni Pyraloidea, s nadopunjenim popisom vrsta.
    [Show full text]
  • BID TAB Propane 2018-2023.Xlsx
    PATurnpike Commission - Bid Tabulation Amerigas Propane LP Suburban Propane LP 447002-2018 King of Prussia PA Eldersburg MD BULK PROPANE GAS 7/12/2018 Awarded Amerigas Propane LP Suburban Propane LP Tank Size Item Location (Gallons) Differential Differential DISTRICT 1 1 500 New Castle Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 2 500 Homewood Maintenance Tower $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 3 500 Thompson Run Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 4 500 Salem Church Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 5 2 @ 100 Gibsonia Maintenance Tower $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 6 500 Beacon Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 7 500 Harrison City Maintenance $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 8 500 Irwin Interchange Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 9 500 Tyson's Corner Relay (WRO)$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 10 500 Greensburg Maintenance Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 11 500 M5 South Mainline Toll Plaza$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 12 500 Newcomer Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 13 500 Redstone Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 14 500 Gun Club Road Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 15 500 M52 North Mainline Toll Plaza$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 16 500 Hampton Road Relay Tower $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 17 500 Rodney Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 18 500 Donegal Maintenenace Tower $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 19 1000 Laurel Hill Bypass Salt Shed$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 DISTRICT 2 20 500 Laurel Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 21 500 Somerset State Police $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 22 2@1990 Heat Western Region Training Center$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 23 500 Allegheny Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 24 500 Bald Knob Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 25 500 Tussey Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 26 500 Everett Maintenance Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 27 2@1000 Heat Everett Truck Wash & Warehouse$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 28 500 Sideling Hill Salt Shed $ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 29 500 Sideling Hill Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 30 500 Tuscarora Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 31 500 Blue Mountain Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 32 500 Clarks Knob Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 DISTRICT 3 33 500 Newville Maintenance Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 34 500 Bunches Relay Tower$ 0.4790 $ 0.5200 35 500 Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society
    JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Volume 38 1984 Number 3 Joumal of the Lepidopterists' Society 38(3). 1984. 149-164 SOD WEBWORM MOTHS (PYRALIDAE: CRAMBINAE) IN SOUTH DAKOTA B. McDANIEL,l G. FAUSKEl AND R. D. GUSTIN 2 ABSTRACT. Twenty-seven species of the subfamily Crambinae known as sod web­ worm moths were collected from South Dakota. A key to species has been included as well as their distribution patterns in South Dakota. This study began after damage to rangeland in several South Dakota counties in the years 1974 and 1975. Damage was reported from Cor­ son, Dewey, Harding, Haakon, Meade, Perkins, Stanley and Ziebach counties. An effort was made to determine the species of Crambinae present in South Dakota and their distribution. Included are a key for species identification and a list of species with their flight periods and collection sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS Black light traps using the General Electric Fluorescent F ls T8 B1 15 watt bulb were set up in Brookings, Jackson, Lawrence, Minnehaha, Pennington and Spink counties. In Minnehaha County collecting was carried out with a General Electric 200 watt soft-glow bulb. Daytime collecting was used in several localities. Material in the South Dakota State University Collection was also utilized. For each species a map is included showing collection localities by county. On the maps the following symbols are used: • = collected by sweepnet. Q = collected by light trap. Key to South Dakota Cram binae 1a. Rs stalked .__ ... ___ .. __ ......................... _..... _ ................................. _._............................................. 2 lb. Rs arising directly from discal cell ................................................................. _............ _............
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the MAPS Program Into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S
    Integrating the MAPS Program into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5) A Report Submitted to the Northeast Coordinated Bird Monitoring Partnership and the American Bird Conservancy P.O. Box 249, 4249 Loudoun Avenue, The Plains, Virginia 20198 David F. DeSante, James F. Saracco, Peter Pyle, Danielle R. Kaschube, and Mary K. Chambers The Institute for Bird Populations P.O. Box 1346 Point Reyes Station, CA 94956-1346 Voice: 415-663-2050 Fax: 415-663-9482 www.birdpop.org [email protected] March 31, 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Collection of MAPS data.................................................................................................................... 5 Considered Species............................................................................................................................. 6 Reproductive Indices, Population Trends, and Adult Apparent Survival .......................................... 6 MAPS Target Species......................................................................................................................... 7 Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types
    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]